Notebookcheck

Kort testrapport Huawei P Smart (2019) Smartphone

Mike Wobker, 👁 Daniel Schmidt, 30-12-2018

Groter. Slimmer. Sneller. Met deze drie woorden kan de nieuwe smartphone van Huawei, de P Smart 2019, omschreven worden. De prestaties zijn aanzienlijk verbeterd en de smartphone draait op de nieuwste versie van Android (9.0 Pie). In ons testrapport vinden we echter enkele nadelen die we ook al in de voorganger vonden.

Huawei P Smart 2019 (P Serie)
Processor
HiSilicon Kirin 710
Grafische kaart
ARM Mali-G51 MP4
Geheugen
3072 MB 
Beeldscherm
6.2 inch 19.5:9, 2340 x 1080 pixel 416 PPI, capacitief, IPS, glimmend: ja
Opslag
64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 GB 
, 55 GB beschikbaar
Verbindingen
1 USB 2.0, Audio Verbindingen: 3.5-mm audio, Card Reader: microSD (FAT, FAT32, exFAT, max. 512 GB), 1 Vingerafdruklezer, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensoren: versnellingssensor, nabijheidssensor, kompas
Netwerkmogelijkheden
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.2, GSM (B2 / B3 / B5 / B8), UMTS 3G (B1 / B2 / B5 / B8), LTE 4G FDD (B1 / B3 / B7 / B8 / B20), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Afmetingen
hoogte x breedte x diepte (in mm): 7.95 x 155.2 x 73.4
Batterij
3400 mAh Lithium-Polymer, Gesprekstijd 2G (volgens fabrikant): 43 h, Gesprekstijd 3G (volgens fabrikant): 25 h, Standby 2G (volgens fabrikant): 738 h, Standby 3G (volgens fabrikant): 800 h
Besturingssysteem
Android 9.0 Pie
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix +2 MP, LED flits
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix
Bijkomende functionaliteiten
Luidsprekers: 1, Toetsenbord: virtueel, Toetsenbordverlichting: ja, USB stroomadapter, microUSB-kabel, SIM-tool, stereo headset, EMUI 9.0, 24 Maanden Garantie, hoofd SAR: 0.83 W/Kg, lichaam SAR: 1.00 W/Kg, fanless
Gewicht
160 g, Voeding: 39 g
Prijs
250 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Huawei P Smart 2019
Huawei P Smart 2019
Huawei P Smart 2019
Huawei P Smart 2019
Huawei P Smart 2019
Huawei P Smart 2019
Huawei P Smart 2019

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Nokia 5.1 Plus
Mali-G72 MP3, Helio P60, 32 GB eMMC Flash
337 (min: 318, max: 347) MBit/s ∼100% +105%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Mali-G71 MP2, 7885, 64 GB eMMC Flash
279 (min: 265, max: 284) MBit/s ∼83% +70%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 939, n=320)
215 MBit/s ∼64% +31%
Honor 8X
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 128 GB eMMC Flash
207 (min: 162, max: 243) MBit/s ∼61% +26%
Huawei P Smart 2019
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
164 (min: 28, max: 206) MBit/s ∼49%
Motorola One
Adreno 506, 625, 64 GB eMMC Flash
103 (min: 36, max: 118) MBit/s ∼31% -37%
Huawei P smart
Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 659, 32 GB eMMC Flash
51.7 MBit/s ∼15% -68%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Mali-G71 MP2, 7885, 64 GB eMMC Flash
320 (min: 164, max: 362) MBit/s ∼100% +42%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
Mali-G72 MP3, Helio P60, 32 GB eMMC Flash
312 (min: 121, max: 348) MBit/s ∼98% +38%
Huawei P Smart 2019
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
226 (min: 197, max: 262) MBit/s ∼71%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 703, n=320)
210 MBit/s ∼66% -7%
Honor 8X
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 128 GB eMMC Flash
182 (min: 136, max: 231) MBit/s ∼57% -19%
Motorola One
Adreno 506, 625, 64 GB eMMC Flash
112 (min: 57, max: 117) MBit/s ∼35% -50%
Huawei P smart
Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 659, 32 GB eMMC Flash
50.3 MBit/s ∼16% -78%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø164 (28-206)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø226 (197-262)
GPS Huawei P Smart
GPS Huawei P Smart
GPS Huawei P Smart
GPS Huawei P Smart
GPS Huawei P Smart
GPS Huawei P Smart
GPS Garmin Edge 520
GPS Garmin Edge 520
GPS Garmin Edge 520
GPS Garmin Edge 520
GPS Garmin Edge 520
GPS Garmin Edge 520

Beeldvergelijking

Bekijk een scène en navigeer binnen het eerste beeld. Eén klik wijzigt het zoomniveau. Eén klik op het ingezoomde beeld opent het origineel in een nieuw venster. Het eerste beeld toont de verschaalde foto van het testtoestel.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
klik om beelden te laden
Huawei P Smart 2019 - Test chart
Huawei P Smart 2019 - Test chart (Detail)
407
cd/m²
436
cd/m²
454
cd/m²
408
cd/m²
458
cd/m²
461
cd/m²
423
cd/m²
439
cd/m²
478
cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 478 cd/m² Gemiddelde: 440.4 cd/m² Minimum: 1.98 cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling: 85 %
Helderheid in Batterij-modus: 458 cd/m²
Contrast: 1309:1 (Zwart: 0.35 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.4 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.2
ΔE Greyscale 2.4 | 0.64-98 Ø6.4
98% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.22
Huawei P Smart 2019
IPS, 2340x1080, 6.2
Huawei P smart
IPS, 2160x1080, 5.65
Nokia 5.1 Plus
IPS, 1520x720, 5.8
Honor 8X
LCD IPS, 2340x1080, 6.5
Motorola One
IPS, 1520x720, 5.9
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Super AMOLED, 2220x1080, 6
Screen
-51%
-58%
-111%
-62%
18%
Brightness middle
458
573
25%
513
12%
484
6%
467
2%
570
24%
Brightness
440
568
29%
502
14%
469
7%
452
3%
565
28%
Brightness Distribution
85
89
5%
89
5%
93
9%
87
2%
93
9%
Black Level *
0.35
0.63
-80%
0.36
-3%
0.55
-57%
0.38
-9%
Contrast
1309
910
-30%
1425
9%
880
-33%
1229
-6%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
1.4
4.2
-200%
5.2
-271%
7.3
-421%
5.29
-278%
1.5
-7%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
3.8
6.4
-68%
9.8
-158%
11.1
-192%
7.71
-103%
3.6
5%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
2.4
4.6
-92%
4.1
-71%
7.4
-208%
5
-108%
1.2
50%
Gamma
2.22 99%
2.24 98%
2.33 94%
2.16 102%
2.376 93%
2.07 106%
CCT
6235 104%
7157 91%
7423 88%
8534 76%
7583 86%
6504 100%

* ... kleiner is beter

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Om de schermhelderheid te verlagen schakelen sommige laptops het backlight erg snel aan en uit. Dit gebeurt aan een dergelijk hoge frequentie dat het niet zichtbaar is voor het menselijk oog. Als de frequentie te laag is kunnen personen met gevoelige ogen geïrriteerd geraken, hoofdpijn krijgen en zelfs flickering waarnemen.
Screen flickering / PWM niet waargenomen

Ter vergelijking: 52 % van alle geteste toestellen maakten geen gebruik van PWM om de schermhelderheid te verlagen. Als het wel werd gebruikt, werd een gemiddelde van 9064 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz waargenomen.

Responstijd Scherm

De responstijden van het scherm tonen hoe snel het scherm in staat is om van één kleur naar de andere te veranderen. Trage responstijden kunnen aanleiding geven tot 'nabeelden' rond bewegende objecten of het scherm wazig maken (blur). Vooral spelers van snelle 3D-games hebben baat bij een scherm met snelle responstijden.
       Responstijd Zwart naar Wit
27.2 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd↗ 8.4 ms stijging
↘ 18.8 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde relatief trage responstijden in onze tests en is misschien te traag voor games.
Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.8 (minimum) tot 240 (maximum) ms. » 56 % van alle toestellen zijn beter.
Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd vergelijkbaar is met het gemiddelde (25.6 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.
       Responstijd 50% Grijs naar 80% Grijs
50.8 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd↗ 22.4 ms stijging
↘ 28.4 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde trage responstijden in onze tests en is misschien te traag voor games.
Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.9 (minimum) tot 636 (maximum) ms. » 85 % van alle toestellen zijn beter.
Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd slechter is dan het gemiddelde (41 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.
Geekbench 4.1/4.2
Compute RenderScript Score (sorteer op waarde)
Huawei P Smart 2019
3157 Points ∼70%
Huawei P smart
3117 Points ∼69% -1%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
Points ∼0% -100%
Honor 8X
4083 Points ∼90% +29%
Motorola One
3592 Points ∼80% +14%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
4026 Points ∼89% +28%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (3157 - 4083, n=3)
3716 Points ∼82% +18%
Average of class Smartphone (2461 - 21070, n=213)
4513 Points ∼100% +43%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sorteer op waarde)
Huawei P Smart 2019
5407 Points ∼97%
Huawei P smart
3732 Points ∼67% -31%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
Points ∼0% -100%
Honor 8X
5557 Points ∼100% +3%
Motorola One
4374 Points ∼79% -19%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
4429 Points ∼80% -18%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (5407 - 5615, n=3)
5526 Points ∼99% +2%
Average of class Smartphone (2542 - 11598, n=263)
4337 Points ∼78% -20%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sorteer op waarde)
Huawei P Smart 2019
1527 Points ∼95%
Huawei P smart
946 Points ∼59% -38%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
Points ∼0% -100%
Honor 8X
1614 Points ∼100% +6%
Motorola One
878 Points ∼54% -43%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
1525 Points ∼94% 0%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (1527 - 1614, n=3)
1584 Points ∼98% +4%
Average of class Smartphone (674 - 4824, n=264)
1274 Points ∼79% -17%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sorteer op waarde)
Huawei P Smart 2019
5951 Points ∼83%
Huawei P smart
4874 Points ∼68% -18%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
7021 Points ∼98% +18%
Honor 8X
7141 Points ∼100% +20%
Motorola One
4936 Points ∼69% -17%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
5387 Points ∼75% -9%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (5951 - 7141, n=3)
4364 Points ∼61% -27%
Average of class Smartphone (3146 - 9868, n=272)
4623 Points ∼65% -22%
Work performance score (sorteer op waarde)
Huawei P Smart 2019
7078 Points ∼78%
Huawei P smart
5817 Points ∼64% -18%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
9065 Points ∼100% +28%
Honor 8X
8939 Points ∼99% +26%
Motorola One
5927 Points ∼65% -16%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
5625 Points ∼62% -21%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (7078 - 8939, n=3)
8181 Points ∼90% +16%
Average of class Smartphone (4009 - 13531, n=440)
5040 Points ∼56% -29%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Huawei P Smart 2019
2085 Points ∼77%
Huawei P smart
1688 Points ∼62% -19%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
2377 Points ∼88% +14%
Honor 8X
2702 Points ∼100% +30%
Motorola One
2027 Points ∼75% -3%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
1845 Points ∼68% -12%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (1851 - 2702, n=4)
2334 Points ∼86% +12%
Average of class Smartphone (1167 - 4439, n=292)
1731 Points ∼64% -17%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Huawei P Smart 2019
838 Points ∼57%
Huawei P smart
401 Points ∼27% -52%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
721 Points ∼49% -14%
Honor 8X
801 Points ∼54% -4%
Motorola One
441 Points ∼30% -47%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
629 Points ∼43% -25%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (470 - 838, n=4)
728 Points ∼49% -13%
Average of class Smartphone (305 - 8206, n=292)
1478 Points ∼100% +76%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sorteer op waarde)
Huawei P Smart 2019
966 Points ∼70%
Huawei P smart
483 Points ∼35% -50%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
853 Points ∼62% -12%
Honor 8X
950 Points ∼69% -2%
Motorola One
534 Points ∼39% -45%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
737 Points ∼54% -24%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (563 - 966, n=4)
858 Points ∼62% -11%
Average of class Smartphone (365 - 5200, n=295)
1374 Points ∼100% +42%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Huawei P Smart 2019
2459 Points ∼91%
Huawei P smart
1741 Points ∼65% -29%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
2388 Points ∼89% -3%
Honor 8X
2697 Points ∼100% +10%
Motorola One
2003 Points ∼74% -19%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
1871 Points ∼69% -24%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (1656 - 2697, n=4)
2362 Points ∼88% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (375 - 4493, n=308)
1705 Points ∼63% -31%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Huawei P Smart 2019
1225 Points ∼59%
Huawei P smart
618 Points ∼30% -50%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
1159 Points ∼56% -5%
Honor 8X
1316 Points ∼64% +7%
Motorola One
762 Points ∼37% -38%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
954 Points ∼46% -22%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (740 - 1316, n=4)
1149 Points ∼56% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (131 - 14951, n=308)
2060 Points ∼100% +68%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sorteer op waarde)
Huawei P Smart 2019
1379 Points ∼80%
Huawei P smart
721 Points ∼42% -48%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
1309 Points ∼75% -5%
Honor 8X
1485 Points ∼86% +8%
Motorola One
884 Points ∼51% -36%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
1071 Points ∼62% -22%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (844 - 1485, n=4)
1297 Points ∼75% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (159 - 7856, n=309)
1734 Points ∼100% +26%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Huawei P Smart 2019
2392 Points ∼90%
Huawei P smart
1827 Points ∼69% -24%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
2149 Points ∼81% -10%
Honor 8X
2663 Points ∼100% +11%
Motorola One
2067 Points ∼78% -14%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
1821 Points ∼68% -24%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (1924 - 2663, n=4)
2405 Points ∼90% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (1103 - 4216, n=367)
1665 Points ∼63% -30%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Huawei P Smart 2019
703 Points ∼59%
Huawei P smart
256 Points ∼21% -64%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
657 Points ∼55% -7%
Honor 8X
798 Points ∼66% +14%
Motorola One
397 Points ∼33% -44%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
634 Points ∼53% -10%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (457 - 812, n=4)
693 Points ∼58% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (257 - 5246, n=367)
1201 Points ∼100% +71%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sorteer op waarde)
Huawei P Smart 2019
834 Points ∼73%
Huawei P smart
316 Points ∼27% -62%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
777 Points ∼68% -7%
Honor 8X
945 Points ∼82% +13%
Motorola One
484 Points ∼42% -42%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
741 Points ∼64% -11%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (550 - 960, n=4)
822 Points ∼71% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (310 - 4734, n=375)
1150 Points ∼100% +38%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Huawei P Smart 2019
2381 Points ∼90%
Huawei P smart
1787 Points ∼68% -25%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
2159 Points ∼82% -9%
Honor 8X
2645 Points ∼100% +11%
Motorola One
2091 Points ∼79% -12%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
1829 Points ∼69% -23%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (1907 - 2645, n=4)
2390 Points ∼90% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (532 - 4215, n=400)
1563 Points ∼59% -34%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Huawei P Smart 2019
683 Points ∼42%
Huawei P smart
229 Points ∼14% -66%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
983 Points ∼60% +44%
Honor 8X
1280 Points ∼78% +87%
Motorola One
751 Points ∼46% +10%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
845 Points ∼52% +24%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (568 - 1280, n=4)
952 Points ∼58% +39%
Average of class Smartphone (46 - 8312, n=400)
1639 Points ∼100% +140%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sorteer op waarde)
Huawei P Smart 2019
812 Points ∼56%
Huawei P smart
284 Points ∼20% -65%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
1118 Points ∼77% +38%
Honor 8X
1445 Points ∼100% +78%
Motorola One
876 Points ∼61% +8%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
960 Points ∼66% +18%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (673 - 1445, n=4)
1093 Points ∼76% +35%
Average of class Smartphone (58 - 6454, n=408)
1398 Points ∼97% +72%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Huawei P Smart 2019
11212 Points ∼62%
Huawei P smart
14930 Points ∼83% +33%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
18065 Points ∼100% +61%
Honor 8X
17450 Points ∼97% +56%
Motorola One
15762 Points ∼87% +41%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
13914 Points ∼77% +24%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (11158 - 17598, n=4)
14355 Points ∼79% +28%
Average of class Smartphone (3958 - 37475, n=556)
12996 Points ∼72% +16%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sorteer op waarde)
Huawei P Smart 2019
19510 Points ∼91%
Huawei P smart
11262 Points ∼52% -42%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
16820 Points ∼78% -14%
Honor 8X
21533 Points ∼100% +10%
Motorola One
13382 Points ∼62% -31%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
15567 Points ∼72% -20%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (12426 - 21533, n=4)
18734 Points ∼87% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (1152 - 162695, n=556)
18184 Points ∼84% -7%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sorteer op waarde)
Huawei P Smart 2019
16754 Points ∼82%
Huawei P smart
11912 Points ∼58% -29%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
17082 Points ∼83% +2%
Honor 8X
20468 Points ∼100% +22%
Motorola One
13847 Points ∼68% -17%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
15167 Points ∼74% -9%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (12120 - 20468, n=4)
17452 Points ∼85% +4%
Average of class Smartphone (2915 - 77599, n=557)
15306 Points ∼75% -9%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sorteer op waarde)
Huawei P Smart 2019
39 fps ∼100%
Huawei P smart
19 fps ∼49% -51%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
30 fps ∼77% -23%
Honor 8X
39 fps ∼100% 0%
Motorola One
23 fps ∼59% -41%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (39 - 39, n=3)
39 fps ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (4.1 - 251, n=581)
31.8 fps ∼82% -18%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sorteer op waarde)
Huawei P Smart 2019
36 fps ∼90%
Huawei P smart
18 fps ∼45% -50%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
40 fps ∼100% +11%
Honor 8X
36 fps ∼90% 0%
Motorola One
35 fps ∼88% -3%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (36 - 36, n=3)
36 fps ∼90% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (6.9 - 120, n=584)
25.2 fps ∼63% -30%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sorteer op waarde)
Huawei P Smart 2019
21 fps ∼100%
Huawei P smart
8.7 fps ∼41% -59%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
16 fps ∼76% -24%
Honor 8X
21 fps ∼100% 0%
Motorola One
9.9 fps ∼47% -53%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (21 - 21, n=3)
21 fps ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (2.2 - 132, n=503)
17.1 fps ∼81% -19%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sorteer op waarde)
Huawei P Smart 2019
19 fps ∼66%
Huawei P smart
8.3 fps ∼29% -56%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
29 fps ∼100% +53%
Honor 8X
19 fps ∼66% 0%
Motorola One
19 fps ∼66% 0%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (19 - 19, n=3)
19 fps ∼66% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (4.1 - 115, n=506)
16.3 fps ∼56% -14%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Huawei P Smart 2019
14 fps ∼96%
Huawei P smart
5.3 fps ∼36% -62%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
9.6 fps ∼66% -31%
Honor 8X
14 fps ∼96% 0%
Motorola One
14 fps ∼96% 0%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (14 - 14, n=3)
14 fps ∼96% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (2.5 - 88, n=364)
14.6 fps ∼100% +4%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Huawei P Smart 2019
13 fps ∼65%
Huawei P smart
5.2 fps ∼26% -60%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
20 fps ∼100% +54%
Honor 8X
13 fps ∼65% 0%
Motorola One
6.5 fps ∼33% -50%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (13 - 13, n=3)
13 fps ∼65% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (6.3 - 110, n=367)
14.2 fps ∼71% +9%
GFXBench
High Tier Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Huawei P Smart 2019
4.1 fps ∼42%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
6.4 fps ∼65% +56%
Honor 8X
4.1 fps ∼42% 0%
Motorola One
4 fps ∼41% -2%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (4.1 - 7, n=3)
5.07 fps ∼51% +24%
Average of class Smartphone (1.4 - 59, n=75)
9.86 fps ∼100% +140%
2560x1440 High Tier Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Huawei P Smart 2019
2.6 fps ∼40%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
2.1 fps ∼33% -19%
Honor 8X
2.6 fps ∼40% 0%
Motorola One
1.2 fps ∼19% -54%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (2.6 - 3.1, n=3)
2.77 fps ∼43% +7%
Average of class Smartphone (0.88 - 31, n=75)
6.46 fps ∼100% +148%
Normal Tier Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Huawei P Smart 2019
6.4 fps ∼44%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
8.6 fps ∼60% +34%
Honor 8X
5.2 fps ∼36% -19%
Motorola One
6.5 fps ∼45% +2%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (4.6 - 6.4, n=3)
5.4 fps ∼38% -16%
Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 59, n=75)
14.4 fps ∼100% +125%
1920x1080 Normal Tier Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Huawei P Smart 2019
7 fps ∼45%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
6.2 fps ∼40% -11%
Honor 8X
4.6 fps ∼30% -34%
Motorola One
3.6 fps ∼23% -49%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (4.6 - 7, n=3)
5.57 fps ∼36% -20%
Average of class Smartphone (2.6 - 63, n=74)
15.4 fps ∼100% +120%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Huawei P Smart 2019
7.7 fps ∼77%
Huawei P smart
3.2 fps ∼32% -58%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
5.8 fps ∼58% -25%
Honor 8X
7.6 fps ∼76% -1%
Motorola One
3.6 fps ∼36% -53%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (7.6 - 7.7, n=3)
7.63 fps ∼77% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (2.6 - 54, n=295)
9.96 fps ∼100% +29%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Huawei P Smart 2019
6.8 fps ∼75%
Huawei P smart
2.9 fps ∼32% -57%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
7.4 fps ∼82% +9%
Honor 8X
6.4 fps ∼71% -6%
Motorola One
7.3 fps ∼81% +7%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (6.4 - 6.8, n=3)
6.67 fps ∼74% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (3.8 - 58, n=298)
9.04 fps ∼100% +33%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sorteer op waarde)
Huawei P Smart 2019
130070 Points ∼93%
Huawei P smart
87688 Points ∼63% -33%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
119367 Points ∼85% -8%
Honor 8X
140188 Points ∼100% +8%
Motorola One
65759 Points ∼47% -49%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
122826 Points ∼88% -6%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (130070 - 140188, n=3)
136436 Points ∼97% +5%
Average of class Smartphone (17073 - 348178, n=187)
119677 Points ∼85% -8%
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sorteer op waarde)
Huawei P Smart 2019
104012 Points ∼92%
Huawei P smart
66353 Points ∼59% -36%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
91667 Points ∼81% -12%
Honor 8X
112870 Points ∼100% +9%
Motorola One
66291 Points ∼59% -36%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
87728 Points ∼78% -16%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (104012 - 112870, n=3)
109395 Points ∼97% +5%
Average of class Smartphone (23275 - 254229, n=403)
77457 Points ∼69% -26%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sorteer op waarde)
Huawei P Smart 2019
982 Points ∼81%
Huawei P smart
919 Points ∼76% -6%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
1083 Points ∼90% +10%
Honor 8X
1207 Points ∼100% +23%
Motorola One
860 Points ∼71% -12%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
1090 Points ∼90% +11%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (982 - 1208, n=3)
1132 Points ∼94% +15%
Average of class Smartphone (7 - 1731, n=515)
700 Points ∼58% -29%
Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Huawei P Smart 2019
1469 Points ∼84%
Huawei P smart
857 Points ∼49% -42%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
1262 Points ∼72% -14%
Honor 8X
1456 Points ∼83% -1%
Motorola One
1019 Points ∼58% -31%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
1356 Points ∼77% -8%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (1450 - 1469, n=3)
1458 Points ∼83% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (18 - 15969, n=515)
1756 Points ∼100% +20%
Memory (sorteer op waarde)
Huawei P Smart 2019
2972 Points ∼68%
Huawei P smart
1889 Points ∼43% -36%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
2150 Points ∼49% -28%
Honor 8X
4360 Points ∼100% +47%
Motorola One
1235 Points ∼28% -58%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
2445 Points ∼56% -18%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (2972 - 4360, n=3)
3613 Points ∼83% +22%
Average of class Smartphone (21 - 6283, n=515)
1275 Points ∼29% -57%
System (sorteer op waarde)
Huawei P Smart 2019
5074 Points ∼92%
Huawei P smart
3223 Points ∼58% -36%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
3817 Points ∼69% -25%
Honor 8X
5529 Points ∼100% +9%
Motorola One
3176 Points ∼57% -37%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
4506 Points ∼81% -11%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (5074 - 5556, n=3)
5386 Points ∼97% +6%
Average of class Smartphone (369 - 12202, n=515)
2562 Points ∼46% -50%
Overall (sorteer op waarde)
Huawei P Smart 2019
2159 Points ∼90%
Huawei P smart
1480 Points ∼61% -31%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
1830 Points ∼76% -15%
Honor 8X
2410 Points ∼100% +12%
Motorola One
1362 Points ∼57% -37%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
2009 Points ∼83% -7%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (2159 - 2417, n=3)
2329 Points ∼97% +8%
Average of class Smartphone (150 - 6097, n=519)
1273 Points ∼53% -41%

Legende

 
Huawei P Smart 2019 HiSilicon Kirin 710, ARM Mali-G51 MP4, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei P smart HiSilicon Kirin 659, ARM Mali-T830 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Nokia 5.1 Plus Mediatek Helio P60, ARM Mali-G72 MP3, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Honor 8X HiSilicon Kirin 710, ARM Mali-G51 MP4, 128 GB eMMC Flash
 
Motorola One Qualcomm Snapdragon 625, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Samsung Exynos 7885, ARM Mali-G71 MP2, 64 GB eMMC Flash
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
Huawei P Smart 2019 (Chrome 70)
49.673 Points ∼100%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (47 - 49.7, n=3)
48 Points ∼97% -3%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 (Chrome 70)
47.986 Points ∼97% -3%
Honor 8X (Chrome 70)
47.012 Points ∼95% -5%
Nokia 5.1 Plus (Chrome 71)
41.675 Points ∼84% -16%
Average of class Smartphone (10.8 - 273, n=439)
37 Points ∼74% -26%
Huawei P smart (Chrome 64)
26.63 Points ∼54% -46%
Motorola One (Chrome 69)
21.317 Points ∼43% -57%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Huawei P Smart 2019 (Chrome 70)
9708 Points ∼100%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (9041 - 9708, n=3)
9281 Points ∼96% -4%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 (Chrome 70)
9165 Points ∼94% -6%
Honor 8X (Chrome 70)
9095 Points ∼94% -6%
Nokia 5.1 Plus (Chrome 71)
8744 Points ∼90% -10%
Average of class Smartphone (1506 - 43280, n=575)
5654 Points ∼58% -42%
Huawei P smart (Chrome 64)
4497 Points ∼46% -54%
Motorola One (Chrome 69)
3781 Points ∼39% -61%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Motorola One (Chrome 69)
12194 ms * ∼100% -205%
Average of class Smartphone (603 - 59466, n=595)
11377 ms * ∼93% -185%
Huawei P smart (Chrome 64)
9698.2 ms * ∼80% -143%
Nokia 5.1 Plus (Chrome 71)
4611.2 ms * ∼38% -15%
Honor 8X
4247.7 ms * ∼35% -6%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (3999 - 4248, n=3)
4150 ms * ∼34% -4%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 (Chrome 70)
4122.8 ms * ∼34% -3%
Huawei P Smart 2019 (Chrome 70)
3998.8 ms * ∼33%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Huawei P Smart 2019 (Chrome 70)
69 Points ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone (25 - 161, n=69)
63.7 Points ∼92% -8%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (58 - 69, n=3)
62 Points ∼90% -10%
Honor 8X (Chrome 70)
58 Points ∼84% -16%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 (Chrome 70)
57 Points ∼83% -17%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
49 Points ∼71% -29%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
Huawei P Smart 2019 (Chrome 70)
169 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 (Chrome 70)
168 Points ∼99% -1%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (147 - 169, n=3)
155 Points ∼92% -8%
Honor 8X (Chrome 70)
147 Points ∼87% -13%
Nokia 5.1 Plus (Chrme 71)
139 Points ∼82% -18%
Motorola One (Chrome 69)
113 Points ∼67% -33%
Average of class Smartphone (77 - 362, n=290)
113 Points ∼67% -33%
Huawei P smart (Chrome 64)
92 Points ∼54% -46%

* ... kleiner is beter

Huawei P Smart 2019Huawei P smartNokia 5.1 PlusHonor 8XMotorola OneSamsung Galaxy A7 2018 Average 64 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-9%
-9%
-3%
7%
-6%
-17%
-35%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
66.92 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
72.36 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
8%
59.56 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-11%
68.12 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
2%
60.9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-9%
64.39 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-4%
55.1 (14.1 - 74.7, n=76)
-18%
46.3 (3.4 - 87.1, n=331)
-31%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
76.17 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
82.26 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
8%
76.56 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
1%
75.24 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-1%
80.8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
6%
78.15 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
3%
73.3 (21.1 - 87.2, n=76)
-4%
64.5 (8.2 - 96.5, n=331)
-15%
Random Write 4KB
70.7
21.3
-70%
25.65
-64%
59.87
-15%
69.1
-2%
15.45
-78%
20.1 (3.4 - 87.1, n=85)
-72%
17 (0.14 - 250, n=623)
-76%
Random Read 4KB
45.66
66.11
45%
77.72
70%
49.54
8%
61.9
36%
83.98
84%
50.4 (11.4 - 149, n=85)
10%
39.5 (1.59 - 173, n=623)
-13%
Sequential Write 256KB
191.4
121.07
-37%
88.92
-54%
169.98
-11%
214.9
12%
104.87
-45%
167 (40 - 246, n=85)
-13%
82.3 (2.99 - 253, n=623)
-57%
Sequential Read 256KB
288.27
269.36
-7%
301.56
5%
283.87
-2%
280.2
-3%
295.76
3%
270 (115 - 704, n=85)
-6%
235 (12.1 - 912, n=623)
-18%
Arena of Valor
010203040Tooltip
; min: Ø30.9 (29-32)
; high HD: Ø30.7 (29-32)
Asphalt 9: Legends
010203040Tooltip
; High Quality: Ø29.7 (27-31)
; Standard / low: Ø29.8 (27-31)
Max. Belasting
 35.4 °C35.5 °C35.3 °C 
 34.5 °C34.9 °C35 °C 
 33.3 °C32.6 °C34.6 °C 
Maximum: 35.5 °C
Gemiddelde: 34.6 °C
31.8 °C33.1 °C35.6 °C
30.4 °C31.8 °C36 °C
30.4 °C32.6 °C35.2 °C
Maximum: 36 °C
Gemiddelde: 33 °C
Stroomadapter (max.)  29.8 °C | Kamertemperatuur 22 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 34.6 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 33.1 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35.5 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 35.6 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 36 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 34.2 °C / 94 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.9 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 33.1 °C / 92 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2032.830.52524.328.83118.625.84024.325.85033.830.26321.231.68024.829.310018.523.912516.423.616017.138.120017.940.725016.845.831514.947.940015.155.750014.257.963013.963.580014.867.5100014.270125014.770.1160014.468.8200014.37025001473.3315013.876.9400014.882.7500014.478.863001571.2800014.766.11000014.860.91250014.853.91600014.746.5SPL26.787N0.859.4median 14.8median 63.5Delta0.611.130.733.82528.726.828.426.328.729.838.227.424.72123.219.525.818.825.719.240.417.641.316.947.415.855.51556.71562.814.766.914.86814.666.514.369.213.471.814.472.514.473.214.876.61577.714.875.314.774.31575.314.972.815.264.515.755.126.885.50.961.4median 15median 66.91.210.8hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseHuawei P Smart 2019Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Huawei P Smart 2019 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 10% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (26.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 64% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 78% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 16% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.2% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 27% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 63% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 56% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 37% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Stroomgebruik
Uit / Standbydarklight 0 / 0.03 Watt
Inactiefdarkmidlight 0.84 / 2.21 / 2.23 Watt
Belasting midlight 4.2 / 7.86 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Huawei P Smart 2019
3400 mAh
Huawei P smart
3000 mAh
Nokia 5.1 Plus
3060 mAh
Honor 8X
3750 mAh
Motorola One
3000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
3300 mAh
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
15%
27%
0%
15%
13%
0%
12%
Idle Minimum *
0.84
0.62
26%
0.56
33%
0.92
-10%
1
-19%
0.71
15%
0.923 (0.84 - 1.01, n=3)
-10%
0.878 (0.2 - 3.4, n=653)
-5%
Idle Average *
2.21
1.76
20%
1.72
22%
2.3
-4%
1.6
28%
1.36
38%
2.24 (2.21 - 2.3, n=3)
-1%
1.724 (0.6 - 6.2, n=652)
22%
Idle Maximum *
2.23
1.87
16%
1.76
21%
2.32
-4%
2
10%
1.47
34%
2.26 (2.23 - 2.32, n=3)
-1%
1.999 (0.74 - 6.6, n=653)
10%
Load Average *
4.2
4.47
-6%
3.11
26%
4.37
-4%
3.3
21%
5.13
-22%
4.21 (4.06 - 4.37, n=3)
-0%
4.04 (0.8 - 10.8, n=647)
4%
Load Maximum *
7.86
6.39
19%
5.2
34%
6.13
22%
5.1
35%
7.89
-0%
6.77 (6.13 - 7.86, n=3)
14%
5.77 (1.2 - 14.2, n=647)
27%

* ... kleiner is beter

Batterijduur
Inactief (zonder WLAN, minimale helderheid)
21h 33min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
8h 26min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
7h 44min
Belast (maximale helderheid)
4h 17min
Huawei P Smart 2019
3400 mAh
Huawei P smart
3000 mAh
Honor 8X
3750 mAh
Motorola One
3000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
3300 mAh
Batterijduur
0%
68%
36%
30%
Reader / Idle
1293
985
-24%
1652
28%
1467
13%
H.264
464
615
33%
769
66%
836
80%
WiFi v1.3
506
565
12%
852
68%
735
45%
605
20%
Load
257
202
-21%
268
4%
273
6%

Pro

+ fatsoenlijke systeemprestaties
+ up-to-date Android Pie
+ dunne beeldschermranden
+ fatsoenlijk beeldscherm

Contra

- geen USB Type-C
- gemiddelde Wi-Fi prestaties
- throttling bij zware belasting
- behuizing gevoelig voor krassen
- matige batterijduur
In review: Huawei P Smart 2019. Review device provided courtesy of: Huawei Germany.
In review: Huawei P Smart 2019. Review device provided courtesy of: Huawei Germany.

Dit is de verkorte versie van het originele artikel. Het volledige, Engelse testrapport vind je hier.

Op het eerste gezicht lijkt de Huawei P Smart (2019) in alle opzichten beter dan zijn voorganger. De smartphone is groter, heeft meer opslagcapaciteit en een krachtiger SoC. En het design is moderner en de beeldschermranden zijn dunner.

Voor een erg lage prijs krijgen kopers van de Huawei P Smart (2019) een krachtige smartphone die voldoet aan de verwachtingen van de meeste mensen.

Kopers kunnen geen miskoop doen met deze € 250 smartphone, maar ze zullen zich nog steeds bewust moeten zijn van de minpunten. De batterijduur is een uur korter dan de voorganger, ondanks dat de P Smart (2019) een grotere batterij heeft. De camera heeft een matige beeldkwaliteit, maar zou goed genoeg moeten zijn voor de meeste foto's. Alledaagse apps en games draaien zonder problemen. De smartphone begint echter te throttlen bij erg veeleisende apps.

Huawei P Smart 2019 - 27-12-2018 v6
Mike Wobker

Behuizing
86%
Toetsenbord
66 / 75 → 88%
Aanwijsapparaat
88%
Aansluitmogelijkheden
43 / 60 → 71%
Gewicht
91%
Batterij
90%
Beeldscherm
90%
Gaming-performance
45 / 63 → 72%
Applicatie-performance
58 / 70 → 83%
Temperatuur
92%
Luidheid
100%
Audio
68 / 91 → 75%
Camera
68%
Gemiddelde
76%
85%
Smartphone - Gewogen Gemiddelde

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Overzichten en testrapporten over laptops en mobieltjes > Testrapporten > Kort testrapport Huawei P Smart (2019) Smartphone
Mike Wobker, 2018-12-30 (Update: 2018-12-30)