Notebookcheck

Kort testrapport Apple iPhone SE 2020: kleine telefoon met een snelkloppend hart

Een geüpgradede klassieker. Met de tweede generatie van de iPhone SE heeft Apple de iPhone 8 visueel nagebouwd. Hoewel dit heeft geresulteerd in een - naar de huidige normen - relatief compacte smartphone met een paar high-end functies, is de verhouding tussen scherm en behuizing redelijk slecht. De lage basisprijs is anderzijds wel een groot pluspunt van de iPhone SE 2.
Daniel Schmidt, 👁 Daniel Schmidt, Stefanie Voigt,
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Processor
Apple A13 Bionic 6 x - 2.7 GHz, Lightning and Thunder
Grafische kaart
Apple A13 Bionic GPU
Geheugen
3072 MB 
Beeldscherm
4.7 inch 16:9, 1334 x 750 pixel 326 PPI, capacitief touchscreen, Retina HD, IPS, glimmend: ja, 60 Hz
Opslag
128 GB NVMe, 128 GB 
, 119.3 GB beschikbaar
Verbindingen
1 USB 2.0, Audio Verbindingen: Lightning, 1 Vingerafdruklezer, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensoren: Accelerometer, afstandssensor en 3-assen-gyroscoop, barometer, digitaal kompas, iBeacon micro-location, Lightning port
Netwerkmogelijkheden
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5.0, GSM/GPRS/Edge (850, 900, 1800 en 1900 MHz), UMTS/HSPA+ (850, 900, 1700/2100, 1900 en 2100 MHz), LTE (bands 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 11, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 46, 48 en 66), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Afmetingen
hoogte x breedte x diepte (in mm): 7.3 x 138.4 x 67.3
Batterij
6.96 Wh, 1822 mAh Lithium-Ion, 3.82 V
Charging
wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge
Besturingssysteem
Apple iOS 13
Camera
Primary Camera: 12 MPix (f/1.8, 5x digitale zoom, OIS, UHD-video)
Secondary Camera: 7 MPix (f/2.2, Full HD-video)
Bijkomende functionaliteiten
Luidsprekers: two speakers, Toetsenbord: onscreen, Oplader, Lightning-kabel, sticker, headset, documentatie, 12 Maanden Garantie, IP67, hoofd SAR: 0.98 W/kg, fanless, waterproof
Released
01-03-2020
Gewicht
148 g, Voeding: 45 g
Prijs
529 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Competing Devices

Evaluatie
Datum
Model
Gewicht
Drive
Formaat
Resolutie
Best Price
85 %
05-2020
Apple iPhone SE 2020
A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU
148 g128 GB NVMe4.7"1334x750
86 %
12-2019
Google Pixel 4
SD 855, Adreno 640
162 g64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash5.7"2280x1080
87 %
09-2019
Apple iPhone 11
A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU
194 g64 GB SSD6.1"1792x828
83 %
09-2017
Apple iPhone 8
A11 Bionic, A11 Bionic GPU
148 gApple 256 GB (iPhone 8 / Plus)4.7"1334x750
86 %
03-2020
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
SD 855, Adreno 640
186 g128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash6.7"2400x1080
84 %
01-2020
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro
SD 730G, Adreno 618
208 g256 GB UFS 2.0 Flash6.47"2340x1080

Formaat Vergelijking

162.5 mm 75.6 mm 8.1 mm 186 g157.8 mm 74.2 mm 9.7 mm 208 g150.9 mm 75.7 mm 8.3 mm 194 g147.1 mm 68.8 mm 8.2 mm 162 g138.4 mm 67.3 mm 7.3 mm 148 g138.4 mm 67.3 mm 7.3 mm 148 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Apple iPhone SE 2020
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 128 GB NVMe
618 (321min - 653max) MBit/s ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
612 (473min - 652max) MBit/s ∼99% -1%
Apple iPhone 11
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD
563 (490min - 597max) MBit/s ∼91% -9%
Google Pixel 4
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
526 (413min - 655max) MBit/s ∼85% -15%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro
Adreno 618, SD 730G, 256 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
329 (284min - 350max) MBit/s ∼53% -47%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 1414, n=590)
277 MBit/s ∼45% -55%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Apple iPhone SE 2020
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 128 GB NVMe
818 (400min - 892max) MBit/s ∼100%
Google Pixel 4
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
591 (564min - 609max) MBit/s ∼72% -28%
Apple iPhone 11
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD
529 (204min - 603max) MBit/s ∼65% -35%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
327 (155min - 377max) MBit/s ∼40% -60%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro
Adreno 618, SD 730G, 256 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
313 (306min - 319max) MBit/s ∼38% -62%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 1599, n=590)
263 MBit/s ∼32% -68%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700710720730740750760770780790800810820830840850860870880890900Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø608 (321-653)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø804 (400-892)
Apple iPhone SE (2020) - overzicht
Apple iPhone SE (2020) - overzicht
Apple iPhone SE (2020) - brug
Apple iPhone SE (2020) - brug
Apple iPhone SE (2020) - meer
Apple iPhone SE (2020) - meer
Garmin Edge 500 - overzicht
Garmin Edge 500 - overzicht
Garmin Edge 500 - brug
Garmin Edge 500 - brug
Garmin Edge 500 - meer
Garmin Edge 500 - meer

Beeldvergelijking

Bekijk een scène en navigeer binnen het eerste beeld. Eén klik wijzigt het zoomniveau. Eén klik op het ingezoomde beeld opent het origineel in een nieuw venster. Het eerste beeld toont de verschaalde foto van het testtoestel.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3Scene 4
klik om beelden te laden
ColorChecker
23.7 ∆E
40.1 ∆E
31 ∆E
27.4 ∆E
34.5 ∆E
48 ∆E
37.2 ∆E
25.4 ∆E
29.1 ∆E
23.9 ∆E
46.8 ∆E
47.4 ∆E
21.4 ∆E
33.6 ∆E
23.9 ∆E
45.2 ∆E
31.3 ∆E
32.7 ∆E
41.6 ∆E
43 ∆E
39.3 ∆E
30.8 ∆E
22.3 ∆E
13.3 ∆E
ColorChecker Apple iPhone SE 2020: 33.05 ∆E min: 13.35 - max: 48 ∆E
ColorChecker
19.8 ∆E
10.7 ∆E
14 ∆E
22.1 ∆E
11.3 ∆E
8 ∆E
8.3 ∆E
9.9 ∆E
11 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
10.9 ∆E
11.5 ∆E
11.6 ∆E
13.8 ∆E
10.2 ∆E
10.2 ∆E
8.7 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
3.2 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
9.5 ∆E
11.3 ∆E
7.4 ∆E
2.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Apple iPhone SE 2020: 10.45 ∆E min: 2.9 - max: 22.06 ∆E
630
cd/m²
672
cd/m²
677
cd/m²
647
cd/m²
688
cd/m²
676
cd/m²
633
cd/m²
636
cd/m²
675
cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling
Retina HD
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 688 cd/m² Gemiddelde: 659.3 cd/m² Minimum: 2.84 cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling: 92 %
Helderheid in Batterij-modus: 688 cd/m²
Contrast: 2457:1 (Zwart: 0.28 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.8
ΔE Greyscale 1.7 | 0.64-98 Ø6
99.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.25
Apple iPhone SE 2020
IPS, 1334x750, 4.7
Apple iPhone 8
IPS True Tone, 1334x750, 4.7
Apple iPhone 11
IPS, 1792x828, 6.1
Google Pixel 4
OLED, 2280x1080, 5.7
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Super AMOLED Plus, 2400x1080, 6.7
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.47
Screen
-18%
-19%
8%
-71%
-132%
Brightness middle
688
604
-12%
679
-1%
554
-19%
622
-10%
579
-16%
Brightness
659
580
-12%
671
2%
550
-17%
630
-4%
576
-13%
Brightness Distribution
92
91
-1%
93
1%
94
2%
96
4%
89
-3%
Black Level *
0.28
0.44
-57%
0.68
-143%
Contrast
2457
1373
-44%
999
-59%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
1
1.2
-20%
0.8
20%
0.8
20%
2.7
-170%
4.61
-361%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
2.2
2.3
-5%
2.4
-9%
1.4
36%
5.9
-168%
7.72
-251%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
1.7
1.6
6%
1.1
35%
1.3
24%
3
-76%
4.2
-147%
Gamma
2.25 98%
2.25 98%
2.24 98%
2.22 99%
2.09 105%
2.244 98%
CCT
6790 96%
6688 97%
6610 98%
6213 105%
6246 104%
7201 90%

* ... kleiner is beter

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Om de schermhelderheid te verlagen schakelen sommige laptops het backlight erg snel aan en uit. Dit gebeurt aan een dergelijk hoge frequentie dat het niet zichtbaar is voor het menselijk oog. Als de frequentie te laag is kunnen personen met gevoelige ogen geïrriteerd geraken, hoofdpijn krijgen en zelfs flickering waarnemen.
Screen flickering / PWM niet waargenomen

Ter vergelijking: 51 % van alle geteste toestellen maakten geen gebruik van PWM om de schermhelderheid te verlagen. Als het wel werd gebruikt, werd een gemiddelde van 17597 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 2500000) Hz waargenomen.

Responstijd Scherm

De responstijden van het scherm tonen hoe snel het scherm in staat is om van één kleur naar de andere te veranderen. Trage responstijden kunnen aanleiding geven tot 'nabeelden' rond bewegende objecten of het scherm wazig maken (blur). Vooral spelers van snelle 3D-games hebben baat bij een scherm met snelle responstijden.
       Responstijd Zwart naar Wit
21.2 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd↗ 6 ms stijging
↘ 15.2 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde prima responstijden in onze tests maar is misschien wat te traag voor competitieve games.
Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.8 (minimum) tot 240 (maximum) ms. » 28 % van alle toestellen zijn beter.
Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd beter is dan het gemiddelde (24.4 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.
       Responstijd 50% Grijs naar 80% Grijs
36.8 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd↗ 9.2 ms stijging
↘ 27.6 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde trage responstijden in onze tests en is misschien te traag voor games.
Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.8 (minimum) tot 636 (maximum) ms. » 34 % van alle toestellen zijn beter.
Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd vergelijkbaar is met het gemiddelde (38.8 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.
Geekbench 5.1 / 5.2
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sorteer op waarde)
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
3281 Points ∼93%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
2573 Points ∼73% -22%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
2722 Points ∼77% -17%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
3531 Points ∼100% +8%
Average Apple A13 Bionic
  (3281 - 3531, n=2)
3406 Points ∼96% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (421 - 3531, n=113)
1930 Points ∼55% -41%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sorteer op waarde)
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
1336 Points ∼100%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
746 Points ∼56% -44%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
740 Points ∼55% -45%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
1342 Points ∼100% 0%
Average Apple A13 Bionic
  (1336 - 1342, n=2)
1339 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (124 - 1342, n=113)
549 Points ∼41% -59%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
2898 Points ∼66%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4112 Points ∼93% +42%
Apple iPhone 8
Apple A11 Bionic, A11 Bionic GPU, 2048
1854 Points ∼42% -36%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
4418 Points ∼100% +52%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
3202 Points ∼72% +10%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
3018 Points ∼68% +4%
Average Apple A13 Bionic
  (2898 - 3219, n=3)
3045 Points ∼69% +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 5780, n=519)
2205 Points ∼50% -24%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
7847 Points ∼94%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
6383 Points ∼76% -19%
Apple iPhone 8
Apple A11 Bionic, A11 Bionic GPU, 2048
2783 Points ∼33% -65%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
7148 Points ∼85% -9%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
2492 Points ∼30% -68%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
8374 Points ∼100% +7%
Average Apple A13 Bionic
  (7847 - 8374, n=3)
8113 Points ∼97% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (75 - 9567, n=519)
2112 Points ∼25% -73%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sorteer op waarde)
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
5688 Points ∼91%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5685 Points ∼90% 0%
Apple iPhone 8
Apple A11 Bionic, A11 Bionic GPU, 2048
2505 Points ∼40% -56%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
6285 Points ∼100% +10%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
2567 Points ∼41% -55%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
6006 Points ∼96% +6%
Average Apple A13 Bionic
  (5688 - 6067, n=3)
5920 Points ∼94% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (93 - 8269, n=520)
1974 Points ∼31% -65%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
4052 Points ∼96%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4072 Points ∼97% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
4208 Points ∼100% +4%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
3155 Points ∼75% -22%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
3877 Points ∼92% -4%
Average Apple A13 Bionic
  (3411 - 4052, n=3)
3780 Points ∼90% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 5765, n=550)
2116 Points ∼50% -48%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
20135 Points ∼100%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9217 Points ∼46% -54%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
10410 Points ∼52% -48%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
3648 Points ∼18% -82%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
20154 Points ∼100% 0%
Average Apple A13 Bionic
  (17853 - 20154, n=3)
19381 Points ∼96% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (70 - 20154, n=550)
2833 Points ∼14% -86%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sorteer op waarde)
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
10699 Points ∼100%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7196 Points ∼67% -33%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
7842 Points ∼73% -27%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
3522 Points ∼33% -67%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
10427 Points ∼97% -3%
Average Apple A13 Bionic
  (9199 - 10699, n=3)
10108 Points ∼94% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (88 - 10699, n=550)
2382 Points ∼22% -78%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
2892 Points ∼67%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4199 Points ∼97% +45%
Apple iPhone 8
Apple A11 Bionic, A11 Bionic GPU, 2048
1989 Points ∼46% -31%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
4324 Points ∼100% +50%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
3202 Points ∼74% +11%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
3218 Points ∼74% +11%
Average Apple A13 Bionic
  (2429 - 4038, n=4)
3144 Points ∼73% +9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (435 - 5209, n=600)
2088 Points ∼48% -28%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
4573 Points ∼72%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
6214 Points ∼98% +36%
Apple iPhone 8
Apple A11 Bionic, A11 Bionic GPU, 2048
2581 Points ∼41% -44%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
6312 Points ∼100% +38%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
2245 Points ∼36% -51%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
5761 Points ∼91% +26%
Average Apple A13 Bionic
  (4573 - 6088, n=4)
5537 Points ∼88% +21%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53 - 8469, n=600)
1779 Points ∼28% -61%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sorteer op waarde)
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
4050 Points ∼71%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5615 Points ∼98% +39%
Apple iPhone 8
Apple A11 Bionic, A11 Bionic GPU, 2048
2421 Points ∼42% -40%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
5727 Points ∼100% +41%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
2405 Points ∼42% -41%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
4901 Points ∼86% +21%
Average Apple A13 Bionic
  (4050 - 5471, n=4)
4706 Points ∼82% +16%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 7400, n=601)
1699 Points ∼30% -58%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
2857 Points ∼63%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4540 Points ∼100% +59%
Apple iPhone 8
Apple A11 Bionic, A11 Bionic GPU, 2048
1774 Points ∼39% -38%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
4201 Points ∼93% +47%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
3228 Points ∼71% +13%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Average Apple A13 Bionic
  (2857 - 3839, n=2)
3348 Points ∼74% +17%
Average of class Smartphone
  (293 - 5274, n=642)
1954 Points ∼43% -32%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
9218 Points ∼90%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
8765 Points ∼85% -5%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
9670 Points ∼94% +5%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
3485 Points ∼34% -62%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Average Apple A13 Bionic
  (9218 - 11302, n=2)
10260 Points ∼100% +11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 12611, n=641)
2347 Points ∼23% -75%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sorteer op waarde)
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
6168 Points ∼82%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7263 Points ∼97% +18%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
7500 Points ∼100% +22%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
3424 Points ∼46% -44%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Average Apple A13 Bionic
  (6168 - 7893, n=2)
7031 Points ∼94% +14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 9549, n=644)
2019 Points ∼27% -67%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
33851 Points ∼84%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
37641 Points ∼94% +11%
Apple iPhone 8
Apple A11 Bionic, A11 Bionic GPU, 2048
24131 Points ∼60% -29%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
40137 Points ∼100% +19%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
33925 Points ∼85% 0%
Average Apple A13 Bionic
  (33851 - 33925, n=4)
33885 Points ∼84% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (735 - 58293, n=787)
15436 Points ∼38% -54%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sorteer op waarde)
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
209431 Points ∼100%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
102168 Points ∼49% -51%
Apple iPhone 8
Apple A11 Bionic, A11 Bionic GPU, 2048
112424 Points ∼54% -46%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
108114 Points ∼52% -48%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
208190 Points ∼99% -1%
Average Apple A13 Bionic
  (206190 - 209431, n=4)
208254 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (536 - 209431, n=785)
26683 Points ∼13% -87%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sorteer op waarde)
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
97290 Points ∼100%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
73984 Points ∼76% -24%
Apple iPhone 8
Apple A11 Bionic, A11 Bionic GPU, 2048
62006 Points ∼64% -36%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
78551 Points ∼81% -19%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
97216 Points ∼100% 0%
Average Apple A13 Bionic
  (96826 - 97290, n=4)
97152 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (662 - 112989, n=785)
20833 Points ∼21% -79%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sorteer op waarde)
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
250 fps ∼81%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
139 fps ∼45% -44%
Apple iPhone 8
Apple A11 Bionic, A11 Bionic GPU, 2048
161.3 fps ∼52% -35%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
166 fps ∼54% -34%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
309 fps ∼100% +24%
Average Apple A13 Bionic
  (250 - 322, n=4)
292 fps ∼94% +17%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.5 - 322, n=789)
45.1 fps ∼15% -82%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sorteer op waarde)
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
60 fps ∼50%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
88 fps ∼73% +47%
Apple iPhone 8
Apple A11 Bionic, A11 Bionic GPU, 2048
119.8 fps ∼100% +100%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
60 fps ∼50% 0%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
60 fps ∼50% 0%
Average Apple A13 Bionic
  (59 - 60, n=4)
59.8 fps ∼50% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 138, n=798)
31.1 fps ∼26% -48%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sorteer op waarde)
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
149 fps ∼89%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
75 fps ∼45% -50%
Apple iPhone 8
Apple A11 Bionic, A11 Bionic GPU, 2048
70.8 fps ∼42% -52%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
99 fps ∼59% -34%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
168 fps ∼100% +13%
Average Apple A13 Bionic
  (149 - 175, n=4)
162 fps ∼96% +9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.8 - 175, n=694)
26.6 fps ∼16% -82%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sorteer op waarde)
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
60 fps ∼52%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
67 fps ∼59% +12%
Apple iPhone 8
Apple A11 Bionic, A11 Bionic GPU, 2048
114.5 fps ∼100% +91%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
60 fps ∼52% 0%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
60 fps ∼52% 0%
Average Apple A13 Bionic
  (60 - 60, n=4)
60 fps ∼52% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 115, n=702)
22.4 fps ∼20% -63%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
93 fps ∼83%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
57 fps ∼51% -39%
Apple iPhone 8
Apple A11 Bionic, A11 Bionic GPU, 2048
54 fps ∼48% -42%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
69 fps ∼62% -26%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
112 fps ∼100% +20%
Average Apple A13 Bionic
  (93 - 117, n=4)
106 fps ∼95% +14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.87 - 117, n=557)
21.4 fps ∼19% -77%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
60 fps ∼55%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
51 fps ∼46% -15%
Apple iPhone 8
Apple A11 Bionic, A11 Bionic GPU, 2048
109.7 fps ∼100% +83%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
57 fps ∼52% -5%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
60 fps ∼55% 0%
Average Apple A13 Bionic
  (60 - 60, n=4)
60 fps ∼55% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 110, n=559)
19.4 fps ∼18% -68%
GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
60 fps ∼100%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
24 fps ∼40% -60%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
25 fps ∼42% -58%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
10 fps ∼17% -83%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
45 fps ∼75% -25%
Average Apple A13 Bionic
  (45 - 60, n=4)
52.8 fps ∼88% -12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.61 - 60, n=312)
11.2 fps ∼19% -81%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
31 fps ∼100%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
13 fps ∼42% -58%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
17 fps ∼55% -45%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
6.7 fps ∼22% -78%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
29 fps ∼94% -6%
Average Apple A13 Bionic
  (29 - 33, n=4)
30.5 fps ∼98% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.21 - 101, n=310)
8.02 fps ∼26% -74%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
60 fps ∼100%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
33 fps ∼55% -45%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
38 fps ∼63% -37%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
16 fps ∼27% -73%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
57 fps ∼95% -5%
Average Apple A13 Bionic
  (57 - 60, n=4)
58.8 fps ∼98% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 60, n=316)
16.8 fps ∼28% -72%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
72 fps ∼94%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
32 fps ∼42% -56%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
42 fps ∼55% -42%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
18 fps ∼23% -75%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
74 fps ∼96% +3%
Average Apple A13 Bionic
  (72 - 87, n=4)
77 fps ∼100% +7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 257, n=315)
19.3 fps ∼25% -73%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
59 fps ∼91%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
34 fps ∼53% -42%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
43 fps ∼67% -27%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
63 fps ∼98% +7%
Average Apple A13 Bionic
  (59 - 73, n=4)
64.5 fps ∼100% +9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 73, n=482)
14.4 fps ∼22% -76%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
60 fps ∼100%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
30 fps ∼50% -50%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
37 fps ∼62% -38%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
49 fps ∼82% -18%
Average Apple A13 Bionic
  (48 - 60, n=4)
54.3 fps ∼91% -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.1 - 60, n=486)
12.7 fps ∼21% -79%
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sorteer op waarde)
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
489463 Points ∼92%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
376698 Points ∼70% -23%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
451559 Points ∼84% -8%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
534558 Points ∼100% +9%
Average Apple A13 Bionic
  (489463 - 534558, n=2)
512011 Points ∼96% +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53335 - 607937, n=111)
317377 Points ∼59% -35%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sorteer op waarde)
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
1601 Points ∼92%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
1414 Points ∼81%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0%
Average Apple A13 Bionic
 
1745 Points ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7 - 1745, n=728)
820 Points ∼47%
Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9307 Points ∼55%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
8598 Points ∼51%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0%
Average Apple A13 Bionic
 
16996 Points ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone
  (18 - 16996, n=728)
2499 Points ∼15%
Memory (sorteer op waarde)
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
6458 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
5287 Points ∼82%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0%
Average Apple A13 Bionic
 
2350 Points ∼36%
Average of class Smartphone
  (21 - 8874, n=728)
1862 Points ∼29%
System (sorteer op waarde)
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
8058 Points ∼57%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
8515 Points ∼60%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0%
Average Apple A13 Bionic
 
14189 Points ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone
  (369 - 14189, n=728)
3458 Points ∼24%
Overall (sorteer op waarde)
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
Points ∼0%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5277 Points ∼94%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
4837 Points ∼86%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0%
Average Apple A13 Bionic
 
5607 Points ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 6273, n=728)
1763 Points ∼31%
Basemark GPU 1.2
Metal Medium Native (sorteer op waarde)
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
211.18 (93.41min - 435.35max) fps ∼100%
Average Apple A13 Bionic
 
211 fps ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (80.8 - 211, n=2)
146 fps ∼69% -31%
1920x1080 Metal Medium Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
136.56 (72.64min - 258.13max) fps ∼100%
Average Apple A13 Bionic
 
137 fps ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (113 - 137, n=2)
125 fps ∼91% -8%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone SE 2020 (Safari Mobile 13.1)
139.668 Points ∼100%
Average Apple A13 Bionic (129 - 140, n=4)
133 Points ∼95% -5%
Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0)
132.886 Points ∼95% -5%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite (Chrome 80)
63.778 Points ∼46% -54%
Google Pixel 4 (Chrome 78)
56.678 Points ∼41% -59%
Average of class Smartphone (9.13 - 140, n=188)
40.6 Points ∼29% -71%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0)
293.36 Points ∼100% +5%
Average Apple A13 Bionic (279 - 302, n=4)
293 Points ∼100% +5%
Apple iPhone SE 2020 (Safari Mobile 13.1)
278.62 Points ∼95%
Apple iPhone 8
206.7 Points ∼70% -26%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite (Chrome 80)
112.3 Points ∼38% -60%
Google Pixel 4 (Chrome 78)
107.51 Points ∼37% -61%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 302, n=619)
47.1 Points ∼16% -83%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Apple iPhone SE 2020 (Safari Mobile 13.1)
158 runs/min ∼100%
Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0)
157 runs/min ∼99% -1%
Average Apple A13 Bionic (153 - 158, n=4)
155 runs/min ∼98% -2%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite (Chrome 80)
62.2 runs/min ∼39% -61%
Google Pixel 4 (Chrome 78)
61.8 runs/min ∼39% -61%
Average of class Smartphone (6.42 - 158, n=171)
42.7 runs/min ∼27% -73%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0)
184 Points ∼100% +26%
Average Apple A13 Bionic (146 - 184, n=4)
174 Points ∼95% +19%
Apple iPhone SE 2020 (Safari Mobile 13.1)
146 Points ∼79%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite (Chrome 80)
95 Points ∼52% -35%
Google Pixel 4 (Chrome 78)
94 Points ∼51% -36%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 184, n=255)
69.7 Points ∼38% -52%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average Apple A13 Bionic (48819 - 49388, n=4)
49087 Points ∼100% 0%
Apple iPhone SE 2020 (Safari Mobile 13.1)
48991 Points ∼100%
Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0)
48819 Points ∼99% 0%
Apple iPhone 8
34163 Points ∼70% -30%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite (Chrome 80)
22942 Points ∼47% -53%
Google Pixel 4 (Chrome 78)
22572 Points ∼46% -54%
Average of class Smartphone (894 - 49388, n=786)
7859 Points ∼16% -84%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (1914 - 59466, n=812)
9766 ms * ∼100% -1676%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite (Chrome 80)
2138.6 ms * ∼22% -289%
Google Pixel 4 (Chrome 78)
2072.2 ms * ∼21% -277%
Apple iPhone 8
730.8 ms * ∼7% -33%
Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0)
572.8 ms * ∼6% -4%
Average Apple A13 Bionic (550 - 573, n=4)
566 ms * ∼6% -3%
Apple iPhone SE 2020 (Safari Mobile 13.1)
549.9 ms * ∼6%

* ... kleiner is beter

0102030405060Tooltip
; PUBG Mobile; 0.18.0: Ø59.5 (58-60)
; Battle Bay; 4.8.22668: Ø59.5 (57-60)
Max. Belasting
 40.5 °C40.5 °C36.8 °C 
 39 °C38.6 °C36.5 °C 
 36.8 °C37.2 °C36.5 °C 
Maximum: 40.5 °C
Gemiddelde: 38 °C
37.7 °C40.2 °C41.4 °C
36.8 °C37.7 °C41.3 °C
36.3 °C38.5 °C39.2 °C
Maximum: 41.4 °C
Gemiddelde: 38.8 °C
Stroomadapter (max.)  31 °C | Kamertemperatuur 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 38 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 33 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.5 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 35.4 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41.4 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 32 °C / 90 F, compared to the device average of 33 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2032.827.42526.227.43123.322.94021.925502825.86319.924.48019.125.510019.928.612516.53916019.64920017.549.325017.54831513.951.540013.952.850015.858.863015.260.78001466.310001468.6125013.972160013.473.9200013.874.6250014.375.931501477.1400014.576.9500014.677.9630014.576800014.772.61000015.166.5125001558.31600014.847.1SPL26.586.4N0.862.5median 14.6median 66.3Delta112.631.639.125.437.625.336.932.940.833.635.231.633.328.433.82733.520.842.82250.821.351.520.849.821.253.919.45619.558.717.761.617.962.917.866.217.368.217.468.416.768.517.267.318.26817.969.817.668.817.767.517.861.717.959.118.160.618.256.23078.41.343.6median 17.9median 61.61.37.5hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseApple iPhone SE 2020Apple iPhone 8
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Apple iPhone SE 2020 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.3% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.4% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 36% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 51% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 60% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 32% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Apple iPhone 8 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 21% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 73% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Stroomgebruik
Uit / Standbydarklight 0.01 / 0.1 Watt
Inactiefdarkmidlight 0.44 / 1.56 / 1.63 Watt
Belasting midlight 2.32 / 4.12 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Apple iPhone SE 2020
1822 mAh
Google Pixel 4
2800 mAh
Apple iPhone 11
3110 mAh
Apple iPhone 8
1821 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
4500 mAh
Average Apple A13 Bionic
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-70%
-63%
-27%
-42%
-42%
-53%
Idle Minimum *
0.44
1.01
-130%
0.56
-27%
0.54
-23%
0.58
-32%
0.625 (0.44 - 0.92, n=4)
-42%
0.89 (0.2 - 3.4, n=885)
-102%
Idle Average *
1.56
1.63
-4%
2.99
-92%
1.63
-4%
1.55
1%
2.36 (1.56 - 2.99, n=4)
-51%
1.755 (0.6 - 6.2, n=884)
-13%
Idle Maximum *
1.63
1.69
-4%
3.02
-85%
1.67
-2%
1.64
-1%
2.41 (1.63 - 3.02, n=4)
-48%
2.04 (0.74 - 6.6, n=885)
-25%
Load Average *
2.32
4.67
-101%
4.17
-80%
2.74
-18%
4.29
-85%
3.32 (2.32 - 4.17, n=4)
-43%
4.1 (0.8 - 10.8, n=879)
-77%
Load Maximum *
4.12
8.78
-113%
5.44
-32%
7.78
-89%
8.03
-95%
5.29 (4.12 - 6.18, n=4)
-28%
6.08 (1.2 - 14.2, n=879)
-48%

* ... kleiner is beter

Batterijduur
Inactief (zonder WLAN, minimale helderheid)
32h 18min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3 (Safari Mobile 13.1)
11h 34min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
11h 21min
Belast (maximale helderheid)
2h 23min
Apple iPhone SE 2020
1822 mAh
Google Pixel 4
2800 mAh
Apple iPhone 11
3110 mAh
Apple iPhone 8
1821 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
4500 mAh
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro
5260 mAh
Batterijduur
-16%
56%
3%
44%
60%
Reader / Idle
1938
1007
-48%
2765
43%
1629
-16%
2504
29%
H.264
681
617
-9%
1147
68%
698
2%
1183
74%
WiFi v1.3
694
460
-34%
866
25%
585
-16%
823
19%
1112
60%
Load
143
185
29%
267
87%
202
41%
222
55%

Pro

+ helder scherm met accurate kleuren
+ snelle SoC
+ ondersteunt Wi-Fi 6 en een breed scala aan LTE-frequenties
+ IP67-certificering
+ draadloos opladen
+ lichtgewicht en slank
+ goede lokalisatiemogelijkheden

Contra

- zwakke stroomadapter
- niet-uitbreidbare opslag
- slechte verhouding tussen scherm en behuizing
- slechts een enkele camera
- matige gesprekskwaliteit
- slechts 12 maanden garantie

Conclusie - De iPhone 8 refresh is een succes, maar niet voor iedereen

Getest: Apple iPhone SE (2020)
Getest: Apple iPhone SE (2020)

Dit is de verkorte versie van het originele artikel. Het volledige, Engelse testrapport vind je hier.

Met de iPhone SE heeft Apple een aantrekkelijke smartphone uitgebracht die uitpakt met een snelle processor, een geweldig scherm, snelle WiFi en een lange update-periode. Bovendien is het toestel waterdicht en compatibel met draadloos opladen.

De iPhone SE (2020) is momenteel het goedkoopste ticket naar het Apple-universum.

De grootste zwakke punten zijn de slechte verhouding tussen scherm en behuizing en het kleinere scherm. Wie van een iPhone 6, 7, 8 of de SE van de eerste generatie komt, zal dit laatste waarschijnlijk niet echt een probleem vinden. Dit is precies de doelgroep van de iPhone SE2. Daarentegen zullen Android-gebruikers waarschijnlijk niet worden beïnvloed door de bovengenoemde nadelen en de weinige mogelijkheden op het gebied van de camera. Voor deze groep is de iPhone 11 waarschijnlijk een aantrekkelijkere optie.

De iPhone SE (2020) is een zeer evenwichtig stukje technologie. Ondertussen is de Google Pixel 4 de enige echte optie voor potentiële kopers die op zoek zijn naar een op Android gebaseerd equivalent. De Pixel biedt een betere scherm-tot-behuizing-verhouding, een 90-Hz paneel, een opstelling met twee camera's en slechtere batterijduur voor een identiek prijspunt.

Apple iPhone SE 2020 - 15-05-2020 v7
Daniel Schmidt

Behuizing
82%
Toetsenbord
68 / 75 → 91%
Aanwijsapparaat
89%
Aansluitmogelijkheden
51 / 70 → 72%
Gewicht
93%
Batterij
89%
Beeldscherm
90%
Gaming-performance
60 / 64 → 94%
Applicatie-performance
83 / 86 → 97%
Temperatuur
88%
Luidheid
100%
Audio
71 / 90 → 79%
Camera
63%
Gemiddelde
79%
85%
Smartphone - Gewogen Gemiddelde

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Overzichten en testrapporten over laptops en mobieltjes > Testrapporten > Kort testrapport Apple iPhone SE 2020: kleine telefoon met een snelkloppend hart
Daniel Schmidt, 2020-05-21 (Update: 2020-05-21)