Notebookcheck

Kort testrapport LG Q Stylus Smartphone

Mike Wobker, 👁 Daniel Schmidt, Tanja Hinum-Balaz, 01-11-2018

Een betaalbare stylus smartphone. Beschermd tegen schokken, water en stof. Dit is hoe LG de Q Stylus presenteert. De smartphone komt met een stylus geïntegreerd in de 6.2-inch behuizing. Lees in ons testrapport wat de betaalbare smartphone nog meer te bieden heeft.

LG Q Stylus (Q Serie)
Processor
Mediatek MT6750S
Grafische kaart
ARM Mali-T860 MP2
Geheugen
3072 MB 
Beeldscherm
6.2 inch 2:1, 2160 x 1080 pixel 390 PPI, capacitief, IPS, glimmend: ja
Opslag
32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB 
, 20 GB beschikbaar
Verbindingen
1 USB 2.0, Audio Verbindingen: 3.5-inch audio jack, Card Reader: microSD (max. 2 TB, FAT, FAT32, exFAT), 1 Vingerafdruklezer, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensoren: versnellingssensor, nabijheidssensor, kompas, gyroscoop
Netwerkmogelijkheden
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n), Bluetooth 4.2, GSM (900/1800), 3G WCDMA (B1/B8), 4G LTE (B1/B3/B7/B8/B20/B28/B38), LTE, GPS
Afmetingen
hoogte x breedte x diepte (in mm): 8.4 x 160.2 x 77.8
Batterij
3300 mAh Lithium-Ion
Besturingssysteem
Android 8.1 Oreo
Camera
Primary Camera: 16 MPix
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix
Bijkomende functionaliteiten
Luidsprekers: 1, Toetsenbord: onscreen, Toetsenbordverlichting: ja, USB stroomadapter, USB Type-C-kabel, SIM-tool, 24 Maanden Garantie, SAR waarde (hoofd): 0.46 W/kg, SAR waarde (lichaam): 1.02 W/kg, fanless
Gewicht
172 g, Voeding: 66 g
Prijs
280 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

LG Q Stylus
LG Q Stylus
LG Q Stylus
LG Q Stylus
LG Q Stylus
LG Q Stylus

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
675 (min: 630, max: 704) MBit/s ∼100% +998%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9
Mali-G72 MP18, 9810, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
485 MBit/s ∼72% +689%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
Adreno 508, 630, 32 GB eMMC Flash
309 MBit/s ∼46% +402%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 939, n=292)
200 MBit/s ∼30% +225%
LG Q Stylus
Mali-T860 MP2, MT6750S, 32 GB eMMC Flash
61.5 (min: 43, max: 58) MBit/s ∼9%
Sharp B10
Mali-T860 MP2, MT6750, 32 GB eMMC Flash
57.2 MBit/s ∼8% -7%
Wiko View 2 Pro
Adreno 506, 450, 64 GB eMMC Flash
43 MBit/s ∼6% -30%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
647 (min: 598, max: 665) MBit/s ∼100% +1697%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9
Mali-G72 MP18, 9810, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
485 MBit/s ∼75% +1247%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
Adreno 508, 630, 32 GB eMMC Flash
347 MBit/s ∼54% +864%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 703, n=292)
195 MBit/s ∼30% +442%
Sharp B10
Mali-T860 MP2, MT6750, 32 GB eMMC Flash
58 MBit/s ∼9% +61%
Wiko View 2 Pro
Adreno 506, 450, 64 GB eMMC Flash
47.6 MBit/s ∼7% +32%
LG Q Stylus
Mali-T860 MP2, MT6750S, 32 GB eMMC Flash
36 (min: 2, max: 52) MBit/s ∼6%
0102030405060Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø52.8 (43-58)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø37.2 (2-52)
GPS LG Q Stylus
GPS LG Q Stylus
GPS LG Q Stylus
GPS LG Q Stylus
GPS LG Q Stylus
GPS LG Q Stylus
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500

Beeldvergelijking

Bekijk een scène en navigeer binnen het eerste beeld. Eén klik wijzigt het zoomniveau. Eén klik op het ingezoomde beeld opent het origineel in een nieuw venster. Het eerste beeld toont de verschaalde foto van het testtoestel.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
klik om beelden te laden
LG Q Stylus - test chart
LG Q Stylus - test chart (detail)
449
cd/m²
441
cd/m²
435
cd/m²
433
cd/m²
458
cd/m²
444
cd/m²
429
cd/m²
429
cd/m²
449
cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 458 cd/m² Gemiddelde: 440.8 cd/m² Minimum: 4.01 cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling: 94 %
Helderheid in Batterij-modus: 458 cd/m²
Contrast: 898:1 (Zwart: 0.51 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.5 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.3
ΔE Greyscale 5.1 | 0.64-98 Ø6.5
99.4% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.33
LG Q Stylus
IPS, 2160x1080, 6.2
Samsung Galaxy Note 9
Super AMOLED, 2960x1440, 6.4
Sharp B10
IPS, 1440x720, 5.7
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
IPS, 2246x1080, 6.18
Wiko View 2 Pro
IPS, 1528x720, 6
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
IPS, 2160x1080, 6
Screen
4%
-1%
17%
-32%
39%
Brightness middle
458
499
9%
560
22%
489
7%
562
23%
597
30%
Brightness
441
506
15%
549
24%
486
10%
541
23%
592
34%
Brightness Distribution
94
96
2%
90
-4%
93
-1%
92
-2%
92
-2%
Black Level *
0.51
0.63
-24%
0.34
33%
0.56
-10%
0.32
37%
Contrast
898
889
-1%
1438
60%
1004
12%
1866
108%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.5
4.62
-3%
5.02
-12%
3.8
16%
7.9
-76%
2.4
47%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
7.1
10.91
-54%
8.71
-23%
7.1
-0%
15.7
-121%
5.3
25%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
5.1
2.2
57%
4.6
10%
4.4
14%
10.4
-104%
3.4
33%
Gamma
2.33 94%
2.103 105%
2.216 99%
2.22 99%
2.02 109%
2.2 100%
CCT
7381 88%
6115 106%
7587 86%
7213 90%
8834 74%
7172 91%

* ... kleiner is beter

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Om de schermhelderheid te verlagen schakelen sommige laptops het backlight erg snel aan en uit. Dit gebeurt aan een dergelijk hoge frequentie dat het niet zichtbaar is voor het menselijk oog. Als de frequentie te laag is kunnen personen met gevoelige ogen geïrriteerd geraken, hoofdpijn krijgen en zelfs flickering waarnemen.
Screen flickering / PWM niet waargenomen

Ter vergelijking: 53 % van alle geteste toestellen maakten geen gebruik van PWM om de schermhelderheid te verlagen. Als het wel werd gebruikt, werd een gemiddelde van 8668 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz waargenomen.

Responstijd Scherm

De responstijden van het scherm tonen hoe snel het scherm in staat is om van één kleur naar de andere te veranderen. Trage responstijden kunnen aanleiding geven tot 'nabeelden' rond bewegende objecten of het scherm wazig maken (blur). Vooral spelers van snelle 3D-games hebben baat bij een scherm met snelle responstijden.
       Responstijd Zwart naar Wit
28.8 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd↗ 9.2 ms stijging
↘ 19.6 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde relatief trage responstijden in onze tests en is misschien te traag voor games.
Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.8 (minimum) tot 240 (maximum) ms. » 67 % van alle toestellen zijn beter.
Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd slechter is dan het gemiddelde (25.6 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.
       Responstijd 50% Grijs naar 80% Grijs
67.2 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd↗ 37.2 ms stijging
↘ 30 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde trage responstijden in onze tests en is misschien te traag voor games.
Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.9 (minimum) tot 636 (maximum) ms. » 97 % van alle toestellen zijn beter.
Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd slechter is dan het gemiddelde (41 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.
Geekbench 4.1/4.2
Compute RenderScript Score (sorteer op waarde)
LG Q Stylus
1909 Points ∼13%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9
9059 Points ∼63% +375%
Sharp B10
1778 Points ∼12% -7%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
14369 Points ∼100% +653%
Wiko View 2 Pro
3362 Points ∼23% +76%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
3621 Points ∼25% +90%
Average Mediatek MT6750S (1909 - 2084, n=2)
1997 Points ∼14% +5%
Average of class Smartphone (836 - 21070, n=178)
4299 Points ∼30% +125%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sorteer op waarde)
LG Q Stylus
2798 Points ∼30%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9
8874 Points ∼97% +217%
Sharp B10
2629 Points ∼29% -6%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
9182 Points ∼100% +228%
Wiko View 2 Pro
4022 Points ∼44% +44%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
4152 Points ∼45% +48%
Average Mediatek MT6750S (2135 - 2798, n=2)
2467 Points ∼27% -12%
Average of class Smartphone (1099 - 11598, n=228)
4210 Points ∼46% +50%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sorteer op waarde)
LG Q Stylus
653 Points ∼26%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9
1698 Points ∼69% +160%
Sharp B10
612 Points ∼25% -6%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
2468 Points ∼100% +278%
Wiko View 2 Pro
778 Points ∼32% +19%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
858 Points ∼35% +31%
Average Mediatek MT6750S (639 - 653, n=2)
646 Points ∼26% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (394 - 4824, n=229)
1244 Points ∼50% +91%
PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sorteer op waarde)
LG Q Stylus
4101 Points ∼42%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9
5960 Points ∼62% +45%
Sharp B10
4447 Points ∼46% +8%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
9664 Points ∼100% +136%
Wiko View 2 Pro
5395 Points ∼56% +32%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
5659 Points ∼59% +38%
Average Mediatek MT6750S (3969 - 4101, n=2)
4035 Points ∼42% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (4101 - 13211, n=404)
4840 Points ∼50% +18%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sorteer op waarde)
LG Q Stylus
1110 Points ∼42%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9
2613 Points ∼100% +135%
Sharp B10
694 Points ∼27% -37%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
2257 Points ∼86% +103%
Wiko View 2 Pro
1808 Points ∼69% +63%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
1756 Points ∼67% +58%
Average Mediatek MT6750S (999 - 1110, n=2)
1055 Points ∼40% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (611 - 4364, n=259)
1668 Points ∼64% +50%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
LG Q Stylus
319 Points ∼7%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9
3797 Points ∼85% +1090%
Sharp B10
322 Points ∼7% +1%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
4468 Points ∼100% +1301%
Wiko View 2 Pro
415 Points ∼9% +30%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
793 Points ∼18% +149%
Average Mediatek MT6750S (316 - 319, n=2)
318 Points ∼7% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (75 - 8206, n=259)
1400 Points ∼31% +339%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sorteer op waarde)
LG Q Stylus
379 Points ∼10%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9
3450 Points ∼94% +810%
Sharp B10
366 Points ∼10% -3%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
3669 Points ∼100% +868%
Wiko View 2 Pro
501 Points ∼14% +32%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
903 Points ∼25% +138%
Average Mediatek MT6750S (373 - 379, n=2)
376 Points ∼10% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (93 - 5189, n=262)
1301 Points ∼35% +243%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sorteer op waarde)
LG Q Stylus
1112 Points ∼39%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9
2649 Points ∼94% +138%
Sharp B10
771 Points ∼27% -31%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
2832 Points ∼100% +155%
Wiko View 2 Pro
1810 Points ∼64% +63%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
1744 Points ∼62% +57%
Average Mediatek MT6750S (976 - 1112, n=2)
1044 Points ∼37% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (530 - 4407, n=273)
1648 Points ∼58% +48%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
LG Q Stylus
495 Points ∼7%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9
4904 Points ∼71% +891%
Sharp B10
477 Points ∼7% -4%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
6898 Points ∼100% +1294%
Wiko View 2 Pro
716 Points ∼10% +45%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
1303 Points ∼19% +163%
Average Mediatek MT6750S (493 - 495, n=2)
494 Points ∼7% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (131 - 14951, n=273)
1976 Points ∼29% +299%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sorteer op waarde)
LG Q Stylus
565 Points ∼11%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9
4124 Points ∼79% +630%
Sharp B10
521 Points ∼10% -8%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
5230 Points ∼100% +826%
Wiko View 2 Pro
827 Points ∼16% +46%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
1381 Points ∼26% +144%
Average Mediatek MT6750S (554 - 565, n=2)
560 Points ∼11% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (159 - 7856, n=274)
1657 Points ∼32% +193%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sorteer op waarde)
LG Q Stylus
1172 Points ∼46%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9
2569 Points ∼100% +119%
Sharp B10
702 Points ∼27% -40%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
2528 Points ∼98% +116%
Wiko View 2 Pro
1855 Points ∼72% +58%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
1712 Points ∼67% +46%
Average Mediatek MT6750S (1031 - 1172, n=2)
1102 Points ∼43% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (549 - 4183, n=334)
1604 Points ∼62% +37%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
LG Q Stylus
89 Points ∼2%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9
3673 Points ∼77% +4027%
Sharp B10
328 Points ∼7% +269%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
4746 Points ∼100% +5233%
Wiko View 2 Pro
369 Points ∼8% +315%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
718 Points ∼15% +707%
Average Mediatek MT6750S (80 - 89, n=2)
84.5 Points ∼2% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (69 - 5241, n=334)
1132 Points ∼24% +1172%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sorteer op waarde)
LG Q Stylus
112 Points ∼3%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9
3353 Points ∼84% +2894%
Sharp B10
372 Points ∼9% +232%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
3972 Points ∼100% +3446%
Wiko View 2 Pro
449 Points ∼11% +301%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
824 Points ∼21% +636%
Average Mediatek MT6750S (101 - 112, n=2)
107 Points ∼3% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (86 - 4734, n=342)
1083 Points ∼27% +867%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sorteer op waarde)
LG Q Stylus
1172 Points ∼43%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9
2515 Points ∼92% +115%
Sharp B10
694 Points ∼26% -41%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
2720 Points ∼100% +132%
Wiko View 2 Pro
1833 Points ∼67% +56%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
1757 Points ∼65% +50%
Average Mediatek MT6750S (1029 - 1172, n=2)
1101 Points ∼40% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (532 - 4150, n=365)
1500 Points ∼55% +28%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
LG Q Stylus
98 Points ∼1%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9
4826 Points ∼58% +4824%
Sharp B10
480 Points ∼6% +390%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
8261 Points ∼100% +8330%
Wiko View 2 Pro
706 Points ∼9% +620%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
1248 Points ∼15% +1173%
Average Mediatek MT6750S (96 - 98, n=2)
97 Points ∼1% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (98 - 8312, n=365)
1549 Points ∼19% +1481%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sorteer op waarde)
LG Q Stylus
123 Points ∼2%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9
4008 Points ∼70% +3159%
Sharp B10
515 Points ∼9% +319%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
5687 Points ∼100% +4524%
Wiko View 2 Pro
818 Points ∼14% +565%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
1334 Points ∼23% +985%
Average Mediatek MT6750S (120 - 123, n=2)
122 Points ∼2% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (123 - 6378, n=373)
1321 Points ∼23% +974%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sorteer op waarde)
LG Q Stylus
10050 Points ∼29%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9
18756 Points ∼54% +87%
Sharp B10
7716 Points ∼22% -23%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
34928 Points ∼100% +248%
Wiko View 2 Pro
15177 Points ∼43% +51%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
13217 Points ∼38% +32%
Average Mediatek MT6750S (9903 - 10050, n=2)
9977 Points ∼29% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (7095 - 36762, n=520)
12608 Points ∼36% +25%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sorteer op waarde)
LG Q Stylus
9864 Points ∼12%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9
36190 Points ∼44% +267%
Sharp B10
9749 Points ∼12% -1%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
82125 Points ∼100% +733%
Wiko View 2 Pro
12550 Points ∼15% +27%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
18472 Points ∼22% +87%
Average Mediatek MT6750S (9656 - 9864, n=2)
9760 Points ∼12% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (2465 - 162695, n=520)
17305 Points ∼21% +75%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sorteer op waarde)
LG Q Stylus
9905 Points ∼16%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9
29994 Points ∼47% +203%
Sharp B10
9210 Points ∼15% -7%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
63159 Points ∼100% +538%
Wiko View 2 Pro
12878 Points ∼20% +30%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
16972 Points ∼27% +71%
Average Mediatek MT6750S (9710 - 9905, n=2)
9808 Points ∼16% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (2915 - 77599, n=521)
14568 Points ∼23% +47%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sorteer op waarde)
LG Q Stylus
17 fps ∼11%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9
146 fps ∼97% +759%
Sharp B10
17 fps ∼11% 0%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
150 fps ∼100% +782%
Wiko View 2 Pro
22 fps ∼15% +29%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
30 fps ∼20% +76%
Average Mediatek MT6750S (17 - 17, n=2)
17 fps ∼11% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (4.1 - 251, n=546)
30.1 fps ∼20% +77%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sorteer op waarde)
LG Q Stylus
16 fps ∼27%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9
60 fps ∼100% +275%
Sharp B10
25 fps ∼42% +56%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
60 fps ∼100% +275%
Wiko View 2 Pro
33 fps ∼55% +106%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
28 fps ∼47% +75%
Average Mediatek MT6750S (16 - 16, n=2)
16 fps ∼27% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (6.9 - 120, n=549)
24.4 fps ∼41% +53%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sorteer op waarde)
LG Q Stylus
7.1 fps ∼9%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9
76 fps ∼100% +970%
Sharp B10
6.8 fps ∼9% -4%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
71 fps ∼93% +900%
Wiko View 2 Pro
9.4 fps ∼12% +32%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
14 fps ∼18% +97%
Average Mediatek MT6750S (7.1 - 7.1, n=2)
7.1 fps ∼9% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (2.2 - 132, n=468)
16.1 fps ∼21% +127%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sorteer op waarde)
LG Q Stylus
6.7 fps ∼12%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9
47 fps ∼81% +601%
Sharp B10
13 fps ∼22% +94%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
58 fps ∼100% +766%
Wiko View 2 Pro
17 fps ∼29% +154%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
13 fps ∼22% +94%
Average Mediatek MT6750S (6.7 - 6.8, n=2)
6.75 fps ∼12% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (4.1 - 115, n=471)
15.5 fps ∼27% +131%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
LG Q Stylus
4.7 fps ∼10%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9
45 fps ∼100% +857%
Sharp B10
4.6 fps ∼10% -2%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
35 fps ∼78% +645%
Wiko View 2 Pro
6.1 fps ∼14% +30%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
9.8 fps ∼22% +109%
Average Mediatek MT6750S (4.7 - 4.7, n=2)
4.7 fps ∼10% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (1.3 - 88, n=333)
13.7 fps ∼30% +191%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
LG Q Stylus
4.5 fps ∼8%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9
25 fps ∼46% +456%
Sharp B10
9.9 fps ∼18% +120%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
54 fps ∼100% +1100%
Wiko View 2 Pro
12 fps ∼22% +167%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
9.3 fps ∼17% +107%
Average Mediatek MT6750S (4.5 - 4.5, n=2)
4.5 fps ∼8% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (2.6 - 110, n=335)
13.5 fps ∼25% +200%
GFXBench
High Tier Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
LG Q Stylus
1.3 fps ∼6%
Sharp B10
2.9 fps ∼13% +123%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
22 fps ∼100% +1592%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
3.1 fps ∼14% +138%
Average Mediatek MT6750S
1.3 fps ∼6% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (1.3 - 59, n=46)
10.7 fps ∼49% +723%
2560x1440 High Tier Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
LG Q Stylus
0.86 fps ∼6%
Sharp B10
0.86 fps ∼6% 0%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
14 fps ∼100% +1528%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
1.9 fps ∼14% +121%
Average Mediatek MT6750S
0.86 fps ∼6% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (0.86 - 22, n=46)
6.33 fps ∼45% +636%
Normal Tier Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
LG Q Stylus
2 fps ∼6%
Sharp B10
4.6 fps ∼15% +130%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
31 fps ∼100% +1450%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
5.4 fps ∼17% +170%
Average Mediatek MT6750S
2 fps ∼6% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (2 - 59, n=46)
15 fps ∼48% +650%
1920x1080 Normal Tier Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
LG Q Stylus
2.3 fps ∼7%
Sharp B10
2.3 fps ∼7% 0%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
32 fps ∼100% +1291%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
5.6 fps ∼18% +143%
Average Mediatek MT6750S
2.3 fps ∼7% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (2.3 - 63, n=46)
16.3 fps ∼51% +609%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
LG Q Stylus
2.5 fps ∼7%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9
28 fps ∼80% +1020%
Sharp B10
2.4 fps ∼7% -4%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
35 fps ∼100% +1300%
Wiko View 2 Pro
3.5 fps ∼10% +40%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
5.6 fps ∼16% +124%
Average Mediatek MT6750S (2.5 - 2.5, n=2)
2.5 fps ∼7% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (0.72 - 54, n=263)
9.46 fps ∼27% +278%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
LG Q Stylus
2.4 fps ∼7%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9
15 fps ∼45% +525%
Sharp B10
4.8 fps ∼15% +100%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
33 fps ∼100% +1275%
Wiko View 2 Pro
6.6 fps ∼20% +175%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
5.3 fps ∼16% +121%
Average Mediatek MT6750S (2.4 - 2.4, n=2)
2.4 fps ∼7% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (1.1 - 58, n=266)
8.63 fps ∼26% +260%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sorteer op waarde)
LG Q Stylus
56626 Points ∼22%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9
236552 Points ∼90% +318%
Sharp B10
53835 Points ∼20% -5%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
263165 Points ∼100% +365%
Wiko View 2 Pro
69661 Points ∼26% +23%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
89006 Points ∼34% +57%
Average Mediatek MT6750S (52855 - 56626, n=2)
54741 Points ∼21% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (17073 - 348178, n=153)
112012 Points ∼43% +98%
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sorteer op waarde)
LG Q Stylus
45829 Points ∼20%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9
214090 Points ∼94% +367%
Sharp B10
42355 Points ∼19% -8%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
227026 Points ∼100% +395%
Wiko View 2 Pro
57201 Points ∼25% +25%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
70346 Points ∼31% +53%
Average Mediatek MT6750S (44064 - 45829, n=2)
44947 Points ∼20% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (23275 - 250848, n=378)
74328 Points ∼33% +62%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sorteer op waarde)
LG Q Stylus
657 Points ∼51%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9
1132 Points ∼87% +72%
Sharp B10
10 Points ∼1% -98%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
1296 Points ∼100% +97%
Wiko View 2 Pro
743 Points ∼57% +13%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
936 Points ∼72% +42%
Average Mediatek MT6750S (657 - 751, n=2)
704 Points ∼54% +7%
Average of class Smartphone (7 - 1731, n=481)
687 Points ∼53% +5%
Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
LG Q Stylus
633 Points ∼8%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9
6506 Points ∼82% +928%
Sharp B10
644 Points ∼8% +2%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
7945 Points ∼100% +1155%
Wiko View 2 Pro
975 Points ∼12% +54%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
1480 Points ∼19% +134%
Average Mediatek MT6750S (631 - 633, n=2)
632 Points ∼8% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (18 - 15969, n=481)
1667 Points ∼21% +163%
Memory (sorteer op waarde)
LG Q Stylus
778 Points ∼24%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9
2068 Points ∼64% +166%
Sharp B10
609 Points ∼19% -22%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
3239 Points ∼100% +316%
Wiko View 2 Pro
861 Points ∼27% +11%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
1334 Points ∼41% +71%
Average Mediatek MT6750S (778 - 800, n=2)
789 Points ∼24% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (21 - 6283, n=481)
1197 Points ∼37% +54%
System (sorteer op waarde)
LG Q Stylus
1868 Points ∼29%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9
6137 Points ∼94% +229%
Sharp B10
1077 Points ∼17% -42%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
6506 Points ∼100% +248%
Wiko View 2 Pro
2894 Points ∼44% +55%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
3284 Points ∼50% +76%
Average Mediatek MT6750S (1407 - 1868, n=2)
1638 Points ∼25% -12%
Average of class Smartphone (369 - 12202, n=481)
2422 Points ∼37% +30%
Overall (sorteer op waarde)
LG Q Stylus
882 Points ∼23%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9
3110 Points ∼81% +253%
Sharp B10
253 Points ∼7% -71%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
3838 Points ∼100% +335%
Wiko View 2 Pro
1159 Points ∼30% +31%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
1570 Points ∼41% +78%
Average Mediatek MT6750S (855 - 882, n=2)
869 Points ∼23% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (150 - 6097, n=485)
1212 Points ∼32% +37%

Legende

 
LG Q Stylus Mediatek MT6750S, ARM Mali-T860 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy Note 9 Samsung Exynos 9810, ARM Mali-G72 MP18, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Sharp B10 Mediatek MT6750, ARM Mali-T860 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Qualcomm Adreno 630, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Wiko View 2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Qualcomm Adreno 508, 32 GB eMMC Flash
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 (Chrome 68)
75.959 Points ∼100% +296%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (Chrome 68)
63.012 Points ∼83% +229%
Average of class Smartphone (10.8 - 273, n=403)
36 Points ∼47% +88%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus (Chrome 67)
27.615 Points ∼36% +44%
Wiko View 2 Pro (Chrome 67)
22.257 Points ∼29% +16%
LG Q Stylus (hrome 69)
19.174 Points ∼25%
Average Mediatek MT6750S (18.7 - 19.2, n=2)
18.9 Points ∼25% -1%
Sharp B10 (Chrome 68)
12.743 Points ∼17% -34%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (Chrome 68)
14663 Points ∼100% +322%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 (Chrome 68)
14514 Points ∼99% +318%
Average of class Smartphone (1506 - 43280, n=539)
5398 Points ∼37% +55%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus (Chrome 67)
5017 Points ∼34% +44%
Wiko View 2 Pro (Chrome 67)
4001 Points ∼27% +15%
LG Q Stylus (hrome 69)
3474 Points ∼24%
Average Mediatek MT6750S (3422 - 3474, n=2)
3448 Points ∼24% -1%
Sharp B10 (Chrome 68)
2468 Points ∼17% -29%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Sharp B10 (Chrome 68)
18581 ms * ∼100% -41%
Average Mediatek MT6750S (13203 - 13671, n=2)
13437 ms * ∼72% -2%
LG Q Stylus (hrome 69)
13202.5 ms * ∼71%
Average of class Smartphone (603 - 59466, n=558)
11643 ms * ∼63% +12%
Wiko View 2 Pro (Chrome 67)
11455.8 ms * ∼62% +13%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus (Chrome 67)
10086 ms * ∼54% +24%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 (Chrome 68)
2713.6 ms * ∼15% +79%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (Chrome 68)
2710 ms * ∼15% +79%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (Chrome 68)
72 Points ∼100% +188%
Average of class Smartphone (25 - 161, n=48)
61.3 Points ∼85% +145%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus (Chrome 67)
37 Points ∼51% +48%
LG Q Stylus (Chrome 69)
25 Points ∼35%
Average Mediatek MT6750S (19 - 25, n=2)
22 Points ∼31% -12%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 (Chrome 68)
223 Points ∼100% +214%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (Chrome 68)
202 Points ∼91% +185%
Average of class Smartphone (27 - 362, n=270)
108 Points ∼48% +52%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus (Chrome 67)
106 Points ∼48% +49%
LG Q Stylus (hrome 69)
71 Points ∼32%
Average Mediatek MT6750S (70 - 71, n=2)
70.5 Points ∼32% -1%

* ... kleiner is beter

LG Q StylusSamsung Galaxy Note 9Sharp B10Xiaomi Pocophone F1Wiko View 2 ProSony Xperia XA2 PlusAverage 32 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
115%
-16%
83%
21%
30%
-1%
-9%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
63.55 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
66.7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
5%
6.8 (Kingston 32GB)
-89%
65.58 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
3%
57.83 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-9%
67.02 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
5%
46.8 (3.4 - 87.1, n=109)
-26%
45 (3.4 - 87.1, n=309)
-29%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
83.12 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
77 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-7%
9.83 (Kingston 32GB)
-88%
85.3 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
3%
82.29 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-1%
86.01 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
3%
65.9 (8.2 - 96.5, n=109)
-21%
63.3 (8.2 - 96.5, n=309)
-24%
Random Write 4KB
12.07
21
74%
12.9
7%
17.81
48%
6.72
-44%
10.5
-13%
18.4 (0.75 - 77.3, n=147)
52%
15 (0.14 - 164, n=588)
24%
Random Read 4KB
31.45
134
326%
54.6
74%
101.01
221%
65.63
109%
77.43
146%
36 (3.59 - 117, n=147)
14%
36.8 (1.59 - 173, n=588)
17%
Sequential Write 256KB
121.4
196
61%
100.5
-17%
155.57
28%
194.28
60%
146.16
20%
94.1 (14.8 - 189, n=147)
-22%
77.3 (2.99 - 246, n=588)
-36%
Sequential Read 256KB
241.7
805
233%
280.7
16%
705.38
192%
265.37
10%
281.06
16%
229 (25.8 - 440, n=147)
-5%
223 (12.1 - 895, n=588)
-8%
Asphalt 9: Legends
 InstellingenWaarde
 High Quality16 fps
 Standard / low23 fps
  Your browser does not support the canvas element!
Arena of Valor
 InstellingenWaarde
 min27 fps
 high HD26 fps
  Your browser does not support the canvas element!
Max. Belasting
 30.8 °C30.7 °C33 °C 
 31.3 °C31.7 °C34.1 °C 
 31.8 °C32.1 °C32.8 °C 
Maximum: 34.1 °C
Gemiddelde: 32 °C
30.8 °C30.9 °C31.3 °C
31.7 °C31.9 °C34.4 °C
31.5 °C34.6 °C35.3 °C
Maximum: 35.3 °C
Gemiddelde: 32.5 °C
Stroomadapter (max.)  32.8 °C | Kamertemperatuur 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2034.935.82529.426.43129.223.54023.525.35030.931.16325.424.5802421.210020.821.712519.919.216017.618.120017.715.625015.616.43151720.540016.127.950015.24063014.650.380015.359.2100014.865.5125014.264.7160013.266.7200014.869.925001470.2315013.778.1400014.683.8500014.376.9630014.473.8800014.776.51000014.868.9125001561.81600014.957.6SPL26.787.6N0.856.6median 14.8median 61.8Delta1.421.8303836.136.83233.529.427.931.536.327.924.722.121.52223.821.224.421.529.720.340.118.446.417.354.316.760.91760.616.162.915.865.615.870.415.372.115.874.514.971.91573.114.775.514.774.91572.515.173.11573.615.473.61567.116.347.727.684.7159.3median 15.8median 67.11.913.1hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseLG Q StylusSony Xperia XA2 Plus
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
LG Q Stylus audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 43.2% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 11.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (13.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 13.6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (10.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (41.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 98% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 98% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Sony Xperia XA2 Plus audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 46% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 45% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 68% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Stroomgebruik
Uit / Standbydarklight 0.01 / 0.12 Watt
Inactiefdarkmidlight 0.69 / 1.7 / 1.73 Watt
Belasting midlight 3.21 / 5.31 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
LG Q Stylus
3300 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Note 9
4000 mAh
Sharp B10
4000 mAh
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
4000 mAh
Wiko View 2 Pro
3000 mAh
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
3580 mAh
Average Mediatek MT6750S
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-53%
-42%
-26%
-1%
8%
-7%
-16%
Idle Minimum *
0.69
0.9
-30%
1
-45%
0.65
6%
0.64
7%
0.35
49%
0.845 (0.69 - 1, n=2)
-22%
0.881 (0.2 - 3.4, n=624)
-28%
Idle Average *
1.7
1.9
-12%
1.98
-16%
1.97
-16%
2.07
-22%
1.81
-6%
1.635 (1.57 - 1.7, n=2)
4%
1.722 (0.6 - 6.2, n=623)
-1%
Idle Maximum *
1.73
3.7
-114%
2.5
-45%
2.01
-16%
2.13
-23%
1.83
-6%
1.685 (1.64 - 1.73, n=2)
3%
1.998 (0.74 - 6.6, n=624)
-15%
Load Average *
3.21
5.3
-65%
5.3
-65%
4.29
-34%
2.69
16%
3.31
-3%
3.66 (3.21 - 4.1, n=2)
-14%
4.03 (0.8 - 10.8, n=618)
-26%
Load Maximum *
5.31
7.6
-43%
7.4
-39%
9.05
-70%
4.46
16%
4.97
6%
5.67 (5.31 - 6.02, n=2)
-7%
5.72 (1.2 - 14.2, n=618)
-8%

* ... kleiner is beter

Batterijduur
Inactief (zonder WLAN, minimale helderheid)
25h 29min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
6h 59min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
8h 47min
Belast (maximale helderheid)
3h 20min
LG Q Stylus
3300 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Note 9
4000 mAh
Sharp B10
4000 mAh
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
4000 mAh
Wiko View 2 Pro
3000 mAh
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
3580 mAh
Batterijduur
62%
116%
55%
105%
135%
Reader / Idle
1529
1687
10%
2088
37%
4682
206%
H.264
527
896
70%
936
78%
893
69%
WiFi v1.3
419
794
89%
903
116%
808
93%
857
105%
837
100%
Load
200
354
77%
220
10%
529
165%

Pro

+ stylus opgeborgen in de behuizing
+ schok-, water- en stofbestendig
+ lichtgewicht
+ goede bruikbaarheid

Contra

- batterijduur
- USB 2.0
- geen ac Wi-Fi
- achterzijde krast makkelijk
Review: LG Q Stylus. Test unit provided by LG Germany
Review: LG Q Stylus. Test unit provided by LG Germany

Dit is de verkorte versie van het originele artikel. Het volledige, Engelse testrapport vind je hier.

De LG Q Stylus presenteert zichzelf als een stevige smartphone voor alledaags gebruik. De smartphone heeft goede prestaties en kan wat meer aan dan basis WhatsApp-en en browsen. De meegeleverde Stylus geeft dit apparaat in deze prijsklasse een unieke feature.

De LG Q Stylus is met zijn stylus in deze prijsklasse uniek. De prestaties zijn goed, maar de batterijduur had beter kunnen zijn.

Potentiële kopers moeten zich bewust zijn van de matige batterijduur, die een stuk korter is dan concurrerende smartphones. De camera's zijn goed genoeg voor zo nu en dan een kiekje, maar meer ook niet. De Q Stylus kan gebruikt worden om te gamen, al moeten gebruikers niet te hoge verwachtingen hebben. De laadtijden kunnen erg lang zijn en de framerates kunnen erg laag zijn in de veeleisender games.

LG Q Stylus - 26-10-2018 v6
Mike Wobker

Behuizing
87%
Toetsenbord
69 / 75 → 91%
Aanwijsapparaat
87%
Aansluitmogelijkheden
39 / 60 → 64%
Gewicht
90%
Batterij
90%
Beeldscherm
85%
Gaming-performance
15 / 63 → 23%
Applicatie-performance
40 / 70 → 57%
Temperatuur
94%
Luidheid
100%
Audio
65 / 91 → 71%
Camera
63%
Gemiddelde
71%
80%
Smartphone - Gewogen Gemiddelde

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Overzichten en testrapporten over laptops en mobieltjes > Testrapporten > Kort testrapport LG Q Stylus Smartphone
Mike Wobker, 2018-11- 1 (Update: 2018-11- 1)