Notebookcheck

Kort testrapport Huawei MediaPad T5 (10.1-inch, LTE) Tablet

Mike Wobker, 👁 Daniel Schmidt, Felicitas Krohn, 29-09-2018

Full Metal Tablet. De van hoge kwaliteit materiaal gefabriceerde Huawei MediaPad T5 is uitgerust met een FHD beeldscherm en een krachtige quad-core CPU. In ons testrapport lees je wat je kunt verwachten van een tablet dat voor ongeveer $ 230 verkocht wordt.

Huawei MediaPad T5 10 (MediaPad Serie)
Processor
HiSilicon Kirin 659
Grafische kaart
ARM Mali-T830 MP2
Geheugen
3072 MB 
, LPDDR3
Beeldscherm
10.1 inch 16:10, 1920 x 1200 pixel 224 PPI, capacitief, IPS, glimmend: ja
Opslag
32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB 
, 22 GB beschikbaar
Verbindingen
1 USB 2.0, Audio Verbindingen: 3.5-mm audio, Card Reader: microSD, Sensoren: versnellingssensor
Netwerkmogelijkheden
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.2, GSM (900, 1800), WCDMA (900, 2100), LTE (1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 40), LTE, GPS
Afmetingen
hoogte x breedte x diepte (in mm): 7.7 x 243.4 x 162
Batterij
5100 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Besturingssysteem
Android 8.0 Oreo
Camera
Primary Camera: 5 MPix f/2.4
Secondary Camera: 2 MPix f/2.4
Bijkomende functionaliteiten
Luidsprekers: 2 luidsprekers, Toetsenbord: virtueel, Toetsenbordverlichting: ja, stroomadapter, microUSB-kabel, SIM-tool, EMUI 8.0, 24 Maanden Garantie, SAR (lichaam): 0.83 W/kg, fanless
Gewicht
460 g, Voeding: 50 g
Prijs
250 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Huawei MediaPad T5
Huawei MediaPad T5
Huawei MediaPad T5
Huawei MediaPad T5
Huawei MediaPad T5
Huawei MediaPad T5
Huawei MediaPad T5
Huawei MediaPad T5
Huawei MediaPad T5
Huawei MediaPad T5
Huawei MediaPad T5
Huawei MediaPad T5
Huawei MediaPad T5
Huawei MediaPad T5

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Medion Lifetab P10606
Adreno 505, 430, 32 GB eMMC Flash
305 MBit/s ∼100% +33%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
PowerVR GX6250, MT8176, 64 GB eMMC Flash
262 MBit/s ∼86% +14%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
PowerVR GX6250, MT8173, 64 GB eMMC Flash
241 MBit/s ∼79% +5%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10
Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 659, 32 GB eMMC Flash
229 MBit/s ∼75%
Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML)
Mali-T720 MP2, MT8735, 16 GB eMMC Flash
85.2 MBit/s ∼28% -63%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
PowerVR GX6250, MT8176, 64 GB eMMC Flash
240 MBit/s ∼100% 0%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10
Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 659, 32 GB eMMC Flash
239 MBit/s ∼100%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
PowerVR GX6250, MT8173, 64 GB eMMC Flash
227 MBit/s ∼95% -5%
Medion Lifetab P10606
Adreno 505, 430, 32 GB eMMC Flash
186 MBit/s ∼78% -22%
Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML)
Mali-T720 MP2, MT8735, 16 GB eMMC Flash
84.9 MBit/s ∼35% -64%
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Huawei MediaPad T5
GPS Huawei MediaPad T5
GPS Huawei MediaPad T5
GPS Huawei MediaPad T5
GPS Huawei MediaPad T5
GPS Huawei MediaPad T5

Beeldvergelijking

Bekijk een scène en navigeer binnen het eerste beeld. Eén klik wijzigt het zoomniveau. Eén klik op het ingezoomde beeld opent het origineel in een nieuw venster. Het eerste beeld toont de verschaalde foto van het testtoestel.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
336
cd/m²
340
cd/m²
331
cd/m²
347
cd/m²
356
cd/m²
338
cd/m²
327
cd/m²
339
cd/m²
345
cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 356 cd/m² Gemiddelde: 339.9 cd/m² Minimum: 3.16 cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling: 92 %
Helderheid in Batterij-modus: 356 cd/m²
Contrast: 712:1 (Zwart: 0.5 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.3 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.2
ΔE Greyscale 1.4 | 0.64-98 Ø6.5
97.7% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.16
Huawei MediaPad T5 10
IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1
Medion Lifetab P10606
IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1
Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML)
IPS, 1280x800, 10.1
Screen
-159%
-99%
-34%
-10%
Brightness middle
356
326
-8%
340
-4%
426
20%
392
10%
Brightness
340
338
-1%
320
-6%
399
17%
383
13%
Brightness Distribution
92
92
0%
84
-9%
91
-1%
81
-12%
Black Level *
0.5
0.56
-12%
0.19
62%
0.38
24%
0.25
50%
Contrast
712
582
-18%
1789
151%
1121
57%
1568
120%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
2.3
9.1
-296%
15
-552%
4.5
-96%
4.2
-83%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
6.5
18.2
-180%
22.8
-251%
7.9
-22%
11.2
-72%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
1.4
12
-757%
4
-186%
5.2
-271%
2.9
-107%
Gamma
2.16 102%
2.32 95%
2.09 105%
2.23 99%
2.23 99%
CCT
6565 99%
11359 57%
6940 94%
6875 95%
7115 91%

* ... kleiner is beter

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Om de schermhelderheid te verlagen schakelen sommige laptops het backlight erg snel aan en uit. Dit gebeurt aan een dergelijk hoge frequentie dat het niet zichtbaar is voor het menselijk oog. Als de frequentie te laag is kunnen personen met gevoelige ogen geïrriteerd geraken, hoofdpijn krijgen en zelfs flickering waarnemen.
Screen flickering / PWM waargenomen 67.57 Hz ≤ 20 % helderheid instelling

Het backlight van het scherm flikkert aan 67.57 Hz (hoogstwaarschijnlijk met PWM - Pulse-Width Modulation) aan een helderheid van 20 % en lager. Boven deze helderheid zou er geen flickering / PWM mogen optreden.

De frequentie van 67.57 Hz is erg laag en kan dus aanleiding geven tot geïrriteerde ogen en hoofdpijn bij langer gebruik.

Ter vergelijking: 52 % van alle geteste toestellen maakten geen gebruik van PWM om de schermhelderheid te verlagen. Als het wel werd gebruikt, werd een gemiddelde van 8931 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz waargenomen.

Responstijd Scherm

De responstijden van het scherm tonen hoe snel het scherm in staat is om van één kleur naar de andere te veranderen. Trage responstijden kunnen aanleiding geven tot 'nabeelden' rond bewegende objecten of het scherm wazig maken (blur). Vooral spelers van snelle 3D-games hebben baat bij een scherm met snelle responstijden.
       Responstijd Zwart naar Wit
29.8 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd↗ 19.6 ms stijging
↘ 13.2 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde relatief trage responstijden in onze tests en is misschien te traag voor games.
Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.8 (minimum) tot 240 (maximum) ms. » 73 % van alle toestellen zijn beter.
Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd slechter is dan het gemiddelde (25.6 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.
       Responstijd 50% Grijs naar 80% Grijs
28.4 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd↗ 21.2 ms stijging
↘ 27.2 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde relatief trage responstijden in onze tests en is misschien te traag voor games.
Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.9 (minimum) tot 636 (maximum) ms. » 13 % van alle toestellen zijn beter.
Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd beter is dan het gemiddelde (41 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
78980 Points ∼31% +17%
Average of class Tablet (14200 - 227987, n=59)
71242 Points ∼28% +6%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10
67359 Points ∼26%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (62810 - 68232, n=8)
65730 Points ∼26% -2%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
63777 Points ∼25% -5%
Medion Lifetab P10606
44015 Points ∼17% -35%
Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML)
34009 Points ∼13% -50%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet (20856 - 566378, n=17)
170590 Points ∼30% +95%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10
87335 Points ∼15%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (81992 - 89639, n=6)
87019 Points ∼15% 0%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
77717 Points ∼14% -11%
Medion Lifetab P10606
44992 Points ∼8% -48%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
4827 Points ∼47% +5%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (4615 - 4911, n=8)
4805 Points ∼47% +4%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10
4615 Points ∼45%
Average of class Tablet (2345 - 6315, n=26)
4260 Points ∼41% -8%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
3678 Points ∼36% -20%
Medion Lifetab P10606
3508 Points ∼34% -24%
Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML)
2980 Points ∼29% -35%
Work performance score
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
5843 Points ∼43% +1%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10
5798 Points ∼43%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (5798 - 6252, n=8)
5212 Points ∼39% -10%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
4895 Points ∼36% -16%
Average of class Tablet (2529 - 7053, n=68)
4483 Points ∼33% -23%
Medion Lifetab P10606
4449 Points ∼33% -23%
Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML)
3948 Points ∼29% -32%
BaseMark OS II
Web
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
1010 Points ∼50% +23%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (724 - 919, n=8)
819 Points ∼40% 0%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10
818 Points ∼40%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
803 Points ∼39% -2%
Average of class Tablet (9 - 2034, n=98)
743 Points ∼37% -9%
Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML)
672 Points ∼33% -18%
Medion Lifetab P10606
10 Points ∼0% -99%
Graphics
Average of class Tablet (98 - 28853, n=98)
2090 Points ∼7% +148%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (836 - 859, n=8)
848 Points ∼3% 0%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10
844 Points ∼3%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
833 Points ∼3% -1%
Medion Lifetab P10606
729 Points ∼3% -14%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
701 Points ∼2% -17%
Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML)
292 Points ∼1% -65%
Memory
Huawei MediaPad T5 10
1960 Points ∼31%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (1757 - 2011, n=8)
1910 Points ∼30% -3%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
1513 Points ∼24% -23%
Average of class Tablet (56 - 5423, n=98)
1046 Points ∼17% -47%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
968 Points ∼15% -51%
Medion Lifetab P10606
772 Points ∼12% -61%
Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML)
752 Points ∼12% -62%
System
Huawei MediaPad T5 10
3133 Points ∼19%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (2899 - 3223, n=8)
3056 Points ∼19% -2%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
2329 Points ∼14% -26%
Average of class Tablet (482 - 16467, n=98)
2259 Points ∼14% -28%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
1957 Points ∼12% -38%
Medion Lifetab P10606
1744 Points ∼11% -44%
Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML)
1192 Points ∼7% -62%
Overall
Huawei MediaPad T5 10
1435 Points ∼17%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (1334 - 1480, n=8)
1418 Points ∼17% -1%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
1312 Points ∼16% -9%
Average of class Tablet (150 - 8450, n=98)
1217 Points ∼14% -15%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
1016 Points ∼12% -29%
Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML)
647 Points ∼8% -55%
Medion Lifetab P10606
313 Points ∼4% -78%
Geekbench 4.1/4.2
Compute RenderScript Score
Average of class Tablet (862 - 43802, n=24)
7773 Points ∼18% +153%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
3081 Points ∼7% 0%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10
3077 Points ∼7%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (2772 - 3148, n=8)
3045 Points ∼7% -1%
Medion Lifetab P10606
2091 Points ∼5% -32%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
1562 Points ∼4% -49%
Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML)
1103 Points ∼3% -64%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Average of class Tablet (1106 - 18041, n=37)
4647 Points ∼13% +40%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (3316 - 3805, n=8)
3608 Points ∼10% +9%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10
3316 Points ∼9%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
3305 Points ∼9% 0%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
2489 Points ∼7% -25%
Medion Lifetab P10606
2477 Points ∼7% -25%
Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML)
1697 Points ∼5% -49%
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Average of class Tablet (429 - 5002, n=37)
1605 Points ∼25% +81%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
1541 Points ∼24% +74%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
1204 Points ∼19% +36%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (869 - 946, n=8)
919 Points ∼14% +4%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10
885 Points ∼14%
Medion Lifetab P10606
658 Points ∼10% -26%
Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML)
588 Points ∼9% -34%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics
Huawei MediaPad T5 10
1746 Points ∼41%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (1527 - 1827, n=8)
1696 Points ∼40% -3%
Average of class Tablet (793 - 2952, n=49)
1435 Points ∼34% -18%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
1363 Points ∼32% -22%
Medion Lifetab P10606
1221 Points ∼29% -30%
Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML)
860 Points ∼20% -51%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
843 Points ∼20% -52%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
Average of class Tablet (102 - 5384, n=49)
1174 Points ∼22% +739%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
557 Points ∼10% +298%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
413 Points ∼8% +195%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (140 - 338, n=8)
251 Points ∼5% +79%
Medion Lifetab P10606
240 Points ∼4% +71%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10
140 Points ∼3%
Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML)
108 Points ∼2% -23%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
Average of class Tablet (134 - 3806, n=54)
1031 Points ∼22% +486%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
602 Points ∼13% +242%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
489 Points ∼10% +178%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (176 - 409, n=8)
308 Points ∼7% +75%
Medion Lifetab P10606
292 Points ∼6% +66%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10
176 Points ∼4%
Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML)
134 Points ∼3% -24%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (1586 - 1788, n=8)
1707 Points ∼40% +8%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10
1586 Points ∼38%
Average of class Tablet (810 - 2952, n=52)
1368 Points ∼32% -14%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
1347 Points ∼32% -15%
Medion Lifetab P10606
1199 Points ∼28% -24%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
1128 Points ∼27% -29%
Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML)
810 Points ∼19% -49%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics
Average of class Tablet (42 - 7525, n=52)
1603 Points ∼19% +1503%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
884 Points ∼11% +784%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
598 Points ∼7% +498%
Medion Lifetab P10606
496 Points ∼6% +396%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (99 - 532, n=8)
288 Points ∼3% +188%
Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML)
167 Points ∼2% +67%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10
100 Points ∼1%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0
Average of class Tablet (53 - 4588, n=56)
1269 Points ∼20% +907%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
929 Points ∼14% +637%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
682 Points ∼11% +441%
Medion Lifetab P10606
570 Points ∼9% +352%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (125 - 627, n=8)
347 Points ∼5% +175%
Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML)
203 Points ∼3% +61%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10
126 Points ∼2%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
15117 Points ∼19% +17%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (11780 - 14930, n=8)
13618 Points ∼17% +6%
Average of class Tablet (3675 - 39393, n=137)
12935 Points ∼16% 0%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10
12893 Points ∼16%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
9729 Points ∼12% -25%
Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML)
9076 Points ∼11% -30%
Medion Lifetab P10606
8995 Points ∼11% -30%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score
Average of class Tablet (2109 - 194856, n=137)
17880 Points ∼3% +71%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
12771 Points ∼2% +22%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
11719 Points ∼2% +12%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (9936 - 11713, n=8)
11066 Points ∼2% +6%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10
10466 Points ∼2%
Medion Lifetab P10606
9602 Points ∼2% -8%
Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML)
4622 Points ∼1% -56%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score
Average of class Tablet (2411 - 103813, n=138)
14752 Points ∼7% +35%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
13227 Points ∼6% +21%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (10294 - 12278, n=8)
11543 Points ∼5% +6%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
11209 Points ∼5% +3%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10
10923 Points ∼5%
Medion Lifetab P10606
9460 Points ∼4% -13%
Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML)
5188 Points ∼2% -53%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
Average of class Tablet (4.2 - 451, n=164)
29.6 fps ∼0% +56%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
22 fps ∼0% +16%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10
19 fps ∼0%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (16 - 20, n=8)
18.8 fps ∼0% -1%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
18 fps ∼0% -5%
Medion Lifetab P10606
16 fps ∼0% -16%
Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML)
8.6 fps ∼0% -55%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
21 fps ∼1% +11%
Average of class Tablet (3.7 - 120, n=168)
20.3 fps ∼1% +7%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10
19 fps ∼1%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (16 - 20, n=8)
18.4 fps ∼1% -3%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
17 fps ∼1% -11%
Medion Lifetab P10606
15 fps ∼0% -21%
Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML)
14 fps ∼0% -26%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL
Average of class Tablet (1.8 - 220, n=102)
19.9 fps ∼0% +134%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
9.9 fps ∼0% +16%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
8.5 fps ∼0% 0%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10
8.5 fps ∼0%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (7.3 - 8.8, n=8)
8.31 fps ∼0% -2%
Medion Lifetab P10606
7.1 fps ∼0% -16%
Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML)
3.1 fps ∼0% -64%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Average of class Tablet (2.9 - 110, n=105)
14.2 fps ∼0% +67%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
9.5 fps ∼0% +12%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10
8.5 fps ∼0%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
8.3 fps ∼0% -2%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (6.7 - 8.9, n=8)
8.28 fps ∼0% -3%
Medion Lifetab P10606
6.6 fps ∼0% -22%
Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML)
6.2 fps ∼0% -27%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Average of class Tablet (2 - 173, n=52)
21.1 fps ∼0% +314%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
6 fps ∼0% +18%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10
5.1 fps ∼0%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
4.9 fps ∼0% -4%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (3.2 - 5.4, n=8)
4.81 fps ∼0% -6%
Medion Lifetab P10606
2.2 fps ∼0% -57%
Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML)
2 fps ∼0% -61%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Average of class Tablet (4.3 - 95, n=52)
13 fps ∼0% +160%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
5.7 fps ∼0% +14%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (4.5 - 5.6, n=8)
5.04 fps ∼0% +1%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10
5 fps ∼0%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
4.7 fps ∼0% -6%
Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML)
4.3 fps ∼0% -14%
Medion Lifetab P10606
4.3 fps ∼0% -14%
GFXBench
off screen Car Chase Offscreen
Average of class Tablet (0 - 107, n=32)
14.9 fps ∼0% +381%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10
3.1 fps ∼0%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (2.9 - 3.2, n=8)
3.06 fps ∼0% -1%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
3 fps ∼0% -3%
Medion Lifetab P10606
2.5 fps ∼0% -19%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
2 fps ∼0% -35%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen
Average of class Tablet (0 - 47, n=32)
8.25 fps ∼0% +184%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
3.1 fps ∼0% +7%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (2.7 - 3.3, n=8)
2.96 fps ∼0% +2%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10
2.9 fps ∼0%
Medion Lifetab P10606
2.4 fps ∼0% -17%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
2 fps ∼0% -31%

Legende

 
Huawei MediaPad T5 10 HiSilicon Kirin 659, ARM Mali-T830 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Medion Lifetab P10606 Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Qualcomm Adreno 505, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50 Mediatek MT8176, PowerVR GX6250, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 Mediatek MT8173, PowerVR GX6250, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML) Mediatek MT8735, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Octane V2 - Total Score
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50 (Browser: Chrome Version 63)
8897 Points ∼100% +63%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 (Amazon Silk 61.2)
8570 Points ∼96% +57%
Average of class Tablet (1238 - 45734, n=155)
6345 Points ∼71% +16%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10 (Chrome 67)
5471 Points ∼61%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (4191 - 5471, n=8)
4947 Points ∼56% -10%
Medion Lifetab P10606 (Chrome 60)
3059 Points ∼34% -44%
Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML) (Chrome 59)
2290 Points ∼26% -58%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 (Amazon Silk 61.2)
137 Points ∼100% +21%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10 (Chrome 67)
113 Points ∼82%
Average of class Tablet (36 - 386, n=71)
109 Points ∼80% -4%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (86 - 120, n=8)
104 Points ∼76% -8%
Medion Lifetab P10606 (Chrome 60)
63 Points ∼46% -44%
Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML) (Chrome 59)
54 Points ∼39% -52%
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
Average of class Tablet (10.9 - 279, n=70)
55.7 Points ∼100% +89%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50 (Browser: Chrome Version 63)
47.337 Points ∼85% +61%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 (Amazon Silk 61.2)
46.39 Points ∼83% +57%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10 (Chrome 67)
29.467 Points ∼53%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (23.4 - 31.3, n=8)
28.1 Points ∼50% -5%
Medion Lifetab P10606 (Chrome 60)
18.873 Points ∼34% -36%
Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML) (Chrome 59)
15.407 Points ∼28% -48%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML) (Chrome 59)
13705 ms * ∼100% -47%
Medion Lifetab P10606 (Chrome 60)
12793.8 ms * ∼93% -38%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (8684 - 10788, n=8)
9440 ms * ∼69% -2%
Average of class Tablet (603 - 43092, n=166)
9352 ms * ∼68% -1%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10 (Chrome 67)
9293.1 ms * ∼68%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 (Amazon Silk 61.2)
3975.5 ms * ∼29% +57%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50 (Browser: Chrome Version 63)
3756.1 ms * ∼27% +60%

* ... kleiner is beter

Huawei MediaPad T5 10Medion Lifetab P10606Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50Amazon Fire HD 10 2017Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML)Average 32 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Tablet
AndroBench 3-5
-30%
-38%
-31%
-52%
-33%
-61%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
72.53 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
64.9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-11%
56.82 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-22%
30.14 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-58%
34.9
-52%
47.1 (3.4 - 87.1, n=111)
-35%
42.5 (14.6 - 73.8, n=41)
-41%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
83.94 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
79.64 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-5%
80.4 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-4%
55.49 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-34%
40.9
-51%
66.3 (8.2 - 96.5, n=111)
-21%
60.8 (34.4 - 87.7, n=41)
-28%
Random Write 4KB
76.12
12.02
-84%
8.77
-88%
9.37
-88%
9.8
-87%
18.9 (0.75 - 77.3, n=151)
-75%
5.48 (0.13 - 77.9, n=191)
-93%
Random Read 4KB
76.67
34.59
-55%
13.7
-82%
27.72
-64%
23
-70%
36.3 (3.59 - 117, n=151)
-53%
17.4 (1.32 - 142, n=191)
-77%
Sequential Write 256KB
83.84
74.24
-11%
92.38
10%
147.67
76%
66
-21%
95 (14.8 - 189, n=151)
13%
34.5 (2.04 - 208, n=191)
-59%
Sequential Read 256KB
312.17
274.74
-12%
173.7
-44%
262.2
-16%
216
-31%
230 (25.8 - 440, n=151)
-26%
104 (6.75 - 741, n=191)
-67%
Dead Trigger 2
 InstellingenWaarde
 high30 fps
  Your browser does not support the canvas element!
Arena of Valor
 InstellingenWaarde
 min31 fps
 high HD31 fps
  Your browser does not support the canvas element!
Max. Belasting
 29.1 °C30.2 °C32.8 °C 
 27.8 °C28.4 °C32.5 °C 
 27.5 °C28.8 °C32.5 °C 
Maximum: 32.8 °C
Gemiddelde: 30 °C
29.1 °C30.5 °C29.2 °C
29.2 °C29 °C28 °C
28.4 °C28.7 °C27.5 °C
Maximum: 30.5 °C
Gemiddelde: 28.8 °C
Stroomadapter (max.)  34.2 °C | Kamertemperatuur 20.8 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 30 °C / 86 F, compared to the average of 30.8 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 32.8 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 34.8 °C / 95 F, ranging from 22.3 to 51.8 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 30.5 °C / 87 F, compared to the average of 34.4 °C / 94 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.6 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs203034.22536.134.43132274029.429.95031.533.36327.923.28022.121.11002224.712521.223.316021.534.220020.344.925018.451.431517.357.140016.765.35001766.163016.167.780015.866.5100015.872.5125015.371.3160015.874.2200014.975.325001577.3315014.776400014.778.350001577.4630015.174.480001576.41000015.476.2125001569.71600016.350.5SPL27.687.1N168.6median 15.8median 69.7Delta1.912.328.630.724.926.324.627.126.423.530.832.323.621.520.220.419.91917.622.719.13619.135.917.44016.945.316.850.615.155.316.560.915.662.91561.215.562.415.362.815.763.815.564.915.564.415.459.515.858.11656.315.853.616.15516.153.517.358.527.973.5130.3median 16median 56.30.69.2hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseHuawei MediaPad T5 10Medion Lifetab P10606
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Huawei MediaPad T5 10 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.9% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 52% of all tested devices in this class were better, 15% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 36%
Compared to all devices tested
» 56% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 35% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Medion Lifetab P10606 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (73.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 58% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 31% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 36%
Compared to all devices tested
» 60% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 32% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Stroomgebruik
Uit / Standbydarklight 0.03 / 0.27 Watt
Inactiefdarkmidlight 2.33 / 8.46 / 8.49 Watt
Belasting midlight 11.14 / 12.3 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Huawei MediaPad T5 10
5100 mAh
Medion Lifetab P10606
7000 mAh
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
6100 mAh
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
6300 mAh
Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML)
4680 mAh
Power Consumption
33%
10%
38%
60%
Idle Minimum *
2.33
1.4
40%
3.21
-38%
1.55
33%
0.76
67%
Idle Average *
8.46
4.17
51%
5.97
29%
4.17
51%
3.23
62%
Idle Maximum *
8.49
4.2
51%
6.19
27%
4.25
50%
3.35
61%
Load Average *
11.14
7.5
33%
9.72
13%
7.13
36%
4.79
57%
Load Maximum *
12.3
13.71
-11%
9.97
19%
9.63
22%
5.72
53%

* ... kleiner is beter

Batterijduur
Inactief (zonder WLAN, minimale helderheid)
55h 29min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
8h 45min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
9h 40min
Belast (maximale helderheid)
4h 01min
Huawei MediaPad T5 10
5100 mAh
Medion Lifetab P10606
7000 mAh
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
6100 mAh
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
6300 mAh
Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML)
4680 mAh
Batterijduur
26%
-44%
-13%
-10%
Reader / Idle
3329
1506
-55%
735
-78%
960
-71%
1321
-60%
H.264
580
660
14%
585
1%
622
7%
WiFi v1.3
525
796
52%
387
-26%
542
3%
467
-11%
Load
241
463
92%
175
-27%
274
14%
302
25%

Pro

+ fatsoenlijke systeemprestaties
+ handzaam formaat
+ ondersteuning voor GSM, 3G en LTE netwerken
+ voorgeïnstalleerde apps kunnen makkelijk verwijderd worden

Contra

- geen snelladen
- matige camera's
- apps kunnen niet verplaatst worden naar de SD-kaart
- hoog stroomverbruik
- stroomadapter te zwak
- geen omgevingslichtsensor
In review: Huawei MediaPad T5. Review unit courtesy of Huawei Germany.
In review: Huawei MediaPad T5. Review unit courtesy of Huawei Germany.

Dit is de verkorte versie van het originele artikel. Het volledige, Engelse testrapport vind je hier.

Tijdens onze tests blijkt de MediaPad T5 een goed presterend tablet die geschikt is voor de meeste alledaagse taken, of dat nu surfen of gamen is. Dankzij het 10-inch beeldscherm blijft het tablet relatief draagbaar.

De Huawei MediaPad T5 biedt voldoende prestaties voor een lage prijs. De fabrikant heeft echter bespaart op de aansluitingen.

De prijs van ongeveer $ 230 houdt in dat sommige compromissen gesloten moeten worden. Kijk bijvoorbeeld naar de camera's: deze zijn maar net goed genoeg voor zo nu en dan een kiekje. Of het relatief kleine opslag van 32 GB, dat met een microSD-kaart uitgebreid kan worden, maar enkel voor de opslag van mediabestanden en niet voor apps. Ons grootste punt van kritiek is echter de onnodig lange laadtijd, wat sommige kopers niet erg zullen vinden. Het tablet mist ook features zoals een vingerafdrukscanner of automatische aanpassing van de helderheid.

Huawei MediaPad T5 10 - 23-09-2018 v6
Mike Wobker

Behuizing
81%
Toetsenbord
71 / 80 → 89%
Aanwijsapparaat
81%
Aansluitmogelijkheden
37 / 65 → 56%
Gewicht
84 / 40-88 → 91%
Batterij
91%
Beeldscherm
87%
Gaming-performance
17 / 68 → 25%
Applicatie-performance
55 / 76 → 72%
Temperatuur
93%
Luidheid
100%
Audio
62 / 91 → 68%
Camera
42 / 85 → 50%
Gemiddelde
69%
81%
Tablet - Gewogen Gemiddelde

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Overzichten en testrapporten over laptops en mobieltjes > Testrapporten > Kort testrapport Huawei MediaPad T5 (10.1-inch, LTE) Tablet
Mike Wobker, 2018-09-29 (Update: 2018-09-29)