Notebookcheck

Kort testrapport Lenovo ThinkPad T490s (i5, Low Power FHD) Laptop

Andreas Osthoff, 👁 Andreas Osthoff (vertaald door Siemon Boes), 19-05-2019

Slanker, maar ook beter? Het komt een beetje als een verrassing dat de ThinkPad T490s een nieuwe behuizing heeft gekregen, aangezien de fabrikant het model vorig jaar reeds had herontworpen. Daarnaast zijn er nog andere veranderingen, maar niet allemaal positieve. We hebben de nieuwe ThinkPad T490s getest met het Low Power 1080p-scherm.

Lenovo ThinkPad T490s-20NYS02A00 (ThinkPad T490s Serie)
Processor
Intel Core i5-8265U
Grafische kaart
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Core: 1100 MHz, Geheugen: 1200 MHz
Geheugen
16384 MB 
, DDR4-2400, Dual-Channel, gesoldeerd
Beeldscherm
14 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 157 PPI, B140HAN05.7, IPS, glimmend: nee
Moederbord
Intel Cannon Lake-U PCH-LP Premium
Opslag
Intel SSD Pro 7600p SSDPEKKF512G8L, 512 GB 
Geluidskaart
Intel Cannon Lake-LP - cAVS
Verbindingen
3 USB 3.0, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, 1 Docking Station Port, Audio Verbindingen: 3.5-mm stereo-klink, Card Reader: microSD UHS-II, 1 SmartCard, 1 Vingerafdruklezer
Netwerkmogelijkheden
Intel Ethernet Connection I219-V (10/100/1000/2500/5000MBit/s), Intel Wireless-AC 9560 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.0
Afmetingen
hoogte x breedte x diepte (in mm): 16.1 x 329 x 225.8
Batterij
57 Wh Lithium-Ion
Camera
Webcam: HD
Bijkomende functionaliteiten
Luidsprekers: Stereo (2x1W), Toetsenbord: Chiclet, Toetsenbordverlichting: ja, 65W USB-C-voeding, 36 Maanden Garantie
Gewicht
1.27 kg, Voeding: 336 g
Prijs
1259 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Formaat Vergelijking

332.6 mm 234 mm 19 mm 1.6 kg331 mm 227 mm 19 mm 1.4 kg331 mm 220.9 mm 17.9 mm 1.6 kg329 mm 227 mm 18.9 mm 1.5 kg329 mm 225.8 mm 16.1 mm 1.3 kg326 mm 234 mm 17.9 mm 1.5 kg323 mm 217 mm 15 mm 1.1 kg
ThinkPad T490s (links) vs. ThinkPad T490 (rechts)
ThinkPad T490s (links) vs. ThinkPad T490 (rechts)
ThinkPad T490s (links) vs. ThinkPad T490 (right)
ThinkPad T490s (links) vs. ThinkPad T490 (rechts)
ThinkPad T490s (links) vs. ThinkPad T490 (rechts)
ThinkPad T490s (links) vs. ThinkPad T490 (rechts)
ThinkPad T490s (boven) vs. ThinkPad T490 (onder)
ThinkPad T490s (links) vs. ThinkPad T490 (rechts)
Links: USB-C 3.1 (Gen1), Thunderbolt 3, LAN, USB 3.0, HDMI 1.4b, 3.5-mm stereo-aansluiting
Links: USB-C 3.1 (Gen1), Thunderbolt 3, LAN, USB 3.0, HDMI 1.4b, 3.5-mm stereo-aansluiting
Rechts: SmartCard, USB 3.0, connector voor een beveligingsslot
Rechts: SmartCard, USB 3.0, connector voor een beveligingsslot
Achter: Kaartlezer voor microSD en Nano-SIM
Achter: Kaartlezer voor microSD en Nano-SIM
SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Dell Latitude 7490
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 UHS-II)
137.6 MB/s ∼100% +101%
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L7002AUS
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
81.08 MB/s ∼59% +19%
Fujitsu LifeBook U748
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
72.8 MB/s ∼53% +7%
Lenovo ThinkPad T490s-20NYS02A00
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
68.3 MB/s ∼50%
Average of class Office
  (10.2 - 191, n=273)
62.4 MB/s ∼45% -9%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Dell Latitude 7490
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 UHS-II)
203.2 MB/s ∼100% +131%
Lenovo ThinkPad T490s-20NYS02A00
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
87.8 MB/s ∼43%
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L7002AUS
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
87.32 MB/s ∼43% -1%
Fujitsu LifeBook U748
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
82.7 MB/s ∼41% -6%
Average of class Office
  (9.5 - 255, n=248)
79 MB/s ∼39% -10%
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Dell Latitude 7490
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
650 MBit/s ∼100% 0%
Lenovo ThinkPad T490s-20NYS02A00
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
648 MBit/s ∼100%
HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX66EA
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
644 MBit/s ∼99% -1%
Fujitsu LifeBook U748
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
624 MBit/s ∼96% -4%
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L7002AUS
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
620 MBit/s ∼95% -4%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G6-20KG0025UK
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
540 MBit/s ∼83% -17%
Average of class Office
  (5 - 688, n=220)
467 MBit/s ∼72% -28%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Lenovo ThinkPad T490s-20NYS02A00
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
667 MBit/s ∼100%
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L7002AUS
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
529 MBit/s ∼79% -21%
HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX66EA
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
523 MBit/s ∼78% -22%
Dell Latitude 7490
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
513 MBit/s ∼77% -23%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G6-20KG0025UK
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
494 MBit/s ∼74% -26%
Fujitsu LifeBook U748
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
455 MBit/s ∼68% -32%
Average of class Office
  (34 - 688, n=220)
443 MBit/s ∼66% -34%
414
cd/m²
402
cd/m²
390
cd/m²
377
cd/m²
391
cd/m²
362
cd/m²
396
cd/m²
394
cd/m²
379
cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling
B140HAN05.7
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 414 cd/m² Gemiddelde: 389.4 cd/m² Minimum: 6 cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling: 87 %
Helderheid in Batterij-modus: 391 cd/m²
Contrast: 1700:1 (Zwart: 0.23 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.4 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6, calibrated: 1.1
ΔE Greyscale 4 | 0.64-98 Ø6.3
97.4% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 62.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.49
Lenovo ThinkPad T490s-20NYS02A00
B140HAN05.7, , 1920x1080, 14
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L7002AUS
NV140FHM-N46, , 1920x1080, 14
Lenovo ThinkPad T490-20N3S02L00
NE140FHM-N61, , 1920x1080, 14
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G6-20KG0025UK
Lenovo LEN40A9 / AUO B140HAK02.3, , 1920x1080, 14
Fujitsu LifeBook U748
LG, LP140WF6-SPF1, , 1920x1080, 14
HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX66EA
AUO3B3D, , 1920x1080, 14
Dell Latitude 7490
AUO503D (D04YD_B140HAN), , 1920x1080, 14
Response Times
21%
-19%
36%
37%
25%
25%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
61.6 (30.8, 30.8)
44 (26, 18)
29%
74 (33.6, 40.4)
-20%
40 (18, 22)
35%
39.2 (20.4, 18.8)
36%
42.4 (19.6, 22.8)
31%
41.6 (22, 19.6)
32%
Response Time Black / White *
38.8 (21.2, 17.6)
34 (18.8, 15.2)
12%
45.6 (22.8, 22.8)
-18%
25 (14, 11)
36%
24.4 (12.8, 11.6)
37%
31.6 (18, 13.6)
19%
32 (16.4, 15.6)
18%
PWM Frequency
990.1
2451 (50)
Screen
-82%
-24%
-0%
-12%
-33%
-37%
Brightness middle
391
288.3
-26%
418
7%
298
-24%
334
-15%
414
6%
308.6
-21%
Brightness
389
281
-28%
400
3%
287
-26%
313
-20%
387
-1%
294
-24%
Brightness Distribution
87
86
-1%
88
1%
91
5%
89
2%
87
0%
89
2%
Black Level *
0.23
0.21
9%
0.24
-4%
0.2
13%
0.41
-78%
0.25
-9%
0.23
-0%
Contrast
1700
1373
-19%
1742
2%
1490
-12%
815
-52%
1656
-3%
1342
-21%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
3.4
6.16
-81%
4.7
-38%
2.19
36%
2.2
35%
5.5
-62%
6.07
-79%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
4.7
18.99
-304%
8.7
-85%
4.39
7%
5.7
-21%
9.9
-111%
10.58
-125%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
1.1
4.51
-310%
2.1
-91%
1.67
-52%
2.3
-109%
1.67
-52%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
4
6.3
-58%
5.9
-48%
1.97
51%
2.9
27%
6.4
-60%
7.3
-83%
Gamma
2.49 88%
2.517 87%
2.06 107%
2.43 91%
2.34 94%
2.31 95%
2.061 107%
CCT
6809 95%
6886 94%
7350 88%
6571 99%
6855 95%
7811 83%
7269 89%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
62.4
37.67
-40%
59.9
-4%
62
-1%
65.3
5%
56.9
-9%
62
-1%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
97.4
58.9
-40%
92.1
-5%
95
-2%
91.8
-6%
88.1
-10%
97
0%
Totaal Gemiddelde (Programma / Instellingen)
-31% / -66%
-22% / -23%
18% / 5%
13% / -4%
-4% / -24%
-6% / -27%

* ... kleiner is beter

Responstijd Scherm

De responstijden van het scherm tonen hoe snel het scherm in staat is om van één kleur naar de andere te veranderen. Trage responstijden kunnen aanleiding geven tot 'nabeelden' rond bewegende objecten of het scherm wazig maken (blur). Vooral spelers van snelle 3D-games hebben baat bij een scherm met snelle responstijden.
       Responstijd Zwart naar Wit
38.8 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd↗ 21.2 ms stijging
↘ 17.6 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde trage responstijden in onze tests en is misschien te traag voor games.
Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.8 (minimum) tot 240 (maximum) ms. » 96 % van alle toestellen zijn beter.
Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd slechter is dan het gemiddelde (25 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.
       Responstijd 50% Grijs naar 80% Grijs
61.6 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd↗ 30.8 ms stijging
↘ 30.8 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde trage responstijden in onze tests en is misschien te traag voor games.
Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.9 (minimum) tot 636 (maximum) ms. » 96 % van alle toestellen zijn beter.
Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd slechter is dan het gemiddelde (39.8 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Om de schermhelderheid te verlagen schakelen sommige laptops het backlight erg snel aan en uit. Dit gebeurt aan een dergelijk hoge frequentie dat het niet zichtbaar is voor het menselijk oog. Als de frequentie te laag is kunnen personen met gevoelige ogen geïrriteerd geraken, hoofdpijn krijgen en zelfs flickering waarnemen.
Screen flickering / PWM niet waargenomen

Ter vergelijking: 51 % van alle geteste toestellen maakten geen gebruik van PWM om de schermhelderheid te verlagen. Als het wel werd gebruikt, werd een gemiddelde van 9418 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz waargenomen.

 
 
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700710Tooltip
Lenovo ThinkPad T490s-20NYS02A00 Intel Core i5-8265U, Intel Core i5-8265U: Ø584 (566.02-686.12)
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L7002AUS Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel Core i5-8250U: Ø672 (635.4-707.09)
Fujitsu LifeBook U748 Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel Core i5-8250U: Ø508 (501.47-546.37)
HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX66EA Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel Core i5-8250U: Ø510 (500.33-582.81)
Dell Latitude 7490 Intel Core i5-8350U, Intel Core i5-8350U: Ø531 (519.92-595.49)
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900 Intel Core i7-8550U, Intel Core i7-8550U; undervolted: Ø657 (651.36-692.5)
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900 Intel Core i7-8550U, Intel Core i7-8550U: Ø606 (601.59-638.02)
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Lenovo ThinkPad T490s-20NYS02A00
Intel Core i5-8265U
162 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i5-8265U
  (111 - 164, n=26)
154 Points ∼95% -5%
Dell Latitude 7490
Intel Core i5-8350U
153 Points ∼94% -6%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G6-20KG0025UK
Intel Core i5-8350U
150 Points ∼93% -7%
Fujitsu LifeBook U748
Intel Core i5-8250U
144 Points ∼89% -11%
HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX66EA
Intel Core i5-8250U
143 Points ∼88% -12%
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L7002AUS
Intel Core i5-8250U
143 Points ∼88% -12%
Average of class Office
  (20 - 199, n=530)
112 Points ∼69% -31%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L7002AUS
Intel Core i5-8250U
716 Points ∼100% +4%
Lenovo ThinkPad T490s-20NYS02A00
Intel Core i5-8265U
686 (min: 566.02, max: 686.12) Points ∼96%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G6-20KG0025UK
Intel Core i5-8350U
631 Points ∼88% -8%
Average Intel Core i5-8265U
  (457 - 750, n=28)
598 Points ∼84% -13%
HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX66EA
Intel Core i5-8250U
583 Points ∼81% -15%
Dell Latitude 7490
Intel Core i5-8350U
569 Points ∼79% -17%
Fujitsu LifeBook U748
Intel Core i5-8250U
553 Points ∼77% -19%
Average of class Office
  (36 - 1050, n=538)
343 Points ∼48% -50%
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
686 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
56.8 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
98 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
162 Points
Help
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700710720730740750Tooltip
Lenovo ThinkPad T490s-20NYS02A00 Intel Core i5-8265U, Intel Core i5-8265U: Ø584 (566.02-686.12)
Lenovo ThinkPad T490s-20NYS02A00 Intel Core i5-8265U, Intel Core i5-8265U; Undervolting: Ø639 (620.19-749.93)
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02D00 Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel Core i5-8250U: Ø705 (655.21-720.75)
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02D00 Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel Core i5-8250U; undervolted: Ø708 (702.84-711.63)
PCMark 10
Digital Content Creation
Lenovo ThinkPad T490s-20NYS02A00
UHD Graphics 620, 8265U, Intel SSD Pro 7600p SSDPEKKF512G8L
3210 Points ∼100%
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L7002AUS
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
3082 Points ∼96% -4%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G6-20KG0025UK
UHD Graphics 620, 8350U, Lenovo LENSE20256GMSP34MEAT2TA
3024 Points ∼94% -6%
Average Intel Core i5-8265U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (2620 - 3210, n=21)
2977 Points ∼93% -7%
Dell Latitude 7490
UHD Graphics 620, 8350U, Toshiba KSG60ZMV256G
2911 Points ∼91% -9%
HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX66EA
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G
2807 Points ∼87% -13%
Fujitsu LifeBook U748
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
2761 Points ∼86% -14%
Average of class Office
  (320 - 3884, n=146)
2644 Points ∼82% -18%
Productivity
Lenovo ThinkPad T490s-20NYS02A00
UHD Graphics 620, 8265U, Intel SSD Pro 7600p SSDPEKKF512G8L
6441 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i5-8265U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (5636 - 6556, n=21)
6180 Points ∼96% -4%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G6-20KG0025UK
UHD Graphics 620, 8350U, Lenovo LENSE20256GMSP34MEAT2TA
6140 Points ∼95% -5%
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L7002AUS
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
6053 Points ∼94% -6%
HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX66EA
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G
5844 Points ∼91% -9%
Dell Latitude 7490
UHD Graphics 620, 8350U, Toshiba KSG60ZMV256G
5721 Points ∼89% -11%
Fujitsu LifeBook U748
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
5548 Points ∼86% -14%
Average of class Office
  (1266 - 7964, n=146)
5474 Points ∼85% -15%
Essentials
Lenovo ThinkPad T490s-20NYS02A00
UHD Graphics 620, 8265U, Intel SSD Pro 7600p SSDPEKKF512G8L
8361 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i5-8265U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (7278 - 8689, n=21)
7902 Points ∼95% -5%
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L7002AUS
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
7805 Points ∼93% -7%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G6-20KG0025UK
UHD Graphics 620, 8350U, Lenovo LENSE20256GMSP34MEAT2TA
7799 Points ∼93% -7%
Dell Latitude 7490
UHD Graphics 620, 8350U, Toshiba KSG60ZMV256G
7376 Points ∼88% -12%
HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX66EA
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G
7139 Points ∼85% -15%
Fujitsu LifeBook U748
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
7099 Points ∼85% -15%
Average of class Office
  (2683 - 9790, n=146)
6953 Points ∼83% -17%
Score
Lenovo ThinkPad T490s-20NYS02A00
UHD Graphics 620, 8265U, Intel SSD Pro 7600p SSDPEKKF512G8L
3985 Points ∼100%
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L7002AUS
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
3771 Points ∼95% -5%
Average Intel Core i5-8265U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (3573 - 3985, n=21)
3767 Points ∼95% -5%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G6-20KG0025UK
UHD Graphics 620, 8350U, Lenovo LENSE20256GMSP34MEAT2TA
3764 Points ∼94% -6%
Dell Latitude 7490
UHD Graphics 620, 8350U, Toshiba KSG60ZMV256G
3564 Points ∼89% -11%
Average of class Office
  (803 - 4597, n=147)
3260 Points ∼82% -18%
HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX66EA
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G
2429 Points ∼61% -39%
Fujitsu LifeBook U748
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
2364 Points ∼59% -41%
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Lenovo ThinkPad T490s-20NYS02A00
UHD Graphics 620, 8265U, Intel SSD Pro 7600p SSDPEKKF512G8L
4927 Points ∼100%
Dell Latitude 7490
UHD Graphics 620, 8350U, Toshiba KSG60ZMV256G
4906 Points ∼100% 0%
HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX66EA
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G
4832 Points ∼98% -2%
Average Intel Core i5-8265U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (4302 - 4927, n=18)
4744 Points ∼96% -4%
Fujitsu LifeBook U748
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
4684 Points ∼95% -5%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G6-20KG0025UK
UHD Graphics 620, 8350U, Lenovo LENSE20256GMSP34MEAT2TA
4600 Points ∼93% -7%
Average of class Office
  (1226 - 5428, n=344)
4019 Points ∼82% -18%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Lenovo ThinkPad T490s-20NYS02A00
UHD Graphics 620, 8265U, Intel SSD Pro 7600p SSDPEKKF512G8L
4244 Points ∼100%
Dell Latitude 7490
UHD Graphics 620, 8350U, Toshiba KSG60ZMV256G
3723 Points ∼88% -12%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G6-20KG0025UK
UHD Graphics 620, 8350U, Lenovo LENSE20256GMSP34MEAT2TA
3690 Points ∼87% -13%
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L7002AUS
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
3672 Points ∼87% -13%
HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX66EA
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G
3652 Points ∼86% -14%
Fujitsu LifeBook U748
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
3542 Points ∼83% -17%
Average Intel Core i5-8265U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (3150 - 4244, n=19)
3503 Points ∼83% -17%
Average of class Office
  (1169 - 4770, n=403)
3056 Points ∼72% -28%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
4244 punten
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
5323 punten
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
4927 punten
Help
Lenovo ThinkPad T490s-20NYS02A00
Intel SSD Pro 7600p SSDPEKKF512G8L
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L7002AUS
Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G6-20KG0025UK
Lenovo LENSE20256GMSP34MEAT2TA
Fujitsu LifeBook U748
Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX66EA
Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G
Dell Latitude 7490
Toshiba KSG60ZMV256G
Average Intel SSD Pro 7600p SSDPEKKF512G8L
 
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
-15%
-15%
18%
-27%
-56%
8%
Write 4K
122.03
105.8
-13%
116.4
-5%
135.5
11%
92.75
-24%
79.41
-35%
129 (121 - 144, n=4)
6%
Read 4K
45.56
40.79
-10%
45.75
0%
43.76
-4%
30.67
-33%
27.37
-40%
57.3 (45.6 - 63.5, n=4)
26%
Write Seq
1497.34
1204
-20%
455.1
-70%
1006
-33%
353.2
-76%
343.9
-77%
1332 (846 - 1497, n=4)
-11%
Read Seq
2385.23
1065
-55%
1818
-24%
1761
-26%
1937
-19%
472.7
-80%
2312 (1425 - 2760, n=4)
-3%
Write 4K Q32T1
240.94
219.2
-9%
248.9
3%
659.7
174%
358
49%
206
-15%
335 (238 - 503, n=4)
39%
Read 4K Q32T1
338.03
304.3
-10%
358
6%
432.6
28%
253.1
-25%
188.3
-44%
394 (336 - 482, n=4)
17%
Write Seq Q32T1
1528.4
1267
-17%
1191
-22%
1231
-19%
359.6
-76%
343.3
-78%
1497 (1391 - 1558, n=4)
-2%
Read Seq Q32T1
2915
3303
13%
2755
-5%
3220
10%
2613
-10%
532.6
-82%
2665 (1570 - 3154, n=4)
-9%
AS SSD
-12%
-80%
-13%
-128%
-81%
-1%
Copy Game MB/s
548.82
309.25
827 (646 - 1147, n=3)
Copy Program MB/s
210.91
168.2
433 (418 - 445, n=3)
Copy ISO MB/s
732.8
319.17
1393 (1164 - 1725, n=3)
Score Total
2831
3048
8%
1443
-49%
2833
0%
1232
-56%
947
-67%
2760 (2400 - 3095, n=4)
-3%
Score Write
1226
921
-25%
405
-67%
741
-40%
376
-69%
357
-71%
1148 (920 - 1328, n=4)
-6%
Score Read
1092
1435
31%
718
-34%
1405
29%
603
-45%
391
-64%
1090 (858 - 1213, n=4)
0%
Access Time Write *
0.039
0.038
3%
0.144
-269%
0.025
36%
0.053
-36%
0.056
-44%
0.0273 (0.021 - 0.039, n=4)
30%
Access Time Read *
0.033
0.055
-67%
0.108
-227%
0.052
-58%
0.321
-873%
0.112
-239%
0.0325 (0.025 - 0.037, n=4)
2%
4K-64 Write
927.31
706.33
-24%
195.84
-79%
515.79
-44%
248.31
-73%
248.06
-73%
867 (594 - 1041, n=4)
-7%
4K-64 Read
760.86
1183.23
56%
446.09
-41%
1202.89
58%
413.33
-46%
316.06
-58%
796 (685 - 873, n=4)
5%
4K Write
164.45
97.85
-40%
87.56
-47%
144.29
-12%
93.56
-43%
79.15
-52%
154 (137 - 175, n=4)
-6%
4K Read
65.58
42.09
-36%
35.67
-46%
45.42
-31%
29.01
-56%
26.66
-59%
60.5 (46.4 - 66.3, n=4)
-8%
Seq Write
1341
1172.23
-13%
1219.53
-9%
804.5
-40%
338.97
-75%
294.93
-78%
1262 (735 - 1511, n=4)
-6%
Seq Read
2654
2093.95
-21%
2364.51
-11%
1569.48
-41%
1610.71
-39%
486.16
-82%
2337 (1262 - 2742, n=4)
-12%
Totaal Gemiddelde (Programma / Instellingen)
-14% / -13%
-48% / -52%
3% / -0%
-78% / -86%
-69% / -70%
4% / 3%

* ... kleiner is beter

Intel SSD Pro 7600p SSDPEKKF512G8L
Sequential Read: 2635.9 MB/s
Sequential Write: 1492 MB/s
512K Read: 1501.2 MB/s
512K Write: 1018.78 MB/s
4K Read: 59.88 MB/s
4K Write: 125.75 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 343.21 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 249.63 MB/s
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Lenovo ThinkPad E485-20KU000NGE
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8, AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
3756 Points ∼100% +104%
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02E00
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, Intel Core i7-8550U
3551 Points ∼95% +93%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G6-20KG0025UK
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8350U
1868 Points ∼50% +2%
Lenovo ThinkPad T490s-20NYS02A00
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8265U
1839 Points ∼49%
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (1235 - 2006, n=165)
1716 Points ∼46% -7%
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L7002AUS
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8250U
1704 Points ∼45% -7%
HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX66EA
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8250U
1653 Points ∼44% -10%
Dell Latitude 7490
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8350U
1648 Points ∼44% -10%
Fujitsu LifeBook U748
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8250U
1593 Points ∼42% -13%
Average of class Office
  (185 - 5332, n=652)
1308 Points ∼35% -29%
3DMark
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Lenovo ThinkPad E485-20KU000NGE
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8, AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
742 Points ∼100%
Average of class Office
  (76 - 1158, n=49)
476 Points ∼64%
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (299 - 431, n=29)
356 Points ∼48%
Fujitsu LifeBook U748
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8250U
322 Points ∼43%
HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX66EA
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8250U
317 Points ∼43%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02E00
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, Intel Core i7-8550U
2807 Points ∼100% +110%
Lenovo ThinkPad E485-20KU000NGE
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8, AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
2429 Points ∼87% +82%
Lenovo ThinkPad T490s-20NYS02A00
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8265U
1336 Points ∼48%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G6-20KG0025UK
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8350U
1283 Points ∼46% -4%
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (557 - 1401, n=134)
1127 Points ∼40% -16%
HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX66EA
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8250U
1009 Points ∼36% -24%
Average of class Office
  (138 - 4109, n=471)
1007 Points ∼36% -25%
Dell Latitude 7490
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8350U
1001 Points ∼36% -25%
Fujitsu LifeBook U748
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8250U
994 Points ∼35% -26%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02E00
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, Intel Core i7-8550U
17743 Points ∼100% +63%
Lenovo ThinkPad E485-20KU000NGE
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8, AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
16111 Points ∼91% +48%
Lenovo ThinkPad T490s-20NYS02A00
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8265U
10881 Points ∼61%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G6-20KG0025UK
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8350U
10234 Points ∼58% -6%
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (6910 - 11436, n=152)
9153 Points ∼52% -16%
HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX66EA
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8250U
8181 Points ∼46% -25%
Fujitsu LifeBook U748
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8250U
8138 Points ∼46% -25%
Dell Latitude 7490
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8350U
7943 Points ∼45% -27%
Average of class Office
  (1208 - 27117, n=517)
6975 Points ∼39% -36%
3DMark 11 Performance
2079 punten
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
10155 punten
3DMark Fire Strike Score
1217 punten
Help
lage gem. hoge ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 58.735.330.510.3fps
The Witcher 3 (2015) 17fps
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 8653.32219.5fps
Rocket League (2017) 90.537.524.7fps
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 31.119.317.4fps

Geluidsniveau

Onbelast
29.4 / 29.4 / 30.9 dB (A)
Belasting
33.3 / 33.3 dB (A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
stil
40 dB(A)
hoorbaar
50 dB(A)
luid
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm afstand)   environment noise: 29.4 dB(A)
Lenovo ThinkPad T490s-20NYS02A00
UHD Graphics 620, 8265U, Intel SSD Pro 7600p SSDPEKKF512G8L
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L7002AUS
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G6-20KG0025UK
UHD Graphics 620, 8350U, Lenovo LENSE20256GMSP34MEAT2TA
Fujitsu LifeBook U748
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX66EA
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G
Dell Latitude 7490
UHD Graphics 620, 8350U, Toshiba KSG60ZMV256G
Noise
-2%
1%
-1%
-2%
1%
off / environment *
29.4
28.1
4%
30.25
-3%
29.3
-0%
28.8
2%
28.2
4%
Idle Minimum *
29.4
28.1
4%
30.25
-3%
29.3
-0%
28.8
2%
28.2
4%
Idle Average *
29.4
28.1
4%
30.25
-3%
29.3
-0%
28.8
2%
28.2
4%
Idle Maximum *
30.9
28.1
9%
30.25
2%
29.9
3%
33.1
-7%
28.7
7%
Load Average *
33.3
35.5
-7%
31.3
6%
32.5
2%
35.2
-6%
29.9
10%
Load Maximum *
33.3
41.5
-25%
31.3
6%
36.6
-10%
35.2
-6%
40.2
-21%

* ... kleiner is beter

Max. Belasting
 31.8 °C42.9 °C42.4 °C 
 31.6 °C43.3 °C42.1 °C 
 24.6 °C27.4 °C27.8 °C 
Maximum: 43.3 °C
Gemiddelde: 34.9 °C
41.2 °C45.1 °C34.6 °C
38.1 °C41.2 °C30.8 °C
27.4 °C28 °C26.5 °C
Maximum: 45.1 °C
Gemiddelde: 34.8 °C
Stroomadapter (max.)  32.3 °C | Kamertemperatuur 19.3 °C | Voltcraft IR-900
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 34.9 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 29.4 °C / 85 F for the devices in the class Office.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.3 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45.1 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 36.4 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.4 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 29.4 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 27.8 °C / 82 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.1 °C / 82.6 F (+0.3 °C / 0.6 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2030.331.72524.629.73128.330.54027.526.75025.125.56325.226.18023.125.410022.926.212521.726.116022.130.62002237.625021.340.63152146.640020.650.850020.255.363019.457.580018.961.5100018.360.1125017.959.3160017.160.1200016.760.6250016.261.2315016.158.6400015.850.1500015.652.3630015.453.7800015.5541000015.453.71250015.244.11600014.839.8SPL29.470.2N1.225.3median 17.9median 53.7Delta2.59.330.131.329.430.330.229.929.331.431.632.5262725.526.626.729.525.529.624.438.622.848.922.351.719.656.918.563.717.665.717.167.216.266.616.371.115.973.715.472.715.572.415.572.715.872.516.175.616.67916.877.417.271.317.471.817.467.217.35628.885.81.264.1median 17.2median 67.21.89.536.241.636.234.73734.734.633.634.634.434.234.433.233.533.23234.13232.233.932.240.130.440.144.229.244.247.729.447.749.427.649.454.227.454.256.226.856.256.725.856.757.425.757.459.925.159.964.824.564.868.324.468.362.724.262.767246766.923.966.968.924.168.964.42464.458.623.858.665.223.665.263.823.563.866.223.566.265.323.465.357.723.457.762.223.562.277.336.377.340.52.740.5median 62.2median 24.2median 62.25.81.45.8hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseLenovo ThinkPad T490s-20NYS02A00HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX66EADell Latitude 7490
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Lenovo ThinkPad T490s-20NYS02A00 audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (70.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 74% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 20% worse
» The best had a delta of 8%, average was 21%, worst was 51%
Compared to all devices tested
» 66% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX66EA audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 46% of all tested devices in this class were better, 13% similar, 41% worse
» The best had a delta of 8%, average was 21%, worst was 51%
Compared to all devices tested
» 45% of all tested devices were better, 9% similar, 46% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Dell Latitude 7490 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77.31 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 18% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 78% worse
» The best had a delta of 8%, average was 21%, worst was 51%
Compared to all devices tested
» 20% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 75% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Stroomgebruik
Uit / Standbydarklight 0.27 / 0.58 Watt
Inactiefdarkmidlight 2.62 / 5.16 / 8.7 Watt
Belasting midlight 40 / 64 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Lenovo ThinkPad T490s-20NYS02A00
8265U, UHD Graphics 620, Intel SSD Pro 7600p SSDPEKKF512G8L, IPS, 1920x1080, 14
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L7002AUS
8250U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, TFT-LCD, 1920x1080, 14
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G6-20KG0025UK
8350U, UHD Graphics 620, Lenovo LENSE20256GMSP34MEAT2TA, IPS, 1920x1080, 14
Fujitsu LifeBook U748
8250U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 14
HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX66EA
8250U, UHD Graphics 620, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G, IPS, 1920x1080, 14
Dell Latitude 7490
8350U, UHD Graphics 620, Toshiba KSG60ZMV256G, IPS, 1920x1080, 14
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620
 
Average of class Office
 
Power Consumption
5%
-8%
1%
-11%
22%
Idle Minimum *
2.62
3.1
-18%
4.7
-79%
3.33
-27%
3.2
-22%
2
24%
Idle Average *
5.16
6.4
-24%
7.3
-41%
6.9
-34%
6.6
-28%
4.7
9%
Idle Maximum *
8.7
9.4
-8%
9.4
-8%
8.2
6%
9.5
-9%
5.7
34%
Load Average *
40
29.8
25%
28
30%
29.4
26%
36.2
9%
38.4
4%
Load Maximum *
64
31.2
51%
28.2
56%
43.4
32%
65.6
-3%
38.9
39%

* ... kleiner is beter

Batterijduur
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
10h 07min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
13h 54min
Belast (maximale helderheid)
1h 39min
Lenovo ThinkPad T490s-20NYS02A00
8265U, UHD Graphics 620, 57 Wh
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L7002AUS
8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 57 Wh
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G6-20KG0025UK
8350U, UHD Graphics 620, 57 Wh
Fujitsu LifeBook U748
8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 50 Wh
HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX66EA
8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 50 Wh
Dell Latitude 7490
8350U, UHD Graphics 620, 60 Wh
Average of class Office
 
Batterijduur
-11%
-2%
-27%
-7%
-10%
-32%
Reader / Idle
1468
937
1138
H.264
834
657
-21%
397
-52%
399
-52%
WiFi v1.3
607
541
-11%
621
2%
390
-36%
447
-26%
548
-10%
415 (105 - 964, n=349)
-32%
Load
99
111
12%
106
7%
156
58%

Pro

+ stevige en hoogwaardige behuizing
+ erg goed 1080p-scherm (ontspiegeld, helder, bijna volledige sRGB-kleurenruimte)
+ lange batterijduur
+ uitstekend toetsenbord
+ stil in gebruik
+ uitstekende systeemprestaties
+ WWAN mogelijk
+ 3 jaar garantie

Contra

- weinig onderhoudsvriendelijk (RAM, Wi-Fi, toetsenbord)
- koeling veel slechter dan bij T480s
- geen discrete GPU meer
- slechtere CPU-prestaties dan voorganger
- paneel met trage responstijden
- microSD-lezer met onhandige positie
- ventilator schiet snel in actie
Getest: Lenovo ThinkPad T490s. Testmodel voorzien door
Getest: Lenovo ThinkPad T490s. Testmodel voorzien door

Dit is de verkorte versie van het originele artikel. Het volledige, Engelse testrapport vind je hier.

We kunnen het deze keer kort houden: de ThinkPad T490s is een uitstekende business-laptop en een van de beste totaalpakketten met het nieuwe scherm. De Campus-versie voor slechts 1259 euro is ook een echt koopje.

We zouden de conclusie hiermee kunnen afronden, maar het is wat complexer als je de vergelijking maakt tussen de ThinkPad T490 en zijn voorganger en Lenovo's overige 14-inch-laptops. Als je het huidige portfolio van hoogwaardige zakelijke toestellen beschouwt, wordt het snel duidelijk dat alle series meer op elkaar lijken dan ooit. Daarmee bedoelen we ook de T490, de T490s, de X1 Carbon en de nieuwe X390, die zelfs zijn moederbord deelt met de T490s. Er zijn uiteraard ook enkele verschillen, maar kopers krijgen vier praktisch identieke systemen als je voor een gelijkaardige configuratie kiest - en dan hebben we het nog niet gehad over de concurrerende toestellen van andere fabrikanten.

In het verleden was het T4X0s-model gewoonlijk een slankere versie van de gewone T4x0 en uitgerust met betere componenten om niet te moeten inboeten aan prestaties. Dit verandert met de nieuwe T490s. Ja, de nieuwe behuizing is geslaagd en de kwaliteit is een stukje beter dan die van de gewone T490, maar de T490s doet het slechter op het vlak van prestaties. Dan hebben we het uiteraard over de grafische kaart, aangezien er geen discrete GPU meer is, maar ook de processor. Deze laatste heeft te leiden onder een minder krachtige koeling, waardoor de voorgangers zelfs wat sneller is.

De ThinkPad T490s is volgens ons min of meer een goedkopere X1 Carbon (of X1 Carbon Lite). Hij is wat groter en zwaarder, maar biedt vergelijkbare prestaties en een identiek toetsenbord-design. De kwaliteit van het toetsenbord is trouwens van hetzelfde niveau als de duurdere X1 Carbon en dus beter dan de T490 en de concurrenten van Dell, Fujitsu en HP. De locatie van de poorten van de T490s doet ons denken aan de X1 Carbon, inclusief de ontoegankelijke microSD-lezer.

We waarderen de extra opties voor het scherm en hebben het ontspiegelde Low Power 1080p-scherm getest. Dit paneel maakte afgezien van de trage responstijden een uitstekende indruk. We verwachten dat dit de populairste optie zal worden voor zowel de T490s als de gewone T490. De helderheid is erg goed, de beeldkwaliteit wordt merkbaar verbeterd door het hoge contrast en het beeld ziet er niet korrelig uit, ondanks het ontspiegelde oppervlak. Het paneel dekt ook de kleinere sRGB-kleurenruimte en de kleurafwijkingen zijn erg laag, zeker na kalibratie. Dit betekent dat het scherm geschikt is voor beeldbewerking - de T490s was een nog interessantere optie geweest voor fotografen als hij zou beschikken over een SD-lezer van normaal formaat. 

Dunnere behuizing, beter scherm, beter toetsenbord, langere batterijduur - lagere CPU-prestaties, geen discrete GPU, beperkte poorten en minder onderhoudsvriendelijk. Afhankelijk van je verwachtingen zal de nieuwe T490 ofwel geweldig ofwel een grote teleurstelling zijn.

De T490s is beter dan zijn concurrenten, aangezien het een uiterst compleet totaalpakket biedt in het marktsegment van de kantoor/business-laptops. Er zijn een aantal nadelen, maar sommige daarvan blijken alleen als je de vergelijking maakt met de voorganger. De andere concurrenten zijn immers evenmin perfect. Daarom geven we de T490s onze Editor's Choice Award. De concurrentie zal in de komende weken hun aanbod ook een update geven, waardoor de Top 10 snel door elkaar zou kunnen worden geschud.

Lenovo ThinkPad T490s-20NYS02A00 - 15-05-2019 v6(old)
Andreas Osthoff

Behuizing
91 / 98 → 93%
Toetsenbord
95%
Aanwijsapparaat
91%
Aansluitmogelijkheden
74 / 80 → 93%
Gewicht
72 / 20-67 → 100%
Batterij
94%
Beeldscherm
91%
Gaming-performance
60 / 68 → 88%
Applicatie-performance
89 / 92 → 97%
Temperatuur
91%
Luidheid
91%
Audio
68%
Camera
50 / 85 → 59%
Gemiddelde
81%
92%
Office - Gewogen Gemiddelde

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Overzichten en testrapporten over laptops en mobieltjes > Testrapporten > Kort testrapport Lenovo ThinkPad T490s (i5, Low Power FHD) Laptop
Andreas Osthoff, 2019-05-19 (Update: 2019-05-19)