Notebookcheck

Kort testrapport BQ Aquaris X2 Pro Smartphone

Daniel Schmidt (vertaald door Siemon Boes), 29-07-2018

Meer power! BQ heeft een nieuwe editie van zijn vlaggenschip-smartphone geproduceerd - inclusief de Pro-versie. Aantrekkelijke vormen en kleuren worden gecombineerd met een SoC van de bovenste plank, voldoende opslag, nieuwe camera's en... een hoge prijs. Is het Pro-model de meerprijs waard? Kom het te weten in ons testrapport.

BQ Aquaris X2 Pro (Aquaris Serie)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660
Grafische kaart
Qualcomm Adreno 512, Core: 650 MHz
Geheugen
4096 MB 
Beeldscherm
5.65 inch 2:1, 2160 x 1080 pixel 427 PPI, 10-punt capacitief touchscreen, LTPS, glimmend: ja
Opslag
64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 GB 
, 51.8 GB beschikbaar
Verbindingen
1 USB 3.0, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Audio Verbindingen: 3.5-mm audio-klink, Card Reader: microSD tot 256 GB (SD, SDHC, SDXC), 1 Vingerafdruklezer, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensoren: afstandssensor, accelerometer, Hall-sensor, eCompass, gyroscoop, FM radio, OTG, USB-PD, Galileo
Netwerkmogelijkheden
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 5.0, GSM/GPRS/Edge (850, 900, 1800 en 1900 MHz), UMTS/HSPA+ (850, 900, 1900 and 2100 MHz), LTE Cat. 6 (Band 1, 3, 7 en 20), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Afmetingen
hoogte x breedte x diepte (in mm): 8.35 x 150.7 x 72.3
Batterij
3100 mAh Lithium-Ion, QuickCharge 4+
Besturingssysteem
Android 8.1 Oreo
Camera
Primary Camera: 12 MPix (Samsung S5K2L8, diafragma f/1.8, 1.29 μm/pixel, 6 Largan-lenzen, Dual-Tone-flash, autofocus met faseherkenning Dual-PD) + 5 MP (Samsung S5K5E8, 1.12 μm), Ultra-HD video incl. stabilisatie
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix (Samsung S5K4H7, diafragma f/2.0, 1.12 μm/pixel, 4 lenzen, front-flash, Full-HD-video)
Bijkomende functionaliteiten
Luidsprekers: dual-luidsprekers, Toetsenbord: onscreen, oplader, USB-kabel, QuickStart-handleiding, veiligheidsinformatie, Android One, BQ Plus, 24 Maanden Garantie, hoofd-SAR: 1.495 W/Kg, lichaam-SAR: 1.451 W/Kg, IP52-gecertificeerd, fanless
Gewicht
168 g, Voeding: 35 g
Prijs
400 Euro

 

Ongelijkmatige openingen tussen onderdelen van de behuizing.
Ongelijkmatige openingen tussen onderdelen van de behuizing.

Formaat Vergelijking

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
Adreno 512, 660, 64 GB eMMC Flash
281 MBit/s ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
Mali-G71 MP2, 7885, 32 GB eMMC Flash
280 MBit/s ∼100% 0%
Nokia 7 Plus
Adreno 512, 660, 64 GB eMMC Flash
247 MBit/s ∼88% -12%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
Adreno 506, 626, 64 GB eMMC Flash
242 MBit/s ∼86% -14%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
Adreno 509, 636, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
232 MBit/s ∼83% -17%
Honor 10
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
210 MBit/s ∼75% -25%
Average of class Smartphone
  (30.5 - 939, n=243)
189 MBit/s ∼67% -33%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
Adreno 512, 660, 64 GB eMMC Flash
346 MBit/s ∼100%
Nokia 7 Plus
Adreno 512, 660, 64 GB eMMC Flash
307 MBit/s ∼89% -11%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
Mali-G71 MP2, 7885, 32 GB eMMC Flash
269 MBit/s ∼78% -22%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
Adreno 509, 636, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
237 MBit/s ∼68% -32%
Honor 10
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
236 MBit/s ∼68% -32%
Average of class Smartphone
  (44.3 - 703, n=243)
185 MBit/s ∼53% -47%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
Adreno 506, 626, 64 GB eMMC Flash
148 MBit/s ∼43% -57%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro - overzicht
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro - overzicht
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro - splitsing
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro - splitsing
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro - rondje rond het meer
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro - rondje rond het meer
Garmin Edge 500 - overzicht
Garmin Edge 500 - overzicht
Garmin Edge 500 - splitsing
Garmin Edge 500 - splitsing
Garmin Edge 500 - rondje rond het meer
Garmin Edge 500 - rondje rond het meer

Beeldvergelijking

Bekijk een scène en navigeer binnen het eerste beeld. Eén klik wijzigt het zoomniveau. Eén klik op het ingezoomde beeld opent het origineel in een nieuw venster. Het eerste beeld toont de verschaalde foto van het testtoestel.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
klik om beelden te laden
621
cd/m²
636
cd/m²
626
cd/m²
627
cd/m²
675
cd/m²
673
cd/m²
663
cd/m²
659
cd/m²
673
cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 675 cd/m² Gemiddelde: 650.3 cd/m² Minimum: 13.5 cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling: 92 %
Helderheid in Batterij-modus: 675 cd/m²
Contrast: 1467:1 (Zwart: 0.46 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.9 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.3
ΔE Greyscale 6.6 | 0.64-98 Ø6.5
99.4% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.36
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
LTPS, 2160x1080, 5.65
BQ Aquaris X Pro
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2
Honor 10
IPS, 2280x1080, 5.84
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
AMOLED, 2160x1080, 6
Nokia 7 Plus
IPS, 2160x1080, 6
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
Super AMOLED, 2220x1080, 5.6
Screen
-31%
15%
-10%
15%
6%
Brightness middle
675
458
-32%
555
-18%
446
-34%
458
-32%
541
-20%
Brightness
650
473
-27%
537
-17%
451
-31%
463
-29%
538
-17%
Brightness Distribution
92
88
-4%
94
2%
93
1%
92
0%
96
4%
Black Level *
0.46
0.51
-11%
0.39
15%
0.22
52%
Contrast
1467
898
-39%
1423
-3%
2082
42%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
5.9
7.1
-20%
2.3
61%
6.58
-12%
4
32%
5.8
2%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
9.5
14.5
-53%
6
37%
11.94
-26%
7.4
22%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
6.6
10.5
-59%
3.9
41%
3.6
45%
4.7
29%
2.7
59%
Gamma
2.36 102%
2.28 105%
2.19 110%
2.199 109%
2.19 110%
2.07 116%
CCT
7846 83%
8951 73%
6212 105%
7116 91%
7425 88%
6570 99%

* ... kleiner is beter

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Om de schermhelderheid te verlagen schakelen sommige laptops het backlight erg snel aan en uit. Dit gebeurt aan een dergelijk hoge frequentie dat het niet zichtbaar is voor het menselijk oog. Als de frequentie te laag is kunnen personen met gevoelige ogen geïrriteerd geraken, hoofdpijn krijgen en zelfs flickering waarnemen.
Screen flickering / PWM waargenomen 2315 Hz ≤ 46 % helderheid instelling

Het backlight van het scherm flikkert aan 2315 Hz (hoogstwaarschijnlijk met PWM - Pulse-Width Modulation) aan een helderheid van 46 % en lager. Boven deze helderheid zou er geen flickering / PWM mogen optreden.

De frequentie van 2315 Hz is redelijk hoog en de meeste mensen die gevoelig zijn aan flickering zouden dit dus niet mogen waarnemen of geïrriteerde ogen krijgen.

Ter vergelijking: 54 % van alle geteste toestellen maakten geen gebruik van PWM om de schermhelderheid te verlagen. Als het wel werd gebruikt, werd een gemiddelde van 8895 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz waargenomen.

Responstijd Scherm

De responstijden van het scherm tonen hoe snel het scherm in staat is om van één kleur naar de andere te veranderen. Trage responstijden kunnen aanleiding geven tot 'nabeelden' rond bewegende objecten of het scherm wazig maken (blur). Vooral spelers van snelle 3D-games hebben baat bij een scherm met snelle responstijden.
       Responstijd Zwart naar Wit
28 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd↗ 12 ms stijging
↘ 16 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde relatief trage responstijden in onze tests en is misschien te traag voor games.
Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.8 (minimum) tot 240 (maximum) ms. » 59 % van alle toestellen zijn beter.
Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd vergelijkbaar is met het gemiddelde (25.9 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.
       Responstijd 50% Grijs naar 80% Grijs
46.8 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd↗ 23.2 ms stijging
↘ 23.6 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde trage responstijden in onze tests en is misschien te traag voor games.
Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.9 (minimum) tot 636 (maximum) ms. » 75 % van alle toestellen zijn beter.
Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd slechter is dan het gemiddelde (41.4 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sorteer op waarde)
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
115834 Points ∼66%
Honor 10
174272 Points ∼100% +50%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
66226 Points ∼38% -43%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
93813 Points ∼54% -19%
Nokia 7 Plus
117165 Points ∼67% +1%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
83284 Points ∼48% -28%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
110680 Points ∼64% -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (110680 - 118525, n=5)
115834 Points ∼66% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (23275 - 230642, n=336)
70824 Points ∼41% -39%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sorteer op waarde)
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
140875 Points ∼69%
Honor 10
205297 Points ∼100% +46%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
82343 Points ∼40% -42%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
115656 Points ∼56% -18%
Nokia 7 Plus
141701 Points ∼69% +1%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
116746 Points ∼57% -17%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
140714 Points ∼69% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (126462 - 141701, n=4)
137438 Points ∼67% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (0 - 290397, n=113)
103239 Points ∼50% -27%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sorteer op waarde)
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
5965 Points ∼85%
Honor 10
7046 Points ∼100% +18%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
4915 Points ∼70% -18%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
5640 Points ∼80% -5%
Nokia 7 Plus
6077 Points ∼86% +2%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
5214 Points ∼74% -13%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
5995 Points ∼85% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (5965 - 6124, n=4)
6040 Points ∼86% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (3138 - 8601, n=201)
4453 Points ∼63% -25%
Work performance score (sorteer op waarde)
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
6332 Points ∼74%
Honor 10
8530 Points ∼100% +35%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
5886 Points ∼69% -7%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
6457 Points ∼76% +2%
Nokia 7 Plus
6825 Points ∼80% +8%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
5916 Points ∼69% -7%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
6723 Points ∼79% +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (6332 - 7026, n=4)
6727 Points ∼79% +6%
Average of class Smartphone (2516 - 10264, n=365)
4677 Points ∼55% -26%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sorteer op waarde)
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
1146 Points ∼87%
Honor 10
1316 Points ∼100% +15%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
806 Points ∼61% -30%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
1052 Points ∼80% -8%
Nokia 7 Plus
1101 Points ∼84% -4%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
1195 Points ∼91% +4%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
1108 Points ∼84% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (1092 - 1146, n=4)
1112 Points ∼84% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (7 - 1682, n=441)
672 Points ∼51% -41%
Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
2279 Points ∼52%
Honor 10
4397 Points ∼100% +93%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
1012 Points ∼23% -56%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
1625 Points ∼37% -29%
Nokia 7 Plus
2298 Points ∼52% +1%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
1331 Points ∼30% -42%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
2295 Points ∼52% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (2279 - 2298, n=4)
2290 Points ∼52% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (18 - 9248, n=441)
1505 Points ∼34% -34%
Memory (sorteer op waarde)
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
2494 Points ∼65%
Honor 10
3808 Points ∼100% +53%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
1046 Points ∼27% -58%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
2208 Points ∼58% -11%
Nokia 7 Plus
2503 Points ∼66% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
2275 Points ∼60% -9%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
2470 Points ∼65% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (2256 - 2503, n=4)
2431 Points ∼64% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (21 - 4798, n=441)
1124 Points ∼30% -55%
System (sorteer op waarde)
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
5048 Points ∼86%
Honor 10
5882 Points ∼100% +17%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
3492 Points ∼59% -31%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
4628 Points ∼79% -8%
Nokia 7 Plus
4976 Points ∼85% -1%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
4358 Points ∼74% -14%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
4797 Points ∼82% -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (4797 - 5229, n=4)
5013 Points ∼85% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (369 - 10281, n=441)
2244 Points ∼38% -56%
Overall (sorteer op waarde)
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
2394 Points ∼71%
Honor 10
3374 Points ∼100% +41%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
1314 Points ∼39% -45%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
2044 Points ∼61% -15%
Nokia 7 Plus
2369 Points ∼70% -1%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
1993 Points ∼59% -17%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
2343 Points ∼69% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (2330 - 2394, n=5)
2353 Points ∼70% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (1 - 4308, n=444)
1134 Points ∼34% -53%
Geekbench 4.1/4.2
Compute RenderScript Score (sorteer op waarde)
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
5688 Points ∼66%
Honor 10
8634 Points ∼100% +52%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
4501 Points ∼52% -21%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
3680 Points ∼43% -35%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
5486 Points ∼64% -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (5486 - 5688, n=3)
5615 Points ∼65% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (836 - 14362, n=138)
3831 Points ∼44% -33%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sorteer op waarde)
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
5856 Points ∼89%
Honor 10
6610 Points ∼100% +13%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
4369 Points ∼66% -25%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
4941 Points ∼75% -16%
Nokia 7 Plus
5867 Points ∼89% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
4431 Points ∼67% -24%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
5843 Points ∼88% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (5806 - 5867, n=5)
5844 Points ∼88% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (1131 - 10558, n=185)
3970 Points ∼60% -32%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sorteer op waarde)
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
1579 Points ∼84%
Honor 10
1890 Points ∼100% +20%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
928 Points ∼49% -41%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
1330 Points ∼70% -16%
Nokia 7 Plus
1646 Points ∼87% +4%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
1526 Points ∼81% -3%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
1620 Points ∼86% +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (1579 - 1646, n=5)
1614 Points ∼85% +2%
Average of class Smartphone (394 - 4265, n=186)
1175 Points ∼62% -26%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sorteer op waarde)
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
2628 Points ∼95%
Honor 10
2582 Points ∼94% -2%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
2132 Points ∼77% -19%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
2327 Points ∼84% -11%
Nokia 7 Plus
2749 Points ∼100% +5%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
1950 Points ∼71% -26%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
2757 Points ∼100% +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (2628 - 2757, n=4)
2718 Points ∼99% +3%
Average of class Smartphone (530 - 3669, n=290)
1554 Points ∼56% -41%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
1196 Points ∼40%
Honor 10
2993 Points ∼100% +150%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
379 Points ∼13% -68%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
815 Points ∼27% -32%
Nokia 7 Plus
1161 Points ∼39% -3%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
618 Points ∼21% -48%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
1164 Points ∼39% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (1161 - 1201, n=4)
1181 Points ∼39% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (67 - 5220, n=290)
1056 Points ∼35% -12%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sorteer op waarde)
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
1361 Points ∼47%
Honor 10
2891 Points ∼100% +112%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
464 Points ∼16% -66%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
953 Points ∼33% -30%
Nokia 7 Plus
1332 Points ∼46% -2%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
729 Points ∼25% -46%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
1335 Points ∼46% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (1332 - 1372, n=5)
1351 Points ∼47% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (83 - 4732, n=298)
1012 Points ∼35% -26%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sorteer op waarde)
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
2638 Points ∼95%
Honor 10
2773 Points ∼100% +5%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
2127 Points ∼77% -19%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
2337 Points ∼84% -11%
Nokia 7 Plus
2734 Points ∼99% +4%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
1946 Points ∼70% -26%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
2680 Points ∼97% +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (2638 - 2736, n=4)
2697 Points ∼97% +2%
Average of class Smartphone (524 - 3642, n=321)
1455 Points ∼52% -45%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
1938 Points ∼54%
Honor 10
3573 Points ∼100% +84%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
725 Points ∼20% -63%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
1333 Points ∼37% -31%
Nokia 7 Plus
1895 Points ∼53% -2%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
879 Points ∼25% -55%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
1891 Points ∼53% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (1856 - 1938, n=4)
1895 Points ∼53% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (43 - 8312, n=321)
1426 Points ∼40% -26%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sorteer op waarde)
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
2059 Points ∼61%
Honor 10
3358 Points ∼100% +63%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
849 Points ∼25% -59%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
1474 Points ∼44% -28%
Nokia 7 Plus
2035 Points ∼61% -1%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
1001 Points ∼30% -51%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
2023 Points ∼60% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (1999 - 2059, n=4)
2029 Points ∼60% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (55 - 6378, n=329)
1227 Points ∼37% -40%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sorteer op waarde)
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
19050 Points ∼90%
Honor 10
21070 Points ∼100% +11%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
17044 Points ∼81% -11%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
16939 Points ∼80% -11%
Nokia 7 Plus
20085 Points ∼95% +5%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
13306 Points ∼63% -30%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
21016 Points ∼100% +10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (19050 - 21016, n=4)
20094 Points ∼95% +5%
Average of class Smartphone (5462 - 36494, n=476)
12164 Points ∼58% -36%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sorteer op waarde)
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
29306 Points ∼90%
Honor 10
32674 Points ∼100% +11%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
13277 Points ∼41% -55%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
20908 Points ∼64% -29%
Nokia 7 Plus
29333 Points ∼90% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
15262 Points ∼47% -48%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
28984 Points ∼89% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (26322 - 29333, n=4)
28486 Points ∼87% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (2396 - 113380, n=476)
15585 Points ∼48% -47%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sorteer op waarde)
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
26175 Points ∼90%
Honor 10
29111 Points ∼100% +11%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
13963 Points ∼48% -47%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
19873 Points ∼68% -24%
Nokia 7 Plus
26610 Points ∼91% +2%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
14779 Points ∼51% -44%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
26731 Points ∼92% +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (24669 - 26731, n=4)
26046 Points ∼89% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (2841 - 64405, n=477)
13472 Points ∼46% -49%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sorteer op waarde)
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
46 fps ∼37%
Honor 10
124 fps ∼100% +170%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
23 fps ∼19% -50%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
36 fps ∼29% -22%
Nokia 7 Plus
50 fps ∼40% +9%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
34 fps ∼27% -26%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
50 fps ∼40% +9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (43 - 50, n=4)
47.3 fps ∼38% +3%
Average of class Smartphone (4.1 - 177, n=502)
27 fps ∼22% -41%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sorteer op waarde)
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
51 fps ∼86%
Honor 10
59 fps ∼100% +16%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
22 fps ∼37% -57%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
35 fps ∼59% -31%
Nokia 7 Plus
48 fps ∼81% -6%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
31 fps ∼53% -39%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
48 fps ∼81% -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (48 - 52, n=4)
49.8 fps ∼84% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (6.9 - 120, n=505)
23.5 fps ∼40% -54%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sorteer op waarde)
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
23 fps ∼39%
Honor 10
59 fps ∼100% +157%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
9.8 fps ∼17% -57%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
16 fps ∼27% -30%
Nokia 7 Plus
23 fps ∼39% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
16 fps ∼27% -30%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
23 fps ∼39% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (21 - 23, n=4)
22.5 fps ∼38% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (1.6 - 88.2, n=425)
14.4 fps ∼24% -37%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sorteer op waarde)
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
22 fps ∼44%
Honor 10
50 fps ∼100% +127%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
9.6 fps ∼19% -56%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
15 fps ∼30% -32%
Nokia 7 Plus
22 fps ∼44% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
15 fps ∼30% -32%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
21 fps ∼42% -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (21 - 23, n=4)
22 fps ∼44% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (4.1 - 115, n=427)
14.5 fps ∼29% -34%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
15 fps ∼38%
Honor 10
39 fps ∼100% +160%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
6.4 fps ∼16% -57%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
10 fps ∼26% -33%
Nokia 7 Plus
14 fps ∼36% -7%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
9.9 fps ∼25% -34%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
15 fps ∼38% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (13 - 15, n=4)
14.3 fps ∼37% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (1.2 - 60, n=288)
12.5 fps ∼32% -17%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
14 fps ∼41%
Honor 10
34 fps ∼100% +143%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
6.3 fps ∼19% -55%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
9.8 fps ∼29% -30%
Nokia 7 Plus
15 fps ∼44% +7%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
9.6 fps ∼28% -31%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
14 fps ∼41% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (12 - 15, n=5)
14 fps ∼41% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (2.5 - 110, n=290)
12.6 fps ∼37% -10%
GFXBench 4.0
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
9.1 fps ∼40%
Honor 10
23 fps ∼100% +153%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
3.5 fps ∼15% -62%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
6.3 fps ∼27% -31%
Nokia 7 Plus
8.3 fps ∼36% -9%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
6 fps ∼26% -34%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
9 fps ∼39% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (8.3 - 9.1, n=4)
8.85 fps ∼38% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (0.76 - 35, n=219)
8.51 fps ∼37% -6%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
8.6 fps ∼43%
Honor 10
20 fps ∼100% +133%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
3.5 fps ∼18% -59%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
6 fps ∼30% -30%
Nokia 7 Plus
9.1 fps ∼46% +6%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
5.8 fps ∼29% -33%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
8.6 fps ∼43% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (8.6 - 9.8, n=5)
8.94 fps ∼45% +4%
Average of class Smartphone (1.3 - 50, n=222)
7.82 fps ∼39% -9%
Lightmark - 1920x1080 1080p (sorteer op waarde)
Nokia 7 Plus
15.07 fps ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
3.052 fps ∼20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660
15.1 fps ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone (1.06 - 38.7, n=72)
12.1 fps ∼80%
Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sorteer op waarde)
Nokia 7 Plus
349 Points ∼61%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
355 Points ∼62%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
353 Points ∼62%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (349 - 353, n=2)
351 Points ∼61%
Average of class Smartphone (36.3 - 1702, n=62)
573 Points ∼100%

Legende

 
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Qualcomm Adreno 512, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Honor 10 HiSilicon Kirin 970, ARM Mali-G72 MP12, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
BQ Aquaris X Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 626, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Motorola Moto Z3 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Qualcomm Adreno 509, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
 
Nokia 7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Qualcomm Adreno 512, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018 Samsung Exynos 7885, ARM Mali-G71 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Xiaomi Mi 6X Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Qualcomm Adreno 512, 64 GB eMMC Flash
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
Honor 10 (Chrome 66)
56.506 Points ∼100% +14%
Nokia 7 Plus (Chrome 60)
53.89 Points ∼95% +9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (49.4 - 53.9, n=4)
52.2 Points ∼92% +6%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro (Chrome 67)
49.396 Points ∼87%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018 (Chrome 64.0.3282.137)
49.07 Points ∼87% -1%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play (Chrome 67)
44.587 Points ∼79% -10%
BQ Aquaris X2 (Chrome 67)
44.245 Points ∼78% -10%
Average of class Smartphone (11.4 - 224, n=360)
33.7 Points ∼60% -32%
BQ Aquaris X Pro (Chrome 59.0.3071.125)
26.837 Points ∼47% -46%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Honor 10 (Chrome 66)
10965 Points ∼100% +14%
Nokia 7 Plus (Chrome 60)
10945 Points ∼100% +14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (9582 - 10945, n=5)
10068 Points ∼92% +5%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro (Chrome 67)
9582 Points ∼87%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018 (Chrome 64.0.3282.137)
9350 Points ∼85% -2%
BQ Aquaris X2 (Chrome 67)
9004 Points ∼82% -6%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play (Chrome 67)
8519 Points ∼78% -11%
Average of class Smartphone (1506 - 35255, n=496)
5011 Points ∼46% -48%
BQ Aquaris X Pro (Chrome 59.0.3071.125)
4424 Points ∼40% -54%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (718 - 59466, n=515)
11883 ms * ∼100% -190%
BQ Aquaris X Pro (Chrome 59.0.3071.125)
8741.5 ms * ∼74% -114%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play (Chrome 67)
4820 ms * ∼41% -18%
BQ Aquaris X2
4733 ms * ∼40% -16%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018 (Chrome 64.0.3282.137)
4275.2 ms * ∼36% -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (3927 - 4769, n=4)
4182 ms * ∼35% -2%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro (Chrome 67)
4093.5 ms * ∼34%
Nokia 7 Plus (Chrome 60)
3937.3 ms * ∼33% +4%
Honor 10 (Chrome 66)
3899 ms * ∼33% +5%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
Honor 10 (Chrome 66)
182 Points ∼100% +14%
Nokia 7 Plus (Chrome 60)
168 Points ∼92% +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (159 - 173, n=3)
167 Points ∼92% +5%
BQ Aquaris X2 (Chrome 67)
164 Points ∼90% +3%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro (Chrome 67)
159 Points ∼87%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018 (Chrome 64.0.3282.137)
156 Points ∼86% -2%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
154 Points ∼85% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (27 - 362, n=246)
99.4 Points ∼55% -37%
BQ Aquaris X Pro (Chrome 59.0.3071.125)
86 Points ∼47% -46%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Honor 10 (Chrome 66)
69 Points ∼100% +19%
Nokia 7 Plus (Chrome 60)
63 Points ∼91% +9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (58 - 63, n=3)
60.7 Points ∼88% +5%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro (Chrome 67)
58 Points ∼84%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play (Chrome 67)
55 Points ∼80% -5%
BQ Aquaris X2 (Chrome 67)
54 Points ∼78% -7%
Average of class Smartphone (0 - 130, n=35)
54 Points ∼78% -7%

* ... kleiner is beter

BQ Aquaris X2 ProBQ Aquaris X ProNokia 7 PlusSamsung Galaxy A8 2018Motorola Moto Z3 PlayAverage 64 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-18%
7%
2%
75%
-11%
-32%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
61.13 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
49.77 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-19%
62.31
2%
62.29 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
2%
62.7
3%
51.9 (19.6 - 74.7, n=49)
-15%
43.8 (6.38 - 87.1, n=270)
-28%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
83.35 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
78.69 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-6%
82.21
-1%
77.92 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-7%
83.7
0%
70.2 (21.1 - 86.9, n=49)
-16%
62.1 (10.8 - 96.5, n=270)
-25%
Random Write 4KB
15.43
12.07
-22%
19.62
27%
14.69
-5%
84.1
445%
15.4 (3.4 - 71.1, n=57)
0%
13.5 (0.14 - 164, n=549)
-13%
Random Read 4KB
51.25
37.97
-26%
54.65
7%
82.62
61%
60.6
18%
48.1 (11.4 - 149, n=57)
-6%
34.5 (1.59 - 173, n=549)
-33%
Sequential Write 256KB
204.83
139.63
-32%
211.6
3%
104.2
-49%
182.5
-11%
160 (40 - 216, n=57)
-22%
71.7 (2.99 - 228, n=549)
-65%
Sequential Read 256KB
280.78
270.46
-4%
283.12
1%
299.94
7%
271.7
-3%
266 (115 - 704, n=57)
-5%
211 (12.1 - 832, n=549)
-25%
Asphalt 8: Airborne
 InstellingenWaarde
 high30 fps
PUBG Mobile
 InstellingenWaarde
 HD30 fps
Max. Belasting
 40.1 °C39.1 °C39.9 °C 
 39.9 °C39 °C38.9 °C 
 39.5 °C37.5 °C37.2 °C 
Maximum: 40.1 °C
Gemiddelde: 39 °C
35.8 °C38.6 °C39.1 °C
35.9 °C37.8 °C37.3 °C
35.4 °C37.3 °C37.4 °C
Maximum: 39.1 °C
Gemiddelde: 37.2 °C
Stroomadapter (max.)  30.2 °C | Kamertemperatuur 20.1 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2033.929.52528.437.73136.130.54030.929.25030.6326322.225.68024.922.310024.422.712523.52716020.327.720019.845.725018.249.231517.458.240016.661.950017.16263015.961.380015.957.1100015.963.6125016.773.316001674.5200015.970.9250016.272.8315016.471.540001774.1500016.573.3630016.468.4800016.665.6100001765.31250016.5571600016.949.2SPL28.683.2N1.151.8median 16.6BQ Aquaris X2 Promedian 62Delta1.69.835.244.432.941.737.232.531.737.339.641.828.335.827.335.926.934.126.7362439.920.944.820.952.219.550.118.554.117.564.817.561.815.769.215.873.816.675.115.874.115.474.115.574.71675.915.8741672.216.374.316.371.916.268.216.456.416.452.128.685.31.161.3median 16.4Nokia 7 Plusmedian 68.22.111.9hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 44% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 46% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 68% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Nokia 7 Plus audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 24% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 66% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 54% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 38% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Stroomgebruik
Uit / Standbydarklight 0.01 / 0.13 Watt
Inactiefdarkmidlight 0.63 / 2.16 / 2.18 Watt
Belasting midlight 4.48 / 7.87 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
3100 mAh
BQ Aquaris X Pro
3100 mAh
Nokia 7 Plus
3800 mAh
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
3000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
3000 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
11%
4%
-14%
27%
7%
7%
Idle Minimum *
0.63
0.67
-6%
0.65
-3%
1.3
-106%
0.67
-6%
0.623 (0.56 - 0.65, n=4)
1%
0.866 (0.2 - 3.4, n=576)
-37%
Idle Average *
2.16
1.7
21%
1.76
19%
2
7%
1.02
53%
1.843 (1.51 - 2.16, n=4)
15%
1.697 (0.6 - 6.2, n=575)
21%
Idle Maximum *
2.18
1.78
18%
1.78
18%
2.7
-24%
1.1
50%
1.868 (1.54 - 2.18, n=4)
14%
1.945 (0.74 - 6.6, n=576)
11%
Load Average *
4.48
4.42
1%
4.47
-0%
3.7
17%
3.86
14%
4.39 (3.94 - 4.65, n=4)
2%
3.97 (0.8 - 10.8, n=570)
11%
Load Maximum *
7.87
6.3
20%
9.13
-16%
5.1
35%
5.97
24%
7.7 (5.93 - 9.13, n=4)
2%
5.6 (1.2 - 14.2, n=570)
29%

* ... kleiner is beter

Batterijduur
Inactief (zonder WLAN, minimale helderheid)
22h 54min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3 (Chrome 67)
10h 05min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
10h 58min
Belast (maximale helderheid)
2h 25min
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
3100 mAh
Honor 10
3400 mAh
BQ Aquaris X Pro
3100 mAh
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
3000 mAh
Nokia 7 Plus
3800 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
3000 mAh
BQ Aquaris X2
3100 mAh
Batterijduur
11%
32%
6%
13%
34%
2%
Reader / Idle
1374
1162
-15%
1840
34%
1245
-9%
1703
24%
1546
13%
H.264
658
662
1%
644
-2%
648
-2%
706
7%
908
38%
WiFi v1.3
605
663
10%
730
21%
595
-2%
672
11%
646
7%
617
2%
Load
145
216
49%
254
75%
199
37%
158
9%
260
79%

Pro

+ helder LTPS-scherm
+ snel SoC
+ opslag uitbreidbaar
+ Android One
+ USB 3.1 met beeld-output
+ precieze localisatie
+ prima dual-camera
+ QC4-support
+ snelle Wi-Fi

Contra

- scherm zou meer accurate kleuren mogen hebben
- noch VoLTE noch VoWifi
- weinig LTE-banden ondersteund
- bouwkwaliteit niet perfect
- Hybrid-SIM (geen volwaardige Dual-SIM)
Onder de loep: BQ Aquaris X2 Pro. Testtoestel voorzien door BQ Germany.
Onder de loep: BQ Aquaris X2 Pro. Testtoestel voorzien door BQ Germany.

Dit is de verkorte versie van het originele artikel. Het volledige, Engelse testrapport vind je hier.

BQ heeft beslist om de twee modellen van de nieuwe X2-serie gelijkaardiger te maken en heeft beide versies uitgerust met dezelfde camera's. De enige verschillen hebben dus betrekking op het materiaal van de behuizing, de opslag, het geheugen en de processor. Als je de twee 64-GB-versies met elkaar vergelijkt is het enige verschil het materiaal van de achterkant van de telefoon, de SoC en 50 euro in aankoopprijs. Al bij al is het een kwestie van voorkeur - de opties zijn glas of plastic. Tenminste, tenzij je van de smartphone verwacht dat je er veeleisende games mee kan spelen. In dat geval zal je moeten opteren voor de Pro-versie. Persoonlijk vinden we dat de meerprijs van ongeveer 120 euro een beetje te veel is voor het grotere geheugen (6 GB RAM) en interne opslag (128 GB) - we betwijfelen dan ook of de Pro-versie een groot succes zal worden.

De Aquaris X2 Pro is een geslaagde update van BQ's duurste smartphone, maar verdient toch een aantal punten van kritiek.

De X2 Pro overtuig ons met zijn features, zijn helder scherm, lange batterijduur en goede camera's. De nieuwe dual-cameramodule schiet uitstekende foto's - het is alleen jammer dat Samsung's geweldige sensor niet meer wordt gebruikt. Als BQ dit niet had veranderd, zouden de camera's misschien nog beter zijn geweest. De fabrikant zou ook een optie hebben kunnen toegevoegd voor een meer natuurlijke kleurweergave op het scherm.

We waren erg tevreden met de telefoonfunctionaliteit van de BQ Aquaris X2 Pro. Het is jammer dat de overdrachtsnelheid beperkt is tot LTE Cat. 6, maar we kunnen er mee leven. Wat veel moeilijk te begrijpen is, is dat een Europese fabrikant niet alle frequentiebanden die gebruikt worden in de EU ondersteunt en waarom VoLTE en VoWifi evenmin worden ondersteund vanaf dag 1. Deze minpunten gooien roet in het eten voor een anders degelijke smartphone.

BQ Aquaris X2 Pro - 26-07-2018 v6
Daniel Schmidt

Behuizing
83%
Toetsenbord
66 / 75 → 88%
Aanwijsapparaat
92%
Aansluitmogelijkheden
58 / 60 → 97%
Gewicht
91%
Batterij
92%
Beeldscherm
85%
Gaming-performance
54 / 63 → 85%
Applicatie-performance
60 / 70 → 85%
Temperatuur
88%
Luidheid
100%
Audio
75 / 91 → 82%
Camera
73%
Gemiddelde
78%
86%
Smartphone - Gewogen Gemiddelde

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Overzichten en testrapporten over laptops en mobieltjes > Testrapporten > Kort testrapport BQ Aquaris X2 Pro Smartphone
Daniel Schmidt, 2018-07-29 (Update: 2018-07-29)