Samsung Galaxy J5 2016

Laptopspecificaties

Pricecompare

Testrapporten voor de Samsung Galaxy J5 2016

80% Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 review: niet echt anders
Bron: All About Phones Archive.org version
Mijn conclusie over de J5 2016 is louter positief, al kan ik niet ontkennen dat je (veel) betere smartphones kunt kopen voor minder geld. Maar deze smartphones zijn dan ook eerder ‘uitzonderingen’. Algemeen gezien behoort de J5 2016 nog altijd tot de top van het midrange /low-end segment.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 17-10-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80%

Anderstalige testrapporten

80% Samsung Galaxy J5 review
Bron: It Pro EN→NL Archive.org version
The third-gen Moto G just retains its place in our budget smartphone affections thanks to its classier looks and build quality as well as its clean version of Android and waterproofing. Even so, the J5 has a lot going for it and is a very good alternative if you want a better looking screen and a replaceable battery.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 16-07-2018
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80%

80% Samsung Galaxy J5 review
Bron: It Pro EN→NL Archive.org version
The Moto G series has been the gold standard in budget smartphones, but the Samsung Galaxy J5 is a great alternative thanks to its superlative screen and long lasting battery. It's an excellent choice for anyone who's looking for quality on a budget. Having said all that, it’s worth waiting for the new 2016 Moto G4 (the fourth generation Moto G) which is due any day now. Unless you need a cheap phone right away, it’s worth waiting to see if the now Lenovo-owned Motorola can continue its success streak.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 20-03-2017
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80%

80% Samsung Galaxy J5 review
Bron: It Pro EN→NL Archive.org version
The third-gen Moto G just retains its place in our budget smartphone affections thanks to its classier looks and build quality as well as its clean version of Android and waterproofing. Even so, the J5 has a lot going for it and is a very good alternative if you want a better looking screen and a replaceable battery.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer kort, Datum: 19-10-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80%

100% Samsung Galaxy J5 review: A good alternative to the Moto G4
Bron: Expert Reviews EN→NL Archive.org version
Despite this, it’s clear that the Motorola Moto G4 is the phone to beat in the budget smartphone space right now. But that’s not to say there are no reasons to choose the Samsung Galaxy J5. It remains a good option if you value screen quality and battery life above all else. You might prefer it if you're switching across from another Samsung handset and don't fancy changing to a different manufacturer. And you might prefer a smaller handset; the Samsung Galaxy J5 is more compact, more easily usable in one hand and easier to slip into a pocket. Despite the emergence of the Moto G4, then, it hangs on to its Recommended award.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 07-10-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 100%

A decent choice for everyday usage
Bron: Tech Nave EN→NL Archive.org version
We are living in a world where sub-RM1000 smartphones are coming out with features taken from flagships that were around scantly a couple of years ago. This scenario has created phones such as the Honor 5X, Vivo X3, Xiaomi Redmi Note 3, Alcatel Flash Plus 2 and so on. Samsung has a tough road ahead to go against the pack with the Samsung Galaxy J5 (2016), but we think they can do it - while breaking some sweat, especially for Samsung fans looking for an affordable metal frame Samsung phone.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 11-09-2016

Samsung Galaxy J5 (2016) Review
Bron: Yugatech EN→NL Archive.org version
As we wrap up the review, we can say that the Galaxy J5 (2016) is a well-built phone with decent specs. Although, a usual concern for most thrifty consumers is the pricing of the device. For something this underpowered yet encased in an above average body and topped with a vibrant display, the brand is asking for Php11,990. The official pricing may have put a frown on some but rest assured, it’s a pretty good handset with nifty features crafted for everyday use.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 23-08-2016

73% The gateway to the Galaxy
Bron: KL Gadget Guy EN→NL Archive.org version
Make no mistake, with an asking price of RM799 for the J5 and RM999 for the J7, you're pretty much paying a premium for the Samsung brand instead of actual performance. If you're one of those people that wouldn't be caught dead with a phone that isn't from a well recognized international brand, the J5 and J7 can be considered. However, if the Samsung name doesn't mean all that much to you, then you should probably opt for one of the many entry/mid-level smartphones that come from brands located in mainland China.
Vergelijking, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 22-08-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 73% prijs: 80% prestatie: 75% functionaliteiten: 75% mobiliteit: 75% afwerking: 80%

80% Samsung Galaxy J5
Bron: It Pro EN→NL Archive.org version
The third-gen Moto G just retains its place in our budget smartphone affections thanks to its classier looks and build quality as well as its clean version of Android and waterproofing. Even so, the J5 has a lot going for it and is a very good alternative if you want a better looking screen and a replaceable battery.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 15-08-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80%

Worthy successor to an affordable and popular smartphone
Bron: Laptop Media EN→NL Archive.org version
The Samsung Galaxy J lineup proved yet again that affordability and reliability can coexist successfully. After Galaxy J7 and Galaxy J3 performed very well in our reviews, Galaxy J5 (2016) did not let us down, either. On the contrary, it has great features for the asking price. This is a model with nice design, thin profile and metal frame. It offers a 5.2-inch Super AMOLED HD display which is a very good choice both in terms of size and of image quality.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 04-07-2016

60% Samsung Galaxy J5 (2016) Review
Bron: Phone Arena EN→NL Archive.org version
The Samsung Galaxy J5 (2016) is a smartphone of reasonably good quality. It looks elegant and its screen is fairly pleasant. Its software experience is well-accomplished and its camera can land surprisingly good shots. While the Galaxy J5 (2016) does cover the essentials, it does so with the absolute minimum amount of design flair and hardware power required. Priced at around $255 in Asia and €280 in Europe, it becomes easy prey for comparably priced alternatives that present better value for money.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 20-06-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 60%

80% x 03-06-2016
Bron: It Pro EN→NL Archive.org version
The third-gen Moto G just retains its place in our budget smartphone affections thanks to its classier looks and build quality as well as its clean version of Android and waterproofing. Even so, the J5 has a lot going for it and is a very good alternative if you want a better looking screen and a replaceable battery.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 03-06-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80%

59% Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 Review
Bron: Think Digit EN→NL Archive.org version
The Samsung Galaxy J5 (2016) is not the smartphone you should buy. It is quite underpowered compared to other offerings in the market, doesn't have a fingerprint sensor, and its pros don't outweigh the cons. The compromise isn't worth Samsung's brand value.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 30-05-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 59%

Samsung Galaxy J5 (2016) Review
Bron: GSM Arena EN→NL Archive.org version
As far as the design is concerned the Samsung Galaxy J5 (2016) lays a solid foundation for the company's upcoming mid-range smartphones. There'll be few people to complain as the phone looks better than its price tag suggests and is rocking top-notch build quality. However, in terms of hardware the Galaxy J5 (2016) feels like a pretty minor update. The bigger screen and battery are always a good way to lure customers in, but the chipset is feeling decidedly dated at this point. And the camera certainly can't live up to the promises that its specs make.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 25-05-2016

90% Samsung Galaxy J5 Review: In Depth
Bron: Recombu EN→NL Archive.org version
At this price, the Galaxy J5 is a very strong rival for the Moto G and other cut-price handsets. It's a solid all-rounder, offering dependable performance and excellent battery life as well as some brilliant camera tech. We prefer the vanilla Android Marshmallow experience of the Moto G, but Sammy fans will love what the Galaxy J5 has to offer.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 16-05-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 90%

100% A cracking budget handset
Bron: PC Pro EN→NL Archive.org version
It’s a shame to end on the slight downer of the camera because it’s the only area where the Samsung Galaxy J5 puts a foot wrong as far as I’m concerned. Usually, when I’ve reviewed a budget handset, I’m extremely eager to get back to my own phone, but in this instance, I’ll actually be a little sad to see the back of the J5. It’s smooth, stylish, and performs nicely with a bright screen and an incredible battery life. On one such day when I barely used the phone, it lost just 3% of its life from sitting in standby.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer kort, Datum: 29-04-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 100%

86% Samsung Galaxy J5 (2016)
Bron: Computerbild - 2/2017
Enkel testrapport, , Lengte onbekend, Datum: 15-01-2017
Beoordeling: Totale score: 86%

78% Everybody's darling
Bron: Netzwelt DE→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 12-11-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 78% functionaliteiten: 60% mobiliteit: 90% afwerking: 80%

71% Samsung Galaxy J5 (2016), análisis y opinión
Bron: Computerhoy ES→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 19-12-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 71% prijs: 60% functionaliteiten: 60% beeldscherm: 80% mobiliteit: 90% afwerking: 70%

Samsung Galaxy J5 (2016) Ventajas y Desventajas a Fondo
Bron: Mi Mundo Gadget ES→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 22-11-2016

Características Del Nuevo Samsung Galaxy J5 (2016)
Bron: Descargar.mobi ES→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 15-02-2016

Test Samsung Galaxy J5 (2016)
Bron: CNet France FR→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 14-10-2016

75% Krótki test smartfonu Samsung Galaxy J5
Bron: Komputerswiat PL→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 04-02-2017
Beoordeling: Totale score: 75% functionaliteiten: 73%

67% Recenzja Samsung Galaxy J5: Przeciętniak w (prawie) każdym calu
Bron: Teleguru PL→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 06-12-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 67% prestatie: 80% beeldscherm: 70% mobiliteit: 60% afwerking: 50%

Samsung Galaxy J5 (2016) – godny następca czy odcinacz kuponów?
Bron: Komputerswiat PL→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer kort, Datum: 17-08-2016

80% Samsung Galaxy J5 – 2016
Bron: Tekno Seyir TR→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 16-03-2017
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80%

Đánh giá Samsung Galaxy J5 (2016): đủ dùng phổ thông, pin tốt, chơi game đuối
Bron: VNReview VN→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 22-08-2016

Review Samsung Galaxy J5: Low-End Samsung Jagokan Layar AMOLED
Bron: Jagat Review ID→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 15-09-2016

92% Samsung Galaxy J5 2016: Samsung pre menej náročných | RECENZIA
Bron: Moj Android SK→NL Archive.org version
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 30-08-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 92% prestatie: 81% beeldscherm: 82% mobiliteit: 92% afwerking: 80%

Commentaar

Qualcomm Adreno 306:

Deze grafische kaarten voor notebooks zijn niet bruikbaar voor games. Als ze al games kunnen draaien, dan doen ze dat met grafische afwijkingen en heel lage framesnelheid. Voor gamers zijn deze chips ongeschikt! Kantoor en internet taken zijn, daarentegen, geen probleem voor deze GPUs.

>> Meer informatie kan gevonden worden in ons Vergelijk van Mobiele Grafische Kaarten en de passende Benchmark Tabel.

410 MSM8916:
>> Meer informatie kan gevonden worden in ons Vergelijk van Mobiele Processors.

5.20": Dit scherm is al redelijk groot voor een smartphone, maar wordt veelvuldig toegepast.

Grote schermformaten laten hogere resoluties toe. Details zoals letters zijn groter. Anderzijds is het energieverbruik lager bij kleine schermdiagonalen en de toestellen zijn kleiner, lichter en goedkoper.
>>Om de fijnheid van het scherm te vinden, kijk in onze DPI-lijst.

Samsung: Samsung Group is het grootste Zuid-Koreaanse conglomeraat en werd opgericht in 1938. Samsung Group had in 2014 489.000 mensen in dienst en is een van 's werelds grootste bedrijven in termen van omzet en marktsterkte. De naam Samsung betekent "Drie Sterren" in het Koreaans en staat voor de drie zonen van de oprichter van het bedrijf. Het bedrijf werd in 1938 opgericht als kruidenierswinkel. Met haar dochteronderneming Samsung Electronics, opgericht in 1969, begon Samsung met de productie van elektrotechnische artikelen, met de focus op consumentenelektronica en huishoudelijke apparaten in een vroeg stadium. Andere branches waarin het grote concern actief is, zijn onder meer machinebouw, auto's (Hyundai), verzekeringen, groothandel, onroerend goed en vrije tijd. Samsung produceert een breed scala aan elektronische producten, waaronder smartphones, televisies, huishoudelijke apparaten en halfgeleiders. De Galaxy-smartphonelijn van het bedrijf is een van de meest populaire ter wereld. Samsung is ook een belangrijke speler in de halfgeleiderindustrie en maakt geheugenchips en processors voor veel andere elektronicafabrikanten.

79.67%: Dit cijfer is niet echt overtuigend. Het moet in acht worden genomen dat er bijna geen laptops zijn die een score onder de 60% hebben. Dit notebook is beneden gemiddeld beoordeeld, en is niet aanbevolen te kopen.

>> De verdere informatie kan worden gevonden in onze hulp voor de aankoop van laptops.

Vergelijkbare notebooks met gelijke specificaties

Vergelijkbare notebooks van een andere fabrikant

Laptops van een andere fabrikant en met een andere CPU

Laptops met dezelfde grafische kaart

Laptops met dezelfde schermgrootte en gewicht