Notebookcheck

Kort testrapport LG Q7 Plus Smartphone

Mike Wobker, 02-08-2018

Camera AI "QLens" Het topmodel van LG in de Q7-lijn belooft gebruikers bovengemiddelde prestaties, en het nieuwe apparaat biedt de QLens AI-technologie die anders te vinden is in LG's premium smartphones. Maar wat krijgen kopers van de LG Q7 Plus echt voor hun €400? Lees dit artikel om erachter te komen.

LG Q7 Plus (Q Serie)
Processor
Mediatek MT6750S
Grafische kaart
ARM Mali-T860 MP2
Geheugen
4096 MB 
Beeldscherm
5.5 inch 2:1, 2160 x 1080 pixel 439 PPI, capacitief, IPS, glimmend: ja
Opslag
64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 GB 
, 50 GB beschikbaar
Verbindingen
1 USB 2.0, Audio Verbindingen: 3.5mm poort, Card Reader: microSD (tot 2TB), 1 Vingerafdruklezer, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensoren: versnellingsmeter, nabijheidssensor, digitaal kompas, gyroscoop
Netwerkmogelijkheden
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n), Bluetooth 4.2, GSM (900/1800), 3G WCDMA (B1/B2), LTE (B1, B3, B7, B8, B20, B28, B38), LTE, GPS
Afmetingen
hoogte x breedte x diepte (in mm): 8.4 x 143.8 x 69.3
Batterij
3000 mAh Lithium-Ion
Besturingssysteem
Android 8.1 Oreo
Camera
Primary Camera: 16 MPix QLens, PDAF, HDR, Low Light mode, autofocus
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix portretmodus
Bijkomende functionaliteiten
Luidsprekers: 2 luidsprekers, Toetsenbord: digitaal, USB lader, USB Type-C kabel, SIM naald, 24 Maanden Garantie, IP68, SAR waarde (head): 0.357 W/kg, SAR waarde (body): 1.55 W/kg, fanless
Gewicht
145 g, Voeding: 63 g
Prijs
400 Euro

 

LG Q7 Plus
LG Q7 Plus
LG Q7 Plus
LG Q7 Plus
LG Q7 Plus
LG Q7 Plus
LG Q7 Plus
LG Q7 Plus
LG Q7 Plus
LG Q7 Plus
LG Q7 Plus
LG Q7 Plus

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
BlackBerry Motion
Adreno 506, 625, 32 GB eMMC Flash
345 MBit/s ∼100% +708%
Nubia Z17 mini
Adreno 510, 652 MSM8976, 128 GB eMMC Flash
341 MBit/s ∼99% +699%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
Adreno 508, 630, 64 GB eMMC Flash
334 MBit/s ∼97% +682%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
Adreno 512, 660, 64 GB eMMC Flash
281 MBit/s ∼81% +558%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 939, n=249)
187 MBit/s ∼54% +338%
LG Q7 Plus
Mali-T860 MP2, MT6750S, 64 GB eMMC Flash
42.7 MBit/s ∼12%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
Adreno 512, 660, 64 GB eMMC Flash
346 MBit/s ∼100% +535%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
Adreno 508, 630, 64 GB eMMC Flash
329 MBit/s ∼95% +504%
Nubia Z17 mini
Adreno 510, 652 MSM8976, 128 GB eMMC Flash
233 MBit/s ∼67% +328%
BlackBerry Motion
Adreno 506, 625, 32 GB eMMC Flash
230 MBit/s ∼66% +322%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 703, n=249)
183 MBit/s ∼53% +236%
LG Q7 Plus
Mali-T860 MP2, MT6750S, 64 GB eMMC Flash
54.5 MBit/s ∼16%
LG Q7 Plus
LG Q7 Plus
LG Q7 Plus
LG Q7 Plus
LG Q7 Plus
LG Q7 Plus
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500

Beeldvergelijking

Bekijk een scène en navigeer binnen het eerste beeld. Eén klik wijzigt het zoomniveau. Eén klik op het ingezoomde beeld opent het origineel in een nieuw venster. Het eerste beeld toont de verschaalde foto van het testtoestel.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
klik om beelden te laden
419
cd/m²
427
cd/m²
416
cd/m²
391
cd/m²
431
cd/m²
432
cd/m²
392
cd/m²
430
cd/m²
437
cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 437 cd/m² Gemiddelde: 419.4 cd/m² Minimum: 4.71 cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling: 89 %
Helderheid in Batterij-modus: 431 cd/m²
Contrast: 743:1 (Zwart: 0.58 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.2 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.3
ΔE Greyscale 6.2 | 0.64-98 Ø6.5
97.1% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.26
LG Q7 Plus
IPS, 2160x1080, 5.5
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
LTPS, 2160x1080, 5.65
Nubia Z17 mini
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2
BlackBerry Motion
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5
Screen
30%
-5%
-2%
39%
Brightness middle
431
675
57%
405
-6%
326
-24%
656
52%
Brightness
419
650
55%
406
-3%
318
-24%
634
51%
Brightness Distribution
89
92
3%
91
2%
94
6%
93
4%
Black Level *
0.58
0.46
21%
0.61
-5%
0.32
45%
0.4
31%
Contrast
743
1467
97%
664
-11%
1019
37%
1640
121%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
6.2
5.9
5%
6.5
-5%
6.3
-2%
5.3
15%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
10.1
9.5
6%
9.3
8%
11.3
-12%
7.8
23%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
6.2
6.6
-6%
7.4
-19%
8.8
-42%
5.2
16%
Gamma
2.26 106%
2.36 102%
2 120%
2.59 93%
2.22 108%
CCT
8064 81%
7846 83%
8329 78%
8920 73%
7905 82%

* ... kleiner is beter

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Om de schermhelderheid te verlagen schakelen sommige laptops het backlight erg snel aan en uit. Dit gebeurt aan een dergelijk hoge frequentie dat het niet zichtbaar is voor het menselijk oog. Als de frequentie te laag is kunnen personen met gevoelige ogen geïrriteerd geraken, hoofdpijn krijgen en zelfs flickering waarnemen.
Screen flickering / PWM niet waargenomen

Ter vergelijking: 54 % van alle geteste toestellen maakten geen gebruik van PWM om de schermhelderheid te verlagen. Als het wel werd gebruikt, werd een gemiddelde van 8882 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz waargenomen.

Responstijd Scherm

De responstijden van het scherm tonen hoe snel het scherm in staat is om van één kleur naar de andere te veranderen. Trage responstijden kunnen aanleiding geven tot 'nabeelden' rond bewegende objecten of het scherm wazig maken (blur). Vooral spelers van snelle 3D-games hebben baat bij een scherm met snelle responstijden.
       Responstijd Zwart naar Wit
26.8 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd↗ 14.8 ms stijging
↘ 12 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde relatief trage responstijden in onze tests en is misschien te traag voor games.
Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.8 (minimum) tot 240 (maximum) ms. » 53 % van alle toestellen zijn beter.
Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd vergelijkbaar is met het gemiddelde (25.9 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.
       Responstijd 50% Grijs naar 80% Grijs
38.4 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd↗ 18 ms stijging
↘ 20.4 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde trage responstijden in onze tests en is misschien te traag voor games.
Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.9 (minimum) tot 636 (maximum) ms. » 38 % van alle toestellen zijn beter.
Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd vergelijkbaar is met het gemiddelde (41.4 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sorteer op waarde)
LG Q7 Plus
44064 Points ∼38%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
115834 Points ∼100% +163%
Nubia Z17 mini
87232 Points ∼75% +98%
BlackBerry Motion
59867 Points ∼52% +36%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
68282 Points ∼59% +55%
Average Mediatek MT6750S
44064 Points ∼38% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (23275 - 230642, n=342)
70364 Points ∼61% +60%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sorteer op waarde)
LG Q7 Plus
52855 Points ∼38%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
140875 Points ∼100% +167%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
87300 Points ∼62% +65%
Average Mediatek MT6750S
52855 Points ∼38% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (25692 - 290397, n=114)
102559 Points ∼73% +94%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sorteer op waarde)
LG Q7 Plus
3080 Points ∼52%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
5965 Points ∼100% +94%
Nubia Z17 mini
4695 Points ∼79% +52%
BlackBerry Motion
4873 Points ∼82% +58%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
5085 Points ∼85% +65%
Average Mediatek MT6750S
3080 Points ∼52% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (2399 - 8601, n=202)
4443 Points ∼74% +44%
Work performance score (sorteer op waarde)
LG Q7 Plus
3969 Points ∼63%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
6332 Points ∼100% +60%
Nubia Z17 mini
6093 Points ∼96% +54%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
6264 Points ∼99% +58%
Average Mediatek MT6750S
3969 Points ∼63% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (2516 - 10264, n=366)
4673 Points ∼74% +18%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sorteer op waarde)
LG Q7 Plus
751 Points ∼66%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
1146 Points ∼100% +53%
Nubia Z17 mini
10 Points ∼1% -99%
BlackBerry Motion
739 Points ∼64% -2%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
766 Points ∼67% +2%
Average Mediatek MT6750S
751 Points ∼66% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (7 - 1682, n=442)
670 Points ∼58% -11%
Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
LG Q7 Plus
631 Points ∼28%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
2279 Points ∼100% +261%
Nubia Z17 mini
1832 Points ∼80% +190%
BlackBerry Motion
968 Points ∼42% +53%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
1496 Points ∼66% +137%
Average Mediatek MT6750S
631 Points ∼28% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (18 - 9248, n=442)
1502 Points ∼66% +138%
Memory (sorteer op waarde)
LG Q7 Plus
800 Points ∼32%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
2494 Points ∼100% +212%
Nubia Z17 mini
2150 Points ∼86% +169%
BlackBerry Motion
773 Points ∼31% -3%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
1380 Points ∼55% +73%
Average Mediatek MT6750S
800 Points ∼32% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (21 - 4798, n=442)
1123 Points ∼45% +40%
System (sorteer op waarde)
LG Q7 Plus
1407 Points ∼28%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
5048 Points ∼100% +259%
Nubia Z17 mini
3829 Points ∼76% +172%
BlackBerry Motion
2800 Points ∼55% +99%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
3319 Points ∼66% +136%
Average Mediatek MT6750S
1407 Points ∼28% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (369 - 10281, n=442)
2241 Points ∼44% +59%
Overall (sorteer op waarde)
LG Q7 Plus
855 Points ∼36%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
2394 Points ∼100% +180%
Nubia Z17 mini
621 Points ∼26% -27%
BlackBerry Motion
1116 Points ∼47% +31%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
1513 Points ∼63% +77%
Average Mediatek MT6750S
855 Points ∼36% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (1 - 4308, n=445)
1132 Points ∼47% +32%
Geekbench 4.1/4.2
Compute RenderScript Score (sorteer op waarde)
LG Q7 Plus
2084 Points ∼37%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
5688 Points ∼100% +173%
Nubia Z17 mini
4465 Points ∼78% +114%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
3942 Points ∼69% +89%
Average Mediatek MT6750S
2084 Points ∼37% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (836 - 14362, n=139)
3810 Points ∼67% +83%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sorteer op waarde)
LG Q7 Plus
2135 Points ∼36%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
5856 Points ∼100% +174%
Nubia Z17 mini
4612 Points ∼79% +116%
BlackBerry Motion
3644 Points ∼62% +71%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
4172 Points ∼71% +95%
Average Mediatek MT6750S
2135 Points ∼36% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (1099 - 10558, n=186)
3955 Points ∼68% +85%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sorteer op waarde)
LG Q7 Plus
639 Points ∼40%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
1579 Points ∼100% +147%
Nubia Z17 mini
1454 Points ∼92% +128%
BlackBerry Motion
847 Points ∼54% +33%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
865 Points ∼55% +35%
Average Mediatek MT6750S
639 Points ∼40% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (394 - 4265, n=187)
1171 Points ∼74% +83%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sorteer op waarde)
LG Q7 Plus
1031 Points ∼39%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
2628 Points ∼100% +155%
Nubia Z17 mini
2322 Points ∼88% +125%
BlackBerry Motion
1807 Points ∼69% +75%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
1751 Points ∼67% +70%
Average Mediatek MT6750S
1031 Points ∼39% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (0 - 3669, n=291)
1548 Points ∼59% +50%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
LG Q7 Plus
80 Points ∼7%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
1196 Points ∼100% +1395%
Nubia Z17 mini
827 Points ∼69% +934%
BlackBerry Motion
372 Points ∼31% +365%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
726 Points ∼61% +808%
Average Mediatek MT6750S
80 Points ∼7% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (0 - 5220, n=291)
1052 Points ∼88% +1215%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sorteer op waarde)
LG Q7 Plus
101 Points ∼7%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
1361 Points ∼100% +1248%
Nubia Z17 mini
965 Points ∼71% +855%
BlackBerry Motion
452 Points ∼33% +348%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
835 Points ∼61% +727%
Average Mediatek MT6750S
101 Points ∼7% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (0 - 4732, n=299)
1008 Points ∼74% +898%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sorteer op waarde)
LG Q7 Plus
1029 Points ∼39%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
2638 Points ∼100% +156%
Nubia Z17 mini
2229 Points ∼84% +117%
BlackBerry Motion
1850 Points ∼70% +80%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
1785 Points ∼68% +73%
Average Mediatek MT6750S
1029 Points ∼39% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (524 - 3642, n=322)
1452 Points ∼55% +41%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
LG Q7 Plus
96 Points ∼5%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
1938 Points ∼100% +1919%
Nubia Z17 mini
1379 Points ∼71% +1336%
BlackBerry Motion
701 Points ∼36% +630%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
1289 Points ∼67% +1243%
Average Mediatek MT6750S
96 Points ∼5% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (0 - 8312, n=322)
1421 Points ∼73% +1380%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sorteer op waarde)
LG Q7 Plus
120 Points ∼6%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
2059 Points ∼100% +1616%
Nubia Z17 mini
1507 Points ∼73% +1156%
BlackBerry Motion
813 Points ∼39% +578%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
1374 Points ∼67% +1045%
Average Mediatek MT6750S
120 Points ∼6% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (0 - 6378, n=330)
1223 Points ∼59% +919%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sorteer op waarde)
LG Q7 Plus
9903 Points ∼52%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
19050 Points ∼100% +92%
Nubia Z17 mini
10942 Points ∼57% +10%
BlackBerry Motion
15584 Points ∼82% +57%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
13014 Points ∼68% +31%
Average Mediatek MT6750S
9903 Points ∼52% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (735 - 36494, n=477)
12140 Points ∼64% +23%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sorteer op waarde)
LG Q7 Plus
9656 Points ∼33%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
29306 Points ∼100% +204%
Nubia Z17 mini
23175 Points ∼79% +140%
BlackBerry Motion
12930 Points ∼44% +34%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
18386 Points ∼63% +90%
Average Mediatek MT6750S
9656 Points ∼33% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (2396 - 113380, n=477)
15561 Points ∼53% +61%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sorteer op waarde)
LG Q7 Plus
9710 Points ∼37%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
26175 Points ∼100% +170%
Nubia Z17 mini
18563 Points ∼71% +91%
BlackBerry Motion
13439 Points ∼51% +38%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
16841 Points ∼64% +73%
Average Mediatek MT6750S
9710 Points ∼37% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (2841 - 64405, n=478)
13454 Points ∼51% +39%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sorteer op waarde)
LG Q7 Plus
17 fps ∼37%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
46 fps ∼100% +171%
Nubia Z17 mini
36 fps ∼78% +112%
BlackBerry Motion
22 fps ∼48% +29%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
30 fps ∼65% +76%
Average Mediatek MT6750S
17 fps ∼37% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (4.1 - 177, n=503)
26.9 fps ∼58% +58%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sorteer op waarde)
LG Q7 Plus
16 fps ∼31%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
51 fps ∼100% +219%
Nubia Z17 mini
37 fps ∼73% +131%
BlackBerry Motion
21 fps ∼41% +31%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
29 fps ∼57% +81%
Average Mediatek MT6750S
16 fps ∼31% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (6.9 - 120, n=506)
23.5 fps ∼46% +47%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sorteer op waarde)
LG Q7 Plus
7.1 fps ∼31%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
23 fps ∼100% +224%
Nubia Z17 mini
17 fps ∼74% +139%
BlackBerry Motion
9.3 fps ∼40% +31%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
14 fps ∼61% +97%
Average Mediatek MT6750S
7.1 fps ∼31% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (1.6 - 88.2, n=426)
14.3 fps ∼62% +101%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sorteer op waarde)
LG Q7 Plus
6.8 fps ∼31%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
22 fps ∼100% +224%
Nubia Z17 mini
17 fps ∼77% +150%
BlackBerry Motion
9.5 fps ∼43% +40%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
14 fps ∼64% +106%
Average Mediatek MT6750S
6.8 fps ∼31% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (4.1 - 115, n=428)
14.5 fps ∼66% +113%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
LG Q7 Plus
4.7 fps ∼31%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
15 fps ∼100% +219%
Nubia Z17 mini
10 fps ∼67% +113%
BlackBerry Motion
6.3 fps ∼42% +34%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
9.7 fps ∼65% +106%
Average Mediatek MT6750S
4.7 fps ∼31% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (0 - 60, n=289)
12.5 fps ∼83% +166%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
LG Q7 Plus
4.5 fps ∼32%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
14 fps ∼100% +211%
Nubia Z17 mini
11 fps ∼79% +144%
BlackBerry Motion
6.1 fps ∼44% +36%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
9.5 fps ∼68% +111%
Average Mediatek MT6750S
4.5 fps ∼32% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (0 - 110, n=291)
12.6 fps ∼90% +180%
GFXBench 4.0
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
LG Q7 Plus
2.5 fps ∼27%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
9.1 fps ∼100% +264%
Nubia Z17 mini
6 fps ∼66% +140%
BlackBerry Motion
3.4 fps ∼37% +36%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
5.3 fps ∼58% +112%
Average Mediatek MT6750S
2.5 fps ∼27% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (0 - 35, n=220)
8.47 fps ∼93% +239%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
LG Q7 Plus
2.4 fps ∼28%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
8.6 fps ∼100% +258%
Nubia Z17 mini
6 fps ∼70% +150%
BlackBerry Motion
3.4 fps ∼40% +42%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
5.3 fps ∼62% +121%
Average Mediatek MT6750S
2.4 fps ∼28% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (0 - 50, n=223)
7.79 fps ∼91% +225%
Lightmark - 1920x1080 1080p (sorteer op waarde)
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
9.81 fps ∼81%
Average of class Smartphone (1.06 - 38.7, n=72)
12.1 fps ∼100%
Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sorteer op waarde)
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
190 Points ∼33%
Average of class Smartphone (36.3 - 1702, n=62)
573 Points ∼100%

Legende

 
LG Q7 Plus Mediatek MT6750S, ARM Mali-T860 MP2, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Qualcomm Adreno 512, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Nubia Z17 mini Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976, Qualcomm Adreno 510, 128 GB eMMC Flash
 
BlackBerry Motion Qualcomm Snapdragon 625, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Qualcomm Adreno 508, 64 GB eMMC Flash
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro (Chrome 67)
49.396 Points ∼100% +164%
Nubia Z17 mini (Chrome 63)
45.1 Points ∼91% +141%
Average of class Smartphone (11 - 224, n=361)
33.6 Points ∼68% +80%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL (Chrome 62)
28.09 Points ∼57% +50%
BlackBerry Motion
27.194 Points ∼55% +45%
Average Mediatek MT6750S
18.7 Points ∼38% 0%
LG Q7 Plus (Chrome 67)
18.694 Points ∼38%
Octane V2 - Total Score
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro (Chrome 67)
9582 Points ∼100% +180%
Nubia Z17 mini (Chrome 63)
9187 Points ∼96% +168%
Average of class Smartphone (1506 - 35255, n=497)
5005 Points ∼52% +46%
BlackBerry Motion
4409 Points ∼46% +29%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL (Chrome 62)
4398 Points ∼46% +29%
LG Q7 Plus (Chrome 67)
3422 Points ∼36%
Average Mediatek MT6750S
3422 Points ∼36% 0%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average Mediatek MT6750S
13671 ms * ∼100% -0%
LG Q7 Plus (Chrome 67)
13670.9 ms * ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone (718 - 59466, n=516)
11897 ms * ∼87% +13%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL (Chrome 62)
9425 ms * ∼69% +31%
BlackBerry Motion
9316.4 ms * ∼68% +32%
Nubia Z17 mini (Chrome 63)
4411 ms * ∼32% +68%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro (Chrome 67)
4093.5 ms * ∼30% +70%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro (Chrome 67)
159 Points ∼100% +127%
Average of class Smartphone (27 - 362, n=246)
99.4 Points ∼63% +42%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL (Chrome 62)
95 Points ∼60% +36%
LG Q7 Plus (Chrome 67)
70 Points ∼44%
Average Mediatek MT6750S
70 Points ∼44% 0%

* ... kleiner is beter

LG Q7 PlusBQ Aquaris X2 ProNubia Z17 miniBlackBerry MotionAsus ZenFone 4 ZE554KLAverage 64 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
17%
14%
10%
17%
6%
-19%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
62.2 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
61.13 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-2%
58.78 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-5%
61.23 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-2%
66.51 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
7%
52.1 (19.6 - 74.7, n=50)
-16%
44 (6.38 - 87.1, n=276)
-29%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
81.45 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
83.35 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
2%
78 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-4%
84.68 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
4%
86.93 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
7%
70.5 (21.1 - 86.9, n=50)
-13%
62.3 (10.8 - 96.5, n=276)
-24%
Random Write 4KB
11.91
15.43
30%
15.9
34%
11.61
-3%
7.59
-36%
15.4 (3.4 - 71.1, n=57)
29%
13.5 (0.14 - 164, n=552)
13%
Random Read 4KB
35.8
51.25
43%
60
68%
67.25
88%
68.57
92%
48.1 (11.4 - 149, n=57)
34%
34.5 (1.59 - 173, n=552)
-4%
Sequential Write 256KB
186.55
204.83
10%
143.8
-23%
92.67
-50%
205.27
10%
160 (40 - 216, n=57)
-14%
72.1 (2.99 - 228, n=552)
-61%
Sequential Read 256KB
235.9
280.78
19%
267
13%
285.48
21%
287.38
22%
266 (115 - 704, n=57)
13%
211 (12.1 - 832, n=552)
-11%
Arena of Valor
 InstellingenWaarde
 min23 fps
  Your browser does not support the canvas element!
Asphalt 8: Airborne
 InstellingenWaarde
 very low27 fps
  Your browser does not support the canvas element!
Max. Belasting
 37.2 °C37 °C37.7 °C 
 37.5 °C36.8 °C37.5 °C 
 38.1 °C38.1 °C37.6 °C 
Maximum: 38.1 °C
Gemiddelde: 37.5 °C
33.1 °C34.8 °C34.7 °C
33.6 °C37.1 °C34.9 °C
34.2 °C38.1 °C37.9 °C
Maximum: 38.1 °C
Gemiddelde: 35.4 °C
Stroomadapter (max.)  26.2 °C | Kamertemperatuur 20.8 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2033.928.62528.436.33136.128.54030.928.85030.6326322.228.38024.919.610024.42212523.523.516020.319.920019.823.925018.229.831517.441.240016.649.950017.154.163015.95880015.969.3100015.969.1125016.772.716001673.2200015.969250016.274315016.475.940001780.3500016.573.1630016.466.8800016.665.9100001772.21250016.563.61600016.947.5SPL28.685.5N1.157median 16.6LG Q7 Plusmedian 65.9Delta1.616.233.929.528.437.736.130.530.929.230.63222.225.624.922.324.422.723.52720.327.719.845.718.249.217.458.216.661.917.16215.961.315.957.115.963.616.773.31674.515.970.916.272.816.471.51774.116.573.316.468.416.665.61765.316.55716.949.228.683.21.151.8median 16.6BQ Aquaris X2 Promedian 621.69.8hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
LG Q7 Plus audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 39.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 7.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (31.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 86% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 9% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 91% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 5% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

BQ Aquaris X2 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 44% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 46% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 68% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Stroomgebruik
Uit / Standbydarklight 0.01 / 0.16 Watt
Inactiefdarkmidlight 1 / 1.57 / 1.64 Watt
Belasting midlight 4.1 / 6.02 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
LG Q7 Plus
3000 mAh
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
3100 mAh
Nubia Z17 mini
2950 mAh
BlackBerry Motion
4000 mAh
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
3300 mAh
Average Mediatek MT6750S
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-15%
-28%
-18%
-19%
0%
-1%
Idle Minimum *
1
0.63
37%
0.83
17%
1.45
-45%
0.84
16%
1
-0%
0.866 (0.2 - 3.4, n=576)
13%
Idle Average *
1.57
2.16
-38%
2.01
-28%
2.1
-34%
2.31
-47%
1.57
-0%
1.697 (0.6 - 6.2, n=575)
-8%
Idle Maximum *
1.64
2.18
-33%
2.02
-23%
2.13
-30%
2.33
-42%
1.64
-0%
1.945 (0.74 - 6.6, n=576)
-19%
Load Average *
4.1
4.48
-9%
5.95
-45%
4.01
2%
4.76
-16%
4.1
-0%
3.97 (0.8 - 10.8, n=570)
3%
Load Maximum *
6.02
7.87
-31%
9.65
-60%
5.09
15%
6.39
-6%
6.02
-0%
5.6 (1.2 - 14.2, n=570)
7%

* ... kleiner is beter

Batterijduur
Inactief (zonder WLAN, minimale helderheid)
16h 20min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
10h 20min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
7h 35min
Belast (maximale helderheid)
3h 50min
LG Q7 Plus
3000 mAh
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
3100 mAh
Nubia Z17 mini
2950 mAh
BlackBerry Motion
4000 mAh
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
3300 mAh
Batterijduur
12%
-20%
31%
35%
Reader / Idle
980
1374
40%
1665
70%
H.264
455
658
45%
698
53%
WiFi v1.3
620
605
-2%
497
-20%
810
31%
562
-9%
Load
230
145
-37%
286
24%

Pro

+ zeer goede geluidskwaliteit via 3.5 mm poort
+ lange looptijden
+ IP68 stof- en waterbestendig

Contra

- systeemprestaties
- WLAN snelheid
- contrastarm beeldscherm

Samenvatting

Getest: LG Q7 Plus. Testmodel geleverd door LG Germany.
Getest: LG Q7 Plus. Testmodel geleverd door LG Germany.

Voor het volledige, Engelse testrapport, klik hier.

Na een grondige beoordeling liet de Q7 Plus ons met gemengde indrukken achter. Aan de ene kant biedt de smartphone een aantal sterke verkooppunten: een zeer goede batterijlevensduur, de mogelijkheid om de opslagruimte met maximaal 2 TB uit te breiden en een uitstekende geluidskwaliteit op externe luidsprekers. Aan de andere kant liggen de prestaties veel te laag voor een apparaat dat €400 en de veel geadverteerde QLens-functie blijkt niets meer te zijn dan een eenvoudige zoekopdracht naar Amazon-afbeeldingen.

Ondanks de goede batterijlevensduur is LG's Q7 Plus een smartphone die zijn prijskaartje van 400 euro niet kan rechtvaardigen.

Als je de smartphone als een mini-multimediacentrum wilt gebruiken en alleen af en toe alleen een kiekje wilt nemen, met in het achterhoofd dat de meeste apps zonder problemen draaien, kunt u gerust tot aanschaf overgaan. Kopers die echter belang hechten aan goede systeemprestaties en misschien zelfs grafisch zwaardere games willen spelen, kunnen beter concurrerende modellen overwegen.

LG Q7 Plus - 30-07-2018 v6
Mike Wobker

Behuizing
82%
Toetsenbord
65 / 75 → 87%
Aanwijsapparaat
86%
Aansluitmogelijkheden
38 / 60 → 64%
Gewicht
93%
Batterij
91%
Beeldscherm
83%
Gaming-performance
14 / 63 → 23%
Applicatie-performance
40 / 70 → 57%
Temperatuur
90%
Luidheid
100%
Audio
76 / 91 → 83%
Camera
64%
Gemiddelde
71%
81%
Smartphone - Gewogen Gemiddelde

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Overzichten en testrapporten over laptops en mobieltjes > Testrapporten > Kort testrapport LG Q7 Plus Smartphone
Mike Wobker, 2018-08- 2 (Update: 2018-08- 2)