Notebookcheck

Kort testrapport Google Pixel 3 Smartphone

Mike Wobker, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (vertaald door Siemon Boes), 29-11-2018

Geen vlaggenschip. De Google Pixel 3 is een dure smartphone die verkocht wordt voor ongeveer 800 euro. Het toestel moet zich echter meten ten opzichte van vergelijkbaar uitgeruste, maar veel goedkopere concurrenten. Kom in ons testrapport te weten of Google de problemen met de Pixel 2 heeft rechtgezet en hoe het nieuwe vlaggenschip het ervan afbrengt.

Google Pixel 3 (Pixel Serie)
Grafische kaart
Geheugen
4096 MB 
Beeldscherm
5.5 inch 2:1, 2160 x 1080 pixel 439 PPI, Capacitief, OLED, Corning Gorilla Glass 5, glimmend: ja
Opslag
64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 64 GB 
, 52 GB beschikbaar
Verbindingen
1 USB 3.0, Audio Verbindingen: USB Type-C, 1 Vingerafdruklezer, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensoren: Accelerometer, Barometer, Gyroscoop, Magnetometer, USB Type-C, eSIM
Netwerkmogelijkheden
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 5.0, GSM: 850, 900, 1,800, 1900 MHz. CDMA: BC0, BC1, BC10. WCDMA: W1, W2. LTE/FDD: B1, B2, B3, B4, B5, B7, B8, B12, B13, B17, B18, B19, B20, B25, B26, B28, B29, B32, B66, B71. LTE TD: B38, B39, B40, B41, B42, B46., LTE, GPS
Afmetingen
hoogte x breedte x diepte (in mm): 7.9 x 145.6 x 68.2
Batterij
2915 mAh Lithium-Ion, Qi draadloos opladen
Besturingssysteem
Android 9.0 Pie
Camera
Primary Camera: 12 MPix ,1.4μm, f/1.8
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix Dual: 8MP (f/2.2) & 8MP (f/1.8)
Bijkomende functionaliteiten
Luidsprekers: Stereo-luidsprekers, Toetsenbord: Virtueel, Toetsenbordverlichting: ja, Quick-oplader, USB Type-C-kabel, Pixel USB Type-C Headphones, USB Type-C-naar-3.5mm-adapter, USB Type-C-naar-Type-A-adapter, SIM-tool, 24 Maanden Garantie, SAR-waarde: hoofd - 1.33 W/kg, lichaam - 1.49 W/kg, fanless
Gewicht
148 g, Voeding: 82 g
Prijs
850 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Google Pixel 3
Google Pixel 3
Google Pixel 3
Google Pixel 3
Google Pixel 3
Google Pixel 3

Formaat Vergelijking

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Google Pixel 3
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
659 (min: 610, max: 698) MBit/s ∼100%
Apple iPhone XS
A12 Bionic GPU, A12 Bionic, Apple 512 GB (iPhone Xs)
650 MBit/s ∼99% -1%
Huawei P20 Pro
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
635 MBit/s ∼96% -4%
Sony Xperia XZ3
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
624 (min: 593, max: 636) MBit/s ∼95% -5%
HTC U12 Plus
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
579 MBit/s ∼88% -12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 939, n=306)
211 MBit/s ∼32% -68%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Google Pixel 3
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
591 (min: 461, max: 651) MBit/s ∼100%
Apple iPhone XS
A12 Bionic GPU, A12 Bionic, Apple 512 GB (iPhone Xs)
587 MBit/s ∼99% -1%
HTC U12 Plus
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
573 MBit/s ∼97% -3%
Sony Xperia XZ3
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
484 (min: 382, max: 499) MBit/s ∼82% -18%
Huawei P20 Pro
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
437 MBit/s ∼74% -26%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 703, n=306)
206 MBit/s ∼35% -65%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø658 (610-698)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø591 (461-651)
GPS-test: Google Pixel 3 - Overzicht
GPS-test: Google Pixel 3 - Overzicht
GPS-test: Google Pixel 3 – Fietsen rond een meer
GPS-test: Google Pixel 3 – Fietsen rond een meer
GPS-test: Google Pixel 3 - Lus
GPS-test: Google Pixel 3 - Lus
GPS-test: Garmin Edge 500 - Overzicht
GPS-test: Garmin Edge 500 - Overzicht
GPS-test: Garmin Edge 500 - Fietsen rond een meer
GPS-test: Garmin Edge 500 - Fietsen rond een meer
GPS-test: Garmin Edge 500 - Lus
GPS-test: Garmin Edge 500 - Lus

Beeldvergelijking

Bekijk een scène en navigeer binnen het eerste beeld. Eén klik wijzigt het zoomniveau. Eén klik op het ingezoomde beeld opent het origineel in een nieuw venster. Het eerste beeld toont de verschaalde foto van het testtoestel.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
klik om beelden te laden
Een foto van ons testbeeld
Een foto van ons testbeeld
Ons testbeeld in detail
383
cd/m²
394
cd/m²
418
cd/m²
383
cd/m²
393
cd/m²
420
cd/m²
383
cd/m²
394
cd/m²
416
cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 420 cd/m² Gemiddelde: 398.2 cd/m² Minimum: 2.46 cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling: 91 %
Helderheid in Batterij-modus: 393 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Zwart: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.4 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.2
ΔE Greyscale 1.2 | 0.64-98 Ø6.5
99.6% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.19
Google Pixel 3
OLED, 2160x1080, 5.5
Huawei P20 Pro
OLED, 2240x1080, 6.1
Apple iPhone XS
OLED, 2436x1125, 5.8
Sony Xperia XZ3
OLED, 2880x1440, 6
HTC U12 Plus
Super LCD 6, 2880x1440, 6
Screen
14%
14%
-155%
-7%
Brightness middle
393
569
45%
639
63%
543
38%
395
1%
Brightness
398
578
45%
637
60%
542
36%
402
1%
Brightness Distribution
91
95
4%
94
3%
92
1%
90
-1%
Black Level *
0.37
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
1.4
1.3
7%
1
29%
6.6
-371%
1.6
-14%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
2.5
2.1
16%
2.2
12%
11
-340%
3.4
-36%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
1.2
1.6
-33%
2.2
-83%
4.7
-292%
1.1
8%
Gamma
2.19 100%
2.31 95%
1.9 116%
1.835 120%
2.14 103%
CCT
6597 99%
6401 102%
6364 102%
6817 95%
6536 99%
Contrast
1068

* ... kleiner is beter

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Om de schermhelderheid te verlagen schakelen sommige laptops het backlight erg snel aan en uit. Dit gebeurt aan een dergelijk hoge frequentie dat het niet zichtbaar is voor het menselijk oog. Als de frequentie te laag is kunnen personen met gevoelige ogen geïrriteerd geraken, hoofdpijn krijgen en zelfs flickering waarnemen.
Screen flickering / PWM waargenomen 245.1 Hz

Het backlight van het scherm flikkert aan 245.1 Hz (hoogstwaarschijnlijk met PWM - Pulse-Width Modulation) .

De frequentie van 245.1 Hz is redelijk laag en de meeste mensen die gevoelig zijn aan flickering kunnen dit dus waarnemen of geïrriteerde ogen krijgen (gebruikmakend van de vermelde helderheid en lager).

Ter vergelijking: 52 % van alle geteste toestellen maakten geen gebruik van PWM om de schermhelderheid te verlagen. Als het wel werd gebruikt, werd een gemiddelde van 8931 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz waargenomen.

Responstijd Scherm

De responstijden van het scherm tonen hoe snel het scherm in staat is om van één kleur naar de andere te veranderen. Trage responstijden kunnen aanleiding geven tot 'nabeelden' rond bewegende objecten of het scherm wazig maken (blur). Vooral spelers van snelle 3D-games hebben baat bij een scherm met snelle responstijden.
       Responstijd Zwart naar Wit
4 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd↗ 2 ms stijging
↘ 2 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde erg snelle responstijden in onze tests en zou zeer geschikt moeten zijn voor snelle games.
Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.8 (minimum) tot 240 (maximum) ms. » 1 % van alle toestellen zijn beter.
Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd beter is dan het gemiddelde (25.6 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.
       Responstijd 50% Grijs naar 80% Grijs
4.8 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd↗ 2.8 ms stijging
↘ 2 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde erg snelle responstijden in onze tests en zou zeer geschikt moeten zijn voor snelle games.
Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.9 (minimum) tot 636 (maximum) ms. » 1 % van alle toestellen zijn beter.
Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd beter is dan het gemiddelde (41 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.
Geekbench 4.1/4.2
Compute RenderScript Score (sorteer op waarde)
Google Pixel 3
13620 Points ∼100%
Huawei P20 Pro
8025 Points ∼59% -41%
Sony Xperia XZ3
13194 Points ∼97% -3%
HTC U12 Plus
12493 Points ∼92% -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (10876 - 14489, n=19)
13635 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (836 - 21070, n=197)
4524 Points ∼33% -67%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sorteer op waarde)
Google Pixel 3
7754 Points ∼67%
Huawei P20 Pro
6756 Points ∼58% -13%
Apple iPhone XS
11598 Points ∼100% +50%
Sony Xperia XZ3
7934 Points ∼68% +2%
HTC U12 Plus
8812 Points ∼76% +14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (7754 - 9231, n=21)
8655 Points ∼75% +12%
Average of class Smartphone (883 - 11598, n=247)
4308 Points ∼37% -44%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sorteer op waarde)
Google Pixel 3
2355 Points ∼49%
Huawei P20 Pro
1922 Points ∼40% -18%
Apple iPhone XS
4824 Points ∼100% +105%
Sony Xperia XZ3
2272 Points ∼47% -4%
HTC U12 Plus
2429 Points ∼50% +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (2272 - 2500, n=21)
2417 Points ∼50% +3%
Average of class Smartphone (394 - 4824, n=248)
1270 Points ∼26% -46%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sorteer op waarde)
Google Pixel 3
9063 Points ∼100%
Huawei P20 Pro
6982 Points ∼77% -23%
Sony Xperia XZ3
Points ∼0% -100%
HTC U12 Plus
8601 Points ∼95% -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (8326 - 9868, n=22)
8018 Points ∼88% -12%
Average of class Smartphone (3146 - 9868, n=255)
4555 Points ∼50% -50%
Work performance score (sorteer op waarde)
Google Pixel 3
11744 Points ∼100%
Huawei P20 Pro
8115 Points ∼69% -31%
Sony Xperia XZ3
11474 Points ∼98% -2%
HTC U12 Plus
10264 Points ∼87% -13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (7998 - 13211, n=20)
10123 Points ∼86% -14%
Average of class Smartphone (6412 - 13531, n=423)
4958 Points ∼42% -58%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Google Pixel 3
2979 Points ∼79%
Huawei P20 Pro
2942 Points ∼78% -1%
Apple iPhone XS
2998 Points ∼80% +1%
Sony Xperia XZ3
3764 Points ∼100% +26%
HTC U12 Plus
2947 Points ∼78% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (2223 - 3764, n=22)
3110 Points ∼83% +4%
Average of class Smartphone (2293 - 4439, n=277)
1709 Points ∼45% -43%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Google Pixel 3
4882 Points ∼84%
Huawei P20 Pro
3109 Points ∼54% -36%
Apple iPhone XS
5139 Points ∼88% +5%
Sony Xperia XZ3
5810 Points ∼100% +19%
HTC U12 Plus
4450 Points ∼77% -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (4209 - 8206, n=22)
5494 Points ∼95% +13%
Average of class Smartphone (869 - 8206, n=277)
1465 Points ∼25% -70%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sorteer op waarde)
Google Pixel 3
4275 Points ∼82%
Huawei P20 Pro
3070 Points ∼59% -28%
Apple iPhone XS
4436 Points ∼86% +4%
Sony Xperia XZ3
5184 Points ∼100% +21%
HTC U12 Plus
3997 Points ∼77% -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (3512 - 5189, n=22)
4646 Points ∼90% +9%
Average of class Smartphone (1010 - 5189, n=280)
1360 Points ∼26% -68%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Google Pixel 3
2781 Points ∼76%
Huawei P20 Pro
2940 Points ∼80% +6%
Apple iPhone XS
2952 Points ∼80% +6%
Sony Xperia XZ3
3672 Points ∼100% +32%
HTC U12 Plus
2656 Points ∼72% -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (2110 - 3763, n=21)
3081 Points ∼84% +11%
Average of class Smartphone (375 - 4493, n=292)
1689 Points ∼46% -39%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Google Pixel 3
6404 Points ∼43%
Huawei P20 Pro
3503 Points ∼23% -45%
Apple iPhone XS
14951 Points ∼100% +133%
Sony Xperia XZ3
8369 Points ∼56% +31%
HTC U12 Plus
6419 Points ∼43% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (5228 - 8451, n=21)
7720 Points ∼52% +21%
Average of class Smartphone (131 - 14951, n=292)
2068 Points ∼14% -68%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sorteer op waarde)
Google Pixel 3
4966 Points ∼63%
Huawei P20 Pro
3360 Points ∼43% -32%
Apple iPhone XS
7856 Points ∼100% +58%
Sony Xperia XZ3
6517 Points ∼83% +31%
HTC U12 Plus
4882 Points ∼62% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (4054 - 6568, n=21)
5771 Points ∼73% +16%
Average of class Smartphone (159 - 7856, n=293)
1734 Points ∼22% -65%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Google Pixel 3
3203 Points ∼86%
Huawei P20 Pro
2926 Points ∼79% -9%
Apple iPhone XS
2960 Points ∼80% -8%
Sony Xperia XZ3
3703 Points ∼100% +16%
HTC U12 Plus
3197 Points ∼86% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (2118 - 3703, n=21)
3268 Points ∼88% +2%
Average of class Smartphone (2281 - 4216, n=352)
1642 Points ∼44% -49%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Google Pixel 3
5188 Points ∼100%
Huawei P20 Pro
3017 Points ∼58% -42%
Apple iPhone XS
3712 Points ∼72% -28%
Sony Xperia XZ3
5092 Points ∼98% -2%
HTC U12 Plus
3488 Points ∼67% -33%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (3488 - 5241, n=21)
4944 Points ∼95% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (815 - 5241, n=352)
1186 Points ∼23% -77%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sorteer op waarde)
Google Pixel 3
4560 Points ∼97%
Huawei P20 Pro
2996 Points ∼64% -34%
Apple iPhone XS
3514 Points ∼75% -23%
Sony Xperia XZ3
4700 Points ∼100% +3%
HTC U12 Plus
3419 Points ∼73% -25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (3197 - 4734, n=21)
4424 Points ∼94% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (951 - 4734, n=360)
1134 Points ∼24% -75%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Google Pixel 3
2533 Points ∼70%
Huawei P20 Pro
2885 Points ∼80% +14%
Apple iPhone XS
Points ∼0% -100%
Sony Xperia XZ3
3603 Points ∼100% +42%
HTC U12 Plus
2774 Points ∼77% +10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (2159 - 3668, n=21)
3129 Points ∼87% +24%
Average of class Smartphone (532 - 4215, n=384)
1540 Points ∼43% -39%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Google Pixel 3
7075 Points ∼88%
Huawei P20 Pro
3335 Points ∼42% -53%
Apple iPhone XS
Points ∼0% -100%
Sony Xperia XZ3
8014 Points ∼100% +13%
HTC U12 Plus
5637 Points ∼70% -20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (5637 - 8312, n=21)
7818 Points ∼98% +11%
Average of class Smartphone (46 - 8312, n=384)
1632 Points ∼20% -77%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sorteer op waarde)
Google Pixel 3
5059 Points ∼80%
Huawei P20 Pro
3223 Points ∼51% -36%
Apple iPhone XS
Points ∼0% -100%
Sony Xperia XZ3
6300 Points ∼100% +25%
HTC U12 Plus
4585 Points ∼73% -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (4529 - 6454, n=21)
5843 Points ∼93% +15%
Average of class Smartphone (58 - 6454, n=392)
1387 Points ∼22% -73%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Google Pixel 3
32914 Points ∼89%
Huawei P20 Pro
22441 Points ∼61% -32%
Apple iPhone XS
27400 Points ∼74% -17%
Sony Xperia XZ3
36794 Points ∼100% +12%
HTC U12 Plus
33810 Points ∼92% +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (15614 - 37475, n=21)
33400 Points ∼91% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (3958 - 37475, n=539)
12880 Points ∼35% -61%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sorteer op waarde)
Google Pixel 3
84256 Points ∼53%
Huawei P20 Pro
33472 Points ∼21% -60%
Apple iPhone XS
160199 Points ∼100% +90%
Sony Xperia XZ3
83927 Points ∼52% 0%
HTC U12 Plus
81726 Points ∼51% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (53794 - 84998, n=21)
80111 Points ∼50% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (2465 - 162695, n=539)
17994 Points ∼11% -79%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sorteer op waarde)
Google Pixel 3
62568 Points ∼81%
Huawei P20 Pro
30176 Points ∼39% -52%
Apple iPhone XS
77128 Points ∼100% +23%
Sony Xperia XZ3
65330 Points ∼85% +4%
HTC U12 Plus
62152 Points ∼81% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (34855 - 65330, n=21)
60990 Points ∼79% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (2915 - 77599, n=540)
15114 Points ∼20% -76%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sorteer op waarde)
Google Pixel 3
127 fps ∼51%
Huawei P20 Pro
121 fps ∼48% -5%
Apple iPhone XS
251 fps ∼100% +98%
Sony Xperia XZ3
152 fps ∼61% +20%
HTC U12 Plus
98 fps ∼39% -23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (98 - 152, n=22)
144 fps ∼57% +13%
Average of class Smartphone (4.1 - 251, n=564)
31.4 fps ∼13% -75%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sorteer op waarde)
Google Pixel 3
61 fps ∼97%
Huawei P20 Pro
60 fps ∼96% -2%
Apple iPhone XS
60 fps ∼96% -2%
Sony Xperia XZ3
60 fps ∼96% -2%
HTC U12 Plus
59 fps ∼94% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (58 - 89, n=21)
62.7 fps ∼100% +3%
Average of class Smartphone (6.9 - 120, n=567)
25 fps ∼40% -59%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sorteer op waarde)
Google Pixel 3
55 fps ∼48%
Huawei P20 Pro
61 fps ∼53% +11%
Apple iPhone XS
115 fps ∼100% +109%
Sony Xperia XZ3
83 fps ∼72% +51%
HTC U12 Plus
72 fps ∼63% +31%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (54 - 83, n=21)
73 fps ∼63% +33%
Average of class Smartphone (2.2 - 132, n=486)
16.8 fps ∼15% -69%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sorteer op waarde)
Google Pixel 3
54 fps ∼90%
Huawei P20 Pro
54 fps ∼90% 0%
Apple iPhone XS
60 fps ∼100% +11%
Sony Xperia XZ3
50 fps ∼83% -7%
HTC U12 Plus
35 fps ∼58% -35%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (35 - 75, n=21)
55 fps ∼92% +2%
Average of class Smartphone (4.1 - 115, n=489)
16 fps ∼27% -70%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Google Pixel 3
46 fps ∼74%
Huawei P20 Pro
39 fps ∼63% -15%
Apple iPhone XS
62 fps ∼100% +35%
Sony Xperia XZ3
57 fps ∼92% +24%
HTC U12 Plus
39 fps ∼63% -15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (32 - 61, n=22)
54.4 fps ∼88% +18%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 88, n=349)
14.3 fps ∼23% -69%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Google Pixel 3
41 fps ∼85%
Huawei P20 Pro
36 fps ∼75% -12%
Apple iPhone XS
48 fps ∼100% +17%
Sony Xperia XZ3
31 fps ∼65% -24%
HTC U12 Plus
31 fps ∼65% -24%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (25 - 59, n=21)
46.5 fps ∼97% +13%
Average of class Smartphone (9.8 - 110, n=352)
13.9 fps ∼29% -66%
GFXBench
High Tier Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Google Pixel 3
23 fps ∼66%
Huawei P20 Pro
14 fps ∼40% -39%
Apple iPhone XS
35 fps ∼100% +52%
Sony Xperia XZ3
14 fps ∼40% -39%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (13 - 25, n=10)
19.8 fps ∼57% -14%
Average of class Smartphone (3.6 - 59, n=62)
10.2 fps ∼29% -56%
2560x1440 High Tier Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Google Pixel 3
11 fps ∼50%
Huawei P20 Pro
8.6 fps ∼39% -22%
Apple iPhone XS
22 fps ∼100% +100%
Sony Xperia XZ3
14 fps ∼64% +27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (11 - 31, n=10)
15.4 fps ∼70% +40%
Average of class Smartphone (2.2 - 31, n=62)
6.49 fps ∼30% -41%
Normal Tier Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Google Pixel 3
27 fps ∼66%
Huawei P20 Pro
23 fps ∼56% -15%
Apple iPhone XS
41 fps ∼100% +52%
Sony Xperia XZ3
21 fps ∼51% -22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (20 - 40, n=10)
28.5 fps ∼70% +6%
Average of class Smartphone (5.7 - 59, n=62)
14.4 fps ∼35% -47%
1920x1080 Normal Tier Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Google Pixel 3
29 fps ∼60%
Huawei P20 Pro
23 fps ∼48% -21%
Apple iPhone XS
48 fps ∼100% +66%
Sony Xperia XZ3
37 fps ∼77% +28%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (29 - 38, n=9)
35 fps ∼73% +21%
Average of class Smartphone (6 - 63, n=61)
15.7 fps ∼33% -46%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Google Pixel 3
28 fps ∼74%
Huawei P20 Pro
23 fps ∼61% -18%
Apple iPhone XS
38 fps ∼100% +36%
Sony Xperia XZ3
35 fps ∼92% +25%
HTC U12 Plus
35 fps ∼92% +25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (25 - 35, n=21)
34 fps ∼89% +21%
Average of class Smartphone (6.3 - 54, n=280)
9.86 fps ∼26% -65%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Google Pixel 3
26 fps ∼84%
Huawei P20 Pro
22 fps ∼71% -15%
Apple iPhone XS
31 fps ∼100% +19%
Sony Xperia XZ3
19 fps ∼61% -27%
HTC U12 Plus
20 fps ∼65% -23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (17 - 37, n=21)
28.3 fps ∼91% +9%
Average of class Smartphone (6 - 58, n=283)
8.89 fps ∼29% -66%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sorteer op waarde)
Google Pixel 3
280162 Points ∼80%
Huawei P20 Pro
207959 Points ∼60% -26%
Apple iPhone XS
348178 Points ∼100% +24%
Sony Xperia XZ3
292268 Points ∼84% +4%
HTC U12 Plus
255739 Points ∼73% -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (246366 - 299878, n=22)
275958 Points ∼79% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (17073 - 348178, n=170)
118332 Points ∼34% -58%
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sorteer op waarde)
Google Pixel 3
220797 Points ∼97%
Huawei P20 Pro
179709 Points ∼79% -19%
Sony Xperia XZ3
226853 Points ∼100% +3%
HTC U12 Plus
221971 Points ∼98% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (162183 - 242953, n=18)
223967 Points ∼99% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (23275 - 254229, n=389)
76442 Points ∼34% -65%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sorteer op waarde)
Google Pixel 3
1435 Points ∼84%
Huawei P20 Pro
1273 Points ∼74% -11%
Apple iPhone XS
1711 Points ∼100% +19%
Sony Xperia XZ3
1390 Points ∼81% -3%
HTC U12 Plus
1437 Points ∼84% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (1009 - 1613, n=20)
1348 Points ∼79% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (7 - 1731, n=499)
698 Points ∼41% -51%
Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Google Pixel 3
7965 Points ∼50%
Huawei P20 Pro
3725 Points ∼23% -53%
Apple iPhone XS
15875 Points ∼100% +99%
Sony Xperia XZ3
7989 Points ∼50% 0%
HTC U12 Plus
7945 Points ∼50% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (5846 - 8001, n=20)
7816 Points ∼49% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (18 - 15969, n=499)
1737 Points ∼11% -78%
Memory (sorteer op waarde)
Google Pixel 3
4650 Points ∼100%
Huawei P20 Pro
4050 Points ∼87% -13%
Apple iPhone XS
4169 Points ∼90% -10%
Sony Xperia XZ3
2317 Points ∼50% -50%
HTC U12 Plus
3641 Points ∼78% -22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (2193 - 5296, n=20)
3594 Points ∼77% -23%
Average of class Smartphone (21 - 6283, n=499)
1244 Points ∼27% -73%
System (sorteer op waarde)
Google Pixel 3
7826 Points ∼64%
Huawei P20 Pro
5965 Points ∼49% -24%
Apple iPhone XS
12202 Points ∼100% +56%
Sony Xperia XZ3
8135 Points ∼67% +4%
HTC U12 Plus
7862 Points ∼64% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (4417 - 8613, n=20)
7657 Points ∼63% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (369 - 12202, n=499)
2512 Points ∼21% -68%
Overall (sorteer op waarde)
Google Pixel 3
4516 Points ∼74%
Huawei P20 Pro
3271 Points ∼54% -28%
Apple iPhone XS
6097 Points ∼100% +35%
Sony Xperia XZ3
3804 Points ∼62% -16%
HTC U12 Plus
4252 Points ∼70% -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (3291 - 4693, n=20)
4099 Points ∼67% -9%
Average of class Smartphone (150 - 6097, n=503)
1255 Points ∼21% -72%

Legende

 
Google Pixel 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Qualcomm Adreno 630, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Huawei P20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 970, ARM Mali-G72 MP12, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Apple iPhone XS Apple A12 Bionic, Apple A12 Bionic GPU, Apple 512 GB (iPhone Xs)
 
Sony Xperia XZ3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Qualcomm Adreno 630, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
HTC U12 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Qualcomm Adreno 630, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
Apple iPhone XS (Safari Mobile 12.0)
272.3 Points ∼100% +215%
Sony Xperia XZ3 (Chrome 70)
87.883 Points ∼32% +2%
HTC U12 Plus (Chrome 66)
87.036 Points ∼32% +1%
Google Pixel 3 (Chrome 70)
86.331 Points ∼32%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (22.5 - 90.9, n=22)
76.9 Points ∼28% -11%
Huawei P20 Pro (Chrome 65)
58.255 Points ∼21% -33%
Average of class Smartphone (10.8 - 273, n=422)
36.7 Points ∼13% -57%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone XS (Safari Mobile 12.0)
43280 Points ∼100% +163%
Sony Xperia XZ3 (Chrome 70)
16982 Points ∼39% +3%
Google Pixel 3 (Chrome 70)
16454 Points ∼38%
HTC U12 Plus (Chrome 66)
16285 Points ∼38% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (3991 - 18275, n=22)
15431 Points ∼36% -6%
Huawei P20 Pro (Chrome 65)
11584 Points ∼27% -30%
Average of class Smartphone (1506 - 43280, n=558)
5562 Points ∼13% -66%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (603 - 59466, n=578)
11474 ms * ∼100% -398%
Huawei P20 Pro (Chrome 65)
3852.2 ms * ∼34% -67%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (2154 - 11204, n=22)
2874 ms * ∼25% -25%
HTC U12 Plus (Chrome 66)
2409.6 ms * ∼21% -5%
Google Pixel 3 (Chrome 70)
2304.5 ms * ∼20%
Sony Xperia XZ3 (Chrome 70)
2295 ms * ∼20% -0%
Apple iPhone XS (Safari Mobile 12.0)
609.1 ms * ∼5% +74%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Apple iPhone XS (Safari Mobile 12.0)
159 Points ∼100% +61%
HTC U12 Plus (Chrome 66)
101 Points ∼64% +2%
Google Pixel 3 (Chrome 70)
99 Points ∼62%
Sony Xperia XZ3 (Chrome 70)
98 Points ∼62% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (19 - 103, n=15)
84.5 Points ∼53% -15%
Huawei P20 Pro (Chrome 65)
69 Points ∼43% -30%
Average of class Smartphone (25 - 161, n=63)
63.6 Points ∼40% -36%

* ... kleiner is beter

Google Pixel 3Huawei P20 ProSony Xperia XZ3HTC U12 PlusAverage 64 GB UFS 2.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
8%
-24%
-11%
-18%
-72%
Random Write 4KB
133.76
160.49
20%
22.22
-83%
104.24
-22%
50.5 (8.77 - 156, n=34)
-62%
16.1 (0.14 - 164, n=607)
-88%
Random Read 4KB
149.82
144.33
-4%
135.67
-9%
118.14
-21%
134 (78.2 - 173, n=34)
-11%
38.3 (1.59 - 173, n=607)
-74%
Sequential Write 256KB
181.81
196.69
8%
196.14
8%
195.82
8%
193 (133 - 229, n=34)
6%
79.9 (2.99 - 246, n=607)
-56%
Sequential Read 256KB
766.41
831.82
9%
680.98
-11%
709.11
-7%
727 (529 - 895, n=34)
-5%
230 (12.1 - 895, n=607)
-70%
Arena of Valor
010203040506070Tooltip
; min: Ø60.9 (60-61)
; high HD: Ø57 (47-61)
Asphalt 9: Legends
010203040506070Tooltip
; High Quality: Ø60.9 (60-61)
; Standard / low: Ø30.2 (27-31)
Max. Belasting
 35.2 °C35.1 °C32.3 °C 
 35.4 °C35 °C32.3 °C 
 35.4 °C34.4 °C32 °C 
Maximum: 35.4 °C
Gemiddelde: 34.1 °C
31.6 °C31.4 °C34.2 °C
31 °C32.4 °C37 °C
30 °C33.3 °C35.5 °C
Maximum: 37 °C
Gemiddelde: 32.9 °C
Stroomadapter (max.)  29.9 °C | Kamertemperatuur 21.1 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 34.1 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35.4 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 35.7 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 37 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 34.2 °C / 94 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.2 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 33.2 °C / 92 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2032.633.82528.926.53125.224.14026.120.45030.227.46326.919.68028.721.710029.120.812518.431.5160215220024.350.925017.459.231516.86240015.362.750015.665.663014.168.480015.273.1100014.173.1125014.673.7160014.673.6200014.272.4250013.873.431501475.6400014.667500014.470.6630014.676.3800014.474.81000014.871.41250014.660.31600014.763.3SPL2784.9N0.964.3median 14.6median 68.4Delta1.49.13030.130.123.529.328.426.92632.826.624.824.520.723.219.535.718.644.221.451.72552.617.454.516.255.418.458.215.461.713.56513.764.213.768.414.673.414.975.914.476.414.777.114.677.414.878.314.776.914.676.51575.614.966.915.159.614.951.827.287.30.967.5median 14.9median 651.411.6hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseGoogle Pixel 3Apple iPhone XS
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Google Pixel 3 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 26% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 68% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Apple iPhone XS audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.6% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 10.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 12% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 81% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 43% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 49% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Stroomgebruik
Uit / Standbydarklight 0.02 / 0.41 Watt
Inactiefdarkmidlight 1.21 / 2.01 / 2.05 Watt
Belasting midlight 4.06 / 8.79 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Google Pixel 3
2915 mAh
Huawei P20 Pro
4000 mAh
Apple iPhone XS
2658 mAh
Sony Xperia XZ3
3300 mAh
HTC U12 Plus
3500 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
38%
25%
22%
-10%
5%
16%
Idle Minimum *
1.21
0.84
31%
0.95
21%
0.8
34%
0.77
36%
0.802 (0.42 - 1.8, n=19)
34%
0.88 (0.2 - 3.4, n=636)
27%
Idle Average *
2.01
1.54
23%
1.34
33%
1.2
40%
2.18
-8%
1.722 (0.67 - 2.9, n=19)
14%
1.719 (0.6 - 6.2, n=635)
14%
Idle Maximum *
2.05
1.57
23%
1.48
28%
1.5
27%
2.21
-8%
2.1 (0.87 - 3.5, n=19)
-2%
1.998 (0.74 - 6.6, n=636)
3%
Load Average *
4.06
2.47
39%
4
1%
4.8
-18%
6.25
-54%
4.79 (3.64 - 7.2, n=19)
-18%
4.04 (0.8 - 10.8, n=630)
-0%
Load Maximum *
8.79
2.49
72%
5.13
42%
6.2
29%
10.16
-16%
9.2 (6.2 - 12.3, n=19)
-5%
5.75 (1.2 - 14.2, n=630)
35%

* ... kleiner is beter

Batterijduur
Inactief (zonder WLAN, minimale helderheid)
22h 52min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
7h 51min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
12h 07min
Belast (maximale helderheid)
2h 39min
Google Pixel 3
2915 mAh
Huawei P20 Pro
4000 mAh
Apple iPhone XS
2658 mAh
Sony Xperia XZ3
3300 mAh
HTC U12 Plus
3500 mAh
Batterijduur
52%
21%
-8%
6%
Reader / Idle
1372
1727
26%
1442
5%
1270
-7%
1452
6%
H.264
727
784
8%
745
2%
420
-42%
464
-36%
WiFi v1.3
471
744
58%
570
21%
419
-11%
507
8%
Load
159
345
117%
245
54%
202
27%
230
45%

Pro

+ zuivere Android 9 Pie
+ USB 3.1 Type-C
+ Bluetooth 5.0
+ prima luidsprekers
+ wereldwijde LTE-dekking
+ OLED-scherm

Contra

- niet-uitbreidbaar geheugen
- matige batterijduur
- lage maximumhelderheid
- Active-Edge niet aanpasbaar
Getest: de Google Pixel 3 smartphone. Testtoestel voorzien door Google Germany.
Getest: de Google Pixel 3 smartphone. Testtoestel voorzien door Google Germany.

Dit is de verkorte versie van het originele artikel. Het volledige, Engelse testrapport vind je hier.

De Google Pixel 3 is een degelijke high-end smartphone. Het toestel is duur en heeft volgens ons een verouderd design, maar zijn hoofdcamera, zuivere Android-ervaring en luidsprekers zijn indrukwekkend. Active Edge is ook een handige extra, al beperkt het gebrek aan mogelijkheden tot personalisatie het werkelijke nut van de feature.

De Pixel 3 maakt heel wat juiste keuzes. Helaas mist het toestel de features die het prijskaartje van 800 euro kunnen rechtvaardigen, zeker aangezien veel concurrenten meer te bieden hebben voor minder geld.

Daarnaast heeft de Pixel 3 een relatief donker scherm en is de batterij ietwat teleurstellend. We hopen dat Google dit met updates kan verbeteren, aangezien dit nadeel heel wat roet in het eten komt gooien voor het anders uitstekende vlaggenschip. De Pixel kan zich moeilijk onderscheiden van de concurrentie, maar de dingen die hij doet, doet hij perfect. We zouden de Pixel 3 aanbevelen voor wie op zoek is naar de zuiverste Android-ervaring die ja kan krijgen, frequente updates, een sublieme hoofdcamera en uitstekende luidsprekers.

Google Pixel 3 - 21-11-2018 v6
Mike Wobker

Behuizing
89%
Toetsenbord
66 / 75 → 88%
Aanwijsapparaat
95%
Aansluitmogelijkheden
42 / 60 → 70%
Gewicht
93%
Batterij
92%
Beeldscherm
91%
Gaming-performance
67 / 63 → 100%
Applicatie-performance
77 / 70 → 100%
Temperatuur
92%
Luidheid
100%
Audio
76 / 91 → 83%
Camera
83%
Gemiddelde
82%
90%
Smartphone - Gewogen Gemiddelde

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Overzichten en testrapporten over laptops en mobieltjes > Testrapporten > Kort testrapport Google Pixel 3 Smartphone
Mike Wobker, 2018-11-29 (Update: 2018-11-29)