Notebookcheck

Kort testrapport Samsung Galaxy S10 5G Smartphone: een opgedreven S10 met een high-tech toevoeging

Daniel Schmidt, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (vertaald door Siemon Boes), 31-07-2019

Eerste! Samsung heeft de Galaxy S10 5G voorgesteld op MWC 19, maar het heeft een heel eind geduurd voor de smartphone in Europa beschikbaar werd. De Galaxy S10 5G is groter, heeft meer camera's en een grotere batterij dan de gewone S10, maar er zijn ook enkele nadelen. Samsung is er evenmin in geslaagd om de problemen met de rest van de S10-serie aan te pakken. Lees verder om meer details te weten te komen.

Samsung Galaxy S10 5G (Galaxy S Serie)
Processor
Samsung Exynos 9820
Grafische kaart
ARM Mali-G76 MP12
Geheugen
8192 MB 
, LPDDR4x, 2,093 MHz
Beeldscherm
6.7 inch 19:9, 3040 x 1440 pixel 502 PPI, Capacitive touchscreen, 10-point multitouch, Dual Edge Dynamic AMOLED, OLED, glimmend: ja, HDR
Opslag
256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 256 GB 
, 226.1 GB beschikbaar
Verbindingen
1 USB 3.0, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Audio Verbindingen: 3.5-mm-audio-poort en USB Type-C, 1 Vingerafdruklezer, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensoren: Accelerometer, Barometer, Gyro-Sensor, Geomagnetische Sensor, Hall-Sensor, Hartslagmeter, Afstandssensor, MST, Glonass, BeiDou, Galileo, Ant+, Samsung DeX
Netwerkmogelijkheden
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5.0, Samsung Exynos 5100 5G Modem: GSM/GPRS/Edge: 850, 900, 1,800, 1,900 MHz. UMTS/HSPA+: 850, 900, 1,880, 1,900, 2,010, 2,100, AWS. LTE Cat. 20: Bands 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 66. 5G: N78., LTE, 5G, GPS
Afmetingen
hoogte x breedte x diepte (in mm): 7.9 x 162.6 x 77.1
Batterij
17.33 Wh, 4500 mAh Lithium-Ion, 3.85 V
Charging
wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge
Besturingssysteem
Android 9.0 Pie
Camera
Primary Camera: 12 MPix (Dual-pixel autofocus, 77°, f/1.5 and f/2.4, 1/2.55", 1.4 μm, OIS). 12 MPix telephoto lens, 2x magnification, PDAF, 45°, f/2.4, 1/3.6", OIS. 16 MPix ultra-wide-angle lens, fixed focus, 123°, f/2.2, 1/3.1". ToF camera (f/1.2, 1/6.0". UHD videos
Secondary Camera: 10 MPix (Dual-pixel autofocus, 80°, f/1.9, 1/3.24". ToF camera (f/1.6, 1/6.0"); Camera2 API: Full
Bijkomende functionaliteiten
Luidsprekers: Stereo-luidsprekers, Toetsenbord: on-screen, One UI 1.1, 24 Maanden Garantie, SAR-waardes: Lichaam – 1.55 W/kg, Hoofd - 0.264 W/kg. VoLTE, VoWiFi, IP68-certificatie, Bixby, fanless, waterproof
Gewicht
198 g
Prijs
1199 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Formaat Vergelijking

174.6 mm 85.4 mm 8.2 mm 232 g162.6 mm 75.9 mm 8.8 mm 206 g162.6 mm 77.1 mm 7.9 mm 198 g159.2 mm 73.4 mm 7.9 mm 178 g157.6 mm 74.1 mm 7.8 mm 198 g157.5 mm 77.4 mm 7.7 mm 208 g155.3 mm 76.6 mm 7.99 mm 181 g
Standaard DeX-startscherm
Standaard DeX-startscherm
Multi-tasking met DeX
Multi-tasking met DeX
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Mali-G76 MP12, 9820, 512 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
633 (min: 561, max: 684) MBit/s ∼100% +12%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
A12 Bionic GPU, A12 Bionic, 64 GB eMMC Flash
624 MBit/s ∼99% +10%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Adreno 640, 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
613 (min: 284, max: 694) MBit/s ∼97% +8%
LG G8s ThinQ
Adreno 640, 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
578 (min: 474, max: 617) MBit/s ∼91% +2%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Mali-G76 MP12, 9820, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
567 (min: 371, max: 667) MBit/s ∼90%
Huawei Mate 20 X
Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
566 (min: 514, max: 586) MBit/s ∼89% 0%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Adreno 640, 855, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
467 (min: 375, max: 519) MBit/s ∼74% -18%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 939, n=419)
223 MBit/s ∼35% -61%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Huawei Mate 20 X
Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
633 (min: 564, max: 663) MBit/s ∼100% +16%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
A12 Bionic GPU, A12 Bionic, 64 GB eMMC Flash
602 MBit/s ∼95% +10%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Mali-G76 MP12, 9820, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
548 (min: 399, max: 599) MBit/s ∼87%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Adreno 640, 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
527 (min: 481, max: 556) MBit/s ∼83% -4%
LG G8s ThinQ
Adreno 640, 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
502 (min: 465, max: 517) MBit/s ∼79% -8%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Adreno 640, 855, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
471 (min: 438, max: 506) MBit/s ∼74% -14%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Mali-G76 MP12, 9820, 512 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
457 (min: 398, max: 508) MBit/s ∼72% -17%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 703, n=419)
212 MBit/s ∼33% -61%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø567 (371-667)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø548 (399-599)
GPS-test: Garmin Edge 500 - overzicht
GPS-test: Garmin Edge 500 - overzicht
GPS-test: Garmin Edge 500 - fietsen rond een meer
GPS-test: Garmin Edge 500 - fietsen rond een meer
GPS-test: Garmin Edge 500 - lus
GPS-test: Garmin Edge 500 - lus
GPS-test: Samsung Galaxy S10 5G - fietsen rond een meer
GPS-test: Samsung Galaxy S10 5G - fietsen rond een meer
GPS-test: Samsung Galaxy S10 5G - lus
GPS-test: Samsung Galaxy S10 5G - lus
 

Beeldvergelijking

Bekijk een scène en navigeer binnen het eerste beeld. Eén klik wijzigt het zoomniveau. Eén klik op het ingezoomde beeld opent het origineel in een nieuw venster. Het eerste beeld toont de verschaalde foto van het testtoestel.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3Scene 4
klik om beelden te laden
Foto genomen met standaardlens
Foto genomen met standaardlens
Foto genomen met optische zoom
Foto genomen met optische zoom
Foto genomen met de ultra-groothoeklens
Foto genomen met de ultra-groothoeklens
Foto genomen met optische zoom
Ons testbeeld gefotografeerd met de standaardcamera
Ons testbeeld gefotografeerd met de standaardcamera
Ons testbeeld in detail
ColorChecker Passport: de onderste helft van elk kleurvlak is de referentiekleur
Ons testbeeld gefotografeerd met de standaardcamera bij 1 lux
710
cd/m²
737
cd/m²
751
cd/m²
719
cd/m²
735
cd/m²
753
cd/m²
725
cd/m²
737
cd/m²
745
cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling
Dual Edge Dynamic AMOLED
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 753 cd/m² Gemiddelde: 734.7 cd/m² Minimum: 1.62 cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling: 94 %
Helderheid in Batterij-modus: 735 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Zwart: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.9 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6.1
ΔE Greyscale 1.4 | 0.64-98 Ø6.3
96.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.09
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
OLED, 3040x1440, 6.7
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
OLED, 3040x1440, 6.4
Huawei Mate 20 X
OLED, 2244x1080, 7.2
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.47
OnePlus 7 Pro
AMOLED, 3120x1440, 6.67
Apple iPhone Xs Max
OLED, 2688x1242, 6.5
LG G8s ThinQ
P-OLED, 2248x1080, 6.2
Screen
0%
11%
-37%
15%
14%
-13%
Brightness middle
735
710
-3%
421
-43%
402
-45%
586
-20%
656
-11%
539
-27%
Brightness
735
721
-2%
418
-43%
399
-46%
584
-21%
659
-10%
556
-24%
Brightness Distribution
94
97
3%
96
2%
92
-2%
97
3%
88
-6%
88
-6%
Black Level *
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
3.9
3.7
5%
1.1
72%
4.1
-5%
1.39
64%
1.7
56%
3.78
3%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
10.9
10.3
6%
2.2
80%
6.5
40%
2.7
75%
2.8
74%
6.95
36%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
1.4
1.5
-7%
1.4
-0%
3.7
-164%
1.6
-14%
1.7
-21%
2.2
-57%
Gamma
2.09 105%
2.1 105%
2.23 99%
2.23 99%
2.243 98%
1.998 110%
2.274 97%
CCT
6549 99%
6611 98%
6723 97%
7841 83%
6672 97%
6487 100%
6013 108%

* ... kleiner is beter

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Om de schermhelderheid te verlagen schakelen sommige laptops het backlight erg snel aan en uit. Dit gebeurt aan een dergelijk hoge frequentie dat het niet zichtbaar is voor het menselijk oog. Als de frequentie te laag is kunnen personen met gevoelige ogen geïrriteerd geraken, hoofdpijn krijgen en zelfs flickering waarnemen.
Screen flickering / PWM waargenomen 240.4 Hz ≤ 99 % helderheid instelling

Het backlight van het scherm flikkert aan 240.4 Hz (hoogstwaarschijnlijk met PWM - Pulse-Width Modulation) aan een helderheid van 99 % en lager. Boven deze helderheid zou er geen flickering / PWM mogen optreden.

De frequentie van 240.4 Hz is redelijk laag en de meeste mensen die gevoelig zijn aan flickering kunnen dit dus waarnemen of geïrriteerde ogen krijgen (gebruikmakend van de vermelde helderheid en lager).

Ter vergelijking: 51 % van alle geteste toestellen maakten geen gebruik van PWM om de schermhelderheid te verlagen. Als het wel werd gebruikt, werd een gemiddelde van 9435 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz waargenomen.

CalMAN: Grayscale – Adaptive profile (Adjusted): DCI-P3 kleurruimte
CalMAN: Grayscale – Adaptive profile (Adjusted): DCI-P3 kleurruimte
CalMAN: Mixed Colours – Adaptive profile (Adjusted): DCI-P3 kleurruimte
CalMAN: Mixed Colours – Adaptive profile (Adjusted): DCI-P3 kleurruimte
CalMAN: Colour Space – Adaptive profile (Adjusted): DCI-P3 kleurruimte
CalMAN: Colour Space – Adaptive profile (Adjusted): DCI-P3 kleurruimte
CalMAN: Colour Saturation – Adaptive profile (Adjusted): DCI-P3 kleurruimte
CalMAN: Colour Saturation – Adaptive profile (Adjusted): DCI-P3 kleurruimte
CalMAN: Grayscale – Adaptive profile (Standard): DCI-P3 kleurruimte
CalMAN: Grayscale – Adaptive profile (Standard): DCI-P3 kleurruimte
CalMAN: Mixed Colours – Adaptive profile (Standard): DCI-P3 kleurruimte
CalMAN: Mixed Colours – Adaptive profile (Standard): DCI-P3 kleurruimte
CalMAN: Colour Space – Adaptive profile (Standard): DCI-P3 kleurruimte
CalMAN: Colour Space – Adaptive profile (Standard): DCI-P3 kleurruimte
CalMAN: Colour Saturation – Adaptive profile (Standard): DCI-P3 kleurruimte
CalMAN: Colour Saturation – Adaptive profile (Standard): DCI-P3 kleurruimte
CalMAN: Grayscale – Natural profile: sRGB-kleurruimte
CalMAN: Grayscale – Natural profile: sRGB-kleurruimte
CalMAN: Mixed Colours – Natural profile: sRGB-kleurruimte
CalMAN: Mixed Colours – Natural profile: sRGB-kleurruimte
CalMAN: Colour Space – Natural profile: sRGB-kleurruimte
CalMAN: Colour Space – Natural profile: sRGB-kleurruimte
CalMAN: Colour Saturation – Natural profile: sRGB-kleurruimte
CalMAN: Colour Saturation – Natural profile: sRGB-kleurruimte

Responstijd Scherm

De responstijden van het scherm tonen hoe snel het scherm in staat is om van één kleur naar de andere te veranderen. Trage responstijden kunnen aanleiding geven tot 'nabeelden' rond bewegende objecten of het scherm wazig maken (blur). Vooral spelers van snelle 3D-games hebben baat bij een scherm met snelle responstijden.
       Responstijd Zwart naar Wit
4 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd↗ 2 ms stijging
↘ 2 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde erg snelle responstijden in onze tests en zou zeer geschikt moeten zijn voor snelle games.
Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.8 (minimum) tot 240 (maximum) ms. » 2 % van alle toestellen zijn beter.
Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd beter is dan het gemiddelde (25.1 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.
       Responstijd 50% Grijs naar 80% Grijs
4 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd↗ 2 ms stijging
↘ 2 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde erg snelle responstijden in onze tests en zou zeer geschikt moeten zijn voor snelle games.
Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.9 (minimum) tot 636 (maximum) ms. » 1 % van alle toestellen zijn beter.
Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd beter is dan het gemiddelde (40 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.
Geekbench 4.3
Compute RenderScript Score (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
10192 Points ∼100%
Huawei Mate 20 X
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
5759 Points ∼57% -43%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7553 Points ∼74% -26%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
7470 Points ∼73% -27%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7442 Points ∼73% -27%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
10177 Points ∼100% 0%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (10128 - 10192, n=4)
10167 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (663 - 21070, n=317)
4565 Points ∼45% -55%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
10489 Points ∼93%
Huawei Mate 20 X
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
9852 Points ∼88% -6%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
10765 Points ∼96% +3%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
10812 Points ∼96% +3%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
11244 Points ∼100% +7%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
10274 Points ∼91% -2%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
10259 Points ∼91% -2%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (10162 - 10553, n=4)
10366 Points ∼92% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1174 - 11598, n=375)
4601 Points ∼41% -56%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4529 Points ∼95%
Huawei Mate 20 X
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
3234 Points ∼68% -29%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3476 Points ∼73% -23%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
3472 Points ∼73% -23%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
4774 Points ∼100% +5%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3406 Points ∼71% -25%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4505 Points ∼94% -1%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (4499 - 4529, n=4)
4510 Points ∼94% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (691 - 4824, n=377)
1374 Points ∼29% -70%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
7704 Points ∼77%
Huawei Mate 20 X
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
7772 Points ∼78% +1%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9664 Points ∼97% +25%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
9974 Points ∼100% +29%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9125 Points ∼91% +18%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
7812 Points ∼78% +1%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (7595 - 7966, n=4)
7769 Points ∼78% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3227 - 11440, n=373)
5046 Points ∼51% -35%
Work performance score (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
9557 Points ∼80%
Huawei Mate 20 X
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
9867 Points ∼83% +3%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
11857 Points ∼100% +24%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
11766 Points ∼99% +23%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
11890 Points ∼100% +24%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
9793 Points ∼82% +2%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (9557 - 10008, n=4)
9777 Points ∼82% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4096 - 14439, n=541)
5537 Points ∼47% -42%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
2720 Points ∼82%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3134 Points ∼94% +15%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
3317 Points ∼100% +22%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
2794 Points ∼84% +3%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
2488 Points ∼75% -9%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (2488 - 2720, n=2)
2604 Points ∼79% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2051 - 15735, n=56)
2369 Points ∼71% -13%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
5565 Points ∼96%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5779 Points ∼100% +4%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
5794 Points ∼100% +4%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4236 Points ∼73% -24%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
5530 Points ∼95% -1%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (5530 - 5565, n=2)
5548 Points ∼96% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (341 - 14536, n=56)
2333 Points ∼40% -58%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4515 Points ∼91%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4866 Points ∼98% +8%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
4969 Points ∼100% +10%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3800 Points ∼76% -16%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4348 Points ∼88% -4%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (4348 - 4515, n=2)
4432 Points ∼89% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (419 - 14786, n=59)
2039 Points ∼41% -55%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
3480 Points ∼79%
Huawei Mate 20 X
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
2517 Points ∼57% -28%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4235 Points ∼96% +22%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
4429 Points ∼100% +27%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
2723 Points ∼61% -22%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3309 Points ∼75% -5%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
2925 Points ∼66% -16%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (2925 - 3480, n=4)
3123 Points ∼71% -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 4535, n=387)
1834 Points ∼41% -47%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
5418 Points ∼76%
Huawei Mate 20 X
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
4103 Points ∼58% -24%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7083 Points ∼100% +31%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
7115 Points ∼100% +31%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
4828 Points ∼68% -11%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5184 Points ∼73% -4%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
5371 Points ∼75% -1%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (5358 - 5418, n=4)
5379 Points ∼76% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (76 - 8206, n=387)
1602 Points ∼23% -70%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4821 Points ∼77%
Huawei Mate 20 X
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
3599 Points ∼57% -25%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
6162 Points ∼98% +28%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
6270 Points ∼100% +30%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
4121 Points ∼66% -15%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4604 Points ∼73% -5%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4529 Points ∼72% -6%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (4529 - 4821, n=4)
4630 Points ∼74% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (94 - 6312, n=390)
1489 Points ∼24% -69%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
3513 Points ∼81%
Huawei Mate 20 X
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
2488 Points ∼57% -29%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4120 Points ∼95% +17%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
4352 Points ∼100% +24%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
2961 Points ∼68% -16%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3293 Points ∼76% -6%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
3087 Points ∼71% -12%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (3077 - 3513, n=3)
3226 Points ∼74% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 4703, n=402)
1811 Points ∼42% -48%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
5307 Points ∼51%
Huawei Mate 20 X
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
2536 Points ∼24% -52%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
10279 Points ∼99% +94%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
10420 Points ∼100% +96%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
10374 Points ∼100% +95%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
6358 Points ∼61% +20%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4449 Points ∼43% -16%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (4449 - 5307, n=3)
4881 Points ∼47% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (131 - 14951, n=402)
2185 Points ∼21% -59%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4766 Points ∼60%
Huawei Mate 20 X
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
2525 Points ∼32% -47%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7716 Points ∼97% +62%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
7955 Points ∼100% +67%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
6667 Points ∼84% +40%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5268 Points ∼66% +11%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4052 Points ∼51% -15%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (4052 - 4766, n=3)
4380 Points ∼55% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (159 - 8141, n=403)
1860 Points ∼23% -61%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
3296 Points ∼81%
Huawei Mate 20 X
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
3751 Points ∼92% +14%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4093 Points ∼100% +24%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
4063 Points ∼99% +23%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
3027 Points ∼74% -8%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3242 Points ∼79% -2%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
2977 Points ∼73% -10%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (2854 - 3296, n=4)
3033 Points ∼74% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (486 - 4320, n=463)
1772 Points ∼43% -46%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
5152 Points ∼81%
Huawei Mate 20 X
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
3528 Points ∼56% -32%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
6356 Points ∼100% +23%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
6248 Points ∼98% +21%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
3726 Points ∼59% -28%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
6040 Points ∼95% +17%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
5186 Points ∼82% +1%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (5152 - 5206, n=4)
5180 Points ∼81% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (65 - 6362, n=465)
1334 Points ∼21% -74%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4579 Points ∼81%
Huawei Mate 20 X
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
3575 Points ∼63% -22%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5661 Points ∼100% +24%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
5581 Points ∼99% +22%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
3544 Points ∼63% -23%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5068 Points ∼90% +11%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4452 Points ∼79% -3%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (4383 - 4579, n=4)
4473 Points ∼79% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (80 - 5734, n=473)
1273 Points ∼22% -72%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
3448 Points ∼84%
Huawei Mate 20 X
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
3816 Points ∼93% +11%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3919 Points ∼96% +14%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
4091 Points ∼100% +19%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
2713 Points ∼66% -21%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3505 Points ∼86% +2%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
2875 Points ∼70% -17%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (2875 - 3448, n=3)
3076 Points ∼75% -11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (512 - 4454, n=496)
1680 Points ∼41% -51%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
6058 Points ∼61%
Huawei Mate 20 X
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
2347 Points ∼24% -61%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9932 Points ∼100% +64%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
9845 Points ∼99% +63%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
7055 Points ∼71% +16%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
6122 Points ∼62% +1%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
5303 Points ∼53% -12%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (4507 - 6058, n=3)
5289 Points ∼53% -13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 10008, n=496)
1803 Points ∼18% -70%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
5186 Points ∼69%
Huawei Mate 20 X
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
2567 Points ∼34% -51%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7407 Points ∼99% +43%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
7501 Points ∼100% +45%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
5205 Points ∼69% 0%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5251 Points ∼70% +1%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4465 Points ∼60% -14%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (4015 - 5186, n=3)
4555 Points ∼61% -12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 7820, n=504)
1549 Points ∼21% -70%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
32308 Points ∼100%
Huawei Mate 20 X
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
19993 Points ∼62% -38%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
23877 Points ∼74% -26%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
26936 Points ∼83% -17%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
27717 Points ∼86% -14%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
30972 Points ∼96% -4%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
32302 Points ∼100% 0%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (31297 - 32308, n=4)
32016 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4811 - 45072, n=654)
13712 Points ∼42% -58%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
66990 Points ∼42%
Huawei Mate 20 X
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
42579 Points ∼27% -36%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
106799 Points ∼67% +59%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
106829 Points ∼67% +59%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
159735 Points ∼100% +138%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
97354 Points ∼61% +45%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
70318 Points ∼44% +5%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (66990 - 72022, n=4)
70156 Points ∼44% +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7567 - 162695, n=654)
20179 Points ∼13% -70%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
54087 Points ∼70%
Huawei Mate 20 X
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
34035 Points ∼44% -37%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
60279 Points ∼78% +11%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
64389 Points ∼83% +19%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
77599 Points ∼100% +43%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
65945 Points ∼85% +22%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
55740 Points ∼72% +3%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (54087 - 56465, n=4)
55454 Points ∼71% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (8316 - 83518, n=655)
16716 Points ∼22% -69%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
97 fps ∼43%
Huawei Mate 20 X
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
119 fps ∼53% +23%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
166 fps ∼73% +71%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
166 fps ∼73% +71%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
226 fps ∼100% +133%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
85 fps ∼38% -12%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
96 fps ∼42% -1%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (96 - 143, n=4)
119 fps ∼53% +23%
Average of class Smartphone
  (6 - 251, n=684)
35.2 fps ∼16% -64%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
59 fps ∼98%
Huawei Mate 20 X
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
58 fps ∼97% -2%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
59 fps ∼98% 0%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
60 fps ∼100% +2%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
60 fps ∼100% +2%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
60 fps ∼100% +2%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
58 fps ∼97% -2%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (58 - 60, n=4)
59.3 fps ∼99% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.8 - 120, n=687)
27.1 fps ∼45% -54%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
85 fps ∼79%
Huawei Mate 20 X
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
78 fps ∼73% -8%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
100 fps ∼93% +18%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
101 fps ∼94% +19%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
107 fps ∼100% +26%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
50 fps ∼47% -41%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
67 fps ∼63% -21%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (67 - 85, n=4)
80.5 fps ∼75% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.7 - 132, n=603)
19.4 fps ∼18% -77%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
53 fps ∼90%
Huawei Mate 20 X
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
58 fps ∼98% +9%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
59 fps ∼100% +11%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
55 fps ∼93% +4%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
59 fps ∼100% +11%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
51 fps ∼86% -4%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
53 fps ∼90% 0%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (53 - 59, n=4)
54.5 fps ∼92% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.4 - 115, n=608)
18 fps ∼31% -66%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
67 fps ∼94%
Huawei Mate 20 X
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
53 fps ∼75% -21%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
70 fps ∼99% +4%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
71 fps ∼100% +6%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
69.3 fps ∼98% +3%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
35 fps ∼49% -48%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
67 fps ∼94% 0%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (53 - 67, n=4)
60 fps ∼85% -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.6 - 88, n=464)
15.9 fps ∼22% -76%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
37 fps ∼63%
Huawei Mate 20 X
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
50 fps ∼85% +35%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
57 fps ∼97% +54%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
36 fps ∼61% -3%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
58.9 fps ∼100% +59%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
36 fps ∼61% -3%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
37 fps ∼63% 0%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (30 - 53, n=4)
39.3 fps ∼67% +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.4 - 110, n=467)
15.3 fps ∼26% -59%
GFXBench
High Tier Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
16 fps ∼50%
Huawei Mate 20 X
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
20 fps ∼62% +25%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
25 fps ∼78% +56%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
15 fps ∼47% -6%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
32.1 fps ∼100% +101%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
14 fps ∼44% -12%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
16 fps ∼50% 0%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (16 - 28, n=4)
19 fps ∼59% +19%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.86 - 59, n=167)
8.89 fps ∼28% -44%
2560x1440 High Tier Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
17 fps ∼100%
Huawei Mate 20 X
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
13 fps ∼76% -24%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
17 fps ∼100% 0%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
16 fps ∼94% -6%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
16.3 fps ∼96% -4%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
8.5 fps ∼50% -50%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
17 fps ∼100% 0%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (16 - 17, n=4)
16.8 fps ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.26 - 31, n=167)
6.16 fps ∼36% -64%
Normal Tier Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
26 fps ∼55%
Huawei Mate 20 X
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
29 fps ∼62% +12%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
38 fps ∼81% +46%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
23 fps ∼49% -12%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
47 fps ∼100% +81%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
22 fps ∼47% -15%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
26 fps ∼55% 0%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (16 - 26, n=4)
23.3 fps ∼50% -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.8 - 59, n=168)
13.5 fps ∼29% -48%
1920x1080 Normal Tier Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
46 fps ∼100%
Huawei Mate 20 X
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
30 fps ∼65% -35%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
42 fps ∼91% -9%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
42 fps ∼91% -9%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
36.8 fps ∼80% -20%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
22 fps ∼48% -52%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
46 fps ∼100% 0%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (41 - 46, n=4)
44.3 fps ∼96% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.94 - 63, n=168)
14.7 fps ∼32% -68%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
43 fps ∼100%
Huawei Mate 20 X
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
28 fps ∼65% -35%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
42 fps ∼98% -2%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
42 fps ∼98% -2%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
40 fps ∼93% -7%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
22 fps ∼51% -49%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
43 fps ∼100% 0%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (35 - 43, n=4)
41 fps ∼95% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.89 - 54, n=393)
10.7 fps ∼25% -75%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
23 fps ∼62%
Huawei Mate 20 X
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
28 fps ∼76% +22%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
37 fps ∼100% +61%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
21 fps ∼57% -9%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
31 fps ∼84% +35%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
21 fps ∼57% -9%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
23 fps ∼62% 0%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (23 - 40, n=4)
27.3 fps ∼74% +19%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.6 - 58, n=397)
9.69 fps ∼26% -58%
Basemark GPU
1920x1080 OpenGL Medium Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
37.3 fps ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
32.26 (min: 8.31, max: 85.07) fps ∼86%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (32.3 - 33, n=3)
32.6 fps ∼87%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.53 - 37.4, n=61)
15.1 fps ∼40%
Vulkan Medium Native (sorteer op waarde)
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
22.73 fps ∼75%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
27.18 (min: 8.36, max: 46.5) fps ∼90%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (27.2 - 36.2, n=3)
30.2 fps ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.91 - 36.2, n=56)
12.1 fps ∼40%
1920x1080 Vulkan Medium Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
36.29 fps ∼94%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
38.5 (min: 9.69, max: 72.94) fps ∼100%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (38.4 - 38.6, n=3)
38.5 fps ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.2 - 38.6, n=56)
14.3 fps ∼37%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
327454 Points ∼88%
Huawei Mate 20 X
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
273409 Points ∼74% -17%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
371848 Points ∼100% +14%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
369294 Points ∼99% +13%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
302955 Points ∼81% -7%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
321145 Points ∼86% -2%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
333277 Points ∼90% +2%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (327454 - 333277, n=4)
329572 Points ∼89% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (52607 - 398720, n=286)
131662 Points ∼35% -60%
VRMark - Amber Room (sorteer op waarde)
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
4969 Score ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4967 Score ∼100%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
 
4967 Score ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone
  (552 - 5025, n=58)
1911 Score ∼38%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
1012 Points ∼58%
Huawei Mate 20 X
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
1239 Points ∼72% +22%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
1431 Points ∼83% +41%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
1364 Points ∼79% +35%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
1731 Points ∼100% +71%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
1171 Points ∼68% +16%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
1383 Points ∼80% +37%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (1012 - 1439, n=4)
1305 Points ∼75% +29%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7 - 1731, n=616)
747 Points ∼43% -26%
Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
8981 Points ∼57%
Huawei Mate 20 X
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
5070 Points ∼32% -44%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9361 Points ∼60% +4%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
9421 Points ∼60% +5%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
15659 Points ∼100% +74%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
8414 Points ∼54% -6%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
8401 Points ∼54% -6%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (7361 - 8981, n=4)
8307 Points ∼53% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (18 - 15969, n=616)
1965 Points ∼13% -78%
Memory (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4502 Points ∼72%
Huawei Mate 20 X
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
5700 Points ∼91% +27%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
6253 Points ∼100% +39%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
5243 Points ∼84% +16%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
1815 Points ∼29% -60%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4324 Points ∼69% -4%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4306 Points ∼69% -4%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (4306 - 4570, n=4)
4463 Points ∼71% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (21 - 7500, n=616)
1473 Points ∼24% -67%
System (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
7793 Points ∼67%
Huawei Mate 20 X
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
7923 Points ∼68% +2%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
8652 Points ∼74% +11%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
9143 Points ∼78% +17%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
11675 Points ∼100% +50%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
8718 Points ∼75% +12%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
8344 Points ∼71% +7%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (7476 - 8344, n=4)
7861 Points ∼67% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (369 - 12202, n=616)
2887 Points ∼25% -63%
Overall (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4226 Points ∼81%
Huawei Mate 20 X
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
4104 Points ∼79% -3%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5188 Points ∼100% +23%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
4982 Points ∼96% +18%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
4895 Points ∼94% +16%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4389 Points ∼85% +4%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4520 Points ∼87% +7%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (4226 - 4548, n=4)
4404 Points ∼85% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (150 - 6097, n=620)
1437 Points ∼28% -66%
Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sorteer op waarde)
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
1421 Points ∼59%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
1425 Points ∼59%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
2407 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
1928 Points ∼80%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (1927 - 1937, n=3)
1931 Points ∼80%
Average of class Smartphone
  (35 - 2754, n=103)
703 Points ∼29%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
OnePlus 7 Pro (Chrome 74)
62.5 Points ∼100% +41%
LG G8s ThinQ (Chrome 75)
53.783 Points ∼86% +21%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro (Chrome 74)
52.718 Points ∼84% +19%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G (Samung Browser 9.2)
44.352 Points ∼71%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (44.1 - 44.4, n=2)
44.2 Points ∼71% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus (Samung Browser 9.0)
44.128 Points ∼71% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (12.9 - 108, n=93)
30.6 Points ∼49% -31%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
ZTE Axon 10 Pro (Chrome 74)
66.3 runs/min ∼100% +16%
LG G8s ThinQ (Chome 75)
64.1 runs/min ∼97% +12%
OnePlus 7 Pro (Chome 74)
61.5 runs/min ∼93% +8%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G (Samsung Browser 9.2)
57 runs/min ∼86%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus (Samsung Browser 9.0)
56 runs/min ∼84% -2%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (54 - 57, n=3)
55.7 runs/min ∼84% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (6.42 - 123, n=82)
34.6 runs/min ∼52% -39%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Apple iPhone Xs Max (Safari 12)
155 Points ∼100% +35%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus (Samsung Browser 9.0)
115 Points ∼74% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
115 Points ∼74%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (115 - 115, n=2)
115 Points ∼74% 0%
OnePlus 7 Pro (Chrome 74)
111 Points ∼72% -3%
LG G8s ThinQ (Chrome 75)
107 Points ∼69% -7%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro (Chrome 74)
98 Points ∼63% -15%
Huawei Mate 20 X (hrome 71)
86 Points ∼55% -25%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 161, n=147)
63 Points ∼41% -45%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone Xs Max (Safari 12)
43114 Points ∼100% +109%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro (Chrome 74)
25640 Points ∼59% +24%
OnePlus 7 Pro (Chrome 74)
24730 Points ∼57% +20%
LG G8s ThinQ (Chrome 75)
23830 Points ∼55% +15%
Huawei Mate 20 X (hrome 71)
21208 Points ∼49% +3%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus (Samsung Browser 9.0)
20849 Points ∼48% +1%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G (Samsung Browser 9.2)
20653 Points ∼48%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (18697 - 20849, n=4)
20121 Points ∼47% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (1994 - 43280, n=677)
6359 Points ∼15% -69%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (603 - 59466, n=697)
10720 ms * ∼100% -488%
Huawei Mate 20 X (hrome 71)
2145.4 ms * ∼20% -18%
LG G8s ThinQ (Chrome 75)
2036 ms * ∼19% -12%
OnePlus 7 Pro (Chrome 74)
1965 ms * ∼18% -8%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (1823 - 2240, n=4)
1961 ms * ∼18% -8%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus (Samsung Browser 9.0)
1856.6 ms * ∼17% -2%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro (Chrome 74)
1851.7 ms * ∼17% -2%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G (Samsung Browser 9.2)
1823.2 ms * ∼17%
Apple iPhone Xs Max (Safari 12)
603.1 ms * ∼6% +67%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Apple iPhone Xs Max (Safari 12)
273.01 Points ∼100% +200%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro (Chrome 74)
118.27 Points ∼43% +30%
LG G8s ThinQ (Chrome 75)
94.144 Points ∼34% +4%
Huawei Mate 20 X (hrome 71)
93.241 Points ∼34% +3%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus (Samsung Browser 9.0)
91.774 Points ∼34% +1%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G (Samsung Browser 9.2)
90.876 Points ∼33%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (84 - 91.8, n=3)
88.9 Points ∼33% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (12 - 273, n=516)
39.1 Points ∼14% -57%

* ... kleiner is beter

Samsung Galaxy S10 5GHuawei Mate 20 XZTE Axon 10 ProOnePlus 7 ProLG G8s ThinQSamsung Galaxy S10 PlusAverage 256 GB UFS 2.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
223%
202%
43%
-1%
-1%
81%
-52%
Random Write 4KB
23.79
237.63
899%
189.53
697%
24.8
4%
29.6
24%
22.7
-5%
98.1 (22.1 - 160, n=7)
312%
20.6 (0.14 - 250, n=725)
-13%
Random Read 4KB
134.96
144.44
7%
150.36
11%
174.1
29%
138
2%
135.16
0%
153 (127 - 174, n=7)
13%
45.4 (1.59 - 175, n=725)
-66%
Sequential Write 256KB
246.3
182.7
-26%
503.04
104%
387
57%
182.4
-26%
249.06
1%
245 (228 - 253, n=7)
-1%
93 (2.99 - 503, n=725)
-62%
Sequential Read 256KB
815.56
911.88
12%
768.93
-6%
1468
80%
791.1
-3%
811.17
-1%
807 (687 - 873, n=7)
-1%
262 (12.1 - 1468, n=725)
-68%
PUBG Mobile & Arena of Valor
0102030405060Tooltip
; PUBG Mobile; 0.13.0: Ø37.3 (28-41)
; Arena of Valor; 1.30.2.4: Ø57.2 (48-60)
Max. Belasting
 34.2 °C33.2 °C31.2 °C 
 34.2 °C35.2 °C29.7 °C 
 33.8 °C33.2 °C29 °C 
Maximum: 35.2 °C
Gemiddelde: 32.6 °C
25.3 °C31 °C30.5 °C
27.7 °C30.3 °C31.8 °C
27.3 °C30 °C31.4 °C
Maximum: 31.8 °C
Gemiddelde: 29.5 °C
Stroomadapter (max.)  25.6 °C | Kamertemperatuur 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 32.6 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 33.1 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35.2 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 35.5 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 31.8 °C / 89 F, compared to the average of 34.1 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23 °C / 73 F, compared to the device average of 33.1 °C / 92 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2036.735.32537.130.93128.122.64027.627.75037.533.96322.923.28023.823.810021.323.912519.133.916018.449.120017.949.225017.756.831517.965.640014.662.650015.96463015.26780016.266.810001471.512501575160014.774.8200014.475.6250014.676.6315014.277.1400014.778.6500014.675.3630014.974.7800015.1711000015.163.31250014.8591600015.159.5SPL27.286.7N0.966.9median 15.1median 66.8Delta1.410.731.137.329.230.42622.323.221.531.931.327.421.72921.624.224.818.4341851.817.450.714.456.115.859.716.360.815.461.114.763.516.265.514.77313.871.61474.314.473.914.176.414.674.114.672.714.470.514.469.214.863.715.259.214.758.614.849.726.984.10.955.6median 14.7median 63.51.49.6hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSamsung Galaxy S10 5GHuawei Mate 20 X
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 38% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 55% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Huawei Mate 20 X audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.7% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 39% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 54% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Stroomgebruik
Uit / Standbydarklight 0.01 / 0.08 Watt
Inactiefdarkmidlight 0.66 / 1.82 / 1.83 Watt
Belasting midlight 6.11 / 9.81 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
4500 mAh
Huawei Mate 20 X
5000 mAh
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
4000 mAh
OnePlus 7 Pro
4000 mAh
Apple iPhone Xs Max
3174 mAh
LG G8s ThinQ
3550 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
4100 mAh
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-1%
23%
-13%
7%
-13%
-0%
8%
7%
Idle Minimum *
0.66
0.79
-20%
0.76
-15%
0.9
-36%
1
-52%
1.2
-82%
0.73
-11%
0.65 (0.6 - 0.73, n=4)
2%
0.878 (0.2 - 3.4, n=752)
-33%
Idle Average *
1.82
1.72
5%
1.15
37%
1.8
1%
1.4
23%
1.6
12%
1.53
16%
1.455 (1.2 - 1.82, n=4)
20%
1.732 (0.6 - 6.2, n=751)
5%
Idle Maximum *
1.83
1.83
-0%
1.18
36%
2.9
-58%
1.7
7%
2
-9%
2.07
-13%
1.675 (1.3 - 2.07, n=4)
8%
2.02 (0.74 - 6.6, n=752)
-10%
Load Average *
6.11
5.53
9%
3.95
35%
5.5
10%
4.6
25%
5
18%
6.03
1%
5.88 (5.2 - 6.17, n=4)
4%
4.06 (0.8 - 10.8, n=746)
34%
Load Maximum *
9.81
9.85
-0%
7.49
24%
8.2
16%
6.7
32%
10
-2%
9.18
6%
9.44 (8.55 - 10.2, n=4)
4%
5.88 (1.2 - 14.2, n=746)
40%

* ... kleiner is beter

Batterijduur
Inactief (zonder WLAN, minimale helderheid)
39h 00min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3 (Samsung Browser 9.2)
8h 53min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
17h 27min
Belast (maximale helderheid)
5h 27min
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
4500 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
4100 mAh
Huawei Mate 20 X
5000 mAh
Apple iPhone Xs Max
3174 mAh
LG G8s ThinQ
3550 mAh
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
4000 mAh
OnePlus 7 Pro
4000 mAh
Batterijduur
-24%
5%
-15%
-16%
-6%
-8%
Reader / Idle
2340
1560
-33%
1984
-15%
1305
-44%
1689
-28%
1927
-18%
1745
-25%
H.264
1047
921
-12%
986
-6%
801
-23%
753
-28%
1068
2%
802
-23%
WiFi v1.3
533
483
-9%
786
47%
742
39%
693
30%
680
28%
768
44%
Load
327
187
-43%
300
-8%
223
-32%
203
-38%
217
-34%
236
-28%

Pro

+ uitstekend design
+ hoogwaardige materialen
+ indrukwekkende camera's
+ erg helder AMOLED-scherm
+ IP68-certificatie
+ 3D-gezichtsherkenning
+ ultrasone vingerafdruklezer
+ omkeerbaar draadloos opladen
+ ultrasnel bedraad opladen
+ koptelefoon-klink
+ krachtige SoC

Contra

- frame-rates haperen in veeleisende games
- SoC-throttling onder aanhoudende belasting
- PWM
- geen aptX-HD
- geen micro-SD-sleuf
- luidsprekers klinken schel
- teleurstellende batterijduur
- slechts één SIM
- bloatware
Getest: de Samsung Galaxy S10 5G (SM-G977B) smartphone.
Getest: de Samsung Galaxy S10 5G (SM-G977B) smartphone.

Dit is de verkorte versie van het originele artikel. Het volledige, Engelse testrapport vind je hier.

De Galaxy S10 5G onderscheidt zich van zijn concurrenten met meer dan alleen zijn 5G-modem. Dit laatste werpt echter een schaduw op heel wat aspecten die we anders positief zouden vinden in een smartphone. Neem nu bijvoorbeeld de batterij van 4500 mAh, die groter is dan eender welke smartphone-batterij met uitzondering van die in Mate 20 X. 4500 mAh is op papier erg indrukwekkend, maar de 5G-modem bijt er zo doorheen, waardoor ons testtoestel het minder dan 10 uur volhield in onze WiFi-test. Daarnaast verkoopt Samsung de S10 5G alleen met een vast abonnement bij een provider, waar we geen fan van zijn.

Samsung weigert nog altijd om ondersteuning toe te voegen voor aptX HD en hoewel de Exynos 9820 een krachtige SoC is, zorgt de ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU voor haperingen bij het spelen van veeleisende games. We begrijpen dat dit eerder een detail is, maar we verwachten toch meer van een smartphone van meer dan 1300 euro. Het weglaten van een microSD-sleuf valt eveneens moeilijk te slikken, zeker gezien het feit dat Samsung er reeds een installeerde in alle andere smartphones van de S10-serie. De speakers zullen evenmin prijzen winnen.

De Samsung Galaxy S10 5G is een sterk startschot voor de nieuwe 5G-standaard, maar een aantal minpunten temperen ons enthousiasme.

De S10 5G heeft in principe bijna alle features die je maar zou kunnen wensen van een modern vlaggenschip. Zijn reusachtige AMOLED-scherm wordt extreem helder en geeft kleuren levendig en accuraat weer. Samsung heeft ook uitstekende camera's en ToF-sensoren geïnstalleerd, waar we erg blij mee zijn. De ultrasone vingerafdruklezer werkt prima, net als die in de S10 en S10+, en het is leuk om de optie te hebben om 3D-gezichtsherkenning te gebruiken. De 3.5-mm koptelefoon-klink is eveneens welkom. 

De Galaxy S10 5G is een uitstekende keuze als je op zoek bent naar een phablet, zelfs zonder zijn 5G-capaciteiten. Hij ziet er momenteel echter extreem duur uit in vergelijking met zijn S10-broertjes, terwijl zijn weinige, maar significante tekortkomingen potentiële kopers kunnen afschrikken.

Samsung Galaxy S10 5G - 21-08-2019 v6
Daniel Schmidt

Behuizing
92%
Toetsenbord
67 / 75 → 90%
Aanwijsapparaat
98%
Aansluitmogelijkheden
66 / 60 → 100%
Gewicht
88%
Batterij
95%
Beeldscherm
89%
Gaming-performance
68 / 63 → 100%
Applicatie-performance
79 / 70 → 100%
Temperatuur
95%
Luidheid
100%
Audio
68 / 91 → 75%
Camera
91%
Gemiddelde
84%
91%
Smartphone - Gewogen Gemiddelde

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Overzichten en testrapporten over laptops en mobieltjes > Testrapporten > Kort testrapport Samsung Galaxy S10 5G Smartphone: een opgedreven S10 met een high-tech toevoeging
Daniel Schmidt, 2019-07-31 (Update: 2019-07-31)