Kort testrapport Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Smartphone

Manuel Masiero, 👁 Daniel Schmidt, 23-05-2019

Het ultieme voor gamers? De Xiaomi Black Shark 2 gaat voor de absolute toppositie in de gaming-smartphone markt. Met de razendsnelle Snapdragon 855 SoC, passieve vloeistofkoeling, maximaal 12 GB RAM en optionele controllers lijkt dit apparaat een zeer grote kans te hebben om dit te bereiken. Onze beoordeling zal onthullen of gamers voor dit apparaat moeten kiezen.

Testtoestel voorzien door TradingShenzhen

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Xiaomi Black Shark 2 (Black Shark Serie)

Processor

Qualcomm Snapdragon 855

Grafische kaart

Qualcomm Adreno 640

Geheugen

8192 MB

, LPDDR4x

Beeldscherm

6.39 inch 19.5:9, 2340 x 1080 pixel 403 PPI, capacitief, AMOLED, FHD+, glimmend: ja, HDR

Opslag

128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 128 GB

, 113.5 GB beschikbaar

Verbindingen

1 USB 2.0, Audio Verbindingen: USB-C naar 3.5mm audio-adapter, 1 Vingerafdruklezer, Brightness Sensor, Sensoren: versnellingsmeter, gyroscoop, nabijheidssensor, kompas, vingerafdruksensor, Liquid Cooling 3.0 System, RGB ighting, Camera2 API Level 3, Quick Charge 4.0, aptX, aptX HD, WiFi Display, WiFi Direct, VoLTE

Netwerkmogelijkheden

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 5.0, GSM (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), UMTS (850, 900, 1900, 2100 MHz), LTE (Band 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS

Afmetingen

hoogte x breedte x diepte (in mm): 8.77 x 163.61 x 75.01

Batterij

4000 mAh Lithium-Ion

Besturingssysteem

Android 9.0 Pie

Camera

Primary Camera: 48 MPix 48 MP (f/1,8, 1/2", 0,8 µm) + 12 MP (telefoto, f/2,2, 1,0 µm, 2x optische zoom)
Secondary Camera: 20 MPix f/2,0, 0,9 µm

Bijkomende functionaliteiten

Luidsprekers: stereo luidsprekers, Toetsenbord: virtueel, modulaire stroomadapter (Quick Charge 3.0, 5V/3A, 9V/3A, 12V/2.25A, 20V/1.35A), USB kabel (Type-A naar Type-C), USB-C-naar-3.5mm audio-adapter, SIM-Tool, doorzichtige beschermhoes, snelstartgids, JoyUI, 24 Maanden Garantie, fanless

Gewicht

205 g, Voeding: 35 g

Prijs

549 Euro

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

zie alle specificaties

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Mi 9 Adreno 640, 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	678 (min: 549, max: 725) MBit/s ∼100% +16%
Huawei P30 Pro Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	661 (min: 624, max: 683) MBit/s ∼97% +13%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Mali-G76 MP12, 9820, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	639 (min: 612, max: 683) MBit/s ∼94% +9%
Razer Phone 2 Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	604 (min: 420, max: 626) MBit/s ∼89% +3%
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Adreno 640, 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	586 (min: 267, max: 693) MBit/s ∼86%
Average of class Smartphone (5.9 - 939, n=397)	220 MBit/s ∼32% -62%
Xiaomi Black Shark Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	116 MBit/s ∼17% -80%
Asus ROG Phone Adreno 630, 845, 512 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	103 (min: 86, max: 109) MBit/s ∼15% -82%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Huawei P30 Pro Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	670 (min: 542, max: 717) MBit/s ∼100% +27%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Mali-G76 MP12, 9820, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	579 (min: 558, max: 592) MBit/s ∼86% +10%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Adreno 640, 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	534 (min: 430, max: 578) MBit/s ∼80% +1%
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Adreno 640, 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	527 (min: 410, max: 577) MBit/s ∼79%
Razer Phone 2 Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	388 (min: 234, max: 484) MBit/s ∼58% -26%
Average of class Smartphone (9.4 - 703, n=397)	210 MBit/s ∼31% -60%
Xiaomi Black Shark Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	117 MBit/s ∼17% -78%
Asus ROG Phone Adreno 630, 845, 512 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	96.7 (min: 50, max: 106) MBit/s ∼14% -82%

Top 10 Testrapporten

» Top 10 Multimedia Notebooks
» Top 10 Gaming-Notebooks
» Top 10 Budget Office/Business-Notebooks
» Top 10 Premium Office/Business-Notebooks
» Top 10 Workstation-Laptops
» Top 10 Lichtgewicht Gaming-Notebooks
» Top 10 Subnotebooks
» Top 10 Smartphones tot €120
» Top 10 Smartphones tot €300
» Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Top 10 Convertibles
» Top 10 Tablets
» Top 10 Windows-Tablets
» Top 10 Phablets (>5.5-inch)
» Top 10 Smartphones
» Top 10 Smartphones (≤5-inch)
» Best Geteste Notebook Beeldschermen
» Top 10 Notebooks tot € 1.000 De beste notebookbeeldschermen zoals getest door Notebookcheck
» Top 10 Notebooks tot €500
» Top 10 Notebooks tot €300

; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø585 (267-693)

; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø527 (410-577)

Beeldvergelijking

Bekijk een scène en navigeer binnen het eerste beeld. Eén klik wijzigt het zoomniveau. Eén klik op het ingezoomde beeld opent het origineel in een nieuw venster. Het eerste beeld toont de verschaalde foto van het testtoestel.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

klik om beelden te laden

Xiaomi Black Shark 2

Canon EOS 70D

Asus ROG Phone

Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus

klik om beelden te laden

Xiaomi Black Shark 2

Canon EOS 70D

Asus ROG Phone

Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus

klik om beelden te laden

Xiaomi Black Shark 2

Canon EOS 70D

Asus ROG Phone

Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus


401 cd/m²	406 cd/m²	424 cd/m²
404 cd/m²	409 cd/m²	423 cd/m²
407 cd/m²	410 cd/m²	423 cd/m²

Helderheidsverdeling

X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 424 cd/m² Gemiddelde: 411.9 cd/m² Minimum: 2.36 cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling: 95 %
Helderheid in Batterij-modus: 409 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Zwart: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.2 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6.1
ΔE Greyscale 4.8 | 0.64-98 Ø6.3
95.5% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.21

	Xiaomi Black Shark 2 AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.39	Asus ROG Phone AMOLED, 2160x1080, 6	Xiaomi Black Shark IPS, 2160x1080, 5.99	Razer Phone 2 IGZO LCD, UltraMotion 120 Hz Display, 2560x1440, 5.72	Samsung Galaxy S10 OLED, 3040x1440, 6.1	Huawei P30 Pro OLED, 2340x1080, 6.47	Xiaomi Mi 9 AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.39
Screen		3%	-2%	26%	38%	46%	53%
Brightness middle	409	597 46%	549 34%	600 47%	701 71%	597 46%	593 45%
Brightness	412	637 55%	541 31%	577 40%	705 71%	608 48%	587 42%
Brightness Distribution	95	83 -13%	95 0%	92 -3%	98 3%	89 -6%	94 -1%
Black Level *			0.42	0.31
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *	5.2	5.12 2%	6.08 -17%	3.43 34%	3.7 29%	2.2 58%	0.9 83%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *	8.9	10.9 -22%	10.69 -20%	6.36 29%	10.3 -16%	3.6 60%	2 78%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *	4.8	7.3 -52%	6.6 -38%	4.4 8%	1.4 71%	1.6 67%	1.5 69%
Gamma	2.21 ^100%	2.203 ^100%	2.305 ^95%	2.388 ^92%	2.1 ^105%	2.23 ^99%	2.27 ^97%
CCT	7430 ^87%	7371 ^88%	8399 ^77%	6069 ^107%	6553 ^99%	6268 ^104%	6548 ^99%
Contrast			1307	1935

* ... kleiner is beter

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

Om de schermhelderheid te verlagen schakelen sommige laptops het backlight erg snel aan en uit. Dit gebeurt aan een dergelijk hoge frequentie dat het niet zichtbaar is voor het menselijk oog. Als de frequentie te laag is kunnen personen met gevoelige ogen geïrriteerd geraken, hoofdpijn krijgen en zelfs flickering waarnemen.

Screen flickering / PWM waargenomen

242.7 Hz

≤ 99 % helderheid instelling

Het backlight van het scherm flikkert aan 242.7 Hz (hoogstwaarschijnlijk met PWM - Pulse-Width Modulation) aan een helderheid van 99 % en lager. Boven deze helderheid zou er geen flickering / PWM mogen optreden.

De frequentie van 242.7 Hz is redelijk laag en de meeste mensen die gevoelig zijn aan flickering kunnen dit dus waarnemen of geïrriteerde ogen krijgen (gebruikmakend van de vermelde helderheid en lager).

Ter vergelijking: 51 % van alle geteste toestellen maakten geen gebruik van PWM om de schermhelderheid te verlagen. Als het wel werd gebruikt, werd een gemiddelde van 9524 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz waargenomen.

Responstijd Scherm

ℹ

De responstijden van het scherm tonen hoe snel het scherm in staat is om van één kleur naar de andere te veranderen. Trage responstijden kunnen aanleiding geven tot 'nabeelden' rond bewegende objecten of het scherm wazig maken (blur). Vooral spelers van snelle 3D-games hebben baat bij een scherm met snelle responstijden.

↔ Responstijd Zwart naar Wit
4 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd	↗ 2 ms stijging
4 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd	↘ 2 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde erg snelle responstijden in onze tests en zou zeer geschikt moeten zijn voor snelle games. Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.8 (minimum) tot 240 (maximum) ms. » 1 % van alle toestellen zijn beter. Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd beter is dan het gemiddelde (25.3 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.
↔ Responstijd 50% Grijs naar 80% Grijs
4 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd	↗ 2 ms stijging
4 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd	↘ 2 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde erg snelle responstijden in onze tests en zou zeer geschikt moeten zijn voor snelle games. Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.9 (minimum) tot 636 (maximum) ms. » 1 % van alle toestellen zijn beter. Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd beter is dan het gemiddelde (40.4 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.

Geekbench 4.3
Compute RenderScript Score (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	7936 Points ∼55%
Asus ROG Phone Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	14489 Points ∼100% +83%
Xiaomi Black Shark Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	13620 Points ∼94% +72%
Razer Phone 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	13896 Points ∼96% +75%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	10128 Points ∼70% +28%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	8574 Points ∼59% +8%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	7482 Points ∼52% -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (7372 - 8024, n=6)	7627 Points ∼53% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (663 - 21070, n=299)	4513 Points ∼31% -43%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	11359 Points ∼100%
Asus ROG Phone Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	9231 Points ∼81% -19%
Xiaomi Black Shark Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	8453 Points ∼74% -26%
Razer Phone 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	9018 Points ∼79% -21%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	10162 Points ∼89% -11%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	9880 Points ∼87% -13%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	10999 Points ∼97% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (10187 - 11388, n=7)	11024 Points ∼97% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (1174 - 11598, n=353)	4479 Points ∼39% -61%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	3537 Points ∼79%
Asus ROG Phone Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	2500 Points ∼56% -29%
Xiaomi Black Shark Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	2437 Points ∼54% -31%
Razer Phone 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	2409 Points ∼54% -32%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	4499 Points ∼100% +27%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	3306 Points ∼73% -7%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	3523 Points ∼78% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (3460 - 3537, n=7)	3504 Points ∼78% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (758 - 4824, n=355)	1325 Points ∼29% -63%

PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	8342 Points ∼86%
Asus ROG Phone Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	9430 Points ∼97% +13%
Xiaomi Black Shark Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	8309 Points ∼85% 0%
Razer Phone 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	8701 Points ∼89% +4%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	7595 Points ∼78% -9%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	9135 Points ∼94% +10%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	9035 Points ∼93% +8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (8342 - 11440, n=6)	9741 Points ∼100% +17%
Average of class Smartphone (3227 - 11440, n=349)	4937 Points ∼51% -41%
Work performance score (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	10330 Points ∼79%
Asus ROG Phone Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	9707 Points ∼75% -6%
Razer Phone 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	10006 Points ∼77% -3%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	9750 Points ∼75% -6%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	12996 Points ∼100% +26%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	10985 Points ∼85% +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (10330 - 14439, n=6)	12230 Points ∼94% +18%
Average of class Smartphone (4096 - 14439, n=517)	5401 Points ∼42% -48%

3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	3365 Points ∼100%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	3183 Points ∼95% -5%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	3288 Points ∼98% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (3121 - 3365, n=6)	3265 Points ∼97% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (1849 - 15735, n=37)	2434 Points ∼72% -28%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	5768 Points ∼100%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	4688 Points ∼81% -19%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	5723 Points ∼99% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (5653 - 5862, n=6)	5760 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (209 - 14536, n=37)	2303 Points ∼40% -60%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	4978 Points ∼100%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	4242 Points ∼85% -15%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	4914 Points ∼99% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (4790 - 5012, n=6)	4923 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (260 - 14786, n=40)	1997 Points ∼40% -60%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	4535 Points ∼100%
Asus ROG Phone Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	3040 Points ∼67% -33%
Xiaomi Black Shark Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	3577 Points ∼79% -21%
Razer Phone 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	3540 Points ∼78% -22%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	2981 Points ∼66% -34%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	4171 Points ∼92% -8%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	3754 Points ∼83% -17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (3754 - 4535, n=6)	4244 Points ∼94% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (573 - 4535, n=363)	1813 Points ∼40% -60%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	7108 Points ∼100%
Asus ROG Phone Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	5673 Points ∼80% -20%
Xiaomi Black Shark Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	5770 Points ∼81% -19%
Razer Phone 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	5825 Points ∼82% -18%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	5358 Points ∼75% -25%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	4361 Points ∼61% -39%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	7076 Points ∼100% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (6951 - 7115, n=6)	7074 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (76 - 8206, n=363)	1548 Points ∼22% -78%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	6312 Points ∼100%
Asus ROG Phone Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	4757 Points ∼75% -25%
Xiaomi Black Shark Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	5078 Points ∼80% -20%
Razer Phone 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	5094 Points ∼81% -19%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	4551 Points ∼72% -28%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	4317 Points ∼68% -32%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	5913 Points ∼94% -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (5913 - 6312, n=6)	6156 Points ∼98% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (94 - 6312, n=366)	1445 Points ∼23% -77%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	4462 Points ∼100%
Asus ROG Phone Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	3763 Points ∼84% -16%
Xiaomi Black Shark Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	3570 Points ∼80% -20%
Razer Phone 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	3532 Points ∼79% -21%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	4164 Points ∼93% -7%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	3788 Points ∼85% -15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (3788 - 4462, n=5)	4206 Points ∼94% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (375 - 4493, n=377)	1782 Points ∼40% -60%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	10300 Points ∼100%
Asus ROG Phone Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	8345 Points ∼81% -19%
Xiaomi Black Shark Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	8451 Points ∼82% -18%
Razer Phone 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	8389 Points ∼81% -19%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	5767 Points ∼56% -44%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	10291 Points ∼100% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (10028 - 10420, n=5)	10268 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (131 - 14951, n=377)	2118 Points ∼21% -79%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	7980 Points ∼100%
Asus ROG Phone Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	6568 Points ∼82% -18%
Xiaomi Black Shark Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	6482 Points ∼81% -19%
Razer Phone 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	6425 Points ∼81% -19%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	5313 Points ∼67% -33%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	7449 Points ∼93% -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (7449 - 7980, n=5)	7771 Points ∼97% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (159 - 7980, n=378)	1805 Points ∼23% -77%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	4262 Points ∼100%
Asus ROG Phone Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	3637 Points ∼85% -15%
Xiaomi Black Shark Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	3408 Points ∼80% -20%
Razer Phone 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	3557 Points ∼83% -17%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	2854 Points ∼67% -33%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	3849 Points ∼90% -10%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	3758 Points ∼88% -12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (3037 - 4262, n=6)	3872 Points ∼91% -9%
Average of class Smartphone (486 - 4262, n=439)	1740 Points ∼41% -59%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	6362 Points ∼100%
Asus ROG Phone Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	5174 Points ∼81% -19%
Xiaomi Black Shark Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	5220 Points ∼82% -18%
Razer Phone 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	5113 Points ∼80% -20%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	5176 Points ∼81% -19%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	4400 Points ∼69% -31%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	6355 Points ∼100% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (6233 - 6362, n=6)	6312 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (65 - 6362, n=441)	1280 Points ∼20% -80%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	5734 Points ∼100%
Asus ROG Phone Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	4730 Points ∼82% -18%
Xiaomi Black Shark Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	4668 Points ∼81% -19%
Razer Phone 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	4660 Points ∼81% -19%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	4383 Points ∼76% -24%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	4264 Points ∼74% -26%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	5509 Points ∼96% -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (5104 - 5734, n=6)	5521 Points ∼96% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (80 - 5734, n=449)	1225 Points ∼21% -79%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	4240 Points ∼100%
Asus ROG Phone Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	3668 Points ∼87% -13%
Xiaomi Black Shark Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	3443 Points ∼81% -19%
Razer Phone 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	3587 Points ∼85% -15%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	3828 Points ∼90% -10%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	3614 Points ∼85% -15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (3614 - 4240, n=5)	3968 Points ∼94% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (512 - 4240, n=471)	1645 Points ∼39% -61%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	9983 Points ∼100%
Asus ROG Phone Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	8243 Points ∼83% -17%
Xiaomi Black Shark Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	8312 Points ∼83% -17%
Razer Phone 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	8006 Points ∼80% -20%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	5431 Points ∼54% -46%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	9963 Points ∼100% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (9653 - 10008, n=5)	9890 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (43 - 10008, n=471)	1735 Points ∼17% -83%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	7673 Points ∼100%
Asus ROG Phone Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	6454 Points ∼84% -16%
Xiaomi Black Shark Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	6324 Points ∼82% -18%
Razer Phone 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	6285 Points ∼82% -18%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	4969 Points ∼65% -35%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	7166 Points ∼93% -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (7166 - 7673, n=5)	7422 Points ∼97% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (55 - 7673, n=479)	1491 Points ∼19% -81%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	45072 Points ∼100%
Asus ROG Phone Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	37475 Points ∼83% -17%
Xiaomi Black Shark Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	31384 Points ∼70% -30%
Razer Phone 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	35578 Points ∼79% -21%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	31297 Points ∼69% -31%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	31483 Points ∼70% -30%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	25339 Points ∼56% -44%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (25339 - 45072, n=5)	34043 Points ∼76% -24%
Average of class Smartphone (4811 - 45072, n=631)	13525 Points ∼30% -70%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	110432 Points ∼100%
Asus ROG Phone Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	80283 Points ∼73% -27%
Xiaomi Black Shark Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	82423 Points ∼75% -25%
Razer Phone 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	80333 Points ∼73% -27%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	71292 Points ∼65% -35%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	63469 Points ∼57% -43%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	106534 Points ∼96% -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (106534 - 110432, n=5)	107520 Points ∼97% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (3585 - 162695, n=631)	19546 Points ∼18% -82%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	83518 Points ∼100%
Asus ROG Phone Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	64029 Points ∼77% -23%
Xiaomi Black Shark Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	60543 Points ∼72% -28%
Razer Phone 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	62783 Points ∼75% -25%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	55524 Points ∼66% -34%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	51779 Points ∼62% -38%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	62225 Points ∼75% -25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (62225 - 83518, n=5)	71771 Points ∼86% -14%
Average of class Smartphone (4164 - 83518, n=632)	16333 Points ∼20% -80%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	167 fps ∼100%
Asus ROG Phone Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	150 fps ∼90% -10%
Xiaomi Black Shark Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	151 fps ∼90% -10%
Razer Phone 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	152 fps ∼91% -9%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	143 fps ∼86% -14%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	138 fps ∼83% -17%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	167 fps ∼100% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (162 - 167, n=7)	166 fps ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (6 - 251, n=659)	34.1 fps ∼20% -80%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	60 fps ∼67%
Asus ROG Phone Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	89 fps ∼100% +48%
Xiaomi Black Shark Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	60 fps ∼67% 0%
Razer Phone 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	89 fps ∼100% +48%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	60 fps ∼67% 0%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	60 fps ∼67% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	60 fps ∼67% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (60 - 91, n=7)	64.6 fps ∼73% +8%
Average of class Smartphone (9.8 - 120, n=662)	26.5 fps ∼30% -56%

GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	102 fps ∼100%
Asus ROG Phone Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	83 fps ∼81% -19%
Xiaomi Black Shark Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	82 fps ∼80% -20%
Razer Phone 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	83 fps ∼81% -19%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	85 fps ∼83% -17%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	91 fps ∼89% -11%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	100 fps ∼98% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (97 - 102, n=7)	100 fps ∼98% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (2.7 - 132, n=578)	18.7 fps ∼18% -82%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	60 fps ∼80%
Asus ROG Phone Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	75 fps ∼100% +25%
Xiaomi Black Shark Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	59 fps ∼79% -2%
Razer Phone 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	56 fps ∼75% -7%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	53 fps ∼71% -12%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	59 fps ∼79% -2%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	60 fps ∼80% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (55 - 85, n=7)	62.4 fps ∼83% +4%
Average of class Smartphone (5.4 - 115, n=583)	17.4 fps ∼23% -71%

GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	71 fps ∼100%
Asus ROG Phone Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	60 fps ∼85% -15%
Xiaomi Black Shark Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	60 fps ∼85% -15%
Razer Phone 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	61 fps ∼86% -14%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	53 fps ∼75% -25%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	56 fps ∼79% -21%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	69 fps ∼97% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (41 - 71, n=7)	65.6 fps ∼92% -8%
Average of class Smartphone (1.6 - 88, n=440)	15.5 fps ∼22% -78%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	57 fps ∼98%
Asus ROG Phone Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	54 fps ∼93% -5%
Xiaomi Black Shark Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	53 fps ∼91% -7%
Razer Phone 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	37 fps ∼64% -35%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	30 fps ∼52% -47%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	47 fps ∼81% -18%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	58 fps ∼100% +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (36 - 58, n=7)	49.7 fps ∼86% -13%
Average of class Smartphone (3.4 - 110, n=443)	14.8 fps ∼26% -74%

GFXBench
High Tier Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	25 fps ∼100%
Asus ROG Phone Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	21 fps ∼84% -16%
Razer Phone 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	15 fps ∼60% -40%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	16 fps ∼64% -36%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	20 fps ∼80% -20%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	24 fps ∼96% -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (15 - 26, n=6)	23.2 fps ∼93% -7%
Average of class Smartphone (0.86 - 59, n=143)	8.76 fps ∼35% -65%
2560x1440 High Tier Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	17 fps ∼100%
Asus ROG Phone Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	14 fps ∼82% -18%
Razer Phone 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	14 fps ∼82% -18%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	17 fps ∼100% 0%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	14 fps ∼82% -18%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	16 fps ∼94% -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (16 - 17, n=7)	16.4 fps ∼96% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (0.26 - 31, n=143)	5.99 fps ∼35% -65%
Normal Tier Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	38 fps ∼100%
Asus ROG Phone Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	34 fps ∼89% -11%
Razer Phone 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	23 fps ∼61% -39%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	25 fps ∼66% -34%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	32 fps ∼84% -16%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	37 fps ∼97% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (23 - 38, n=6)	35 fps ∼92% -8%
Average of class Smartphone (1.8 - 59, n=145)	13 fps ∼34% -66%
1920x1080 Normal Tier Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	43 fps ∼98%
Asus ROG Phone Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	37 fps ∼84% -14%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	44 fps ∼100% +2%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	36 fps ∼82% -16%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	41 fps ∼93% -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (40.7 - 43, n=7)	42 fps ∼95% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (0.94 - 63, n=144)	14.4 fps ∼33% -67%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	42 fps ∼100%
Asus ROG Phone Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	35 fps ∼83% -17%
Xiaomi Black Shark Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	35 fps ∼83% -17%
Razer Phone 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	35 fps ∼83% -17%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	35 fps ∼83% -17%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	33 fps ∼79% -21%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	42 fps ∼100% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (41 - 42, n=7)	41.9 fps ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (0.89 - 54, n=369)	10.4 fps ∼25% -75%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	36 fps ∼95%
Asus ROG Phone Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	31 fps ∼82% -14%
Xiaomi Black Shark Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	31 fps ∼82% -14%
Razer Phone 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	22 fps ∼58% -39%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	23 fps ∼61% -36%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	27 fps ∼71% -25%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	38 fps ∼100% +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (21 - 38, n=7)	32.4 fps ∼85% -10%
Average of class Smartphone (1.6 - 58, n=373)	9.41 fps ∼25% -74%

Basemark GPU
1920x1080 OpenGL Medium Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	33.05 fps ∼88%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	33.04 (min: 9.22, max: 75.78) fps ∼88% 0%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	27.02 (min: 2.8, max: 80.83) fps ∼72% -18%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	37.41 fps ∼100% +13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (33.1 - 37.4, n=3)	35.9 fps ∼96% +9%
Average of class Smartphone (3.09 - 651, n=60)	25.9 fps ∼69% -22%
Vulkan Medium Native (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	27.16 (min: 8.36, max: 61.33) fps ∼84%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	28.46 (min: 9.24, max: 54.37) fps ∼88%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	32.2 fps ∼100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (22.7 - 32.2, n=2)	27.5 fps ∼85%
Average of class Smartphone (6.62 - 606, n=55)	23 fps ∼71%
1920x1080 Vulkan Medium Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	24.54 fps ∼64%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	38.35 (min: 8.77, max: 77.53) fps ∼100% +56%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	30.67 (min: 5.93, max: 132.19) fps ∼80% +25%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	35.63 fps ∼93% +45%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (24.5 - 36.3, n=3)	32.2 fps ∼84% +31%
Average of class Smartphone (0 - 739, n=55)	27.6 fps ∼72% +12%

AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	371562 Points ∼99%
Asus ROG Phone Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	299878 Points ∼80% -19%
Xiaomi Black Shark Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	290397 Points ∼77% -22%
Razer Phone 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	285952 Points ∼76% -23%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	328111 Points ∼88% -12%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	316199 Points ∼84% -15%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	374820 Points ∼100% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (217967 - 380913, n=7)	349259 Points ∼93% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (52607 - 380913, n=260)	127050 Points ∼34% -66%

VRMark - Amber Room (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	4486 Score ∼89%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	5020 Score ∼100% +12%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	4964 Score ∼99% +11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (4486 - 4969, n=3)	4806 Score ∼96% +7%
Average of class Smartphone (552 - 5025, n=57)	1909 Score ∼38% -57%

BaseMark OS II
Web (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	1264 Points ∼90%
Asus ROG Phone Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	1336 Points ∼95% +6%
Xiaomi Black Shark Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	1243 Points ∼88% -2%
Razer Phone 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	1226 Points ∼87% -3%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	1385 Points ∼98% +10%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	1409 Points ∼100% +11%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	1378 Points ∼98% +9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (1264 - 1415, n=6)	1373 Points ∼97% +9%
Average of class Smartphone (7 - 1731, n=590)	734 Points ∼52% -42%
Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	8125 Points ∼88%
Asus ROG Phone Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	7957 Points ∼86% -2%
Xiaomi Black Shark Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	5846 Points ∼63% -28%
Razer Phone 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	8001 Points ∼86% -2%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	7361 Points ∼79% -9%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	7758 Points ∼84% -5%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	9270 Points ∼100% +14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (8125 - 9477, n=6)	9165 Points ∼99% +13%
Average of class Smartphone (18 - 15969, n=590)	1889 Points ∼20% -77%
Memory (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	3560 Points ∼67%
Asus ROG Phone Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	5296 Points ∼100% +49%
Xiaomi Black Shark Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	2871 Points ∼54% -19%
Razer Phone 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	3906 Points ∼74% +10%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	4570 Points ∼86% +28%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	5210 Points ∼98% +46%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	4031 Points ∼76% +13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (3560 - 6661, n=6)	5013 Points ∼95% +41%
Average of class Smartphone (21 - 6661, n=590)	1413 Points ∼27% -60%
System (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	5993 Points ∼70%
Asus ROG Phone Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	8613 Points ∼100% +44%
Xiaomi Black Shark Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	7105 Points ∼82% +19%
Razer Phone 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	8120 Points ∼94% +35%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	7476 Points ∼87% +25%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	8572 Points ∼100% +43%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	8441 Points ∼98% +41%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (5993 - 9143, n=6)	8421 Points ∼98% +41%
Average of class Smartphone (369 - 12202, n=590)	2799 Points ∼32% -53%
Overall (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	3847 Points ∼80%
Asus ROG Phone Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	4693 Points ∼98% +22%
Xiaomi Black Shark Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	3489 Points ∼73% -9%
Razer Phone 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	4200 Points ∼88% +9%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	4320 Points ∼90% +12%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	4701 Points ∼98% +22%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	4595 Points ∼96% +19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (3847 - 5314, n=6)	4791 Points ∼100% +25%
Average of class Smartphone (150 - 6097, n=594)	1389 Points ∼29% -64%

Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	1075 Points ∼56%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	1927 Points ∼100% +79%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	1627 Points ∼84% +51%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	1415 Points ∼73% +32%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (1075 - 1425, n=3)	1305 Points ∼68% +21%
Average of class Smartphone (35 - 2754, n=98)	701 Points ∼36% -35%

Jetstream 2 | Speedometer 2.0 | WebXPRT 3 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Huawei P30 Pro (Chrome 73)	60.469 Points ∼100% +33%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (45.5 - 63.1, n=5)	57.4 Points ∼95% +26%
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73)	57.207 Points ∼95% +26%
Asus ROG Phone (Chrome 74)	48.929 Points ∼81% +7%
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 (Chrome 73.0.3683.90)	45.538 Points ∼75%
Average of class Smartphone (14.7 - 108, n=70)	29 Points ∼48% -36%

Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Huawei P30 Pro (Chrome 73)	67.8 runs/min ∼100% +45%
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75)	65.7 runs/min ∼97% +41%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (46.7 - 67.9, n=4)	60.5 runs/min ∼89% +30%
Asus ROG Phone (Chrome 74)	54.1 runs/min ∼80% +16%
Samsung Galaxy S10 (Samsung Browser 9.0)	54 runs/min ∼80% +16%
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 (Chrome 73.0.3683.90)	46.7 runs/min ∼69%
Average of class Smartphone (6.42 - 123, n=64)	33 runs/min ∼49% -29%

WebXPRT 3 - ---
Huawei P30 Pro (Chrome 73)	122 Points ∼100% +30%
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75)	108 Points ∼89% +15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (94 - 114, n=7)	107 Points ∼88% +14%
Asus ROG Phone (Chrome 70)	103 Points ∼84% +10%
Razer Phone 2 (Chrome 68)	96 Points ∼79% +2%
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 (Chrome 73.0.3683.90)	94 Points ∼77%
Xiaomi Black Shark (Firefox 61)	90 Points ∼74% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 161, n=124)	62.7 Points ∼51% -33%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75)	24534 Points ∼100% +44%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (17011 - 25051, n=7)	22464 Points ∼92% +32%
Huawei P30 Pro (Chrome 73)	22447 Points ∼91% +32%
Samsung Galaxy S10 (Samsung Browser 9.0)	20286 Points ∼83% +19%
Asus ROG Phone (Chrome 70)	18275 Points ∼74% +7%
Razer Phone 2 (Chrome 68)	17067 Points ∼70% 0%
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 (Chrome 73.0.3683.90)	17011 Points ∼69%
Xiaomi Black Shark (Firefox 61)	13663 Points ∼56% -20%
Average of class Smartphone (1994 - 43280, n=651)	6118 Points ∼25% -64%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (603 - 59466, n=671)	10898 ms * ∼100% -331%
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 (Chrome 73.0.3683.90)	2528.6 ms * ∼23%
Xiaomi Black Shark (Firefox 61)	2287 ms * ∼21% +10%
Razer Phone 2 (Chrome 68)	2282.6 ms * ∼21% +10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (1873 - 2611, n=6)	2211 ms * ∼20% +13%
Asus ROG Phone (Chrome 70)	2154 ms * ∼20% +15%
Huawei P30 Pro (Chrome 73)	2009.1 ms * ∼18% +21%
Samsung Galaxy S10 (Samsung Browser 9.0)	1924.2 ms * ∼18% +24%
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75)	1873.2 ms * ∼17% +26%

* ... kleiner is beter

	Xiaomi Black Shark 2	Asus ROG Phone	Xiaomi Black Shark	Razer Phone 2	Samsung Galaxy S10	Huawei P30 Pro	Xiaomi Mi 9	Average 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		130%	85%	-7%	-1%	148%	162%	53%	-54%
Random Write 4KB	25	152.03 508%	114.1 356%	23.99 -4%	24.44 -2%	159.22 537%	165.32 561%	81.1 (18.2 - 250, n=33) 224%	19.3 (0.14 - 250, n=701) -23%
Random Read 4KB	145.18	141.61 -2%	127.2 -12%	124.31 -14%	137.4 -5%	174.36 20%	149.36 3%	137 (98.9 - 158, n=33) -6%	43.9 (1.59 - 175, n=701) -70%
Sequential Write 256KB	195.65	243.3 24%	199.6 2%	194.81 0%	193.24 -1%	250.82 28%	388.27 98%	198 (183 - 212, n=33) 1%	90.4 (2.99 - 392, n=701) -54%
Sequential Read 256KB	792.81	724.68 -9%	741.5 -6%	733.22 -8%	831.94 5%	849.48 7%	666.06 -16%	742 (427 - 912, n=33) -6%	255 (12.1 - 1468, n=701) -68%

PUBG Mobile

; 0.12.0: Ø29.9 (28-31)

World of Tanks Blitz

; 5.10.0.372: Ø59.5 (23-61)

Subway Surfers

; 1.102.0: Ø59.3 (5-61)

Max. Belasting

Inactief


30.8 °C	31.1 °C	30.7 °C
30.8 °C	30.2 °C	30.8 °C
30.6 °C	30.1 °C	29.5 °C

Maximum: 31.1 °C
Gemiddelde: 30.5 °C


29 °C	29 °C	29.5 °C
28.8 °C	29.2 °C	30.1 °C
28.8 °C	29.1 °C	30.1 °C

Maximum: 30.1 °C
Gemiddelde: 29.3 °C

Stroomadapter (max.) 26.9 °C | Kamertemperatuur 22 °C | Voltcraft IR-260

(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 30.5 °C / 87 F, compared to the average of 33.1 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 31.1 °C / 88 F, compared to the average of 35.6 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 30.1 °C / 86 F, compared to the average of 34.1 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.6 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 33.1 °C / 92 F.

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Xiaomi Black Shark 2 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 26% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 68% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Asus ROG Phone audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 24% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 69% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Stroomgebruik

Uit / Standby	0.02 / 0.26 Watt
Inactief	0.73 / 1.01 / 1.13 Watt
Belasting	3.64 / 8.86 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Xiaomi Black Shark 2 4000 mAh	Asus ROG Phone 4000 mAh	Xiaomi Black Shark 4000 mAh	Razer Phone 2 4000 mAh	Samsung Galaxy S10 3400 mAh	Huawei P30 Pro 4200 mAh	Xiaomi Mi 9 3300 mAh	Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		-19%	-42%	-60%	-18%	-55%	-8%	-31%	-30%
Idle Minimum *	0.73	0.6 18%	0.8 -10%	0.6 18%	0.61 16%	0.68 7%	0.67 8%	0.88 (0.6 - 1.3, n=7) -21%	0.881 (0.2 - 3.4, n=727) -21%
Idle Average *	1.01	1.4 -39%	1.5 -49%	1.5 -49%	1.27 -26%	2.6 -157%	1.26 -25%	1.446 (1.01 - 2.2, n=7) -43%	1.736 (0.6 - 6.2, n=726) -72%
Idle Maximum *	1.13	1.7 -50%	2.3 -104%	2.6 -130%	1.3 -15%	2.77 -145%	1.29 -14%	1.914 (1.13 - 2.9, n=7) -69%	2.02 (0.74 - 6.6, n=727) -79%
Load Average *	3.64	3.8 -4%	4.8 -32%	7.2 -98%	6.17 -70%	3.74 -3%	3.71 -2%	4.49 (3.64 - 5.8, n=7) -23%	4.07 (0.8 - 10.8, n=721) -12%
Load Maximum *	8.86	10.6 -20%	10.1 -14%	12.3 -39%	8.55 3%	6.82 23%	9.3 -5%	8.65 (7.49 - 10.2, n=7) 2%	5.87 (1.2 - 14.2, n=721) 34%

* ... kleiner is beter

Batterijduur

Inactief (zonder WLAN, minimale helderheid)		15h 52min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3		12h 54min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		11h 06min
Belast (maximale helderheid)		4h 55min

	Xiaomi Black Shark 2 4000 mAh	Asus ROG Phone 4000 mAh	Xiaomi Black Shark 4000 mAh	Razer Phone 2 4000 mAh	Samsung Galaxy S10 3400 mAh	Huawei P30 Pro 4200 mAh	Xiaomi Mi 9 3300 mAh
Batterijduur		-5%	19%	5%	-7%	53%	15%
Reader / Idle	952	1110 17%	1753 84%	1630 71%	1259 32%	1966 107%	1650 73%
H.264	666	800 20%	747 12%	742 11%	842 26%	1193 79%	1008 51%
WiFi v1.3	774	533 -31%	711 -8%	531 -31%	427 -45%	838 8%	546 -29%
Load	295	216 -27%	253 -14%	206 -30%	170 -42%	344 17%	194 -34%

Pro

+ extreem snelle SoC

+ uitstekende gaming prestaties

+ snelle Wi-Fi

+ dual-SIM en VoLTE

+ premium, zeer stabiele behuizing

+ helder AMOLED-beeldscherm met grote kleurruimte

+ goede camera's bij daglicht

+ blijft erg koel onder belasting

Contra

- geen IP-certificering

- geen microSD-slot

- heeft een adapter nodig voor een 3,5 mm audio-aansluiting

- gemiddelde batterijlevensduur

- geen draadloos opladen

- geen NFC

Samenvatting

Getset: Xiaomi Black Shark 2. Testmodel geleverd door:

Voor het volledige, Engelse testrapport, klik hier.

De Xiaomi Black Shark 2 is een must voor gamers: het is op dit moment de snelste gaming-smartphone die je kunt krijgen, en het levert zulke geweldige prestaties dat het elk willekeurig Android-spel moeiteloos kan draaien op 60 FPS, zelfs bij maximale grafische instellingen. Hogere framesnelheden zijn niet mogelijk omdat het OLED-display op de Black Shark 2 slechts tot 60 Hz ondersteunt.

Naast de krachtige SoC profiteren games ook van de passieve vloeistofkoeling van Xiaomi, waardoor de smartphone zelfs tijdens lange gamesessies optimaal kan presteren, maar ook comfortabel blijft.

Als u op zoek bent naar een gaming-smartphone, is de Xiaomi Black Shark 2 momenteel de beste keuze.

De optioneel verkrijgbare controllers en het Shark Space-gamemenu zijn leuke extra's. Met Shark Space kun je de Ludicrous Modus activeren, wat een soort naverbrander is voor games - het is op dit moment echter niet nodig omdat er geen één spel te zwaar is voor de telefoon. Gamers zullen al tevreden zijn met de 8 GB/128 GB-variant, die officieel geprijsd is op €549 - echter, voor slechts €100 meer, is een model met 12 GB RAM en 256 GB opslag ook verkrijgbaar.

Wanneer je de internationale versie van de Xiaomi Black Shark 2 koopt, ontvang je Android 9 ook in het Duits en met de Google-apps al voorgeïnstalleerd. Maar het ontbreken van een microSD-slot is teleurstellend, evenals de noodzaak van een 3,5 mm audio naar USB-C adapter.

Xiaomi Black Shark 2 - 2019-05-0606-05-2019 v6
Manuel Masiero

Behuizing

88%

Toetsenbord

67 / 75 → 89%

Aanwijsapparaat

93%

Aansluitmogelijkheden

44 / 60 → 74%

Gewicht

88%

Batterij

94%

Beeldscherm

83%

Gaming-performance

73 / 63 → 100%

Applicatie-performance

79 / 70 → 100%

Temperatuur

94%

Luidheid

100%

Audio

75 / 91 → 82%

Camera

77%

Gemiddelde

81%

87%

Smartphone - Gewogen Gemiddelde

Kort testrapport Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Smartphone

Size comparison

Top 10 Testrapporten

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Responstijd Scherm

PUBG Mobile

World of Tanks Blitz

Subway Surfers

Xiaomi Black Shark 2 audio analysis

Asus ROG Phone audio analysis

Pro

Contra

Samenvatting

Pricecompare