Notebookcheck

Kort testrapport Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Smartphone: Prijs-prestaties-topper

Ingetogen. Aangezien de Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite bijna net zo krachtig is en bijna dezelfde functies heeft als zijn high-end zustermodel Mi Note 10, is de naam "Lite" meer verwarrend dan informatief. Xiaomi heeft alleen de cameramodule aangeraakt, die nog steeds een respectabele resolutie biedt van 64 MP in plaats van 108 MP. De Mi Note 10 Lite is echter ook aanzienlijk goedkoper - in dit opzicht is de "Lite"-toevoeging wel passend.
Manuel Masiero, 👁 Florian Schmitt, Andrea Grüblinger,
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite (Mi Note Serie)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G 8 x 2.2 GHz, Kryo 470 Gold / Silver
Grafische kaart
Geheugen
6144 MB 
, LPDDR4X
Beeldscherm
6.47 inch 19.5:9, 2340 x 1080 pixel 398 PPI, capacitief, AMOLED, Corning Gorilla Glass 5, FHD+, 3D curved, HDR10, glimmend: ja, HDR, 60 Hz
Opslag
64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 64 GB 
, 108.6 GB beschikbaar
Verbindingen
1 USB 2.0, Audio Verbindingen: 3.5-mm-koptelefoon, 1 Vingerafdruklezer, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensoren: Vingerafdruksensor, vibratiemotor, IR blaster, ambient light sensor, accelerometer, gyroscope, electronic compass, aptX, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, USB OTB, Wi-Fi Direct, Wi-Fi display, DRM Widevine L1
Netwerkmogelijkheden
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.0, GSM (band 2, 3, 5, 8), UMTS (band 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 8, 19), LTE (band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41), hoofd SAR 1,011 W/kg, lichaam SAR 1,385 W/kg, Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Afmetingen
hoogte x breedte x diepte (in mm): 9.67 x 157.8 x 74.2
Batterij
5260 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Besturingssysteem
Android 10
Camera
Primary Camera: 64 MPix Quad-camera: 64-MP hoofdcamera (Sony IMX686, f/1.89, 1/1.73", 0.8 µm) + 8-MP ultra-groothoek-camera (f/2.2, 1/4.0", 1.12 µm) + 5-MP dieptesensor (f/2.4, 1/1.5", 1.12 µm) + 2-MP macro-camera (f/2.4, 1/1.4", 1.75 µm), video's aan max. [email protected]
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix f/2.48, 1/3.06" 1.0 µm, Videos aan max. [email protected]
Bijkomende functionaliteiten
Luidsprekers: Mono-luidsprekers aan onderzijde, Toetsenbord: virtual, modular 30-watt charger, USB cable (Type-C to Type-A), headphones, SIM tool, protective case, user guide, warranty card, MIUI 11, 24 Maanden Garantie, fanless
Gewicht
204 g, Voeding: 85 g
Prijs
400 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Concurrerende Toestellen

Evaluatie
Datum
Model
Gewicht
Drive
Formaat
Resolutie
Best Price
83 %
08-2020
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
SD 730G, Adreno 618
204 g64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.47"2340x1080
82 %
07-2020
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6
189 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.5"2400x1080
81 %
03-2020
Oppo Reno2
SD 730G, Adreno 618
189 g256 GB UFS 2.0 Flash6.5"2400x1080
80 %
01-2020
Samsung Galaxy A51
Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3
172 g128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash6.5"2400x1080
83 %
12-2019
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
SD 730G, Adreno 618
208 g128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash6.47"2340x1080

Formaat Vergelijking

162.31 mm 75 mm 8.58 mm 189 g160 mm 74.3 mm 9 mm 189 g157.8 mm 74.2 mm 9.7 mm 208 g157.8 mm 74.2 mm 9.67 mm 204 g158.5 mm 73.6 mm 7.9 mm 172 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Oppo Reno2
Adreno 618, SD 730G, 256 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
618 (532min - 671max) MBit/s ∼100% +81%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Adreno 618, SD 730G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
341 (334min - 349max) MBit/s ∼55%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
Mali-G57 MP6, Kirin 820, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
333 (319min - 345max) MBit/s ∼54% -2%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
331 (317min - 341max) MBit/s ∼54% -3%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Mali-G72 MP3, Exynos 9611, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
298 (185min - 350max) MBit/s ∼48% -13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 1414, n=584)
274 MBit/s ∼44% -20%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Oppo Reno2
Adreno 618, SD 730G, 256 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
355 (187min - 387max) MBit/s ∼100% +10%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
327 (321min - 333max) MBit/s ∼92% +1%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Adreno 618, SD 730G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
324 (310min - 330max) MBit/s ∼91%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Mali-G72 MP3, Exynos 9611, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
297 (189min - 335max) MBit/s ∼84% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 1599, n=584)
261 MBit/s ∼74% -19%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
Mali-G57 MP6, Kirin 820, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
255 (234min - 277max) MBit/s ∼72% -21%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø341 (334-349)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø324 (310-330)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite: overzicht
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite: overzicht
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite: brug
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite: brug
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite: bocht
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite: bocht
Garmin Edge 520: overzicht
Garmin Edge 520: overzicht
Garmin Edge 520: brug
Garmin Edge 520: brug
Garmin Edge 520: bocht
Garmin Edge 520: bocht

Beeldvergelijking

Bekijk een scène en navigeer binnen het eerste beeld. Eén klik wijzigt het zoomniveau. Eén klik op het ingezoomde beeld opent het origineel in een nieuw venster. Het eerste beeld toont de verschaalde foto van het testtoestel.

Tageslicht-Szene 1Tageslicht-Szene 2WeitwinkelLowlight
ColorChecker
28.1 ∆E
48.1 ∆E
36.5 ∆E
35.4 ∆E
40.5 ∆E
55.6 ∆E
48.2 ∆E
31.8 ∆E
33.9 ∆E
25.4 ∆E
56.5 ∆E
58.7 ∆E
29.1 ∆E
45 ∆E
30.7 ∆E
64.2 ∆E
36.7 ∆E
41.9 ∆E
64.7 ∆E
64.6 ∆E
48.6 ∆E
35.7 ∆E
23.5 ∆E
13.2 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite: 41.52 ∆E min: 13.2 - max: 64.74 ∆E
ColorChecker
13.8 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
11.5 ∆E
16 ∆E
9.5 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
7.4 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
11 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
2 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
10.7 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
1.2 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
9.3 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
2.1 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite: 7.38 ∆E min: 1.19 - max: 16.03 ∆E
598
cd/m²
596
cd/m²
615
cd/m²
595
cd/m²
605
cd/m²
623
cd/m²
605
cd/m²
612
cd/m²
626
cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 626 cd/m² Gemiddelde: 608.3 cd/m² Minimum: 2.81 cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling: 95 %
Helderheid in Batterij-modus: 605 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Zwart: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 0.84 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.8
ΔE Greyscale 1.3 | 0.64-98 Ø6
100% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.211
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.47
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
IPS, 2400x1080, 6.5
Oppo Reno2
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.5
Samsung Galaxy A51
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.5
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.47
Screen
-80%
-132%
-105%
-153%
Brightness middle
605
466
-23%
679
12%
589
-3%
625
3%
Brightness
608
457
-25%
683
12%
589
-3%
607
0%
Brightness Distribution
95
91
-4%
98
3%
94
-1%
89
-6%
Black Level *
0.61
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
0.84
2.2
-162%
3.5
-317%
2.22
-164%
4.38
-421%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
1.8
4.6
-156%
6.8
-278%
8.24
-358%
6.83
-279%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
1.3
2.7
-108%
4.2
-223%
2.6
-100%
4.1
-215%
Gamma
2.211 100%
2.24 98%
2.27 97%
2.111 104%
2.251 98%
CCT
6310 103%
6633 98%
6532 100%
6508 100%
7251 90%
Contrast
764

* ... kleiner is beter

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Om de schermhelderheid te verlagen schakelen sommige laptops het backlight erg snel aan en uit. Dit gebeurt aan een dergelijk hoge frequentie dat het niet zichtbaar is voor het menselijk oog. Als de frequentie te laag is kunnen personen met gevoelige ogen geïrriteerd geraken, hoofdpijn krijgen en zelfs flickering waarnemen.
Screen flickering / PWM waargenomen 176.1 Hz

Het backlight van het scherm flikkert aan 176.1 Hz (hoogstwaarschijnlijk met PWM - Pulse-Width Modulation) .

De frequentie van 176.1 Hz is redelijk laag en de meeste mensen die gevoelig zijn aan flickering kunnen dit dus waarnemen of geïrriteerde ogen krijgen (gebruikmakend van de vermelde helderheid en lager).

Ter vergelijking: 51 % van alle geteste toestellen maakten geen gebruik van PWM om de schermhelderheid te verlagen. Als het wel werd gebruikt, werd een gemiddelde van 17699 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 2500000) Hz waargenomen.

Responstijd Scherm

De responstijden van het scherm tonen hoe snel het scherm in staat is om van één kleur naar de andere te veranderen. Trage responstijden kunnen aanleiding geven tot 'nabeelden' rond bewegende objecten of het scherm wazig maken (blur). Vooral spelers van snelle 3D-games hebben baat bij een scherm met snelle responstijden.
       Responstijd Zwart naar Wit
8 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd↗ 3 ms stijging
↘ 5 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde snelle responstijden in onze tests en zou geschikt moeten zijn voor games.
Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.8 (minimum) tot 240 (maximum) ms. » 7 % van alle toestellen zijn beter.
Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd beter is dan het gemiddelde (24.4 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.
       Responstijd 50% Grijs naar 80% Grijs
10 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd↗ 5 ms stijging
↘ 5 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde prima responstijden in onze tests maar is misschien wat te traag voor competitieve games.
Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.8 (minimum) tot 636 (maximum) ms. » 9 % van alle toestellen zijn beter.
Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd beter is dan het gemiddelde (38.8 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.
Geekbench 5.1 / 5.2
Vulkan Score 5.1 (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
903 Points ∼42%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
2137 Points ∼100% +137%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
812 Points ∼38% -10%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
920 Points ∼43% +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (812 - 920, n=3)
878 Points ∼41% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (70 - 4043, n=66)
1633 Points ∼76% +81%
OpenCL Score 5.1 (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
1090 Points ∼62%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
Points ∼0% -100%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
1080 Points ∼61% -1%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
1127 Points ∼64% +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (1080 - 1127, n=3)
1099 Points ∼62% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (272 - 4739, n=61)
1759 Points ∼100% +61%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
1690 Points ∼69%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
2434 Points ∼100% +44%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
1762 Points ∼72% +4%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
1727 Points ∼71% +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (1646 - 1762, n=4)
1706 Points ∼70% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (421 - 3531, n=108)
1955 Points ∼80% +16%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
547 Points ∼85%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
642 Points ∼100% +17%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
547 Points ∼85% 0%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
543 Points ∼85% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (543 - 549, n=4)
547 Points ∼85% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (124 - 1342, n=108)
555 Points ∼86% +1%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
7628 Points ∼80%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
9527 Points ∼100% +25%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
7134 Points ∼75% -6%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
5649 Points ∼59% -26%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
7558 Points ∼79% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (7134 - 8683, n=5)
7711 Points ∼81% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2630 - 15299, n=512)
5918 Points ∼62% -22%
Work performance score (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
8941 Points ∼68%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
13099 Points ∼100% +47%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
9145 Points ∼70% +2%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
6416 Points ∼49% -28%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
9052 Points ∼69% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (8941 - 10200, n=5)
9316 Points ∼71% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1077 - 19989, n=670)
6486 Points ∼50% -27%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2686 Points ∼81%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
3331 Points ∼100% +24%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
2621 Points ∼79% -2%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2161 Points ∼65% -20%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2768 Points ∼83% +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (2621 - 2768, n=5)
2709 Points ∼81% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1740 - 4061, n=165)
2653 Points ∼80% -1%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2143 Points ∼47%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
4544 Points ∼100% +112%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
2155 Points ∼47% +1%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1438 Points ∼32% -33%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2153 Points ∼47% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (2143 - 2155, n=5)
2149 Points ∼47% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (203 - 8783, n=165)
2966 Points ∼65% +38%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2244 Points ∼53%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
4204 Points ∼100% +87%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
2244 Points ∼53% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1554 Points ∼37% -31%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2265 Points ∼54% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (2244 - 2265, n=5)
2253 Points ∼54% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (253 - 6754, n=165)
2665 Points ∼63% +19%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3058 Points ∼66%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
4642 Points ∼100% +52%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
3162 Points ∼68% +3%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2311 Points ∼50% -24%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3188 Points ∼69% +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (3058 - 3309, n=5)
3184 Points ∼69% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 5780, n=515)
2200 Points ∼47% -28%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2466 Points ∼50%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
4906 Points ∼100% +99%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
2434 Points ∼50% -1%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1530 Points ∼31% -38%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2425 Points ∼49% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (2425 - 2492, n=5)
2457 Points ∼50% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (75 - 9567, n=515)
2109 Points ∼43% -14%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2577 Points ∼53%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
4845 Points ∼100% +88%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
2565 Points ∼53% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1654 Points ∼34% -36%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2561 Points ∼53% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (2561 - 2615, n=5)
2577 Points ∼53% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (93 - 8269, n=516)
1970 Points ∼41% -24%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3134 Points ∼68%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
4637 Points ∼100% +48%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
3112 Points ∼67% -1%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2336 Points ∼50% -25%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3193 Points ∼69% +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (3112 - 3329, n=5)
3185 Points ∼69% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 5765, n=546)
2112 Points ∼46% -33%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3751 Points ∼59%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
6327 Points ∼100% +69%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
3647 Points ∼58% -3%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1993 Points ∼31% -47%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3646 Points ∼58% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (3646 - 3751, n=5)
3688 Points ∼58% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (70 - 20154, n=546)
2826 Points ∼45% -25%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3594 Points ∼61%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
5853 Points ∼100% +63%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
3513 Points ∼60% -2%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2060 Points ∼35% -43%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3535 Points ∼60% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (3513 - 3647, n=5)
3562 Points ∼61% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (88 - 10699, n=546)
2374 Points ∼41% -34%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3257 Points ∼81%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
4031 Points ∼100% +24%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
3088 Points ∼77% -5%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2217 Points ∼55% -32%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3171 Points ∼79% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (3088 - 3257, n=5)
3193 Points ∼79% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (435 - 5209, n=596)
2084 Points ∼52% -36%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2298 Points ∼48%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
4804 Points ∼100% +109%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
2243 Points ∼47% -2%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1473 Points ∼31% -36%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2237 Points ∼47% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (2237 - 2310, n=5)
2267 Points ∼47% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53 - 8469, n=596)
1777 Points ∼37% -23%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2459 Points ∼53%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
4608 Points ∼100% +87%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
2388 Points ∼52% -3%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1592 Points ∼35% -35%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2394 Points ∼52% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (2388 - 2468, n=5)
2423 Points ∼53% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 7400, n=597)
1694 Points ∼37% -31%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3294 Points ∼81%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
4042 Points ∼100% +23%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
3075 Points ∼76% -7%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2225 Points ∼55% -32%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3191 Points ∼79% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (3075 - 3294, n=5)
3212 Points ∼79% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (293 - 5274, n=638)
1949 Points ∼48% -41%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3610 Points ∼59%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
6158 Points ∼100% +71%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
3504 Points ∼57% -3%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2027 Points ∼33% -44%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3498 Points ∼57% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (3485 - 3629, n=5)
3545 Points ∼58% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 12611, n=637)
2339 Points ∼38% -35%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3594 Points ∼65%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
5516 Points ∼100% +53%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
3399 Points ∼62% -5%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2068 Points ∼37% -42%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3425 Points ∼62% -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (3399 - 3594, n=5)
3477 Points ∼63% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 9549, n=640)
2011 Points ∼36% -44%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
20767 Points ∼50%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
41610 Points ∼100% +100%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
14820 Points ∼36% -29%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
20393 Points ∼49% -2%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
22054 Points ∼53% +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (14820 - 22054, n=4)
18292 Points ∼44% -12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (735 - 58293, n=784)
15422 Points ∼37% -26%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
53194 Points ∼93%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
57067 Points ∼100% +7%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
50829 Points ∼89% -4%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
25086 Points ∼44% -53%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
51267 Points ∼90% -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (50829 - 53548, n=4)
52210 Points ∼91% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (536 - 209431, n=782)
26542 Points ∼47% -50%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
39491 Points ∼75%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
52715 Points ∼100% +33%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
33007 Points ∼63% -16%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
23866 Points ∼45% -40%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
39608 Points ∼75% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (33007 - 39608, n=4)
36696 Points ∼70% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (662 - 112989, n=782)
20755 Points ∼39% -47%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
83 fps ∼74%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
112 fps ∼100% +35%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
85 fps ∼76% +2%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
46 fps ∼41% -45%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
84 fps ∼75% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (83 - 85, n=4)
84 fps ∼75% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.5 - 322, n=786)
44.9 fps ∼40% -46%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
60 fps ∼100%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
60 fps ∼100% 0%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
60 fps ∼100% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
40 fps ∼67% -33%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
60 fps ∼100% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (59 - 60, n=4)
59.8 fps ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 138, n=795)
31 fps ∼52% -48%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
41 fps ∼59%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
69 fps ∼100% +68%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
42 fps ∼61% +2%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
24 fps ∼35% -41%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
41 fps ∼59% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (41 - 42, n=4)
41.3 fps ∼60% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.8 - 175, n=691)
26.5 fps ∼38% -35%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
39 fps ∼71%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
55 fps ∼100% +41%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
36 fps ∼65% -8%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
23 fps ∼42% -41%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
38 fps ∼69% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (36 - 39, n=4)
37.8 fps ∼69% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 115, n=699)
22.3 fps ∼41% -43%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
30 fps ∼64%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
47 fps ∼100% +57%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
30 fps ∼64% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
15 fps ∼32% -50%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
30 fps ∼64% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (30 - 30, n=4)
30 fps ∼64% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.87 - 117, n=554)
21.3 fps ∼45% -29%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
29 fps ∼73%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
40 fps ∼100% +38%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
26 fps ∼65% -10%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
14 fps ∼35% -52%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
27 fps ∼68% -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (26 - 29, n=4)
27.5 fps ∼69% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 110, n=556)
19.4 fps ∼49% -33%
GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
11 fps ∼65%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
17 fps ∼100% +55%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
10 fps ∼59% -9%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
5.5 fps ∼32% -50%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
10 fps ∼59% -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (10 - 11, n=5)
10.4 fps ∼61% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.61 - 60, n=307)
11.3 fps ∼66% +3%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
6.7 fps ∼56%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
12 fps ∼100% +79%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
6.7 fps ∼56% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
3.5 fps ∼29% -48%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
10 fps ∼83% +49%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (6.6 - 10, n=5)
7.34 fps ∼61% +10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.21 - 101, n=305)
8.07 fps ∼67% +20%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
17 fps ∼65%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
26 fps ∼100% +53%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
16 fps ∼62% -6%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
9.1 fps ∼35% -46%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
16 fps ∼62% -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (16 - 17, n=5)
16.4 fps ∼63% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 60, n=311)
16.8 fps ∼65% -1%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
18 fps ∼58%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
31 fps ∼100% +72%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
18 fps ∼58% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
10 fps ∼32% -44%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
18 fps ∼58% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (18 - 18, n=5)
18 fps ∼58% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 257, n=310)
19.4 fps ∼63% +8%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
17 fps ∼63%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
27 fps ∼100% +59%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
17 fps ∼63% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
10 fps ∼37% -41%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
17 fps ∼63% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (17 - 17, n=4)
17 fps ∼63% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 73, n=479)
14.3 fps ∼53% -16%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
17 fps ∼74%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
23 fps ∼100% +35%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
15 fps ∼65% -12%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
8.6 fps ∼37% -49%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
15 fps ∼65% -12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (15 - 17, n=4)
15.8 fps ∼69% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.1 - 60, n=483)
12.7 fps ∼55% -25%
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
273255 Points ∼74%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
369207 Points ∼100% +35%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
260154 Points ∼70% -5%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
181295 Points ∼49% -34%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
266417 Points ∼72% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (260154 - 273255, n=4)
267266 Points ∼72% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53335 - 607937, n=108)
317934 Points ∼86% +16%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Huawei P40 Lite 5G (Huawei Browser 10.0.2.331)
54.792 Points ∼100% +19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (45.8 - 47.8, n=4)
46.5 Points ∼85% +1%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite (Chrome 83.0.4103.106)
46.148 Points ∼84%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 (Chrome 78)
46.038 Points ∼84% 0%
Oppo Reno2 (Chrome 80)
45.819 Points ∼84% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (9.13 - 140, n=185)
40.6 Points ∼74% -12%
Samsung Galaxy A51 (Chrome 79)
27.681 Points ∼51% -40%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Huawei P40 Lite 5G (Huawei Browser 10.0.2.331)
96.293 Points ∼100% +17%
Oppo Reno2 (Chrome 80)
83.953 Points ∼87% +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (79.2 - 87.7, n=4)
83.3 Points ∼87% +1%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite (Chrome 83.0.4103.106)
82.347 Points ∼86%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 (Chrome 78)
79.228 Points ∼82% -4%
Samsung Galaxy A51 (Chrome 79)
51.257 Points ∼53% -38%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 302, n=616)
47.1 Points ∼49% -43%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Huawei P40 Lite 5G (Huawei Browser 10.0.2.331)
49.5 runs/min ∼100% +23%
Oppo Reno2 (Chrome 80)
43.6 runs/min ∼88% +8%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 (Chrome 78)
43.3 runs/min ∼87% +7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (40.4 - 44.2, n=4)
42.9 runs/min ∼87% +6%
Average of class Smartphone (6.42 - 158, n=168)
42.9 runs/min ∼87% +6%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite (Chrome 83.0.4103.106)
40.4 runs/min ∼82%
Samsung Galaxy A51 (Chrome 79)
29.1 runs/min ∼59% -28%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Huawei P40 Lite 5G (Huawei Browser 10.0.2.331)
115 Points ∼100% +64%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 (Chrome 78)
77 Points ∼67% +10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (66 - 77, n=4)
71 Points ∼62% +1%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite (Chrome 83.0.4103.106)
70 Points ∼61%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 184, n=252)
69.8 Points ∼61% 0%
Oppo Reno2 (Chrome 80)
66 Points ∼57% -6%
Samsung Galaxy A51 (Chrome 79)
57 Points ∼50% -19%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Huawei P40 Lite 5G (Huawei Browser 10.0.2.331)
19727 Points ∼100% +22%
Oppo Reno2 (Chrome 80)
17345 Points ∼88% +7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (16197 - 17768, n=4)
16888 Points ∼86% +4%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 (Chrome 78)
16241 Points ∼82% 0%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite (Chrome 83.0.4103.106)
16197 Points ∼82%
Samsung Galaxy A51 (Chrome 79)
10194 Points ∼52% -37%
Average of class Smartphone (894 - 49388, n=783)
7840 Points ∼40% -52%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (1914 - 59466, n=809)
9777 ms * ∼100% -232%
Samsung Galaxy A51 (Chrome 79)
4375.1 ms * ∼45% -49%
Oppo Reno2 (Chrome 80)
3054.3 ms * ∼31% -4%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite (Chrome 83.0.4103.106)
2940.5 ms * ∼30%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (2770 - 3054, n=4)
2929 ms * ∼30% -0%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 (Chrome 78)
2769.8 ms * ∼28% +6%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G (Huawei Browser 10.0.2.331)
2254.1 ms * ∼23% +23%

* ... kleiner is beter

Xiaomi Mi Note 10 LiteHuawei P40 Lite 5GOppo Reno2Samsung Galaxy A51Xiaomi Mi Note 10Average 64 GB UFS 2.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
44%
-22%
-12%
-4%
-3%
-50%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
67.67 (NM Card)
53.54 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
60.1 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
51.4 (17.1 - 71.9, n=31)
51 (1.7 - 87.1, n=527)
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
83.35 (NM Card)
74.52 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
73 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
67.5 (18 - 87.1, n=31)
69 (8.1 - 96.5, n=527)
Random Write 4KB
125.75
249.66
99%
22
-83%
104.4
-17%
118.9
-5%
69 (8.77 - 165, n=43)
-45%
35.4 (0.14 - 319, n=879)
-72%
Random Read 4KB
134.57
146.07
9%
144.24
7%
110.8
-18%
106.2
-21%
134 (78.2 - 173, n=43)
0%
58.7 (1.59 - 324, n=879)
-56%
Sequential Write 256KB
213.22
188.01
-12%
201.78
-5%
184.9
-13%
243.6
14%
199 (133 - 388, n=43)
-7%
127 (2.99 - 911, n=879)
-40%
Sequential Read 256KB
501.29
905.47
81%
469.31
-6%
496.1
-1%
480.5
-4%
703 (476 - 895, n=43)
40%
339 (12.1 - 1802, n=879)
-32%
010203040Tooltip
; PUBG Mobile; 0.19.0: Ø29.6 (10-31)
; Asphalt 9: Legends; 2.3.4a: Ø29.8 (24-31)
Max. Belasting
 37.3 °C40.1 °C39.4 °C 
 37.6 °C39.3 °C39.8 °C 
 37.6 °C38.5 °C39.1 °C 
Maximum: 40.1 °C
Gemiddelde: 38.7 °C
35.1 °C36.8 °C36.6 °C
35.3 °C36 °C35.6 °C
36.6 °C36.9 °C35.1 °C
Maximum: 36.9 °C
Gemiddelde: 36 °C
Stroomadapter (max.)  37.6 °C | Kamertemperatuur 21.9 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 38.7 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 33 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.1 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 35.4 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 36.9 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 32.4 °C / 90 F, compared to the device average of 33 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2036.839.42539.941.63131.935.44038.937.25043.737.96329.829.98025.924.910026.325.912524.927.816021.636.3200194325018.949.131518.154.940016.658.950016.261.463014.963.38001564.2100015.672.6125014.974.5160014.973.3200015.675.7250014.671.7315014.269.5400014.164.2500014.465.8630014.669.9800014.970.31000015.269.21250015.463.61600015.750SPL6666.36470.627.583N18.319.715.825.3152.5median 15.4median 64.2Delta2.11042.946.342.343.934.834.63939.140.842.634.43528.127.125.125.123.627.822.137.120.244.919.650.218.456.418.960.520.163.62065.217.566.316.17515.576.217.874.3167315.971.416.172.316.363.416.564.816.572.116.970.916.663.91764.516.55567.866.429.383.620.818.51.255.5median 17median 64.51.710.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseXiaomi Mi Note 10 LiteXiaomi Mi Note 10
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 27% of all tested devices in this class were better, 13% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 53% of all tested devices were better, 9% similar, 38% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Xiaomi Mi Note 10 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 25% of all tested devices in this class were better, 13% similar, 62% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 52% of all tested devices were better, 9% similar, 39% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Stroomgebruik
Uit / Standbydarklight 0 / 0.2 Watt
Inactiefdarkmidlight 0.8 / 1.1 / 1.8 Watt
Belasting midlight 3.7 / 6.1 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
5260 mAh
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
4000 mAh
Oppo Reno2
4000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A51
4000 mAh
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
5260 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-24%
-7%
-23%
-28%
-2%
-19%
Idle Minimum *
0.8
0.65
19%
0.7
12%
0.9
-13%
0.7
12%
0.673 (0.49 - 0.8, n=4)
16%
0.89 (0.2 - 3.4, n=883)
-11%
Idle Average *
1.1
2.25
-105%
1.25
-14%
1.7
-55%
1.8
-64%
1.278 (0.96 - 1.8, n=4)
-16%
1.755 (0.6 - 6.2, n=882)
-60%
Idle Maximum *
1.8
2.29
-27%
1.36
24%
1.8
-0%
2.2
-22%
1.59 (1 - 2.2, n=4)
12%
2.04 (0.74 - 6.6, n=883)
-13%
Load Average *
3.7
3.7
-0%
5.38
-45%
5.2
-41%
5.2
-41%
4.35 (3.11 - 5.38, n=4)
-18%
4.1 (0.8 - 10.8, n=877)
-11%
Load Maximum *
6.1
6.46
-6%
6.71
-10%
6.6
-8%
7.5
-23%
6.39 (5.23 - 7.5, n=4)
-5%
6.07 (1.2 - 14.2, n=877)
-0%

* ... kleiner is beter

Batterijduur
Inactief (zonder WLAN, minimale helderheid)
37h 29min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
18h 15min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
22h 50min
Belast (maximale helderheid)
5h 37min
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
5260 mAh
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
4000 mAh
Oppo Reno2
4000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A51
4000 mAh
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
5260 mAh
Batterijduur
-4%
-24%
-28%
4%
Reader / Idle
2249
2533
13%
1689
-25%
2134
-5%
H.264
1370
1125
-18%
846
-38%
1423
4%
WiFi v1.3
1095
1047
-4%
616
-44%
698
-36%
1127
3%
Load
337
185
-45%
289
-14%
387
15%

Pro

+ hoogwaardige bouwkwaliteit
+ gebogen display
+ helder AMOLED-scherm
+ goede foto's bij daglicht
+ geen throttling
+ goede spelprestaties
+ zeer lange levensduur van de batterij
+ snel opladen

Contra

- gladde glazen behuizing
- middelmatige foto's bij weinig licht
- geen microSD-sleuf
- geen IP-certificering

Conclusie - Bovengemiddelde features voor een lage prijs

Getest: Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite: Testtoestel voorzien door
Getest: Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite: Testtoestel voorzien door

Dit is de verkorte versie van het originele artikel. Het volledige, Engelse testrapport vind je hier.

"Geweldige camera, kleine toegevingen", dit vat ons oordeel over de Xiaomi Mi Note 10 samen. Als we dit als referentie nemen, moet het oordeel over de Mi Note 10 Lite zijn: nog steeds een goede camera en geen extra compromissen in vergelijking met de Mi Note 10.

De Lite-versie biedt alles wat het high-end alternatief geweldig maakt: een uitstekende bouwkwaliteit, een helder AMOLED-scherm, extreem lange batterijduur, snel opladen, een snelle octa-core SoC en last but not least een zeer goede prijs-prestatieverhouding.

Voor een smartphone uit het middensegment is de Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite bovengemiddeld goed. Alleen de camera kan die van zijn high-end broer of zus Mi Note 10 niet helemaal evenaren.

Mi Note 10 Lite of Mi Note 10? Hoewel er geen twijfel over bestaat dat de 108 MP-camera van de Mi Note 10 iets betere foto's kan maken, is de kwaliteit van de foto's van de Mi Note 10 bijna net zo goed, althans in goed verlichte scenario's. De Lite-versie is echter aanzienlijk goedkoper, wat het naar onze mening een betere keuze maakt voor prijsbewuste kopers.

De Mi Note 10 Lite heeft niet veel nadelen. Omdat de interne opslag niet uitbreidbaar is met een microSD-kaart, moeten potentiële kopers zorgvuldig overwegen of ze het 64-GB- of het 128-GB-model kiezen. Verder is de Xiaomi smartphone niet waterdicht, is er geen sprake van draadloos opladen en voelt hij door zijn gladde oppervlak best glad aan.

Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite - 06-08-2020 v7
Manuel Masiero

Behuizing
86%
Toetsenbord
69 / 75 → 92%
Aanwijsapparaat
96%
Aansluitmogelijkheden
48 / 70 → 69%
Gewicht
88%
Batterij
92%
Beeldscherm
87%
Gaming-performance
28 / 64 → 44%
Applicatie-performance
68 / 86 → 79%
Temperatuur
89%
Luidheid
100%
Audio
76 / 90 → 84%
Camera
68%
Gemiddelde
77%
83%
Smartphone - Gewogen Gemiddelde

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Overzichten en testrapporten over laptops en mobieltjes > Testrapporten > Kort testrapport Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Smartphone: Prijs-prestaties-topper
Manuel Masiero, 2020-08-15 (Update: 2020-08-15)