Kort testrapport Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Smartphone
Secondary Camera: 20 MPix f/2,0, 0,9 µm
Top 10 Testrapporten
» Top 10 Multimedia Notebooks
» Top 10 Gaming-Notebooks
» Top 10 Budget Gaming Laptops
» Top 10 Lichtgewicht Gaming-Notebooks
» Top 10 Premium Office/Business-Notebooks
» Top 10 Budget Office/Business-Notebooks
» Top 10 Workstation-Laptops
» Top 10 Subnotebooks
» Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Top 10 Notebooks tot €300
» Top 10 Notebooks tot €500
» Top 10 Notebooks tot € 1.000De beste notebookbeeldschermen zoals getest door Notebookcheck
» De beste notebookbeeldschermen
» Top Windows Alternatieven voor de MacBook Pro 13
» Top Windows Alternatieven voor de MacBook Pro 15
» Top Windows alternatieven voor de MacBook 12 en Air
» Top 10 best verkopende notebooks op Amazon
» Top 10 Convertible Notebooks
» Top 10 Tablets
» Top 10 Tablets tot € 250
» Top 10 Smartphones
» Top 10 Phablets (>90cm²)
» Top 10 Camera Smartphones
» Top 10 Smartphones tot €500
» Top 10 best verkopende smartphones op Amazon
Networking | |
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10 | |
Huawei P30 Pro | |
Huawei P30 Pro | |
Xiaomi Mi 9 | |
Samsung Galaxy S10 | |
Razer Phone 2 | |
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 | |
Average of class Smartphone (5.9 - 1414, n=664) | |
Xiaomi Black Shark | |
Asus ROG Phone | |
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10 | |
Huawei P30 Pro | |
Huawei P30 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy S10 | |
Xiaomi Mi 9 | |
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 | |
Razer Phone 2 | |
Average of class Smartphone (5.59 - 1599, n=664) | |
Xiaomi Black Shark | |
Asus ROG Phone |
|
Helderheidsverdeling: 95 %
Helderheid in Batterij-modus: 409 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Zwart: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.2 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.7
ΔE Greyscale 4.8 | 0.64-98 Ø5.9
95.5% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.21
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.39 | Asus ROG Phone AMOLED, 2160x1080, 6.00 | Xiaomi Black Shark IPS, 2160x1080, 5.99 | Razer Phone 2 IGZO LCD, UltraMotion 120 Hz Display, 2560x1440, 5.72 | Samsung Galaxy S10 OLED, 3040x1440, 6.10 | Huawei P30 Pro OLED, 2340x1080, 6.47 | Xiaomi Mi 9 AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.39 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | 3% | -2% | 26% | 38% | 46% | 53% | |
Brightness middle | 409 | 597 46% | 549 34% | 600 47% | 701 71% | 597 46% | 593 45% |
Brightness | 412 | 637 55% | 541 31% | 577 40% | 705 71% | 608 48% | 587 42% |
Brightness Distribution | 95 | 83 -13% | 95 0% | 92 -3% | 98 3% | 89 -6% | 94 -1% |
Black Level * | 0.42 | 0.31 | |||||
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 * | 5.2 | 5.12 2% | 6.08 -17% | 3.43 34% | 3.7 29% | 2.2 58% | 0.9 83% |
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. * | 8.9 | 10.9 -22% | 10.69 -20% | 6.36 29% | 10.3 -16% | 3.6 60% | 2 78% |
Greyscale DeltaE2000 * | 4.8 | 7.3 -52% | 6.6 -38% | 4.4 8% | 1.4 71% | 1.6 67% | 1.5 69% |
Gamma | 2.21 100% | 2.203 100% | 2.305 95% | 2.388 92% | 2.1 105% | 2.23 99% | 2.27 97% |
CCT | 7430 87% | 7371 88% | 8399 77% | 6069 107% | 6553 99% | 6268 104% | 6548 99% |
Contrast | 1307 | 1935 |
* ... kleiner is beter
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM waargenomen | 242.7 Hz | ≤ 99 % helderheid instelling | |
Het backlight van het scherm flikkert aan 242.7 Hz (hoogstwaarschijnlijk met PWM - Pulse-Width Modulation) aan een helderheid van 99 % en lager. Boven deze helderheid zou er geen flickering / PWM mogen optreden. De frequentie van 242.7 Hz is redelijk laag en de meeste mensen die gevoelig zijn aan flickering kunnen dit dus waarnemen of geïrriteerde ogen krijgen (gebruikmakend van de vermelde helderheid en lager). Ter vergelijking: 51 % van alle geteste toestellen maakten geen gebruik van PWM om de schermhelderheid te verlagen. Als het wel werd gebruikt, werd een gemiddelde van 9693 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 142900) Hz waargenomen. |
Responstijd Scherm
↔ Responstijd Zwart naar Wit | ||
---|---|---|
4 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd | ↗ 2 ms stijging | |
↘ 2 ms daling | ||
Het scherm vertoonde erg snelle responstijden in onze tests en zou zeer geschikt moeten zijn voor snelle games. Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.8 (minimum) tot 240 (maximum) ms. » 3 % van alle toestellen zijn beter. Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd beter is dan het gemiddelde (24.3 ms) van alle geteste toestellen. | ||
↔ Responstijd 50% Grijs naar 80% Grijs | ||
4 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd | ↗ 2 ms stijging | |
↘ 2 ms daling | ||
Het scherm vertoonde erg snelle responstijden in onze tests en zou zeer geschikt moeten zijn voor snelle games. Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.8 (minimum) tot 636 (maximum) ms. » 2 % van alle toestellen zijn beter. Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd beter is dan het gemiddelde (38.5 ms) van alle geteste toestellen. |
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 | |
Compute RenderScript Score (sorteer op waarde) | |
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 | |
Asus ROG Phone | |
Xiaomi Black Shark | |
Razer Phone 2 | |
Samsung Galaxy S10 | |
Huawei P30 Pro | |
Xiaomi Mi 9 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (7372 - 8024, n=12) | |
Average of class Smartphone (663 - 21070, n=367) | |
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sorteer op waarde) | |
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 | |
Asus ROG Phone | |
Xiaomi Black Shark | |
Razer Phone 2 | |
Samsung Galaxy S10 | |
Huawei P30 Pro | |
Xiaomi Mi 9 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (10187 - 11388, n=14) | |
Average of class Smartphone (883 - 14895, n=434) | |
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sorteer op waarde) | |
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 | |
Asus ROG Phone | |
Xiaomi Black Shark | |
Razer Phone 2 | |
Samsung Galaxy S10 | |
Huawei P30 Pro | |
Xiaomi Mi 9 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (3406 - 3537, n=14) | |
Average of class Smartphone (390 - 5099, n=434) |
PCMark for Android | |
Work 2.0 performance score (sorteer op waarde) | |
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 | |
Asus ROG Phone | |
Xiaomi Black Shark | |
Razer Phone 2 | |
Samsung Galaxy S10 | |
Huawei P30 Pro | |
Xiaomi Mi 9 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (8342 - 11440, n=19) | |
Average of class Smartphone (82 - 15299, n=581) | |
Work performance score (sorteer op waarde) | |
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 | |
Asus ROG Phone | |
Razer Phone 2 | |
Samsung Galaxy S10 | |
Huawei P30 Pro | |
Xiaomi Mi 9 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (10330 - 14439, n=19) | |
Average of class Smartphone (1077 - 19989, n=729) |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sorteer op waarde) | |
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 | |
Asus ROG Phone | |
Xiaomi Black Shark | |
Razer Phone 2 | |
Samsung Galaxy S10 | |
Huawei P30 Pro | |
Xiaomi Mi 9 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (85 - 167, n=20) | |
Average of class Smartphone (0.5 - 322, n=844) | |
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sorteer op waarde) | |
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 | |
Asus ROG Phone | |
Xiaomi Black Shark | |
Razer Phone 2 | |
Samsung Galaxy S10 | |
Huawei P30 Pro | |
Xiaomi Mi 9 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (59 - 91, n=20) | |
Average of class Smartphone (1 - 142, n=853) |
GFXBench 3.0 | |
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sorteer op waarde) | |
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 | |
Asus ROG Phone | |
Xiaomi Black Shark | |
Razer Phone 2 | |
Samsung Galaxy S10 | |
Huawei P30 Pro | |
Xiaomi Mi 9 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (50 - 102, n=20) | |
Average of class Smartphone (0.8 - 180, n=749) | |
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sorteer op waarde) | |
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 | |
Asus ROG Phone | |
Xiaomi Black Shark | |
Razer Phone 2 | |
Samsung Galaxy S10 | |
Huawei P30 Pro | |
Xiaomi Mi 9 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (46 - 85, n=20) | |
Average of class Smartphone (1.2 - 119, n=757) |
GFXBench 3.1 | |
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sorteer op waarde) | |
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 | |
Asus ROG Phone | |
Xiaomi Black Shark | |
Razer Phone 2 | |
Samsung Galaxy S10 | |
Huawei P30 Pro | |
Xiaomi Mi 9 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (35 - 71, n=20) | |
Average of class Smartphone (0.87 - 117, n=612) | |
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sorteer op waarde) | |
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 | |
Asus ROG Phone | |
Xiaomi Black Shark | |
Razer Phone 2 | |
Samsung Galaxy S10 | |
Huawei P30 Pro | |
Xiaomi Mi 9 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (27 - 58, n=20) | |
Average of class Smartphone (1.2 - 110, n=614) |
Basemark GPU 1.1 | |
1920x1080 OpenGL Medium Offscreen (sorteer op waarde) | |
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 | |
Samsung Galaxy S10 | |
Huawei P30 Pro | |
Xiaomi Mi 9 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (33.1 - 37.4, n=3) | |
Average of class Smartphone (7.73 - 85.6, n=74) | |
Vulkan Medium Native (sorteer op waarde) | |
Samsung Galaxy S10 | |
Huawei P30 Pro | |
Xiaomi Mi 9 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (22.7 - 32.2, n=2) | |
Average of class Smartphone (1.57 - 63, n=64) | |
1920x1080 Vulkan Medium Offscreen (sorteer op waarde) | |
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 | |
Samsung Galaxy S10 | |
Huawei P30 Pro | |
Xiaomi Mi 9 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (24.5 - 36.3, n=3) | |
Average of class Smartphone (1.88 - 71.6, n=62) |
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sorteer op waarde) | |
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 | |
Asus ROG Phone | |
Xiaomi Black Shark | |
Razer Phone 2 | |
Samsung Galaxy S10 | |
Huawei P30 Pro | |
Xiaomi Mi 9 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (217967 - 398720, n=16) | |
Average of class Smartphone (17073 - 462516, n=297) |
VRMark - Amber Room (sorteer op waarde) | |
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 | |
Huawei P30 Pro | |
Xiaomi Mi 9 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (4486 - 4969, n=3) | |
Average of class Smartphone (119 - 7649, n=102) |
Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sorteer op waarde) | |
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 | |
Samsung Galaxy S10 | |
Huawei P30 Pro | |
Xiaomi Mi 9 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (1075 - 1425, n=4) | |
Average of class Smartphone (35 - 3575, n=150) |
Jetstream 2 - Total Score | |
Huawei P30 Pro (Chrome 73) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (45.5 - 67, n=16) | |
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73) | |
Asus ROG Phone (Chrome 74) | |
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 (Chrome 73.0.3683.90) | |
Average of class Smartphone (9.13 - 161, n=235) |
Speedometer 2.0 - Result | |
Huawei P30 Pro (Chrome 73) | |
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (42.5 - 67.9, n=15) | |
Asus ROG Phone (Chrome 74) | |
Samsung Galaxy S10 (Samsung Browser 9.0) | |
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 (Chrome 73.0.3683.90) | |
Average of class Smartphone (6.42 - 196, n=212) |
WebXPRT 3 - --- | |
Huawei P30 Pro (Chrome 73) | |
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (90 - 129, n=20) | |
Asus ROG Phone (Chrome 70) | |
Razer Phone 2 (Chrome 68) | |
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 (Chrome 73.0.3683.90) | |
Xiaomi Black Shark (Firefox 61) | |
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 194, n=306) |
Octane V2 - Total Score | |
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (17011 - 25640, n=20) | |
Huawei P30 Pro (Chrome 73) | |
Samsung Galaxy S10 (Samsung Browser 9.0) | |
Asus ROG Phone (Chrome 70) | |
Razer Phone 2 (Chrome 68) | |
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 (Chrome 73.0.3683.90) | |
Xiaomi Black Shark (Firefox 61) | |
Average of class Smartphone (894 - 58632, n=838) |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score | |
Average of class Smartphone (460 - 59466, n=864) | |
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 (Chrome 73.0.3683.90) | |
Xiaomi Black Shark (Firefox 61) | |
Razer Phone 2 (Chrome 68) | |
Asus ROG Phone (Chrome 70) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (1852 - 2611, n=19) | |
Huawei P30 Pro (Chrome 73) | |
Samsung Galaxy S10 (Samsung Browser 9.0) | |
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75) |
* ... kleiner is beter
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 | Asus ROG Phone | Xiaomi Black Shark | Razer Phone 2 | Samsung Galaxy S10 | Huawei P30 Pro | Xiaomi Mi 9 | Average 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AndroBench 3-5 | 130% | 85% | -7% | -1% | 148% | 162% | 96% | -17% | |
Random Write 4KB | 25 | 152.03 508% | 114.1 356% | 23.99 -4% | 24.44 -2% | 159.22 537% | 165.32 561% | 115 (18.2 - 290, n=74) 360% | 42 (0.14 - 319, n=953) 68% |
Random Read 4KB | 145.18 | 141.61 -2% | 127.2 -12% | 124.31 -14% | 137.4 -5% | 174.36 20% | 149.36 3% | 144 (92.6 - 239, n=74) -1% | 64.7 (1.59 - 325, n=953) -55% |
Sequential Write 256KB | 195.65 | 243.3 24% | 199.6 2% | 194.81 0% | 193.24 -1% | 250.82 28% | 388.27 98% | 250 (182 - 511, n=74) 28% | 144 (2.99 - 1321, n=953) -26% |
Sequential Read 256KB | 792.81 | 724.68 -9% | 741.5 -6% | 733.22 -8% | 831.94 5% | 849.48 7% | 666.06 -16% | 779 (427 - 999, n=74) -2% | 370 (12.1 - 2037, n=953) -53% |
PUBG Mobile
World of Tanks Blitz
Subway Surfers
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 31.1 °C / 88 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 30.1 °C / 86 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.6 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 4% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 91% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 27% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 66% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%
Asus ROG Phone audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 4% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 91% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 26% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 67% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%
Uit / Standby | ![]() ![]() |
Inactief | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Belasting |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Key:
min: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 4000 mAh | Asus ROG Phone 4000 mAh | Xiaomi Black Shark 4000 mAh | Razer Phone 2 4000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S10 3400 mAh | Huawei P30 Pro 4200 mAh | Xiaomi Mi 9 3300 mAh | Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -19% | -42% | -60% | -18% | -55% | -8% | -33% | -32% | |
Idle Minimum * | 0.73 | 0.6 18% | 0.8 -10% | 0.6 18% | 0.61 16% | 0.68 7% | 0.67 8% | 0.939 (0.58 - 1.96, n=19) -29% | 0.891 (0.2 - 3.4, n=938) -22% |
Idle Average * | 1.01 | 1.4 -39% | 1.5 -49% | 1.5 -49% | 1.27 -26% | 2.6 -157% | 1.26 -25% | 1.506 (0.85 - 2.8, n=19) -49% | 1.758 (0.6 - 6.2, n=937) -74% |
Idle Maximum * | 1.13 | 1.7 -50% | 2.3 -104% | 2.6 -130% | 1.3 -15% | 2.77 -145% | 1.29 -14% | 1.799 (1 - 2.9, n=19) -59% | 2.04 (0.74 - 6.6, n=938) -81% |
Load Average * | 3.64 | 3.8 -4% | 4.8 -32% | 7.2 -98% | 6.17 -70% | 3.74 -3% | 3.71 -2% | 4.61 (3.64 - 5.8, n=19) -27% | 4.14 (0.8 - 10.8, n=932) -14% |
Load Maximum * | 8.86 | 10.6 -20% | 10.1 -14% | 12.3 -39% | 8.55 3% | 6.82 23% | 9.3 -5% | 9.04 (7.49 - 11.9, n=19) -2% | 6.16 (1.2 - 14.2, n=932) 30% |
* ... kleiner is beter
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 4000 mAh | Asus ROG Phone 4000 mAh | Xiaomi Black Shark 4000 mAh | Razer Phone 2 4000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S10 3400 mAh | Huawei P30 Pro 4200 mAh | Xiaomi Mi 9 3300 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Batterijduur | -5% | 19% | 5% | -7% | 53% | 15% | |
Reader / Idle | 952 | 1110 17% | 1753 84% | 1630 71% | 1259 32% | 1966 107% | 1650 73% |
H.264 | 666 | 800 20% | 747 12% | 742 11% | 842 26% | 1193 79% | 1008 51% |
WiFi v1.3 | 774 | 533 -31% | 711 -8% | 531 -31% | 427 -45% | 838 8% | 546 -29% |
Load | 295 | 216 -27% | 253 -14% | 206 -30% | 170 -42% | 344 17% | 194 -34% |
Pro
Contra
Samenvatting
Voor het volledige, Engelse testrapport, klik hier.
De Xiaomi Black Shark 2 is een must voor gamers: het is op dit moment de snelste gaming-smartphone die je kunt krijgen, en het levert zulke geweldige prestaties dat het elk willekeurig Android-spel moeiteloos kan draaien op 60 FPS, zelfs bij maximale grafische instellingen. Hogere framesnelheden zijn niet mogelijk omdat het OLED-display op de Black Shark 2 slechts tot 60 Hz ondersteunt.
Naast de krachtige SoC profiteren games ook van de passieve vloeistofkoeling van Xiaomi, waardoor de smartphone zelfs tijdens lange gamesessies optimaal kan presteren, maar ook comfortabel blijft.
Als u op zoek bent naar een gaming-smartphone, is de Xiaomi Black Shark 2 momenteel de beste keuze.
De optioneel verkrijgbare controllers en het Shark Space-gamemenu zijn leuke extra's. Met Shark Space kun je de Ludicrous Modus activeren, wat een soort naverbrander is voor games - het is op dit moment echter niet nodig omdat er geen één spel te zwaar is voor de telefoon. Gamers zullen al tevreden zijn met de 8 GB/128 GB-variant, die officieel geprijsd is op €549 - echter, voor slechts €100 meer, is een model met 12 GB RAM en 256 GB opslag ook verkrijgbaar.
Wanneer je de internationale versie van de Xiaomi Black Shark 2 koopt, ontvang je Android 9 ook in het Duits en met de Google-apps al voorgeïnstalleerd. Maar het ontbreken van een microSD-slot is teleurstellend, evenals de noodzaak van een 3,5 mm audio naar USB-C adapter.
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 - 06-05-2019 v6(old)
Manuel Masiero