Notebookcheck

Kort testrapport Vivo IQOO Smartphone

A cheap gaming smartphone with a few tricks up its sleeve. Vivo maakt een return en heeft deze keer een betaalbare game smartphone op de markt gebracht. De IQOO heeft een verdampingskamer koelsysteem, aanraakgevoelige schouderknoppen en een meeslepend 6.41-inch AMOLED beeldscherm. Vivo heeft een Snapdragon 855 SoC gebruikt, die helpt om moderne topmodellen bij te houden. Lees verder om te zien of de Vivo IQOO de verwachtingen kan waarmaken.

Vivo IQOO (IQOO Serie)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
Grafische kaart
Qualcomm Adreno 640
Geheugen
6144 MB 
Beeldscherm
6.41 inch 19.5:9, 2340 x 1080 pixel 402 PPI, capacitief, AMOLED, glimmend: ja
Opslag
128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 128 GB 
, 108 GB beschikbaar
Verbindingen
1 USB 2.0, Audio Verbindingen: 3.5-mm audio aansluiting, 1 Vingerafdruklezer, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensoren: versnellingssensor, e-kompas, gyroscoop, nabijheidssensor
Netwerkmogelijkheden
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5, 2G GSM: 850, 900, 1,800, 1,900 MHz. 3G/WCDMA: 850, 1,900, 2,100 MHz. 4G/LTE/FDD/TDD: B1, B2, B3, B4, B5, B7, B8, B12, B17, B34, B38, B39, B40, B41., Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Afmetingen
hoogte x breedte x diepte (in mm): 8.51 x 157.7 x 75.2
Batterij
4000 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Besturingssysteem
Android 9.0 Pie
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix 12 MP, f/1.8. 13 MP, f/2.4 ultra-wide sensor. 2 MP diepte sensor.
Secondary Camera: 12 MPix f/2.0
Bijkomende functionaliteiten
Luidsprekers: 1, Toetsenbord: virtueel toetsenbord, Toetsenbordverlichting: ja, USB oplader, USB Type-C kabel, beschermende cover, SIM-tool, FunTouch OS, 12 Maanden Garantie
Gewicht
196 g, Voeding: 120 g
Prijs
440 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Vivo IQOO
Vivo IQOO
Vivo IQOO
Vivo IQOO
Vivo IQOO
Vivo IQOO

Size Comparison

167 mm 73 mm 8.3 mm 180 g160.1 mm 76.1 mm 8.2 mm 167 g157.7 mm 75.2 mm 8.51 mm 196 g157.5 mm 74.67 mm 7.61 mm 173 g154.8 mm 75.8 mm 8 mm 180 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Mi 9
Adreno 640, 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
678 (min: 549, max: 725) MBit/s ∼100% +599%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Adreno 616, 670, 64 GB eMMC Flash
668 (min: 617, max: 692) MBit/s ∼99% +589%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Adreno 509, 636, 64 GB eMMC Flash
317 (min: 163, max: 343) MBit/s ∼47% +227%
Nokia 8.1
Adreno 616, 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
312 (min: 273, max: 341) MBit/s ∼46% +222%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 939, n=434)
226 MBit/s ∼33% +133%
Vivo IQOO
Adreno 640, 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
97 (min: 92, max: 99) MBit/s ∼14%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Google Pixel 3a XL
Adreno 616, 670, 64 GB eMMC Flash
580 (min: 548, max: 602) MBit/s ∼100% +452%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Adreno 640, 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
534 (min: 430, max: 578) MBit/s ∼92% +409%
Nokia 8.1
Adreno 616, 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
300 (min: 169, max: 367) MBit/s ∼52% +186%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 703, n=434)
216 MBit/s ∼37% +106%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Adreno 509, 636, 64 GB eMMC Flash
153 (min: 133, max: 180) MBit/s ∼26% +46%
Vivo IQOO
Adreno 640, 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
105 (min: 101, max: 111) MBit/s ∼18%
0102030405060708090100110120Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø96.2 (92-99)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø105 (101-111)
GPS Test: Vivo IQOO - Overview
GPS Test: Vivo IQOO - Overview
GPS Test: Vivo IQOO - Bridge
GPS Test: Vivo IQOO - Bridge
GPS Test: Vivo IQOO - Loop
GPS Test: Vivo IQOO - Loop
GPS Test: Garmin Edge 520 - Overview
GPS Test: Garmin Edge 520 - Overview
GPS Test: Garmin Edge 520 - Bridge
GPS Test: Garmin Edge 520 - Bridge
GPS Test: Garmin Edge 520 - Loop
GPS Test: Garmin Edge 520 - Loop

Beeldvergelijking

Bekijk een scène en navigeer binnen het eerste beeld. Eén klik wijzigt het zoomniveau. Eén klik op het ingezoomde beeld opent het origineel in een nieuw venster. Het eerste beeld toont de verschaalde foto van het testtoestel.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
klik om beelden te laden
A photo of our test chart
A photo of our test chart
Our test chart in detail
620
cd/m²
613
cd/m²
625
cd/m²
618
cd/m²
612
cd/m²
616
cd/m²
626
cd/m²
620
cd/m²
616
cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 626 cd/m² Gemiddelde: 618.4 cd/m² Minimum: 2.2 cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling: 98 %
Helderheid in Batterij-modus: 612 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Zwart: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.37 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6
ΔE Greyscale 4.8 | 0.64-98 Ø6.2
99.4% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.255
Vivo IQOO
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.41
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
IPS, 2520x1080, 6.5
Xiaomi Mi 9
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.39
Nokia 8.1
IPS, 2246x1080, 6.18
Google Pixel 3a XL
OLED, 2160x1080, 6
Screen
-13%
37%
4%
26%
Brightness middle
612
572
-7%
593
-3%
567
-7%
409
-33%
Brightness
618
580
-6%
587
-5%
547
-11%
410
-34%
Brightness Distribution
98
96
-2%
94
-4%
92
-6%
96
-2%
Black Level *
0.4
0.61
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
5.37
4.5
16%
0.9
83%
4.39
18%
1.3
76%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
10.65
12.2
-15%
2
81%
7.28
32%
2.3
78%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
4.8
7.9
-65%
1.5
69%
4.9
-2%
1.5
69%
Gamma
2.255 98%
2.16 102%
2.27 97%
2.248 98%
2.22 99%
CCT
7440 87%
8726 74%
6548 99%
7642 85%
6621 98%
Contrast
1430
930

* ... kleiner is beter

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Om de schermhelderheid te verlagen schakelen sommige laptops het backlight erg snel aan en uit. Dit gebeurt aan een dergelijk hoge frequentie dat het niet zichtbaar is voor het menselijk oog. Als de frequentie te laag is kunnen personen met gevoelige ogen geïrriteerd geraken, hoofdpijn krijgen en zelfs flickering waarnemen.
Screen flickering / PWM waargenomen 219 Hz

Het backlight van het scherm flikkert aan 219 Hz (hoogstwaarschijnlijk met PWM - Pulse-Width Modulation) .

De frequentie van 219 Hz is redelijk laag en de meeste mensen die gevoelig zijn aan flickering kunnen dit dus waarnemen of geïrriteerde ogen krijgen (gebruikmakend van de vermelde helderheid en lager).

Ter vergelijking: 51 % van alle geteste toestellen maakten geen gebruik van PWM om de schermhelderheid te verlagen. Als het wel werd gebruikt, werd een gemiddelde van 9352 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz waargenomen.

Responstijd Scherm

De responstijden van het scherm tonen hoe snel het scherm in staat is om van één kleur naar de andere te veranderen. Trage responstijden kunnen aanleiding geven tot 'nabeelden' rond bewegende objecten of het scherm wazig maken (blur). Vooral spelers van snelle 3D-games hebben baat bij een scherm met snelle responstijden.
       Responstijd Zwart naar Wit
6 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd↗ 3 ms stijging
↘ 3 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde erg snelle responstijden in onze tests en zou zeer geschikt moeten zijn voor snelle games.
Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.8 (minimum) tot 240 (maximum) ms. » 4 % van alle toestellen zijn beter.
Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd beter is dan het gemiddelde (24.9 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.
       Responstijd 50% Grijs naar 80% Grijs
6 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd↗ 3 ms stijging
↘ 3 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde erg snelle responstijden in onze tests en zou zeer geschikt moeten zijn voor snelle games.
Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.9 (minimum) tot 636 (maximum) ms. » 4 % van alle toestellen zijn beter.
Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd beter is dan het gemiddelde (39.7 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.
Geekbench 4.4
Compute RenderScript Score (sorteer op waarde)
Vivo IQOO
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7480 Points ∼98%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
4278 Points ∼56% -43%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7482 Points ∼98% 0%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
6813 Points ∼90% -9%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
6479 Points ∼85% -13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (7372 - 8024, n=10)
7597 Points ∼100% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (663 - 21070, n=320)
4684 Points ∼62% -37%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sorteer op waarde)
Vivo IQOO
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
10187 Points ∼93%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
4804 Points ∼44% -53%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
10999 Points ∼100% +8%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
5856 Points ∼53% -43%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
5172 Points ∼47% -49%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (10187 - 11388, n=12)
10936 Points ∼99% +7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (883 - 11598, n=379)
4700 Points ∼43% -54%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sorteer op waarde)
Vivo IQOO
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3460 Points ∼98%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
1346 Points ∼38% -61%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3523 Points ∼100% +2%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
1799 Points ∼51% -48%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
1616 Points ∼46% -53%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (3406 - 3537, n=12)
3482 Points ∼99% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (390 - 4824, n=379)
1419 Points ∼40% -59%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sorteer op waarde)
Vivo IQOO
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
10450 Points ∼100%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
6018 Points ∼58% -42%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9035 Points ∼86% -14%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
6887 Points ∼66% -34%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
7377 Points ∼71% -29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (8342 - 11440, n=13)
9567 Points ∼92% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2630 - 11440, n=371)
5249 Points ∼50% -50%
Work performance score (sorteer op waarde)
Vivo IQOO
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
14439 Points ∼100%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
7181 Points ∼50% -50%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
10985 Points ∼76% -24%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
8309 Points ∼58% -42%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
9397 Points ∼65% -35%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (10330 - 14439, n=13)
12001 Points ∼83% -17%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1077 - 14439, n=542)
5678 Points ∼39% -61%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Vivo IQOO
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3121 Points ∼95%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
2282 Points ∼69% -27%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3288 Points ∼100% +5%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
2314 Points ∼70% -26%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (2104 - 3365, n=13)
2999 Points ∼91% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1740 - 15735, n=57)
2697 Points ∼82% -14%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Vivo IQOO
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5653 Points ∼99%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
809 Points ∼14% -86%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5723 Points ∼100% +1%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
1416 Points ∼25% -75%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (4236 - 5884, n=13)
5595 Points ∼98% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (203 - 14536, n=57)
2792 Points ∼49% -51%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sorteer op waarde)
Vivo IQOO
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4790 Points ∼97%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
944 Points ∼19% -80%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4914 Points ∼100% +3%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
1550 Points ∼32% -68%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (3800 - 5012, n=13)
4679 Points ∼95% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (253 - 14786, n=57)
2534 Points ∼52% -47%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Vivo IQOO
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4037 Points ∼100%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
2345 Points ∼58% -42%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3754 Points ∼93% -7%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
2534 Points ∼63% -37%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
2532 Points ∼63% -37%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (1934 - 4535, n=13)
3794 Points ∼94% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 4635, n=379)
1957 Points ∼48% -52%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Vivo IQOO
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
6951 Points ∼98%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
862 Points ∼12% -88%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7076 Points ∼100% +2%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
1845 Points ∼26% -73%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
1612 Points ∼23% -77%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (5184 - 7115, n=13)
6774 Points ∼96% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (75 - 8374, n=379)
1761 Points ∼25% -75%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sorteer op waarde)
Vivo IQOO
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5990 Points ∼100%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
1003 Points ∼17% -83%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5913 Points ∼99% -1%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
1964 Points ∼33% -67%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
1754 Points ∼29% -71%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (3969 - 6312, n=13)
5728 Points ∼96% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (93 - 6875, n=380)
1634 Points ∼27% -73%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Vivo IQOO
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4023 Points ∼100%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
2352 Points ∼58% -42%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3788 Points ∼94% -6%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
2516 Points ∼63% -37%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
2495 Points ∼62% -38%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (2345 - 4703, n=12)
3909 Points ∼97% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 4703, n=408)
1866 Points ∼46% -54%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Vivo IQOO
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
10028 Points ∼97%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
1397 Points ∼14% -86%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
10291 Points ∼100% +3%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
2855 Points ∼28% -72%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
2537 Points ∼25% -75%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (6358 - 10420, n=12)
9480 Points ∼92% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (70 - 20154, n=408)
2340 Points ∼23% -77%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sorteer op waarde)
Vivo IQOO
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7530 Points ∼100%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
1536 Points ∼20% -80%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7449 Points ∼99% -1%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
2772 Points ∼37% -63%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
2528 Points ∼34% -66%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (5268 - 8141, n=12)
7158 Points ∼95% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (88 - 10427, n=408)
1966 Points ∼26% -74%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Vivo IQOO
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4017 Points ∼100%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
2351 Points ∼59% -41%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3758 Points ∼94% -6%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
2514 Points ∼63% -37%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
2466 Points ∼61% -39%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (2705 - 4320, n=13)
3789 Points ∼94% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (486 - 4492, n=459)
1864 Points ∼46% -54%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Vivo IQOO
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
6233 Points ∼98%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
808 Points ∼13% -87%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
6355 Points ∼100% +2%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
1702 Points ∼27% -73%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
1487 Points ∼23% -76%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (5663 - 6362, n=13)
6236 Points ∼98% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53 - 7150, n=459)
1452 Points ∼23% -77%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sorteer op waarde)
Vivo IQOO
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5552 Points ∼100%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
946 Points ∼17% -83%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5509 Points ∼99% -1%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
1834 Points ∼33% -67%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
1631 Points ∼29% -71%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (4556 - 5734, n=13)
5435 Points ∼98% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 6319, n=460)
1398 Points ∼25% -75%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Vivo IQOO
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3826 Points ∼98%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
2349 Points ∼60% -39%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3614 Points ∼93% -6%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
2467 Points ∼63% -36%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
2489 Points ∼64% -35%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (3505 - 4454, n=12)
3900 Points ∼100% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (293 - 4454, n=500)
1727 Points ∼44% -55%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Vivo IQOO
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9653 Points ∼97%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
1327 Points ∼13% -86%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9963 Points ∼100% +3%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
2763 Points ∼28% -71%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
2428 Points ∼24% -75%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (6122 - 10008, n=12)
9215 Points ∼92% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 11302, n=499)
1891 Points ∼19% -80%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sorteer op waarde)
Vivo IQOO
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7212 Points ∼100%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
1469 Points ∼20% -80%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7166 Points ∼99% -1%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
2691 Points ∼37% -63%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
2441 Points ∼34% -66%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (5251 - 7820, n=12)
7061 Points ∼98% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 8136, n=502)
1636 Points ∼23% -77%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Vivo IQOO
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
41855 Points ∼100%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
25339 Points ∼61% -39%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
14820 Points ∼35% -65%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
14631 Points ∼35% -65%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (23877 - 45072, n=12)
31646 Points ∼76% -24%
Average of class Smartphone
  (735 - 45072, n=661)
14062 Points ∼34% -66%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sorteer op waarde)
Vivo IQOO
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
107036 Points ∼100%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
106534 Points ∼100% 0%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
39655 Points ∼37% -63%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
35596 Points ∼33% -67%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (97354 - 110432, n=11)
105893 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (536 - 209204, n=659)
21674 Points ∼20% -80%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sorteer op waarde)
Vivo IQOO
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
79518 Points ∼100%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
62225 Points ∼78% -22%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
28895 Points ∼36% -64%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
26999 Points ∼34% -66%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (60279 - 83518, n=11)
68789 Points ∼87% -13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (662 - 97276, n=659)
17596 Points ∼22% -78%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sorteer op waarde)
Vivo IQOO
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
162 fps ∼97%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
35 fps ∼21% -78%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
167 fps ∼100% +3%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
65 fps ∼39% -60%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
58 fps ∼35% -64%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (85 - 167, n=14)
157 fps ∼94% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.5 - 322, n=682)
37.5 fps ∼22% -77%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sorteer op waarde)
Vivo IQOO
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
60 fps ∼95%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
30 fps ∼48% -50%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
60 fps ∼95% 0%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
57 fps ∼91% -5%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
53 fps ∼84% -12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (59 - 91, n=14)
62.9 fps ∼100% +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 120, n=691)
27.8 fps ∼44% -54%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sorteer op waarde)
Vivo IQOO
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
97 fps ∼97%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
16 fps ∼16% -84%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
100 fps ∼100% +3%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
32 fps ∼32% -67%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
29 fps ∼29% -70%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (50 - 102, n=14)
94.8 fps ∼95% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.8 - 175, n=588)
21.6 fps ∼22% -78%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sorteer op waarde)
Vivo IQOO
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
60 fps ∼100%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
13 fps ∼22% -78%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
60 fps ∼100% 0%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
31 fps ∼52% -48%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
28 fps ∼47% -53%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (51 - 85, n=14)
60 fps ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 115, n=597)
19.2 fps ∼32% -68%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Vivo IQOO
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
69 fps ∼100%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
10 fps ∼14% -86%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
69 fps ∼100% 0%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
23 fps ∼33% -67%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
20 fps ∼29% -71%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (35 - 71, n=14)
62.7 fps ∼91% -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.87 - 117, n=454)
17.7 fps ∼26% -74%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Vivo IQOO
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
56 fps ∼97%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
8.4 fps ∼14% -85%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
58 fps ∼100% +4%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
22 fps ∼38% -61%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
19 fps ∼33% -66%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (36 - 58, n=14)
48.1 fps ∼83% -14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 110, n=456)
16.6 fps ∼29% -70%
GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Vivo IQOO
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
24 fps ∼100%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
3.2 fps ∼13% -87%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
24 fps ∼100% 0%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
8.2 fps ∼34% -66%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
7.2 fps ∼30% -70%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (14 - 26, n=13)
21 fps ∼88% -12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.61 - 60, n=172)
10.2 fps ∼43% -57%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Vivo IQOO
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
16 fps ∼95%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
2.2 fps ∼13% -86%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
16 fps ∼95% 0%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
5 fps ∼30% -69%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
4.5 fps ∼27% -72%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (8.5 - 24, n=14)
16.8 fps ∼100% +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.21 - 33, n=171)
7.05 fps ∼42% -56%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Vivo IQOO
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
36 fps ∼97%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
4.9 fps ∼13% -86%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
37 fps ∼100% +3%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
13 fps ∼35% -64%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
11 fps ∼30% -69%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (22 - 38, n=13)
33.2 fps ∼90% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 60, n=176)
14.9 fps ∼40% -59%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Vivo IQOO
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
41 fps ∼100%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
6.1 fps ∼15% -85%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
41 fps ∼100% 0%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
14 fps ∼34% -66%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
12 fps ∼29% -71%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (22 - 43, n=14)
40.6 fps ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 87, n=176)
16.6 fps ∼40% -60%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Vivo IQOO
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
41 fps ∼98%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
6.3 fps ∼15% -85%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
42 fps ∼100% +2%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
13 fps ∼31% -68%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
11 fps ∼26% -73%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (22 - 42, n=14)
39.9 fps ∼95% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 73, n=379)
12.1 fps ∼29% -70%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Vivo IQOO
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
35 fps ∼92%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
5.1 fps ∼13% -85%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
38 fps ∼100% +9%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
12 fps ∼32% -66%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
11 fps ∼29% -69%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (21 - 41, n=14)
32.1 fps ∼84% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.1 - 60, n=383)
10.8 fps ∼28% -69%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sorteer op waarde)
Vivo IQOO
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
217967 Points ∼58%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
117574 Points ∼31% -46%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
374820 Points ∼100% +72%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
169262 Points ∼45% -22%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
158868 Points ∼42% -27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (217967 - 398720, n=14)
354671 Points ∼95% +63%
Average of class Smartphone
  (17073 - 462516, n=290)
141701 Points ∼38% -35%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sorteer op waarde)
Vivo IQOO
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
1415 Points ∼100%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
1046 Points ∼74% -26%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
1378 Points ∼97% -3%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
1077 Points ∼76% -24%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
1186 Points ∼84% -16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (1076 - 1431, n=13)
1316 Points ∼93% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7 - 1745, n=626)
754 Points ∼53% -47%
Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Vivo IQOO
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9254 Points ∼100%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
1611 Points ∼17% -83%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9270 Points ∼100% 0%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
3086 Points ∼33% -67%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
2815 Points ∼30% -70%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (8125 - 9510, n=13)
9160 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (18 - 16996, n=626)
2035 Points ∼22% -78%
Memory (sorteer op waarde)
Vivo IQOO
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4970 Points ∼99%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
1236 Points ∼25% -75%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4031 Points ∼80% -19%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
2947 Points ∼59% -41%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
3316 Points ∼66% -33%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (2661 - 7500, n=13)
5023 Points ∼100% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (21 - 7500, n=626)
1503 Points ∼30% -70%
System (sorteer op waarde)
Vivo IQOO
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
8974 Points ∼100%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
4342 Points ∼48% -52%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
8441 Points ∼94% -6%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
5681 Points ∼63% -37%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
5507 Points ∼61% -39%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (5993 - 9143, n=13)
8498 Points ∼95% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (369 - 14189, n=626)
2951 Points ∼33% -67%
Overall (sorteer op waarde)
Vivo IQOO
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4917 Points ∼100%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
1734 Points ∼35% -65%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4595 Points ∼93% -7%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
2731 Points ∼56% -44%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
2794 Points ∼57% -43%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (3847 - 5397, n=13)
4735 Points ∼96% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 6097, n=626)
1478 Points ∼30% -70%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75)
108 Points ∼100% +8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (94 - 129, n=14)
108 Points ∼100% +8%
Vivo IQOO (Chrome 74)
100 Points ∼93%
Nokia 8.1 (Chrome 71)
72 Points ∼67% -28%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 184, n=157)
66.9 Points ∼62% -33%
Google Pixel 3a XL (Chrome 73)
62 Points ∼57% -38%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus (Chrome 73)
54 Points ∼50% -46%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75)
24534 Points ∼100% +30%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (17011 - 25640, n=14)
23124 Points ∼94% +22%
Vivo IQOO (Chrome 74)
18882 Points ∼77%
Nokia 8.1 (Chrome 71)
12717 Points ∼52% -33%
Google Pixel 3a XL (Chrome 73)
11056 Points ∼45% -41%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus (Chrome 73)
8163 Points ∼33% -57%
Average of class Smartphone (894 - 49388, n=684)
6701 Points ∼27% -65%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (571 - 59466, n=709)
10602 ms * ∼100% -306%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus (Chrome 73)
4739 ms * ∼45% -82%
Google Pixel 3a XL (Chrome 73)
3360.7 ms * ∼32% -29%
Nokia 8.1 (Chrome 71)
3034.9 ms * ∼29% -16%
Vivo IQOO (Chrome 74)
2610.5 ms * ∼25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (1852 - 2611, n=13)
2133 ms * ∼20% +18%
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75)
1873.2 ms * ∼18% +28%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75)
110.54 Points ∼100% +22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (90.8 - 118, n=11)
109 Points ∼99% +20%
Vivo IQOO (Chrome 74)
90.763 Points ∼82%
Nokia 8.1 (Chrome 71)
66.048 Points ∼60% -27%
Google Pixel 3a XL (Chrome 73)
57.573 Points ∼52% -37%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 302, n=525)
41.4 Points ∼37% -54%

* ... kleiner is beter

Vivo IQOOSony Xperia 10 PlusXiaomi Mi 9Nokia 8.1Google Pixel 3a XLAverage 128 GB UFS 2.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-36%
154%
-46%
32%
56%
-51%
Random Write 4KB
26.2
16.77
-36%
165.32
531%
7.3
-72%
86.96
232%
86.8 (18.2 - 250, n=39)
231%
21.5 (0.14 - 250, n=734)
-18%
Random Read 4KB
147.46
77.67
-47%
149.36
1%
69.9
-53%
92.12
-38%
139 (98.9 - 158, n=39)
-6%
46.5 (1.59 - 196, n=734)
-68%
Sequential Write 256KB
194.16
205.19
6%
388.27
100%
203.8
5%
179.09
-8%
205 (182 - 503, n=39)
6%
95.4 (2.99 - 590, n=734)
-51%
Sequential Read 256KB
794.73
280.34
-65%
666.06
-16%
279.3
-65%
315.6
-60%
751 (427 - 912, n=39)
-6%
269 (12.1 - 1504, n=734)
-66%
Max. Belasting
 44.7 °C41.7 °C39.2 °C 
 44.5 °C42.3 °C39.3 °C 
 44 °C41.5 °C39.3 °C 
Maximum: 44.7 °C
Gemiddelde: 41.8 °C
33.8 °C37.5 °C40.5 °C
34.5 °C37.5 °C40.7 °C
35.2 °C38.8 °C39.9 °C
Maximum: 40.7 °C
Gemiddelde: 37.6 °C
Stroomadapter (max.)  45.3 °C | Kamertemperatuur 21.3 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 41.8 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 33.1 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.7 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 35.5 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.7 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 34.1 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 32.3 °C / 90 F, compared to the device average of 33.1 °C / 92 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2047.140.12541.339.33136.833.94043.343.15042.3506332.135.98026.92610024.423.612523.427.216021.840.320019.949.425019.955.331519.759.740019.161.350020.663.863019.165.980017.568.6100017.266.5125016.965.8160017.269.1200016.973.5250016.472.931501568.2400014.365.650001467.2630013.968.180001467.7100001470.61250013.954.9160001443.7SPL61.228.881N141.149.8median 17.2median 65.8Delta2.68.139.432.928.325.418.726.526.725.933.229.422.622.721.822.224.43123.839.218.550.417.149.117.853.815.556.114.162.51467.913.869.114.773.515.47715.276.614.376.514.574.913.971.714.675.914.178.114.374.314.574.614.875.714.87514.864.41558.226.887.10.871.4median 14.8median 71.71.510hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseVivo IQOOXiaomi Mi 9
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Vivo IQOO audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 10% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 37% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 56% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Xiaomi Mi 9 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 4% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 28% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 66% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Stroomgebruik
Uit / Standbydarklight 0 / 0.1 Watt
Inactiefdarkmidlight 1.2 / 2.2 / 2.6 Watt
Belasting midlight 4.8 / 8.5 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Vivo IQOO
4000 mAh
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
3000 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 9
3300 mAh
Nokia 8.1
3500 mAh
Google Pixel 3a XL
3700 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
22%
30%
33%
39%
15%
23%
Idle Minimum *
1.2
0.68
43%
0.67
44%
0.8
33%
0.7
42%
0.956 (0.6 - 1.96, n=13)
20%
0.877 (0.2 - 3.4, n=769)
27%
Idle Average *
2.2
2.12
4%
1.26
43%
1.5
32%
1.63
26%
1.554 (0.85 - 2.8, n=13)
29%
1.734 (0.6 - 6.2, n=768)
21%
Idle Maximum *
2.6
2.17
17%
1.29
50%
1.8
31%
1.67
36%
1.881 (1 - 2.9, n=13)
28%
2.02 (0.74 - 6.6, n=769)
22%
Load Average *
4.8
3.82
20%
3.71
23%
3.2
33%
2.64
45%
4.65 (3.64 - 5.8, n=13)
3%
4.07 (0.8 - 10.8, n=763)
15%
Load Maximum *
8.5
6.44
24%
9.3
-9%
5.4
36%
4.62
46%
9.12 (7.49 - 11.9, n=13)
-7%
5.9 (1.2 - 14.2, n=763)
31%

* ... kleiner is beter

Batterijduur
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
18h 05min
Vivo IQOO
4000 mAh
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
3000 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 9
3300 mAh
Nokia 8.1
3500 mAh
Google Pixel 3a XL
3700 mAh
Batterijduur
WiFi v1.3
1085
635
-41%
546
-50%
738
-32%
709
-35%

Pro

+ goede batterijduur
+ premium uiterlijk
+ goede prijs/prestatie-verhouding
+ fatsoenlijke camera's

Contra

- wordt erg warm
- hoog stroomverbruik
- langzaam Wi-Fi
- FunTouch OS geoptimaliseerd voor Chinese markt
-
The Vivo IQOO smartphone review. Test device courtesy of TradingShenzhen.
The Vivo IQOO smartphone review. Test device courtesy of TradingShenzhen.

Dit is de verkorte versie van het originele artikel. Het volledige, Engelse testrapport vind je hier.

De Vivo IQOO maakt zijn streven om een betaalbare game smartphone te maken waar, ondanks de tekortkomingen. Het grote en heldere beeldscherm is meeslepend, wat door Vivo gecomplementeerd wordt met een krachtige SoC. De integratie van aanraakgevoelige schouderknoppen is een leuke toevoeging, zij het niet essentieel. De Xiaomi Mi 9 weet meer uit de Snapdragon 855 te halen dan de IQOO, maar ons testmodel kan alle moderne en complexe mobiele games met gemak aan.

De Vivo IQOO is een krachtige game smartphone met een fatsoenlijke set camera's, maar als je geen Chinees kunt lezen dan zul je het soms moeilijk krijgen.

Het gebruik van een 4.000 mAh batterij is een goede keuze, omdat de IQOO meer stroom verbruikt dan vergelijkbare smartphones. De IQOO kan een volle werkdag mee, al hoef je dankzij de snellaadondersteuning sowieso nooit lang bij een stopcontact te blijven.

De IQOO heeft verder een solide set van camera's, die bij goede lichtomstandigheden fatsoenlijke resultaten levert. Vreemd genoeg komt onze belangrijkste kritieken voort uit de sterke punten van de smartphone. Ons testmodel wordt erg warm en heeft een hoog stroomverbruik, maar dat is vaak een noodzakelijk compromis voor consistente prestaties in games. De zwakke Wi-Fi prestaties zullen sommige gamers weghouden van de smartphone, net als het slecht vertaalde OS. Samengevat is de Vivo IQOO een ingetogen game smartphone waar veel voor te zeggen is. De beperkte LTE-dekking en erg Chinese OS voorkomen dat de smartphone een echte bedreiging vormt voor de huidige top game smartphones.

Vivo IQOO - 20-06-2019 v6(old)
Mike Wobker

Behuizing
87%
Toetsenbord
67 / 75 → 89%
Aanwijsapparaat
95%
Aansluitmogelijkheden
39 / 60 → 66%
Gewicht
88%
Batterij
100%
Beeldscherm
85%
Gaming-performance
72 / 63 → 100%
Applicatie-performance
85 / 70 → 100%
Temperatuur
86%
Luidheid
100%
Audio
68 / 91 → 75%
Camera
76%
Extra punten
-1%
Gemiddelde
75%
87%
Smartphone - Gewogen Gemiddelde

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Overzichten en testrapporten over laptops en mobieltjes > Testrapporten > Kort testrapport Vivo IQOO Smartphone
Mike Wobker, 2019-06-22 (Update: 2019-06-22)