Notebookcheck

Kort testrapport Oppo Find X2 Neo smartphone: Modelverwarring bij Oppo

De kloon. De Find X2 Neo is bijna identiek aan een ander model van Oppo. Beide hebben een mooie uitstraling, mid-range hardware en een ambitieus prijskaartje. Ontdek hier hoe de Oppo-smartphone presteert in onze test.
Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Daniel Schmidt, Felicitas Krohn,
Oppo Find X2 Neo (Find X2 Serie)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G 8 x 1.8 - 2.4 GHz, Kryo 475 Gold / Silver
Grafische kaart
Qualcomm Adreno 620
Geheugen
12288 MB 
Beeldscherm
6.5 inch 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixel 405 PPI, capacitief touchscreen, OLED, glimmend: ja, HDR, 90 Hz
Opslag
256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 256 GB 
, 225 GB beschikbaar
Verbindingen
1 USB 2.0, 0 USB 3.1 Gen2, Audio Verbindingen: USB-Type-C, 1 Vingerafdruklezer, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensoren: geomagnetische sensor, afstandssensor, accelerometer, gyro-sensor, USB-OTG, Miracast
Netwerkmogelijkheden
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.1, 2G: GSM 850/900/1800/1900 MHz; 3G: WCDMA 1/2/4/5/6/8/19; 4G: TD-LTE 38/39/40/41 LTE-FDD 1/2/3/4/5/7/8/12/17/18/19/20/26/28/32/66; 5G NSA n40/78 (additional OTA upgrades: 5G NSA 1/3/5/7/28) , LTE, 5G, GPS
Afmetingen
hoogte x breedte x diepte (in mm): 7.7 x 159.4 x 72.4
Batterij
4025 mAh Lithium-Ion
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Besturingssysteem
Android 10
Camera
Primary Camera: 48 MPix (Sony IMX586, 1/2-Zoll, f/1.7 diafragma, 6P-lens, OIS+EIS)+ 8 MP ultra-groothoekcamera (f/2.2 diafragma, 5P-lens, 115°)+13 MP tele-lens (f/2.4 diafragma, 5P)+ 2 MP (f/2.4), Camera2 API: Level3
Secondary Camera: 32 MPix f/2.4 diafragma, 5P
Bijkomende functionaliteiten
Luidsprekers: Stereo, Toetsenbord: Onscreen, SIM-kaart-opener, koptelefoon, modulaire adapter, siliconen hoesje, USB type-C-kabel, ColorOS 7, 24 Maanden Garantie, SAR: 0,83 W/kg (head), 1,30 kg/W (body), Widevine L1, GNSS: GPS, Galileo, BeiDou, GLONASS, fanless
Gewicht
171 g, Voeding: 90 g
Prijs
699 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Comparison devices

Evaluatie
Datum
Model
Gewicht
Drive
Formaat
Resolutie
Best Price
83 %
07-2020
Oppo Find X2 Neo
SD 765G, Adreno 620
171 g256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.5"2400x1080
84 %
06-2020
Oppo Reno3 Pro
SD 765G, Adreno 620
171 g256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.5"2400x1080
88 %
05-2020
Xiaomi Mi 10
SD 865, Adreno 650
208 g128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash6.67"2340x1080
86 %
07-2020
realme X50 Pro
SD 865, Adreno 650
205 g256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash6.44"2400x1080
88 %
06-2020
OnePlus 8
SD 865, Adreno 650
180 g256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash6.55"2400x1080
82 %
02-2020
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
SD 765G, Adreno 620
208 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.67"2400x1080
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
realme X50 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 865, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
914 (min: 888, max: 928) MBit/s ∼100% +35%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
903 (min: 881, max: 916) MBit/s ∼99% +33%
OnePlus 8
Adreno 650, SD 865, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
894 (min: 864, max: 925) MBit/s ∼98% +32%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
687 (min: 345, max: 697) MBit/s ∼75% +1%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
678 (min: 664, max: 686) MBit/s ∼74%
Oppo Reno3 Pro
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
639 (min: 556, max: 658) MBit/s ∼70% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 1414, n=562)
267 MBit/s ∼29% -61%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
OnePlus 8
Adreno 650, SD 865, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
937 (min: 466, max: 960) MBit/s ∼100% +49%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
867 (min: 440, max: 907) MBit/s ∼93% +38%
realme X50 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 865, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
849 (min: 414, max: 930) MBit/s ∼91% +35%
Oppo Reno3 Pro
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
634 (min: 526, max: 657) MBit/s ∼68% +1%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
628 (min: 294, max: 639) MBit/s ∼67%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
341 (min: 280, max: 399) MBit/s ∼36% -46%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 1599, n=562)
253 MBit/s ∼27% -60%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø677 (664-686)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø618 (294-639)
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Oppo Find X2 Neo
GPS Oppo Find X2 Neo
GPS Oppo Find X2 Neo
GPS Oppo Find X2 Neo
GPS Oppo Find X2 Neo
GPS Oppo Find X2 Neo
Ultra-groothoek
Ultra-groothoek
Groothoek
Groothoek
2x zoom
2x zoom
5x zoom
5x zoom
20x zoom
20x zoom

Beeldvergelijking

Bekijk een scène en navigeer binnen het eerste beeld. Eén klik wijzigt het zoomniveau. Eén klik op het ingezoomde beeld opent het origineel in een nieuw venster. Het eerste beeld toont de verschaalde foto van het testtoestel.

WeitwinkelLowLightWeitwinkel5-fach-ZoomUltraweitwinkel
klik om beelden te laden
ColorChecker
28.3 ∆E
47.1 ∆E
36.8 ∆E
32.8 ∆E
41.4 ∆E
54.3 ∆E
46.1 ∆E
31.2 ∆E
32.7 ∆E
27 ∆E
55.9 ∆E
57 ∆E
28.8 ∆E
42.8 ∆E
27.4 ∆E
62.3 ∆E
36.3 ∆E
38.9 ∆E
59.8 ∆E
61.1 ∆E
47 ∆E
35.3 ∆E
23.3 ∆E
13.4 ∆E
ColorChecker Oppo Find X2 Neo: 40.29 ∆E min: 13.42 - max: 62.32 ∆E
ColorChecker
15.9 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
12.5 ∆E
19.3 ∆E
10.7 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
14.6 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
6 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
12.2 ∆E
9.7 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
3.3 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
10.5 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
2.7 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
10.2 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
1.4 ∆E
ColorChecker Oppo Find X2 Neo: 8.14 ∆E min: 1.4 - max: 19.33 ∆E
790
cd/m²
801
cd/m²
835
cd/m²
793
cd/m²
797
cd/m²
833
cd/m²
791
cd/m²
795
cd/m²
831
cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 835 cd/m² Gemiddelde: 807.3 cd/m² Minimum: 2.58 cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling: 95 %
Helderheid in Batterij-modus: 797 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Zwart: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.4 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.8
ΔE Greyscale 6.4 | 0.64-98 Ø6.1
100% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.27
Oppo Find X2 Neo
OLED, 2400x1080, 6.5
Oppo Reno3 Pro
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.5
Xiaomi Mi 10
Super AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.67
realme X50 Pro
OLED, 2400x1080, 6.44
OnePlus 8
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.55
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
LCD IPS, 2400x1080, 6.67
Screen
-3%
38%
14%
38%
20%
Brightness middle
797
601
-25%
786
-1%
679
-15%
778
-2%
658
-17%
Brightness
807
574
-29%
791
-2%
690
-14%
783
-3%
643
-20%
Brightness Distribution
95
91
-4%
96
1%
97
2%
95
0%
93
-2%
Black Level *
0.49
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
5.4
4.84
10%
1.1
80%
3.2
41%
0.9
83%
1.8
67%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
9.2
8.26
10%
2.2
76%
6.2
33%
2.2
76%
4.4
52%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
6.4
5.2
19%
1.8
72%
4.1
36%
1.7
73%
3.8
41%
Gamma
2.27 97%
2.276 97%
2.26 97%
2.28 96%
2.25 98%
2.22 99%
CCT
7245 90%
7164 91%
6315 103%
6604 98%
6481 100%
6255 104%
Contrast
1343

* ... kleiner is beter

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Om de schermhelderheid te verlagen schakelen sommige laptops het backlight erg snel aan en uit. Dit gebeurt aan een dergelijk hoge frequentie dat het niet zichtbaar is voor het menselijk oog. Als de frequentie te laag is kunnen personen met gevoelige ogen geïrriteerd geraken, hoofdpijn krijgen en zelfs flickering waarnemen.
Screen flickering / PWM waargenomen 370.4 Hz ≤ 99 % helderheid instelling

Het backlight van het scherm flikkert aan 370.4 Hz (hoogstwaarschijnlijk met PWM - Pulse-Width Modulation) aan een helderheid van 99 % en lager. Boven deze helderheid zou er geen flickering / PWM mogen optreden.

De frequentie van 370.4 Hz is relatief hoog en de meeste mensen die gevoelig zijn aan flickering zouden dit dus niet mogen waarnemen of geïrriteerde ogen krijgen. Er zijn echter rapporten die beweren dat sommige mensen toch flickering met 500 Hz en hoger kunnen waarnemen: opgelet dus.

Ter vergelijking: 51 % van alle geteste toestellen maakten geen gebruik van PWM om de schermhelderheid te verlagen. Als het wel werd gebruikt, werd een gemiddelde van 17916 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 2500000) Hz waargenomen.

Responstijd Scherm

De responstijden van het scherm tonen hoe snel het scherm in staat is om van één kleur naar de andere te veranderen. Trage responstijden kunnen aanleiding geven tot 'nabeelden' rond bewegende objecten of het scherm wazig maken (blur). Vooral spelers van snelle 3D-games hebben baat bij een scherm met snelle responstijden.
       Responstijd Zwart naar Wit
2.4 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd↗ 1.2 ms stijging
↘ 1.2 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde erg snelle responstijden in onze tests en zou zeer geschikt moeten zijn voor snelle games.
Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.8 (minimum) tot 240 (maximum) ms. » 0 % van alle toestellen zijn beter.
Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd beter is dan het gemiddelde (24.6 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.
       Responstijd 50% Grijs naar 80% Grijs
2.8 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd↗ 1.2 ms stijging
↘ 1.6 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde erg snelle responstijden in onze tests en zou zeer geschikt moeten zijn voor snelle games.
Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.9 (minimum) tot 636 (maximum) ms. » 1 % van alle toestellen zijn beter.
Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd beter is dan het gemiddelde (39 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.
Geekbench 5.1 / 5.2
Vulkan Score 5.1 (sorteer op waarde)
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
1192 Points ∼37%
Oppo Reno3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
1017 Points ∼31% -15%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
2549 Points ∼78% +114%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
3259 Points ∼100% +173%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
2663 Points ∼82% +123%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
1035 Points ∼32% -13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (1004 - 1192, n=5)
1082 Points ∼33% -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (70 - 4043, n=66)
1633 Points ∼50% +37%
OpenCL Score 5.1 (sorteer op waarde)
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
1266 Points ∼41%
Oppo Reno3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
1198 Points ∼39% -5%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
2829 Points ∼92% +123%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
3067 Points ∼100% +142%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
3001 Points ∼98% +137%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
1212 Points ∼40% -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (1178 - 1266, n=5)
1223 Points ∼40% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (272 - 4739, n=61)
1759 Points ∼57% +39%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sorteer op waarde)
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
1854 Points ∼54%
Oppo Reno3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
1799 Points ∼52% -3%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
3309 Points ∼97% +78%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
3087 Points ∼90% +67%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
3427 Points ∼100% +85%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
1520 Points ∼44% -18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (1520 - 1966, n=8)
1792 Points ∼52% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (445 - 3531, n=89)
1990 Points ∼58% +7%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sorteer op waarde)
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
620 Points ∼67%
Oppo Reno3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
606 Points ∼66% -2%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
910 Points ∼99% +47%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
915 Points ∼100% +48%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
919 Points ∼100% +48%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
569 Points ∼62% -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (554 - 673, n=8)
600 Points ∼65% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (124 - 1342, n=89)
567 Points ∼62% -9%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sorteer op waarde)
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
8456 Points ∼64%
Oppo Reno3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
8573 Points ∼65% +1%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
10613 Points ∼80% +26%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
13202 Points ∼100% +56%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
10800 Points ∼82% +28%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
9989 Points ∼76% +18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (7754 - 9989, n=8)
8461 Points ∼64% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2630 - 13202, n=490)
5834 Points ∼44% -31%
Work performance score (sorteer op waarde)
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
9955 Points ∼51%
Oppo Reno3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
9647 Points ∼49% -3%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
11850 Points ∼60% +19%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
19711 Points ∼100% +98%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
13079 Points ∼66% +31%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
10689 Points ∼54% +7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (8730 - 10876, n=8)
9783 Points ∼50% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1077 - 19711, n=648)
6373 Points ∼32% -36%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
2756 Points ∼70%
Oppo Reno3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
2737 Points ∼69% -1%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
3336 Points ∼85% +21%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
3947 Points ∼100% +43%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
3763 Points ∼95% +37%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
2588 Points ∼66% -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (2145 - 2893, n=8)
2682 Points ∼68% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1740 - 4057, n=149)
2636 Points ∼67% -4%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3147 Points ∼38%
Oppo Reno3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3135 Points ∼38% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
8175 Points ∼99% +160%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
8263 Points ∼100% +163%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
8294 Points ∼100% +164%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3167 Points ∼38% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (3059 - 3198, n=8)
3158 Points ∼38% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (203 - 8783, n=149)
2916 Points ∼35% -7%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sorteer op waarde)
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3065 Points ∼46%
Oppo Reno3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3037 Points ∼46% -1%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
6182 Points ∼93% +102%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
6644 Points ∼100% +117%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
6543 Points ∼98% +113%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
2978 Points ∼45% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (2877 - 3130, n=8)
3030 Points ∼46% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (253 - 6644, n=149)
2626 Points ∼40% -14%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3301 Points ∼60%
Oppo Reno3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3381 Points ∼61% +2%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
5187 Points ∼94% +57%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
5523 Points ∼100% +67%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
5401 Points ∼98% +64%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
2965 Points ∼54% -10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (1898 - 3544, n=8)
3152 Points ∼57% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 5780, n=496)
2175 Points ∼39% -34%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3569 Points ∼37%
Oppo Reno3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3531 Points ∼37% -1%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
9389 Points ∼98% +163%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
9567 Points ∼100% +168%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
9542 Points ∼100% +167%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3554 Points ∼37% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (3448 - 3589, n=8)
3545 Points ∼37% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (75 - 9567, n=496)
2075 Points ∼22% -42%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sorteer op waarde)
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3501 Points ∼43%
Oppo Reno3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3497 Points ∼43% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
7957 Points ∼97% +127%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
8204 Points ∼100% +134%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
8153 Points ∼99% +133%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3412 Points ∼42% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (2934 - 3605, n=8)
3430 Points ∼42% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (93 - 8204, n=497)
1926 Points ∼23% -45%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3099 Points ∼57%
Oppo Reno3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3440 Points ∼63% +11%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
3973 Points ∼73% +28%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
5478 Points ∼100% +77%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
5406 Points ∼99% +74%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3198 Points ∼58% +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (1790 - 3555, n=8)
3128 Points ∼57% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 5765, n=526)
2085 Points ∼38% -33%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
5356 Points ∼42%
Oppo Reno3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
5223 Points ∼41% -2%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
12601 Points ∼98% +135%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
12895 Points ∼100% +141%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
12873 Points ∼100% +140%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
5367 Points ∼42% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (5070 - 5437, n=8)
5313 Points ∼41% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (70 - 20154, n=526)
2762 Points ∼21% -48%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sorteer op waarde)
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
4621 Points ∼47%
Oppo Reno3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
4684 Points ∼47% +1%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
8499 Points ∼86% +84%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
9910 Points ∼100% +114%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
9850 Points ∼99% +113%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
4643 Points ∼47% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (3678 - 4893, n=8)
4568 Points ∼46% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (88 - 10699, n=526)
2321 Points ∼23% -50%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3395 Points ∼67%
Oppo Reno3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3324 Points ∼66% -2%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
4813 Points ∼95% +42%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
5068 Points ∼100% +49%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
4879 Points ∼96% +44%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3256 Points ∼64% -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (3233 - 3503, n=8)
3338 Points ∼66% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (435 - 5209, n=576)
2062 Points ∼41% -39%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3259 Points ∼39%
Oppo Reno3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3251 Points ∼39% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
8371 Points ∼100% +157%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
8345 Points ∼100% +156%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
8288 Points ∼99% +154%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3287 Points ∼39% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (3174 - 3321, n=8)
3271 Points ∼39% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53 - 8469, n=576)
1735 Points ∼21% -47%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sorteer op waarde)
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3301 Points ∼45%
Oppo Reno3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3267 Points ∼45% -1%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
7190 Points ∼99% +118%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
7293 Points ∼100% +121%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
7174 Points ∼98% +117%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3277 Points ∼45% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (3187 - 3346, n=8)
3280 Points ∼45% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 7323, n=577)
1658 Points ∼23% -50%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3259 Points ∼65%
Oppo Reno3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3357 Points ∼67% +3%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
4196 Points ∼83% +29%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
5034 Points ∼100% +54%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
4819 Points ∼96% +48%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3432 Points ∼68% +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (1689 - 3476, n=8)
3120 Points ∼62% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (293 - 5274, n=618)
1924 Points ∼38% -41%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
5148 Points ∼42%
Oppo Reno3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
4976 Points ∼41% -3%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
12234 Points ∼100% +138%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
11533 Points ∼94% +124%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
11540 Points ∼94% +124%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
5115 Points ∼42% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (4834 - 5832, n=8)
5152 Points ∼42% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 12494, n=617)
2277 Points ∼19% -56%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sorteer op waarde)
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
4561 Points ∼51%
Oppo Reno3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
4494 Points ∼50% -1%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
8581 Points ∼96% +88%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
8947 Points ∼100% +96%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
8810 Points ∼98% +93%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
4654 Points ∼52% +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (3576 - 4693, n=8)
4434 Points ∼50% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 9492, n=620)
1961 Points ∼22% -57%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
19658 Points ∼58%
Oppo Reno3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
20054 Points ∼59% +2%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
Points ∼0% -100%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
33793 Points ∼100% +72%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
27026 Points ∼80% +37%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
23203 Points ∼69% +18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (18769 - 23203, n=8)
20317 Points ∼60% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (735 - 58293, n=766)
15263 Points ∼45% -22%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sorteer op waarde)
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
69645 Points ∼48%
Oppo Reno3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
66415 Points ∼46% -5%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
Points ∼0% -100%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
145603 Points ∼100% +109%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
144611 Points ∼99% +108%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
68634 Points ∼47% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (66415 - 69645, n=8)
68420 Points ∼47% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (536 - 209431, n=764)
25897 Points ∼18% -63%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sorteer op waarde)
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
44531 Points ∼53%
Oppo Reno3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
43875 Points ∼52% -1%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
Points ∼0% -100%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
83917 Points ∼100% +88%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
72524 Points ∼86% +63%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
47824 Points ∼57% +7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (43325 - 47824, n=8)
44809 Points ∼53% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (662 - 112989, n=764)
20366 Points ∼24% -54%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sorteer op waarde)
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
94 fps ∼45%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
202 fps ∼98% +115%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
204 fps ∼99% +117%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
207 fps ∼100% +120%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
95 fps ∼46% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (94 - 97, n=6)
95.3 fps ∼46% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.5 - 322, n=772)
43.9 fps ∼21% -53%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sorteer op waarde)
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
61 fps ∼68%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
90 fps ∼100% +48%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
60 fps ∼67% -2%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
60 fps ∼67% -2%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
86 fps ∼96% +41%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (60 - 86, n=6)
64.5 fps ∼72% +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 120, n=781)
30.5 fps ∼34% -50%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sorteer op waarde)
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
56 fps ∼45%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
123 fps ∼98% +120%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
124 fps ∼99% +121%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
125 fps ∼100% +123%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
54 fps ∼43% -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (49 - 56, n=6)
54.2 fps ∼43% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.8 - 175, n=677)
25.8 fps ∼21% -54%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sorteer op waarde)
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
50 fps ∼57%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
88 fps ∼100% +76%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
60 fps ∼68% +20%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
60 fps ∼68% +20%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
48 fps ∼55% -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (47 - 55, n=6)
50 fps ∼57% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 115, n=685)
21.8 fps ∼25% -56%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
38 fps ∼43%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
86 fps ∼98% +126%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
86 fps ∼98% +126%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
88 fps ∼100% +132%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
37 fps ∼42% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (21 - 38, n=6)
34.8 fps ∼40% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.87 - 117, n=540)
20.8 fps ∼24% -45%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
34 fps ∼45%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
75 fps ∼100% +121%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
60 fps ∼80% +76%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
60 fps ∼80% +76%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
33 fps ∼44% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (32 - 34, n=6)
33.3 fps ∼44% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 110, n=542)
18.9 fps ∼25% -44%
GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
13 fps ∼42%
Oppo Reno3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
13 fps ∼42% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
29 fps ∼94% +123%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
30 fps ∼97% +131%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
31 fps ∼100% +138%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
8.9 fps ∼29% -32%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (8.5 - 13, n=8)
11.8 fps ∼38% -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.61 - 60, n=288)
11.2 fps ∼36% -14%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
8.5 fps ∼43%
Oppo Reno3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
8.3 fps ∼42% -2%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
20 fps ∼100% +135%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
20 fps ∼100% +135%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
20 fps ∼100% +135%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
13 fps ∼65% +53%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (8.3 - 13, n=8)
9.63 fps ∼48% +13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.21 - 101, n=286)
8.07 fps ∼40% -5%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
21 fps ∼44%
Oppo Reno3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
21 fps ∼44% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
46 fps ∼96% +119%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
46 fps ∼96% +119%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
48 fps ∼100% +129%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
21 fps ∼44% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (20 - 21, n=8)
20.8 fps ∼43% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 60, n=292)
16.6 fps ∼35% -21%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
24 fps ∼44%
Oppo Reno3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
23 fps ∼43% -4%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
53 fps ∼98% +121%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
53 fps ∼98% +121%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
54 fps ∼100% +125%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
23 fps ∼43% -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (23 - 24, n=8)
23.6 fps ∼44% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 257, n=291)
19.3 fps ∼36% -20%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
21 fps ∼40%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
50 fps ∼96% +138%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
51 fps ∼98% +143%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
52 fps ∼100% +148%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
21 fps ∼40% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (21 - 21, n=6)
21 fps ∼40% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 73, n=465)
14 fps ∼27% -33%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
19 fps ∼41%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
42 fps ∼91% +121%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
44 fps ∼96% +132%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
46 fps ∼100% +142%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
19 fps ∼41% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (18 - 19, n=6)
18.5 fps ∼40% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.1 - 60, n=469)
12.5 fps ∼27% -34%
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sorteer op waarde)
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
326795 Points ∼55%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
566256 Points ∼95% +73%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
593933 Points ∼100% +82%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
563466 Points ∼95% +72%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
298925 Points ∼50% -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (298925 - 332074, n=6)
318214 Points ∼54% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53335 - 607937, n=94)
315184 Points ∼53% -4%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sorteer op waarde)
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
1412 Points ∼90%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
1276 Points ∼81% -10%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
1576 Points ∼100% +12%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
1498 Points ∼95% +6%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
1378 Points ∼87% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (1196 - 1462, n=6)
1353 Points ∼86% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7 - 1745, n=709)
807 Points ∼51% -43%
Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
5216 Points ∼44%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
11730 Points ∼100% +125%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
11688 Points ∼100% +124%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
11654 Points ∼99% +123%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
5087 Points ∼43% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (5087 - 5216, n=6)
5172 Points ∼44% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (18 - 16996, n=709)
2428 Points ∼21% -53%
Memory (sorteer op waarde)
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
4856 Points ∼59%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
7450 Points ∼91% +53%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
8204 Points ∼100% +69%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
6912 Points ∼84% +42%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
5278 Points ∼64% +9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (4556 - 5683, n=6)
5147 Points ∼63% +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (21 - 8874, n=709)
1805 Points ∼22% -63%
System (sorteer op waarde)
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
6685 Points ∼66%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
9810 Points ∼97% +47%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
10147 Points ∼100% +52%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
10021 Points ∼99% +50%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
6870 Points ∼68% +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (6069 - 6870, n=6)
6619 Points ∼65% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (369 - 14189, n=709)
3374 Points ∼33% -50%
Overall (sorteer op waarde)
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3931 Points ∼63%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
5752 Points ∼93% +46%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
6205 Points ∼100% +58%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
5897 Points ∼95% +50%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3990 Points ∼64% +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (3674 - 4094, n=6)
3933 Points ∼63% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 6273, n=709)
1716 Points ∼28% -56%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
realme X50 Pro (Chrome 83)
69.54 Points ∼100% +77%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G (Chrome 80)
53.145 Points ∼76% +35%
OnePlus 8 (Chrome 83)
51.341 Points ∼74% +31%
Xiaomi Mi 10 (Xiaomi Browser V11.4.23)
50.878 Points ∼73% +29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (39.3 - 58.7, n=6)
48.6 Points ∼70% +24%
Average of class Smartphone (9.13 - 140, n=171)
40.2 Points ∼58% +2%
Oppo Find X2 Neo (Chrome 83)
39.325 Points ∼57%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Xiaomi Mi 10 (Xiaomi Browser V11.4.23)
118 Points ∼100% +59%
realme X50 Pro (Chrome 83)
102 Points ∼86% +38%
OnePlus 8 (Chrome 83)
99 Points ∼84% +34%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G (Chrome 80)
80 Points ∼68% +8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (72 - 101, n=6)
79.8 Points ∼68% +8%
Oppo Find X2 Neo (Chrome 83)
74 Points ∼63%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 184, n=236)
69.8 Points ∼59% -6%
Octane V2 - Total Score
realme X50 Pro
23768 Points ∼100% +44%
Xiaomi Mi 10 (Xiaomi Browser V11.4.23)
22016 Points ∼93% +33%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G (Chrome 80)
18809 Points ∼79% +14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (16523 - 19143, n=6)
18245 Points ∼77% +10%
Oppo Find X2 Neo (Chrome 83)
16523 Points ∼70%
OnePlus 8 (Chrome 83)
15745 Points ∼66% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (894 - 49388, n=767)
7690 Points ∼32% -53%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (1914 - 59466, n=793)
9892 ms * ∼100% -268%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G (Chrome 80)
2787 ms * ∼28% -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (2602 - 2835, n=6)
2726 ms * ∼28% -1%
Oppo Find X2 Neo (Chrome 83)
2689.4 ms * ∼27%
OnePlus 8 (Chrome 83)
2538.1 ms * ∼26% +6%
Xiaomi Mi 10 (Xiaomi Browser V11.4.23)
2103.5 ms * ∼21% +22%
realme X50 Pro (Chrome 83)
1999.7 ms * ∼20% +26%
realme X50 Pro
0 ms * ∼0% +100%

* ... kleiner is beter

Oppo Find X2 NeoOppo Reno3 ProXiaomi Mi 10realme X50 ProOnePlus 8Xiaomi Redmi K30 5GAverage 256 GB UFS 2.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
1%
47%
68%
56%
-27%
-14%
-70%
Random Write 4KB
143.8
146.7
2%
215.95
50%
251.98
75%
203.85
42%
100.99
-30%
119 (22.1 - 172, n=12)
-17%
33.1 (0.14 - 319, n=856)
-77%
Random Read 4KB
160.47
153.1
-5%
207.04
29%
229.38
43%
215
34%
96.8
-40%
160 (127 - 208, n=12)
0%
57.1 (1.59 - 324, n=856)
-64%
Sequential Write 256KB
454.36
471.6
4%
679.51
50%
756.21
66%
747.87
65%
312.76
-31%
329 (228 - 473, n=12)
-28%
122 (2.99 - 911, n=856)
-73%
Sequential Read 256KB
943.1
966.5
2%
1498.15
59%
1756.1
86%
1706.7
81%
889.67
-6%
840 (687 - 967, n=12)
-11%
329 (12.1 - 1802, n=856)
-65%
Max. Belasting
 37.2 °C37.5 °C35.9 °C 
 37.2 °C36.8 °C36.2 °C 
 37.6 °C37.4 °C36.5 °C 
Maximum: 37.6 °C
Gemiddelde: 36.9 °C
34.7 °C35.9 °C35.8 °C
34.3 °C35.4 °C36.5 °C
34.2 °C36.6 °C37.1 °C
Maximum: 37.1 °C
Gemiddelde: 35.6 °C
Stroomadapter (max.)  31.7 °C | Kamertemperatuur 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 36.9 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 33 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37.6 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 35.4 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 37.1 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.3 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 33 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2032.535.42529.430.63122.829.94025.326.55030.236.36323.326.98021.920.9100192412519.627.8160194120016.142.525018.950.831516.655.840014.359.65001564.763015.268.780014.372.2100014.373.2125014.273.5160014.875.3200014.875.3250014.476.1315014.377.3400014.677.8500014.774.1630014.971800014.967.51000014.6691250014.858.91600015.448.6SPL26.886.3N0.964.6median 14.8median 68.7Delta1.411.532.828.826.228.123.32521.925.52831.119.924.419.122.519.926.116.531.619.644.517.544.317.55113.956.713.961.415.865.215.265.61466.3146713.970.313.473.113.874.514.374.91473.414.572.714.670.914.569.414.768.415.165.41561.914.849.326.583.50.854.8median 14.6median 65.619.9hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseOppo Find X2 NeoXiaomi Mi 10
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Oppo Find X2 Neo audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 32% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 56% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 56% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 35% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Xiaomi Mi 10 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 9% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 37% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 56% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Stroomgebruik
Uit / Standbydarklight 0.02 / 0.3 Watt
Inactiefdarkmidlight 0.8 / 2.21 / 2.23 Watt
Belasting midlight 3.14 / 5.44 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Oppo Find X2 Neo
4025 mAh
Oppo Reno3 Pro
4025 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 10
4780 mAh
realme X50 Pro
4200 mAh
OnePlus 8
4300 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
4500 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
3%
-18%
-15%
-31%
-14%
-4%
Idle Minimum *
0.8
0.53
34%
1
-25%
0.9
-13%
0.66
17%
1.028 (0.66 - 1.8, n=6)
-29%
0.887 (0.2 - 3.4, n=866)
-11%
Idle Average *
2.21
1.46
34%
1.77
20%
2.3
-4%
2.37
-7%
2.17 (1.58 - 2.55, n=6)
2%
1.754 (0.6 - 6.2, n=865)
21%
Idle Maximum *
2.23
1.52
32%
1.86
17%
2.33
-4%
2.42
-9%
2.34 (1.6 - 2.9, n=6)
-5%
2.04 (0.74 - 6.6, n=866)
9%
Load Average *
3.14
3.83
-22%
4.23
-35%
3.5
-11%
6.8
-117%
4.04 (3.14 - 6.8, n=6)
-29%
4.09 (0.8 - 10.8, n=860)
-30%
Load Maximum *
5.44
8.89
-63%
9.13
-68%
7.68
-41%
7.5
-38%
6.02 (5.2 - 7.5, n=6)
-11%
6.04 (1.2 - 14.2, n=860)
-11%

* ... kleiner is beter

Batterijduur
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
11h 52min
Oppo Find X2 Neo
4025 mAh
Oppo Reno3 Pro
4025 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 10
4780 mAh
realme X50 Pro
4200 mAh
OnePlus 8
4300 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
4500 mAh
Batterijduur
WiFi v1.3
712
893
25%
662
-7%
775
9%
1045
47%
802
13%

Pro

+ helder 90 Hz OLED-paneel
+ 12 GB RAM / 256 GB UFS-opslag
+ Stereo-luidsprekers
+ hoogwaardige behuizing...

Contra

- ...met scherpe randen
- single-SIM / geen SD-kaartsleuf
- geen UFS 3.0
- zwakke prestaties (voor de prijsklasse)
- USB 2.0
- groothoekcamera
- geen Wi-Fi 6, draadloos opladen, IP-classificatie,
- geen e-simkaart
- geen 4K met 60 FPS

Conclusie - Mid-range voor een premium prijs

Getest: Oppo Find X2 Neo. Testtoestel voorzien door Oppo Germany.
Getest: Oppo Find X2 Neo. Testtoestel voorzien door Oppo Germany.

Dit is de verkorte versie van het originele artikel. Het volledige, Engelse testrapport vind je hier.

Een positief punt van de Find X2 Neo is ongetwijfeld het uitstekende en zeer heldere 90 Hz AMOLED-paneel, waardoor het gemakkelijk is om het toestel buitenshuis te gebruiken, zelfs in rechtstreeks zonlicht. Het ontwerp en de afwerking zijn erg aantrekkelijk - behalve de scherpe randen van de behuizing - en de prima Snapdragon 765G zorgt ook voor degelijke prestaties voor de Oppo-telefoon.

Met de huidige prijs van de Find X2 Neo kunnen we de Oppo-smartphone moeilijk aanbevelen.

De Chinese fabrikant komt echter op de proppen met een adviesprijs van bijna 700 euro voor zijn mid-range smartphone. In dit prijssegment kunnen kopers zeker premiumfuncties verwachten, zoals een IP-classificatie, Wi-Fi 6 of draadloos opladen, evenals krachtigere hardware, zoals een Snapdragon 865, LPDDR5-RAM of UFS 3.0-geheugen - al deze ontbreken in de Find X2 Neo. Verder schiet ook de camerakwaliteit tekort, waarbij vooral foto's met de ultragroothoeklens geen recht doen aan een smartphone van 700 euro in 2020.

Als je niet bang bent om uit China te importeren, kan je ook ons testrapport van de Oppo Reno3 Pro lezen.

Oppo Find X2 Neo - 22-06-2020 v7
Marcus Herbrich

Behuizing
86%
Toetsenbord
67 / 75 → 89%
Aanwijsapparaat
93%
Aansluitmogelijkheden
50 / 70 → 71%
Gewicht
91%
Batterij
89%
Beeldscherm
84%
Gaming-performance
36 / 64 → 56%
Applicatie-performance
76 / 86 → 89%
Temperatuur
91%
Luidheid
100%
Audio
80 / 90 → 89%
Camera
67%
Gemiddelde
78%
83%
Smartphone - Gewogen Gemiddelde

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Overzichten en testrapporten over laptops en mobieltjes > Testrapporten > Kort testrapport Oppo Find X2 Neo smartphone: Modelverwarring bij Oppo
Marcus Herbrich, 2020-07- 5 (Update: 2020-07- 5)
Christian Hintze
Editor of the original article: Christian Hintze - Editor