Notebookcheck

Kort testrapport Google Pixel 4a smartphone: Het draait niet om de megapixels

Uitstekende camera, lage prijs. In het verleden hebben de Pixel-smartphones van Google altijd kritiek gekregen voor een aantal aspecten. Met de Pixel 4a zijn de kritiekpunten echter tot een minimum beperkt en is er een budget-smartphone ontstaan die onder meer kan schitteren met zijn uitstekende camera.
Mike Wobker, 👁 Daniel Schmidt, Felicitas Krohn,
Google Pixel 4a (Pixel 4 Serie)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G 8 x 2.2 GHz, Kryo 470 Gold / Silver
Grafische kaart
Geheugen
6144 MB 
, LPDDR4x
Beeldscherm
5.8 inch 19.5:9, 2340 x 1080 pixel 444 PPI, capacitief, OLED, Corning Gorilla Glass 3, glimmend: ja, HDR, 60 Hz
Opslag
128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash, 128 GB 
, 113 GB beschikbaar
Verbindingen
1 USB 3.0, Audio Verbindingen: 3.5-mm audio-klink, 1 Vingerafdruklezer, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensoren: accelerometer, gyroscoop, afstandssensor, e-kompas, barometer, USB-C
Netwerkmogelijkheden
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.0, 2G GSM (850/900/1,800/1,900 MHz), 3G UMTS (B1/B2/B4/B5/B8), 4G LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B13/B17/B20/B25/B26/B28/B32/B38/B39/B40/B41/B66/B71), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Afmetingen
hoogte x breedte x diepte (in mm): 8.2 x 144 x 69.4
Batterij
3140 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Besturingssysteem
Android 11
Camera
Primary Camera: 12.2 MPix f/1.7, 27 mm, 1/2.55", 1.4 µm
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix f/2.0, 24 mm, 1.12 µm
Bijkomende functionaliteiten
Luidsprekers: Stereo-luidsprekers, Toetsenbord: onscreen, Toetsenbordverlichting: ja, USB-voeding, USB Type-C-kabel, SIM-tool, 24 Maanden Garantie, SAR-waarde (hoofd): 1.37 W/kg, SAR-waarde (lichaam): 1.39 W/kg, fanless
Gewicht
143 g, Voeding: 30 g
Prijs
350 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Comparison devices

Evaluatie
Datum
Model
Gewicht
Drive
Formaat
Resolutie
Best Price
84 %
09-2020
Google Pixel 4a
SD 730G, Adreno 618
143 g128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash5.8"2340x1080
85 %
05-2020
Apple iPhone SE 2020
A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU
148 g128 GB NVMe4.7"1334x750
78 %
05-2020
Sony Xperia 10 II
SD 665, Adreno 610
151 g128 GB eMMC Flash6"2520x1080
80 %
07-2020
Samsung Galaxy M31
Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3
191 g64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash6.4"2340x1080
83 %
08-2020
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
SD 730G, Adreno 618
204 g64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash6.47"2340x1080
Google Pixel 4a
Google Pixel 4a
Google Pixel 4a
Google Pixel 4a
Google Pixel 4a
Google Pixel 4a
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Google Pixel 4a
Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
668 (592min - 685max) MBit/s ∼100%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 128 GB NVMe
618 (321min - 653max) MBit/s ∼93% -7%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Adreno 618, SD 730G, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
341 (334min - 349max) MBit/s ∼51% -49%
Samsung Galaxy M31
Mali-G72 MP3, Exynos 9611, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
336 (282min - 350max) MBit/s ∼50% -50%
Sony Xperia 10 II
Adreno 610, SD 665, 128 GB eMMC Flash
326 (263min - 342max) MBit/s ∼49% -51%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 1414, n=600)
282 MBit/s ∼42% -58%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Apple iPhone SE 2020
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 128 GB NVMe
818 (400min - 892max) MBit/s ∼100% +32%
Google Pixel 4a
Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
620 (560min - 703max) MBit/s ∼76%
Sony Xperia 10 II
Adreno 610, SD 665, 128 GB eMMC Flash
334 (325min - 339max) MBit/s ∼41% -46%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Adreno 618, SD 730G, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
324 (310min - 330max) MBit/s ∼40% -48%
Samsung Galaxy M31
Mali-G72 MP3, Exynos 9611, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
297 (258min - 312max) MBit/s ∼36% -52%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 1599, n=600)
268 MBit/s ∼33% -57%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700710Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø667 (592-685)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø620 (560-703)
GNSS - Google Pixel 4a
GNSS - Google Pixel 4a
GNSS - Google Pixel 4a
GNSS - Google Pixel 4a
GNSS - Google Pixel 4a
GNSS - Google Pixel 4a
GNSS - Garmin Edge 500
GNSS - Garmin Edge 500
GNSS - Garmin Edge 500
GNSS - Garmin Edge 500
GNSS - Garmin Edge 500
GNSS - Garmin Edge 500

Beeldvergelijking

Bekijk een scène en navigeer binnen het eerste beeld. Eén klik wijzigt het zoomniveau. Eén klik op het ingezoomde beeld opent het origineel in een nieuw venster. Het eerste beeld toont de verschaalde foto van het testtoestel.

Hauptkamera (Hase)Hauptkamera (Blume)Zoom (5-fach)LowLight
klik om beelden te laden
ColorChecker
26.1 ∆E
44.9 ∆E
33.4 ∆E
33.7 ∆E
36.9 ∆E
51.1 ∆E
41.7 ∆E
26.7 ∆E
30.7 ∆E
22.8 ∆E
51 ∆E
52.8 ∆E
23.4 ∆E
37.4 ∆E
25.2 ∆E
52.7 ∆E
31.8 ∆E
36.2 ∆E
54.6 ∆E
54.7 ∆E
44.2 ∆E
34.1 ∆E
23.5 ∆E
13.5 ∆E
ColorChecker Google Pixel 4a: 36.79 ∆E min: 13.46 - max: 54.65 ∆E
ColorChecker
15.6 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
9.9 ∆E
17.8 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
9.9 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
4.2 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
2.8 ∆E
9.5 ∆E
11.8 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
2.6 ∆E
2.8 ∆E
13.6 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
4.2 ∆E
4.2 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
1.9 ∆E
4.1 ∆E
ColorChecker Google Pixel 4a: 7.04 ∆E min: 1.91 - max: 17.76 ∆E
699
cd/m²
688
cd/m²
704
cd/m²
707
cd/m²
705
cd/m²
716
cd/m²
710
cd/m²
713
cd/m²
720
cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 720 cd/m² Gemiddelde: 706.9 cd/m² Minimum: 2.14 cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling: 96 %
Helderheid in Batterij-modus: 705 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Zwart: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 0.9 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.8
ΔE Greyscale 1.3 | 0.64-98 Ø6
95.3% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.26
Google Pixel 4a
OLED, 2340x1080, 5.8
Apple iPhone SE 2020
IPS, 1334x750, 4.7
Sony Xperia 10 II
OLED, 2520x1080, 6
Samsung Galaxy M31
Super AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.4
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.47
Screen
-12%
-46%
-85%
-3%
Brightness middle
705
688
-2%
591
-16%
622
-12%
605
-14%
Brightness
707
659
-7%
590
-17%
615
-13%
608
-14%
Brightness Distribution
96
92
-4%
97
1%
97
1%
95
-1%
Black Level *
0.28
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
0.9
1
-11%
1.42
-58%
2.25
-150%
0.84
7%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
1.9
2.2
-16%
3.83
-102%
6.22
-227%
1.8
5%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
1.3
1.7
-31%
2.4
-85%
2.7
-108%
1.3
-0%
Gamma
2.26 97%
2.25 98%
2.215 99%
2.019 109%
2.211 100%
CCT
6576 99%
6790 96%
9014 72%
6810 95%
6310 103%
Contrast
2457

* ... kleiner is beter

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Om de schermhelderheid te verlagen schakelen sommige laptops het backlight erg snel aan en uit. Dit gebeurt aan een dergelijk hoge frequentie dat het niet zichtbaar is voor het menselijk oog. Als de frequentie te laag is kunnen personen met gevoelige ogen geïrriteerd geraken, hoofdpijn krijgen en zelfs flickering waarnemen.
Screen flickering / PWM waargenomen 255.1 Hz ≤ 99 % helderheid instelling

Het backlight van het scherm flikkert aan 255.1 Hz (hoogstwaarschijnlijk met PWM - Pulse-Width Modulation) aan een helderheid van 99 % en lager. Boven deze helderheid zou er geen flickering / PWM mogen optreden.

De frequentie van 255.1 Hz is relatief hoog en de meeste mensen die gevoelig zijn aan flickering zouden dit dus niet mogen waarnemen of geïrriteerde ogen krijgen. Er zijn echter rapporten die beweren dat sommige mensen toch flickering met 500 Hz en hoger kunnen waarnemen: opgelet dus.

Ter vergelijking: 51 % van alle geteste toestellen maakten geen gebruik van PWM om de schermhelderheid te verlagen. Als het wel werd gebruikt, werd een gemiddelde van 17495 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 2500000) Hz waargenomen.

Responstijd Scherm

De responstijden van het scherm tonen hoe snel het scherm in staat is om van één kleur naar de andere te veranderen. Trage responstijden kunnen aanleiding geven tot 'nabeelden' rond bewegende objecten of het scherm wazig maken (blur). Vooral spelers van snelle 3D-games hebben baat bij een scherm met snelle responstijden.
       Responstijd Zwart naar Wit
3.6 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd↗ 2 ms stijging
↘ 1.6 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde erg snelle responstijden in onze tests en zou zeer geschikt moeten zijn voor snelle games.
Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.8 (minimum) tot 240 (maximum) ms. » 3 % van alle toestellen zijn beter.
Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd beter is dan het gemiddelde (24.4 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.
       Responstijd 50% Grijs naar 80% Grijs
8.8 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd↗ 4.4 ms stijging
↘ 4.4 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde snelle responstijden in onze tests en zou geschikt moeten zijn voor games.
Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.8 (minimum) tot 636 (maximum) ms. » 8 % van alle toestellen zijn beter.
Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd beter is dan het gemiddelde (38.7 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.
Geekbench 5.1 / 5.2
Vulkan Score 5.2 (sorteer op waarde)
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
1030 Points ∼59%
Sony Xperia 10 II
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
457 Points ∼26% -56%
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1345 Points ∼77% +31%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (987 - 1030, n=2)
1009 Points ∼58% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (72 - 4789, n=36)
1750 Points ∼100% +70%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sorteer op waarde)
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
1646 Points ∼50%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
3281 Points ∼100% +99%
Sony Xperia 10 II
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1405 Points ∼43% -15%
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1325 Points ∼40% -20%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
1690 Points ∼52% +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (1646 - 1786, n=5)
1722 Points ∼52% +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (421 - 3531, n=125)
1943 Points ∼59% +18%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sorteer op waarde)
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
549 Points ∼41%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
1336 Points ∼100% +143%
Sony Xperia 10 II
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
310 Points ∼23% -44%
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
348 Points ∼26% -37%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
547 Points ∼41% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (543 - 551, n=5)
547 Points ∼41% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (124 - 1342, n=125)
554 Points ∼41% +1%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sorteer op waarde)
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
8683 Points ∼100%
Sony Xperia 10 II
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
6189 Points ∼71% -29%
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
5587 Points ∼64% -36%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
7628 Points ∼88% -12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (7134 - 8683, n=6)
7715 Points ∼89% -11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2630 - 15299, n=528)
5988 Points ∼69% -31%
Work performance score (sorteer op waarde)
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
10200 Points ∼100%
Sony Xperia 10 II
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
7583 Points ∼74% -26%
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
6202 Points ∼61% -39%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
8941 Points ∼88% -12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (8941 - 10200, n=6)
9422 Points ∼92% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1077 - 19989, n=686)
6572 Points ∼64% -36%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2720 Points ∼100%
Sony Xperia 10 II
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2444 Points ∼90% -10%
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
2163 Points ∼80% -20%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2686 Points ∼99% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (2621 - 2775, n=6)
2720 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1740 - 4061, n=179)
2668 Points ∼98% -2%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2150 Points ∼70%
Sony Xperia 10 II
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
981 Points ∼32% -54%
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1442 Points ∼47% -33%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2143 Points ∼70% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (2143 - 2199, n=6)
2158 Points ∼70% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (203 - 9104, n=179)
3070 Points ∼100% +43%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sorteer op waarde)
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2255 Points ∼82%
Sony Xperia 10 II
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1132 Points ∼41% -50%
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1557 Points ∼57% -31%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2244 Points ∼82% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (2244 - 2310, n=6)
2262 Points ∼83% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (253 - 6977, n=179)
2734 Points ∼100% +21%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3309 Points ∼100%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
2898 Points ∼88% -12%
Sony Xperia 10 II
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2541 Points ∼77% -23%
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
2332 Points ∼70% -30%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3058 Points ∼92% -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (3058 - 3391, n=6)
3218 Points ∼97% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 5780, n=531)
2236 Points ∼68% -32%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2467 Points ∼31%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
7847 Points ∼100% +218%
Sony Xperia 10 II
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
985 Points ∼13% -60%
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1533 Points ∼20% -38%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2466 Points ∼31% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (2425 - 2492, n=6)
2459 Points ∼31% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (75 - 10043, n=531)
2174 Points ∼28% -12%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sorteer op waarde)
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2615 Points ∼46%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
5688 Points ∼100% +118%
Sony Xperia 10 II
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1140 Points ∼20% -56%
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1659 Points ∼29% -37%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2577 Points ∼45% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (2561 - 2701, n=6)
2598 Points ∼46% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (93 - 8386, n=532)
2027 Points ∼36% -22%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3329 Points ∼82%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
4052 Points ∼100% +22%
Sony Xperia 10 II
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2503 Points ∼62% -25%
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
2308 Points ∼57% -31%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3134 Points ∼77% -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (3112 - 3352, n=6)
3213 Points ∼79% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 5765, n=563)
2153 Points ∼53% -35%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3750 Points ∼19%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
20135 Points ∼100% +437%
Sony Xperia 10 II
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1667 Points ∼8% -56%
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1993 Points ∼10% -47%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3751 Points ∼19% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (3646 - 3773, n=6)
3703 Points ∼18% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (70 - 20154, n=563)
2928 Points ∼15% -22%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sorteer op waarde)
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3647 Points ∼34%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
10699 Points ∼100% +193%
Sony Xperia 10 II
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1801 Points ∼17% -51%
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
2055 Points ∼19% -44%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3594 Points ∼34% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (3513 - 3704, n=6)
3586 Points ∼34% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (88 - 10699, n=563)
2457 Points ∼23% -33%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3247 Points ∼100%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
2892 Points ∼89% -11%
Sony Xperia 10 II
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2580 Points ∼79% -21%
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
2258 Points ∼69% -30%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3257 Points ∼100% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (3088 - 3328, n=6)
3216 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (435 - 5209, n=612)
2114 Points ∼65% -35%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2310 Points ∼51%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
4573 Points ∼100% +98%
Sony Xperia 10 II
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
984 Points ∼22% -57%
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1478 Points ∼32% -36%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2298 Points ∼50% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (2237 - 2310, n=6)
2271 Points ∼50% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53 - 9167, n=612)
1833 Points ∼40% -21%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sorteer op waarde)
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2468 Points ∼61%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
4050 Points ∼100% +64%
Sony Xperia 10 II
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1141 Points ∼28% -54%
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1601 Points ∼40% -35%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2459 Points ∼61% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (2388 - 2489, n=6)
2434 Points ∼60% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 7678, n=613)
1743 Points ∼43% -29%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3273 Points ∼99%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
2857 Points ∼87% -13%
Sony Xperia 10 II
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2596 Points ∼79% -21%
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
2195 Points ∼67% -33%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3294 Points ∼100% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (3075 - 3349, n=6)
3235 Points ∼98% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (293 - 5274, n=655)
1985 Points ∼60% -39%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3629 Points ∼39%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
9218 Points ∼100% +154%
Sony Xperia 10 II
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1642 Points ∼18% -55%
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
2020 Points ∼22% -44%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3610 Points ∼39% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (3485 - 3678, n=6)
3567 Points ∼39% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 13305, n=654)
2430 Points ∼26% -33%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sorteer op waarde)
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3543 Points ∼57%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
6168 Points ∼100% +74%
Sony Xperia 10 II
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1788 Points ∼29% -50%
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
2056 Points ∼33% -42%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3594 Points ∼58% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (3399 - 3594, n=6)
3490 Points ∼57% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 9611, n=657)
2083 Points ∼34% -41%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
15527 Points ∼46%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
33851 Points ∼100% +118%
Sony Xperia 10 II
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
20024 Points ∼59% +29%
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
20128 Points ∼59% +30%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
20767 Points ∼61% +34%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (14820 - 22054, n=5)
18710 Points ∼55% +20%
Average of class Smartphone
  (735 - 58293, n=799)
15611 Points ∼46% +1%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sorteer op waarde)
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
53548 Points ∼26%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
209431 Points ∼100% +291%
Sony Xperia 10 II
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
25351 Points ∼12% -53%
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
25160 Points ∼12% -53%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
53194 Points ∼25% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (50829 - 53548, n=5)
52404 Points ∼25% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (536 - 209431, n=797)
27419 Points ∼13% -49%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sorteer op waarde)
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
34678 Points ∼36%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
97290 Points ∼100% +181%
Sony Xperia 10 II
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
23936 Points ∼25% -31%
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
23836 Points ∼24% -31%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
39491 Points ∼41% +14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (33007 - 39608, n=5)
37271 Points ∼38% +7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (662 - 117606, n=797)
21279 Points ∼22% -39%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sorteer op waarde)
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
84 fps ∼34%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
250 fps ∼100% +198%
Sony Xperia 10 II
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
36 fps ∼14% -57%
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
36 fps ∼14% -57%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
83 fps ∼33% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (83 - 86, n=5)
84.4 fps ∼34% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.5 - 322, n=800)
46.1 fps ∼18% -45%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sorteer op waarde)
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
59 fps ∼98%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
60 fps ∼100% +2%
Sony Xperia 10 II
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
30 fps ∼50% -49%
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
32 fps ∼53% -46%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
60 fps ∼100% +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (57 - 60, n=5)
59.2 fps ∼99% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 138, n=809)
31.6 fps ∼53% -46%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sorteer op waarde)
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
41 fps ∼28%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
149 fps ∼100% +263%
Sony Xperia 10 II
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
19 fps ∼13% -54%
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
18 fps ∼12% -56%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
41 fps ∼28% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (41 - 42, n=5)
41.4 fps ∼28% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.8 - 175, n=705)
27.3 fps ∼18% -33%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sorteer op waarde)
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
38 fps ∼63%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
60 fps ∼100% +58%
Sony Xperia 10 II
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
15 fps ∼25% -61%
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
19 fps ∼32% -50%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
39 fps ∼65% +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (36 - 39, n=5)
37.8 fps ∼63% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 115, n=713)
22.8 fps ∼38% -40%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
30 fps ∼32%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
93 fps ∼100% +210%
Sony Xperia 10 II
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
13 fps ∼14% -57%
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
16 fps ∼17% -47%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
30 fps ∼32% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (30 - 30, n=5)
30 fps ∼32% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.87 - 117, n=568)
21.9 fps ∼24% -27%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
28 fps ∼47%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
60 fps ∼100% +114%
Sony Xperia 10 II
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
10 fps ∼17% -64%
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
14 fps ∼23% -50%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
29 fps ∼48% +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (26 - 29, n=5)
27.4 fps ∼46% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 110, n=570)
19.8 fps ∼33% -29%
GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
11 fps ∼18%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
60 fps ∼100% +445%
Sony Xperia 10 II
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
3.9 (2.7min) fps ∼7% -65%
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
5.7 fps ∼10% -48%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
11 fps ∼18% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (10 - 11, n=6)
10.3 fps ∼17% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.61 - 60, n=324)
11.5 fps ∼19% +5%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
6.6 fps ∼21%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
31 fps ∼100% +370%
Sony Xperia 10 II
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2.7 fps ∼9% -59%
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
3.6 fps ∼12% -45%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
6.7 fps ∼22% +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (6.3 - 10, n=6)
7.17 fps ∼23% +9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.21 - 101, n=322)
8.13 fps ∼26% +23%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
17 fps ∼28%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
60 fps ∼100% +253%
Sony Xperia 10 II
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
6.7 fps ∼11% -61%
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
9.4 fps ∼16% -45%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
17 fps ∼28% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (16 - 17, n=6)
16.3 fps ∼27% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 60, n=328)
17.1 fps ∼29% +1%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
18 fps ∼25%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
72 fps ∼100% +300%
Sony Xperia 10 II
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
8.1 fps ∼11% -55%
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
10 fps ∼14% -44%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
18 fps ∼25% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (18 - 18, n=6)
18 fps ∼25% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 257, n=327)
19.7 fps ∼27% +9%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
17 fps ∼29%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
59 fps ∼100% +247%
Sony Xperia 10 II
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
7.1 fps ∼12% -58%
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
10 fps ∼17% -41%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
17 fps ∼29% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (17 - 17, n=5)
17 fps ∼29% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 73, n=493)
14.7 fps ∼25% -14%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
16 fps ∼27%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
60 fps ∼100% +275%
Sony Xperia 10 II
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
5.7 fps ∼10% -64%
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
9.1 fps ∼15% -43%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
17 fps ∼28% +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (15 - 17, n=5)
15.8 fps ∼26% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.1 - 60, n=497)
13 fps ∼22% -19%
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sorteer op waarde)
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
269238 Points ∼55%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
489463 Points ∼100% +82%
Sony Xperia 10 II
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
170126 Points ∼35% -37%
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
187087 Points ∼38% -31%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
273255 Points ∼56% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (251673 - 273255, n=5)
264147 Points ∼54% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53335 - 622888, n=122)
322931 Points ∼66% +20%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sorteer op waarde)
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
1283 Points ∼94%
Sony Xperia 10 II
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
947 Points ∼69% -26%
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
10 Points ∼1% -99%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
1365 Points ∼100% +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (1190 - 1365, n=5)
1284 Points ∼94% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7 - 1745, n=739)
828 Points ∼61% -35%
Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3840 Points ∼99%
Sony Xperia 10 II
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1911 Points ∼49% -50%
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
2168 Points ∼56% -44%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3864 Points ∼99% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (3840 - 3984, n=5)
3885 Points ∼100% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (18 - 16996, n=739)
2557 Points ∼66% -33%
Memory (sorteer op waarde)
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
4544 Points ∼100%
Sony Xperia 10 II
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1804 Points ∼40% -60%
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1775 Points ∼39% -61%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3752 Points ∼83% -17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (3678 - 4544, n=5)
4057 Points ∼89% -11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (21 - 8874, n=739)
1910 Points ∼42% -58%
System (sorteer op waarde)
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
6796 Points ∼100%
Sony Xperia 10 II
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
4911 Points ∼72% -28%
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
4699 Points ∼69% -31%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
6305 Points ∼93% -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (6305 - 6796, n=5)
6582 Points ∼97% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (369 - 14189, n=739)
3510 Points ∼52% -48%
Overall (sorteer op waarde)
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3512 Points ∼100%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
Points ∼0% -100%
Sony Xperia 10 II
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2001 Points ∼57% -43%
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
649 Points ∼18% -82%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3342 Points ∼95% -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (3268 - 3512, n=5)
3385 Points ∼96% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 6273, n=739)
1797 Points ∼51% -49%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone SE 2020 (Safari Mobile 13.1)
139.668 Points ∼100% +192%
Google Pixel 4a (Chrome 85)
47.798 Points ∼34%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (45.8 - 50.6, n=5)
47.3 Points ∼34% -1%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite (Chrome 83.0.4103.106)
46.148 Points ∼33% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (9.13 - 140, n=197)
41 Points ∼29% -14%
Samsung Galaxy M31 (Chrome 83)
27.807 Points ∼20% -42%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Apple iPhone SE 2020 (Safari Mobile 13.1)
278.62 Points ∼100% +218%
Google Pixel 4a (Chrome 85)
87.731 Points ∼31%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (79.2 - 87.7, n=5)
84 Points ∼30% -4%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite (Chrome 83.0.4103.106)
82.347 Points ∼30% -6%
Sony Xperia 10 II (Chrome 84)
49.315 Points ∼18% -44%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 302, n=628)
47.8 Points ∼17% -46%
Samsung Galaxy M31 (Chrome 83)
47.5 Points ∼17% -46%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Apple iPhone SE 2020 (Safari Mobile 13.1)
158 runs/min ∼100% +257%
Google Pixel 4a (Chrome 85)
44.2 runs/min ∼28%
Average of class Smartphone (6.42 - 158, n=178)
43.1 runs/min ∼27% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (40.4 - 44.2, n=5)
43 runs/min ∼27% -3%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite (Chrome 83.0.4103.106)
40.4 runs/min ∼26% -9%
Samsung Galaxy M31 (Chome 83)
29.4 runs/min ∼19% -33%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Apple iPhone SE 2020 (Safari Mobile 13.1)
146 Points ∼100% +106%
Google Pixel 4a (Chrome 85)
71 Points ∼49%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (66 - 77, n=5)
70.4 Points ∼48% -1%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite (Chrome 83.0.4103.106)
70 Points ∼48% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 184, n=266)
69.9 Points ∼48% -2%
Samsung Galaxy M31 (Chrome 83)
56 Points ∼38% -21%
Sony Xperia 10 II (Chrome 84)
47 Points ∼32% -34%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone SE 2020 (Safari Mobile 13.1)
48991 Points ∼100% +176%
Google Pixel 4a (Chrome 85)
17768 Points ∼36%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (16197 - 17768, n=5)
16856 Points ∼34% -5%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite (Chrome 83.0.4103.106)
16197 Points ∼33% -9%
Samsung Galaxy M31 (Chrome 83)
10434 Points ∼21% -41%
Sony Xperia 10 II (Chrome 84)
9671 Points ∼20% -46%
Average of class Smartphone (894 - 49388, n=797)
7984 Points ∼16% -55%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (1854 - 59466, n=823)
9690 ms * ∼100% -228%
Samsung Galaxy M31 (Chrome 83)
4786.2 ms * ∼49% -62%
Sony Xperia 10 II (Chrome 84)
4629.3 ms * ∼48% -57%
Google Pixel 4a (Chrome 85)
2949.9 ms * ∼30%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite (Chrome 83.0.4103.106)
2940.5 ms * ∼30% -0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (2770 - 3054, n=5)
2900 ms * ∼30% +2%
Apple iPhone SE 2020 (Safari Mobile 13.1)
549.9 ms * ∼6% +81%

* ... kleiner is beter

Google Pixel 4aSony Xperia 10 IISamsung Galaxy M31Xiaomi Mi Note 10 LiteAverage 128 GB UFS 2.0 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-47%
-13%
-16%
-25%
-55%
Random Write 4KB
187.39
56.74
-70%
152.4
-19%
125.75
-33%
84.8 (13.5 - 187, n=23)
-55%
37.1 (0.14 - 319, n=895)
-80%
Random Read 4KB
162.89
76.83
-53%
128.9
-21%
134.57
-17%
125 (88.4 - 173, n=23)
-23%
60.3 (1.59 - 324, n=895)
-63%
Sequential Write 256KB
246.79
188.21
-24%
221.7
-10%
213.22
-14%
196 (143 - 257, n=23)
-21%
131 (2.99 - 911, n=895)
-47%
Sequential Read 256KB
502.06
293.49
-42%
489.5
-3%
501.29
0%
495 (409 - 733, n=23)
-1%
348 (12.1 - 1802, n=895)
-31%
010203040506070Tooltip
; PUBG Mobile; Smooth: Ø39.7 (36-42)
; PUBG Mobile; HD: Ø29.8 (17-31)
; Arena of Valor; min: Ø60.1 (60-61)
; Arena of Valor; high HD: Ø60 (54-61)
Max. Belasting
 36.5 °C35.5 °C34 °C 
 37.9 °C37.8 °C35.5 °C 
 35.2 °C38.2 °C35.4 °C 
Maximum: 38.2 °C
Gemiddelde: 36.2 °C
33.3 °C35 °C34.5 °C
32.3 °C37.1 °C36.8 °C
30.7 °C33.2 °C36.8 °C
Maximum: 37.1 °C
Gemiddelde: 34.4 °C
Stroomadapter (max.)  25 °C | Kamertemperatuur 21.8 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 36.2 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 33 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38.2 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 37.1 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.4 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 33 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2036.931.8252919.83121.924.4402220.95029.934.8632220.18019.321.610016.3321251441.716016.951.320014.951.725014.155.531510604001161.150011.76563010.966.180011.967.910001171.1125010.269.9160011.473.3200012.875.4250012.973.5315012.57540001379.1500013.178630013.470.7800015.768.71000013.566.6125001470.21600013.771.1SPL24.886N0.663median 13median 68.7Delta1.16.132.827.426.227.423.322.921.9252825.819.924.419.125.519.928.616.53919.64917.549.317.54813.951.513.952.815.858.815.260.71466.31468.613.97213.473.913.874.614.375.91477.114.576.914.677.914.57614.772.615.166.51558.314.847.126.586.40.862.5median 14.6median 66.3112.6hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseGoogle Pixel 4aApple iPhone SE 2020
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Google Pixel 4a audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 14% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Apple iPhone SE 2020 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.3% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.4% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 37% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 51% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 60% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 32% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Stroomgebruik
Uit / Standbydarklight 0.01 / 0.21 Watt
Inactiefdarkmidlight 0.49 / 0.96 / 1 Watt
Belasting midlight 3.11 / 5.23 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Google Pixel 4a
3140 mAh
Apple iPhone SE 2020
1822 mAh
Sony Xperia 10 II
3600 mAh
Samsung Galaxy M31
6000 mAh
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
5260 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-14%
-118%
-166%
-39%
-45%
-64%
Idle Minimum *
0.49
0.44
10%
1.5
-206%
1.6
-227%
0.8
-63%
0.698 (0.49 - 0.8, n=5)
-42%
0.891 (0.2 - 3.4, n=897)
-82%
Idle Average *
0.96
1.56
-63%
2.1
-119%
2.3
-140%
1.1
-15%
1.362 (0.96 - 1.8, n=5)
-42%
1.756 (0.6 - 6.2, n=896)
-83%
Idle Maximum *
1
1.63
-63%
2.8
-180%
3.7
-270%
1.8
-80%
1.712 (1 - 2.2, n=5)
-71%
2.04 (0.74 - 6.6, n=897)
-104%
Load Average *
3.11
2.32
25%
4.5
-45%
6.7
-115%
3.7
-19%
4.54 (3.11 - 5.38, n=5)
-46%
4.12 (0.8 - 10.8, n=891)
-32%
Load Maximum *
5.23
4.12
21%
7.2
-38%
9.4
-80%
6.1
-17%
6.59 (5.23 - 7.5, n=5)
-26%
6.11 (1.2 - 14.2, n=891)
-17%

* ... kleiner is beter

Batterijduur
Inactief (zonder WLAN, minimale helderheid)
37h 50min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
11h 9min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
17h 25min
Belast (maximale helderheid)
3h 45min
Google Pixel 4a
3140 mAh
Apple iPhone SE 2020
1822 mAh
Sony Xperia 10 II
3600 mAh
Samsung Galaxy M31
6000 mAh
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
5260 mAh
Batterijduur
-21%
11%
47%
36%
Reader / Idle
2270
1938
-15%
2456
8%
2249
-1%
H.264
1045
681
-35%
1432
37%
1370
31%
WiFi v1.3
669
694
4%
743
11%
1324
98%
1095
64%
Load
225
143
-36%
326
45%
337
50%

Pro

+ compact formaat
+ goede cameraprestaties
+ goede batterijduur
+ degelijke systeemprestaties
+ USB 3.2

Contra

- geen microSD-kaartlezer
- scherm flikkert met een lage frequentie
- geen gezichtsherkenning

Conclusie - De koning van de mid-range

Getest: Google Pixel 4a. Testtoestel voorzien door: Google Germany
Getest: Google Pixel 4a. Testtoestel voorzien door: Google Germany

Dit is de verkorte versie van het originele artikel. Het volledige, Engelse testrapport vind je hier.

Met de Pixel 4a slaagt Google er in om een prima smartphone te creëren die veel sterke punten heeft en slechts kleine minpunten. De algemene en batterijprestaties zijn goed voor een smartphone uit het middensegment, en de 128 GB interne opslagruimte zorgt ervoor dat het ontbreken van een microSD-kaartsleuf niet zo'n groot probleem is. Bovendien zijn de cameraprestaties bijna vergelijkbaar met de "grote" Pixel 4-toestellen en zijn ze ongeëvenaard in deze prijsklasse. Het schermformaat van "slechts" 5,8 inch maakt het ook een van de compactere smartphones die momenteel verkrijgbaar zijn.

De Pixel 4a is een goedkope Google-smartphone die vooral liefhebbers van kleine smartphones moet aanspreken.

De Pixel 4a verdient ook lof omwille van zijn erg heldere scherm. Dankzij het OLED-paneel biedt het eveneens levendige kleuren en een uitstekend contrast. Gebruikers met gevoelige ogen zullen echter het brede frequentiebereik opmerken waarin het scherm flikkert. Vanuit een volledig subjectief standpunt heeft de auteur van dit testrapport echter al smartphones gebruikt die de ogen meer belasten dan het geval was met de Pixel 4a, ondanks dat ze flikkeren op aanzienlijk hogere frequenties. Uiteindelijk kan alleen trial-and-error je hierbij helpen.

Google Pixel 4a - 21-09-2020 v7
Mike Wobker

Behuizing
80%
Toetsenbord
65 / 75 → 87%
Aanwijsapparaat
94%
Aansluitmogelijkheden
51 / 70 → 72%
Gewicht
93%
Batterij
90%
Beeldscherm
92%
Gaming-performance
28 / 64 → 43%
Applicatie-performance
72 / 86 → 83%
Temperatuur
92%
Luidheid
100%
Audio
78 / 90 → 87%
Camera
67%
Gemiddelde
77%
84%
Smartphone - Gewogen Gemiddelde

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Overzichten en testrapporten over laptops en mobieltjes > Testrapporten > Kort testrapport Google Pixel 4a smartphone: Het draait niet om de megapixels
Mike Wobker, 2020-09-23 (Update: 2020-09-23)