Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
Laptopspecificaties

Secundaire Camera: 12 MPix (f/2.2, FF, Videos @1080p/30fps)
Price comparison
Gemiddelde van 37 score (van 75 beoordelingen)
Testrapporten voor de Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
Als u op zoek bent naar een betaalbare mid-range telefoon in 2025, dan kunt u moeilijk om de Galaxy A36 heen. Tenminste wat betreft de focus op ondersteuning voor updates op de lange termijn. Maar dual eSIM en een waterbestendige behuizing zijn ook unieke verkooppunten in deze prijsklasse. Heeft Samsung de beste smartphone voor minder dan $400 gemaakt?
Bron: Diskidee.nl

De Samsung Galaxy A36 is een degelijke middenklasser, maar worstelt met bekende problemen. De processor laat het soms afweten, de software reageert traag en de video's overtuigen niet. Het is allemaal te verwachten op dit prijspunt, al blijft het jammer. Zeker omdat concurrenten als Motorola, OnePlus, Oppo en Xiaomi dit beter voor elkaar hebben, terwijl Samsung juist meer middelen heeft. Ook de stap van de A35 naar de A36 is zo klein dat overstappen nauwelijks zin heeft. Is er dan niets positiefs te melden? Zeker wel. Het beeldscherm is even mooi als altijd en voor foto's op sociale media voldoet de camera prima. Dankzij het IP67-certificaat is de telefoon bovendien water- en stofdicht. Ook de uitgebreide softwaresupport en de lange batterijduur spreken in het voordeel van de Galaxy A36. Toch blijft de vraag of dit de beste keuze is tussen de 300 en 400 euro. Voorlopig neigen we nog naar nee, omdat de matige prestaties te veel in de weg zitten. Daarin valt het toestel echt het meeste tegen.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 05-05-2025
Beoordeling: Totale score: 65%
Bron: AndroidWorld.nl

Een wijze levensles: het gaat niet altijd om uiterlijk vertoon, maar om echte kwaliteit. Een les die goed zou passen bij de Samsung Galaxy A36. Een telefoon die zeker niet de mooiste op de markt is en bovendien over weinig uitmuntende dingen beschikt. Met andere woorden: de smartphone blinkt nergens echt in uit, los van het updatebeleid dan. Het scherm is goed, maar niet bijzonder. Het toestel kan sneller worden opgeladen, maar nog altijd niet zo snel als veel concurrenten. De accuduur is prima, maar zeker niet het beste op de markt. En de camera’s scoren dan wel een ruime voldoende, er zijn echter ook telefoons in deze prijsklasse te vinden die op dit punt nog beter scoren. Daarnaast zijn de prestaties van de A36 niet geweldig en mist het toestel zijn vertrouwden MicroSD-kaart slot.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 25-04-2025
Beoordeling: Totale score: 75%
Anderstalige testrapporten
Bron: Tech Advisor

The Samsung Galaxy A36 5G is another solid, affordable mid-ranger that won’t let you down. However, it also won’t excite you in any way. There’s a new breed of mid-range phones that dare to try something different, whether it’s the Nothing Phone (3a) Pro’s telephoto camera and memory-aid button, or the Motorola Edge 60’s unusually robust design and super-bright screen.When taken in this context, the Samsung Galaxy A36 can’t help but feel a little safe and drab. What it does supply is a decent screen, a good camera, solid stamina, and exemplary software support. Whether that’s enough to set your pulse racing is another matter. You have to feel that Samsung should be doing more in performance and design terms.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 05-06-2025
Beoordeling: Totale score: 78%
Bron: Mobile Syrup

The Galaxy A36 shows how Samsung has a full-service portfolio in Canada. The handset isn’t for me, I’m a flagship guy, but if you’re not interested in the bells and whistles, this might be for you. My little brother uses his phone to listen to music, make calls and text his friends. This is all he would need. Similarly, my dad doesn’t use his phone often, and I would have no problem recommending this to him either.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer kort, Datum: 29-05-2025
Bron: Gadgetbyte Nepal

So, wrapping up this review, I’d say the Samsung Galaxy A36 is a decent phone with some nice features. But at this price point, it doesn’t really blow me away. If you’re dead set on buying a Samsung phone and don’t want to cross the 50K mark, then sure, go for the A36. But if you’re fine with a non-Samsung phone, then there are better phones in this price range. Like the Nothing Phone (3a) (review), Honor 200 (review), or the CMF Phone 2 Pro (review). In short, the A36 is like ordering a fancy meal that tastes okay but leaves you thinking, “Maybe I should’ve just spent a bit more for the steak.”
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 27-05-2025
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80% prijs: 75% prestatie: 70% beeldscherm: 85% mobiliteit: 85% afwerking: 85%
Bron: Nextpit EN

The Galaxy A5X has been one of the best-selling smartphones across the world for years, while cheaper models often receive less attention. This year, the A56 once again proved to be a solid choice in the mid-range in our review. Neither performance, battery, nor camera stood out, but there are no serious weaknesses with it either. In combination with Samsung's excellent update policy, the device retains a clear "Buy" recommendation. However, the Samsung Galaxy A36 has caught up and is almost as good as its big brother. For $100 less, Samsung has made cuts in the right places without compromising its suitability for everyday use. The plastic frame is hardly noticeable in everyday use, especially with a protective cover. The ultra wide-angle camera lags behind that of the A56, but even the more expensive model does not offer outstanding quality in this department.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 20-05-2025
Beoordeling: Totale score: 70%
Bron: Calcalistech

The Galaxy A36 invites the classic question: is the glass half empty or half full? At first glance, its lack of AI features might make it seem like a second-tier device in Samsung’s lineup. However, the A36 has some strong points: solid protection, support for eSIM (still rare at this price level), an excellent display, and overall, it performs its intended role well. That said, it faces stiff competition. At the same price point, other devices offer better water and dust resistance, more storage, faster charging, or more RAM. There are also cheaper phones that match the A36’s feature set. It's unclear whether Samsung's brand name alone will be enough to convince consumers to opt for this more affordable model.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 12-05-2025
Bron: PC Mag

The Samsung Galaxy A36 is a solid update to the A35 with a brighter display, smoother performance, and extended update promises. It also takes cleaner photos and adds a dash of AI. It’s a strong choice if you want a reliable Android phone for under $400. If you're willing to increase your budget by $100, the Pixel 9a offers even better camera quality and advanced AI tools, making it our Editors' Choice winner for midrange Android phones.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 07-05-2025
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80%
Bron: Tom's Guide

Is the Galaxy A36 my favorite budget phone? Not really. While I can see how it can suffice for the basic things, I would still recommend ponying up the extra $100 to get the Pixel 9a — for the extra performance boost, value, and richer AI features. That said, the Galaxy A36 is a well-designed phone that checks off most of the boxes. It’s even better in the battery life department over its predecessor, but it falls short in other areas like its low light camera performance, subpar performance, and the fact that its display compares poorly to other AMOLEDs.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 04-05-2025
Beoordeling: Totale score: 60%
Bron: Techlusive

After reviewing for more than 20 days, I could say that Samsung Galaxy A36 5G is a solid mid-raneg smartphone with notable improvements over its predecessor. However, the smartphone is not without its flaws and hence it could be better, especially in gaming section and demanding applications. The camera offers an incremental improvement, with few weak spots in low-light. The positive side is that the display offers a vibrant quality and the battery life is excellent. The design feels premium for the price range it belongs. If you are someone who is looking for a smartphone with reliable performance for everyday tasks, then this could be the best option. It offers good camera quality and solid software support and hence it is worth considering keeping the price range in mind.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 23-04-2025
Bron: The Mobile Indian

At Rs 32,999, there are phones that offer better performance than the Galaxy A36 5G. However, like the Galaxy A56 5G, what makes the A36 5G stand out is its overall balanced approach. Instead of just chasing raw power, it delivers a well-rounded experience. It might not be a gaming powerhouse, but it handles everyday tasks smoothly, offers a stable software experience, reliable battery life, decent cameras, and a stunning display — all wrapped in a solid build. That’s where the Galaxy A36 5G really shines.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 21-04-2025
Beoordeling: Totale score: 83% prestatie: 75% beeldscherm: 90% mobiliteit: 80% afwerking: 85%
Bron: Android Authority

There are brief moments when the A36 5G runs smoother, but those are the exception. That inconsistency doesn’t inspire much confidence, especially when this is how the phone behaves fresh out of the box. Hopefully, this is just a software optimization issue that Samsung can improve in a future update, but the underperformance in CPU benchmarks doesn’t leave me convinced that Samsung made the right choice to switch to a chip that can handle games better, but isn’t working for basic multitasking. If someone outside the US asked me whether to buy the Galaxy A36 5G, the answer would be a firm no. At this price point, you’ll find several better-performing options from brands like OnePlus, Motorola, Xiaomi, realme, and others — many of which offer stronger cameras and snappier performance for the same or even less money.In the US, however, the story’s a bit more complicated.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 18-04-2025
Beoordeling: Totale score: 60%
Bron: NLT

So, should you buy the Samsung Galaxy A36? I think this is a tough question to answer. At the price of RM1,499, I think this is actually quite expensive – particularly because of the Snapdragon 6 Gen 3. If Samsung opted for the Exynos 1480, I’d say it’s a much better deal. I think the biggest reason to buy the Galaxy A36 is because of One UI 7. Even with the Now Brief missing, One UI 7 is superbly powerful thanks to features such as the Modes and Routines and Samsung Wallet.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 31-03-2025
Bron: Phone Arena

See, it's natural for just about anyone to always lust after the most premium and spec'd-out flagships. It's just human nature to be awed by shiny things. However, the Galaxy A36 5G isn't a bad phone just because it's a value offering. It shapes up to be a decent proposition in the sub-$400 category. Yes, it will start at $399 when it hits the shelves on March 26, and that's a fairly attractive price tag for a Galaxy mid-ranger. Some issues that are immediately obvious when you take the phone is the slightly lackluster performance (it doesn't take long for the phone to lag a little) and it's camera, which only has the bare minimum, but for $400, you can't fault Samsung for cutting that many corners. Should you buy the Galaxy A36 5G? If you're on a tight budget, there are certainly worse ways to spend your money.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 31-03-2025
Beoordeling: Totale score: 57% prestatie: 82% beeldscherm: 70% mobiliteit: 70% afwerking: 60%
Bron: Yugatech

The Samsung Galaxy A36 5G retails for PHP 19,990 with 6GB RAM and 128GB of storage. There is also a unit with 8GB of RAM and 256GB of storage worth PHP 21,990. For our general consensus - this phone is still a great find! It stays true to what a mid-ranger should be, checking out all the essential boxes. It also gives you a little bit more at less than PHP 20,000. Potential buyers can expect an amazing multimedia consumption setup, good cameras, and an even better battery life. If users are looking for a bit more from Samsung under PHP 26,000, there's a clear alternative. The Samsung Galaxy A56 offers practically the same experience with a better build and more juice under the hood. Interested readers can feel free to check out our published review on the A56.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 31-03-2025
Bron: Tech Advisor

If you’re looking for the best value-for-money mid-range phone and don’t mind slightly slower charging, then the Galaxy A35 remains a great budget option. However, if you want the latest AI features, faster charging, and a noticeably brighter display, then the Galaxy A36 is worth the extra cost. The A36 feels more future-proof, thanks to its Qualcomm chip, AI tools, and better long-term usability, making it a better investment overall.
Vergelijking, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 28-03-2025
Bron: The Indian Express

When it comes to mid-range smartphones, brands like Nothing, OnePlus, and iQOO compete for consumer attention with superior build quality, impressive cameras, and a refined UI. With so many options at their disposal, it has become a tough call for consumers to zero in on a smartphone that is functional yet offers a glint of premium experience. South Korean smartphone maker Samsung recently launched its Galaxy A36 5G, making it the latest device to compete in the mid-range segment.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 27-03-2025
Beoordeling: Totale score: 70%
Bron: GSM Arena

The Galaxy A36 is the most balanced Samsung midranger from the new series with an improved design, more powerful graphics, and faster charging over the Galaxy A35. It has been promised 6 major Android updates, which is a lot. The Galaxy A36 delivered excellent screen brightness, and it is indeed slightly faster to charge. We are happy with its speakers' loudness and quality, and its overall performance is adequate. The battery life is adequate too, though not chart-topping for sure. The disappointment came from the lack of improvement in the camera department and the photo and video quality. The model has been sort of stuck since the Galaxy A34.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 26-03-2025
Beoordeling: Totale score: 76%
Bron: India Today

The Samsung Galaxy A56 is priced at Rs 41,999, while the Galaxy A36 comes in at Rs 32,999. While the Galaxy A36 is a good choice, the A56 offers better overall value, particularly due to its camera performance. Both smartphones deliver smooth day-to-day performance with long battery life and feature water resistance. Both the A56 and A36 are sleek, have large and attractive displays, and have a sturdy build, but if you care about smartphone photography, the A56 just makes a little more sense.
Vergelijking, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 25-03-2025
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80%
Bron: 91mobiles

The Galaxy A36 starts at Rs 32,999 for the 8GB+128GB variant, with the top-end 12GB+256GB model priced at Rs 38,999. For what it offers, the A36 holds good value – especially if you prioritise a polished software experience (with AI features) and a premium-looking design. Its cameras are reliable, though low-light performance could have been better. And, as expected from a Samsung device, the multimedia experience remains one of its biggest strengths. Its closest competitors are the Vivo V50 (review) and Redmi Note 14 Pro+ (review). The Vivo V50 has an advantage with higher performance and slightly better cameras, though its software experience isn’t as refined. The Redmi Note 14 Pro+ also offers longer battery life, faster charging, and a more durable build, while its camera performance is on par with the A36.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 18-03-2025
Beoordeling: Totale score: 78% prestatie: 70% beeldscherm: 80% mobiliteit: 75% afwerking: 80%
Bron: Think Digit

The Samsung Galaxy A36 5G shines with its flawless display, offering flagship-level brightness and color accuracy, making it ideal for media lovers. It features a refined design, reliable battery life, and a decent camera setup, though performance lags in intensive gaming. Samsung birthed the Galaxy A series line of mid-range smartphones over 10 years ago and has shipped more than 89 million phones since. Samsung has thrown its hat in the ring once again with the Galaxy A36, priced at Rs 32,999 in India. On paper, it promises a lot: a stunning Super AMOLED display, a capable Snapdragon processor, and a powerful triple-camera setup. But is the Galaxy A36 5G just another mid-range device, or does it bring enough to the table to justify its price tag? Let’s see whether Samsung’s latest A series phone is a hit or miss.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 11-03-2025
Beoordeling: Totale score: 65% prijs: 66% prestatie: 57% afwerking: 74%
Bron: Tech Spurt

Which mid-range smartphone you opt for will likely depend on your budget, more than anything else.
Vergelijking, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 02-03-2025
Bron: Unbox

This means that you’re also getting some of the AI functionality that we’ve been seeing on the new S series as well, like: Circle to Search with Audio, AI Select, and all the photography options we’ve come to know and love. We also got a chance to see their Best Face feature in action as well to make group shots a little easier at family gatherings.
Vergelijking, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 02-03-2025
Bron: NDTV Gadgets

To conclude, the Samsung Galaxy A56 and Samsung Galaxy A36 do bring some interesting features to the table. Whether be it new design language or dependable cameras coupled with six years of OS and security updates, both devices have a lot to offer in this price segment. However, can they survive this tough competition? We will be able to answer this in our upcoming review. So, stay tuned.
Vergelijking, online beschikbaar, Zeer kort, Datum: 02-03-2025
Bron: SuperSaf

Vergelijking, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 02-03-2025
Bron: GSM Arena

We have very little doubt that the Galaxy A36 and A56 will enjoy plenty of mass popularity. As we said, Samsung isn't changing too much and rocking the boat too much, which is understandable. Well, except for the removal of the microSD expansion slots, which is quite a bummer. Samsung Glaxy A36 and Galaxy A56 hands-on review Other than that, we personally enjoy the new design. The new chipsets and better cooling offer a nice performance boost on both phones compared to last year's models, and the thermal management and stability are very impressive. The addition of 45W charging is a nice little bonus. The overall camera quality seems to come with a slight upgrade, though it's a bit early to judge.
Vergelijking, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 02-03-2025
Bron: The Tech Chap

Vergelijking, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 02-03-2025
Bron: Expert Reviews

These phones aren’t the sexiest devices on God’s green Earth, and there’s nothing really groundbreaking here in terms of new features and design. They are a little improved on the design front, which is nice, but ultimately, they’re not all that much different from last year’s handsets from a hardware point of view. And that’s not a huge problem, of course. We liked these phones last year and we’re likely to like them this year as well. Samsung fans will love them. But we preferred the Nothing Phone (2a) last year and Google’s Pixel 8a delivers longer support and (currently) much lower prices with handsets available from around £330. With new Nothing mid-rangers and the Google Pixel 9A on the horizon, I’d respectfully suggest you hold onto your wallet.
Vergelijking, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 01-03-2025
Bron: WinFuture

Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 24-06-2025
Bron: PC Welt

Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 16-06-2025
Beoordeling: Totale score: 70%
Bron: Tablet Blog

Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 03-06-2025
Beoordeling: Totale score: 75%
Bron: Nextpit Germany

Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 20-05-2025
Beoordeling: Totale score: 70%
Bron: Inside Handy

Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 10-05-2025
Bron: PC Welt

Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 29-04-2025
Beoordeling: Totale score: 60%
Bron: Computerbild

Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 22-04-2025
Beoordeling: Totale score: 94%
Bron: Computerbild

Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 19-04-2025
Beoordeling: Totale score: 94%
Bron: Smartzone

Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 18-04-2025
Beoordeling: Totale score: 83% prestatie: 80% beeldscherm: 90% mobiliteit: 80% afwerking: 85%
Bron: Gamestar

Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 11-04-2025
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80%
Bron: Netzwelt

Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 04-04-2025
Beoordeling: Totale score: 84% prestatie: 70% beeldscherm: 78% ergonomie: 91%
Bron: Computerhoy

Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 02-04-2025
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80%
Bron: Target HD

Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 25-04-2025
Bron: Target HD

Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 23-04-2025
Bron: Techprincess IT

Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 02-04-2025
Bron: Andrea Galeazzi

Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 01-04-2025
Beoordeling: Totale score: 70% prijs: 60% beeldscherm: 82% mobiliteit: 75% afwerking: 75%
Bron: HDblog.it

Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 31-03-2025
Beoordeling: functionaliteiten: 80%
Bron: Tutto Android

Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 25-03-2025
Beoordeling: Totale score: 75%
Bron: Evo smart

Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 21-03-2025
Beoordeling: Totale score: 75% beeldscherm: 80% mobiliteit: 80% afwerking: 70%
Bron: Nextpit France

Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 20-05-2025
Beoordeling: Totale score: 70%
Bron: L' Eclaireur FNAC

Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 26-04-2025
Bron: Clubic

Vergelijking, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 18-04-2025
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80% prestatie: 80% beeldscherm: 90% mobiliteit: 70% afwerking: 80%
Bron: Frandroid

Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 08-04-2025
Beoordeling: Totale score: 70% prestatie: 80% beeldscherm: 80% mobiliteit: 70% afwerking: 70%
Bron: Les Numeriques

Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 05-04-2025
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80% prestatie: 80% beeldscherm: 80% mobiliteit: 60% afwerking: 80% ergonomie: 80%
Bron: PurePC

Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 19-04-2025
Bron: Co Nowego

Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 03-04-2025
Bron: Techno Strefa

Vergelijking, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 17-03-2025
Beoordeling: Totale score: 60%
Bron: Unite4buy

Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 09-02-2025
Bron: Hi-Tech Mail

Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 13-04-2025
Bron: MobilArena HU

Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 02-04-2025
Beoordeling: prijs: 70% beeldscherm: 80% mobiliteit: 70% afwerking: 90%
Bron: Zive

Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 13-04-2025
Beoordeling: Totale score: 70%
Bron: Viettelstore

Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 09-06-2025
Bron: Viettelstore

Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 26-04-2025
Bron: FPT shop

Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 18-04-2025
Bron: FPT shop

Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 31-03-2025
Bron: Viettelstore

Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 27-03-2025
Bron: FPT shop

Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 25-03-2025
Bron: FPT shop

Hands-On, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 25-03-2025
Bron: Viettelstore

Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 21-03-2025
Bron: Viettelstore

Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 17-03-2025
Bron: The Gioididong

Hands-On, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 12-03-2025
Bron: Jagat Review

Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 28-03-2025
Bron: Laptop.bg

Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 28-04-2025
Bron: Mobil.se

Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 26-03-2025
Beoordeling: Totale score: 74% beeldscherm: 80%
Bron: M3 PC för alla

Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 24-03-2025
Beoordeling: Totale score: 60%
Bron: Go4it.ro

Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 09-05-2025
Bron: Computerblog.ro

Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 08-04-2025
Commentaar
Qualcomm Adreno 710:
De meeste niet-veeleisende huidige games kunnen vloeiend draaien. Wees voorbereid op verminderde grafische weergave door lage detailinstellingen en lage resoluties. Toch verschaffen deze kaarten voldoende prestatie voor kantoor taken en video bekijken (niet voor HD videos).
>> Meer informatie kan gevonden worden in ons Vergelijk van Mobiele Grafische Kaarten en de passende Benchmark Tabel.
SD 6 Gen 1: SoC voor het middensegment met 8 Kryo-kernen (4x ARM Cortex A78 2,4 GHz prestatiecluster, 4x ARM Cortex A55 met 1,8 efficiencycluster) en een 5G-modem (tot 2900 Mbps download). De chip is vervaardigd met behulp van het moderne 4nm-proces.
>> Meer informatie kan gevonden worden in ons Vergelijk van Mobiele Processors.
6.70": Er bestaan maar weinig smartphones met een groter scherm.
Grote schermformaten laten hogere resoluties toe. Details zoals letters zijn groter. Anderzijds is het energieverbruik lager bij kleine schermdiagonalen en de toestellen zijn kleiner, lichter en goedkoper.
>>Om de fijnheid van het scherm te vinden, kijk in onze DPI-lijst.
Samsung: Samsung Group is het grootste Zuid-Koreaanse conglomeraat en werd opgericht in 1938. Samsung Group had in 2014 489.000 mensen in dienst en is een van 's werelds grootste bedrijven in termen van omzet en marktsterkte. De naam Samsung betekent "Drie Sterren" in het Koreaans en staat voor de drie zonen van de oprichter van het bedrijf. Het bedrijf werd in 1938 opgericht als kruidenierswinkel. Met haar dochteronderneming Samsung Electronics, opgericht in 1969, begon Samsung met de productie van elektrotechnische artikelen, met de focus op consumentenelektronica en huishoudelijke apparaten in een vroeg stadium. Andere branches waarin het grote concern actief is, zijn onder meer machinebouw, auto's (Hyundai), verzekeringen, groothandel, onroerend goed en vrije tijd. Samsung produceert een breed scala aan elektronische producten, waaronder smartphones, televisies, huishoudelijke apparaten en halfgeleiders. De Galaxy-smartphonelijn van het bedrijf is een van de meest populaire ter wereld. Samsung is ook een belangrijke speler in de halfgeleiderindustrie en maakt geheugenchips en processors voor veel andere elektronicafabrikanten.
73.76%: Dit cijfer is slecht. De meeste notebooks hebben een hoger cijfer. Dit is niet aanbevolen bij aankoop.
>> De verdere informatie kan worden gevonden in onze hulp voor de aankoop van laptops.