Notebookcheck

Kort testrapport Google Pixel 3a XL Smartphone

Mike Wobker, 👁 Daniel Schmidt, Andrea Grüblinger, 28-05-2019

Google's terugkeer naar de middenklasse. Google heeft tot nu toe vlaggenschip smartphones uitgebracht onder zijn Pixel-serie. De middenklasse 3a en 3a XL veranderen dit. Het uitgangspunt van deze apparaten is vlaggenschipcamera's met een beperkt budget, maar hoe goed heeft Google dit idee uitgevoerd? Lees verder om meer te weten te komen over deze telefoon.

Google Pixel 3a XL (Pixel Serie)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
Grafische kaart
Qualcomm Adreno 616
Geheugen
4096 MB 
Beeldscherm
6 inch 2:1, 2160 x 1080 pixel 402 PPI, capacitief, OLED, glimmend: ja
Opslag
64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 GB 
, 52 GB beschikbaar
Verbindingen
1 USB 2.0, Audio Verbindingen: 3.5 mm koptelefoon poort, 1 Vingerafdruklezer, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensoren: Versnellingsmeter, Active Edge, barometer, kompas,, eSIM
Netwerkmogelijkheden
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 5.0, GSM/EDGE: 850, 900, 1,800, 1,900 MHz. UMTS/HSPA+/HSDPA: Bands 1, 2, 4, 5, 8. CDMA/EVDO: BC0, BC1, BC10. 4G/LTE: Bands 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66., LTE, GPS
Afmetingen
hoogte x breedte x diepte (in mm): 8.2 x 160.1 x 76.1
Batterij
3700 mAh Lithium-Ion
Besturingssysteem
Android 9.0 Pie
Camera
Primary Camera: 12.2 MPix 1.4 μm, ƒ/1.8, 76° autofocus, dual-pixel phase detection, optische en elektronische beeldstabilisatie
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix 1.12 μm, ƒ/2.0, 84° fixed focus
Bijkomende functionaliteiten
Luidsprekers: Stereo, Toetsenbord: digitaal, USB modulaire lader, USB Type-C naar USB Type-C kabel, USB Type-A naar USB Type-C adapter, headphones (alleen voor apparaten verkocht in Australië, Frankrijk, Duitsland, India en Spanje), 24 Maanden Garantie, SAR waardes: Body – 1.19 W/kg, Head - 1.17 W/kg., fanless
Gewicht
167 g, Voeding: 81 g
Prijs
479 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Google Pixel 3a XL
Google Pixel 3a XL
Google Pixel 3a XL
Google Pixel 3a XL
Google Pixel 3a XL

Size Comparison

167 mm 73 mm 8.3 mm 180 g160.1 mm 76.1 mm 8.2 mm 167 g157.5 mm 74.67 mm 7.61 mm 173 g156.5 mm 76.5 mm 6.75 mm 156 g154.8 mm 75.8 mm 8 mm 180 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Mi 9
Adreno 640, 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
678 (min: 549, max: 725) MBit/s ∼100% +1%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Adreno 616, 670, 64 GB eMMC Flash
668 (min: 617, max: 692) MBit/s ∼99%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Adreno 509, 636, 64 GB eMMC Flash
317 (min: 163, max: 343) MBit/s ∼47% -53%
Nokia 8.1
Adreno 616, 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
312 (min: 273, max: 341) MBit/s ∼46% -53%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
Adreno 509, 636, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
232 MBit/s ∼34% -65%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 939, n=397)
220 MBit/s ∼32% -67%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Google Pixel 3a XL
Adreno 616, 670, 64 GB eMMC Flash
580 (min: 548, max: 602) MBit/s ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Adreno 640, 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
534 (min: 430, max: 578) MBit/s ∼92% -8%
Nokia 8.1
Adreno 616, 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
300 (min: 169, max: 367) MBit/s ∼52% -48%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
Adreno 509, 636, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
237 MBit/s ∼41% -59%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 703, n=397)
210 MBit/s ∼36% -64%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Adreno 509, 636, 64 GB eMMC Flash
153 (min: 133, max: 180) MBit/s ∼26% -74%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø667 (617-692)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø580 (548-602)
GPS test: Google Pixel 3a XL – Overzicht
GPS test: Google Pixel 3a XL – Overzicht
GPS test: Google Pixel 3a XL – Fietsen rond een meer
GPS test: Google Pixel 3a XL – Fietsen rond een meer
GPS test: Google Pixel 3a XL - Lus
GPS test: Google Pixel 3a XL - Lus
GPS test: Garmin Edge 500 – Overzicht
GPS test: Garmin Edge 500 – Overzicht
GPS test: Garmin Edge 500 – Fietsen rond een meer
GPS test: Garmin Edge 500 – Fietsen rond een meer
GPS test: Garmin Edge 500 - Lus
GPS test: Garmin Edge 500 - Lus

Beeldvergelijking

Bekijk een scène en navigeer binnen het eerste beeld. Eén klik wijzigt het zoomniveau. Eén klik op het ingezoomde beeld opent het origineel in een nieuw venster. Het eerste beeld toont de verschaalde foto van het testtoestel.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
klik om beelden te laden
Een foto van onze testkaart
Een foto van onze testkaart
Onze testkaart in detail
407
cd/m²
415
cd/m²
414
cd/m²
400
cd/m²
409
cd/m²
406
cd/m²
405
cd/m²
418
cd/m²
414
cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 418 cd/m² Gemiddelde: 409.8 cd/m² Minimum: 2.35 cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling: 96 %
Helderheid in Batterij-modus: 409 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Zwart: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.3 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6.1
ΔE Greyscale 1.5 | 0.64-98 Ø6.3
100% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.22
Google Pixel 3a XL
OLED, 2160x1080, 6
Xiaomi Mi 9
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.39
Nokia 8.1
IPS, 2246x1080, 6.18
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
AMOLED, 2160x1080, 6
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
IPS, 2520x1080, 6.5
Screen
22%
-102%
-158%
-170%
Brightness middle
409
593
45%
567
39%
446
9%
572
40%
Brightness
410
587
43%
547
33%
451
10%
580
41%
Brightness Distribution
96
94
-2%
92
-4%
93
-3%
96
0%
Black Level *
0.61
0.4
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
1.3
0.9
31%
4.39
-238%
6.58
-406%
4.5
-246%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
2.3
2
13%
7.28
-217%
11.94
-419%
12.2
-430%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
1.5
1.5
-0%
4.9
-227%
3.6
-140%
7.9
-427%
Gamma
2.22 99%
2.27 97%
2.248 98%
2.199 100%
2.16 102%
CCT
6621 98%
6548 99%
7642 85%
7116 91%
8726 74%
Contrast
930
1430

* ... kleiner is beter

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Om de schermhelderheid te verlagen schakelen sommige laptops het backlight erg snel aan en uit. Dit gebeurt aan een dergelijk hoge frequentie dat het niet zichtbaar is voor het menselijk oog. Als de frequentie te laag is kunnen personen met gevoelige ogen geïrriteerd geraken, hoofdpijn krijgen en zelfs flickering waarnemen.
Screen flickering / PWM waargenomen 242.7 Hz ≤ 99 % helderheid instelling

Het backlight van het scherm flikkert aan 242.7 Hz (hoogstwaarschijnlijk met PWM - Pulse-Width Modulation) aan een helderheid van 99 % en lager. Boven deze helderheid zou er geen flickering / PWM mogen optreden.

De frequentie van 242.7 Hz is redelijk laag en de meeste mensen die gevoelig zijn aan flickering kunnen dit dus waarnemen of geïrriteerde ogen krijgen (gebruikmakend van de vermelde helderheid en lager).

Ter vergelijking: 51 % van alle geteste toestellen maakten geen gebruik van PWM om de schermhelderheid te verlagen. Als het wel werd gebruikt, werd een gemiddelde van 9524 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz waargenomen.

Responstijd Scherm

De responstijden van het scherm tonen hoe snel het scherm in staat is om van één kleur naar de andere te veranderen. Trage responstijden kunnen aanleiding geven tot 'nabeelden' rond bewegende objecten of het scherm wazig maken (blur). Vooral spelers van snelle 3D-games hebben baat bij een scherm met snelle responstijden.
       Responstijd Zwart naar Wit
2.8 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd↗ 1.6 ms stijging
↘ 1.2 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde erg snelle responstijden in onze tests en zou zeer geschikt moeten zijn voor snelle games.
Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.8 (minimum) tot 240 (maximum) ms. » 0 % van alle toestellen zijn beter.
Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd beter is dan het gemiddelde (25.3 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.
       Responstijd 50% Grijs naar 80% Grijs
3.6 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd↗ 2 ms stijging
↘ 1.6 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde erg snelle responstijden in onze tests en zou zeer geschikt moeten zijn voor snelle games.
Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.9 (minimum) tot 636 (maximum) ms. » 0 % van alle toestellen zijn beter.
Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd beter is dan het gemiddelde (40.4 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.
Geekbench 4.3
Compute RenderScript Score (sorteer op waarde)
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
6479 Points ∼87%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7482 Points ∼100% +15%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
6813 Points ∼91% +5%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
4501 Points ∼60% -31%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
4278 Points ∼57% -34%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
5542 Points ∼74% -14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
  (6090 - 6479, n=2)
6285 Points ∼84% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (663 - 21070, n=299)
4513 Points ∼60% -30%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sorteer op waarde)
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
5172 Points ∼47%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
10999 Points ∼100% +113%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
5856 Points ∼53% +13%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
4941 Points ∼45% -4%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
4804 Points ∼44% -7%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
5826 Points ∼53% +13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
  (5172 - 5742, n=2)
5457 Points ∼50% +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1174 - 11598, n=353)
4479 Points ∼41% -13%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sorteer op waarde)
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
1616 Points ∼46%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3523 Points ∼100% +118%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
1799 Points ∼51% +11%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
1330 Points ∼38% -18%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
1346 Points ∼38% -17%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
1601 Points ∼45% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
  (1616 - 1712, n=2)
1664 Points ∼47% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (758 - 4824, n=355)
1325 Points ∼38% -18%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sorteer op waarde)
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
7377 Points ∼82%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9035 Points ∼100% +22%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
6887 Points ∼76% -7%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
5640 Points ∼62% -24%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
6018 Points ∼67% -18%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
5789 Points ∼64% -22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
  (6698 - 7377, n=2)
7038 Points ∼78% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3227 - 11440, n=349)
4937 Points ∼55% -33%
Work performance score (sorteer op waarde)
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
9397 Points ∼86%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
10985 Points ∼100% +17%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
8309 Points ∼76% -12%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
6457 Points ∼59% -31%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
7181 Points ∼65% -24%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
6338 Points ∼58% -33%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
  (8126 - 9397, n=2)
8762 Points ∼80% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4096 - 14439, n=517)
5401 Points ∼49% -43%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
2314 Points ∼70%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3288 Points ∼100% +42%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
2282 Points ∼69% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
  (2288 - 2314, n=2)
2301 Points ∼70% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1849 - 15735, n=37)
2434 Points ∼74% +5%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
1416 Points ∼25%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5723 Points ∼100% +304%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
809 Points ∼14% -43%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
  (1408 - 1416, n=2)
1412 Points ∼25% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (209 - 14536, n=37)
2303 Points ∼40% +63%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sorteer op waarde)
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
1550 Points ∼32%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4914 Points ∼100% +217%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
944 Points ∼19% -39%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
  (1540 - 1550, n=2)
1545 Points ∼31% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (260 - 14786, n=40)
1997 Points ∼41% +29%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
2532 Points ∼67%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3754 Points ∼100% +48%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
2534 Points ∼68% 0%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
2384 Points ∼64% -6%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
2345 Points ∼62% -7%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
2774 Points ∼74% +10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
  (2424 - 2532, n=2)
2478 Points ∼66% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 4535, n=363)
1813 Points ∼48% -28%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
1612 Points ∼23%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7076 Points ∼100% +339%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
1845 Points ∼26% +14%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
865 Points ∼12% -46%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
862 Points ∼12% -47%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
1268 Points ∼18% -21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
  (1612 - 1612, n=2)
1612 Points ∼23% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (76 - 8206, n=363)
1548 Points ∼22% -4%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sorteer op waarde)
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
1754 Points ∼30%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5913 Points ∼100% +237%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
1964 Points ∼33% +12%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
1008 Points ∼17% -43%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
1003 Points ∼17% -43%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
1433 Points ∼24% -18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
  (1742 - 1754, n=2)
1748 Points ∼30% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (94 - 6312, n=366)
1445 Points ∼24% -18%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
2495 Points ∼66%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3788 Points ∼100% +52%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
2516 Points ∼66% +1%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
2384 Points ∼63% -4%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
2352 Points ∼62% -6%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
2645 Points ∼70% +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
  (2413 - 2495, n=2)
2454 Points ∼65% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 4493, n=377)
1782 Points ∼47% -29%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
2537 Points ∼25%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
10291 Points ∼100% +306%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
2855 Points ∼28% +13%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
1400 Points ∼14% -45%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
1397 Points ∼14% -45%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
1757 Points ∼17% -31%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
  (2534 - 2537, n=2)
2536 Points ∼25% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (131 - 14951, n=377)
2118 Points ∼21% -17%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sorteer op waarde)
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
2528 Points ∼34%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7449 Points ∼100% +195%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
2772 Points ∼37% +10%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
1541 Points ∼21% -39%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
1536 Points ∼21% -39%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
1898 Points ∼25% -25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
  (2506 - 2528, n=2)
2517 Points ∼34% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (159 - 7980, n=378)
1805 Points ∼24% -29%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
2466 Points ∼66%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3758 Points ∼100% +52%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
2514 Points ∼67% +2%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
2327 Points ∼62% -6%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
2351 Points ∼63% -5%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
2073 Points ∼55% -16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
  (2436 - 2466, n=2)
2451 Points ∼65% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (486 - 4262, n=439)
1740 Points ∼46% -29%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
1487 Points ∼23%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
6355 Points ∼100% +327%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
1702 Points ∼27% +14%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
815 Points ∼13% -45%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
808 Points ∼13% -46%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
1185 Points ∼19% -20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
  (1451 - 1487, n=2)
1469 Points ∼23% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (65 - 6362, n=441)
1280 Points ∼20% -14%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sorteer op waarde)
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
1631 Points ∼30%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5509 Points ∼100% +238%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
1834 Points ∼33% +12%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
953 Points ∼17% -42%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
946 Points ∼17% -42%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
1354 Points ∼25% -17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
  (1594 - 1631, n=2)
1613 Points ∼29% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (80 - 5734, n=449)
1225 Points ∼22% -25%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
2489 Points ∼69%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3614 Points ∼100% +45%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
2467 Points ∼68% -1%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
2337 Points ∼65% -6%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
2349 Points ∼65% -6%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
2741 Points ∼76% +10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
  (2456 - 2489, n=2)
2473 Points ∼68% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (512 - 4240, n=471)
1645 Points ∼46% -34%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
2428 Points ∼24%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9963 Points ∼100% +310%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
2763 Points ∼28% +14%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
1333 Points ∼13% -45%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
1327 Points ∼13% -45%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
1918 Points ∼19% -21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
  (2357 - 2428, n=2)
2393 Points ∼24% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 10008, n=471)
1735 Points ∼17% -29%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sorteer op waarde)
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
2441 Points ∼34%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7166 Points ∼100% +194%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
2691 Points ∼38% +10%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
1474 Points ∼21% -40%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
1469 Points ∼20% -40%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
2054 Points ∼29% -16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
  (2378 - 2441, n=2)
2410 Points ∼34% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 7673, n=479)
1491 Points ∼21% -39%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
14631 Points ∼58%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
25339 Points ∼100% +73%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
14820 Points ∼58% +1%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
16939 Points ∼67% +16%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
18523 Points ∼73% +27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
  (13055 - 14631, n=2)
13843 Points ∼55% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4811 - 45072, n=631)
13525 Points ∼53% -8%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sorteer op waarde)
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
35596 Points ∼33%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
106534 Points ∼100% +199%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
39655 Points ∼37% +11%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
20908 Points ∼20% -41%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
29065 Points ∼27% -18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
  (22381 - 35596, n=2)
28989 Points ∼27% -19%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3585 - 162695, n=631)
19546 Points ∼18% -45%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sorteer op waarde)
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
26999 Points ∼43%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
62225 Points ∼100% +130%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
28895 Points ∼46% +7%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
19873 Points ∼32% -26%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
25783 Points ∼41% -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
  (19315 - 26999, n=2)
23157 Points ∼37% -14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4164 - 83518, n=632)
16333 Points ∼26% -40%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sorteer op waarde)
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
58 fps ∼35%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
167 fps ∼100% +188%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
65 fps ∼39% +12%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
36 fps ∼22% -38%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
35 fps ∼21% -40%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
46 fps ∼28% -21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
  (46 - 58, n=2)
52 fps ∼31% -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (6 - 251, n=659)
34.1 fps ∼20% -41%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sorteer op waarde)
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
53 fps ∼88%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
60 fps ∼100% +13%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
57 fps ∼95% +8%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
35 fps ∼58% -34%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
30 fps ∼50% -43%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
50 fps ∼83% -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
  (32 - 53, n=2)
42.5 fps ∼71% -20%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.8 - 120, n=662)
26.5 fps ∼44% -50%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sorteer op waarde)
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
29 fps ∼29%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
100 fps ∼100% +245%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
32 fps ∼32% +10%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
16 fps ∼16% -45%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
16 fps ∼16% -45%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
23 fps ∼23% -21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
  (29 - 29, n=2)
29 fps ∼29% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.7 - 132, n=578)
18.7 fps ∼19% -36%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sorteer op waarde)
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
28 fps ∼47%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
60 fps ∼100% +114%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
31 fps ∼52% +11%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
15 fps ∼25% -46%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
13 fps ∼22% -54%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
21 fps ∼35% -25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
  (17 - 28, n=2)
22.5 fps ∼38% -20%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.4 - 115, n=583)
17.4 fps ∼29% -38%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
20 fps ∼29%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
69 fps ∼100% +245%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
23 fps ∼33% +15%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
10 fps ∼14% -50%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
10 fps ∼14% -50%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
15 fps ∼22% -25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
  (19 - 20, n=2)
19.5 fps ∼28% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.6 - 88, n=440)
15.5 fps ∼22% -22%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
19 fps ∼33%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
58 fps ∼100% +205%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
22 fps ∼38% +16%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
9.8 fps ∼17% -48%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
8.4 fps ∼14% -56%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
14 fps ∼24% -26%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
  (6.9 - 19, n=2)
13 fps ∼22% -32%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.4 - 110, n=443)
14.8 fps ∼26% -22%
GFXBench
High Tier Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
7.2 fps ∼30%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
24 fps ∼100% +233%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
8.2 fps ∼34% +14%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
3.2 fps ∼13% -56%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
3 fps ∼13% -58%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
  (4.3 - 7.2, n=2)
5.75 fps ∼24% -20%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.86 - 59, n=143)
8.76 fps ∼37% +22%
2560x1440 High Tier Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
4.5 fps ∼28%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
16 fps ∼100% +256%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
5 fps ∼31% +11%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
2.2 fps ∼14% -51%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
4.8 fps ∼30% +7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
  (4.4 - 4.5, n=2)
4.45 fps ∼28% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.26 - 31, n=143)
5.99 fps ∼37% +33%
Normal Tier Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
11 fps ∼30%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
37 fps ∼100% +236%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
13 fps ∼35% +18%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
4.9 fps ∼13% -55%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
7.5 fps ∼20% -32%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
  (6.8 - 11, n=2)
8.9 fps ∼24% -19%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.8 - 59, n=145)
13 fps ∼35% +18%
1920x1080 Normal Tier Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
12 fps ∼29%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
41 fps ∼100% +242%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
14 fps ∼34% +17%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
6.1 fps ∼15% -49%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
8.6 fps ∼21% -28%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
  (12 - 12, n=2)
12 fps ∼29% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.94 - 63, n=144)
14.4 fps ∼35% +20%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
11 fps ∼26%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
42 fps ∼100% +282%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
13 fps ∼31% +18%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
6.3 fps ∼15% -43%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
6.3 fps ∼15% -43%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
9.1 fps ∼22% -17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
  (8.5 - 11, n=2)
9.75 fps ∼23% -11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.89 - 54, n=369)
10.4 fps ∼25% -5%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
11 fps ∼29%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
38 fps ∼100% +245%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
12 fps ∼32% +9%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
6 fps ∼16% -45%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
5.1 fps ∼13% -54%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
8.3 fps ∼22% -25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
  (6.4 - 11, n=2)
8.7 fps ∼23% -21%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.6 - 58, n=373)
9.41 fps ∼25% -14%
Basemark GPU
1920x1080 OpenGL Medium Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
13.79 fps ∼37%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
37.41 fps ∼100% +171%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
14.3 fps ∼38% +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
  (13.1 - 13.8, n=2)
13.4 fps ∼36% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.09 - 651, n=60)
25.9 fps ∼69% +88%
Vulkan Medium Native (sorteer op waarde)
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
11.62 fps ∼36%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
32.2 fps ∼100% +177%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
12.1 fps ∼38% +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
  (7.67 - 11.6, n=2)
9.65 fps ∼30% -17%
Average of class Smartphone
  (6.62 - 606, n=55)
23 fps ∼71% +98%
1920x1080 Vulkan Medium Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
12.45 fps ∼35%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
35.63 fps ∼100% +186%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
13 fps ∼36% +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
  (12 - 12.5, n=2)
12.2 fps ∼34% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0 - 739, n=55)
27.6 fps ∼77% +122%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sorteer op waarde)
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
158868 Points ∼42%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
374820 Points ∼100% +136%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
169262 Points ∼45% +7%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
115656 Points ∼31% -27%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
117574 Points ∼31% -26%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
140878 Points ∼38% -11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
  (156772 - 158868, n=2)
157820 Points ∼42% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (52607 - 380913, n=260)
127050 Points ∼34% -20%
VRMark - Amber Room (sorteer op waarde)
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
1473 Score ∼30%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4964 Score ∼100% +237%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
1681 Score ∼34% +14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
  (1423 - 1473, n=2)
1448 Score ∼29% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (552 - 5025, n=57)
1909 Score ∼38% +30%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sorteer op waarde)
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
1186 Points ∼86%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
1378 Points ∼100% +16%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
1077 Points ∼78% -9%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
1052 Points ∼76% -11%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
1046 Points ∼76% -12%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
1105 Points ∼80% -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
  (1144 - 1186, n=2)
1165 Points ∼85% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7 - 1731, n=590)
734 Points ∼53% -38%
Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
2815 Points ∼30%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9270 Points ∼100% +229%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
3086 Points ∼33% +10%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
1625 Points ∼18% -42%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
1611 Points ∼17% -43%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
2332 Points ∼25% -17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
  (2815 - 2816, n=2)
2816 Points ∼30% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (18 - 15969, n=590)
1889 Points ∼20% -33%
Memory (sorteer op waarde)
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
3316 Points ∼82%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4031 Points ∼100% +22%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
2947 Points ∼73% -11%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
2208 Points ∼55% -33%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
1236 Points ∼31% -63%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
2393 Points ∼59% -28%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
  (2894 - 3316, n=2)
3105 Points ∼77% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (21 - 6661, n=590)
1413 Points ∼35% -57%
System (sorteer op waarde)
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
5507 Points ∼65%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
8441 Points ∼100% +53%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
5681 Points ∼67% +3%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
4628 Points ∼55% -16%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
4342 Points ∼51% -21%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
5063 Points ∼60% -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
  (5315 - 5507, n=2)
5411 Points ∼64% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (369 - 12202, n=590)
2799 Points ∼33% -49%
Overall (sorteer op waarde)
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
2794 Points ∼61%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4595 Points ∼100% +64%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
2731 Points ∼59% -2%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
2044 Points ∼44% -27%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
1734 Points ∼38% -38%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
2364 Points ∼51% -15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
  (2653 - 2794, n=2)
2724 Points ∼59% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (150 - 6097, n=594)
1389 Points ∼30% -50%
Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sorteer op waarde)
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
447 Points ∼32%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
1415 Points ∼100% +217%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
482 Points ∼34% +8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
  (444 - 447, n=2)
446 Points ∼32% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (35 - 2754, n=98)
701 Points ∼50% +57%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73)
57.207 Points ∼100% +78%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (32.1 - 33.6, n=2)
32.8 Points ∼57% +2%
Google Pixel 3a XL (Chrome 73)
32.083 Points ∼56%
Average of class Smartphone (14.7 - 108, n=70)
29 Points ∼51% -10%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus (Chrome 73)
25.96 Points ∼45% -19%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75)
65.7 runs/min ∼100% +102%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (32.5 - 33.7, n=2)
33.1 runs/min ∼50% +2%
Average of class Smartphone (6.42 - 123, n=64)
33 runs/min ∼50% +2%
Google Pixel 3a XL (Chrome 73)
32.5 runs/min ∼49%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus (Chrome 73)
27.4 runs/min ∼42% -16%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75)
108 Points ∼100% +74%
Nokia 8.1 (Chrome 71)
72 Points ∼67% +16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (62 - 66, n=2)
64 Points ∼59% +3%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 161, n=125)
62.4 Points ∼58% +1%
Google Pixel 3a XL (Chrome 73)
62 Points ∼57%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 (Chrome 70)
59 Points ∼55% -5%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play (Chrome 67)
55 Points ∼51% -11%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus (Chrome 73)
54 Points ∼50% -13%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75)
24534 Points ∼100% +122%
Nokia 8.1 (Chrome 71)
12717 Points ∼52% +15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (11056 - 11312, n=2)
11184 Points ∼46% +1%
Google Pixel 3a XL (Chrome 73)
11056 Points ∼45%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 (Chrome 70)
10145 Points ∼41% -8%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play (Chrome 67)
8519 Points ∼35% -23%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus (Chrome 73)
8163 Points ∼33% -26%
Average of class Smartphone (1994 - 43280, n=652)
6115 Points ∼25% -45%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (603 - 59466, n=672)
10898 ms * ∼100% -224%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play (Chrome 67)
4820 ms * ∼44% -43%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus (Chrome 73)
4739 ms * ∼43% -41%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 (Chrome 70)
3841.8 (min: 1) ms * ∼35% -14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (3361 - 3496, n=2)
3429 ms * ∼31% -2%
Google Pixel 3a XL (Chrome 73)
3360.7 ms * ∼31%
Nokia 8.1 (Chrome 71)
3034.9 ms * ∼28% +10%
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75)
1873.2 ms * ∼17% +44%

* ... kleiner is beter

Google Pixel 3a XLXiaomi Mi 9Nokia 8.1Motorola Moto Z3 PlaySony Xperia 10 PlusAverage 64 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
95%
-29%
-12%
-23%
-33%
-50%
Random Write 4KB
86.96
165.32
90%
7.3
-92%
84.1
-3%
16.77
-81%
24.5 (3.4 - 88.2, n=108)
-72%
19.3 (0.14 - 250, n=701)
-78%
Random Read 4KB
92.12
149.36
62%
69.9
-24%
60.6
-34%
77.67
-16%
54.6 (11.4 - 149, n=108)
-41%
43.9 (1.59 - 175, n=701)
-52%
Sequential Write 256KB
179.09
388.27
117%
203.8
14%
182.5
2%
205.19
15%
172 (40 - 246, n=108)
-4%
90.4 (2.99 - 392, n=701)
-50%
Sequential Read 256KB
315.6
666.06
111%
279.3
-12%
271.7
-14%
280.34
-11%
274 (115 - 704, n=108)
-13%
255 (12.1 - 1468, n=701)
-19%
PUBG Compare
01020304050Tooltip
; Smooth: Ø39.5 (11-41)
; HD: Ø29.9 (28-31)
Arena of Valor
0102030405060Tooltip
; min: Ø59.6 (50-60)
; high HD: Ø56 (36-60)
Shadow Fight 3
0102030405060Tooltip
; high: Ø59.4 (51-60)
; minimal: Ø59.4 (50-60)
Max. Belasting
 36.4 °C34.2 °C31.6 °C 
 36.3 °C34.6 °C31.4 °C 
 34.2 °C34.4 °C31.1 °C 
Maximum: 36.4 °C
Gemiddelde: 33.8 °C
32.4 °C32.3 °C35.7 °C
30.8 °C32.4 °C36.2 °C
30 °C32.5 °C34.8 °C
Maximum: 36.2 °C
Gemiddelde: 33 °C
Stroomadapter (max.)  27.9 °C | Kamertemperatuur 21.3 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 33.8 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 33.1 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 36.4 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 35.6 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 36.2 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 34.1 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.9 °C / 88 F, compared to the device average of 33.1 °C / 92 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2037.134.32527.4333125.524.44024.527.55036.135.46326.1278024.322.610022.129.612519.136.616020.253.220019.452.425016.553.531515.156.740015.3575001461.463014.567.88001467.9100014.571.2125014.570.7160014.371.1200014.668.325001470.3315014.769.1400014.367.2500014.860.2630014.666.4800014.473.91000014.677.31250014.774.1160001566.9SPL26.782.2N0.853.2median 14.6median 67.2Delta1.57.339.432.928.325.418.726.526.725.933.229.422.622.721.822.224.43123.839.218.550.417.149.117.853.815.556.114.162.51467.913.869.114.773.515.47715.276.614.376.514.574.913.971.714.675.914.178.114.374.314.574.614.875.714.87514.864.41558.226.887.10.871.4median 14.8median 71.71.510hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseGoogle Pixel 3a XLXiaomi Mi 9
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Google Pixel 3a XL audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.2% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 17% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 79% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Xiaomi Mi 9 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 28% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 66% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Stroomgebruik
Uit / Standbydarklight 0.01 / 0.27 Watt
Inactiefdarkmidlight 0.7 / 1.63 / 1.67 Watt
Belasting midlight 2.64 / 4.62 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Google Pixel 3a XL
3700 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 9
3300 mAh
Nokia 8.1
3500 mAh
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
3000 mAh
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
3000 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-18%
-10%
-44%
-28%
-55%
-27%
Idle Minimum *
0.7
0.67
4%
0.8
-14%
1.3
-86%
0.68
3%
1.385 (0.7 - 2.07, n=2)
-98%
0.882 (0.2 - 3.4, n=728)
-26%
Idle Average *
1.63
1.26
23%
1.5
8%
2
-23%
2.12
-30%
2.79 (1.63 - 3.94, n=2)
-71%
1.737 (0.6 - 6.2, n=727)
-7%
Idle Maximum *
1.67
1.29
23%
1.8
-8%
2.7
-62%
2.17
-30%
2.82 (1.67 - 3.96, n=2)
-69%
2.02 (0.74 - 6.6, n=728)
-21%
Load Average *
2.64
3.71
-41%
3.2
-21%
3.7
-40%
3.82
-45%
3.36 (2.64 - 4.07, n=2)
-27%
4.07 (0.8 - 10.8, n=722)
-54%
Load Maximum *
4.62
9.3
-101%
5.4
-17%
5.1
-10%
6.44
-39%
5.18 (4.62 - 5.73, n=2)
-12%
5.87 (1.2 - 14.2, n=722)
-27%

* ... kleiner is beter

Batterijduur
Inactief (zonder WLAN, minimale helderheid)
30h 22min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
11h 49min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
16h 00min
Belast (maximale helderheid)
4h 49min
Google Pixel 3a XL
3700 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 9
3300 mAh
Nokia 8.1
3500 mAh
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
3000 mAh
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
3000 mAh
Batterijduur
-15%
-8%
-28%
-27%
Reader / Idle
1822
1650
-9%
1682
-8%
1245
-32%
1400
-23%
H.264
960
1008
5%
857
-11%
648
-32%
701
-27%
WiFi v1.3
709
546
-23%
738
4%
595
-16%
635
-10%
Load
289
194
-33%
246
-15%
199
-31%
154
-47%

Pro

+ goed gebouwd
+ goede camera's
+ pure Android Pie
+ geen prestatiebeperking, zelfs niet bij langdurige belasting
+ goede luidsprekers
+ relatief goede batterijlevensduur

Contra

- grote schermranden
- Active Edge kan niet worden aangepast
- geen microSD-kaartlezer
- batterijlevensduur voldoet niet aan de verwachtingen
De Google Pixel 3a XL smartphone. Testmodel geleverd door Google Germany.
De Google Pixel 3a XL smartphone. Testmodel geleverd door Google Germany.

Voor het volledige, Engelse testrapport, klik hier.

De Pixel 3a XL laat zien dat Google niet is vergeten hoe een uitstekende middenklasse smartphone in elkaar zit. Het uiterlijk van de 3a XL is op geen enkele manier inferieur aan die van Google's duurdere modellen, terwijl de mindere hardware nog steeds soepele prestaties levert en gemakkelijk veeleisende toepassingen aankan. Hoewel we de opkomst van triple- en quad-camera's aan de achterkant in middenklasse smartphones hebben gezien, weet Google zijn rivalen te schande te maken met zijn enkele 12,2 MP-sensor.

De Google Pixel 3a XL is een nieuwe middenmotor die in veel opzichten uitblinkt. Er zijn enkele kleine tekortkomingen, maar deze voorkomen niet dat het apparaat een fantastische prijs/kwaliteitsverhouding biedt.

Helaas neemt de 3a XL ook enkele van de kritieken over die we van andere Pixel-smartphones hadden. Het ontbreken van de juiste dual-SIM-functionaliteit is een vergissing, net als de beslissing van Google om geen ​​microSD-kaartlezer te integreren. De dikke beeldschermranden en de kunststof behuizing laten ons met gemengde gevoelens achter, hoewel ze hun voordelen hebben: geen inkeping. Het besluit om te kiezen voor een Snapdragon 670 SoC in plaats van een krachtigere chip heeft ook kritiek opgeleverd in andere reviews. De Snapdragon 670 biedt echter geen praktische beperkingen en kan bijna elke app of game uitvoeren die je kan bedenken.

Over het algemeen is de Pixel 3a XL een uitzonderlijke middenklasse smartphone met een betere camera en batterijduur dan zijn concurrenten. Het apparaat is ook goed ontworpen en de meeste zwakke punten zijn een kwestie van smaak.

 

 

Google Pixel 3a XL - 27-05-2019 v6
Mike Wobker

Behuizing
84%
Toetsenbord
65 / 75 → 87%
Aanwijsapparaat
94%
Aansluitmogelijkheden
46 / 60 → 76%
Gewicht
91%
Batterij
96%
Beeldscherm
90%
Gaming-performance
56 / 63 → 89%
Applicatie-performance
66 / 70 → 94%
Temperatuur
91%
Luidheid
100%
Audio
71 / 91 → 78%
Camera
85%
Gemiddelde
80%
89%
Smartphone - Gewogen Gemiddelde

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Overzichten en testrapporten over laptops en mobieltjes > Testrapporten > Kort testrapport Google Pixel 3a XL Smartphone
Mike Wobker, 2019-05-28 (Update: 2019-05-28)