Notebookcheck

Kort testrapport MSI GE75 8SG Raider (i7-8750H, RTX 2080) Laptop

Andreas Osthoff, 👁 Florian Glaser (vertaald door Siemon Boes), 27-03-2019

Volle GPU-prestaties? MSI biedt zijn dunne GE75 Raider ook met de high-end GeForce RTX 2080 en maakt geen gebruik van de Max-Q-versie. We gaan na of de upgrade het geld waard is.

MSI GE75 8SG Raider (GE75 Serie)
Processor
Intel Core i7-8750H
Grafische kaart
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop) - 8192 MB, Core: 1380 MHz, Geheugen: 1750 MHz, GDDR6, ForceWare 418.91, Optimus
Geheugen
16384 MB 
, DDR4-2666, Dual-Channel, 2 sleuven, max. 32 GB
Beeldscherm
17.3 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 127 PPI, CMN N173HCE-G33 (CMN175C), AHVA, Full-HD, 144 Hz, glimmend: nee
Moederbord
Intel Cannon Lake HM370
Opslag
Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ, 512 GB 
, SSD + Seagate BarraCuda Pro ST1000LM049, 1 TB HDD, 7200 rpm, Slots: 2x M.2 Type 2280 & 1x 2.5"
Geluidskaart
Realtek ALC1220 @ Intel Cannon Point PCH
Verbindingen
2 USB 3.0, 2 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Verbindingen: 3.5-mm-koptelefoon, 3.5-mm-microfoon, Card Reader: SD
Netwerkmogelijkheden
Killer E2500 Gigabit Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000MBit), Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW) (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 5.0
Afmetingen
hoogte x breedte x diepte (in mm): 27.5 x 397 x 269
Batterij
65 Wh Lithium-Ion, 6 cells
Besturingssysteem
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: 720p
Bijkomende functionaliteiten
Luidsprekers: Dynaudio Stereo, Toetsenbord: Chiclet, Toetsenbordverlichting: ja, 280-Watt-voeding, MSI Software Pack, 24 Maanden Garantie
Gewicht
2.646 kg, Voeding: 986 g
Prijs
3000 EUR
Links
MSI startpagina
MSI laptopsectie
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Formaat Vergelijking

412.6 mm 304.9 mm 23 mm 2.8 kg412 mm 285 mm 19.6 mm 2.4 kg399 mm 273 mm 26.4 mm 2.9 kg397 mm 269 mm 27.5 mm 2.6 kg399 mm 272 mm 19 mm 2.6 kg
Rechts: SD-lezer, 2x USB-A 3.1 Gen.1, stroom
Rechts: SD-lezer, 2x USB-A 3.1 Gen.1, stroom
Links: Kensington Lock, RJ45, HDMI 2.0, Mini-DisplayPort 1.2, USB-A 3.1 Gen.2, USB-C 3.1 Gen.2, 3.5-mm-koptelefoon, 3.5-mm-microfoon
Links: Kensington Lock, RJ45, HDMI 2.0, Mini-DisplayPort 1.2, USB-A 3.1 Gen.2, USB-C 3.1 Gen.2, 3.5-mm-koptelefoon, 3.5-mm-microfoon

Top 10 Testrapporten

» Top 10 Multimedia Notebooks 
» Top 10 Gaming-Notebooks
» Top 10 Budget Office/Business-Notebooks
» Top 10 Premium Office/Business-Notebooks
» Top 10 Workstation-Laptops
» Top 10 Lichtgewicht Gaming-Notebooks
» Top 10 Subnotebooks
» Top 10 Smartphones tot €120
» Top 10 Smartphones tot €300
» Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Top 10 Convertibles
» Top 10 Tablets
» Top 10 Windows-Tablets
» Top 10 Phablets (>5.5-inch)
» Top 10 Smartphones
» Top 10 Smartphones (≤5-inch)
» Best Geteste Notebook Beeldschermen
» Top 10 Notebooks tot € 1.000De beste notebookbeeldschermen zoals getest door Notebookcheck
» Top 10 Notebooks tot €500
» Top 10 Notebooks tot €300

SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
MSI GS73 Stealth 8RF-011
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
172 MB/s ∼100% +562%
Average of class Gaming
  (11.7 - 202, n=228)
91.1 MB/s ∼53% +250%
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
80 MB/s ∼47% +208%
MSI GE75 8SG Raider
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
26 MB/s ∼15%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
MSI GS73 Stealth 8RF-011
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
215 MB/s ∼100% +696%
Average of class Gaming
  (13.4 - 257, n=226)
109 MB/s ∼51% +304%
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
85 MB/s ∼40% +215%
MSI GE75 8SG Raider
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
27 MB/s ∼13%
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
679 MBit/s ∼100% +1%
MSI GE75 8SG Raider
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
674 MBit/s ∼99%
Average of class Gaming
  (141 - 702, n=229)
601 MBit/s ∼89% -11%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
599 MBit/s ∼88% -11%
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
598 MBit/s ∼88% -11%
MSI GS73 Stealth 8RF-011
Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter
468 MBit/s ∼69% -31%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
MSI GE75 8SG Raider
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
683 MBit/s ∼100%
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
647 MBit/s ∼95% -5%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
605 MBit/s ∼89% -11%
Average of class Gaming
  (144 - 730, n=229)
550 MBit/s ∼81% -19%
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
356 MBit/s ∼52% -48%
MSI GS73 Stealth 8RF-011
Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter
317 MBit/s ∼46% -54%
361
cd/m²		364
cd/m²		330
cd/m²
354
cd/m²		363
cd/m²		322
cd/m²
340
cd/m²		328
cd/m²		314
cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 364 cd/m² Gemiddelde: 341.8 cd/m² Minimum: 19 cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling: 86 %
Helderheid in Batterij-modus: 363 cd/m²
Contrast: 1344:1 (Zwart: 0.27 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.29 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6.1, calibrated: 2.45
ΔE Greyscale 3.02 | 0.64-98 Ø6.3
91% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 58% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.38
MSI GE75 8SG Raider
CMN N173HCE-G33 (CMN175C), , 1920x1080, 17.3		Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
B173HAN04.0 (AUO409D), , 1920x1080, 17.3		Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
AU Optronics B173HAN03.2, , 1920x1080, 17.3		Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
B173HAN04.0 (AUO409D), , 1920x1080, 17.3		MSI GS73 Stealth 8RF-011
CMN N173HHE-G32 (CMN1747), , 1920x1080, 17.3		MSI GE75 8SF
Chi Mei N173HCE-G33, , 1920x1080, 17.3
Response Times
3%
-67%
-71%
11%
-11%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
8 (4, 4)
7.2 (3.6, 3.6)
10%
15.6 (8, 7.6)
-95%
17.6 (8.4, 9.2)
-120%
7.8 (4.4, 3.4)
2%
9.6 (5.2, 4.4)
-20%
Response Time Black / White *
9.2 (4.8, 4.4)
9.6 (4.4, 5.2)
-4%
12.8 (7.6, 5.2)
-39%
11.2 (6.8, 4.4)
-22%
6.2 (4.4, 1.8)
33%
10.4 (5.2, 5.2)
-13%
PWM Frequency
26040 (17)
25510 (14)
-2%
25770 (17)
-1%
Screen
3%
-43%
-8%
-9%
17%
Brightness middle
363
288
-21%
299.1
-18%
295
-19%
262
-28%
370.4
2%
Brightness
342
287
-16%
273
-20%
291
-15%
261
-24%
348
2%
Brightness Distribution
86
91
6%
81
-6%
96
12%
94
9%
89
3%
Black Level *
0.27
0.2
26%
0.27
-0%
0.24
11%
0.2
26%
0.29
-7%
Contrast
1344
1440
7%
1108
-18%
1229
-9%
1310
-3%
1277
-5%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
2.29
2.33
-2%
5.07
-121%
3.2
-40%
3.96
-73%
1.26
45%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
4.54
5.34
-18%
10.55
-132%
6.64
-46%
7.29
-61%
3.02
33%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
2.45
2.47
-1%
3.31
-35%
2.52
-3%
2.18
11%
1.21
51%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
3.02
1.19
61%
6.8
-125%
2.16
28%
3.09
-2%
1.4
54%
Gamma
2.38 92%
2.41 91%
2.46 89%
2.46 89%
2.48 89%
2.2 100%
CCT
7048 92%
6710 97%
7805 83%
6872 95%
6977 93%
6747 96%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
58
57
-2%
58.5
1%
57
-2%
76
31%
59.7
3%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
91
88
-3%
89.9
-1%
87
-4%
100
10%
94.4
4%
Totaal Gemiddelde (Programma / Instellingen)
3% / 3%
-55% / -47%
-40% / -18%
1% / -5%
3% / 11%

* ... kleiner is beter

Responstijd Scherm

ℹ
De responstijden van het scherm tonen hoe snel het scherm in staat is om van één kleur naar de andere te veranderen. Trage responstijden kunnen aanleiding geven tot 'nabeelden' rond bewegende objecten of het scherm wazig maken (blur). Vooral spelers van snelle 3D-games hebben baat bij een scherm met snelle responstijden.
   ↔    Responstijd Zwart naar Wit
9.2 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd↗ 4.8 ms stijging
↘ 4.4 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde snelle responstijden in onze tests en zou geschikt moeten zijn voor games.
Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.8 (minimum) tot 240 (maximum) ms. » 7 % van alle toestellen zijn beter.
Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd beter is dan het gemiddelde (25.3 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.
   ↔    Responstijd 50% Grijs naar 80% Grijs
8 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd↗ 4 ms stijging
↘ 4 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde snelle responstijden in onze tests en zou geschikt moeten zijn voor games.
Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.9 (minimum) tot 636 (maximum) ms. » 5 % van alle toestellen zijn beter.
Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd beter is dan het gemiddelde (40.3 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
Om de schermhelderheid te verlagen schakelen sommige laptops het backlight erg snel aan en uit. Dit gebeurt aan een dergelijk hoge frequentie dat het niet zichtbaar is voor het menselijk oog. Als de frequentie te laag is kunnen personen met gevoelige ogen geïrriteerd geraken, hoofdpijn krijgen en zelfs flickering waarnemen.
Screen flickering / PWM waargenomen 26040 Hz ≤ 17 % helderheid instelling

Het backlight van het scherm flikkert aan 26040 Hz (hoogstwaarschijnlijk met PWM - Pulse-Width Modulation) aan een helderheid van 17 % en lager. Boven deze helderheid zou er geen flickering / PWM mogen optreden.

De frequentie van 26040 Hz is redelijk hoog en de meeste mensen die gevoelig zijn aan flickering zouden dit dus niet mogen waarnemen of geïrriteerde ogen krijgen.

Ter vergelijking: 51 % van alle geteste toestellen maakten geen gebruik van PWM om de schermhelderheid te verlagen. Als het wel werd gebruikt, werd een gemiddelde van 9524 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz waargenomen.

LatencyMon (Wi-Fi on)
LatencyMon (Wi-Fi on)
01020304050607080901001101201301401501601701801902002102202302402502602702802903003103203303403503603703803904004104204304404504604704804905005105205305405505605705805906006106206306406506606706806907007107207307407507607707807908008108208308408508608708808909009109209309409509609709809901000101010201030104010501060107010801090110011101120113011401150116011701180119012001210122012301240Tooltip
MSI GE75 8SG Raider Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø938 (913.12-1068.63)
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø1112 (1090.93-1218.55)
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø1139 (1122.59-1232.82)
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø1187 (1126.76-1226.54)
MSI GS73 Stealth 8RF-011 Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø995 (976.78-1132)
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Eurocom Sky X7C i9-9900K
Intel Core i9-9900K
212 Points ∼100% +20%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Turing
Intel Core i9-9900K
207 Points ∼98% +17%
MSI GE75 8SG Raider
Intel Core i7-8750H
176.28 Points ∼83%
MSI GS73 Stealth 8RF-011
Intel Core i7-8750H
175 Points ∼83% -1%
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
Intel Core i7-8750H
174 Points ∼82% -1%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H
  (163 - 177, n=84)
172 Points ∼81% -2%
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
Intel Core i7-8750H
170 Points ∼80% -4%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
Intel Core i7-8750H
167 Points ∼79% -5%
MSI GE75 8SF
Intel Core i7-8750H
166 Points ∼78% -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (77 - 212, n=474)
154 Points ∼73% -13%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Eurocom Sky X7C i9-9900K
Intel Core i9-9900K
1968 Points ∼100% +84%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Turing
Intel Core i9-9900K
1944 Points ∼99% +82%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
Intel Core i7-8750H
1233 Points ∼63% +15%
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
Intel Core i7-8750H
1218 Points ∼62% +14%
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
Intel Core i7-8750H
1204 Points ∼61% +13%
MSI GS73 Stealth 8RF-011
Intel Core i7-8750H
1132 Points ∼58% +6%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H
  (863 - 1251, n=91)
1108 Points ∼56% +4%
MSI GE75 8SG Raider
Intel Core i7-8750H
1068.63 (min: 913.12, max: 1068.63) Points ∼54%
MSI GE75 8SF
Intel Core i7-8750H
1066 Points ∼54% 0%
Average of class Gaming
  (196 - 2022, n=477)
799 Points ∼41% -25%
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
176.28 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1068.63 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
114.39 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.62 %
Help
PCMark 10 | PCMark 8
PCMark 10
Digital Content Creation
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
8470 Points ∼100% +10%
MSI GE75 8SG Raider
GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ
7697 Points ∼91%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
  (7337 - 7697, n=2)
7517 Points ∼89% -2%
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 8750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
7227 Points ∼85% -6%
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
7102 Points ∼84% -8%
Average of class Gaming
  (1764 - 11191, n=166)
6242 Points ∼74% -19%
MSI GE75 8SF
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1
6161 Points ∼73% -20%
Productivity
MSI GE75 8SG Raider
GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ
7759 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
  (7497 - 7759, n=2)
7628 Points ∼98% -2%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
7397 Points ∼95% -5%
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
7352 Points ∼95% -5%
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 8750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
7331 Points ∼94% -6%
MSI GE75 8SF
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1
7218 Points ∼93% -7%
Average of class Gaming
  (4175 - 8968, n=167)
7108 Points ∼92% -8%
Essentials
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
9607 Points ∼100% +7%
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
9111 Points ∼95% +2%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
  (8968 - 9041, n=2)
9005 Points ∼94% 0%
MSI GE75 8SG Raider
GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ
8968 Points ∼93%
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 8750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
8780 Points ∼91% -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (4892 - 10668, n=168)
8305 Points ∼86% -7%
MSI GE75 8SF
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1
8277 Points ∼86% -8%
Score
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
6053 Points ∼100% +4%
MSI GE75 8SG Raider
GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ
5816 Points ∼96%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
  (5680 - 5816, n=2)
5748 Points ∼95% -1%
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
5596 Points ∼92% -4%
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 8750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
5555 Points ∼92% -4%
MSI GE75 8SF
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1
5138 Points ∼85% -12%
Average of class Gaming
  (2603 - 7171, n=169)
5135 Points ∼85% -12%
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
5882 Points ∼100% +6%
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 8750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
5663 Points ∼96% +2%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
  (5574 - 5697, n=2)
5636 Points ∼96% +1%
MSI GE75 8SG Raider
GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ
5574 Points ∼95%
MSI GE75 8SF
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1
5338 Points ∼91% -4%
MSI GS73 Stealth 8RF-011
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
5323 Points ∼90% -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (2484 - 6515, n=357)
5002 Points ∼85% -10%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
5107 Points ∼100% +4%
MSI GE75 8SG Raider
GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ
4918 Points ∼96%
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 8750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
4861 Points ∼95% -1%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
  (4622 - 4918, n=2)
4770 Points ∼93% -3%
MSI GS73 Stealth 8RF-011
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
4393 Points ∼86% -11%
Average of class Gaming
  (4412 - 6093, n=375)
4240 Points ∼83% -14%
MSI GE75 8SF
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1
3662 Points ∼72% -26%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
4918 punten
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
8493 punten
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
5574 punten
Help
MSI GE75 8SG Raider
Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ		Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR		Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ		Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8		MSI GS73 Stealth 8RF-011
Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP		MSI GE75 8SF
Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1		Average Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ
 
AS SSD
88%
31%
11%
38%
-12%
7%
Score Total
2340
4771
104%
2784
19%
1715
-27%
3083
32%
2109
-10%
2326 (2233 - 2405, n=3)
-1%
Score Write
870
2091
140%
1441
66%
942
8%
906
4%
799
-8%
840 (773 - 878, n=3)
-3%
Score Read
972
1721
77%
878
-10%
510
-48%
1456
50%
869
-11%
986 (960 - 1026, n=3)
1%
Access Time Write *
0.046
0.031
33%
0.04
13%
0.045
2%
0.038
17%
0.059
-28%
0.0447 (0.044 - 0.046, n=3)
3%
Access Time Read *
0.117
0.08
32%
0.063
46%
0.11
6%
0.077
34%
0.173
-48%
0.0947 (0.063 - 0.117, n=3)
19%
4K-64 Write
696.68
1733.9
149%
1212.35
74%
726.69
4%
690.74
-1%
650.03
-7%
669 (602 - 708, n=3)
-4%
4K-64 Read
860.64
1576.8
83%
727.26
-15%
326.47
-62%
1238.38
44%
748.37
-13%
849 (839 - 861, n=3)
-1%
4K Write
83.03
122.46
47%
96.04
16%
122.81
48%
98.36
18%
67.12
-19%
84.8 (83 - 86.8, n=3)
2%
4K Read
22.26
53.01
138%
35.05
57%
52.43
136%
42.81
92%
25.36
14%
31.5 (22.3 - 36.4, n=3)
42%
Seq Write
906
2347.01
159%
1328.15
47%
927
2%
1172.8
29%
822.99
-9%
868 (828 - 906, n=3)
-4%
Seq Read
888
910.97
3%
1152.78
30%
1315
48%
1749.34
97%
948.8
7%
1052 (850 - 1419, n=3)
18%

* ... kleiner is beter

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
AS SSD
hddimg
Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 1607.1 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 928.8 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 327.52 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 297.07 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 921.73 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 882.44 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 31.97 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 73.4 MB/s
CDM 6 Write 4K Q8T8: 624.5 MB/s
CDM 6 Read 4K Q8T8: 817.93 MB/s
3DMark 11 | 3DMark
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
  (33396 - 38809, n=10)
35701 Points ∼100% +6%
Eurocom Sky X7C i9-9900K
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), Intel Core i9-9900K
35224 Points ∼99% +4%
MSI GE75 8SG Raider
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-8750H
33741 Points ∼95%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Turing
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), Intel Core i9-9900K
33396 Points ∼94% -1%
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H
29453 Points ∼82% -13%
MSI GE75 8SF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-8750H
26097 Points ∼73% -23%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H
25765 Points ∼72% -24%
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-8750H
24172 Points ∼68% -28%
MSI GS73 Stealth 8RF-011
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H
18349 Points ∼51% -46%
Average of class Gaming
  (513 - 50983, n=574)
12879 Points ∼36% -62%
3DMark
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
  (9542 - 10992, n=8)
10151 Points ∼100% +3%
MSI GE75 8SG Raider
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-8750H
9816 Points ∼97%
Eurocom Sky X7C i9-9900K
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), Intel Core i9-9900K
9780 Points ∼96% 0%
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H
8512 Points ∼84% -13%
MSI GE75 8SF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-8750H
7789 Points ∼77% -21%
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-8750H
7431 Points ∼73% -24%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H
7202 Points ∼71% -27%
Average of class Gaming
  (368 - 13013, n=117)
5597 Points ∼55% -43%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Eurocom Sky X7C i9-9900K
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), Intel Core i9-9900K
25440 Points ∼100% +1%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
  (23089 - 27145, n=9)
25341 Points ∼100% +1%
MSI GE75 8SG Raider
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-8750H
25203 Points ∼99%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Turing
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), Intel Core i9-9900K
23089 Points ∼91% -8%
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H
21515 Points ∼85% -15%
MSI GE75 8SF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-8750H
20236 Points ∼80% -20%
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-8750H
19236 Points ∼76% -24%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H
18520 Points ∼73% -27%
MSI GS73 Stealth 8RF-011
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H
14427 Points ∼57% -43%
Average of class Gaming
  (385 - 40636, n=499)
11008 Points ∼43% -56%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Eurocom Sky X7C i9-9900K
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), Intel Core i9-9900K
158891 Points ∼100% +26%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
  (107368 - 161161, n=8)
137765 Points ∼87% +9%
MSI GE75 8SG Raider
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-8750H
126474 Points ∼80%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Turing
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), Intel Core i9-9900K
118148 Points ∼74% -7%
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H
117764 Points ∼74% -7%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H
113870 Points ∼72% -10%
MSI GS73 Stealth 8RF-011
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H
95034 Points ∼60% -25%
Average of class Gaming
  (5761 - 184578, n=484)
65326 Points ∼41% -48%
MSI GE75 8SF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-8750H
64283 Points ∼40% -49%
3DMark 11 Performance
22658 punten
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
35054 punten
3DMark Fire Strike Score
19661 punten
3DMark Time Spy Score
9018 punten
Help
The Witcher 3
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
  (90.3 - 101, n=8)
96 fps ∼100% +4%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Turing
Intel Core i9-9900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
94.5 fps ∼98% +3%
MSI GE75 8SG Raider
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
92.1 fps ∼96%
Eurocom Sky X7C i9-9900K
Intel Core i9-9900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
90.3 fps ∼94% -2%
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
81.7 (min: 68) fps ∼85% -11%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
73.1 fps ∼76% -21%
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop)
71.8 fps ∼75% -22%
MSI GE75 8SF
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop)
70.9 fps ∼74% -23%
MSI GS73 Stealth 8RF-011
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
49.6 fps ∼52% -46%
Average of class Gaming
  (12.6 - 115, n=271)
48.3 fps ∼50% -48%
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Eurocom Sky X7C i9-9900K
Intel Core i9-9900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
174.2 fps ∼100% +8%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
  (136 - 194, n=8)
172 fps ∼99% +6%
MSI GE75 8SG Raider
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
162 fps ∼93%
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
151 (min: 123) fps ∼87% -7%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
144.2 fps ∼83% -11%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Turing
Intel Core i9-9900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
135.6 fps ∼78% -16%
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop)
133.6 fps ∼77% -18%
MSI GE75 8SF
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop)
115.7 fps ∼66% -29%
MSI GS73 Stealth 8RF-011
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
91.6 fps ∼53% -43%
Average of class Gaming
  (11.1 - 194, n=231)
83.3 fps ∼48% -49%
1366x768 Medium Graphics & Postprocessing
Eurocom Sky X7C i9-9900K
Intel Core i9-9900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
272.8 fps ∼100% +19%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Turing
Intel Core i9-9900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
266.8 fps ∼98% +16%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
  (210 - 273, n=6)
251 fps ∼92% +9%
MSI GE75 8SG Raider
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
230 fps ∼84%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
222.4 fps ∼82% -3%
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop)
204.1 fps ∼75% -11%
MSI GE75 8SF
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop)
154 fps ∼56% -33%
Average of class Gaming
  (20.9 - 273, n=129)
133 fps ∼49% -42%
1024x768 Low Graphics & Postprocessing
Eurocom Sky X7C i9-9900K
Intel Core i9-9900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
387.2 fps ∼100% +40%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Turing
Intel Core i9-9900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
335.4 fps ∼87% +22%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
  (276 - 387, n=6)
325 fps ∼84% +18%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
305.4 fps ∼79% +11%
MSI GE75 8SG Raider
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
276 fps ∼71%
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop)
255.3 fps ∼66% -7%
MSI GE75 8SF
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop)
193.9 fps ∼50% -30%
Average of class Gaming
  (17 - 387, n=116)
192 fps ∼50% -30%
05101520253035404550556065707580859095100105Tooltip
MSI GE75 8SG Raider GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ: Ø92.5 (80-98)
lage gem. hoge ultra
The Witcher 3 (2015) 27623016292.1fps
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 134.8125.5109103.9fps
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 236174155145fps
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 1028975fps
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) 12611110699fps
Assassin´s Creed Odyssey (2018) 86757365fps
Battlefield V (2018) 144132117111fps
Darksiders III (2018) 195129126121fps
Just Cause 4 (2018) 181161118116fps
Far Cry New Dawn (2019) 109949082fps
Dirt Rally 2.0 (2019) 21615914496fps

Geluidsniveau

Onbelast
30 / 34 / 37 dB (A)
HDD
33 dB (A)
Belasting
52 / 54 dB (A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
stil
40 dB(A)
hoorbaar
50 dB(A)
luid
  
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm afstand)   environment noise: 30 dB(A)
MSI GE75 8SG Raider
GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ		Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR		Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ		Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 8750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8		MSI GS73 Stealth 8RF-011
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP		MSI GE75 8SF
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1
Noise
7%
14%
3%
7%
4%
off / environment *
30
29
3%
28.3
6%
29
3%
30
-0%
28.3
6%
Idle Minimum *
30
29
3%
31.5
-5%
29
3%
30
-0%
33.5
-12%
Idle Average *
34
32
6%
31.6
7%
32
6%
34
-0%
33.6
1%
Idle Maximum *
37
33
11%
31.6
15%
40
-8%
36
3%
35
5%
Load Average *
52
47
10%
32.3
38%
46
12%
43
17%
38
27%
Witcher 3 ultra *
53
49
8%
43
19%
51
4%
45
15%
50
6%
Load Maximum *
54
51
6%
45.5
16%
52
4%
45
17%
56.9
-5%

* ... kleiner is beter

Max. Belasting
 46 °C46 °C44 °C 
 46 °C46 °C41 °C 
 38 °C38 °C34 °C 
Maximum: 46 °C
Gemiddelde: 42.1 °C
43 °C44 °C45 °C
40 °C43 °C43 °C
30 °C33 °C31 °C
Maximum: 45 °C
Gemiddelde: 39.1 °C
Stroomadapter (max.)  46 °C | Kamertemperatuur 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-900
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 42.1 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 33 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 39.5 °C / 103 F, ranging from 21.6 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 42 °C / 108 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.8 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 33 °C / 91 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 42 °C / 108 F, compared to the device average of 33 °C / 91 F.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 40 °C / 104 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-11.2 °C / -20.2 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2037.944.62534.235.93130.335.14035.9405027.840.7632734.28030.745.810029.255.612525.545.416022.754.820022.962.725022.565.231520.466.840019.163.950018.965.363017.270.380016.875.2100017.274.3125020.873.8160017.680.120001784.625001783315017.278.8400017.275.4500017.276630017.27580001775.5100001774.1125001771.11600016.973.4SPL3090.7N1.481.1median 17.2median 73.8Delta25.343.336.736.633.7312832.231.72827.625.528.525.83226.54224.643.323.345.924.953.12357.720.459.920.165.519.77219.478.819.878.521.382.92079.219.978.619.978.620.275.620.374.820.675.720.371.920.276.42063.719.86019.562.419.371.932.389.11.779.4median 20.2median 71.91.19.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseMSI GE75 8SG RaiderMSI GS73 Stealth 8RF-011
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
MSI GE75 8SG Raider audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.1% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 15% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 6% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

MSI GS73 Stealth 8RF-011 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | reduced highs - on average 5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 64% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 31% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 36% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 58% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Stroomgebruik
Uit / Standbydarklight 0.1 / 0.1 Watt
Inactiefdarkmidlight 7 / 15 / 22 Watt
Belasting midlight 92 / 254 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
MSI GE75 8SG Raider
8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ, AHVA, 1920x1080, 17.3		Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3		Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3		Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8, AHVA, 1920x1080, 17.3		MSI GS73 Stealth 8RF-011
8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, TN, 1920x1080, 17.3		MSI GE75 8SF
8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3		Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
 		Average of class Gaming
 
Power Consumption
-38%
-40%
-41%
6%
-30%
-81%
-54%
Idle Minimum *
7
19
-171%
20.2
-189%
19
-171%
8
-14%
16.4
-134%
20.5 (5 - 41.3, n=7)
-193%
19.8 (3.5 - 113, n=659)
-183%
Idle Average *
15
22
-47%
27.2
-81%
22
-47%
14
7%
21.9
-46%
28 (15 - 45, n=7)
-87%
25.3 (6.8 - 119, n=659)
-69%
Idle Maximum *
22
30
-36%
28.7
-30%
29
-32%
22
-0%
25.4
-15%
35.7 (22 - 55, n=7)
-62%
30.4 (8.3 - 122, n=659)
-38%
Load Average *
92
104
-13%
90.8
1%
102
-11%
92
-0%
90.7
1%
112 (92 - 122, n=7)
-22%
104 (14.1 - 319, n=650)
-13%
Load Maximum *
254
203
20%
165.4
35%
231
9%
207
19%
222.9
12%
356 (254 - 485, n=7)
-40%
169 (21.9 - 590, n=649)
33%
Witcher 3 ultra *
207
167
19%
152.1
27%
190
8%
154
26%
203.3
2%

* ... kleiner is beter

Batterijduur
Inactief (zonder WLAN, minimale helderheid)
7h 48min
Battery Runtime The Witcher 3 ultra
0h 50min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3 (Edge 44.17763.1.0)
4h 41min
Belast (maximale helderheid)
0h 53min
MSI GE75 8SG Raider
8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 65 Wh		Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 76 Wh		Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 76 Wh		Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 66 Wh		MSI GS73 Stealth 8RF-011
8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 51 Wh		MSI GE75 8SF
8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 65 Wh		Average of class Gaming
 
Batterijduur
-19%
-32%
-2%
-14%
-25%
5%
Reader / Idle
468
298
-36%
372
-21%
346
-26%
339 (39 - 1174, n=635)
-28%
WiFi v1.3
281
230
-18%
190
-32%
235
-16%
200
-29%
212
-25%
254 (78 - 622, n=322)
-10%
Witcher 3 ultra
50
52
4%
55 (50 - 66, n=4)
10%
Load
53
52
-2%
67
26%
60
13%
78.9 (18 - 202, n=601)
49%

Pro

+ uitstekend 144-Hz-paneel
+ compacte behuizing met dunne randen
+ erg goede GPU-prestaties
+ prima toetsenbord met RGB-verlichting en verlichte USB-poorten
+ krachtige luidsprekers
+ plaats voor drie opslagapparaten
+ degelijke batterijduur

Contra

- moeilijk in onderhoud
- luidruchtige ventilatoren en HDD tijdens gamen
- geen Thunderbolt 3 of G-Sync
- erg trage SD-kaartlezer
- CPU Turbo Boost-prestaties zouden beter mogen

Besluit – De upgrade is een goede investering

Getest: MSI GE75 Raider 8SG. Testmodel voorzien door MSI Germany.
Getest: MSI GE75 Raider 8SG. Testmodel voorzien door MSI Germany.

Dit is de verkorte versie van het originele artikel. Het volledige, Engelse testrapport vind je hier.

De nieuwe MSI GE75 Raider is merkbaar compacter dan zijn voorganger, maar beschikt over een veel krachtigere GPU. Als je bereid bent om de meerprijs te betalen voor de RTX 2080, zal je zeker niet bedrogen uitkomen, aangezien de prestaties een stuk hoger liggen dan bij de goedkopere versies met de RTX 2070 of RTX 2060. De CPU-prestaties zouden zeker wat beter mogen zijn, maar vormen geen beperking voor het spelen van games.

Kleiner, dunner, sneller - dit is een grote uitdaging voor de koeling. MSI slaagt erin om de warmte efficiënt af te voeren zonder grote (negatieve) impact op de prestaties. Het nadeel is het luide geluid van de ventilatoren - en het geruis van de snelle 7200-RPM-HDD is ook hoorbaar in inactieve toestand.

Een ander nadeel is het materiaalgebruik: de laptop trekt snel vuil en vingerafdrukken aan en moet regelmatig schoongemaakt worden. Een laptop voor 3000 euro zou ook over Thunderbolt 3 mogen beschikken. We zijn niet zeker waar het ontbreken van G-Sync aan te wijten is. De notebook is relatief compact voor een 17-inch-toestel, maar mobiliteit mag zeker geen prioriteit zijn voor potentiële kopers. 

De GPU-upgrade voor de MSI GE75 Raider is een goede investering, aangezien de extra prestaties ook effectief benut kunnen worden, ondanks de slanke behuizing. Er zijn een aantal tekortkomingen op het vlak van connectiviteit, maar we ondervinden geen grote problemen die de gaming-prestaties zouden kunnen beïnvloeden.

MSI GE75 8SG Raider - 25-03-2019 v6
Andreas Osthoff

Behuizing
76 / 98 → 78%
Toetsenbord
85%
Aanwijsapparaat
89%
Aansluitmogelijkheden
63 / 81 → 78%
Gewicht
59 / 10-66 → 87%
Batterij
79%
Beeldscherm
90%
Gaming-performance
100%
Applicatie-performance
94%
Temperatuur
84 / 95 → 88%
Luidheid
61 / 90 → 68%
Audio
86%
Gemiddelde
81%
88%
Gaming - Gewogen Gemiddelde

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Overzichten en testrapporten over laptops en mobieltjes > Testrapporten > Kort testrapport MSI GE75 8SG Raider (i7-8750H, RTX 2080) Laptop
Andreas Osthoff, 2019-03-27 (Update: 2019-03-28)