Notebookcheck

Kort testrapport Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra - high-end smartphone met smet van imperfectie

Smartphone monster. Samsung's Galaxy S20 Ultra lijkt op het Plus-model, maar dan opgevoerd. Het heeft niet alleen een nog groter beeldscherm, maar komt ook met een aanzienlijk verbeterde camera opstelling en een grotere batterij. Lees in ons testrapport of de Exynos SoC echt zoveel langzamer is en of de meerprijs het daadwerkelijk waard is.
Daniel Schmidt, 👁 Daniel Schmidt, Andrea Grüblinger, 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra (Galaxy S20 Serie)
Processor
Samsung Exynos 990 8 x 2 - 2.7 GHz, Exynos M5 / Cortex A-76 / Cortex-A55
Grafische kaart
ARM Mali-G77 MP11
Geheugen
12288 MB 
, LPDDR5
Beeldscherm
6.90 inch 20:9, 3200 x 1440 pixel 509 PPI, 10-punts multitouch beeldscherm, Infinity-O Display, Dynamic AMOLED 2X, Corning Gorilla Glass 6, HDR10+, glimmend: ja, HDR, 120 Hz
Opslag
128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash, 128 GB 
, 104.3 GB beschikbaar
Verbindingen
1 USB 3.0, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Audio Verbindingen: USB-C, Card Reader: microSD (max. 1 TB, FAT, FAT32, exFAT), 1 Vingerafdruklezer, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensoren: nabijheidssensor, versnellingssensor, positionele sensor, oriëntatie sensor, G-sensor, magnetometer, barometer, ultrasone vingerafdrukscanner, MST, Ant+
Netwerkmogelijkheden
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5.0, GSM/GPRS/Edge (850, 900, 1,800, en 1,900 MHz); UMTS/HSPA+ (Band 1, 2, 4, 5, en 8); LTE Cat. 20 (Band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, en 66), 5G (Band NR1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 40, 77, en 78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Afmetingen
hoogte x breedte x diepte (in mm): 8.8 x 166.9 x 76
Batterij
19.3 Wh, 5000 mAh Lithium-Ion, 3.86 V
Charging
wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge
Besturingssysteem
Android 10
Camera
Primary Camera: 108 MPix (f/1.8, 26 mm, 1/1.33", 0.8 µm) + 48MP (4x optische zoom, OIS, f/3.5, 103 mm, 1/2.0", 0.8 µm) + 12MP (f/2.2, 13 mm, 1.4 µm, Super Steady Video) + 0.3 MP (3D, f/1.0); 8k-Video; Camera2 API Level: volledig
Secondary Camera: 40 MPix (f/2.2, 26 mm, 0.7 µm)
Bijkomende functionaliteiten
Luidsprekers: twee luidsprekers, Toetsenbord: virtueel, oplader, USB-kabel, AKG headset, OTG-adapter, documentatie, One UI 2.1, Facebook apps, Microsoft apps, Galaxy Store, 24 Maanden Garantie, lichaam SAR: 1.557 W/kg, hoofd SAR: 0.660 W/kg, IP68, fanless, waterproof
Gewicht
219 g, Voeding: 72 g
Prijs
1349 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

, , , , , ,
zoekrelatie.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

Vergleichsgeräte

Evaluatie
Datum
Model
Gewicht
Drive
Formaat
Resolutie
Best Price
89 %
04-2020
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11
219 g128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash6.90"3200x1440
87 %
09-2019
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU
226 g64 GB SSD6.50"2688x1242
86 %
03-2020
Oppo Find X2 Pro
SD 865, Adreno 650
202 g512 GB UFS 3.0 Flash6.70"3168x1440
89 %
12-2019
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16
198 g256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash6.53"2400x1176
87 %
11-2019
OnePlus 7T Pro
SD 855+, Adreno 640
206 g256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash6.67"3120x1440
84 %
10-2019
LG G8X ThinQ
SD 855, Adreno 640
192 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.40"2340x1080
87 %
07-2019
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12
198 g256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.70"3040x1440
Networking
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
966 (923min - 995max) MBit/s ∼100% +18%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
637 (584min - 715max) MBit/s ∼66% -22%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Mali-G77 MP11, Exynos 990, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
818 (425min - 890max) MBit/s ∼85%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD
589 (461min - 625max) MBit/s ∼61% -28%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 865, 512 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
509 (264min - 571max) MBit/s ∼53% -38%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.59 - 1599, n=295, last 2 years)
399 MBit/s ∼41% -51%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Adreno 640, SD 855+, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
352 (311min - 375max) MBit/s ∼36% -57%
LG G8X ThinQ
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
343 (290min - 411max) MBit/s ∼36% -58%
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
1010 (912min - 1092max) MBit/s ∼100% +22%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
533 (468min - 602max) MBit/s ∼53% -35%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Mali-G77 MP11, Exynos 990, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
825 (763min - 855max) MBit/s ∼82%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 865, 512 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
754 (346min - 881max) MBit/s ∼75% -9%
LG G8X ThinQ
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
651 (539min - 678max) MBit/s ∼64% -21%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD
580 (550min - 597max) MBit/s ∼57% -30%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Adreno 640, SD 855+, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
471 (347min - 505max) MBit/s ∼47% -43%
Average of class Smartphone
  (15.5 - 1414, n=295, last 2 years)
406 MBit/s ∼40% -51%
04590135180225270315360405450495540585630675720765810855825834829843795780818846827777811848843855850845851849838813841819804850832790763819815818825834829843795780818846827777811848843855850845851849838813841819804850832790763819815818425746872890862802804835854824856838752805823824869832830866724867771880801789760774825712Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø824 (763-855)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø804 (425-890)
Garmin Edge 500 - overview
Garmin Edge 500 - overview
Garmin Edge 500 - lake
Garmin Edge 500 - lake
Garmin Edge 500 - turning point
Garmin Edge 500 - turning point
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra - overview
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra - overview
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra - lake
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra - lake
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra - turning point
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra - turning point

Beeldvergelijking

Bekijk een scène en navigeer binnen het eerste beeld. Eén klik wijzigt het zoomniveau. Eén klik op het ingezoomde beeld opent het origineel in een nieuw venster. Het eerste beeld toont de verschaalde foto van het testtoestel.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
ColorChecker
15.6 ∆E
9.7 ∆E
10.6 ∆E
16.9 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
10.7 ∆E
8.3 ∆E
12.1 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
8.7 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
14.5 ∆E
11.3 ∆E
3.7 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
7 ∆E
3.3 ∆E
3.1 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
1 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra: 8.14 ∆E min: 0.98 - max: 16.9 ∆E
ColorChecker
28.1 ∆E
48.4 ∆E
36.5 ∆E
33.9 ∆E
41.6 ∆E
58.6 ∆E
47.8 ∆E
32.9 ∆E
36.6 ∆E
27.6 ∆E
58.4 ∆E
58.9 ∆E
29.9 ∆E
45 ∆E
33 ∆E
67.1 ∆E
39.4 ∆E
42 ∆E
68.9 ∆E
65.3 ∆E
48.5 ∆E
35.9 ∆E
23.3 ∆E
13.5 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra: 42.54 ∆E min: 13.46 - max: 68.86 ∆E
737
cd/m²
733
cd/m²
762
cd/m²
738
cd/m²
734
cd/m²
769
cd/m²
749
cd/m²
740
cd/m²
768
cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling
Infinity-O Display
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 769 cd/m² Gemiddelde: 747.8 cd/m² Minimum: 1.71 cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling: 95 %
Helderheid in Batterij-modus: 734 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Zwart: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.2 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.6
ΔE Greyscale 2.7 | 0.64-98 Ø5.8
99.2% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.11
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 3200x1440, 6.90
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
OLED, 2688x1242, 6.50
Oppo Find X2 Pro
AMOLED, 3168x1440, 6.70
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
OLED, 2400x1176, 6.53
OnePlus 7T Pro
AMOLED, 3120x1440, 6.67
LG G8X ThinQ
OLED, 2340x1080, 6.40
Screen
25%
-27%
1%
0%
-50%
Brightness middle
734
790
8%
778
6%
592
-19%
606
-17%
570
-22%
Brightness
748
790
6%
775
4%
605
-19%
611
-18%
581
-22%
Brightness Distribution
95
97
2%
99
4%
96
1%
95
0%
90
-5%
Black Level *
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
3.2
1.4
56%
4.4
-38%
2.5
22%
3.46
-8%
6.27
-96%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
6.8
3.4
50%
8.7
-28%
5.5
19%
5.64
17%
9.75
-43%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
2.7
1.9
30%
5.6
-107%
2.6
4%
2
26%
5.7
-111%
Gamma
2.11 104%
2.23 99%
2.26 97%
2.16 102%
2.258 97%
2.37 93%
CCT
6299 103%
6466 101%
7250 90%
6173 105%
6779 96%
7309 89%

* ... kleiner is beter

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Om de schermhelderheid te verlagen schakelen sommige laptops het backlight erg snel aan en uit. Dit gebeurt aan een dergelijk hoge frequentie dat het niet zichtbaar is voor het menselijk oog. Als de frequentie te laag is kunnen personen met gevoelige ogen geïrriteerd geraken, hoofdpijn krijgen en zelfs flickering waarnemen.
Screen flickering / PWM waargenomen 240.4 Hz ≤ 99 % helderheid instelling

Het backlight van het scherm flikkert aan 240.4 Hz (hoogstwaarschijnlijk met PWM - Pulse-Width Modulation) aan een helderheid van 99 % en lager. Boven deze helderheid zou er geen flickering / PWM mogen optreden.

De frequentie van 240.4 Hz is redelijk laag en de meeste mensen die gevoelig zijn aan flickering kunnen dit dus waarnemen of geïrriteerde ogen krijgen (gebruikmakend van de vermelde helderheid en lager).

Ter vergelijking: 51 % van alle geteste toestellen maakten geen gebruik van PWM om de schermhelderheid te verlagen. Als het wel werd gebruikt, werd een gemiddelde van 9720 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 151500) Hz waargenomen.

Responstijd Scherm

De responstijden van het scherm tonen hoe snel het scherm in staat is om van één kleur naar de andere te veranderen. Trage responstijden kunnen aanleiding geven tot 'nabeelden' rond bewegende objecten of het scherm wazig maken (blur). Vooral spelers van snelle 3D-games hebben baat bij een scherm met snelle responstijden.
       Responstijd Zwart naar Wit
2.8 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd↗ 1.2 ms stijging
↘ 1.6 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde erg snelle responstijden in onze tests en zou zeer geschikt moeten zijn voor snelle games.
Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.8 (minimum) tot 240 (maximum) ms. » 2 % van alle toestellen zijn beter.
Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd beter is dan het gemiddelde (24.1 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.
       Responstijd 50% Grijs naar 80% Grijs
9.6 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd↗ 4.8 ms stijging
↘ 4.8 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde snelle responstijden in onze tests en zou geschikt moeten zijn voor games.
Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.8 (minimum) tot 636 (maximum) ms. » 10 % van alle toestellen zijn beter.
Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd beter is dan het gemiddelde (38.2 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.
Geekbench 5.3
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
940 Points ∼71%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
1326 Points ∼100% +41%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
911 Points ∼69% -3%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
781 Points ∼59% -17%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (903 - 944, n=5)
929 Points ∼70% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (58 - 1604, n=216, last 2 years)
559 Points ∼42% -41%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
2815 Points ∼81%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
3476 Points ∼100% +23%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
3360 Points ∼97% +19%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
3062 Points ∼88% +9%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (2731 - 2899, n=5)
2800 Points ∼81% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (248 - 4201, n=216, last 2 years)
1925 Points ∼55% -32%
OpenCL Score 5.1 (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
Points ∼0%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
2960 Points ∼66%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
4491 Points ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone
  (285 - 4739, n=53, last 2 years)
1712 Points ∼38%
Vulkan Score 5.1 (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
3804 Points ∼94%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
2641 Points ∼65% -31%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
4043 Points ∼100% +6%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (3670 - 3804, n=2)
3737 Points ∼92% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (70 - 4043, n=56, last 2 years)
1611 Points ∼40% -58%
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
4791 Points ∼98%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
4278 Points ∼88% -11%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
3898 Points ∼80% -19%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (4791 - 4965, n=2)
4878 Points ∼100% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (412 - 5099, n=79, last 2 years)
2531 Points ∼52% -47%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
12557 Points ∼95%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
13279 Points ∼100% +6%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
12280 Points ∼92% -2%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (12557 - 12561, n=2)
12559 Points ∼95% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1163 - 14895, n=79, last 2 years)
7737 Points ∼58% -38%
Compute RenderScript Score (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
8648 Points ∼71%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
9491 Points ∼78% +10%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
12228 Points ∼100% +41%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
 
8648 Points ∼71% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2166 - 12228, n=66, last 2 years)
6676 Points ∼55% -23%
PCMark for Android
Work performance score (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
14307 Points ∼99%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
13360 Points ∼93% -7%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
13947 Points ∼97% -3%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
12645 Points ∼88% -12%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
11795 Points ∼82% -18%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (13627 - 14760, n=5)
14391 Points ∼100% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2689 - 19989, n=235, last 2 years)
9901 Points ∼69% -31%
Work 2.0 performance score (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
10255 Points ∼90%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
11387 Points ∼100% +11%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
10322 Points ∼91% +1%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
10442 Points ∼92% +2%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9259 Points ∼81% -10%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (10008 - 11784, n=5)
10612 Points ∼93% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (82 - 15299, n=269, last 2 years)
7807 Points ∼69% -24%
3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
66452 Points ∼69%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
96826 Points ∼100% +46%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
75632 Points ∼78% +14%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
64626 Points ∼67% -3%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
72173 Points ∼75% +9%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
68517 Points ∼71% +3%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (41415 - 68943, n=4)
61100 Points ∼63% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2920 - 117606, n=220, last 2 years)
39384 Points ∼41% -41%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
79572 Points ∼39%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
206190 Points ∼100% +159%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
145567 Points ∼71% +83%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
75073 Points ∼36% -6%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
118129 Points ∼57% +48%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
103509 Points ∼50% +30%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (48476 - 87223, n=4)
74951 Points ∼36% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2177 - 224130, n=220, last 2 years)
56664 Points ∼27% -29%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
42135 Points ∼97%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
33898 Points ∼78% -20%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
28147 Points ∼65% -33%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
43459 Points ∼100% +3%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
30561 Points ∼70% -27%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
31384 Points ∼72% -26%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (27431 - 42135, n=4)
37265 Points ∼86% -12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (8324 - 59268, n=220, last 2 years)
22977 Points ∼53% -45%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
8010 Points ∼90%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
7893 Points ∼89% -1%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
8866 Points ∼100% +11%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6815 Points ∼77% -15%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
8165 Points ∼92% +2%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
6780 Points ∼76% -15%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (5646 - 8097, n=5)
6920 Points ∼78% -14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 11256, n=260, last 2 years)
3314 Points ∼37% -59%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
11488 Points ∼100%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
11302 Points ∼98% -2%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
11458 Points ∼100% 0%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
7671 Points ∼67% -33%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
10637 Points ∼93% -7%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9806 Points ∼85% -15%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (6388 - 11488, n=5)
9004 Points ∼78% -22%
Average of class Smartphone
  (54 - 16670, n=260, last 2 years)
3889 Points ∼34% -66%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
3889 Points ∼77%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
3839 Points ∼76% -1%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
5054 Points ∼100% +30%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
4900 Points ∼97% +26%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
4503 Points ∼89% +16%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3260 Points ∼65% -16%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (3846 - 4124, n=5)
3990 Points ∼79% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (607 - 5301, n=260, last 2 years)
2721 Points ∼54% -30%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
7563 Points ∼79%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
9616 Points ∼100% +27%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
7098 Points ∼74% -6%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
8605 Points ∼89% +14%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
6795 Points ∼71% -10%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (7385 - 8485, n=5)
7798 Points ∼81% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (149 - 11895, n=272, last 2 years)
3796 Points ∼39% -50%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
9470 Points ∼75%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
12573 Points ∼100% +33%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
7970 Points ∼63% -16%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
11448 Points ∼91% +21%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9724 Points ∼77% +3%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (9470 - 11868, n=5)
10329 Points ∼82% +9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (122 - 22052, n=272, last 2 years)
4779 Points ∼38% -50%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
4436 Points ∼85%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
5209 Points ∼100% +17%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
5133 Points ∼99% +16%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
4604 Points ∼88% +4%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3308 Points ∼64% -25%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (3935 - 4455, n=5)
4240 Points ∼81% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (620 - 5765, n=270, last 2 years)
2839 Points ∼55% -36%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
6836 Points ∼97%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
5471 Points ∼78% -20%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
7012 Points ∼100% +3%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6048 Points ∼86% -12%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
6266 Points ∼89% -8%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5743 Points ∼82% -16%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (6544 - 6896, n=5)
6733 Points ∼96% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (78 - 9138, n=258, last 2 years)
2619 Points ∼37% -62%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
8257 Points ∼100%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
6088 Points ∼74% -26%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
8045 Points ∼97% -3%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6478 Points ∼78% -22%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
7044 Points ∼85% -15%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
6275 Points ∼76% -24%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (8005 - 8469, n=5)
8260 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (62 - 11573, n=258, last 2 years)
2789 Points ∼34% -66%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
4267 Points ∼87%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
4038 Points ∼82% -5%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
4582 Points ∼93% +7%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
4909 Points ∼100% +15%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
4519 Points ∼92% +6%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4429 Points ∼90% +4%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (3963 - 4267, n=5)
4091 Points ∼83% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (435 - 5318, n=258, last 2 years)
2772 Points ∼56% -35%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
7412 Points ∼93%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
7982 Points ∼100% +8%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6382 Points ∼80% -14%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
6916 Points ∼87% -7%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5851 Points ∼73% -21%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (6638 - 7459, n=5)
7083 Points ∼89% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (91 - 9839, n=270, last 2 years)
3106 Points ∼39% -58%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
9157 Points ∼98%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
9345 Points ∼100% +2%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6657 Points ∼71% -27%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
8006 Points ∼86% -13%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
6857 Points ∼73% -25%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (870 - 9190, n=5)
7112 Points ∼76% -22%
Average of class Smartphone
  (73 - 12914, n=270, last 2 years)
3455 Points ∼37% -62%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
4447 Points ∼80%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
5187 Points ∼93% +17%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
5576 Points ∼100% +25%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
4683 Points ∼84% +5%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3866 Points ∼69% -13%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (4063 - 4495, n=5)
4284 Points ∼77% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (620 - 5780, n=270, last 2 years)
2903 Points ∼52% -35%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
6280 Points ∼97%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
6444 Points ∼100% +3%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
5570 Points ∼86% -11%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
5509 Points ∼85% -12%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4838 Points ∼75% -23%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (5042 - 6355, n=5)
5599 Points ∼87% -11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (419 - 6977, n=212, last 2 years)
2638 Points ∼41% -58%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
8659 Points ∼100%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
8076 Points ∼93% -7%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6369 Points ∼74% -26%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
6527 Points ∼75% -25%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5733 Points ∼66% -34%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (6136 - 8783, n=5)
7254 Points ∼84% -16%
Average of class Smartphone
  (341 - 11259, n=212, last 2 years)
2976 Points ∼34% -66%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
3201 Points ∼83%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
3843 Points ∼99% +20%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
3870 Points ∼100% +21%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
3564 Points ∼92% +11%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3128 Points ∼81% -2%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (3104 - 3230, n=5)
3154 Points ∼81% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1786 - 4061, n=212, last 2 years)
2646 Points ∼68% -17%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
119 fps ∼100%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
59 fps ∼50% -50%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
60 fps ∼50% -50%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
60 fps ∼50% -50%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
60 fps ∼50% -50%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
60 fps ∼50% -50%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (60 - 119, n=5)
81.8 fps ∼69% -31%
Average of class Smartphone
  (8.2 - 143, n=218, last 2 years)
55.8 fps ∼47% -53%
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
200 fps ∼70%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
287 fps ∼100% +44%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
202 fps ∼70% +1%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
152 fps ∼53% -24%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
185 fps ∼64% -7%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
151 fps ∼53% -24%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (145 - 200, n=5)
187 fps ∼65% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4.3 - 322, n=218, last 2 years)
103 fps ∼36% -48%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
59 fps ∼90%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
60 fps ∼91% +2%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
58 fps ∼88% -2%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
60 fps ∼91% +2%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
57 fps ∼87% -3%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
60 fps ∼91% +2%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (59 - 90, n=5)
65.8 fps ∼100% +12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4.5 - 120, n=216, last 2 years)
44.1 fps ∼67% -25%
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
100 fps ∼64%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
157 fps ∼100% +57%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
123 fps ∼78% +23%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
106 fps ∼68% +6%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
111 fps ∼71% +11%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
85 fps ∼54% -15%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (96 - 126, n=5)
109 fps ∼69% +9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 180, n=217, last 2 years)
60.4 fps ∼38% -40%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
58 fps ∼79%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
60 fps ∼82% +3%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
45 fps ∼62% -22%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
73 fps ∼100% +26%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
40 fps ∼55% -31%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
36 fps ∼49% -38%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (58 - 61, n=5)
59 fps ∼81% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.1 - 106, n=214, last 2 years)
34.5 fps ∼47% -41%
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
72 fps ∼72%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
100 fps ∼100% +39%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
86 fps ∼86% +19%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
56 fps ∼56% -22%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
79 fps ∼79% +10%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
51 fps ∼51% -29%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (65 - 85, n=5)
77.4 fps ∼77% +8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 121, n=214, last 2 years)
41.3 fps ∼41% -43%
GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
44 fps ∼92%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
48 fps ∼100% +9%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
26 fps ∼54% -41%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
34 fps ∼71% -23%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
24 fps ∼50% -45%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
33 fps ∼69% -25%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (34 - 45, n=5)
42 fps ∼88% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.5 - 61, n=213, last 2 years)
21.6 fps ∼45% -51%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
50 fps ∼79%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
63 fps ∼100% +26%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
51 fps ∼81% +2%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
41 fps ∼65% -18%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
48 fps ∼76% -4%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
36 fps ∼57% -28%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (38 - 51, n=5)
47.6 fps ∼76% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.8 - 75, n=213, last 2 years)
24.8 fps ∼39% -50%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
51 fps ∼88%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
58 fps ∼100% +14%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
28 fps ∼48% -45%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
40 fps ∼69% -22%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
26 fps ∼45% -49%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
38 fps ∼66% -25%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (49 - 52, n=5)
50.8 fps ∼88% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.5 - 73, n=274, last 2 years)
21.6 fps ∼37% -58%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
56 fps ∼75%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
75 fps ∼100% +34%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
53 fps ∼71% -5%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
49 fps ∼65% -12%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
47 fps ∼63% -16%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
42 fps ∼56% -25%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (43 - 58, n=5)
53.4 fps ∼71% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.95 - 257, n=274, last 2 years)
24.8 fps ∼33% -56%
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
33 fps ∼72%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
46 fps ∼100% +39%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
18 fps ∼39% -45%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
26 fps ∼57% -21%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
17 fps ∼37% -48%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
25 fps ∼54% -24%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (22 - 34, n=5)
29.8 fps ∼65% -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 60, n=275, last 2 years)
14.3 fps ∼31% -57%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
22 fps ∼76%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
29 fps ∼100% +32%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
20 fps ∼69% -9%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
19 fps ∼66% -14%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
19 fps ∼66% -14%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
16 fps ∼55% -27%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (20 - 23, n=5)
21.8 fps ∼75% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.35 - 101, n=274, last 2 years)
9.85 fps ∼34% -55%
Basemark GPU 1.2
1920x1080 Vulkan Medium Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
71.55 (21.96min - 153.62max) fps ∼99%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
72.56 (32.87min - 131.8max) fps ∼100% +1%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
52.62 (9.22min - 88.62max) fps ∼73% -26%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
 
71.6 fps ∼99% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (8.79 - 84.4, n=39, last 2 years)
35.8 fps ∼49% -50%
1920x1080 OpenGL Medium Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
85.44 (20.45min - 139.09max) fps ∼100%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
75.88 (34.23min - 132.54max) fps ∼89% -11%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
63.13 (18.68min - 143.33max) fps ∼74% -26%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
 
85.4 fps ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4.7 - 98.8, n=40, last 2 years)
37.3 fps ∼44% -56%
OpenGL Medium Native (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
49.21 (16.35min - 130.08max) fps ∼91%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
43.11 (22.09min - 84.76max) fps ∼80% -12%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
53.86 (18.27min - 79.77max) fps ∼100% +9%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
 
49.2 fps ∼91% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5 - 74.1, n=39, last 2 years)
31.7 fps ∼59% -36%
Vulkan Medium Native (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
42.64 (18.1min - 74.99max) fps ∼93%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
41.67 (24.54min - 66.22max) fps ∼91% -2%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
45.92 (7.8min - 77.95max) fps ∼100% +8%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
 
42.6 fps ∼93% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (10.5 - 68.7, n=39, last 2 years)
29.8 fps ∼65% -30%
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
498708 Points ∼83%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
510245 Points ∼85% +2%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
599843 Points ∼100% +20%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
483224 Points ∼81% -3%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
486654 Points ∼81% -2%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
418779 Points ∼70% -16%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (296746 - 527820, n=5)
469996 Points ∼78% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53335 - 727247, n=179, last 2 years)
333830 Points ∼56% -33%
VRMark - Amber Room (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
4957 Score ∼99%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
4988 Score ∼100% +1%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
4997 Score ∼100% +1%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
4986 Score ∼100% +1%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (4607 - 4957, n=3)
4783 Score ∼96% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (421 - 7649, n=56, last 2 years)
3290 Score ∼66% -34%
BaseMark OS II
Overall (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
4915 Points ∼88%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
5607 Points ∼100% +14%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
5540 Points ∼99% +13%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
5389 Points ∼96% +10%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
4992 Points ∼89% +2%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4841 Points ∼86% -2%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (4764 - 4915, n=5)
4815 Points ∼86% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (323 - 6959, n=202, last 2 years)
3551 Points ∼63% -28%
System (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
9478 Points ∼67%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
14189 Points ∼100% +50%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
9555 Points ∼67% +1%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
9309 Points ∼66% -2%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
9294 Points ∼66% -2%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9113 Points ∼64% -4%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (8843 - 9478, n=5)
9209 Points ∼65% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1160 - 14189, n=202, last 2 years)
6512 Points ∼46% -31%
Memory (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
4497 Points ∼71%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
2350 Points ∼37% -48%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
6350 Points ∼100% +41%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6130 Points ∼97% +36%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
5091 Points ∼80% +13%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5140 Points ∼81% +14%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (3775 - 4497, n=5)
4037 Points ∼64% -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (522 - 9044, n=202, last 2 years)
4156 Points ∼65% -8%
Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
10781 Points ∼63%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
16996 Points ∼100% +58%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
11496 Points ∼68% +7%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
10112 Points ∼59% -6%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
10618 Points ∼62% -2%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9339 Points ∼55% -13%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (10646 - 10803, n=5)
10744 Points ∼63% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (349 - 16996, n=202, last 2 years)
5486 Points ∼32% -49%
Web (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
1270 Points ∼73%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
1745 Points ∼100% +37%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
1351 Points ∼77% +6%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
1462 Points ∼84% +15%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
1236 Points ∼71% -3%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
1256 Points ∼72% -1%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (1270 - 1439, n=5)
1351 Points ∼77% +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (10 - 2169, n=202, last 2 years)
1252 Points ∼72% -1%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 13.1)
129.096 Points ∼100% +149%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro (Chrome 78)
65.88 Points ∼51% +27%
Oppo Find X2 Pro (Chrome 80)
64.567 Points ∼50% +25%
LG G8X ThinQ (Chrome 78)
63.096 Points ∼49% +22%
OnePlus 7T Pro (Chrome 78)
62.417 Points ∼48% +20%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (50.6 - 56.8, n=5)
53.8 Points ∼42% +4%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra (Chrome 80)
51.826 Points ∼40%
Average of class Smartphone (12.4 - 161, n=185, last 2 years)
49.7 Points ∼38% -4%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 13.1)
301.91 Points ∼100% +237%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro (Chrome 78)
115.49 Points ∼38% +29%
OnePlus 7T Pro (Chrome 78)
115.44 Points ∼38% +29%
Oppo Find X2 Pro (Chrome 80)
114.65 Points ∼38% +28%
LG G8X ThinQ (Chrome 78)
106.73 Points ∼35% +19%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (89.3 - 96.2, n=5)
92.8 Points ∼31% +4%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra (Chrome 80)
89.62 Points ∼30%
Average of class Smartphone (10.8 - 375, n=192, last 2 years)
88.6 Points ∼29% -1%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 13.1)
153 runs/min ∼100% +140%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro (Chrome 78)
74.1 runs/min ∼48% +16%
Oppo Find X2 Pro (Chrome 80)
71 runs/min ∼46% +11%
LG G8X ThinQ (Chome 78)
66.8 runs/min ∼44% +5%
OnePlus 7T Pro (Chome 78)
66.4 runs/min ∼43% +4%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra (Chrome 80)
63.7 runs/min ∼42%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (50.8 - 64.4, n=4)
60.4 runs/min ∼39% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (9 - 196, n=163, last 2 years)
50.9 runs/min ∼33% -20%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 13.1)
181 Points ∼100% +110%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro (Chrome 78)
119 Points ∼66% +38%
Oppo Find X2 Pro (Chrome 80)
100 Points ∼55% +16%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (86 - 102, n=5)
94.4 Points ∼52% +10%
OnePlus 7T Pro (Chrome 78)
93 Points ∼51% +8%
LG G8X ThinQ (Chrome 78)
90 Points ∼50% +5%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra (Chrome 80)
86 Points ∼48%
Average of class Smartphone (20 - 194, n=203, last 2 years)
77.6 Points ∼43% -10%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 13.1)
49388 Points ∼100% +158%
OnePlus 7T Pro (Chrome 78)
23999 Points ∼49% +26%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro (Chrome 78)
23568 Points ∼48% +23%
LG G8X ThinQ (Chrome 78)
23506 Points ∼48% +23%
Oppo Find X2 Pro (Chrome 80)
22976 Points ∼47% +20%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra (Chrome 80)
19122 Points ∼39%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (18094 - 20022, n=5)
19019 Points ∼39% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (1986 - 58632, n=212, last 2 years)
17077 Points ∼35% -11%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (460 - 29635, n=215, last 2 years)
4167 ms * ∼100% -78%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (2294 - 2511, n=5)
2387 ms * ∼57% -2%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra (Chrome 80)
2344.7 ms * ∼56%
LG G8X ThinQ (Chrome 78)
2201.2 ms * ∼53% +6%
OnePlus 7T Pro (Chrome 78)
2133.5 ms * ∼51% +9%
Oppo Find X2 Pro (Chrome 80)
2043.6 ms * ∼49% +13%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro (Chrome 78)
1962.5 ms * ∼47% +16%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 13.1)
570.9 ms * ∼14% +76%

* ... kleiner is beter

Samsung Galaxy S20 UltraOppo Find X2 ProHuawei Mate 30 ProOnePlus 7T ProLG G8X ThinQAverage 128 GB UFS 3.0 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-1%
6%
-39%
-35%
-9%
-30%
Sequential Read 256KB
1632.02
1605.6
-2%
1780.5
9%
1489
-9%
704.8
-57%
1521 (1406 - 1692, n=11)
-7%
729 (41.9 - 2037, n=280, last 2 years)
-55%
Sequential Write 256KB
697.08
728.72
5%
401.79
-42%
405
-42%
497.1
-29%
514 (213 - 697, n=11)
-26%
314 (11.9 - 1321, n=280, last 2 years)
-55%
Random Read 4KB
202.43
202.63
0%
226.38
12%
169
-17%
160.5
-21%
198 (170 - 238, n=11)
-2%
130 (13.5 - 325, n=280, last 2 years)
-36%
Random Write 4KB
221.37
204.98
-7%
259.21
17%
26
-88%
30.2
-86%
185 (29.9 - 230, n=11)
-16%
115 (4.97 - 330, n=280, last 2 years)
-48%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
67.55 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
82.49 (Nano Memory Card)
22%
68.9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
2%
67.3 (34.6 - 81.6, n=8)
0%
76 (13.4 - 154, n=182, last 2 years)
13%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
58.25 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
69.22 (Nano Memory Card)
19%
47.7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-18%
55.7 (30.7 - 66.4, n=8)
-4%
58 (1.7 - 83.3, n=182, last 2 years)
0%
05101520253035404550556040403940404040404040404040404040404040364040394140403940404140403940404139404040404040403940404140394040403941404040404040404040404040394140403940404040404040404039414040404040394136403940404041394139413939413941394040404139404040404040404040403940414039404039404040404039414040404040394040404040404040404039404040404139404040403940413940404040404040404040404039383539404040404040384140393839394139404040404039403940393939394040403840394040384140394039403840404040403838384140394038344041394040404040404040404040404040404039404040404040364040384239394139414039403940413940404140394039404041394139404041394040404040404040394040404140394040404040404039404041394040394140404040404040404040394040404139404039414040394140394041393940404040413940404040414039404040404040404040404040404040394040404040394040404040403940404140404039413941404040403741394139404040403842404038414040404139404040404040403941403841394240394040404040404040404040404040404040403941404040394038404040403941394040404040413940384139413941404040404040404039404040394139404039414039403939404041394040384137424039404040404040394140394040404040404040404039404039404040404040404040404040404040403640403941404039404041404039404041394040404040404039404041403940404039414040404040404040404040403941404039404040404040404040394140404040403941364039404040413941394139394139413940404041394040404040404040404039404140394040394040404040394140404040403940404040404040404040394040404041394040404039404139404040404040404040404040393835394040404040403841403938393941394040404040394039403939393940404038403940403841403940394038404040404038383841403940383440413940404040404040404040404040404040394040404040403640403842393941394140394039404139404041403940394040413941394040413940404040404040403940404041403940404040404040394040413940403941404040404040404040403940404041394040394140403941403940413939404040404139404040404140394040404040404040404040404040403940404040403940404040404039404041404040394139414040404037413941394040404038424040384140404041394040404040404039414038413942403940404040404040404040404040404040404039414040403940384040404039413940404040404139403841394139414040404040404040394040403941394040394140394039394040413940403841374240394040404040403941403940404040404040404040396060606060606060606160606060606060606160606058606060606060606060606060616060606060534960404039404040404040404040404040404040403640403941404039404041404039404041394040404040404039404041403940404039414040404040404040404040403941404039404040404040404040394140404040403941364039404040413941394139394139413940404041394040404040404040404039404140394040394040404040394140404040403940404040404040404040394040404041394040404039404139404040404040404040404040393835394040404040403841403938393941394040404040394039403939393940404038403940403841403940394038404040404038383841403940383440413940404040404040404040404040404040394040404040403640403842393941394140394039404139404041403940394040413941394040413940404040404040403940404041403940404040404040394040413940403941404040404040404040403940404041394040394140403941403940413939404040404139404040404140394040404040404040404040404040403940404040403940404040404039404041404040394139414040404037413941394040404038424040384140404041394040404040404039414038413942403940404040404040404040404040404040404039414040403940384040404039413940404040404139403841394139414040404040404040394040403941394040394140394039394040413940403841374240394040404040403941403940404040404040404040396060606060606060606160606060606060606160606058606060606060606060606060616060606060534960605958606060606056616060606060606060615960606060606060616060606060606061606060606060606061606060606060606061606060606060606061606060606060606160606060606060616060606060606061606060605760596159585959606060616060606059605960596059596060585958596060605860615758606058605960595960606060606160606060606061606060606060606160606060606060616060606060606061606060606060616060606060605961586059606060606160606060606060616060606060606061606060606060606160606060606060606160606060606060616060606060606061606060606060Tooltip
; PUBG Mobile; 0.17.0: Ø39.8 (34-42)
; Real Racing 3; 8.2.1: Ø59.6 (49-61)
; World of Tanks Blitz; 6.9.0.501: Ø59.9 (56-61)
Max. Belasting
 33.8 °C33.5 °C32.5 °C 
 34.8 °C34.3 °C32.3 °C 
 35 °C35 °C32.3 °C 
Maximum: 35 °C
Gemiddelde: 33.7 °C
30.7 °C31.8 °C31.9 °C
29.7 °C31.7 °C32 °C
29.9 °C32.2 °C34.1 °C
Maximum: 34.1 °C
Gemiddelde: 31.6 °C
Stroomadapter (max.)  27.7 °C | Kamertemperatuur 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 33.7 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 34.1 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.1 °C / 86 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2033.431.52529.629.33129.828.54025.526.15033.232.16326.824.98025.523.310023.724.312519.13316018.953.320017.250.925017.552.83151757.540015.159.7500156463014.764.380015.565.7100015.567.3125014.771.5160014.575.1200014.675.7250014.574.3315013.775.7400014.772.3500014.572.3630014.569.8800014.570.61000014.869.51250014.962.71600015.556SPL26.984.4N0.958.1median 14.9median 65.7Delta1.38.532.239.436.225.529.126.83027.742.342.426.827.220.325.22536.717.244.817.954.317.153.817.95316.253.616.55615.35915.664.415.664.814.867.214.472.314.67314.776.914.176.414.476.914.475.914.973.514.773.814.57214.866.6156316.649.427.185.80.961median 15median 64.81.29.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSamsung Galaxy S20 UltraApple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 10% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 35% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.7% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 12% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 39% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Stroomgebruik
Uit / Standbydarklight 0.01 / 0.25 Watt
Inactiefdarkmid