Notebookcheck

Kort testrapport Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro Smartphone - Krachtige gaming-smartphone met een nadeel

5G gaming machine. Omdat de Xiaomi-telefoon een breed scala aan functies biedt voor ongeveer 670 euro, is de Black Shark 3 Pro niet alleen interessant voor gamers: hij wordt geleverd met een 90 Hz, 1440p OLED-paneel, een aanraakbemonsteringsfrequentie van 270 Hz , 65 Watt snelladen, Wi-Fi 6, stereoluidsprekers, een 64 MP camera, 5G en een Snapdragon 865. Wat wil je nog meer? Lees verder om erachter te komen hoe de Shark 3 Pro het doet in onze recensie.
Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Florian Schmitt, Felicitas Krohn,
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro (Black Shark Serie)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 8 x 2.4 - 2.8 GHz, Cortex-A77 / A55 (Kryo 585)
Grafische kaart
Geheugen
12288 MB 
Beeldscherm
7.1 inch 19.5:9, 3120 x 1440 pixel 484 PPI, capacitief touchscreen, AMOLED, glimmend: ja, HDR, 90 Hz
Opslag
256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash, 256 GB 
, 219 GB beschikbaar
Verbindingen
1 USB 2.0, Audio Verbindingen: 3.5-mm koptelefoon poort, 1 Vingerafdruklezer, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensoren: Versnellingsmeter, gyroscoop, naderingssensor, kompas, USB-C, OTG, Miracast, P2i-rating
Netwerkmogelijkheden
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5.0, 5G NR NSA (N41, N78, N79); FDD LTE ( B1, B2, B3, B4, B5, B7, B8, B12, B17, B18, B19, B20, B26, B28); TDD LTE (B34, B38, B39, B40, B41); WCDMA(B1, B2, B4, B5, B6, B8, B9, B19); GSM (B2, B3 B5, B8), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Afmetingen
hoogte x breedte x diepte (in mm): 10.1 x 177.8 x 83.3
Batterij
5000 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Besturingssysteem
Android 10
Camera
Primary Camera: 64 MPix (f/1.8, 26mm, 1/1.72", 0.8µm) + 13 MP (f/2.25) + 5 MP (f/2.2)
Secondary Camera: 20 MPix f/2.2, 1/3", 0.9 µm
Bijkomende functionaliteiten
Luidsprekers: Stereo, Toetsenbord: virtueel toetsenbord, Quick charger, USB Type-C-cable, SIM tool, protective case, screen protector, quick-start guide, JoyUI, 12 Maanden Garantie, Widevine L3 (China), A-GPS, GLONASS, BeiDou, QZSS, LTE Cat 24, fanless
Gewicht
253 g, Voeding: 189 g
Prijs
730 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Competing Devices

Evaluatie
Datum
Model
Gewicht
Drive
Formaat
Resolutie
Best Price
85 %
07-2020
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro
SD 865, Adreno 650
253 g256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash7.1"3120x1440
84 %
Nubia RedMagic 5G
SD 865, Adreno 650
218 g256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash6.65"2340x1080
88 %
06-2020
OnePlus 8
SD 865, Adreno 650
180 g256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash6.55"2400x1080
88 %
05-2020
Xiaomi Mi 10
SD 865, Adreno 650
208 g128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash6.67"2340x1080
84 %
01-2020
Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G
SD 765G, Adreno 620
171 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.5"2400x1080
82 %
02-2020
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
SD 765G, Adreno 620
208 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.67"2400x1080
87 %
08-2019
Asus ROG Phone 2
SD 855+, Adreno 640
240 g512 GB UFS 3.0 Flash6.59"2340x1080
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro smartphone review
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro smartphone review
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro smartphone review
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro smartphone review
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro smartphone review
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro smartphone review
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro smartphone review
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro smartphone review
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro smartphone review
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro smartphone review
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro smartphone review

Size Comparison

177.8 mm 83.3 mm 10.1 mm 253 g170.99 mm 77.6 mm 9.48 mm 240 g168.6 mm 78 mm 9.8 mm 218 g165.3 mm 76.6 mm 8.79 mm 208 g162.6 mm 74.8 mm 8.96 mm 208 g160.2 mm 72.9 mm 8 mm 180 g159.4 mm 72.4 mm 7.7 mm 171 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Adreno 650, SD 865, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
946 (min: 911, max: 960) MBit/s ∼100% +16%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
903 (min: 881, max: 916) MBit/s ∼95% +11%
OnePlus 8
Adreno 650, SD 865, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
894 (min: 864, max: 925) MBit/s ∼95% +9%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 865, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
817 (min: 785, max: 843) MBit/s ∼86%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
687 (min: 345, max: 697) MBit/s ∼73% -16%
Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
623 (min: 611, max: 633) MBit/s ∼66% -24%
Asus ROG Phone 2
Adreno 640, SD 855+, 512 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
605 (min: 520, max: 657) MBit/s ∼64% -26%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 1414, n=562)
267 MBit/s ∼28% -67%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
OnePlus 8
Adreno 650, SD 865, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
937 (min: 466, max: 960) MBit/s ∼100% +7%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Adreno 650, SD 865, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
926 (min: 463, max: 960) MBit/s ∼99% +6%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 865, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
876 (min: 785, max: 909) MBit/s ∼93%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
867 (min: 440, max: 907) MBit/s ∼93% -1%
Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
642 (min: 549, max: 664) MBit/s ∼69% -27%
Asus ROG Phone 2
Adreno 640, SD 855+, 512 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
530 (min: 410, max: 606) MBit/s ∼57% -39%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
341 (min: 280, max: 399) MBit/s ∼36% -61%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 1599, n=562)
253 MBit/s ∼27% -71%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700710720730740750760770780790800810820830840850860870880890900910Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø817 (785-843)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø876 (785-909)
GPS Black Shark 3 Pro
GPS Black Shark 3 Pro
GPS Black Shark 3 Pro
GPS Black Shark 3 Pro
GPS Black Shark 3 Pro
GPS Black Shark 3 Pro
GPS Garmin Edge 520
GPS Garmin Edge 520
GPS Garmin Edge 520
GPS Garmin Edge 520
GPS Garmin Edge 520
GPS Garmin Edge 520
64 MP cam
64 MP cam
Ultra wide angle
Ultra wide angle
5x zoom
5x zoom

Beeldvergelijking

Bekijk een scène en navigeer binnen het eerste beeld. Eén klik wijzigt het zoomniveau. Eén klik op het ingezoomde beeld opent het origineel in een nieuw venster. Het eerste beeld toont de verschaalde foto van het testtoestel.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
ColorChecker
27.6 ∆E
46.2 ∆E
36 ∆E
33.9 ∆E
39.8 ∆E
55 ∆E
46.2 ∆E
31.4 ∆E
35.1 ∆E
26.4 ∆E
56.3 ∆E
57.1 ∆E
27.5 ∆E
43.9 ∆E
31.7 ∆E
62.8 ∆E
37.3 ∆E
41.8 ∆E
58.5 ∆E
61 ∆E
46.8 ∆E
34.3 ∆E
22.8 ∆E
12.3 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro: 40.48 ∆E min: 12.31 - max: 62.81 ∆E
ColorChecker
18.8 ∆E
10.1 ∆E
16.1 ∆E
16.6 ∆E
13.7 ∆E
8.4 ∆E
9.9 ∆E
17.8 ∆E
12.1 ∆E
8.7 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
14 ∆E
11.7 ∆E
12.4 ∆E
1.8 ∆E
11.1 ∆E
13.8 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
8.3 ∆E
11.7 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro: 10.49 ∆E min: 1.77 - max: 18.76 ∆E
569
cd/m²
566
cd/m²
583
cd/m²
567
cd/m²
570
cd/m²
570
cd/m²
619
cd/m²
624
cd/m²
630
cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 630 cd/m² Gemiddelde: 588.7 cd/m² Minimum: 2.17 cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling: 90 %
Helderheid in Batterij-modus: 293 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Zwart: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.65 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.8
ΔE Greyscale 4.9 | 0.64-98 Ø6.1
99.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.205
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro
AMOLED, 3120x1440, 7.1
Nubia RedMagic 5G
OLED, 2340x1080, 6.65
OnePlus 8
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.55
Xiaomi Mi 10
Super AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.67
Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.5
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
LCD IPS, 2400x1080, 6.67
Asus ROG Phone 2
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.59
Screen
-37%
49%
48%
4%
25%
-5%
Brightness middle
570
593
4%
778
36%
786
38%
774
36%
658
15%
580
2%
Brightness
589
601
2%
783
33%
791
34%
778
32%
643
9%
599
2%
Brightness Distribution
90
92
2%
95
6%
96
7%
95
6%
93
3%
91
1%
Black Level *
0.49
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.65
8.1
-74%
0.9
81%
1.1
76%
5.28
-14%
1.8
61%
4.9
-5%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
7.61
16.2
-113%
2.2
71%
2.2
71%
8.55
-12%
4.4
42%
9.1
-20%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
4.9
7.1
-45%
1.7
65%
1.8
63%
6.2
-27%
3.8
22%
5.4
-10%
Gamma
2.205 100%
2.28 96%
2.25 98%
2.26 97%
2.292 96%
2.22 99%
2.17 101%
CCT
7500 87%
7566 86%
6481 100%
6315 103%
7319 89%
6255 104%
7487 87%
Contrast
1343

* ... kleiner is beter

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Om de schermhelderheid te verlagen schakelen sommige laptops het backlight erg snel aan en uit. Dit gebeurt aan een dergelijk hoge frequentie dat het niet zichtbaar is voor het menselijk oog. Als de frequentie te laag is kunnen personen met gevoelige ogen geïrriteerd geraken, hoofdpijn krijgen en zelfs flickering waarnemen.
Screen flickering / PWM waargenomen 362 Hz

Het backlight van het scherm flikkert aan 362 Hz (hoogstwaarschijnlijk met PWM - Pulse-Width Modulation) .

De frequentie van 362 Hz is relatief hoog en de meeste mensen die gevoelig zijn aan flickering zouden dit dus niet mogen waarnemen of geïrriteerde ogen krijgen. Er zijn echter rapporten die beweren dat sommige mensen toch flickering met 500 Hz en hoger kunnen waarnemen: opgelet dus.

Ter vergelijking: 51 % van alle geteste toestellen maakten geen gebruik van PWM om de schermhelderheid te verlagen. Als het wel werd gebruikt, werd een gemiddelde van 17916 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 2500000) Hz waargenomen.

Responstijd Scherm

De responstijden van het scherm tonen hoe snel het scherm in staat is om van één kleur naar de andere te veranderen. Trage responstijden kunnen aanleiding geven tot 'nabeelden' rond bewegende objecten of het scherm wazig maken (blur). Vooral spelers van snelle 3D-games hebben baat bij een scherm met snelle responstijden.
       Responstijd Zwart naar Wit
8 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd↗ 5 ms stijging
↘ 3 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde snelle responstijden in onze tests en zou geschikt moeten zijn voor games.
Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.8 (minimum) tot 240 (maximum) ms. » 7 % van alle toestellen zijn beter.
Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd beter is dan het gemiddelde (24.6 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.
       Responstijd 50% Grijs naar 80% Grijs
10 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd↗ 5 ms stijging
↘ 5 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde prima responstijden in onze tests maar is misschien wat te traag voor competitieve games.
Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.9 (minimum) tot 636 (maximum) ms. » 9 % van alle toestellen zijn beter.
Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd beter is dan het gemiddelde (39 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.
Geekbench 5.1 / 5.2
Vulkan Score 5.1 (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
3008 Points ∼100%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
2487 Points ∼83% -17%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
2663 Points ∼89% -11%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
2549 Points ∼85% -15%
Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
1004 Points ∼33% -67%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
1035 Points ∼34% -66%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (2487 - 3259, n=8)
2723 Points ∼91% -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (70 - 4043, n=66)
1633 Points ∼54% -46%
OpenCL Score 5.1 (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
3080 Points ∼100%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
2954 Points ∼96% -4%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
3001 Points ∼97% -3%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
2829 Points ∼92% -8%
Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
1178 Points ∼38% -62%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
1212 Points ∼39% -61%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (2829 - 3080, n=8)
2981 Points ∼97% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (272 - 4739, n=61)
1759 Points ∼57% -43%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
3361 Points ∼98%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
3076 Points ∼90% -8%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
3427 Points ∼100% +2%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
3309 Points ∼97% -2%
Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
1676 Points ∼49% -50%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
1520 Points ∼44% -55%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (3076 - 3449, n=10)
3312 Points ∼97% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (445 - 3531, n=89)
1990 Points ∼58% -41%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
903 Points ∼98%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
909 Points ∼99% +1%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
919 Points ∼100% +2%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
910 Points ∼99% +1%
Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
595 Points ∼65% -34%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
569 Points ∼62% -37%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (903 - 924, n=10)
913 Points ∼99% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (124 - 1342, n=89)
567 Points ∼62% -37%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
10945 Points ∼85%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
12879 Points ∼100% +18%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
10800 Points ∼84% -1%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
10613 Points ∼82% -3%
Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
7896 Points ∼61% -28%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
9989 Points ∼78% -9%
Asus ROG Phone 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 12288
11690 Points ∼91% +7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (9822 - 13202, n=11)
11312 Points ∼88% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2630 - 13202, n=490)
5834 Points ∼45% -47%
Work performance score (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
11839 Points ∼78%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
13954 Points ∼92% +18%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
13079 Points ∼86% +10%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
11850 Points ∼78% 0%
Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
9454 Points ∼62% -20%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
10689 Points ∼70% -10%
Asus ROG Phone 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 12288
15193 Points ∼100% +28%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (11839 - 19711, n=10)
13515 Points ∼89% +14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1077 - 19711, n=648)
6373 Points ∼42% -46%
3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
57583 Points ∼100%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
26182 Points ∼45% -55%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
27026 Points ∼47% -53%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
Points ∼0% -100%
Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
19888 Points ∼35% -65%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
23203 Points ∼40% -60%
Asus ROG Phone 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 12288
41296 Points ∼72% -28%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (26182 - 58293, n=9)
36070 Points ∼63% -37%
Average of class Smartphone
  (735 - 58293, n=766)
15263 Points ∼27% -73%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
149468 Points ∼99%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
150654 Points ∼100% +1%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
144611 Points ∼96% -3%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
Points ∼0% -100%
Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
66655 Points ∼44% -55%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
68634 Points ∼46% -54%
Asus ROG Phone 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 12288
113347 Points ∼75% -24%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (144611 - 154375, n=9)
148492 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (536 - 209431, n=764)
25897 Points ∼17% -83%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
110468 Points ∼100%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
73143 Points ∼66% -34%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
72524 Points ∼66% -34%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
Points ∼0% -100%
Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
43778 Points ∼40% -60%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
47824 Points ∼43% -57%
Asus ROG Phone 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 12288
81679 Points ∼74% -26%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (72524 - 112989, n=9)
85586 Points ∼77% -23%
Average of class Smartphone
  (662 - 112989, n=764)
20366 Points ∼18% -82%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
203 fps ∼98%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
206 fps ∼100% +1%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
207 fps ∼100% +2%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
202 fps ∼98% 0%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
95 fps ∼46% -53%
Asus ROG Phone 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 12288
166 fps ∼80% -18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (202 - 207, n=10)
204 fps ∼99% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.5 - 322, n=772)
43.9 fps ∼21% -78%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
90 fps ∼100%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
90 fps ∼100% 0%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
60 fps ∼67% -33%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
90 fps ∼100% 0%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
86 fps ∼96% -4%
Asus ROG Phone 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 12288
61 fps ∼68% -32%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (60 - 90, n=10)
72 fps ∼80% -20%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 120, n=781)
30.5 fps ∼34% -66%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
122 fps ∼97%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
126 fps ∼100% +3%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
125 fps ∼99% +2%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
123 fps ∼98% +1%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
54 fps ∼43% -56%
Asus ROG Phone 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 12288
100 fps ∼79% -18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (120 - 126, n=10)
124 fps ∼98% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.8 - 175, n=677)
25.8 fps ∼20% -79%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
68 fps ∼77%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
88 fps ∼100% +29%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
60 fps ∼68% -12%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
88 fps ∼100% +29%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
48 fps ∼55% -29%
Asus ROG Phone 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 12288
61 fps ∼69% -10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (58 - 88, n=10)
69 fps ∼78% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 115, n=685)
21.8 fps ∼25% -68%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
86 fps ∼98%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
74 fps ∼84% -14%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
88 fps ∼100% +2%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
86 fps ∼98% 0%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
37 fps ∼42% -57%
Asus ROG Phone 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 12288
71 fps ∼81% -17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (74 - 88, n=11)
85.3 fps ∼97% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.87 - 117, n=540)
20.8 fps ∼24% -76%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
43 fps ∼57%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
51 fps ∼68% +19%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
60 fps ∼80% +40%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
75 fps ∼100% +74%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
33 fps ∼44% -23%
Asus ROG Phone 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 12288
58 fps ∼77% +35%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (43 - 77, n=11)
58.1 fps ∼77% +35%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 110, n=542)
18.9 fps ∼25% -56%
GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
27 fps ∼87%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
28 fps ∼90% +4%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
31 fps ∼100% +15%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
29 fps ∼94% +7%
Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
13 fps ∼42% -52%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
8.9 fps ∼29% -67%
Asus ROG Phone 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 12288
27 fps ∼87% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (18 - 31, n=11)
27.5 fps ∼89% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.61 - 60, n=288)
11.2 fps ∼36% -59%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
20 fps ∼100%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
20 fps ∼100% 0%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
20 fps ∼100% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
20 fps ∼100% 0%
Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
8.6 fps ∼43% -57%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
13 fps ∼65% -35%
Asus ROG Phone 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 12288
18 fps ∼90% -10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (20 - 20, n=11)
20 fps ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.21 - 101, n=286)
8.07 fps ∼40% -60%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
53 fps ∼100%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
44 fps ∼83% -17%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
48 fps ∼91% -9%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
46 fps ∼87% -13%
Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
20 fps ∼38% -62%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
21 fps ∼40% -60%
Asus ROG Phone 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 12288
41 fps ∼77% -23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (28 - 53, n=11)
43.6 fps ∼82% -18%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 60, n=292)
16.6 fps ∼31% -69%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
27 fps ∼50%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
54 fps ∼100% +100%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
54 fps ∼100% +100%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
53 fps ∼98% +96%
Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
24 fps ∼44% -11%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
23 fps ∼43% -15%
Asus ROG Phone 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 12288
47 fps ∼87% +74%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (27 - 54, n=11)
51 fps ∼94% +89%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 257, n=291)
19.3 fps ∼36% -29%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
51 fps ∼98%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
51 fps ∼98% 0%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
52 fps ∼100% +2%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
50 fps ∼96% -2%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
21 fps ∼40% -59%
Asus ROG Phone 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 12288
43 fps ∼83% -16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (49 - 52, n=11)
50.6 fps ∼97% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 73, n=465)
14 fps ∼27% -73%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
25 fps ∼54%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
42 fps ∼91% +68%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
46 fps ∼100% +84%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
42 fps ∼91% +68%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
19 fps ∼41% -24%
Asus ROG Phone 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 12288
38 fps ∼83% +52%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (25 - 46, n=11)
38.9 fps ∼85% +56%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.1 - 60, n=469)
12.5 fps ∼27% -50%
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
572807 Points ∼94%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
607937 Points ∼100% +6%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
563466 Points ∼93% -2%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
566256 Points ∼93% -1%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
298925 Points ∼49% -48%
Asus ROG Phone 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 12288
501784 Points ∼83% -12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (557310 - 607937, n=11)
580619 Points ∼96% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53335 - 607937, n=94)
315184 Points ∼52% -45%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
1429 Points ∼95%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
1505 Points ∼100% +5%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
1498 Points ∼100% +5%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
1276 Points ∼85% -11%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
1378 Points ∼92% -4%
Asus ROG Phone 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 12288
1465 Points ∼97% +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (1276 - 1576, n=10)
1450 Points ∼96% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7 - 1745, n=709)
807 Points ∼54% -44%
Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
11445 Points ∼98%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
11648 Points ∼99% +2%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
11654 Points ∼99% +2%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
11730 Points ∼100% +2%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
5087 Points ∼43% -56%
Asus ROG Phone 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 12288
10467 Points ∼89% -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (11445 - 11842, n=10)
11655 Points ∼99% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (18 - 16996, n=709)
2428 Points ∼21% -79%
Memory (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
5688 Points ∼68%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
8398 Points ∼100% +48%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
6912 Points ∼82% +22%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
7450 Points ∼89% +31%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
5278 Points ∼63% -7%
Asus ROG Phone 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 12288
6077 Points ∼72% +7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (5564 - 8874, n=10)
7263 Points ∼86% +28%
Average of class Smartphone
  (21 - 8874, n=709)
1805 Points ∼21% -68%
System (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
8622 Points ∼86%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
9723 Points ∼97% +13%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
10021 Points ∼100% +16%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
9810 Points ∼98% +14%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
6870 Points ∼69% -20%
Asus ROG Phone 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 12288
8693 Points ∼87% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (8421 - 10147, n=10)
9643 Points ∼96% +12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (369 - 14189, n=709)
3374 Points ∼34% -61%
Overall (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
5302 Points ∼86%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
6149 Points ∼100% +16%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
5897 Points ∼96% +11%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
5752 Points ∼94% +8%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3990 Points ∼65% -25%
Asus ROG Phone 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 12288
5335 Points ∼87% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (5264 - 6273, n=10)
5845 Points ∼95% +10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 6273, n=709)
1716 Points ∼28% -68%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Asus ROG Phone 2 (Chrome 78)
67.333 Points ∼100% +27%
Nubia RedMagic 5G (Chrome 83)
61.492 Points ∼91% +16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (50.9 - 69.5, n=10)
61.3 Points ∼91% +16%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G (Chrome 80)
53.145 Points ∼79% 0%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro (Chrome 83)
53.053 Points ∼79%
OnePlus 8 (Chrome 83)
51.341 Points ∼76% -3%
Xiaomi Mi 10 (Xiaomi Browser V11.4.23)
50.878 Points ∼76% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (9.13 - 140, n=171)
40.2 Points ∼60% -24%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro (Chrome 83)
67.7 runs/min ∼100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (50.8 - 74.5, n=10)
65.4 runs/min ∼97% -3%
Nubia RedMagic 5G (Chrome 83)
59.6 runs/min ∼88% -12%
Xiaomi Mi 10 (Xiaomi Browser V11.4.23)
56.2 runs/min ∼83% -17%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G (Chrome 80)
54.9 runs/min ∼81% -19%
OnePlus 8 (Chrome 83)
50.8 runs/min ∼75% -25%
Average of class Smartphone (6.42 - 158, n=155)
43.1 runs/min ∼64% -36%
Asus ROG Phone 2 (Chrome 78)
39.1 runs/min ∼58% -42%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Xiaomi Mi 10 (Xiaomi Browser V11.4.23)
118 Points ∼100% +17%
Asus ROG Phone 2 (Chrome 78)
111 Points ∼94% +10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (99 - 118, n=10)
103 Points ∼87% +2%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro (Chrome 83)
101 Points ∼86%
OnePlus 8 (Chrome 83)
99 Points ∼84% -2%
Nubia RedMagic 5G (Chrome 83)
99 Points ∼84% -2%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G (Chrome 80)
80 Points ∼68% -21%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 184, n=236)
69.8 Points ∼59% -31%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Asus ROG Phone 2
24571 Points ∼100% +17%
Xiaomi Mi 10 (Xiaomi Browser V11.4.23)
22016 Points ∼90% +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (15745 - 24369, n=10)
21331 Points ∼87% +2%
Nubia RedMagic 5G (Chrome 83)
21048 Points ∼86% 0%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro (Chrome 83)
20976 Points ∼85%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G (Chrome 80)
18809 Points ∼77% -10%
OnePlus 8 (Chrome 83)
15745 Points ∼64% -25%
Average of class Smartphone (894 - 49388, n=767)
7690 Points ∼31% -63%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (1914 - 59466, n=793)
9892 ms * ∼100% -380%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G (Chrome 80)
2787 ms * ∼28% -35%
OnePlus 8 (Chrome 83)
2538.1 ms * ∼26% -23%
Nubia RedMagic 5G (Chrome 83)
2401.34 ms * ∼24% -16%
Xiaomi Mi 10 (Xiaomi Browser V11.4.23)
2103.5 ms * ∼21% -2%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro (Chrome 83)
2061.3 ms * ∼21%
Asus ROG Phone 2 (Chrome 78)
2006.5 ms * ∼20% +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (2000 - 2538, n=11)
1956 ms * ∼20% +5%

* ... kleiner is beter

Xiaomi Black Shark 3 ProNubia RedMagic 5GOnePlus 8Xiaomi Mi 10Oppo Reno3 Pro 5GXiaomi Redmi K30 5GAsus ROG Phone 2Average 256 GB UFS 3.0 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-14%
3%
-3%
-33%
-51%
-24%
-11%
-80%
Random Write 4KB
261.45
193.57
-26%
203.85
-22%
215.95
-17%
145
-45%
100.99
-61%
165.26
-37%
180 (24.8 - 272, n=17)
-31%
33.1 (0.14 - 319, n=856)
-87%
Random Read 4KB
218.2
201.64
-8%
215
-1%
207.04
-5%
159.1
-27%
96.8
-56%
165.95
-24%
205 (169 - 265, n=17)
-6%
57.1 (1.59 - 324, n=856)
-74%
Sequential Write 256KB
657.92
388.38
-41%
747.87
14%
679.51
3%
476.3
-28%
312.76
-52%
386.4
-41%
532 (387 - 756, n=17)
-19%
122 (2.99 - 911, n=856)
-81%
Sequential Read 256KB
1398.36
1654.41
18%
1706.7
22%
1498.15
7%
960.5
-31%
889.67
-36%
1487.05
6%
1592 (1398 - 1789, n=17)
14%
329 (12.1 - 1802, n=856)
-76%
PUBG Mobile
010203040506070Tooltip
: Ø59.9 (57-61)
Asphalt 9 Legends
010203040Tooltip
: Ø30 (29-31)
Dead Trigger 2
010203040506070Tooltip
: Ø60.1 (60-61)
Max. Belasting
 38 °C39.6 °C39.5 °C 
 38.3 °C40.1 °C40.2 °C 
 38.3 °C39.6 °C39.4 °C 
Maximum: 40.2 °C
Gemiddelde: 39.2 °C
35.4 °C38.8 °C36.1 °C
36 °C39.9 °C35.7 °C
36.4 °C39.3 °C36.1 °C
Maximum: 39.9 °C
Gemiddelde: 37.1 °C
Stroomadapter (max.)  39.9 °C | Kamertemperatuur 21.6 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 39.2 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 33 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.2 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 35.4 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.9 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.6 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 33 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2035.435.12539.736.9312828.44027.4315029.834.36325.826.58022.22610023.424.112521.222.716019.230.920018.940.22501949.531517.252.84001657.950016.764.863018.865.580014.770.1100015.673.512501474.9160013.975.6200014.474.7250014.773.6315014.372.840001571.9500015.773.2630015.860.4800015.763.41000016.260.61250015.7581600015.948.9SPL71.86327.684.3N26.315155.8median 15.8median 63.4Delta1.912.932.828.826.228.123.32521.925.52831.119.924.419.122.519.926.116.531.619.644.517.544.317.55113.956.713.961.415.865.215.265.61466.3146713.970.313.473.113.874.514.374.91473.414.572.714.670.914.569.414.768.415.165.41561.914.849.326.583.50.854.8median 14.6median 65.619.9hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseXiaomi Black Shark 3 ProXiaomi Mi 10
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.6% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (26% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 64% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 27% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 77% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 18% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Xiaomi Mi 10 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 9% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 37% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 56% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Stroomgebruik
Uit / Standbydarklight 0.1 / 0.2 Watt
Inactiefdarkmidlight 1.5 / 2.3 / 3.1 Watt
Belasting midlight 7.4 / 12.3 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro
5000 mAh
OnePlus 8
4300 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 10
4780 mAh
Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G
4025 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
4500 mAh
Asus ROG Phone 2
6000 mAh
Nubia RedMagic 5G
4500 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
31%
46%
24%
49%
31%
17%
39%
Idle Minimum *
1.5
0.9
40%
0.53
65%
0.66
56%
0.68
55%
1.1
27%
1.251 (0.53 - 2.2, n=10)
17%
0.887 (0.2 - 3.4, n=866)
41%
Idle Average *
2.3
2.3
-0%
1.46
37%
2.37
-3%
1.05
54%
1.5
35%
2.25 (1.19 - 3.43, n=10)
2%
1.754 (0.6 - 6.2, n=865)
24%
Idle Maximum *
3.1
2.33
25%
1.52
51%
2.42
22%
1.07
65%
1.71
45%
2.55 (1.23 - 4, n=10)
18%
2.04 (0.74 - 6.6, n=866)
34%
Load Average *
7.4
3.5
53%
3.83
48%
6.8
8%
4.14
44%
4.84
35%
5.28 (3.5 - 7.4, n=10)
29%
4.09 (0.8 - 10.8, n=860)
45%
Load Maximum *
12.3
7.68
38%
8.89
28%
7.5
39%
9.05
26%
10.42
15%
9.82 (7.68 - 12.3, n=10)
20%
6.04 (1.2 - 14.2, n=860)
51%

* ... kleiner is beter

Batterijduur
Inactief (zonder WLAN, minimale helderheid)
26h 29min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
12h 47min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
16h 12min
Belast (maximale helderheid)
4h 07min
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro
5000 mAh
OnePlus 8
4300 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 10
4780 mAh
Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G
4025 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
4500 mAh
Asus ROG Phone 2
6000 mAh
Nubia RedMagic 5G
4500 mAh
Batterijduur
1%
2%
14%
3%
11%
-30%
Reader / Idle
1589
1374
-14%
1789
13%
2083
31%
H.264
972
1096
13%
1126
16%
734
-24%
WiFi v1.3
767
1045
36%
662
-14%
876
14%
802
5%
851
11%
614
-20%
Load
247
168
-32%
226
-9%
243
-2%
149
-40%

Pro

+ goede gaming-functies
+ snelle wifi
+ 90 Hz AMOLED-paneel
+ hoge prestaties
+ 5G-ondersteuning
+ 65 Watt snelladen
+ veel accessoires
+ dubbele SIM + 3,5 mm hoofdtelefoonaansluiting
+ snelle UFS 3.0-opslag
+ Stereo luidsprekers...

Contra

- ... met zwakke punten
- niet-uitbreidbare opslag
- geen IP-certificering
- donker beeldscherm met uitgeschakelde omgevingslichtsensor
- geen draadloos opladen
- USB 2.0

Samenvatting - Big, Bigger, Black Shark 3 Pro

Getest: Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro. Testmodel geleverd door:
Getest: Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro. Testmodel geleverd door:

Voor het volledige, Engelse testrapport, klik hier.

De Black Shark 3 Pro biedt uitstekende gaminghardware voor liefhebbers van mobiel gamen. Het enorme OLED-paneel heeft zowel een hoge verversingssnelheid als een hoge samplefrequentie. Ondanks de resolutie van 1440p zijn de prestaties van de gaming-smartphone uitstekend, zijn de looptijden behoorlijk en heeft de warmteontwikkeling nauwelijks invloed op de beschikbare prestaties - zelfs zonder het optionele accessoire "FunCooler Pro". Speciale schouderknoppen en stereoluidsprekers dragen bij aan de algehele game-ervaring, hoewel de luidsprekers qua kwaliteit tekortschieten in vergelijking met die van de Xiaomi Mi 10.

Afgezien van kleinere klachten, die betrekking hebben op het zwakke display in handmatige modus zonder de omgevingslichtsensor, ietwat losse Master Trigger-knoppen en een gebrek aan opties voor opslaguitbreiding, is één probleem vooral irritant op een smartphone die bedoeld is voor gamen: de softwarebeperkingen van de Chinese fabrikant. Ze beperken het OLED-paneel tot onder de maximale vernieuwingsfrequentie van 90 Hz in onze testgames, hoewel PUBG mobile en Dead Trigger 2 beide theoretisch 120 FPS ondersteunen - hier lijkt Black Shark een limiet van 60 FPS te hebben geïmplementeerd. Het feit dat de Redmi K30 5G in onze test de volledige 120 FPS bereikt, verergert deze frustratie. We hopen dat Black Shark dit zo snel mogelijk zal oplossen.

De Black Shark 3 Pro is een genot voor gamers.

Voor degenen die het 7.1-inch beeldscherm te groot vinden, is de "normale" Black Shark 3, die al in Europa verkrijgbaar is met 8 GB RAM en 128 GB opslag, een interessant alternatief.

Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro - 30-05-2020 v7
Marcus Herbrich

Behuizing
85%
Toetsenbord
71 / 75 → 95%
Aanwijsapparaat
94%
Aansluitmogelijkheden
51 / 70 → 73%
Gewicht
88%
Batterij
90%
Beeldscherm
82%
Gaming-performance
59 / 64 → 92%
Applicatie-performance
83 / 86 → 97%
Temperatuur
90%
Luidheid
100%
Audio
69 / 90 → 77%
Camera
71%
Gemiddelde
80%
85%
Smartphone - Gewogen Gemiddelde

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Overzichten en testrapporten over laptops en mobieltjes > Testrapporten > Kort testrapport Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro Smartphone - Krachtige gaming-smartphone met een nadeel
Marcus Herbrich, 2020-07-14 (Update: 2020-07-14)