Notebookcheck

Kort testrapport Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Smartphone

Manuel Masiero, 👁 Daniel Schmidt, 23-05-2019

Het ultieme voor gamers? De Xiaomi Black Shark 2 gaat voor de absolute toppositie in de gaming-smartphone markt. Met de razendsnelle Snapdragon 855 SoC, passieve vloeistofkoeling, maximaal 12 GB RAM en optionele controllers lijkt dit apparaat een zeer grote kans te hebben om dit te bereiken. Onze beoordeling zal onthullen of gamers voor dit apparaat moeten kiezen.

Xiaomi Black Shark 2 (Black Shark Serie)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
Grafische kaart
Qualcomm Adreno 640
Geheugen
8192 MB 
, LPDDR4x
Beeldscherm
6.39 inch 19.5:9, 2340 x 1080 pixel 403 PPI, capacitief, AMOLED, FHD+, glimmend: ja, HDR
Opslag
128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 128 GB 
, 113.5 GB beschikbaar
Verbindingen
1 USB 2.0, Audio Verbindingen: USB-C naar 3.5mm audio-adapter, 1 Vingerafdruklezer, Brightness Sensor, Sensoren: versnellingsmeter, gyroscoop, nabijheidssensor, kompas, vingerafdruksensor, Liquid Cooling 3.0 System, RGB ighting, Camera2 API Level 3, Quick Charge 4.0, aptX, aptX HD, WiFi Display, WiFi Direct, VoLTE
Netwerkmogelijkheden
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.0, GSM (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), UMTS (850, 900, 1900, 2100 MHz), LTE (Band 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Afmetingen
hoogte x breedte x diepte (in mm): 8.77 x 163.61 x 75.01
Batterij
4000 mAh Lithium-Ion
Besturingssysteem
Android 9.0 Pie
Camera
Primary Camera: 48 MPix 48 MP (f/1,8, 1/2", 0,8 µm) + 12 MP (telefoto, f/2,2, 1,0 µm, 2x optische zoom)
Secondary Camera: 20 MPix f/2,0, 0,9 µm
Bijkomende functionaliteiten
Luidsprekers: stereo luidsprekers, Toetsenbord: virtueel, modulaire stroomadapter (Quick Charge 3.0, 5V/3A, 9V/3A, 12V/2.25A, 20V/1.35A), USB kabel (Type-A naar Type-C), USB-C-naar-3.5mm audio-adapter, SIM-Tool, doorzichtige beschermhoes, snelstartgids, JoyUI, 24 Maanden Garantie, fanless
Gewicht
205 g, Voeding: 35 g
Prijs
549 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Size comparison

163.61 mm 75.01 mm 8.77 mm 205 g161.6 mm 75.4 mm 9.3 mm 190 g158.8 mm 76.2 mm 8.3 mm 212 g158.5 mm 78.99 mm 8.5 mm 219 g158.01 mm 73.37 mm 8.41 mm 192 g157.5 mm 74.67 mm 7.61 mm 173 g149.9 mm 70.4 mm 7.8 mm 157 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Mi 9
Adreno 640, 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
678 (min: 549, max: 725) MBit/s ∼100% +16%
Huawei P30 Pro
Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
661 (min: 624, max: 683) MBit/s ∼97% +13%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Mali-G76 MP12, 9820, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
639 (min: 612, max: 683) MBit/s ∼94% +9%
Razer Phone 2
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
604 (min: 420, max: 626) MBit/s ∼89% +3%
Xiaomi Black Shark 2
Adreno 640, 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
586 (min: 267, max: 693) MBit/s ∼86%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 939, n=424)
223 MBit/s ∼33% -62%
Xiaomi Black Shark
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
116 MBit/s ∼17% -80%
Asus ROG Phone
Adreno 630, 845, 512 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
103 (min: 86, max: 109) MBit/s ∼15% -82%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Huawei P30 Pro
Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
670 (min: 542, max: 717) MBit/s ∼100% +27%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Mali-G76 MP12, 9820, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
579 (min: 558, max: 592) MBit/s ∼86% +10%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Adreno 640, 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
534 (min: 430, max: 578) MBit/s ∼80% +1%
Xiaomi Black Shark 2
Adreno 640, 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
527 (min: 410, max: 577) MBit/s ∼79%
Razer Phone 2
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
388 (min: 234, max: 484) MBit/s ∼58% -26%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 703, n=424)
213 MBit/s ∼32% -60%
Xiaomi Black Shark
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
117 MBit/s ∼17% -78%
Asus ROG Phone
Adreno 630, 845, 512 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
96.7 (min: 50, max: 106) MBit/s ∼14% -82%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø585 (267-693)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø527 (410-577)
Xiaomi Black Shark 2: Totale afstand
Xiaomi Black Shark 2: Totale afstand
Xiaomi Black Shark 2: Meer
Xiaomi Black Shark 2: Meer
Xiaomi Black Shark 2: Keerpunt
Xiaomi Black Shark 2: Keerpunt
Garmin Edge 500: Totale afstand
Garmin Edge 500: Totale afstand
Garmin Edge 500: Meer
Garmin Edge 500: Meer
Garmin Edge 500: Keerpunt
Garmin Edge 500: Keerpunt

Beeldvergelijking

Bekijk een scène en navigeer binnen het eerste beeld. Eén klik wijzigt het zoomniveau. Eén klik op het ingezoomde beeld opent het origineel in een nieuw venster. Het eerste beeld toont de verschaalde foto van het testtoestel.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
401
cd/m²
406
cd/m²
424
cd/m²
404
cd/m²
409
cd/m²
423
cd/m²
407
cd/m²
410
cd/m²
423
cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 424 cd/m² Gemiddelde: 411.9 cd/m² Minimum: 2.36 cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling: 95 %
Helderheid in Batterij-modus: 409 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Zwart: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.2 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6
ΔE Greyscale 4.8 | 0.64-98 Ø6.3
95.5% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.21
Xiaomi Black Shark 2
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.39
Asus ROG Phone
AMOLED, 2160x1080, 6
Xiaomi Black Shark
IPS, 2160x1080, 5.99
Razer Phone 2
IGZO LCD, UltraMotion 120 Hz Display, 2560x1440, 5.72
Samsung Galaxy S10
OLED, 3040x1440, 6.1
Huawei P30 Pro
OLED, 2340x1080, 6.47
Xiaomi Mi 9
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.39
Screen
3%
-2%
26%
38%
46%
53%
Brightness middle
409
597
46%
549
34%
600
47%
701
71%
597
46%
593
45%
Brightness
412
637
55%
541
31%
577
40%
705
71%
608
48%
587
42%
Brightness Distribution
95
83
-13%
95
0%
92
-3%
98
3%
89
-6%
94
-1%
Black Level *
0.42
0.31
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
5.2
5.12
2%
6.08
-17%
3.43
34%
3.7
29%
2.2
58%
0.9
83%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
8.9
10.9
-22%
10.69
-20%
6.36
29%
10.3
-16%
3.6
60%
2
78%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
4.8
7.3
-52%
6.6
-38%
4.4
8%
1.4
71%
1.6
67%
1.5
69%
Gamma
2.21 100%
2.203 100%
2.305 95%
2.388 92%
2.1 105%
2.23 99%
2.27 97%
CCT
7430 87%
7371 88%
8399 77%
6069 107%
6553 99%
6268 104%
6548 99%
Contrast
1307
1935

* ... kleiner is beter

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Om de schermhelderheid te verlagen schakelen sommige laptops het backlight erg snel aan en uit. Dit gebeurt aan een dergelijk hoge frequentie dat het niet zichtbaar is voor het menselijk oog. Als de frequentie te laag is kunnen personen met gevoelige ogen geïrriteerd geraken, hoofdpijn krijgen en zelfs flickering waarnemen.
Screen flickering / PWM waargenomen 242.7 Hz ≤ 99 % helderheid instelling

Het backlight van het scherm flikkert aan 242.7 Hz (hoogstwaarschijnlijk met PWM - Pulse-Width Modulation) aan een helderheid van 99 % en lager. Boven deze helderheid zou er geen flickering / PWM mogen optreden.

De frequentie van 242.7 Hz is redelijk laag en de meeste mensen die gevoelig zijn aan flickering kunnen dit dus waarnemen of geïrriteerde ogen krijgen (gebruikmakend van de vermelde helderheid en lager).

Ter vergelijking: 51 % van alle geteste toestellen maakten geen gebruik van PWM om de schermhelderheid te verlagen. Als het wel werd gebruikt, werd een gemiddelde van 9367 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz waargenomen.

Responstijd Scherm

De responstijden van het scherm tonen hoe snel het scherm in staat is om van één kleur naar de andere te veranderen. Trage responstijden kunnen aanleiding geven tot 'nabeelden' rond bewegende objecten of het scherm wazig maken (blur). Vooral spelers van snelle 3D-games hebben baat bij een scherm met snelle responstijden.
       Responstijd Zwart naar Wit
4 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd↗ 2 ms stijging
↘ 2 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde erg snelle responstijden in onze tests en zou zeer geschikt moeten zijn voor snelle games.
Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.8 (minimum) tot 240 (maximum) ms. » 2 % van alle toestellen zijn beter.
Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd beter is dan het gemiddelde (25 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.
       Responstijd 50% Grijs naar 80% Grijs
4 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd↗ 2 ms stijging
↘ 2 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde erg snelle responstijden in onze tests en zou zeer geschikt moeten zijn voor snelle games.
Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.9 (minimum) tot 636 (maximum) ms. » 1 % van alle toestellen zijn beter.
Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd beter is dan het gemiddelde (39.8 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.
Geekbench 4.4
Compute RenderScript Score (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Black Shark 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
7936 Points ∼55%
Asus ROG Phone
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
14489 Points ∼100% +83%
Xiaomi Black Shark
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
13620 Points ∼94% +72%
Razer Phone 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
13896 Points ∼96% +75%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
10128 Points ∼70% +28%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
8574 Points ∼59% +8%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7482 Points ∼52% -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (7372 - 8024, n=10)
7597 Points ∼52% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (663 - 21070, n=322)
4603 Points ∼32% -42%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Black Shark 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
11359 Points ∼100%
Asus ROG Phone
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
9231 Points ∼81% -19%
Xiaomi Black Shark
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
8453 Points ∼74% -26%
Razer Phone 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
9018 Points ∼79% -21%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
10162 Points ∼89% -11%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
9880 Points ∼87% -13%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
10999 Points ∼97% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (10187 - 11388, n=12)
10936 Points ∼96% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3240 - 11598, n=381)
4621 Points ∼41% -59%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Black Shark 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
3537 Points ∼79%
Asus ROG Phone
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
2500 Points ∼56% -29%
Xiaomi Black Shark
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2437 Points ∼54% -31%
Razer Phone 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
2409 Points ∼54% -32%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4499 Points ∼100% +27%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
3306 Points ∼73% -7%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3523 Points ∼78% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (3406 - 3537, n=12)
3482 Points ∼77% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (903 - 4824, n=383)
1387 Points ∼31% -61%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Black Shark 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
8342 Points ∼87%
Asus ROG Phone
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
9430 Points ∼99% +13%
Xiaomi Black Shark
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
8309 Points ∼87% 0%
Razer Phone 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
8701 Points ∼91% +4%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
7595 Points ∼79% -9%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
9135 Points ∼96% +10%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9035 Points ∼95% +8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (8342 - 11440, n=11)
9555 Points ∼100% +15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3227 - 11440, n=378)
5073 Points ∼53% -39%
Work performance score (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Black Shark 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
10330 Points ∼79%
Asus ROG Phone
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
9707 Points ∼75% -6%
Razer Phone 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
10006 Points ∼77% -3%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
9750 Points ∼75% -6%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
12996 Points ∼100% +26%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
10985 Points ∼85% +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (10330 - 14439, n=11)
12008 Points ∼92% +16%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4096 - 14439, n=546)
5569 Points ∼43% -46%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Black Shark 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
3365 Points ∼100%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
3183 Points ∼95% -5%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3288 Points ∼98% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (2104 - 3365, n=11)
2979 Points ∼89% -11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2051 - 15735, n=61)
2372 Points ∼70% -30%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Black Shark 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
5768 Points ∼100%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
4688 Points ∼81% -19%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5723 Points ∼99% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (4236 - 5862, n=11)
5548 Points ∼96% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (341 - 14536, n=61)
2389 Points ∼41% -59%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Black Shark 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
4978 Points ∼100%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
4242 Points ∼85% -15%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4914 Points ∼99% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (3800 - 5012, n=11)
4640 Points ∼93% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (419 - 14786, n=64)
2076 Points ∼42% -58%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Black Shark 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
4535 Points ∼100%
Asus ROG Phone
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
3040 Points ∼67% -33%
Xiaomi Black Shark
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3577 Points ∼79% -21%
Razer Phone 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
3540 Points ∼78% -22%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
2981 Points ∼66% -34%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
4171 Points ∼92% -8%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3754 Points ∼83% -17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (1934 - 4535, n=11)
3733 Points ∼82% -18%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 4535, n=392)
1844 Points ∼41% -59%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Black Shark 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
7108 Points ∼100%
Asus ROG Phone
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
5673 Points ∼80% -20%
Xiaomi Black Shark
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
5770 Points ∼81% -19%
Razer Phone 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
5825 Points ∼82% -18%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
5358 Points ∼75% -25%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
4361 Points ∼61% -39%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7076 Points ∼100% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (5184 - 7115, n=11)
6745 Points ∼95% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (76 - 8206, n=392)
1619 Points ∼23% -77%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Black Shark 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
6312 Points ∼100%
Asus ROG Phone
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
4757 Points ∼75% -25%
Xiaomi Black Shark
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
5078 Points ∼80% -20%
Razer Phone 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
5094 Points ∼81% -19%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4551 Points ∼72% -28%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
4317 Points ∼68% -32%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5913 Points ∼94% -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (3969 - 6312, n=11)
5675 Points ∼90% -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (94 - 6312, n=395)
1504 Points ∼24% -76%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Black Shark 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
4462 Points ∼100%
Asus ROG Phone
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
3763 Points ∼84% -16%
Xiaomi Black Shark
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3570 Points ∼80% -20%
Razer Phone 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
3532 Points ∼79% -21%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
4164 Points ∼93% -7%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3788 Points ∼85% -15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (2345 - 4703, n=10)
3878 Points ∼87% -13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 4703, n=407)
1821 Points ∼41% -59%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Black Shark 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
10300 Points ∼100%
Asus ROG Phone
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
8345 Points ∼81% -19%
Xiaomi Black Shark
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
8451 Points ∼82% -18%
Razer Phone 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
8389 Points ∼81% -19%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
5767 Points ∼56% -44%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
10291 Points ∼100% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (6358 - 10420, n=10)
9416 Points ∼91% -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (131 - 14951, n=407)
2194 Points ∼21% -79%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Black Shark 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
7980 Points ∼100%
Asus ROG Phone
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
6568 Points ∼82% -18%
Xiaomi Black Shark
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
6482 Points ∼81% -19%
Razer Phone 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
6425 Points ∼81% -19%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
5313 Points ∼67% -33%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7449 Points ∼93% -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (5268 - 8141, n=10)
7099 Points ∼89% -11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (159 - 8141, n=408)
1872 Points ∼23% -77%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Black Shark 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
4262 Points ∼100%
Asus ROG Phone
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
3637 Points ∼85% -15%
Xiaomi Black Shark
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3408 Points ∼80% -20%
Razer Phone 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
3557 Points ∼83% -17%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
2854 Points ∼67% -33%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
3849 Points ∼90% -10%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3758 Points ∼88% -12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (2705 - 4320, n=11)
3756 Points ∼88% -12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (486 - 4320, n=468)
1781 Points ∼42% -58%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Black Shark 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
6362 Points ∼100%
Asus ROG Phone
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
5174 Points ∼81% -19%
Xiaomi Black Shark
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
5220 Points ∼82% -18%
Razer Phone 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
5113 Points ∼80% -20%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
5176 Points ∼81% -19%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
4400 Points ∼69% -31%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
6355 Points ∼100% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (5663 - 6362, n=11)
6235 Points ∼98% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (65 - 6362, n=470)
1350 Points ∼21% -79%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Black Shark 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
5734 Points ∼100%
Asus ROG Phone
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
4730 Points ∼82% -18%
Xiaomi Black Shark
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
4668 Points ∼81% -19%
Razer Phone 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
4660 Points ∼81% -19%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4383 Points ∼76% -24%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
4264 Points ∼74% -26%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5509 Points ∼96% -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (4556 - 5734, n=11)
5418 Points ∼94% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (80 - 5734, n=478)
1286 Points ∼22% -78%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Black Shark 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
4240 Points ∼100%
Asus ROG Phone
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
3668 Points ∼87% -13%
Xiaomi Black Shark
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3443 Points ∼81% -19%
Razer Phone 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
3587 Points ∼85% -15%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
3828 Points ∼90% -10%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3614 Points ∼85% -15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (3505 - 4454, n=10)
3910 Points ∼92% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (512 - 4454, n=501)
1691 Points ∼40% -60%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Black Shark 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
9983 Points ∼100%
Asus ROG Phone
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
8243 Points ∼83% -17%
Xiaomi Black Shark
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
8312 Points ∼83% -17%
Razer Phone 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
8006 Points ∼80% -20%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
5431 Points ∼54% -46%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9963 Points ∼100% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (6122 - 10008, n=10)
9125 Points ∼91% -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 10008, n=501)
1815 Points ∼18% -82%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Black Shark 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
7673 Points ∼100%
Asus ROG Phone
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
6454 Points ∼84% -16%
Xiaomi Black Shark
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
6324 Points ∼82% -18%
Razer Phone 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
6285 Points ∼82% -18%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
4969 Points ∼65% -35%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7166 Points ∼93% -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (5251 - 7820, n=10)
7026 Points ∼92% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 7820, n=509)
1562 Points ∼20% -80%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Black Shark 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
45072 Points ∼100%
Asus ROG Phone
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
37475 Points ∼83% -17%
Xiaomi Black Shark
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
31384 Points ∼70% -30%
Razer Phone 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
35578 Points ∼79% -21%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
31297 Points ∼69% -31%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
31483 Points ∼70% -30%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
25339 Points ∼56% -44%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (23877 - 45072, n=10)
31426 Points ∼70% -30%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4811 - 45072, n=659)
13790 Points ∼31% -69%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Black Shark 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
110432 Points ∼100%
Asus ROG Phone
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
80283 Points ∼73% -27%
Xiaomi Black Shark
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
82423 Points ∼75% -25%
Razer Phone 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
80333 Points ∼73% -27%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
71292 Points ∼65% -35%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
63469 Points ∼57% -43%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
106534 Points ∼96% -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (103955 - 110432, n=10)
95143 Points ∼86% -14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7567 - 162695, n=659)
20320 Points ∼18% -82%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Black Shark 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
83518 Points ∼100%
Asus ROG Phone
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
64029 Points ∼77% -23%
Xiaomi Black Shark
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
60543 Points ∼72% -28%
Razer Phone 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
62783 Points ∼75% -25%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
55524 Points ∼66% -34%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
51779 Points ∼62% -38%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
62225 Points ∼75% -25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (63969 - 83518, n=10)
61470 Points ∼74% -26%
Average of class Smartphone
  (8316 - 83518, n=660)
16844 Points ∼20% -80%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Black Shark 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
167 fps ∼100%
Asus ROG Phone
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
150 fps ∼90% -10%
Xiaomi Black Shark
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
151 fps ∼90% -10%
Razer Phone 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
152 fps ∼91% -9%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
143 fps ∼86% -14%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
138 fps ∼83% -17%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
167 fps ∼100% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (85 - 167, n=12)
160 fps ∼96% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (6 - 251, n=689)
35.3 fps ∼21% -79%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Black Shark 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
60 fps ∼67%
Asus ROG Phone
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
89 fps ∼100% +48%
Xiaomi Black Shark
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
60 fps ∼67% 0%
Razer Phone 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
89 fps ∼100% +48%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
60 fps ∼67% 0%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
60 fps ∼67% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
60 fps ∼67% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (59 - 91, n=12)
63.3 fps ∼71% +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.8 - 120, n=692)
27.3 fps ∼31% -54%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Black Shark 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
102 fps ∼100%
Asus ROG Phone
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
83 fps ∼81% -19%
Xiaomi Black Shark
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
82 fps ∼80% -20%
Razer Phone 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
83 fps ∼81% -19%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
85 fps ∼83% -17%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
91 fps ∼89% -11%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
100 fps ∼98% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (50 - 102, n=12)
95 fps ∼93% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.7 - 132, n=608)
19.6 fps ∼19% -81%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Black Shark 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
60 fps ∼80%
Asus ROG Phone
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
75 fps ∼100% +25%
Xiaomi Black Shark
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
59 fps ∼79% -2%
Razer Phone 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
56 fps ∼75% -7%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
53 fps ∼71% -12%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
59 fps ∼79% -2%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
60 fps ∼80% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (51 - 85, n=12)
60.5 fps ∼81% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.4 - 115, n=613)
18.1 fps ∼24% -70%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Black Shark 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
71 fps ∼100%
Asus ROG Phone
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
60 fps ∼85% -15%
Xiaomi Black Shark
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
60 fps ∼85% -15%
Razer Phone 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
61 fps ∼86% -14%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
53 fps ∼75% -25%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
56 fps ∼79% -21%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
69 fps ∼97% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (35 - 71, n=12)
62.5 fps ∼88% -12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.6 - 88, n=469)
16.1 fps ∼23% -77%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Black Shark 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
57 fps ∼98%
Asus ROG Phone
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
54 fps ∼93% -5%
Xiaomi Black Shark
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
53 fps ∼91% -7%
Razer Phone 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
37 fps ∼64% -35%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
30 fps ∼52% -47%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
47 fps ∼81% -18%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
58 fps ∼100% +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (36 - 58, n=12)
49.2 fps ∼85% -14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.4 - 110, n=472)
15.4 fps ∼27% -73%
GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Black Shark 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
25 fps ∼100%
Asus ROG Phone
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
21 fps ∼84% -16%
Razer Phone 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
15 fps ∼60% -40%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
16 fps ∼64% -36%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
20 fps ∼80% -20%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
24 fps ∼96% -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (14 - 26, n=11)
21.5 fps ∼86% -14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.86 - 59, n=172)
8.99 fps ∼36% -64%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Black Shark 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
17 fps ∼100%
Asus ROG Phone
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
14 fps ∼82% -18%
Razer Phone 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
14 fps ∼82% -18%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
17 fps ∼100% 0%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
14 fps ∼82% -18%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
16 fps ∼94% -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (8.5 - 24, n=12)
16.9 fps ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.26 - 31, n=172)
6.24 fps ∼37% -63%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Black Shark 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
38 fps ∼100%
Asus ROG Phone
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
34 fps ∼89% -11%
Razer Phone 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
23 fps ∼61% -39%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
25 fps ∼66% -34%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
32 fps ∼84% -16%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
37 fps ∼97% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (22 - 38, n=11)
34.2 fps ∼90% -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.8 - 59, n=173)
13.6 fps ∼36% -64%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Black Shark 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
43 fps ∼98%
Asus ROG Phone
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
37 fps ∼84% -14%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
44 fps ∼100% +2%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
36 fps ∼82% -16%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
41 fps ∼93% -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (22 - 43, n=12)
40.3 fps ∼92% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.94 - 63, n=173)
14.9 fps ∼34% -65%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Black Shark 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
42 fps ∼100%
Asus ROG Phone
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
35 fps ∼83% -17%
Xiaomi Black Shark
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
35 fps ∼83% -17%
Razer Phone 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
35 fps ∼83% -17%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
35 fps ∼83% -17%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
33 fps ∼79% -21%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
42 fps ∼100% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (22 - 42, n=12)
39.8 fps ∼95% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.89 - 54, n=398)
10.7 fps ∼25% -75%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Black Shark 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
36 fps ∼95%
Asus ROG Phone
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
31 fps ∼82% -14%
Xiaomi Black Shark
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
31 fps ∼82% -14%
Razer Phone 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
22 fps ∼58% -39%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
23 fps ∼61% -36%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
27 fps ∼71% -25%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
38 fps ∼100% +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (21 - 41, n=12)
32.9 fps ∼87% -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.6 - 58, n=402)
9.74 fps ∼26% -73%
Basemark GPU
1920x1080 OpenGL Medium Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Black Shark 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
33.05 fps ∼88%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
33.04 (min: 9.22, max: 75.78) fps ∼88% 0%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
27.02 (min: 2.8, max: 80.83) fps ∼72% -18%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
37.41 fps ∼100% +13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (33.1 - 37.4, n=3)
35.9 fps ∼96% +9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.53 - 37.4, n=64)
15.6 fps ∼42% -53%
Vulkan Medium Native (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
27.16 (min: 8.36, max: 61.33) fps ∼84%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
28.46 (min: 9.24, max: 54.37) fps ∼88%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
32.2 fps ∼100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (22.7 - 32.2, n=2)
27.5 fps ∼85%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.91 - 37.3, n=59)
12.7 fps ∼39%
1920x1080 Vulkan Medium Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Black Shark 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
24.54 fps ∼64%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
38.35 (min: 8.77, max: 77.53) fps ∼100% +56%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
30.67 (min: 5.93, max: 132.19) fps ∼80% +25%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
35.63 fps ∼93% +45%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (24.5 - 36.3, n=3)
32.2 fps ∼84% +31%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.2 - 39.7, n=58)
15.1 fps ∼39% -38%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Black Shark 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
371562 Points ∼99%
Asus ROG Phone
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
299878 Points ∼80% -19%
Xiaomi Black Shark
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
290397 Points ∼77% -22%
Razer Phone 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
285952 Points ∼76% -23%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
328111 Points ∼88% -12%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
316199 Points ∼84% -15%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
374820 Points ∼100% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (217967 - 398720, n=12)
353615 Points ∼94% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (52607 - 398720, n=291)
133058 Points ∼35% -64%
VRMark - Amber Room (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Black Shark 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
4486 Score ∼89%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
5020 Score ∼100% +12%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4964 Score ∼99% +11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (4486 - 4969, n=3)
4806 Score ∼96% +7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (552 - 5025, n=61)
1999 Score ∼40% -55%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Black Shark 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
1264 Points ∼90%
Asus ROG Phone
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
1336 Points ∼95% +6%
Xiaomi Black Shark
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
1243 Points ∼88% -2%
Razer Phone 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
1226 Points ∼87% -3%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
1385 Points ∼98% +10%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
1409 Points ∼100% +11%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
1378 Points ∼98% +9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (1076 - 1431, n=11)
1321 Points ∼94% +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7 - 1731, n=621)
751 Points ∼53% -41%
Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Black Shark 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
8125 Points ∼88%
Asus ROG Phone
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
7957 Points ∼86% -2%
Xiaomi Black Shark
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
5846 Points ∼63% -28%
Razer Phone 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
8001 Points ∼86% -2%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
7361 Points ∼79% -9%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
7758 Points ∼84% -5%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9270 Points ∼100% +14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (8125 - 9477, n=11)
9109 Points ∼98% +12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (18 - 15969, n=621)
1986 Points ∼21% -76%
Memory (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Black Shark 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
3560 Points ∼67%
Asus ROG Phone
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
5296 Points ∼100% +49%
Xiaomi Black Shark
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2871 Points ∼54% -19%
Razer Phone 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
3906 Points ∼74% +10%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4570 Points ∼86% +28%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
5210 Points ∼98% +46%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4031 Points ∼76% +13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (2661 - 7500, n=11)
4976 Points ∼94% +40%
Average of class Smartphone
  (21 - 7500, n=621)
1487 Points ∼28% -58%
System (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Black Shark 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
5993 Points ∼70%
Asus ROG Phone
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
8613 Points ∼100% +44%
Xiaomi Black Shark
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
7105 Points ∼82% +19%
Razer Phone 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
8120 Points ∼94% +35%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
7476 Points ∼87% +25%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
8572 Points ∼100% +43%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
8441 Points ∼98% +41%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (5993 - 9143, n=11)
8480 Points ∼98% +41%
Average of class Smartphone
  (369 - 12202, n=621)
2910 Points ∼34% -51%
Overall (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Black Shark 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
3847 Points ∼82%
Asus ROG Phone
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
4693 Points ∼100% +22%
Xiaomi Black Shark
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3489 Points ∼74% -9%
Razer Phone 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
4200 Points ∼89% +9%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4320 Points ∼92% +12%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
4701 Points ∼100% +22%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4595 Points ∼97% +19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (3847 - 5397, n=11)
4716 Points ∼100% +23%
Average of class Smartphone
  (150 - 6097, n=625)
1450 Points ∼31% -62%
Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Black Shark 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
1075 Points ∼56%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
1927 Points ∼100% +79%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
1627 Points ∼84% +51%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
1415 Points ∼73% +32%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (1075 - 1425, n=4)
1334 Points ∼69% +24%
Average of class Smartphone
  (35 - 2754, n=104)
716 Points ∼37% -33%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Huawei P30 Pro (Chrome 73)
60.469 Points ∼100% +33%
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73)
57.207 Points ∼95% +26%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (45.5 - 63.1, n=10)
57.1 Points ∼94% +25%
Asus ROG Phone (Chrome 74)
48.929 Points ∼81% +7%
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 (Chrome 73.0.3683.90)
45.538 Points ∼75%
Average of class Smartphone (12.9 - 108, n=97)
30.9 Points ∼51% -32%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Huawei P30 Pro (Chrome 73)
67.8 runs/min ∼100% +45%
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75)
65.7 runs/min ∼97% +41%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (42.5 - 67.9, n=9)
60.6 runs/min ∼89% +30%
Asus ROG Phone (Chrome 74)
54.1 runs/min ∼80% +16%
Samsung Galaxy S10 (Samsung Browser 9.0)
54 runs/min ∼80% +16%
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 (Chrome 73.0.3683.90)
46.7 runs/min ∼69%
Average of class Smartphone (59.7 - 123, n=85)
34.4 runs/min ∼51% -26%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Huawei P30 Pro (Chrome 73)
122 Points ∼100% +30%
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75)
108 Points ∼89% +15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (94 - 114, n=12)
106 Points ∼87% +13%
Asus ROG Phone (Chrome 70)
103 Points ∼84% +10%
Razer Phone 2 (Chrome 68)
96 Points ∼79% +2%
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 (Chrome 73.0.3683.90)
94 Points ∼77%
Xiaomi Black Shark (Firefox 61)
90 Points ∼74% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 161, n=151)
63.4 Points ∼52% -33%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75)
24534 Points ∼100% +44%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (17011 - 25640, n=12)
22912 Points ∼93% +35%
Huawei P30 Pro (Chrome 73)
22447 Points ∼91% +32%
Samsung Galaxy S10 (Samsung Browser 9.0)
20286 Points ∼83% +19%
Asus ROG Phone (Chrome 70)
18275 Points ∼74% +7%
Razer Phone 2 (Chrome 68)
17067 Points ∼70% 0%
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 (Chrome 73.0.3683.90)
17011 Points ∼69%
Xiaomi Black Shark (Firefox 61)
13663 Points ∼56% -20%
Average of class Smartphone (1994 - 43280, n=682)
6403 Points ∼26% -62%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (603 - 59466, n=702)
10678 ms * ∼100% -322%
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 (Chrome 73.0.3683.90)
2528.6 ms * ∼24%
Xiaomi Black Shark (Firefox 61)
2287 ms * ∼21% +10%
Razer Phone 2 (Chrome 68)
2282.6 ms * ∼21% +10%
Asus ROG Phone (Chrome 70)
2154 ms * ∼20% +15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (1852 - 2611, n=11)
2141 ms * ∼20% +15%
Huawei P30 Pro (Chrome 73)
2009.1 ms * ∼19% +21%
Samsung Galaxy S10 (Samsung Browser 9.0)
1924.2 ms * ∼18% +24%
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75)
1873.2 ms * ∼18% +26%

* ... kleiner is beter

Xiaomi Black Shark 2Asus ROG PhoneXiaomi Black SharkRazer Phone 2Samsung Galaxy S10Huawei P30 ProXiaomi Mi 9Average 128 GB UFS 2.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
130%
85%
-7%
-1%
148%
162%
61%
-50%
Random Write 4KB
25
152.03
508%
114.1
356%
23.99
-4%
24.44
-2%
159.22
537%
165.32
561%
86.8 (18.2 - 250, n=39)
247%
21.3 (0.14 - 250, n=730)
-15%
Random Read 4KB
145.18
141.61
-2%
127.2
-12%
124.31
-14%
137.4
-5%
174.36
20%
149.36
3%
139 (98.9 - 158, n=39)
-4%
46.1 (1.59 - 196, n=730)
-68%
Sequential Write 256KB
195.65
243.3
24%
199.6
2%
194.81
0%
193.24
-1%
250.82
28%
388.27
98%
205 (182 - 503, n=39)
5%
94.6 (2.99 - 590, n=730)
-52%
Sequential Read 256KB
792.81
724.68
-9%
741.5
-6%
733.22
-8%
831.94
5%
849.48
7%
666.06
-16%
751 (427 - 912, n=39)
-5%
266 (12.1 - 1504, n=730)
-66%
PUBG Mobile
010203040Tooltip
; 0.12.0: Ø29.9 (28-31)
World of Tanks Blitz
010203040506070Tooltip
; 5.10.0.372: Ø59.5 (23-61)
Subway Surfers
010203040506070Tooltip
; 1.102.0: Ø59.3 (5-61)
Max. Belasting
 30.8 °C31.1 °C30.7 °C 
 30.8 °C30.2 °C30.8 °C 
 30.6 °C30.1 °C29.5 °C 
Maximum: 31.1 °C
Gemiddelde: 30.5 °C
29 °C29 °C29.5 °C
28.8 °C29.2 °C30.1 °C
28.8 °C29.1 °C30.1 °C
Maximum: 30.1 °C
Gemiddelde: 29.3 °C
Stroomadapter (max.)  26.9 °C | Kamertemperatuur 22 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 30.5 °C / 87 F, compared to the average of 33.1 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 31.1 °C / 88 F, compared to the average of 35.5 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 30.1 °C / 86 F, compared to the average of 34.1 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.6 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 33.1 °C / 92 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2032.537.62531.928.13122.3244021.727.65029.230.96326.727.28020.329.410020.523.81252325.616015.643.120017.846.525016.353.931515.460.240015.965.150015.866.163013.367.580014.165.6100014.165.212501470.4160013.568.4200013.467.7250013.968.7315014.270.8400013.969500014.661.8630014.260.3800014.763.3100001562.11250014.956.91600015.357.2SPL26.479.4N0.845.6median 14.7median 63.3Delta0.97.130.328.938.129.628.530.331.433.236.632.724.625.524.124.920.524.91926.316.936.419.149.716.652.613.957.11563.514.662.712.35911.862.611.866.911.969.311.46811.270.411.570.211.371.310.96610.561.810.761.710.665.310.567.810.66710.65459.260.264.357.22479.612.514.116.810.40.544.8median 11.8median 62.72.27.9hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseXiaomi Black Shark 2Asus ROG Phone
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 26% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 68% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Asus ROG Phone audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 24% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 69% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Stroomgebruik
Uit / Standbydarklight 0.02 / 0.26 Watt
Inactiefdarkmidlight 0.73 / 1.01 / 1.13 Watt
Belasting midlight 3.64 / 8.86 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Xiaomi Black Shark 2
4000 mAh
Asus ROG Phone
4000 mAh
Xiaomi Black Shark
4000 mAh
Razer Phone 2
4000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S10
3400 mAh
Huawei P30 Pro
4200 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 9
3300 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-19%
-42%
-60%
-18%
-55%
-8%
-33%
-30%
Idle Minimum *
0.73
0.6
18%
0.8
-10%
0.6
18%
0.61
16%
0.68
7%
0.67
8%
0.897 (0.6 - 1.3, n=11)
-23%
0.878 (0.2 - 3.4, n=757)
-20%
Idle Average *
1.01
1.4
-39%
1.5
-49%
1.5
-49%
1.27
-26%
2.6
-157%
1.26
-25%
1.505 (1 - 2.35, n=11)
-49%
1.733 (0.6 - 6.2, n=756)
-72%
Idle Maximum *
1.13
1.7
-50%
2.3
-104%
2.6
-130%
1.3
-15%
2.77
-145%
1.29
-14%
1.875 (1.13 - 2.9, n=11)
-66%
2.02 (0.74 - 6.6, n=757)
-79%
Load Average *
3.64
3.8
-4%
4.8
-32%
7.2
-98%
6.17
-70%
3.74
-3%
3.71
-2%
4.61 (3.64 - 5.8, n=11)
-27%
4.07 (0.8 - 10.8, n=751)
-12%
Load Maximum *
8.86
10.6
-20%
10.1
-14%
12.3
-39%
8.55
3%
6.82
23%
9.3
-5%
8.87 (7.49 - 10.2, n=11)
-0%
5.9 (1.2 - 14.2, n=751)
33%

* ... kleiner is beter

Batterijduur
Inactief (zonder WLAN, minimale helderheid)
15h 52min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
12h 54min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
11h 06min
Belast (maximale helderheid)
4h 55min
Xiaomi Black Shark 2
4000 mAh
Asus ROG Phone
4000 mAh
Xiaomi Black Shark
4000 mAh
Razer Phone 2
4000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S10
3400 mAh
Huawei P30 Pro
4200 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 9
3300 mAh
Batterijduur
-5%
19%
5%
-7%
53%
15%
Reader / Idle
952
1110
17%
1753
84%
1630
71%
1259
32%
1966
107%
1650
73%
H.264
666
800
20%
747
12%
742
11%
842
26%
1193
79%
1008
51%
WiFi v1.3
774
533
-31%
711
-8%
531
-31%
427
-45%
838
8%
546
-29%
Load
295
216
-27%
253
-14%
206
-30%
170
-42%
344
17%
194
-34%

Pro

+ extreem snelle SoC
+ uitstekende gaming prestaties
+ snelle Wi-Fi
+ dual-SIM en VoLTE
+ premium, zeer stabiele behuizing
+ helder AMOLED-beeldscherm met grote kleurruimte
+ goede camera's bij daglicht
+ blijft erg koel onder belasting

Contra

- geen IP-certificering
- geen microSD-slot
- heeft een adapter nodig voor een 3,5 mm audio-aansluiting
- gemiddelde batterijlevensduur
- geen draadloos opladen
- geen NFC

Samenvatting

Getset: Xiaomi Black Shark 2. Testmodel geleverd door:
Getset: Xiaomi Black Shark 2. Testmodel geleverd door:

Voor het volledige, Engelse testrapport, klik hier.

De Xiaomi Black Shark 2 is een must voor gamers: het is op dit moment de snelste gaming-smartphone die je kunt krijgen, en het levert zulke geweldige prestaties dat het elk willekeurig Android-spel moeiteloos kan draaien op 60 FPS, zelfs bij maximale grafische instellingen. Hogere framesnelheden zijn niet mogelijk omdat het OLED-display op de Black Shark 2 slechts tot 60 Hz ondersteunt.

Naast de krachtige SoC profiteren games ook van de passieve vloeistofkoeling van Xiaomi, waardoor de smartphone zelfs tijdens lange gamesessies optimaal kan presteren, maar ook comfortabel blijft.

Als u op zoek bent naar een gaming-smartphone, is de Xiaomi Black Shark 2 momenteel de beste keuze.

De optioneel verkrijgbare controllers en het Shark Space-gamemenu zijn leuke extra's. Met Shark Space kun je de Ludicrous Modus activeren, wat een soort naverbrander is voor games - het is op dit moment echter niet nodig omdat er geen één spel te zwaar is voor de telefoon. Gamers zullen al tevreden zijn met de 8 GB/128 GB-variant, die officieel geprijsd is op €549 - echter, voor slechts €100 meer, is een model met 12 GB RAM en 256 GB opslag ook verkrijgbaar.

Wanneer je de internationale versie van de Xiaomi Black Shark 2 koopt, ontvang je Android 9 ook in het Duits en met de Google-apps al voorgeïnstalleerd. Maar het ontbreken van een microSD-slot is teleurstellend, evenals de noodzaak van een 3,5 mm audio naar USB-C adapter.

Xiaomi Black Shark 2 - 06-05-2019 v6(old)
Manuel Masiero

Behuizing
88%
Toetsenbord
67 / 75 → 89%
Aanwijsapparaat
93%
Aansluitmogelijkheden
44 / 60 → 74%
Gewicht
88%
Batterij
94%
Beeldscherm
83%
Gaming-performance
73 / 63 → 100%
Applicatie-performance
79 / 70 → 100%
Temperatuur
94%
Luidheid
100%
Audio
75 / 91 → 82%
Camera
77%
Gemiddelde
81%
87%
Smartphone - Gewogen Gemiddelde

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Overzichten en testrapporten over laptops en mobieltjes > Testrapporten > Kort testrapport Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Smartphone
Manuel Masiero, 2019-05-23 (Update: 2019-05-23)