Notebookcheck

Kort testrapport Dell G5 15 5590 Laptop: 15-inch gaming-notebook met een Max-Q GPU

Florian Glaser, 👁 Florian Glaser, Felicitas Krohn (vertaald door Siemon Boes), 01-11-2019

Veel beter dan het instapmodel. We hebben recentelijk een versie van de Dell G5 15 5590 met Core i5-9300H en een Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 getest. Nu is het de beurt aan een duurdere variant met Core i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q... en een prijskaartje van 2000 euro. Lees ons testrapport om te achterhalen of het zinvol is om 1000 euro extra uit te geven.

Dell G5 15 5590-P8RVW (G5 15 5590 Serie)
Processor
Intel Core i7-9750H
Grafische kaart
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q - 8192 MB, Core: 885 MHz, Geheugen: 6000 MHz, GDDR6, ForceWare 431.22, Optimus
Geheugen
16384 MB 
, 2x 8 GB SO-DIMM DDR4-2666, dual-channel, alle sleuven bezet, max. 32 GB
Beeldscherm
15.6 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, AU Optronics B156HAN (AUO80ED), IPS, Full HD, 144 Hz, glimmend: nee
Moederbord
Intel HM370
Opslag
SK Hynix BC501 HFM512GDJTNG, 512 GB 
, NVMe-SSD + TOSHIBA MQ04ABF100, 1TB HDD, 5400 rpm. Sleuven: 1x M.2 & 1x 2.5-inch
Geluidskaart
Realtek ALC236 @ Intel Cannon Lake PCH - cAVS (Audio, Voice, Speech)
Verbindingen
3 USB 3.0, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, Audio Verbindingen: 3.5-mm-klink, Card Reader: SD,SDHC,SDXC, 1 Vingerafdruklezer, Noble Lock
Netwerkmogelijkheden
Killer E2500 Gigabit Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000/2500/5000MBit/s), Intel Wireless-AC 9560 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5
Afmetingen
hoogte x breedte x diepte (in mm): 23.7 x 364 x 273
Batterij
90 Wh Lithium-Ion, 6 cellen
Besturingssysteem
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: HD
Bijkomende functionaliteiten
Luidsprekers: 2.0, Toetsenbord: chiclet-style, Toetsenbordverlichting: ja, 180-Watt-voeding, Command Center, 12 Maanden Garantie
Gewicht
2.755 kg, Voeding: 602 g
Prijs
2000 EUR
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

EvaluatieDatumModelGewichtHoogteFormaatResolutieBest Price
83%11-2019Dell G5 15 5590-P8RVW
9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
2.8 kg23.7 mm15.6"1920x1080
85%08-2019Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
2.1 kg18 mm15.6"1920x1080
85%05-2019Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
2.1 kg19 mm15.6"1920x1080
82%09-2019HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl
9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
2.4 kg19.8 mm15.6"1920x1080
83%05-2019Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop)
2.1 kg19 mm15.6"1920x1080

Formaat Vergelijking

364 mm 273 mm 23.7 mm 2.8 kg362.2 mm 261.6 mm 19.8 mm 2.4 kg360 mm 252 mm 19 mm 2.1 kg359 mm 255 mm 18 mm 2.1 kg356 mm 250 mm 19 mm 2.1 kg
SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
197 MB/s ∼100% +757%
Average of class Gaming
  (11.7 - 206, n=258)
91.9 MB/s ∼47% +300%
Dell G5 15 5590-P8RVW
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
23 MB/s ∼12%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
242 MB/s ∼100% +796%
Average of class Gaming
  (13.4 - 257, n=256)
110 MB/s ∼45% +307%
Dell G5 15 5590-P8RVW
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
27 MB/s ∼11%
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
696 MBit/s ∼100% +1%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)
694 MBit/s ∼100% 0%
Dell G5 15 5590-P8RVW
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
692 MBit/s ∼99%
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
688 MBit/s ∼99% -1%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
680 MBit/s ∼98% -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (141 - 702, n=280)
606 MBit/s ∼87% -12%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
683 MBit/s ∼100% +2%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
678 MBit/s ∼99% +1%
Dell G5 15 5590-P8RVW
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
670 MBit/s ∼98%
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
654 MBit/s ∼96% -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (144 - 749, n=280)
559 MBit/s ∼82% -17%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)
554 MBit/s ∼81% -17%
287
cd/m²
315
cd/m²
305
cd/m²
261
cd/m²
291
cd/m²
279
cd/m²
300
cd/m²
311
cd/m²
305
cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling
AU Optronics B156HAN (AUO80ED)
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 315 cd/m² Gemiddelde: 294.9 cd/m² Minimum: 14 cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling: 83 %
Helderheid in Batterij-modus: 291 cd/m²
Contrast: 1323:1 (Zwart: 0.22 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.95 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6, calibrated: 2.05
ΔE Greyscale 3.82 | 0.64-98 Ø6.2
91% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 59% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.49
Dell G5 15 5590-P8RVW
AU Optronics B156HAN (AUO80ED), IPS, 1920x1080
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
NV156FHM-N4K (BOE082A), IPS, 1920x1080
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
Sharp LQ156M1JW03 (SHP14C5), IGZO, 1920x1080
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl
AU Optronics AUO82ED, IPS, 1920x1080
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
AU Optronics B156HAN08.2 (AUO82ED), IPS, 1920x1080
Response Times
40%
10%
12%
44%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
16.4 (8.4, 8)
5.2 (2.6, 2.6)
68%
15.2 (7.6, 7.6)
7%
15.2 (7.6, 7.6)
7%
7.2 (3.8, 3.4)
56%
Response Time Black / White *
12.8 (7.6, 5.2)
11.2 (6.8, 4.4)
12%
11.2 (6.8, 4.4)
12%
10.8 (6, 4.8)
16%
8.8 (4.4, 4.4)
31%
PWM Frequency
23580 (24)
Screen
6%
3%
-12%
1%
Brightness middle
291
288
-1%
266
-9%
324.8
12%
286
-2%
Brightness
295
265
-10%
248
-16%
316
7%
275
-7%
Brightness Distribution
83
84
1%
89
7%
84
1%
90
8%
Black Level *
0.22
0.22
-0%
0.31
-41%
0.26
-18%
0.37
-68%
Contrast
1323
1309
-1%
858
-35%
1249
-6%
773
-42%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
3.95
3.22
18%
2.78
30%
4.96
-26%
2.19
45%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
7.46
6.26
16%
5.96
20%
8.95
-20%
4.4
41%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
2.05
1.5
27%
0.91
56%
3.23
-58%
2.27
-11%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
3.82
3.43
10%
3.58
6%
5
-31%
2.2
42%
Gamma
2.49 88%
2.41 91%
2.46 89%
2.21 100%
2.41 91%
CCT
7317 89%
7290 89%
7186 90%
7742 84%
6405 101%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
59
60
2%
62
5%
59.8
1%
59
0%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
91
93
2%
96
5%
91.8
1%
91
0%
Totaal Gemiddelde (Programma / Instellingen)
23% / 11%
7% / 4%
0% / -9%
23% / 7%

* ... kleiner is beter

Responstijd Scherm

De responstijden van het scherm tonen hoe snel het scherm in staat is om van één kleur naar de andere te veranderen. Trage responstijden kunnen aanleiding geven tot 'nabeelden' rond bewegende objecten of het scherm wazig maken (blur). Vooral spelers van snelle 3D-games hebben baat bij een scherm met snelle responstijden.
       Responstijd Zwart naar Wit
12.8 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd↗ 7.6 ms stijging
↘ 5.2 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde prima responstijden in onze tests maar is misschien wat te traag voor competitieve games.
Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.8 (minimum) tot 240 (maximum) ms. » 14 % van alle toestellen zijn beter.
Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd beter is dan het gemiddelde (24.9 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.
       Responstijd 50% Grijs naar 80% Grijs
16.4 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd↗ 8.4 ms stijging
↘ 8 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde prima responstijden in onze tests maar is misschien wat te traag voor competitieve games.
Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.9 (minimum) tot 636 (maximum) ms. » 10 % van alle toestellen zijn beter.
Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd beter is dan het gemiddelde (39.6 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Om de schermhelderheid te verlagen schakelen sommige laptops het backlight erg snel aan en uit. Dit gebeurt aan een dergelijk hoge frequentie dat het niet zichtbaar is voor het menselijk oog. Als de frequentie te laag is kunnen personen met gevoelige ogen geïrriteerd geraken, hoofdpijn krijgen en zelfs flickering waarnemen.
Screen flickering / PWM niet waargenomen

Ter vergelijking: 51 % van alle geteste toestellen maakten geen gebruik van PWM om de schermhelderheid te verlagen. Als het wel werd gebruikt, werd een gemiddelde van 9266 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz waargenomen.

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
HWiNFO
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
LatencyMon
 
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700710720730740750760770780790800810820830840850860870880890900910920930940950960970980990100010101020103010401050106010701080109011001110112011301140115011601170118011901200121012201230124012501260Tooltip
Dell G5 15 5590-P8RVW Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1151 (1096.16-1258.33)
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1066 (1053.71-1188.07)
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1007 (976.09-1115.02)
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø968 (959.49-1081.9)
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1040 (1017.76-1182)
Cinebench R20
CPU (Single Core)
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
Intel Core i7-9750H
457 Points ∼100% +10%
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl
Intel Core i7-9750H
442 Points ∼97% +6%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
Intel Core i7-9750H
430 Points ∼94% +3%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
Intel Core i7-9750H
429 Points ∼94% +3%
Average of class Gaming
  (340 - 509, n=54)
429 Points ∼94% +3%
Dell G5 15 5590-P8RVW
Intel Core i7-9750H
416 Points ∼91%
CPU (Multi Core)
Dell G5 15 5590-P8RVW
Intel Core i7-9750H
2666 Points ∼100%
Average of class Gaming
  (1530 - 4926, n=54)
2522 Points ∼95% -5%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
Intel Core i7-9750H
2507 Points ∼94% -6%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
Intel Core i7-9750H
2448 Points ∼92% -8%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
Intel Core i7-9750H
2427 Points ∼91% -9%
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl
Intel Core i7-9750H
2298 Points ∼86% -14%
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
Intel Core i7-9750H
189 Points ∼100% +11%
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl
Intel Core i7-9750H
181 Points ∼96% +6%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
Intel Core i7-9750H
177 Points ∼94% +4%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
Intel Core i7-9750H
175 Points ∼93% +2%
Dell G5 15 5590-P8RVW
Intel Core i7-9750H
171 Points ∼90%
Average of class Gaming
  (77 - 212, n=529)
157 Points ∼83% -8%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Dell G5 15 5590-P8RVW
Intel Core i7-9750H
1258 Points ∼100%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
Intel Core i7-9750H
1188 Points ∼94% -6%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
Intel Core i7-9750H
1182 Points ∼94% -6%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
Intel Core i7-9750H
1115 Points ∼89% -11%
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl
Intel Core i7-9750H
1057 Points ∼84% -16%
Average of class Gaming
  (196 - 2022, n=532)
834 Points ∼66% -34%
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
171 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1258 Points
Help
PCMark 10 - Score
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9750H, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-1T00
5991 Points ∼100% +10%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9750H, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G
5746 Points ∼96% +5%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8
5697 Points ∼95% +4%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 9750H, 2x Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 (RAID 0)
5654 Points ∼94% +4%
Dell G5 15 5590-P8RVW
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9750H, SK Hynix BC501 HFM512GDJTNG
5462 Points ∼91%
Average of class Gaming
  (2603 - 7171, n=226)
5228 Points ∼87% -4%
Dell G5 15 5590-P8RVW
SK Hynix BC501 HFM512GDJTNG
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl
WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-1T00
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
2x Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 (RAID 0)
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
92%
76%
105%
71%
Write 4K
64.56
108.8
69%
115.5
79%
137.4
113%
97.04
50%
Read 4K
35.64
40.31
13%
57.97
63%
41.37
16%
49.58
39%
Write Seq
748
2488
233%
1555
108%
2500
234%
1838
146%
Read Seq
1039
1916
84%
2590
149%
1576
52%
2421
133%
Write 4K Q32T1
435.7
382.4
-12%
369.3
-15%
446.7
3%
326.9
-25%
Read 4K Q32T1
292.4
421.8
44%
441.7
51%
522.4
79%
372.9
28%
Write Seq Q32T1
869.8
2542
192%
1547
78%
2796
221%
1894
118%
Read Seq Q32T1
1557
3320
113%
2969
91%
3415
119%
2828
82%
SK Hynix BC501 HFM512GDJTNG
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 1557 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 869.8 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 292.4 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 435.7 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 1039 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 748 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 35.64 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 64.56 MB/s
3DMark 11 Performance
18202 punten
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
36724 punten
3DMark Fire Strike Score
15046 punten
3DMark Time Spy Score
6557 punten
Help
3DMark
2560x1440 Port Royal Graphics
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop)
3958 Points ∼100% +8%
Average of class Gaming
  (1097 - 5942, n=62)
3929 Points ∼99% +7%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
3721 Points ∼94% +1%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
3719 Points ∼94% +1%
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
3717 Points ∼94% +1%
Dell G5 15 5590-P8RVW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
3670 Points ∼93%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop)
7277 Points ∼100% +12%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
6748 Points ∼93% +3%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
6716 Points ∼92% +3%
Dell G5 15 5590-P8RVW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
6521 Points ∼90%
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
6419 Points ∼88% -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (368 - 13013, n=167)
5724 Points ∼79% -12%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop)
19123 Points ∼100% +15%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
18060 Points ∼94% +9%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
17335 Points ∼91% +4%
Dell G5 15 5590-P8RVW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
16606 Points ∼87%
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
16483 Points ∼86% -1%
Average of class Gaming
  (385 - 40636, n=555)
11462 Points ∼60% -31%
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop)
24267 Points ∼100% +13%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
22749 Points ∼94% +6%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
22005 Points ∼91% +3%
Dell G5 15 5590-P8RVW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
21427 Points ∼88%
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
18434 Points ∼76% -14%
Average of class Gaming
  (513 - 50983, n=630)
13571 Points ∼56% -37%
0510152025303540455055606570758085Tooltip
Dell G5 15 5590-P8RVW GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9750H, SK Hynix BC501 HFM512GDJTNG; The Witcher 3: Ø62 (57-66)
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9750H, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G; The Witcher 3: Ø65.5 (59-70)
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8; The Witcher 3: Ø63 (1-68)
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9750H, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-1T00; The Witcher 3: Ø63.3 (57-70)
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 9750H, 2x Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 (RAID 0); The Witcher 3: Ø70 (63-76)
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 9750H
70.2 (min: 58) fps ∼100% +14%
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9750H
69 fps ∼98% +12%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9750H
64.4 (min: 54) fps ∼92% +5%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9750H
64.1 fps ∼91% +4%
Dell G5 15 5590-P8RVW
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9750H
61.5 (min: 50) fps ∼88%
Average of class Gaming
  (12.6 - 115, n=327)
50.2 fps ∼72% -18%
lage gem. hoge ultra
The Witcher 3 (2015) 111 61.5 fps
Apex Legends (2019) 106 105 fps
Far Cry New Dawn (2019) 86 78 fps
Anthem (2019) 71.9 67.8 fps
Dirt Rally 2.0 (2019) 112 68.8 fps
Rage 2 (2019) 74.8 71.5 fps
F1 2019 (2019) 130 97 fps
Control (2019) 57.4 fps
Borderlands 3 (2019) 65.3 51.1 fps
FIFA 20 (2019) 180 179 fps
Ghost Recon Breakpoint (2019) 70 52 fps
GRID 2019 (2019) 92.6 67 fps
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2033.53333.433.134.32537.336.539.637.6403131.131.131.731.432.24036.531.931.735.4385033.828.52829.133.16333.62926.827.336.78035.731.531.127.747.610031.831.332.225.135.912531.825.324.427.33316031.427.525.625.933.120030.324.621.922.831.825032.623.521.722.835.531535.923.720.820.73840037.223.719.218.238.550038.323.920.121.240.263037.823.21918.43980037.424.52317.939.8100037.225.225.317.439.2125038.222.920.218.540160038.822.919.718.140.8200038.821.918.917.140.8250039.219.818.816.940.9315040.118.618.117.341.9400039.818.117.917.341.9500033.718.117.817.337.4630028.117.817.71731.2800025.417.617.81728.61000023.617.717.81726.51250020.917.717.617.123.21600018.417.517.616.819.7SPL49.633.632.130.151.5N6.921.71.48.2median 35.9median 22.9median 19.2median 17.9median 38Delta4.93.22.924.2hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseDell G5 15 5590-P8RVW

Geluidsniveau

Onbelast
32 / 33 / 34 dB (A)
HDD
32 dB (A)
Belasting
50 / 52 dB (A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
stil
40 dB(A)
hoorbaar
50 dB(A)
luid
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm afstand)   environment noise: 30 dB(A)
Dell G5 15 5590-P8RVW
9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl
9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop)
Average of class Gaming
 
Noise
1%
-3%
5%
-3%
5%
off / environment *
30
30
-0%
30
-0%
29
3%
30
-0%
29.4 (27.7 - 32, n=327)
2%
Idle Minimum *
32
30
6%
31
3%
30.5
5%
31
3%
31.4 (28 - 42, n=750)
2%
Idle Average *
33
33
-0%
34
-3%
31.5
5%
33
-0%
32.6 (28 - 46.6, n=750)
1%
Idle Maximum *
34
39
-15%
39
-15%
31.5
7%
38
-12%
34.6 (28 - 52, n=750)
-2%
Load Average *
50
45
10%
46
8%
40.6
19%
50
-0%
40.8 (30.1 - 58, n=751)
18%
Witcher 3 ultra *
50
49
2%
53
-6%
49.5
1%
53
-6%
Load Maximum *
52
51
2%
55
-6%
53.4
-3%
56
-8%
48.1 (38.9 - 64.1, n=751)
7%

* ... kleiner is beter

Max. Belasting
 52 °C54 °C52 °C 
 47 °C48 °C47 °C 
 30 °C33 °C33 °C 
Maximum: 54 °C
Gemiddelde: 44 °C
59 °C61 °C58 °C
52 °C52 °C51 °C
33 °C34 °C29 °C
Maximum: 61 °C
Gemiddelde: 47.7 °C
Stroomadapter (max.)  46 °C | Kamertemperatuur 22 °C | Voltcraft IR-900
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 44 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 54 °C / 129 F, compared to the average of 39.6 °C / 103 F, ranging from 21.6 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 61 °C / 142 F, compared to the average of 42.3 °C / 108 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.7 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 33.2 °C / 92 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 40.7 °C / 105 F, compared to the device average of 33.2 °C / 92 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (33 °C / 91.4 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-4.2 °C / -7.6 F).
Dell G5 15 5590-P8RVW
9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl
9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop)
Average of class Gaming
 
Heat
-3%
-13%
-30%
-10%
-3%
Maximum Upper Side *
54
49
9%
58
-7%
48.8
10%
54
-0%
45.9 (28 - 68.8, n=718)
15%
Maximum Bottom *
61
59
3%
64
-5%
55
10%
47
23%
49.6 (25.9 - 78, n=716)
19%
Idle Upper Side *
25
28
-12%
30
-20%
41
-64%
33
-32%
30.8 (21.6 - 46.8, n=670)
-23%
Idle Bottom *
26
29
-12%
31
-19%
45.6
-75%
34
-31%
31.8 (21.1 - 50.3, n=668)
-22%

* ... kleiner is beter

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2033.135.82537.643.73131.435.74035.433.15029.129.76327.333.18027.732.310025.136.312527.343.416025.956.520022.857.725022.86231520.767.340018.273.450021.277.863018.478.180017.977.5100017.475.9125018.573.4160018.177.7200017.179.8250016.979.4315017.383.4400017.373.3500017.370.663001766.880001770.7100001762.51250017.1681600016.868SPL30.189.4N1.480.1median 17.9median 70.7Delta27.143.644.939.640.430.933.83542.828.335.92635.828.642.128.757.423.854.622.957.423.958.52560.92064.219.16417.965.117.372.516.97517.177.818.576.717.874.917.474.117.467.717.676.817.583.317.484.217.279.817.271.617.266.51769.216.863.43090.21.481.4median 17.5median 69.21.86hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseDell G5 15 5590-P8RVWAsus Zephyrus S GX502GW
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Dell G5 15 5590-P8RVW audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 40% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 56% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 18% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 78% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.7% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (11.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 30% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 64% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 11% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 86% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Stroomgebruik
Uit / Standbydarklight 0.4 / Watt
Inactiefdarkmidlight 5 / 13 / 23 Watt
Belasting midlight 121 / 184 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Dell G5 15 5590-P8RVW
9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl
9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop)
Average of class Gaming
 
Power Consumption
-1%
-74%
-230%
-98%
-78%
Idle Minimum *
5
7
-40%
21
-320%
46
-820%
24
-380%
19.4 (3.4 - 113, n=711)
-288%
Idle Average *
13
12
8%
23
-77%
59
-354%
27
-108%
24.9 (6.6 - 119, n=711)
-92%
Idle Maximum *
23
22
4%
32
-39%
65.5
-185%
33
-43%
30.2 (8.3 - 122, n=711)
-31%
Load Average *
121
86
29%
97
20%
99.8
18%
129
-7%
104 (14.1 - 319, n=702)
14%
Load Maximum *
184
177
4%
213
-16%
222.7
-21%
216
-17%
172 (21.9 - 590, n=701)
7%
Witcher 3 ultra *
133
144
-8%
148
-11%
154.1
-16%
176
-32%

* ... kleiner is beter

Batterijduur
Inactief (zonder WLAN, minimale helderheid)
8h 33min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
5h 44min
Belast (maximale helderheid)
1h 35min
Dell G5 15 5590-P8RVW
9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 90 Wh
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q,  Wh
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 94.24 Wh
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl
9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 72 Wh
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 76 Wh
Average of class Gaming
 
Batterijduur
23%
40%
-45%
-34%
-25%
Reader / Idle
513
666
30%
545
6%
221
-57%
353
-31%
349 (39 - 1174, n=673)
-32%
WiFi v1.3
344
478
39%
421
22%
129
-62%
220
-36%
259 (78 - 622, n=374)
-25%
Load
95
96
1%
181
91%
80
-16%
62
-35%
79.1 (18 - 202, n=639)
-17%
H.264
408
257 (88 - 508, n=148)

Pro

+ automatische graphics-switching
+ prima IPS-paneel
+ Thunderbolt-3-poort
+ 144-Hz-scherm

Contra

- luidruchtig en warm onder belasting
- CPU-throttling in 3D-applicaties
- slechts 24 maanden garantie
- trage kaartlezer
Dell G5 15 5590, testtoestel voorzien door: cyberport.de
Dell G5 15 5590, testtoestel voorzien door: cyberport.de

Dit is de verkorte versie van het originele artikel. Het volledige, Engelse testrapport vind je hier.

Met uitzondering van batterijduur maakt de Dell G5 15 5590-P8RVW van 2000 euro een veel betere indruk dan de G5 15 5590-PCNJJ van 1000 euro.

Naast de betere prestaties (processor, grafische kaart, SSD, etc.) en een Thunderbolt-3-poort, heeft de 5590-P8RVW ook een veel sneller scherm. In tegenstelling tot het instapmodel biedt het 144-Hz-scherm van de high-end variant een prima helderheid, degelijke kleurweergave en kortere responstijden.

Het model van 2000 euro deelt echter ook een aantal zwaktes met het goedkopere model, waaronder de trage kaartlezer en de CPU die last heeft van throttling in 3D-applicaties. Deze nadelen staan een hogere totaalscore in de weg.

Dell G5 15 5590-P8RVW - 29-10-2019 v7
Florian Glaser

Behuizing
73 / 98 → 75%
Toetsenbord
79%
Aanwijsapparaat
81%
Aansluitmogelijkheden
69 / 80 → 87%
Gewicht
58 / 10-66 → 86%
Batterij
67 / 95 → 71%
Beeldscherm
84%
Gaming-performance
91%
Applicatie-performance
88%
Temperatuur
80 / 95 → 85%
Luidheid
69 / 90 → 76%
Audio
73%
Gemiddelde
76%
83%
Gaming - Gewogen Gemiddelde

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Overzichten en testrapporten over laptops en mobieltjes > Testrapporten > Kort testrapport Dell G5 15 5590 Laptop: 15-inch gaming-notebook met een Max-Q GPU
Florian Glaser, 2019-11- 1 (Update: 2019-11- 1)