LG X Screen
Laptopspecificaties

Secundaire Camera: 8 MPix
Price comparison
Gemiddelde van 23 score (van 39 beoordelingen)
Testrapporten voor de LG X Screen
Two for a better view? LG's X screen is equipped with two screens for little money. But just how useful is this feature in everyday use? We found out in our test.
Bron: Nieuwe Mobiel.nl
Archive.org versionLG heeft het idee opgevat om onderscheidende hardware van haar high-end toestellen in midrange modellen te plaatsen. Zo is er de LG X cam met een dubbele camera en de door ons geteste LG X screen met een tweede scherm.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer kort, Datum: 30-08-2016
Anderstalige testrapporten
Bron: What Mobile
EN→NL Archive.org versionThe LG X Screen is a good handset that comes at a bad time. With an outdated processor and stiff competition, the allure of a second display isn’t really enough to warrant purchase alone. The Lenovo Moto G4 can be had for practically the same price and trumps it in all areas, including screen, camera and processor capabilities. Had LG shipped this with a faster chipset, we’d be inclined to give it a higher score. As it is, there’s better value for money elsewhere.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 14-10-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 66% prijs: 60% prestatie: 60% beeldscherm: 65% afwerking: 65%
Bron: The Indian Express
EN→NL Archive.org versionLG X screen has a stylish form factor, decent camera and is good with multitasking. But I feel LG is asking for a bit too much of a price here for a phone that lacks full HD display and fingerprint scanner. The mid-budget segment is full of options like Moto G4 Plus, LeEco Le 1s and Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 which offer great specifications, including better camera.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer kort, Datum: 12-09-2016
Bron: Expert Reviews
EN→NL Archive.org versionThere's a lot to like about the LG X Screen, not least its handy extra screen and decent battery life. However, when the Moto G4 has a better camera, faster performance and a superior main display, the LG X Screen becomes a tough smartphone to recommend, unless you really fancy the idea of having an additional shortcut bar at the top of your screen. The LG X Screen might fill a small niche, then, but in terms of pure value for money, the Moto G4 still wins by a country mile.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 06-09-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 60%
Bron: Think Digit
EN→NL Archive.org versionThe LG X Screen tries to be different from the pack, and even though it is, the lack of processing power, a sub-par camera and weakened battery life makes it inferior to fellow mid-range smartphones like the LeEco Le 2, Xiaomi Redmi Note 3, Moto G4 Plus and Honor 5C.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 23-08-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 61%
Bron: NDTV Gadgets
EN→NL Archive.org versionAfter spending a good amount of time with the X screen, we wish more manufactures implemented this concept. Having a second screen constantly displaying basic, relevant information is a real boon and the ability to quickly jump between apps and features is a real time-saver. It just would have been a lot better with a OLED panel rather than a LCD one.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 19-08-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 70% prijs: 60% prestatie: 70% beeldscherm: 70% mobiliteit: 90% afwerking: 80%
Bron: NDTV Gadgets
EN→NL Archive.org versionWe believe that the biggest challenge for LG's new X screen will be to take on the popular phones in the segment such as the Moto G4 Plus and the Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 which obviously offer better specifications. We will have to wait to see how well LG's new X screen performs in the Indian market.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer kort, Datum: 21-07-2016
Bron: Techradar
EN→NL Archive.org versionIf you're looking for an affordable Android phone with a solid design, strong performance, sterling battery life, and a competent camera, the LG X Screen is a reasonable choice. However, the headline-grabbing second screen is a bit of a gimmick, and its 8MP selfie camera isn't as sharp as you might be hoping.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 22-06-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 60%
Bron: Recombu
EN→NL Archive.org versionIf it wasn't for the LG X Screen's second display, it would be a pretty bog-standard mid-range mobile. Performance is fine and battery life is about average, while the main 4.93-inch screen is a bit washed out and inferior to rivals like the Galaxy J5. Still, that secondary display is a cool feature that's genuinely useful; but you'll really need to want it to choose the X Screen over other handsets.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 13-05-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 60%
Bron: Area DVD
DE→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 20-04-2017
Bron: Chip.de
DE→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 07-12-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 69% prestatie: 80% functionaliteiten: 46% beeldscherm: 85% mobiliteit: 60%
Bron: Connect - 01/2017

Enkel testrapport, , Lengte onbekend, Datum: 01-12-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 83%
Bron: Stiftung Warentest - Heft 11/2016

Enkel testrapport, , Lengte onbekend, Datum: 01-10-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 79% mobiliteit: 69%
Bron: Smartphone Magazin - Heft 05/2016

Enkel testrapport, , Lengte onbekend, Datum: 01-09-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 87%
Bron: WinFuture
DE→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 12-08-2016
Bron: Tech Stage
DE→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 15-07-2016
Bron: WinFuture
DE→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 11-07-2016
Bron: PocketPC
DE→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 06-07-2016
Bron: PocketPC
DE→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 06-07-2016
Bron: Connect - Heft 8/2016

Enkel testrapport, , Lengte onbekend, Datum: 01-07-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 83%
Bron: Android Mag
DE→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 29-06-2016
Bron: Ubergismo Deutsch
DE→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 24-06-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80%
Bron: Android User
DE→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 23-06-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 78% prijs: 100% beeldscherm: 100% mobiliteit: 70%
Bron: MobiFlip
DE→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 15-06-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 70%
Bron: PC Welt
DE→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 07-06-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 86% prestatie: 80% functionaliteiten: 93% beeldscherm: 85% mobiliteit: 90%
Bron: SFT - Heft 7/2016

Enkel testrapport, , Lengte onbekend, Datum: 01-06-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 88%
Bron: Android Pit
DE→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 01-06-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 70%
Bron: A1 Blog
DE→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 01-06-2016
Bron: Notebooksbilliger Blog
DE→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 27-05-2016
Bron: Turn On
DE→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 24-05-2016
Bron: Inside Handy
DE→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 23-05-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 60%
Bron: Android Magazin - Heft 3/2016

Enkel testrapport, , Lengte onbekend, Datum: 01-05-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 60%
Bron: Smartphone Magazin - Heft 5/2016

Enkel testrapport, , Lengte onbekend, Datum: 01-04-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 87%
Bron: eTest
DE→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 22-03-2016
Bron: Log.com.tr
TR→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer kort, Datum: 09-08-2016
Bron: Tek.no
NO→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 23-08-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 60%
Bron: Techbox
SK→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer kort, Datum: 15-08-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 70%
Commentaar
Qualcomm Adreno 306:
Deze grafische kaarten voor notebooks zijn niet bruikbaar voor games. Als ze al games kunnen draaien, dan doen ze dat met grafische afwijkingen en heel lage framesnelheid. Voor gamers zijn deze chips ongeschikt! Kantoor en internet taken zijn, daarentegen, geen probleem voor deze GPUs.
>> Meer informatie kan gevonden worden in ons Vergelijk van Mobiele Grafische Kaarten en de passende Benchmark Tabel.
410 MSM8916:
>> Meer informatie kan gevonden worden in ons Vergelijk van Mobiele Processors.