Samsung Galaxy S22+
Laptopspecificaties

Secundaire Camera: 10 MPix f/2.2, FOV 80°
Price comparison
Gemiddelde van 41 score (van 61 beoordelingen)
Testrapporten voor de Samsung Galaxy S22+
De plus (+) in de productnaam suggereert extra functies, en de Samsung Galaxy S22+ levert zoals besteld. Hij biedt alle functies die de befaamde Galaxy S22 onderscheiden, maar gaat nog een stap verder, vooral op het gebied van beeldscherm en batterij.
Bron: Computer Totaal

De Samsung Galaxy S22+ is een geweldige smartphone waar je jarenlang van kunt genieten. Vooral de camera, beeldkwaliteit en update-ondersteuning vallen positief op. Toch heeft de smartphone wat moeite om zich te onderscheiden van zijn voorganger. Ook is de keuze voor een kleinere accu niet te verklaren.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 16-05-2022
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80%
Bron: AndroidWorld.nl

De Samsung Galaxy S22 Plus is een onwijs goede smartphone met een mooie en luxe design waar je verliefd op kunt worden, een prachtig beeldscherm, goede prestaties, uitstekende en vooral consistent presterende camera's en biedt ook nog eens vier grote Android-upgrades en vijf jaar aan beveiligingsupdates. Er zijn smartphones op de markt die een betere camera hebben of (nog) sneller zijn, maar die laten op andere punten weer vaak iets liggen. De Samsung Galaxy S22 Plus laat echter op geen enkel punt echt steken vallen, en hiermee is de Samsung Galaxy S22 Plus als totaalplaatje gewoonweg heel erg goed. Misschien dat enkel de prijs de telefoon nu nog een beetje in de weg zit, met (minimaal) 1049 euro is deze namelijk niet goedkoop. Maar ja, liefde mag natuurlijk wel wat kosten. Al vind ik het gat van 200 euro met de 'normale' Galaxy S22 dit jaar wel erg groot. Voor 849 euro krijg je immers op bijna alle fronten dezelfde smartphone, zij het dat alleen het scherm iets minder groot en fel is én de accu minder groot.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 10-03-2022
Anderstalige testrapporten
Bron: DxOMark
EN→NLWe put the Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Exynos) through our rigorous DXOMARK Battery test suite to measure its performance in autonomy, charging and efficiency. In these test results, we will break down how it fared in a variety of tests and several common use cases.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 24-03-2022
Bron: DxOMark
EN→NLThe DXOMARK Audio overall score of 72 for the Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Exynos) is derived from its Playback and Recording scores and their respective sub-scores. While the overall score of the Galaxy S22+ (Exynos) is a point higher than the S22 Ultra (Exynos), and the S22 (Exynos), the performance of the S22+ gained some points in the recording subscore over the Ultra, particularly in timbre, mainly because of a better performance when recording loud environments such as an electronic concert. n playback, the S22+ (Exynos) matched the performance of the S22 Ultra (Exynos) in timbre, spatial and volume, mainly because of the Ultra’s better wideness performance and low-end extension. The S22+ (Exynos) also gained a couple of points over the Ultra version in artifacts. Since the devices have the same audio specifications and most of the scores are so close and within our margin of error, we direct you to the S22 Ultra (Exynos) Audio test results for the full details on the audio performance of the Galaxy S22+ (Exynos).
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 18-03-2022
Bron: Expert Reviews
EN→NLAll that said, despite its positives, the Galaxy S22 Plus is in danger of falling out of the limelight. With the S22 Ultra catching admiring glances and the regular S22 shaping up to be a great-value option, the Plus is a bit of an oddity. Sitting slap bang in the middle of the range in terms of price, it’s a decent option, but it doesn’t really stand apart from the rest, either. The bigger screen is a nice bonus, as is the chunkier battery, but sadly I can’t see many of these flying off the shelves. After all, if you’re already prepared to pay flagship-sized sums on a new phone, you’d be better off spending the extra cash and picking up the S22 Ultra instead. On the flip side, if money is a bit tight, the regular S22 ought to be your go-to upgrade. In closing, the S22 Plus is no doubt a lovely handset, but it continues to be a bit of an enigma. Samsung should be doing more to separate the middle child from the rest of the family next year, or perhaps even consider scrapping it altogether.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 17-03-2022
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80%
Bron: Tech Advisor
EN→NLWhen it comes to building flagship phones, some things come effortlessly to Samsung: killer displays, elegant design paired with superb build quality, and intuitive, feature-packed software. As such, you know you're not going to be let down when you pick up a Galaxy S phone. As highlighted by the likes of the ill-fated Galaxy Note 7 and, to a lesser extent, the camera system on the Galaxy S20 Ultra, the South Korean company doesn't always get things quite right, however, and the S22+ undoubtedly has its cracks. Battery life is fine, but it lags behind the competition, while the promise of improved fast charging fails to deliver any meaningful benefit to users. The new camera system clearly has potential too, but imaging issues already addressed on last year's S series seem to have inexplicably re-emerged on the S22+, highlighting problem areas that users shouldn't have to deal with on a device at this price point.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 11-03-2022
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80%
Bron: DxOMark
EN→NLWith a DXOMARK Camera score of 126 the Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Exynos) camera does an excellent job, but it lands in the middle of the Ultra-Premium segment that it is in. Compared to last year’s S21+, the new device offers significant improvements in most areas. The results of the S22+ (Exynos) were identical to those of the S22 (Exynos), and we direct you to the Galaxy S22 (Exynos) Camera test for a more in-depth look into the device’s camera performance.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer kort, Datum: 11-03-2022
Bron: Tech Advisor
EN→NLWhen it comes to building flagship phones, some things come effortlessly to Samsung: killer displays, elegant design paired with superb build quality, and intuitive, feature-packed software. As such, you know you're not going to be let down when you pick up a Galaxy S phone. As highlighted by the likes of the ill-fated Galaxy Note 7 and, to a lesser extent, the camera system on the Galaxy S20 Ultra, the South Korean company doesn't always get things quite right, however, and the S22+ undoubtedly has its cracks. Battery life is fine, but it lags behind the competition, while the promise of improved fast charging fails to deliver any meaningful benefit to users. The new camera system clearly has potential too, but imaging issues already addressed on last year's S series seem to have inexplicably re-emerged on the S22+, highlighting problem areas that users shouldn't have to deal with on a device at this price point.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 25-02-2022
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80%
Bron: Trusted Reviews
EN→NLThe Galaxy S22 Plus seems like a very promising flagship phone, given its attractive design, promising cameras, and the very latest silicon chips onboard. We’re going to need more time with the phone to give you our final verdict, but from what we’ve seen so far the device seems to have the ability to pick up from where the Galaxy S21 Plus started off.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 09-02-2022
Bron: Pocket Lint
EN→NLOut of the three Galaxy S22 models to arrive, we feel the S22+ fits into that sweet spot the best out of the lot. It's slightly smaller than the S21+ from before, adding refinement to the familiar design. That it's got a flat screen, not a curved one like the S22 Ultra, and doesn't dabble in S Pen stylus integration - a feature that we're not convinced all S series users will want anyway (that's what the Note was for) - seems all the more contemporary for a 2022 arrival. And while the Plus' cameras are identical to the smaller S22's setup, the added battery life of the bigger model will bring that little more assurance. All in all, then, while the generation to generation updates are unremarkable, the Samsung Galaxy S22+ might well be pick of the 2022 bunch - and an example of a top drawer Android flagship where refinement rather than reinvention can go a long way.
Hands-On, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 09-02-2022
Bron: Expert Reviews
EN→NLThe Galaxy S22 Plus is in danger of falling out of the limelight. With the S22 Ultra catching admiring glances and the regular S22 shaping up to be a great-value option, the S22 Plus is a bit of an oddity. Sitting slap bang in the middle in terms of price, it doesn’t really stand apart, either, and it might be difficult to earn a recommendation when it eventually arrives on my desk for review. In the meantime, however, I’m going to try my best to remain cautiously optimistic. If there’s a big boost to battery life, then it could well be worth it for that alone. The Galaxy S22 Plus is available to preorder from today, with a release date scheduled for 11 March. Prices start at £949 for the 128GB model, with the 256GB variant costing £999.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 09-02-2022
Bron: Stuff Magazine
EN→NLThe S22 and S22 Plus should be reliably good phones with premium design, great screens and nippy internals. Time will tell just how good their new camera system is, and whether the phones can hold their own against the 108MP behemoth – the S22 Ultra, or other champs like the iPhone 13 Pro and Pixel 6. Early impressions are unabashedly positive for all three of Samsung’s S22 smartphones, with the S22 in particular set to be the slim phone lover’s choice weighing just 168g and measuring 7.6mm thin. Meanwhile, the S22 Plus is a OnePlus 9 Pro competitor, with its larger screen and sub-£1,000 price, while the Ultra, which you can read about in our S22 Ultra hands-on, delivers S Pen input, even bigger visuals, and a top-tier camera system.
Hands-On, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 09-02-2022
Bron: Netzwelt
DE→NLEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 05-11-2022
Beoordeling: Totale score: 70% functionaliteiten: 70% mobiliteit: 60% afwerking: 80%
Bron: Computerbild
DE→NLEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 17-10-2022
Beoordeling: Totale score: 96%
Bron: Connect - 6/22

Vergelijking, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 01-06-2022
Beoordeling: Totale score: 87%
Bron: Nextpit Germany
DE→NLEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 19-05-2022
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80%
Bron: Computerbild
DE→NLEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 09-05-2022
Beoordeling: Totale score: 96%
Bron: Curved
DE→NLEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 01-04-2022
Beoordeling: Totale score: 87% prijs: 65% prestatie: 84% beeldscherm: 92% mobiliteit: 85%
Bron: Tech Stage
DE→NLEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 25-03-2022
Beoordeling: Totale score: 90%
Bron: Teltarif
DE→NLEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 21-03-2022
Beoordeling: Totale score: 90% prijs: 67% prestatie: 60% beeldscherm: 80% mobiliteit: 90% afwerking: 100%
Bron: Inside Handy
DE→NLEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 11-03-2022
Bron: A1 Blog
DE→NLVergelijking, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 02-03-2022
Bron: Tuexperto
ES→NLEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 06-03-2022
Bron: El Español
ES→NLEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 03-03-2022
Bron: Computerhoy
ES→NLEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 25-02-2022
Beoordeling: Totale score: 90% functionaliteiten: 80% beeldscherm: 100% mobiliteit: 90% afwerking: 90%
Bron: Xataka
ES→NLEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 22-02-2022
Beoordeling: Totale score: 91% prestatie: 93% beeldscherm: 90% mobiliteit: 88% afwerking: 95%
Bron: Showmetech.com.br
PT→NLEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 04-06-2022
Beoordeling: Totale score: 90% prestatie: 100% beeldscherm: 80% mobiliteit: 70% afwerking: 100%
Bron: Tudo Celular
PT→NLEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 22-04-2022
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80% prijs: 80%
Bron: AndroidWorld.it
IT→NLVergelijking, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 09-04-2022
Beoordeling: Totale score: 84% prijs: 60% functionaliteiten: 85% beeldscherm: 95% mobiliteit: 65% afwerking: 95% ergonomie: 95%
Bron: HDblog.it
IT→NLEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 23-02-2022
Beoordeling: Totale score: 82% prijs: 53% functionaliteiten: 72%
Bron: Tutto Android
IT→NLEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 23-02-2022
Beoordeling: Totale score: 85% prestatie: 85% mobiliteit: 75% afwerking: 85%
Bron: Andrea Galeazzi
IT→NLEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 21-02-2022
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80% prijs: 65% mobiliteit: 75% afwerking: 83%
Bron: Journal du Geek
FR→NLVergelijking, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 29-09-2022
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80%
Bron: Charles Tech
FR→NLEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 29-06-2022
Beoordeling: Totale score: 82% prestatie: 80% beeldscherm: 90% mobiliteit: 70%
Bron: Journal du Geek
FR→NLVergelijking, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 24-05-2022
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80%
Bron: Nextpit France
FR→NLEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 16-05-2022
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80%
Bron: Phonandroid
FR→NLEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 13-04-2022
Beoordeling: Totale score: 70%
Bron: Journal du Geek
FR→NLVergelijking, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 06-04-2022
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80%
Bron: L' Eclaireur FNAC
FR→NLEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 01-04-2022
Beoordeling: Totale score: 100% prestatie: 100% beeldscherm: 60% mobiliteit: 70%
Bron: CNet France
FR→NLEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 14-03-2022
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80%
Bron: Les Mobiles
FR→NLEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 11-03-2022
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80%
Bron: Clubic
FR→NLEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 01-03-2022
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80% prestatie: 80% beeldscherm: 100% mobiliteit: 80% afwerking: 80%
Bron: Geeks and Com
FR→NLEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 28-02-2022
Beoordeling: Totale score: 85% prestatie: 95% beeldscherm: 85% mobiliteit: 85% afwerking: 100%
Bron: Journal du Geek
FR→NLEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 27-02-2022
Bron: Presse Citron
FR→NLEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 27-02-2022
Beoordeling: Totale score: 73% prijs: 70% prestatie: 70% beeldscherm: 95% mobiliteit: 40% afwerking: 95%
Bron: L' Eclaireur FNAC
FR→NLEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 26-02-2022
Beoordeling: prestatie: 100% beeldscherm: 60% mobiliteit: 70%
Bron: Les Numeriques
FR→NLEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 23-02-2022
Beoordeling: Totale score: 100% prestatie: 60% beeldscherm: 100% mobiliteit: 80% afwerking: 100% ergonomie: 100%
Bron: CNet France
FR→NLEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 21-02-2022
Bron: Nextpit France
FR→NLEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 09-02-2022
Bron: Tabletowo
PL→NLEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 05-03-2022
Beoordeling: Totale score: 90%
Bron: Android.com.pl
PL→NLEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 26-02-2022
Beoordeling: Totale score: 85% prestatie: 90% beeldscherm: 100% mobiliteit: 70% afwerking: 90%
Bron: Chip Online TR
TR→NLEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 17-03-2022
Beoordeling: Totale score: 85%
Bron: Ferra.ru
RU→NLHands-On, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 09-02-2022
Bron: MobilArena HU
HU→NLVergelijking, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 07-03-2022
Beoordeling: prijs: 60% beeldscherm: 90% mobiliteit: 70% afwerking: 90%
Bron: Smartmania.cz
CZ→NLEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 30-03-2022
Beoordeling: Totale score: 92% prestatie: 94% functionaliteiten: 91% mobiliteit: 88% afwerking: 94%
Bron: Mobility.bg
BU→NLEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 25-02-2022
Bron: Tek.no
NO→NLEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 23-02-2022
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80%
Bron: Alt om Data
DA→NLEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 07-03-2022
Beoordeling: Totale score: 100% prijs: 83% prestatie: 100%
Bron: Lyd og Billede
DA→NLEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 25-02-2022
Bron: Mobil.se
SV→NLEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 07-03-2022
Beoordeling: Totale score: 84%
Bron: Computerblog.ro
→NLEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 30-05-2022
Commentaar
Samsung Xclipse 920:
Grafische chip voor smartphones en tablets die geïntegreerd is in de Samsung Exynos 2200 SoC. Gebaseerd op de AMD RDNA 2 architectuur met 3 CU's (=192 shaders). Gefabriceerd in het moderne 4nm-proces (EUV).
Deze grafische kaarten zouden alle huidige spellen moeten kunnen draaien, maar de meeste spellen zullen alleen met gemiddelde of lage detail instellingen en lage resoluties goed werken. Oudere of minder veeleisende spellen kunnen nog wel met goede grafische instellingen gespeeld worden.
>> Meer informatie kan gevonden worden in ons Vergelijk van Mobiele Grafische Kaarten en de passende Benchmark Tabel.
Exynos 2200:
High End SoC met 8 kernen in drie clusters (1x Exynos X2 2,8 GHz/ 3x Cortex-A710 2,52 GHz/ 4x A510 1,82 GHz). Hij integreert ook een snelle 5G-modem met tot 7,35 Gbps en is vervaardigd in 4nm bij Samsung.
>> Meer informatie kan gevonden worden in ons Vergelijk van Mobiele Processors.
