Notebookcheck

Kort testrapport MSI P65 Creator 9SF (i9-9880H, RTX2070 Max-Q) Laptop

Mike Wobker, 👁 Sebastian Jentsch, 09-06-2019

Voor creatievelingen die prestaties nodig hebben. De MSI P65 Creator richt zich op content creators die een notebook nodig hebben met veel spierballen. Maar gamers zullen net zo in hun sas zijn met dit notebook dankzij de ingebouwde RTX grafische kaart - zeker omdat het een eenvoudiger design heeft dan de meeste game notebooks. Lees in ons testrapport wat de MSI P65 9SF verder heeft te bieden.

MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657 (P65 Serie)
Processor
Intel Core i9-9880H
Grafische kaart
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q - 8192 MB, Core: 300 MHz, Geheugen: 405 MHz, TU106M, GeForce 430.64, Intel UHD Graphics 630
Geheugen
32768 MB 
, Dual-channel, DDR4 SDRAM
Beeldscherm
15.6 inch 16:9, 3840 x 2160 pixel 283 PPI, AU Optronics AUO41EB, IPS, glimmend: nee
Moederbord
Intel Cannon Lake HM370
Opslag
2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ (RAID 0),  GB 
, 880 GB beschikbaar
Geluidskaart
Intel Cannon Lake-H/S - cAVS (Audio, Voice, Speech)
Verbindingen
3 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Verbindingen: 1x microfoon, 1x koptelefoon, 1 Vingerafdruklezer
Netwerkmogelijkheden
Qualcomm Atheros AR8171/8175 PCI-E Gigabit Ethernet (10/100/1000MBit), Intel Cannon Lake-H/S CNVi: WiFi (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 5
Afmetingen
hoogte x breedte x diepte (in mm): 18 x 357 x 247
Batterij
82 Wh Lithium-Ion
Besturingssysteem
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
Bijkomende functionaliteiten
Luidsprekers: 2, Toetsenbord: chiclet, Toetsenbordverlichting: ja, MSI Creator Center, MSI Driver & App Helper, Photo Director 8, Power Director, 24 Maanden Garantie
Gewicht
1.9 kg, Voeding: 908 g
Prijs
3200 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657

Size Comparison

386 mm 262 mm 38 mm 3.5 kg360 mm 252 mm 19 mm 2.1 kg357 mm 247 mm 18 mm 1.9 kg356 mm 250 mm 18.9 mm 2.1 kg355 mm 235 mm 17.8 mm 2.1 kg
Left: Kensington Lock, RJ45-LAN, 2x USB 3.1, headphones, microphone
Left: Kensington Lock, RJ45-LAN, 2x USB 3.1, headphones, microphone
Right: USB 3.1, Thunderbolt 3, MiniDisplayPort, HDMI, DC-in
Right: USB 3.1, Thunderbolt 3, MiniDisplayPort, HDMI, DC-in
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing
Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter
693 MBit/s ∼100% +41%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
684 MBit/s ∼99% +40%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
680 MBit/s ∼98% +39%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
678 MBit/s ∼98% +38%
Average of class Multimedia
  (44 - 949, n=128)
495 MBit/s ∼71% +1%
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657
Intel Cannon Lake-H/S CNVi: WiFi
490 (min: 376, max: 596) MBit/s ∼71%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
683 MBit/s ∼100% +5%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
680 MBit/s ∼100% +5%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
655 MBit/s ∼96% +1%
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing
Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter
654 MBit/s ∼96% +1%
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657
Intel Cannon Lake-H/S CNVi: WiFi
650 (min: 629, max: 713) MBit/s ∼95%
Average of class Multimedia
  (46.1 - 949, n=127)
473 MBit/s ∼69% -27%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700710720Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø489 (376-596)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10: Ø650 (629-713)
444
cd/m²
421
cd/m²
426
cd/m²
505
cd/m²
445
cd/m²
480
cd/m²
469
cd/m²
470
cd/m²
497
cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 505 cd/m² Gemiddelde: 461.9 cd/m² Minimum: 0.3 cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling: 83 %
Helderheid in Batterij-modus: 476 cd/m²
Contrast: 890:1 (Zwart: 0.5 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.75 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6.1
ΔE Greyscale 4.49 | 0.64-98 Ø6.3
100% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 87% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.49
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657
AU Optronics AUO41EB, , 3840x2160, 15.6
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
LG Philips LGD05C0, , 1920x1080, 15.6
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
AU Optronics B156HAN08.2 (AUO82ED), , 1920x1080, 15.6
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing
AU Optronics B156HAN07.0 (AUO70ED), , 1920x1080, 15.6
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
LGD05C0, , 1920x1080, 15.6
Response Times
65%
79%
62%
62%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
51 (24, 27)
16.8 (9.2, 7.6)
67%
7.2 (3.8, 3.4)
86%
17.6 (9.2, 8.4)
65%
16.4 (8.8, 7.6)
68%
Response Time Black / White *
31 (18, 13)
11.6 (7.2, 4.4)
63%
8.8 (4.4, 4.4)
72%
12.8 (7.6, 5.2)
59%
13.6 (8.4, 5.2)
56%
PWM Frequency
Screen
4%
5%
2%
12%
Brightness middle
445
314.7
-29%
286
-36%
263
-41%
250
-44%
Brightness
462
312
-32%
275
-40%
264
-43%
235
-49%
Brightness Distribution
83
90
8%
90
8%
89
7%
85
2%
Black Level *
0.5
0.38
24%
0.37
26%
0.17
66%
0.29
42%
Contrast
890
828
-7%
773
-13%
1547
74%
862
-3%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.75
2.56
46%
2.19
54%
4.45
6%
1.46
69%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
7.79
4.89
37%
4.4
44%
8.33
-7%
2.47
68%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
4.49
3.4
24%
2.2
51%
4.77
-6%
1.27
72%
Gamma
2.49 88%
2.3 96%
2.41 91%
2.52 87%
2.4 92%
CCT
7374 88%
6435 101%
6405 101%
7767 84%
6749 96%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
87
60.7
-30%
59
-32%
60
-31%
60
-31%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
100
94.6
-5%
91
-9%
93
-7%
93
-7%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
1.71
2.27
1.93
Totaal Gemiddelde (Programma / Instellingen)
35% / 14%
42% / 18%
32% / 12%
37% / 20%

* ... kleiner is beter

Responstijd Scherm

De responstijden van het scherm tonen hoe snel het scherm in staat is om van één kleur naar de andere te veranderen. Trage responstijden kunnen aanleiding geven tot 'nabeelden' rond bewegende objecten of het scherm wazig maken (blur). Vooral spelers van snelle 3D-games hebben baat bij een scherm met snelle responstijden.
       Responstijd Zwart naar Wit
31 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd↗ 18 ms stijging
↘ 13 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde trage responstijden in onze tests en is misschien te traag voor games.
Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.8 (minimum) tot 240 (maximum) ms. » 78 % van alle toestellen zijn beter.
Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd slechter is dan het gemiddelde (25.3 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.
       Responstijd 50% Grijs naar 80% Grijs
51 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd↗ 24 ms stijging
↘ 27 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde trage responstijden in onze tests en is misschien te traag voor games.
Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.9 (minimum) tot 636 (maximum) ms. » 85 % van alle toestellen zijn beter.
Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd slechter is dan het gemiddelde (40.3 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Om de schermhelderheid te verlagen schakelen sommige laptops het backlight erg snel aan en uit. Dit gebeurt aan een dergelijk hoge frequentie dat het niet zichtbaar is voor het menselijk oog. Als de frequentie te laag is kunnen personen met gevoelige ogen geïrriteerd geraken, hoofdpijn krijgen en zelfs flickering waarnemen.
Screen flickering / PWM niet waargenomen

Ter vergelijking: 51 % van alle geteste toestellen maakten geen gebruik van PWM om de schermhelderheid te verlagen. Als het wel werd gebruikt, werd een gemiddelde van 9524 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz waargenomen.

 
010203040506070809010011012013014015016017018019020021022023024025026027028029030031032033034035036037038039040041042043044045046047048049050051052053054055056057058059060061062063064065066067068069070071072073074075076077078079080081082083084085086087088089090091092093094095096097098099010001010102010301040105010601070108010901100111011201130114011501160117011801190120012101220123012401250126012701280129013001310132013301340135013601370138013901400141014201430144014501460147014801490150015101520153015401550Tooltip
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657 Intel Core i9-9880H, Intel Core i9-9880H: Ø1439 (1417.84-1545.36)
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø922 (913.2-999)
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø1095 (1087.31-1156.25)
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing Intel Core i7-9700K, Intel Core i7-9700K: Ø1449 (1441.6-1465.07)
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1040 (1017.76-1182)
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing
Intel Core i7-9700K
203 Points ∼100% +4%
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657
Intel Core i9-9880H
196 Points ∼97%
Average Intel Core i9-9880H
  (183 - 197, n=5)
191 Points ∼94% -3%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
Intel Core i7-9750H
177 Points ∼87% -10%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
Intel Core i7-8750H
174 Points ∼86% -11%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Intel Core i7-8750H
166 Points ∼82% -15%
Average of class Multimedia
  (36 - 196, n=354)
127 Points ∼63% -35%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average Intel Core i9-9880H
  (1401 - 1721, n=5)
1573 Points ∼100% +2%
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657
Intel Core i9-9880H
1545 Points ∼98%
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing
Intel Core i7-9700K
1465 Points ∼93% -5%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
Intel Core i7-9750H
1182 Points ∼75% -23%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Intel Core i7-8750H
1156 Points ∼73% -25%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
Intel Core i7-8750H
999 Points ∼64% -35%
Average of class Multimedia
  (73 - 1550, n=370)
479 Points ∼30% -69%
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
196 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1545 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
130 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Help
PCMark 10
Digital Content Creation
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 9700K, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
9904 Points ∼100% +38%
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9880H, 2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ (RAID 0)
7161 Points ∼72%
Average Intel Core i9-9880H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
 
7161 Points ∼72% 0%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 9750H, 2x Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 (RAID 0)
6936 Points ∼70% -3%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
6708 Points ∼68% -6%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW010T8
6618 Points ∼67% -8%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1511 - 7161, n=85)
3683 Points ∼37% -49%
Productivity
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 9700K, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
8572 Points ∼100% +43%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 9750H, 2x Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 (RAID 0)
7661 Points ∼89% +28%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
7547 Points ∼88% +26%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW010T8
7315 Points ∼85% +22%
Average of class Multimedia
  (3113 - 8020, n=86)
6121 Points ∼71% +2%
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9880H, 2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ (RAID 0)
5986 Points ∼70%
Average Intel Core i9-9880H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
 
5986 Points ∼70% 0%
Essentials
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 9700K, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
10356 Points ∼100% +16%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 9750H, 2x Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 (RAID 0)
9231 Points ∼89% +3%
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9880H, 2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ (RAID 0)
8961 Points ∼87%
Average Intel Core i9-9880H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
 
8961 Points ∼87% 0%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW010T8
8600 Points ∼83% -4%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
8517 Points ∼82% -5%
Average of class Multimedia
  (3733 - 9360, n=86)
7387 Points ∼71% -18%
Score
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 9700K, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
6868 Points ∼100% +32%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 9750H, 2x Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 (RAID 0)
5654 Points ∼82% +9%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
5416 Points ∼79% +4%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW010T8
5353 Points ∼78% +3%
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9880H, 2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ (RAID 0)
5211 Points ∼76%
Average Intel Core i9-9880H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
 
5211 Points ∼76% 0%
Average of class Multimedia
  (2046 - 5358, n=86)
3904 Points ∼57% -25%
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 9700K, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
6258 Points ∼100% +40%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW010T8
5645 Points ∼90% +26%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
5607 Points ∼90% +25%
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9880H, 2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ (RAID 0)
4482 Points ∼72%
Average Intel Core i9-9880H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
 
4482 Points ∼72% 0%
Average of class Multimedia
  (2213 - 5651, n=270)
4278 Points ∼68% -5%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 9700K, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
5485 Points ∼100% +56%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW010T8
4338 Points ∼79% +24%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
4150 Points ∼76% +18%
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9880H, 2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ (RAID 0)
3505 Points ∼64%
Average Intel Core i9-9880H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
 
3505 Points ∼64% 0%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1740 - 4693, n=290)
3376 Points ∼62% -4%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
3505 punten
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
4482 punten
Help
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657
2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ (RAID 0)
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
2x Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 (RAID 0)
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW010T8
Average 2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ (RAID 0)
 
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
-32%
-24%
-17%
-31%
-7%
Write 4K
105.6
93.88
-11%
97.04
-8%
129.9
23%
97.13
-8%
96 (86.3 - 106, n=2)
-9%
Read 4K
46.32
40.56
-12%
49.58
7%
47.15
2%
53.66
16%
42.9 (39.5 - 46.3, n=2)
-7%
Write Seq
2910
1468
-50%
1838
-37%
1840
-37%
1526
-48%
2886 (2862 - 2910, n=2)
-1%
Read Seq
2820
1540
-45%
2421
-14%
1775
-37%
2020
-28%
2858 (2820 - 2896, n=2)
1%
Write 4K Q32T1
545
293.5
-46%
326.9
-40%
294.5
-46%
285.6
-48%
425 (305 - 545, n=2)
-22%
Read 4K Q32T1
632.2
346
-45%
372.9
-41%
373.6
-41%
321.8
-49%
491 (350 - 632, n=2)
-22%
Write Seq Q32T1
3349
1941
-42%
1894
-43%
3295
-2%
1533
-54%
3395 (3349 - 3440, n=2)
1%
Read Seq Q32T1
3333
3266
-2%
2828
-15%
3535
6%
2351
-29%
3435 (3333 - 3537, n=2)
3%
AS SSD
-4%
-24%
19%
-34%
-3%
Copy Game MB/s
1200.14
1042.83
936.25
Copy Program MB/s
525.53
452.13
362.56
Copy ISO MB/s
1974.98
2030.84
1863.91
Score Total
4411
4079
-8%
2896
-34%
5529
25%
2722
-38%
4267 (4123 - 4411, n=2)
-3%
Score Write
1762
2010
14%
1528
-13%
2590
47%
957
-46%
1660 (1558 - 1762, n=2)
-6%
Score Read
1759
1362
-23%
923
-48%
1953
11%
1180
-33%
1734 (1708 - 1759, n=2)
-1%
Access Time Write *
0.037
0.033
11%
0.04
-8%
0.028
24%
0.034
8%
0.038 (0.037 - 0.039, n=2)
-3%
Access Time Read *
0.049
0.047
4%
0.08
-63%
0.031
37%
0.114
-133%
0.052 (0.049 - 0.055, n=2)
-6%
4K-64 Write
1401.42
1717.43
23%
1253
-11%
2190.3
56%
702.74
-50%
1299 (1197 - 1401, n=2)
-7%
4K-64 Read
1428.27
1125.76
-21%
623.93
-56%
1650.96
16%
913.55
-36%
1397 (1366 - 1428, n=2)
-2%
4K Write
100.19
110.72
11%
103.6
3%
134.74
34%
107.12
7%
97.3 (94.4 - 100, n=2)
-3%
4K Read
45.15
52.31
16%
48.32
7%
27.86
-38%
55.04
22%
43 (40.9 - 45.2, n=2)
-5%
Seq Write
2603.96
1822.26
-30%
1711.53
-34%
2650.29
2%
1471.06
-44%
2636 (2604 - 2668, n=2)
1%
Seq Read
2859.65
1839.67
-36%
2505.83
-12%
2738.85
-4%
2112.83
-26%
2932 (2860 - 3005, n=2)
3%
Totaal Gemiddelde (Programma / Instellingen)
-18% / -15%
-24% / -24%
1% / 4%
-33% / -32%
-5% / -5%

* ... kleiner is beter

2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ (RAID 0)
Sequential Read: 2646 MB/s
Sequential Write: 2859 MB/s
512K Read: 1792 MB/s
512K Write: 2635 MB/s
4K Read: 63.04 MB/s
4K Write: 112.9 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 625.1 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 564.3 MB/s
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9700K
26975 Points ∼100% +29%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H
24267 Points ∼90% +16%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H
22723 Points ∼84% +9%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H
22089 Points ∼82% +6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
  (14723 - 23819, n=13)
21392 Points ∼79% +3%
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-9880H
20837 Points ∼77%
Average of class Multimedia
  (352 - 20837, n=624)
2918 Points ∼11% -86%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9700K
20759 Points ∼100% +29%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H
19123 Points ∼92% +19%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H
18153 Points ∼87% +13%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H
17598 Points ∼85% +9%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
  (11563 - 18443, n=14)
16710 Points ∼80% +4%
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-9880H
16100 Points ∼78%
Average of class Multimedia
  (337 - 16100, n=399)
2818 Points ∼14% -82%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9700K
134326 Points ∼100% +104%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H
109473 Points ∼81% +66%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H
106170 Points ∼79% +61%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
  (39014 - 112480, n=12)
87521 Points ∼65% +33%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H
73366 Points ∼55% +11%
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-9880H
65859 Points ∼49%
Average of class Multimedia
  (2468 - 77755, n=401)
16517 Points ∼12% -75%
3DMark 11 Performance
19440 punten
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
36379 punten
3DMark Fire Strike Score
14946 punten
Help
The Witcher 3
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657
Intel Core i9-9880H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
80.84 fps ∼100%
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing
Intel Core i7-9700K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop)
73 (min: 60) fps ∼90% -10%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop)
70.2 (min: 58) fps ∼87% -13%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
68.9 fps ∼85% -15%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
  (57 - 80.8, n=11)
64.3 fps ∼80% -20%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
58.3 (min: 48) fps ∼72% -28%
Average of class Multimedia
  (2.9 - 80.8, n=89)
19.4 fps ∼24% -76%
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
130.1 fps ∼100% +12%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop)
130 (min: 108) fps ∼100% +12%
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing
Intel Core i7-9700K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop)
128.4 fps ∼99% +10%
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657
Intel Core i9-9880H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
116.53 fps ∼90%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
  (86.5 - 130, n=10)
114 fps ∼88% -2%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
86.5 fps ∼66% -26%
Average of class Multimedia
  (3.8 - 117, n=99)
29 fps ∼22% -75%
1366x768 Medium Graphics & Postprocessing
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing
Intel Core i7-9700K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop)
223.1 fps ∼100% +8%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
208.9 fps ∼94% +1%
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657
Intel Core i9-9880H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
205.84 fps ∼92%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
  (145 - 209, n=9)
190 fps ∼85% -8%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
144.9 fps ∼65% -30%
Average of class Multimedia
  (5.2 - 206, n=100)
43.6 fps ∼20% -79%
1024x768 Low Graphics & Postprocessing
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing
Intel Core i7-9700K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop)
331.2 fps ∼100% +12%
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657
Intel Core i9-9880H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
295.68 fps ∼89%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
  (178 - 306, n=9)
256 fps ∼77% -13%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
252.5 fps ∼76% -15%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
177.7 fps ∼54% -40%
Average of class Multimedia
  (8.9 - 296, n=103)
63.2 fps ∼19% -79%
Thief
1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:FXAA & High SS AF:8x
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657
Intel Core i9-9880H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
99 fps ∼100%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
 
99 fps ∼100% 0%
Average of class Multimedia
  (3.2 - 99, n=86)
18.6 fps ∼19% -81%
1366x768 High Preset AA:FXAA & Low SS AF:4x
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
 
129 fps ∼100% 0%
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657
Intel Core i9-9880H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
128.7 fps ∼100%
Average of class Multimedia
  (4.8 - 129, n=102)
29.1 fps ∼23% -77%
1366x768 Normal Preset AA:FX
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
 
132 fps ∼100% 0%
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657
Intel Core i9-9880H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
131.6 fps ∼100%
Average of class Multimedia
  (6.3 - 132, n=93)
29.4 fps ∼22% -78%
1024x768 Very Low Preset
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
 
135 fps ∼100% 0%
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657
Intel Core i9-9880H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
134.8 fps ∼100%
Average of class Multimedia
  (9.2 - 135, n=90)
36.2 fps ∼27% -73%
BioShock Infinite
1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF)
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing
Intel Core i7-9700K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop)
187.8 fps ∼100% +26%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
152.5 fps ∼81% +3%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
  (116 - 211, n=11)
149 fps ∼79% 0%
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657
Intel Core i9-9880H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
148.78 fps ∼79%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
127.7 fps ∼68% -14%
Average of class Multimedia
  (3.62 - 149, n=213)
28.1 fps ∼15% -81%
1366x768 High Preset
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing
Intel Core i7-9700K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop)
320.9 fps ∼100% +16%
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657
Intel Core i9-9880H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
277.17 fps ∼86%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
246.1 fps ∼77% -11%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
  (203 - 277, n=11)
243 fps ∼76% -12%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
202.6 fps ∼63% -27%
Average of class Multimedia
  (36.3 - 277, n=249)
62.6 fps ∼20% -77%
1366x768 Medium Preset
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing
Intel Core i7-9700K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop)
346 fps ∼100% +19%
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657
Intel Core i9-9880H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
291.81 fps ∼84%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
260.1 fps ∼75% -11%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
  (218 - 292, n=11)
260 fps ∼75% -11%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
217.9 fps ∼63% -25%
Average of class Multimedia
  (43.7 - 292, n=239)
69.9 fps ∼20% -76%
1280x720 Very Low Preset
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing
Intel Core i7-9700K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop)
400.7 fps ∼100% +8%
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657
Intel Core i9-9880H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
369.72 fps ∼92%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
  (234 - 370, n=11)
298 fps ∼74% -19%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
290.8 fps ∼73% -21%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
233.9 fps ∼58% -37%
Average of class Multimedia
  (19.5 - 370, n=232)
107 fps ∼27% -71%
Dota 2 Reborn
1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657
Intel Core i9-9880H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
117.4 (min: 102.7) fps ∼100%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
  (106 - 117, n=2)
112 fps ∼95% -5%
Average of class Multimedia
  (13.9 - 117, n=30)
54.3 fps ∼46% -54%
1920x1080 high (2/3)
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657
Intel Core i9-9880H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
122.9 (min: 108.7) fps ∼100%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
  (111 - 123, n=2)
117 fps ∼95% -5%
Average of class Multimedia
  (16 - 123, n=31)
53 fps ∼43% -57%
1366x768 med (1/3)
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657
Intel Core i9-9880H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
131.4 (min: 115.6) fps ∼100%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
  (117 - 131, n=2)
124 fps ∼94% -6%
Average of class Multimedia
  (17.3 - 134, n=31)
74.3 fps ∼57% -43%
1280x720 min (0/3) fastest
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657
Intel Core i9-9880H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
142.2 (min: 126.5) fps ∼100%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
  (127 - 142, n=2)
134 fps ∼94% -6%
Average of class Multimedia
  (28.2 - 150, n=35)
85.1 fps ∼60% -40%
051015202530354045505560657075808590Tooltip
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657 GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9880H, 2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ (RAID 0): Ø76.3 (71-83)
lage gem. hoge ultra4K
BioShock Infinite (2013) 369.72291.81277.17148.78fps
Thief (2014) 134.8131.6128.799fps
The Witcher 3 (2015) 295.68205.84116.5380.8442.3fps
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 142.2131.4122.9117.4fps

Geluidsniveau

Onbelast
32.8 / 32.8 / 33.6 dB (A)
Belasting
40.9 / 42.7 dB (A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
stil
40 dB(A)
hoorbaar
50 dB(A)
luid
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm afstand)   environment noise: 30.2 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2030.533.432.629.130.52531.830.328.729.731.83129.931.332.829.729.94028.428.830.225.928.45027.327.929.725.627.3632728.529.424.1278027.226.727.622.927.210026.226.525.323.526.212526.126.325.623.426.116026.626.325.723.226.620025.52623.922.325.525024.526.323.52224.531526.43021.92126.440025.928.521.720.825.95002527.921.519.92563024.629.320.920.424.680024.527.220.12024.5100027.330.520.819.427.3125027.53020.618.727.5160028.530.320.31828.5200029.631.820.517.829.6250030.832.520.517.430.8315032.433.820.91732.4400030.532.120.616.830.5500029.630.920.916.729.6630026.928.820.516.426.9800024.726.520.316.224.71000024.125.320.216.224.11250021.422.22016.121.41600019.720.319.91619.7SPL40.942.732.830.240.9N3.33.91.71.23.3median 26.2median 28.5median 20.8median 18.7median 26.2Delta1.521.52.21.5hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseMSI P65 Creator 9SF-657
Max. Belasting
 45.7 °C49.5 °C46.8 °C 
 40.3 °C49.7 °C47.8 °C 
 31.3 °C31.3 °C34.9 °C 
Maximum: 49.7 °C
Gemiddelde: 41.9 °C
54.3 °C60.4 °C43 °C
44.4 °C47.1 °C40.6 °C
36.3 °C37.1 °C34.4 °C
Maximum: 60.4 °C
Gemiddelde: 44.2 °C
Stroomadapter (max.)  46 °C | Kamertemperatuur 22.7 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 41.9 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 30.9 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Multimedia.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 49.7 °C / 121 F, compared to the average of 36.5 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 60.4 °C / 141 F, compared to the average of 38.8 °C / 102 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.8 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 30.9 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (34.9 °C / 94.8 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 29.1 °C / 84.4 F (-5.8 °C / -10.4 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs203129.1312530.629.730.63130.729.730.74028.925.928.95027.725.627.76326.424.126.48027.622.927.610032.223.532.212534.923.434.916035.523.235.520034.622.334.625043.32243.331551.82151.840056.820.856.850057.319.957.363062.320.462.380071.52071.5100073.519.473.5125072.518.772.5160073.41873.4200077.417.877.4250069.417.469.4315072.91772.9400070.116.870.1500067.716.767.763006516.465800064.716.264.71000055.916.255.9125005216.1521600048.81648.8SPL83.530.283.5N49.71.249.7median 62.3median 18.7median 62.3Delta12.12.212.135.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6median 17.84.62.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseMSI P65 Creator 9SF-657Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77.42 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (27.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 91% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 7% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 19%, worst was 41%
Compared to all devices tested
» 81% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 15% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 8%, average was 20%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Stroomgebruik
Uit / Standbydarklight 0.9 / 1.6 Watt
Inactiefdarkmidlight 9.4 / 17.4 / 19.6 Watt
Belasting midlight 103 / 216 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657
9880H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ (RAID 0), IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 2x Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 (RAID 0), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing
9700K, GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW010T8, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
 
Average of class Multimedia
 
Power Consumption
10%
-61%
-118%
-10%
-14%
18%
Idle Minimum *
9.4
10.4
-11%
24
-155%
35
-272%
16
-70%
15.1 (9.4 - 23.5, n=11)
-61%
11.6 (2.1 - 101, n=922)
-23%
Idle Average *
17.4
14.6
16%
27
-55%
39
-124%
18
-3%
19.1 (12.3 - 28, n=11)
-10%
16.2 (4.2 - 122, n=922)
7%
Idle Maximum *
19.6
16.3
17%
33
-68%
47
-140%
23
-17%
23.6 (16.3 - 32, n=11)
-20%
19.7 (4.7 - 181, n=922)
-1%
Load Average *
103
88.5
14%
129
-25%
117
-14%
88
15%
94.6 (83.4 - 107, n=11)
8%
59.9 (18.5 - 164, n=901)
42%
Load Maximum *
216
182.4
16%
216
-0%
299
-38%
167
23%
188 (120 - 229, n=11)
13%
78 (20.1 - 329, n=906)
64%
Witcher 3 ultra *
155.4
176
196
120

* ... kleiner is beter

Batterijduur
Inactief (zonder WLAN, minimale helderheid)
9h 37min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
5h 57min
Belast (maximale helderheid)
1h 05min
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657
9880H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 82 Wh
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 80 Wh
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 76 Wh
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing
9700K, GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 82 Wh
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 94.24 Wh
Average of class Multimedia
 
Batterijduur
20%
-27%
-31%
57%
0%
Reader / Idle
577
682
18%
353
-39%
194
-66%
549
-5%
403 (73 - 2085, n=882)
-30%
WiFi v1.3
357
387
8%
220
-38%
157
-56%
382
7%
355 (96 - 942, n=238)
-1%
Load
65
88
35%
62
-5%
83
28%
174
168%
85.2 (32 - 238, n=882)
31%
H.264
154
364
350 (114 - 915, n=103)

Pro

+ hoge dekking kleurbereik
+ dunne beeldschermranden
+ laag gewicht
+ compacte behuizing
+ hoge prestaties
+ Thunderbolt 3
+ SSD RAID

Contra

- RTX 2070 Max-Q met laag TDP
- weinig onderhoudsopties
- geen kaartlezer

Verdict - compact multimedia notebook with a lot of power

Review: MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657. Test unit provided by MSI Germany.
Review: MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657. Test unit provided by MSI Germany.

Dit is de verkorte versie van het originele artikel. Het volledige, Engelse testrapport vind je hier.

Ons testrapport laat zien dat de MSI P65 Creator 9SF een compacte krachtpatser is met een levendig beeldscherm. De behuizing past perfect in zakelijke omgevingen en het vakmanschap is goed. De Thunderbolt 3 poort verzekert gebruikers ervan goed toegerust zijn voor de toekomst.

De MSI P65 Creator 9SF valt op met zijn aantrekkelijke design en fantastische prestaties. De fabrikant had misschien beter kunnen kiezen voor de versie van de nVidia GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q met een hoger TDP.

De systeemprestaties zijn goed en zijn met gemak genoeg om de meeste concurrenten bij te houden. Andere fabrikanten weten echter iets meer uit de GPU te halen - al is de P65 Creator natuurlijk uitgerust net een lagere TDP-versie van de RTX 2070 Max-Q. Net als in het vorige model zijn de onderhoudsopties zo goed als afwezig. Ons testmodel heeft ook wederom een vingerafdrukscanner die geïntegreerd is in het touchpad. Het touchpad is aanzienlijk breder dan de vorige versie en biedt ruim voldoende ruimte voor gestures.

MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657 - 03-06-2019 v6
Mike Wobker

Behuizing
84 / 98 → 86%
Toetsenbord
81%
Aanwijsapparaat
84%
Aansluitmogelijkheden
0 / 81 → 
Gewicht
64 / 20-67 → 94%
Batterij
88%
Beeldscherm
89%
Gaming-performance
99 / 85 → 100%
Applicatie-performance
90 / 92 → 98%
Temperatuur
84%
Luidheid
81 / 95 → 85%
Audio
74%
Gemiddelde
83%
89%
Multimedia - Gewogen Gemiddelde

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Overzichten en testrapporten over laptops en mobieltjes > Testrapporten > Kort testrapport MSI P65 Creator 9SF (i9-9880H, RTX2070 Max-Q) Laptop
Mike Wobker, 2019-06- 9 (Update: 2019-06- 9)