Notebookcheck

Kort testrapport Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX701GX (i7-8750H, RTX 2080 Max-Q) Laptop

Florian Glaser, 👁 Florian Glaser, 03-03-2019

Dun en krachtig. Asus bracht de 17-inch versie van zijn geavanceerde gaming-laptop, bekend als de GX531, uit kort nadat Nvidia zijn Turing-gebaseerde GPU's lanceerde. Ondanks zijn slankheid is de ROG Zephyrus S GX701 buitengewoon capabel en zou hij zich sterk kunnen houden tegen zijn concurrenten. Lees ons testrapport om erachter te komen of het hierin slaagt.

Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX (Zephyrus S Serie)
Grafische kaart
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q - 8192 MB, Core: 990 MHz, Geheugen: 6000 MHz, GDDR6, ForceWare 418.81, Optimus
Geheugen
24576 MB 
, 16 GB SO-DIMM 2666 MHz DDR4 RAM + 8 GB gesoldeerde RAM, alle slots bezet, 24 GB RAM maximum
Beeldscherm
17.3 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 127 PPI, B173HAN04.0 (AUO409D), IPS, Full HD, 144 Hz, G-Sync, Pantone-gecertificeerd, glimmend: nee
Moederbord
Intel HM370
Opslag
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR, 1024 GB 
, NVMe. twee slots; type: M2.2280
Geluidskaart
Realtek ALC294 @ Intel Cannon Point PCH - cAVS (Audio, Voice, Speech)
Verbindingen
3 USB 3.0, 2 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Verbindingen: 3.5-mm gecombineerde audiopoort
Netwerkmogelijkheden
Intel Wireless-AC 9560 (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 5.0
Afmetingen
hoogte x breedte x diepte (in mm): 19 x 399 x 272
Batterij
76 Wh Lithium-Ion, 4 cellen
Besturingssysteem
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
Bijkomende functionaliteiten
Luidsprekers: 2x 2.5 Watt, Toetsenbord: RGB, Toetsenbordverlichting: ja, 230 Watt stroomadapter, externe Full HD webcam , Armoury Crate, 24 Maanden Garantie
Gewicht
2.636 kg, Voeding: 622 g
Prijs
3200 EUR
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Size Comparison

399 mm 273 mm 26.4 mm 2.9 kg397 mm 269 mm 27.5 mm 2.6 kg399 mm 272 mm 19 mm 2.6 kg359 mm 255 mm 18 mm 2.1 kg356 mm 250 mm 18.9 mm 2.1 kg355 mm 235 mm 17.8 mm 2.1 kg
Linkerkant: stoomaansluiting, HDMI 2.0 poort, USB-A 3.1 Gen2 poort, USB-C 3.1 Gen2 poort met DisplayPort 1.4 ondersteuning, 3.5-mm audiopoort
Linkerkant: stoomaansluiting, HDMI 2.0 poort, USB-A 3.1 Gen2 poort, USB-C 3.1 Gen2 poort met DisplayPort 1.4 ondersteuning, 3.5-mm audiopoort
Rechterkant: 2x USB-A 3.0, USB-C 3.0, Kensington Lock
Rechterkant: 2x USB-A 3.0, USB-C 3.0, Kensington Lock
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
684 MBit/s ∼100% +1%
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
679 MBit/s ∼99%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
678 MBit/s ∼99% 0%
MSI GE75 8SG Raider
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
674 MBit/s ∼99% -1%
Acer Predator Triton 500
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
671 MBit/s ∼98% -1%
Average of class Gaming
  (141 - 702, n=239)
603 MBit/s ∼88% -11%
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
598 MBit/s ∼87% -12%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Acer Predator Triton 500
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
683 MBit/s ∼100% +6%
MSI GE75 8SG Raider
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
683 MBit/s ∼100% +6%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
680 MBit/s ∼100% +5%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
655 MBit/s ∼96% +1%
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
647 MBit/s ∼95%
Average of class Gaming
  (144 - 730, n=239)
555 MBit/s ∼81% -14%
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
356 MBit/s ∼52% -45%
300
cd/m²
287
cd/m²
282
cd/m²
299
cd/m²
288
cd/m²
293
cd/m²
286
cd/m²
274
cd/m²
276
cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 300 cd/m² Gemiddelde: 287.2 cd/m² Minimum: 16 cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling: 91 %
Helderheid in Batterij-modus: 288 cd/m²
Contrast: 1440:1 (Zwart: 0.2 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.33 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6.1, calibrated: 2.47
ΔE Greyscale 1.19 | 0.64-98 Ø6.3
88% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 57% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.41
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
B173HAN04.0 (AUO409D), IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3
Acer Predator Triton 500
AU Optronics B156HAN08.2 (AUO82ED), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
LG Philips LGD05C0, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
LGD05C0, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
MSI GE75 8SG Raider
CMN N173HCE-G33 (CMN175C), AHVA, 1920x1080, 17.3
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
B173HAN04.0 (AUO409D), AHVA, 1920x1080, 17.3
Response Times
-14%
-77%
-85%
-4%
-81%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
7.2 (3.6, 3.6)
8 (4, 4)
-11%
16.8 (9.2, 7.6)
-133%
16.4 (8.8, 7.6)
-128%
8 (4, 4)
-11%
17.6 (8.4, 9.2)
-144%
Response Time Black / White *
9.6 (4.4, 5.2)
11.2 (6, 5.2)
-17%
11.6 (7.2, 4.4)
-21%
13.6 (8.4, 5.2)
-42%
9.2 (4.8, 4.4)
4%
11.2 (6.8, 4.4)
-17%
PWM Frequency
26040 (17)
Screen
-50%
-23%
-3%
-12%
-16%
Brightness middle
288
304
6%
314.7
9%
250
-13%
363
26%
295
2%
Brightness
287
299
4%
312
9%
235
-18%
342
19%
291
1%
Brightness Distribution
91
89
-2%
90
-1%
85
-7%
86
-5%
96
5%
Black Level *
0.2
0.27
-35%
0.38
-90%
0.29
-45%
0.27
-35%
0.24
-20%
Contrast
1440
1126
-22%
828
-42%
862
-40%
1344
-7%
1229
-15%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
2.33
4.66
-100%
2.56
-10%
1.46
37%
2.29
2%
3.2
-37%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
5.34
9.65
-81%
4.89
8%
2.47
54%
4.54
15%
6.64
-24%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
2.47
1.72
30%
1.71
31%
2.45
1%
2.52
-2%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
1.19
5.53
-365%
3.4
-186%
1.27
-7%
3.02
-154%
2.16
-82%
Gamma
2.41 91%
2.5 88%
2.3 96%
2.4 92%
2.38 92%
2.46 89%
CCT
6710 97%
8028 81%
6435 101%
6749 96%
7048 92%
6872 95%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
57
60
5%
60.7
6%
60
5%
58
2%
57
0%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
88
93
6%
94.6
8%
93
6%
91
3%
87
-1%
Totaal Gemiddelde (Programma / Instellingen)
-32% / -45%
-50% / -32%
-44% / -17%
-8% / -11%
-49% / -26%

* ... kleiner is beter

Responstijd Scherm

De responstijden van het scherm tonen hoe snel het scherm in staat is om van één kleur naar de andere te veranderen. Trage responstijden kunnen aanleiding geven tot 'nabeelden' rond bewegende objecten of het scherm wazig maken (blur). Vooral spelers van snelle 3D-games hebben baat bij een scherm met snelle responstijden.
       Responstijd Zwart naar Wit
9.6 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd↗ 4.4 ms stijging
↘ 5.2 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde snelle responstijden in onze tests en zou geschikt moeten zijn voor games.
Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.8 (minimum) tot 240 (maximum) ms. » 8 % van alle toestellen zijn beter.
Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd beter is dan het gemiddelde (25.2 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.
       Responstijd 50% Grijs naar 80% Grijs
7.2 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd↗ 3.6 ms stijging
↘ 3.6 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde erg snelle responstijden in onze tests en zou zeer geschikt moeten zijn voor snelle games.
Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.9 (minimum) tot 636 (maximum) ms. » 4 % van alle toestellen zijn beter.
Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd beter is dan het gemiddelde (40.2 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Om de schermhelderheid te verlagen schakelen sommige laptops het backlight erg snel aan en uit. Dit gebeurt aan een dergelijk hoge frequentie dat het niet zichtbaar is voor het menselijk oog. Als de frequentie te laag is kunnen personen met gevoelige ogen geïrriteerd geraken, hoofdpijn krijgen en zelfs flickering waarnemen.
Screen flickering / PWM niet waargenomen

Ter vergelijking: 51 % van alle geteste toestellen maakten geen gebruik van PWM om de schermhelderheid te verlagen. Als het wel werd gebruikt, werd een gemiddelde van 9429 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz waargenomen.

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
GPU-Z
HWiNFO
AS SSD Benchmark
CrystalDiskMark
LatencyMon
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700710720730740750760770780790800810820830840850860870880890900910920930940950960970980990100010101020103010401050106010701080109011001110112011301140115011601170118011901200121012201230Tooltip
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø1112 (1090.93-1218.55)
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø1187 (1126.76-1226.54)
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø1095 (1087.31-1156.25)
Acer Predator Triton 500 Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø980 (961.82-1019.05)
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø922 (913.2-999)
MSI GE75 8SG Raider Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø938 (913.12-1068.63)
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
1.94 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
13.5 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
170 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1218 Points
Help
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
MSI GE75 8SG Raider
Intel Core i7-8750H
176.28 Points ∼100% +4%
Acer Predator Triton 500
Intel Core i7-8750H
176 Points ∼100% +4%
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
Intel Core i7-8750H
174 Points ∼99% +2%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
Intel Core i7-8750H
174 Points ∼99% +2%
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
Intel Core i7-8750H
170 Points ∼96%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Intel Core i7-8750H
166 Points ∼94% -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (77 - 212, n=483)
155 Points ∼88% -9%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
Intel Core i7-8750H
1218 Points ∼100%
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
Intel Core i7-8750H
1204 Points ∼99% -1%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Intel Core i7-8750H
1156 Points ∼95% -5%
MSI GE75 8SG Raider
Intel Core i7-8750H
1068.63 (min: 913.12, max: 1068.63) Points ∼88% -12%
Acer Predator Triton 500
Intel Core i7-8750H
1019 Points ∼84% -16%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
Intel Core i7-8750H
999 Points ∼82% -18%
Average of class Gaming
  (196 - 2022, n=486)
805 Points ∼66% -34%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Acer Predator Triton 500
Intel Core i7-8750H
1.98 Points ∼100% +2%
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
Intel Core i7-8750H
1.94 Points ∼98%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.71 - 2.38, n=416)
1.685 Points ∼85% -13%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
Intel Core i7-8750H
13.5 Points ∼100%
Acer Predator Triton 500
Intel Core i7-8750H
10.98 Points ∼81% -19%
Average of class Gaming
  (1.13 - 21.4, n=517)
7.37 Points ∼55% -45%
PCMark 10 - Score
Acer Predator Triton 500
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 8750H, 2x WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-256G-1014 (RAID 0)
5883 Points ∼100% +5%
MSI GE75 8SG Raider
GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ
5816 Points ∼99% +4%
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
5596 Points ∼95%
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 8750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
5555 Points ∼94% -1%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
5416 Points ∼92% -3%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW010T8
5353 Points ∼91% -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (2603 - 7171, n=179)
5153 Points ∼88% -8%
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
Acer Predator Triton 500
2x WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-256G-1014 (RAID 0)
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW010T8
MSI GE75 8SG Raider
Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
30%
8%
12%
-24%
-6%
Write 4K
92.39
93.6
1%
93.88
2%
97.13
5%
73.4
-21%

73.39
-21%

99.64
8%
Read 4K
39.59
38.82
-2%
40.56
2%
53.66
36%
31.97
-19%

31.93
-19%

48.99
24%
Write Seq
1221
2455
101%
1468
20%
1526
25%
882.44
-28%
972.1
-20%
Read Seq
1005
2107
110%
1540
53%
2020
101%
921.73
-8%
1515
51%
Write 4K Q32T1
292.5
298.7
2%
293.5
0%
285.6
-2%
310.09
6%

297.07
2%

280.62
-4%
Read 4K Q32T1
330.8
338.7
2%
346
5%
321.8
-3%
327.52
-1%

325.47
-2%

327.79
-1%
Write Seq Q32T1
2385
2902
22%
1941
-19%
1533
-36%
1006.9
-58%

928.8
-61%

969.7
-59%
Read Seq Q32T1
3339
3536
6%
3266
-2%
2351
-30%
1610.8
-52%

1607.1
-52%

1756.7
-47%
Write 4K Q8T8
624.5
Read 4K Q8T8
817.93
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3339 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 2385 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 330.8 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 292.5 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 1005 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 1221 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 39.59 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 92.39 MB/s
3DMark
2560x1440 Port Royal Graphics
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
4655 Points ∼100%
Average of class Gaming
  (1417 - 5942, n=38)
4007 Points ∼86% -14%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
3679 Points ∼79% -21%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
3557 Points ∼76% -24%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
MSI GE75 8SG Raider
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
9816 Points ∼100% +15%
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
8512 Points ∼87%
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop)
7431 Points ∼76% -13%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
6728 Points ∼69% -21%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
6562 Points ∼67% -23%
Average of class Gaming
  (368 - 13013, n=127)
5546 Points ∼56% -35%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
MSI GE75 8SG Raider
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
25203 Points ∼100% +17%
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
21515 Points ∼85%
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop)
19236 Points ∼76% -11%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
18153 Points ∼72% -16%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
17598 Points ∼70% -18%
Average of class Gaming
  (385 - 40636, n=509)
11050 Points ∼44% -49%
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
MSI GE75 8SG Raider
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
33741 Points ∼100% +15%
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
29453 Points ∼87%
Acer Predator Triton 500
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
28083 Points ∼83% -5%
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop)
24172 Points ∼72% -18%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
22723 Points ∼67% -23%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
22089 Points ∼65% -25%
Average of class Gaming
  (513 - 50983, n=584)
12962 Points ∼38% -56%
3DMark 11 Performance
21874 punten
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
161739 punten
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
37830 punten
3DMark Fire Strike Score
18147 punten
3DMark Time Spy Score
8098 punten
Help
05101520253035404550556065707580859095100105Tooltip
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR; The Witcher 3: Ø80.8 (71-85)
MSI GE75 8SG Raider GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ; The Witcher 3: Ø92.5 (80-98)
Acer Predator Triton 500 GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 8750H, 2x WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-256G-1014 (RAID 0); The Witcher 3: Ø76.1 (70-81)
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 8750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8; The Witcher 3: Ø70.1 (61-75)
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ; The Witcher 3: Ø62.2 (57-70)
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW010T8; The Witcher 3: Ø51.3 (44-61)
The Witcher 3
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
MSI GE75 8SG Raider
GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 8750H
92.1 fps ∼100% +13%
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 8750H
81.7 (min: 68) fps ∼89%
Acer Predator Triton 500
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 8750H
76.5 (min: 63) fps ∼83% -6%
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 8750H
71.8 fps ∼78% -12%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H
68.9 fps ∼75% -16%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H
58.3 (min: 48) fps ∼63% -29%
Average of class Gaming
  (12.6 - 115, n=281)
48.5 fps ∼53% -41%
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
MSI GE75 8SG Raider
GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 8750H
162 fps ∼100% +7%
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 8750H
151 (min: 123) fps ∼93%
Acer Predator Triton 500
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 8750H
136 (min: 104) fps ∼84% -10%
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 8750H
133.6 fps ∼82% -12%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H
130.1 fps ∼80% -14%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H
86.5 fps ∼53% -43%
Average of class Gaming
  (11.1 - 194, n=237)
83.5 fps ∼52% -45%
lage gem. hoge ultraQHD4K
The Witcher 3 (2015) 15181.757.6fps
Rainbow Six Siege (2015) 23021798.2fps
The Division (2016) 12710051.7fps
Doom (2016) 13412979.3fps
Overwatch (2016) 292196111fps
Mirror's Edge Catalyst (2016) 13512350.2fps
Deus Ex Mankind Divided (2016) 10763.540.6fps
Battlefield 1 (2016) 14613465fps
Dishonored 2 (2016) 1099461.1fps
Resident Evil 7 (2017) 36022018265.1fps
For Honor (2017) 17116413157.2fps
Ghost Recon Wildlands (2017) 10598.25842fps
Prey (2017) 14214113969.5fps
Rocket League (2017) 248218112fps
Dirt 4 (2017) 225150102fps
Playerunknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG) (2017) 20717513951.5fps
Middle-earth: Shadow of War (2017) 1571259944fps
ELEX (2017) 1171159968.135.7fps
Assassin´s Creed Origins (2017) 8280696139fps
Need for Speed Payback (2017) 12712011595.654.3fps
Star Wars Battlefront 2 (2017) 14513111780.942.7fps
Fortnite (2018) 14313813610550.4fps
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 10681.435.9fps
Kingdom Come: Deliverance (2018) 11589.568.450.227.5fps
Far Cry 5 (2018) 1091061007944fps
The Crew 2 (2018) 6060606039.9fps
Monster Hunter World (2018) 12311190.958.429.7fps
F1 2018 (2018) 1691301028756fps
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) 8482786137fps
FIFA 19 (2018) 271254248237188fps
Assassin´s Creed Odyssey (2018) 8776594832fps
Call of Duty Black Ops 4 (2018) 15113813191.441.6fps
Hitman 2 (2018) 78.870.969.166fps
Battlefield V (2018) 14313012298.257.8fps
Farming Simulator 19 (2018) 161141131113fps
Darksiders III (2018) 13012111282.642.7fps
Just Cause 4 (2018) 13710310169.939.9fps

Geluidsniveau

Onbelast
29 / 32 / 33 dB (A)
Belasting
47 / 51 dB (A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
stil
40 dB(A)
hoorbaar
50 dB(A)
luid
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm afstand)   environment noise: 29 dB(A)
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 8750H
Acer Predator Triton 500
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 8750H
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H
MSI GE75 8SG Raider
GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 8750H
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 8750H
Average of class Gaming
 
Noise
2%
10%
-0%
-7%
-4%
1%
off / environment *
29
29
-0%
28.8
1%
30
-3%
30
-3%
29
-0%
29.4 (27.7 - 32, n=286)
-1%
Idle Minimum *
29
30
-3%
28.8
1%
32
-10%
30
-3%
29
-0%
31.5 (28 - 41.7, n=709)
-9%
Idle Average *
32
32
-0%
28.8
10%
34
-6%
34
-6%
32
-0%
32.7 (28 - 46.6, n=709)
-2%
Idle Maximum *
33
34
-3%
29.4
11%
36
-9%
37
-12%
40
-21%
34.7 (28 - 51, n=709)
-5%
Load Average *
47
44
6%
35.7
24%
42
11%
52
-11%
46
2%
40.6 (30.3 - 58, n=710)
14%
Witcher 3 ultra *
49
46
6%
42.5
13%
44
10%
53
-8%
51
-4%
Load Maximum *
51
47
8%
45
12%
48
6%
54
-6%
52
-2%
47.9 (38.9 - 66, n=710)
6%

* ... kleiner is beter

Max. Belasting
 51 °C53 °C49 °C 
 46 °C48 °C42 °C 
 38 °C37 °C35 °C 
Maximum: 53 °C
Gemiddelde: 44.3 °C
49 °C49 °C47 °C
49 °C50 °C46 °C
43 °C45 °C43 °C
Maximum: 50 °C
Gemiddelde: 46.8 °C
Stroomadapter (max.)  52 °C | Kamertemperatuur 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-900
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 44.3 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 33.1 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 53 °C / 127 F, compared to the average of 39.5 °C / 103 F, ranging from 21.6 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 50 °C / 122 F, compared to the average of 42 °C / 108 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.7 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 33.1 °C / 92 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 44.6 °C / 112 F, compared to the device average of 33.1 °C / 92 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 38 °C / 100.4 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-9.2 °C / -16.6 F).
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 8750H
Acer Predator Triton 500
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 8750H
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H
MSI GE75 8SG Raider
GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 8750H
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 8750H
Average of class Gaming
 
Heat
-10%
6%
-7%
7%
-15%
-1%
Maximum Upper Side *
53
49
8%
49
8%
56
-6%
46
13%
59
-11%
45.8 (28 - 68.8, n=675)
14%
Maximum Bottom *
50
58
-16%
49
2%
66
-32%
45
10%
54
-8%
49.4 (25.9 - 78, n=673)
1%
Idle Upper Side *
27
33
-22%
25.4
6%
27
-0%
27
-0%
33
-22%
30.7 (21.6 - 46.8, n=626)
-14%
Idle Bottom *
30
33
-10%
27.2
9%
27
10%
29
3%
35
-17%
31.6 (21.1 - 50.3, n=624)
-5%

* ... kleiner is beter

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2040.243.32538.238.23130.8294036.334.4502728.76328.4358028.73610027.345.512524.852.316021.961.420022.967.92502470.231520.470.240018.969.150018.768.263018.273.180017.673.5100017.67312501971.3160017.771.9200017.171.8250017.271.1315017.272.9400017.365.8500017.462.5630017.362.980001754.71000017.254.51250017.151.21600016.941.4SPL3082.4N1.355.7median 17.6median 68.2Delta1.87.837.944.634.235.930.335.135.94027.840.72734.230.745.829.255.625.545.422.754.822.962.722.565.220.466.819.163.918.965.317.270.316.875.217.274.320.873.817.680.11784.6178317.278.817.275.417.27617.2751775.51774.11771.116.973.43090.71.481.1median 17.2median 73.825.3hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseAsus Zephyrus S GX701GXMSI GE75 8SG Raider
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | reduced highs - on average 6.9% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 33% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 13% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

MSI GE75 8SG Raider audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.1% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 15% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 6% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Stroomgebruik
Uit / Standbydarklight 0.8 / 1.3 Watt
Inactiefdarkmidlight 19 / 22 / 30 Watt
Belasting midlight 104 / 203 Watt