Kort testrapport Apple MacBook Pro 13 2019: Entry-Level Pro met Touch Bar
Evaluatie | Datum | Model | Gewicht | Hoogte | Formaat | Resolutie | Best Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 91 % | 02-2020 | Apple MacBook Pro 13 2019 2TB3 i5-8257U, Iris Plus Graphics 645 | 1.4 kg | 14.9 mm | 13.30" | 2560x1600 | |
| 91 % | 10-2019 | Apple MacBook Pro 13 2019 i5 4TB3 i5-8279U, Iris Plus Graphics 655 | 1.4 kg | 14.9 mm | 13.30" | 2560x1600 | |
| 88 % | 07-2017 | Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017 i5-7360U, Iris Plus Graphics 640 | 1.4 kg | 14.9 mm | 13.30" | 2560x1600 | |
| 86 % | 08-2019 | Apple Macbook Air 2019 i5-8210Y, UHD Graphics 617 | 1.3 kg | 15.6 mm | 13.30" | 2560x1600 | |
| 88 % | 02-2019 | Dell XPS 13 9380 i7 4K i7-8565U, UHD Graphics 620 | 1.2 kg | 11.6 mm | 13.30" | 3840x2160 | |
| 86 % | 10-2019 | Razer Blade Stealth i7-1065G7 Iris Plus i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | 1.4 kg | 15.3 mm | 13.30" | 1920x1080 | |
| 85 % | 08-2019 | HP Envy 13-aq0003ng i7-8565U, GeForce MX250 | 1.2 kg | 14.7 mm | 13.30" | 1920x1080 |
Top 10 Testrapporten
» Top 10 Multimedia Notebooks
» Top 10 Gaming-Notebooks
» Top 10 Budget Gaming Laptops
» Top 10 Lichtgewicht Gaming-Notebooks
» Top 10 Premium Office/Business-Notebooks
» Top 10 Budget Office/Business-Notebooks
» Top 10 Workstation-Laptops
» Top 10 Subnotebooks
» Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Top 10 Notebooks tot €300
» Top 10 Notebooks tot €500
» Top 10 Notebooks tot € 1.000De beste notebookbeeldschermen zoals getest door Notebookcheck
» De beste notebookbeeldschermen
» Top Windows Alternatieven voor de MacBook Pro 13
» Top Windows Alternatieven voor de MacBook Pro 15
» Top Windows alternatieven voor de MacBook 12 en Air
» Top 10 best verkopende notebooks op Amazon
» Top 10 Convertible Notebooks
» Top 10 Tablets
» Top 10 Tablets tot € 250
» Top 10 Smartphones
» Top 10 Phablets (>90cm²)
» Top 10 Camera Smartphones
» Top 10 Smartphones tot €500
» Top 10 best verkopende smartphones op Amazon
Size Comparison
| Networking | |
| iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10 | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 13 2019 i5 4TB3 | |
| Dell XPS 13 9380 i7 4K | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (30.9 - 1658, n=191) | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017 | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 13 2019 2TB3 | |
| Apple Macbook Air 2019 | |
| HP Envy 13-aq0003ng | |
| iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10 | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 13 2019 i5 4TB3 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (36 - 1614, n=191) | |
| HP Envy 13-aq0003ng | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 13 2019 2TB3 | |
| Dell XPS 13 9380 i7 4K | |
| Apple Macbook Air 2019 | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017 | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Helderheidsverdeling: 92 %
Helderheid in Batterij-modus: 602 cd/m²
Contrast: 1723:1 (Zwart: 0.35 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.7 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.7, calibrated: 0.7
ΔE Greyscale 2.1 | 0.64-98 Ø5.9
99.4% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 76.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.18
| Apple MacBook Pro 13 2019 2TB3 APPA03D, IPS, 2560x1600, 13.30 | Apple MacBook Pro 13 2019 i5 4TB3 APPA03E, IPS, 2560x1600, 13.30 | Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017 APPA033, IPS, 2560x1600, 13.30 | Apple Macbook Air 2019 APPA041, IPS, 2560x1600, 13.30 | Dell XPS 13 9380 i7 4K ID: AUO 282B B133ZAN Dell: 90NTH, IPS, 3840x2160, 13.30 | Razer Blade Stealth i7-1065G7 Iris Plus Sharp LQ133M1JW41, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.30 | HP Envy 13-aq0003ng InfoVision M133NVF3 R2, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.30 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Response Times | 15% | 17% | 9% | -19% | -21% | -9% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 50.4 (24.4, 26) | 43.2 (22, 21.2) 14% | 42.8 (22.4, 20.4) 15% | 42.4 (21.2, 21.2) 16% | 64.8 (31.6, 33.2) -29% | 45.2 (22.4, 22.8) 10% | 31 (15, 16) 38% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 35.2 (19.6, 15.6) | 29.6 (15.6, 14) 16% | 28.8 (14.8, 14) 18% | 29.6 (16, 13.6) 16% | 38 (19.2, 18.8) -8% | 33.2 (17.6, 15.6) 6% | 24 (14, 10) 32% |
| PWM Frequency | 116300 (66) | 111100 (66) -4% | 22730 (24) -80% | 4000 (90) -97% | |||
| Screen | -26% | -6% | -8% | -45% | -5% | -51% | |
| Brightness middle | 603 | 518 -14% | 588 -2% | 421 -30% | 428.3 -29% | 422.6 -30% | 768 27% |
| Brightness | 577 | 480 -17% | 561 -3% | 393 -32% | 414 -28% | 404 -30% | 778 35% |
| Brightness Distribution | 92 | 87 -5% | 92 0% | 88 -4% | 88 -4% | 87 -5% | 82 -11% |
| Black Level * | 0.35 | 0.34 3% | 0.45 -29% | 0.34 3% | 0.27 23% | 0.35 -0% | 0.48 -37% |
| Contrast | 1723 | 1524 -12% | 1307 -24% | 1238 -28% | 1586 -8% | 1207 -30% | 1600 -7% |
| Colorchecker DeltaE2000 * | 1.7 | 1.5 12% | 1.7 -0% | 1.5 12% | 2.69 -58% | 1.02 40% | 3.49 -105% |
| Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. * | 3.1 | 2.8 10% | 3.5 -13% | 3.8 -23% | 6.19 -100% | 3.06 1% | 7.41 -139% |
| Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated * | 0.7 | 2.6 -271% | 2.01 -187% | 0.95 -36% | 2.07 -196% | ||
| Greyscale DeltaE2000 * | 2.1 | 2 5% | 1.9 10% | 1.2 43% | 3.7 -76% | 1 52% | 4.09 -95% |
| Gamma | 2.18 101% | 2.22 99% | 2.33 94% | 2.21 100% | 2.1 105% | 2.21 100% | 2.54 87% |
| CCT | 6843 95% | 6898 94% | 6738 96% | 6694 97% | 6706 97% | 6502 100% | 6452 101% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 76.7 | 78.4 2% | 77.92 2% | 61.3 -20% | 60.4 -21% | 62.1 -19% | 60 -22% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 99.4 | 99.9 1% | 99.94 1% | 94.6 -5% | 93.5 -6% | 97.1 -2% | 92 -7% |
| Totaal Gemiddelde (Programma / Instellingen) | -6% /
-20% | 6% /
-2% | 1% /
-4% | -32% /
-41% | -13% /
-9% | -30% /
-42% |
* ... kleiner is beter
Responstijd Scherm
| ↔ Responstijd Zwart naar Wit | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35.2 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd | ↗ 19.6 ms stijging |  |
| ↘ 15.6 ms daling | ||
| Het scherm vertoonde trage responstijden in onze tests en is misschien te traag voor games. Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.8 (minimum) tot 240 (maximum) ms. » 91 % van alle toestellen zijn beter. Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd slechter is dan het gemiddelde (24.4 ms) van alle geteste toestellen. | ||
| ↔ Responstijd 50% Grijs naar 80% Grijs | ||
| 50.4 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd | ↗ 24.4 ms stijging |  |
| ↘ 26 ms daling | ||
| Het scherm vertoonde trage responstijden in onze tests en is misschien te traag voor games. Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.8 (minimum) tot 636 (maximum) ms. » 83 % van alle toestellen zijn beter. Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd slechter is dan het gemiddelde (38.7 ms) van alle geteste toestellen. | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM waargenomen | 116300 Hz | ≤ 66 % helderheid instelling |  |
Het backlight van het scherm flikkert aan 116300 Hz (hoogstwaarschijnlijk met PWM - Pulse-Width Modulation) aan een helderheid van 66 % en lager. Boven deze helderheid zou er geen flickering / PWM mogen optreden. De frequentie van 116300 Hz is redelijk hoog en de meeste mensen die gevoelig zijn aan flickering zouden dit dus niet mogen waarnemen of geïrriteerde ogen krijgen. Ter vergelijking: 51 % van alle geteste toestellen maakten geen gebruik van PWM om de schermhelderheid te verlagen. Als het wel werd gebruikt, werd een gemiddelde van 9725 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 142900) Hz waargenomen. | |||
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3986 punten | |
| PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 5589 punten | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4238 punten | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 3751 punten | |
Help | ||
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 3238 punten | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 1736 punten | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 624 punten | |
Help | ||
| lage | gem. | hoge | ultra | ||
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 104.6 | 60 | 51.6 | 22.1 | fps |
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 76.5 | 57.3 | 29 | 26.9 | fps |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 37.4 | 26.1 | 22.5 | fps |
Geluidsniveau
| Onbelast |
| 29.5 / 29.5 / 29.5 dB (A) |
| Belasting |
| 31.1 / 39.3 dB (A) |
 | ||
30 dB stil 40 dB(A) hoorbaar 50 dB(A) luid |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm afstand) environment noise: 29.5 dB(A) | ||
| Apple MacBook Pro 13 2019 2TB3 Iris Plus Graphics 645, i5-8257U, Apple SSD AP0256 | Apple MacBook Pro 13 2019 i5 4TB3 Iris Plus Graphics 655, i5-8279U, Apple SSD AP0512 | Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017 Iris Plus Graphics 640, i5-7360U, Apple SSD AP0128 | Apple Macbook Air 2019 UHD Graphics 617, i5-8210Y, Apple SSD AP0256 | Dell XPS 13 9380 i7 4K UHD Graphics 620, i7-8565U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Razer Blade Stealth i7-1065G7 Iris Plus Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i7-1065G7, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ | HP Envy 13-aq0003ng GeForce MX250, i7-8565U, Toshiba KBG30ZMV512G | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -1% | -2% | -2% | -4% | -3% | -2% | |
| off / environment * | 29.5 | 29 2% | 30.2 -2% | 29.5 -0% | 28.4 4% | 28.3 4% | 30 -2% |
| Idle Minimum * | 29.5 | 29 2% | 30.2 -2% | 29.5 -0% | 29.4 -0% | 28.3 4% | 30 -2% |
| Idle Average * | 29.5 | 29 2% | 30.2 -2% | 29.5 -0% | 29.4 -0% | 28.3 4% | 30 -2% |
| Idle Maximum * | 29.5 | 29 2% | 30.2 -2% | 29.5 -0% | 29.4 -0% | 28.3 4% | 30 -2% |
| Load Average * | 31.1 | 33.9 -9% | 32.9 -6% | 34 -9% | 34.6 -11% | 33.5 -8% | |
| Load Maximum * | 39.3 | 41.8 -6% | 39.3 -0% | 41 -4% | 46.8 -19% | 49.4 -26% | 39.5 -1% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 34.5 |
* ... kleiner is beter
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.9 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 35.7 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22 to 57 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45.1 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 39.5 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.8 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 30.6 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (32.1 °C / 89.8 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.4 °C / 83.1 F (-3.7 °C / -6.7 F).
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2019 2TB3 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 17% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 79% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 19%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 10% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 87% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2019 i5 4TB3 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 10% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 86% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 19%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 7% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%
| Uit / Standby | 0.06 / 0.26 Watt |
| Inactief | 2.1 / 6.9 / 7.8 Watt |
| Belasting |
42 / 64.5 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 13 2019 2TB3 i5-8257U, Iris Plus Graphics 645, Apple SSD AP0256, IPS, 2560x1600, 13.30 | Apple MacBook Pro 13 2019 i5 4TB3 i5-8279U, Iris Plus Graphics 655, Apple SSD AP0512, IPS, 2560x1600, 13.30 | Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017 i5-7360U, Iris Plus Graphics 640, Apple SSD AP0128, IPS, 2560x1600, 13.30 | Dell XPS 13 9380 i7 4K i7-8565U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS, 3840x2160, 13.30 | Razer Blade Stealth i7-1065G7 Iris Plus i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.30 | HP Envy 13-aq0003ng i7-8565U, GeForce MX250, Toshiba KBG30ZMV512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.30 | Average Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 | Average of class Subnotebook | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -8% | -5% | -37% | -45% | -32% | -4% | -47% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 2.1 | 2.2 -5% | 3.7 -76% | 5.2 -148% | 5.9 -181% | 3.9 -86% | 2.2 (2.1 - 2.3, n=2) -5% | 6.31 (1.67 - 36, n=670) -200% |
| Idle Average * | 6.9 | 7.2 -4% | 5.2 25% | 8.6 -25% | 8.1 -17% | 7.8 -13% | 7.4 (6.9 - 7.9, n=2) -7% | 9.51 (5 - 39, n=670) -38% |
| Idle Maximum * | 7.8 | 8.2 -5% | 7.6 3% | 10.5 -35% | 11.2 -44% | 10.8 -38% | 8.2 (7.8 - 8.6, n=2) -5% | 11.8 (3.9 - 55, n=670) -51% |
| Load Average * | 42 | 54 -29% | 41.6 1% | 44.2 -5% | 44.3 -5% | 53 -26% | 44 (42 - 46, n=2) -5% | 33.6 (6.3 - 79.2, n=661) 20% |
| Load Maximum * | 64.5 | 63.9 1% | 50.5 22% | 47.5 26% | 50.2 22% | 62.7 3% | 64.3 (64 - 64.5, n=2) -0% | 41.1 (7.6 - 111, n=663) 36% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 41.9 |
* ... kleiner is beter
| Apple MacBook Pro 13 2019 2TB3 i5-8257U, Iris Plus Graphics 645, 58.2 Wh | Apple MacBook Pro 13 2019 i5 4TB3 i5-8279U, Iris Plus Graphics 655, 58 Wh | Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017 i5-7360U, Iris Plus Graphics 640, 54.5 Wh | Apple Macbook Air 2019 i5-8210Y, UHD Graphics 617, 49.9 Wh | Dell XPS 13 9380 i7 4K i7-8565U, UHD Graphics 620, 52 Wh | Razer Blade Stealth i7-1065G7 Iris Plus i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), 53.1 Wh | HP Envy 13-aq0003ng i7-8565U, GeForce MX250, 53.2 Wh | Average of class Subnotebook | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -12% | -12% | -9% | -40% | -25% | -34% | -17% | |
| WiFi Websurfing 1.3 | 777 | 687 -12% | 681 -12% | 689 -11% | 464 -40% | 583 -25% | 512 -34% | 509 (206 - 1223, n=294) -34% |
| WiFi Websurfing 1.3 max Brightness | 445 | 419 -6% | 450 (261 - 612, n=32) 1% |
Pro
Contra
Samenvatting – Goedkoper is beter
Voor het volledige, Engelse testrapport, klik hier.
Na onze tests van de twee MacBook Pro 13-modellen is ons oordeel vrij duidelijk: het goedkopere model is de betere keuze voor de meeste gebruikers. Het enige echte nadeel is het lagere aantal Thunderbolt 3-poorten. De prestaties zijn ook iets lager, maar we zijn positief verrast door de kleinere MBP 13 om eerlijk te zijn. De officiële specificaties van Apple suggereren een grotere kloof, maar het werkelijke verschil is erg klein en niet merkbaar in dagelijkse situaties.
Het scherm is buitengewoon goed en al met al is de MacBook Pro 13 een geweldig totaalpakket. Het enige probleem is nog steeds het toetsenbord (of potentiële betrouwbaarheidsproblemen). Volgens Apple zijn er verbeteringen doorgevoerd, maar de slechte ervaringen van de voorgaande jaren schetsen geen geweldig beeld voor de input van Butterfly. Als je nu een nieuw subnotebook nodig hebt, is dit model zeker een aanrader. Echter, geruchten suggereren dat de volgende MBP 13 (of MBP 14) het nieuwe toetsenbord zal krijgen, dus over een paar maanden krijg je misschien een nog beter apparaat.
De goedkopere MacBook Pro 13 is de betere keuze in de line-up van Apple. Bijna net zo snel als het duurdere model en veel krachtiger dan de MacBook Air.
Dit laat ons achter met de vergelijking van de iets compactere MacBook Air. De Air is een beetje goedkoper, maar nog steeds geen koopje voor meer dan €1300. De MacBook Pro 13 is daarentegen veel krachtiger en heeft een nog beter beeldscherm, dus we raden de MacBook Pro 13 duidelijk aan. Dit model zou de komende jaren ook veel beter moeten presteren.
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2019 2TB3 - 04-02-2020 v7
Andreas Osthoff
