Notebookcheck

Kort testrapport Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite Smartphone

Mike Wobker, 👁 Daniel Schmidt, Andrea Grüblinger, 27-01-2019

Gewoon goed. De smartphone van Xiaomi met wereldwijde ROM is eindelijk op de Europese markt uitgebracht. De Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite is een goede en hoogwaardige smartphone voor het kleine budget. Lees ons testrapport om te ontdekken wat u kunt verwachten van dit apparaat van €270.

Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite (Mi Serie)
Grafische kaart
Qualcomm Adreno 512
Geheugen
6144 MB 
, LPDDR4
Beeldscherm
6.26 inch 19:9, 2280 x 1080 pixel 403 PPI, capacitief touchscreen, IPS, glimmend: ja
Opslag
128 GB eMMC Flash, 128 GB 
, 112 GB beschikbaar
Verbindingen
1 USB 2.0, Audio Verbindingen: USB Type-C, Card Reader: microSD, 1 Vingerafdruklezer, Brightness Sensor, Sensoren: bewegingssensor, gyroscoop, nabijheidssensor, kompas
Netwerkmogelijkheden
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.0, GSM (B2/B3/B5/B8), 3G WCDMA (B1/B2/B4/B5/B8), 4G LTE FDD/TDD (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B20/B28/B38/B40), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Afmetingen
hoogte x breedte x diepte (in mm): 7.5 x 156.4 x 75.8
Batterij
3350 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Besturingssysteem
Android 8.1 Oreo
Camera
Primary Camera: 12 MPix 12MP/f1.9/1.4µm + 5MP/f2.0/1.12µm (SAMSUNG S5K5E8)
Secondary Camera: 24 MPix f2.0/1.8µm (Sony IMX 576)
Bijkomende functionaliteiten
Luidsprekers: 1 luidspreker, Toetsenbord: virtueel, Toetsenbordverlichting: ja, USB lader, USB Type-C kabel, USB-C naar 3.5mm audiokabel adapter, beschermhoes, SIM tool, MIUI Global 10.0, 12 Maanden Garantie, SAR-waardes (head): 0,749 W/kg, SAR-value (body): 1,585 W/kg, fanless
Gewicht
169 g, Voeding: 64 g
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite

Size Comparison

159.8 mm 76.8 mm 7.5 mm 168 g158.5 mm 75.4 mm 8.3 mm 175 g156.4 mm 75.8 mm 7.5 mm 169 g155.2 mm 73.4 mm 7.95 mm 160 g153.4 mm 74.4 mm 8.3 mm 165 g149.5 mm 72 mm 8.1 mm 162 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Adreno 512, 660, 128 GB eMMC Flash
356 (min: 342, max: 371) MBit/s ∼100%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
Mali-G72 MP3, Helio P60, 32 GB eMMC Flash
337 (min: 318, max: 347) MBit/s ∼95% -5%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
Mali-G72 MP3, Helio P60, 128 GB eMMC Flash
336 (min: 200, max: 344) MBit/s ∼94% -6%
HTC U12 Life
Adreno 509, 636, 64 GB eMMC Flash
330 (min: 63, max: 342) MBit/s ∼93% -7%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Mali-G71 MP2, 7885, 64 GB eMMC Flash
279 (min: 265, max: 284) MBit/s ∼78% -22%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 939, n=419)
223 MBit/s ∼63% -37%
Huawei P Smart 2019
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
164 (min: 28, max: 206) MBit/s ∼46% -54%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Umidigi Z2 Pro
Mali-G72 MP3, Helio P60, 128 GB eMMC Flash
335 (min: 313, max: 342) MBit/s ∼100% +18%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Mali-G71 MP2, 7885, 64 GB eMMC Flash
320 (min: 164, max: 362) MBit/s ∼96% +12%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
Mali-G72 MP3, Helio P60, 32 GB eMMC Flash
312 (min: 121, max: 348) MBit/s ∼93% +9%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Adreno 512, 660, 128 GB eMMC Flash
285 (min: 142, max: 294) MBit/s ∼85%
HTC U12 Life
Adreno 509, 636, 64 GB eMMC Flash
259 (min: 252, max: 263) MBit/s ∼77% -9%
Huawei P Smart 2019
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
226 (min: 197, max: 262) MBit/s ∼67% -21%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 703, n=419)
212 MBit/s ∼63% -26%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø356 (342-371)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø281 (142-294)
GPS - Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
GPS - Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
GPS - Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
GPS - Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
GPS - Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
GPS - Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
GPS - Garmin Edge 500
GPS - Garmin Edge 500
GPS - Garmin Edge 500
GPS - Garmin Edge 500
GPS - Garmin Edge 500
GPS - Garmin Edge 500

Beeldvergelijking

Bekijk een scène en navigeer binnen het eerste beeld. Eén klik wijzigt het zoomniveau. Eén klik op het ingezoomde beeld opent het origineel in een nieuw venster. Het eerste beeld toont de verschaalde foto van het testtoestel.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
klik om beelden te laden
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite - Testkaart
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite - Testkaart (Detail)
386
cd/m²
409
cd/m²
396
cd/m²
364
cd/m²
421
cd/m²
388
cd/m²
358
cd/m²
407
cd/m²
371
cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 421 cd/m² Gemiddelde: 388.9 cd/m² Minimum: 0.91 cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling: 85 %
Helderheid in Batterij-modus: 421 cd/m²
Contrast: 1276:1 (Zwart: 0.33 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.4 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6.1
ΔE Greyscale 3.9 | 0.64-98 Ø6.3
99.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.26
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
IPS, 2280x1080, 6.26
Huawei P Smart 2019
IPS, 2340x1080, 6.2
Umidigi Z2 Pro
IPS, 2246x1080, 6.2
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Super AMOLED, 2220x1080, 6
HTC U12 Life
IPS, 2160x1080, 6
Nokia 5.1 Plus
IPS, 1520x720, 5.8
Screen
19%
-51%
42%
-40%
-8%
Brightness middle
421
458
9%
479
14%
570
35%
468
11%
513
22%
Brightness
389
440
13%
466
20%
565
45%
452
16%
502
29%
Brightness Distribution
85
85
0%
73
-14%
93
9%
90
6%
89
5%
Black Level *
0.33
0.35
-6%
0.27
18%
0.62
-88%
0.36
-9%
Contrast
1276
1309
3%
1774
39%
755
-41%
1425
12%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
3.4
1.4
59%
8.2
-141%
1.5
56%
6.09
-79%
5.2
-53%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
5.9
3.8
36%
16.2
-175%
3.6
39%
10.23
-73%
9.8
-66%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
3.9
2.4
38%
10.5
-169%
1.2
69%
6.8
-74%
4.1
-5%
Gamma
2.26 97%
2.22 99%
2.47 89%
2.07 106%
2.708 81%
2.33 94%
CCT
7330 89%
6235 104%
9193 71%
6504 100%
6972 93%
7423 88%

* ... kleiner is beter

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Om de schermhelderheid te verlagen schakelen sommige laptops het backlight erg snel aan en uit. Dit gebeurt aan een dergelijk hoge frequentie dat het niet zichtbaar is voor het menselijk oog. Als de frequentie te laag is kunnen personen met gevoelige ogen geïrriteerd geraken, hoofdpijn krijgen en zelfs flickering waarnemen.
Screen flickering / PWM waargenomen 2358 Hz ≤ 18 % helderheid instelling

Het backlight van het scherm flikkert aan 2358 Hz (hoogstwaarschijnlijk met PWM - Pulse-Width Modulation) aan een helderheid van 18 % en lager. Boven deze helderheid zou er geen flickering / PWM mogen optreden.

De frequentie van 2358 Hz is redelijk hoog en de meeste mensen die gevoelig zijn aan flickering zouden dit dus niet mogen waarnemen of geïrriteerde ogen krijgen.

Ter vergelijking: 51 % van alle geteste toestellen maakten geen gebruik van PWM om de schermhelderheid te verlagen. Als het wel werd gebruikt, werd een gemiddelde van 9418 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz waargenomen.

Responstijd Scherm

De responstijden van het scherm tonen hoe snel het scherm in staat is om van één kleur naar de andere te veranderen. Trage responstijden kunnen aanleiding geven tot 'nabeelden' rond bewegende objecten of het scherm wazig maken (blur). Vooral spelers van snelle 3D-games hebben baat bij een scherm met snelle responstijden.
       Responstijd Zwart naar Wit
32 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd↗ 13.2 ms stijging
↘ 18.8 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde trage responstijden in onze tests en is misschien te traag voor games.
Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.8 (minimum) tot 240 (maximum) ms. » 82 % van alle toestellen zijn beter.
Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd slechter is dan het gemiddelde (25.1 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.
       Responstijd 50% Grijs naar 80% Grijs
60.4 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd↗ 28.8 ms stijging
↘ 31.6 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde trage responstijden in onze tests en is misschien te traag voor games.
Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.9 (minimum) tot 636 (maximum) ms. » 95 % van alle toestellen zijn beter.
Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd slechter is dan het gemiddelde (40 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.
Geekbench 4.3
Compute RenderScript Score (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
5640 Points ∼100%
Huawei P Smart 2019
3157 Points ∼56% -44%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
4026 Points ∼71% -29%
HTC U12 Life
4465 Points ∼79% -21%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
Points ∼0% -100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (4983 - 5811, n=9)
5524 Points ∼98% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (663 - 21070, n=317)
4565 Points ∼81% -19%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
5893 Points ∼100%
Huawei P Smart 2019
5407 Points ∼92% -8%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
4429 Points ∼75% -25%
HTC U12 Life
4914 Points ∼83% -17%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
Points ∼0% -100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (4895 - 5913, n=11)
5694 Points ∼97% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (1174 - 11598, n=375)
4601 Points ∼78% -22%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
1621 Points ∼100%
Huawei P Smart 2019
1527 Points ∼94% -6%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
1525 Points ∼94% -6%
HTC U12 Life
1338 Points ∼83% -17%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
Points ∼0% -100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (1431 - 1646, n=11)
1598 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (691 - 4824, n=377)
1374 Points ∼85% -15%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
6052 Points ∼82%
Huawei P Smart 2019
5951 Points ∼81% -2%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
7384 Points ∼100% +22%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
5387 Points ∼73% -11%
HTC U12 Life
5730 Points ∼78% -5%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
7021 Points ∼95% +16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (5789 - 6187, n=10)
6022 Points ∼82% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (3227 - 11440, n=373)
5046 Points ∼68% -17%
Work performance score (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
6274 Points ∼63%
Huawei P Smart 2019
7078 Points ∼72% +13%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
9893 Points ∼100% +58%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
5625 Points ∼57% -10%
HTC U12 Life
6412 Points ∼65% +2%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
9065 Points ∼92% +44%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (6274 - 7026, n=10)
6654 Points ∼67% +6%
Average of class Smartphone (4096 - 14439, n=541)
5537 Points ∼56% -12%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
2758 Points ∼100%
Huawei P Smart 2019
2085 Points ∼76% -24%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
2013 Points ∼73% -27%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
1845 Points ∼67% -33%
HTC U12 Life
2386 Points ∼87% -13%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
2377 Points ∼86% -14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (2121 - 2797, n=10)
2654 Points ∼96% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (573 - 4535, n=387)
1834 Points ∼66% -34%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
1265 Points ∼79%
Huawei P Smart 2019
838 Points ∼52% -34%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
881 Points ∼55% -30%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
629 Points ∼39% -50%
HTC U12 Life
869 Points ∼54% -31%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
721 Points ∼45% -43%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (1134 - 1268, n=10)
1235 Points ∼77% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (76 - 8206, n=387)
1602 Points ∼100% +27%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
1438 Points ∼97%
Huawei P Smart 2019
966 Points ∼65% -33%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
1007 Points ∼68% -30%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
737 Points ∼49% -49%
HTC U12 Life
1012 Points ∼68% -30%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
853 Points ∼57% -41%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (1270 - 1442, n=10)
1403 Points ∼94% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (94 - 6312, n=390)
1489 Points ∼100% +4%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
2751 Points ∼99%
Huawei P Smart 2019
2459 Points ∼89% -11%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
2765 Points ∼100% +1%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
1871 Points ∼68% -32%
HTC U12 Life
2343 Points ∼85% -15%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
2388 Points ∼86% -13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (2238 - 2815, n=10)
2700 Points ∼98% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (375 - 4703, n=402)
1811 Points ∼65% -34%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
2015 Points ∼92%
Huawei P Smart 2019
1225 Points ∼56% -39%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
1423 Points ∼65% -29%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
954 Points ∼44% -53%
HTC U12 Life
1403 Points ∼64% -30%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
1159 Points ∼53% -42%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (1734 - 2033, n=10)
1934 Points ∼89% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (131 - 14951, n=402)
2185 Points ∼100% +8%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
2142 Points ∼100%
Huawei P Smart 2019
1379 Points ∼64% -36%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
1595 Points ∼74% -26%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
1071 Points ∼50% -50%
HTC U12 Life
1540 Points ∼72% -28%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
1309 Points ∼61% -39%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (1887 - 2151, n=10)
2055 Points ∼96% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (159 - 8141, n=403)
1860 Points ∼87% -13%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
2759 Points ∼100%
Huawei P Smart 2019
2392 Points ∼87% -13%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
2512 Points ∼91% -9%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
1821 Points ∼66% -34%
HTC U12 Life
2281 Points ∼83% -17%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
2149 Points ∼78% -22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (1883 - 2759, n=10)
2573 Points ∼93% -7%
Average of class Smartphone (486 - 4320, n=463)
1772 Points ∼64% -36%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
1193 Points ∼89%
Huawei P Smart 2019
703 Points ∼53% -41%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
815 Points ∼61% -32%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
634 Points ∼48% -47%
HTC U12 Life
815 Points ∼61% -32%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
657 Points ∼49% -45%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (1061 - 1201, n=10)
1173 Points ∼88% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (65 - 6362, n=465)
1334 Points ∼100% +12%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
1365 Points ∼100%
Huawei P Smart 2019
834 Points ∼61% -39%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
959 Points ∼70% -30%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
741 Points ∼54% -46%
HTC U12 Life
951 Points ∼70% -30%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
777 Points ∼57% -43%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (1175 - 1372, n=11)
1339 Points ∼98% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (80 - 5734, n=473)
1273 Points ∼93% -7%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
2719 Points ∼100%
Huawei P Smart 2019
2381 Points ∼88% -12%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
2587 Points ∼95% -5%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
1829 Points ∼67% -33%
HTC U12 Life
2364 Points ∼87% -13%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
2159 Points ∼79% -21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (2383 - 2834, n=10)
2700 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (512 - 4454, n=496)
1680 Points ∼62% -38%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
1929 Points ∼100%
Huawei P Smart 2019
683 Points ∼35% -65%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
1112 Points ∼58% -42%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
845 Points ∼44% -56%
HTC U12 Life
1336 Points ∼69% -31%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
983 Points ∼51% -49%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (1711 - 1938, n=10)
1891 Points ∼98% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (43 - 10008, n=496)
1803 Points ∼93% -7%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
2062 Points ∼100%
Huawei P Smart 2019
812 Points ∼39% -61%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
1273 Points ∼62% -38%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
960 Points ∼47% -53%
HTC U12 Life
1479 Points ∼72% -28%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
1118 Points ∼54% -46%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (1825 - 2073, n=10)
2025 Points ∼98% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (55 - 7820, n=504)
1549 Points ∼75% -25%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
20437 Points ∼86%
Huawei P Smart 2019
11212 Points ∼47% -45%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
23697 Points ∼100% +16%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
13914 Points ∼59% -32%
HTC U12 Life
16924 Points ∼71% -17%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
18065 Points ∼76% -12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (15088 - 21016, n=10)
19357 Points ∼82% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (4811 - 45072, n=654)
13712 Points ∼58% -33%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
29116 Points ∼100%
Huawei P Smart 2019
19510 Points ∼67% -33%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
20991 Points ∼72% -28%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
15567 Points ∼53% -47%
HTC U12 Life
20778 Points ∼71% -29%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
16820 Points ∼58% -42%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (25561 - 29496, n=10)
28566 Points ∼98% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (7567 - 162695, n=654)
20179 Points ∼69% -31%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
26605 Points ∼100%
Huawei P Smart 2019
16754 Points ∼63% -37%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
21538 Points ∼81% -19%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
15167 Points ∼57% -43%
HTC U12 Life
19777 Points ∼74% -26%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
17082 Points ∼64% -36%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (22145 - 26731, n=10)
25808 Points ∼97% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (8316 - 83518, n=655)
16716 Points ∼63% -37%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
50 fps ∼100%
Huawei P Smart 2019
39 fps ∼78% -22%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
37 fps ∼74% -26%
HTC U12 Life
36 fps ∼72% -28%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
30 fps ∼60% -40%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (43 - 51, n=10)
48.2 fps ∼96% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (6 - 251, n=684)
35.2 fps ∼70% -30%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
47 fps ∼98%
Huawei P Smart 2019
36 fps ∼75% -23%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
31 fps ∼65% -34%
HTC U12 Life
35 fps ∼73% -26%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
40 fps ∼84% -15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (42 - 52, n=10)
47.8 fps ∼100% +2%
Average of class Smartphone (9.8 - 120, n=687)
27.1 fps ∼57% -42%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
22 fps ∼99%
Huawei P Smart 2019
21 fps ∼94% -5%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
20 fps ∼90% -9%
HTC U12 Life
16 fps ∼72% -27%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
16 fps ∼72% -27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (20 - 23, n=10)
22.3 fps ∼100% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (2.7 - 132, n=603)
19.4 fps ∼87% -12%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
21 fps ∼72%
Huawei P Smart 2019
19 fps ∼66% -10%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
18 fps ∼62% -14%
HTC U12 Life
15 fps ∼52% -29%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
29 fps ∼100% +38%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (19 - 23, n=10)
21.3 fps ∼73% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (5.4 - 115, n=608)
18 fps ∼62% -14%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
15 fps ∼94%
Huawei P Smart 2019
14 fps ∼88% -7%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
12 fps ∼75% -20%
HTC U12 Life
10 fps ∼63% -33%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
9.6 fps ∼60% -36%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (13 - 15, n=10)
14.5 fps ∼91% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (1.6 - 88, n=464)
15.9 fps ∼100% +6%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
14 fps ∼70%
Huawei P Smart 2019
13 fps ∼65% -7%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
11 fps ∼55% -21%
HTC U12 Life
9.8 fps ∼49% -30%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
20 fps ∼100% +43%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (12 - 15, n=11)
13.7 fps ∼69% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (3.4 - 110, n=467)
15.3 fps ∼77% +9%
GFXBench
High Tier Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
5.1 fps ∼57%
Huawei P Smart 2019
4.1 fps ∼46% -20%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
4.1 fps ∼46% -20%
HTC U12 Life
3.6 fps ∼40% -29%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
6.4 fps ∼72% +25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (3 - 6.3, n=5)
4.88 fps ∼55% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (0.86 - 59, n=167)
8.89 fps ∼100% +74%
2560x1440 High Tier Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
3.2 fps ∼52%
Huawei P Smart 2019
2.6 fps ∼42% -19%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
2.6 fps ∼42% -19%
HTC U12 Life
2.2 fps ∼36% -31%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
2.1 fps ∼34% -34%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (3.2 - 4.8, n=5)
3.52 fps ∼57% +10%
Average of class Smartphone (0.26 - 31, n=167)
6.16 fps ∼100% +93%
Normal Tier Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
8.1 fps ∼60%
Huawei P Smart 2019
6.4 fps ∼47% -21%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
6.6 fps ∼49% -19%
HTC U12 Life
5.7 fps ∼42% -30%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
8.6 fps ∼64% +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (7.5 - 9.7, n=5)
8.22 fps ∼61% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (1.8 - 59, n=168)
13.5 fps ∼100% +67%
1920x1080 Normal Tier Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
8.5 fps ∼58%
Huawei P Smart 2019
7 fps ∼48% -18%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
7.2 fps ∼49% -15%
HTC U12 Life
6 fps ∼41% -29%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
6.2 fps ∼42% -27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (8.5 - 8.7, n=5)
8.6 fps ∼59% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (0.94 - 63, n=168)
14.7 fps ∼100% +73%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
9 fps ∼84%
Huawei P Smart 2019
7.7 fps ∼72% -14%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
7.1 fps ∼66% -21%
HTC U12 Life
6.3 fps ∼59% -30%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
5.8 fps ∼54% -36%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (8.1 - 9.1, n=10)
8.88 fps ∼83% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (0.89 - 54, n=393)
10.7 fps ∼100% +19%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
8.4 fps ∼87%
Huawei P Smart 2019
6.8 fps ∼70% -19%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
6.7 fps ∼69% -20%
HTC U12 Life
6 fps ∼62% -29%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
7.4 fps ∼76% -12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (7.5 - 9.8, n=11)
8.58 fps ∼89% +2%
Average of class Smartphone (1.6 - 58, n=397)
9.69 fps ∼100% +15%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
143551 Points ∼100%
Huawei P Smart 2019
130070 Points ∼91% -9%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
137018 Points ∼95% -5%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
122826 Points ∼86% -14%
HTC U12 Life
116595 Points ∼81% -19%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
119367 Points ∼83% -17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (116346 - 143551, n=10)
137699 Points ∼96% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (52607 - 398720, n=286)
131662 Points ∼92% -8%
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
118773 Points ∼100%
Huawei P Smart 2019
104012 Points ∼88% -12%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
110668 Points ∼93% -7%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
87728 Points ∼74% -26%
HTC U12 Life
95287 Points ∼80% -20%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
91667 Points ∼77% -23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (105973 - 120479, n=11)
116194 Points ∼98% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (23275 - 283270, n=486)
86413 Points ∼73% -27%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
1086 Points ∼94%
Huawei P Smart 2019
982 Points ∼85% -10%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
1161 Points ∼100% +7%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
1090 Points ∼94% 0%
HTC U12 Life
1061 Points ∼91% -2%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
1083 Points ∼93% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (1027 - 1146, n=10)
1092 Points ∼94% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (7 - 1731, n=616)
747 Points ∼64% -31%
Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
2293 Points ∼100%
Huawei P Smart 2019
1469 Points ∼64% -36%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
1532 Points ∼67% -33%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
1356 Points ∼59% -41%
HTC U12 Life
1597 Points ∼70% -30%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
1262 Points ∼55% -45%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (1970 - 2332, n=10)
2257 Points ∼98% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (18 - 15969, n=616)
1965 Points ∼86% -14%
Memory (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
2269 Points ∼76%
Huawei P Smart 2019
2972 Points ∼100% +31%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
2721 Points ∼92% +20%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
2445 Points ∼82% +8%
HTC U12 Life
1979 Points ∼67% -13%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
2150 Points ∼72% -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (1737 - 2799, n=10)
2360 Points ∼79% +4%
Average of class Smartphone (21 - 7500, n=616)
1473 Points ∼50% -35%
System (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
5237 Points ∼100%
Huawei P Smart 2019
5074 Points ∼97% -3%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
3987 Points ∼76% -24%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
4506 Points ∼86% -14%
HTC U12 Life
4563 Points ∼87% -13%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
3817 Points ∼73% -27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (3745 - 5282, n=10)
4957 Points ∼95% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (369 - 12202, n=616)
2887 Points ∼55% -45%
Overall (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
2332 Points ∼100%
Huawei P Smart 2019
2159 Points ∼93% -7%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
2096 Points ∼90% -10%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
2009 Points ∼86% -14%
HTC U12 Life
1978 Points ∼85% -15%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
1830 Points ∼78% -22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (1905 - 2428, n=11)
2314 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (150 - 6097, n=620)
1437 Points ∼62% -38%

Legende

 
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Qualcomm Adreno 512, 128 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei P Smart 2019 HiSilicon Kirin 710, ARM Mali-G51 MP4, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Umidigi Z2 Pro Mediatek Helio P60, ARM Mali-G72 MP3, 128 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Samsung Exynos 7885, ARM Mali-G71 MP2, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
HTC U12 Life Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Qualcomm Adreno 509, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Nokia 5.1 Plus Mediatek Helio P60, ARM Mali-G72 MP3, 32 GB eMMC Flash
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite (Chrome 71)
52.897 Points ∼100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (45.3 - 55.5, n=10)
52.4 Points ∼99% -1%
Huawei P Smart 2019 (Chrome 70)
49.673 Points ∼94% -6%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 (Chrome 70)
47.986 Points ∼91% -9%
Umidigi Z2 Pro (Chrome 69)
45.789 Points ∼87% -13%
HTC U12 Life (Chrome 70)
44.314 Points ∼84% -16%
Nokia 5.1 Plus (Chrome 71)
41.675 Points ∼79% -21%
Average of class Smartphone (12 - 273, n=516)
39.1 Points ∼74% -26%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite (Chrome 71)
10378 Points ∼100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (8463 - 10945, n=11)
10080 Points ∼97% -3%
Huawei P Smart 2019 (Chrome 70)
9708 Points ∼94% -6%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 (Chrome 70)
9165 Points ∼88% -12%
HTC U12 Life (Chrome 70)
9121 Points ∼88% -12%
Nokia 5.1 Plus (Chrome 71)
8744 Points ∼84% -16%
Umidigi Z2 Pro (Chrome 69)
8626 Points ∼83% -17%
Average of class Smartphone (1994 - 43280, n=677)
6359 Points ∼61% -39%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (603 - 59466, n=697)
10720 ms * ∼100% -176%
HTC U12 Life (Chrome 70)
4757.5 ms * ∼44% -23%
Nokia 5.1 Plus (Chrome 71)
4611.2 ms * ∼43% -19%
Umidigi Z2 Pro (Chrome 69)
4309 ms * ∼40% -11%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 (Chrome 70)
4122.8 ms * ∼38% -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (3796 - 4769, n=10)
4057 ms * ∼38% -5%
Huawei P Smart 2019 (Chrome 70)
3998.8 ms * ∼37% -3%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite (Chrome 71)
3879.5 ms * ∼36%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Huawei P Smart 2019 (Chrome 70)
69 Points ∼100% +11%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 161, n=147)
63 Points ∼91% +2%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite (Chrome 71)
62 Points ∼90%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (58 - 63, n=6)
60.7 Points ∼88% -2%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 (Chrome 70)
57 Points ∼83% -8%
Umidigi Z2 Pro
54 Points ∼78% -13%
Nokia 5.1 Plus
49 Points ∼71% -21%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite (Chrome 71)
171 Points ∼100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (159 - 182, n=8)
171 Points ∼100% 0%
Huawei P Smart 2019 (Chrome 70)
169 Points ∼99% -1%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 (Chrome 70)
168 Points ∼98% -2%
Umidigi Z2 Pro (Chrome 69)
167 Points ∼98% -2%
Nokia 5.1 Plus (Chrme 71)
139 Points ∼81% -19%
Average of class Smartphone (66 - 362, n=332)
119 Points ∼70% -30%

* ... kleiner is beter

Xiaomi Mi 8 LiteHuawei P Smart 2019Umidigi Z2 ProSamsung Galaxy A7 2018 HTC U12 LifeNokia 5.1 PlusAverage 128 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
40%
1%
-10%
-6%
-4%
11%
-22%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
63.95 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
66.92 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
5%
58.92 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-8%
64.39 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
1%
60.87 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-5%
59.56 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-7%
65.9 (58.8 - 73.5, n=13)
3%
48.5 (9.5 - 87.1, n=409)
-24%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
85.9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
76.17 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-11%
76.06 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-11%
78.15 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-9%
82.35 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-4%
76.56 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-11%
77.6 (72.3 - 85.9, n=13)
-10%
66.6 (8.1 - 96.5, n=409)
-22%
Random Write 4KB
18.75
70.7
277%
20.34
8%
15.45
-18%
16.2
-14%
25.65
37%
35.4 (8.48 - 127, n=15)
89%
20.6 (0.14 - 250, n=725)
10%
Random Read 4KB
81.25
45.66
-44%
86.22
6%
83.98
3%
56.71
-30%
77.72
-4%
68.5 (20.7 - 108, n=15)
-16%
45.4 (1.59 - 175, n=725)
-44%
Sequential Write 256KB
172.43
191.4
11%
188.12
9%
104.87
-39%
209.45
21%
88.92
-48%
172 (90 - 201, n=15)
0%
93 (2.99 - 503, n=725)
-46%
Sequential Read 256KB
282.62
288.27
2%
292.94
4%
295.76
5%
272.79
-3%
301.56
7%
286 (144 - 499, n=15)
1%
262 (12.1 - 1468, n=725)
-7%

Arena of Valor

0102030405060Tooltip
; min: Ø59.9 (55-60)
; high HD: Ø59.5 (49-60)

Asphalt 9: Legends

010203040Tooltip
; High Quality: Ø28.2 (25-31)
; Standard / low: Ø28.3 (24-30)
Max. Belasting
 31.6 °C31 °C33.2 °C 
 31.3 °C29.3 °C33 °C 
 30.8 °C28.5 °C32.7 °C 
Maximum: 33.2 °C
Gemiddelde: 31.3 °C
27.2 °C29.8 °C32.6 °C
28 °C29.5 °C32.7 °C
27.5 °C29.9 °C31.8 °C
Maximum: 32.7 °C
Gemiddelde: 29.9 °C
Stroomadapter (max.)  26 °C | Kamertemperatuur 20.7 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 31.3 °C / 88 F, compared to the average of 33.1 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 33.2 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 35.5 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 32.7 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 34.1 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.4 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 33.1 °C / 92 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs204035.82528.127.63124.622.94023.425.55035.739.96326.125.48025.9331002534.312521.127.21601742.420016.147.725013.556.731516.259.940014.962.750014.763.963014.262.580014.360.6100013.365.8125014.171.1160013.973.7200013.676.3250014.477.5315014.275.6400014.775500014.172.6630014.370.4800014.570.21000014.873.81250015.369.21600015.451.4SPL26.485.3N0.859.9median 14.5median 65.8Delta0.89.632.830.524.328.818.625.824.325.833.830.221.231.624.829.318.523.916.423.617.138.117.940.716.845.814.947.915.155.714.257.913.963.514.867.514.27014.770.114.468.814.3701473.313.876.914.882.714.478.81571.214.766.114.860.914.853.914.746.526.7870.859.4median 14.8median 63.50.611.1hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseXiaomi Mi 8 LiteHuawei P Smart 2019
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 13% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 78% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 41% of all tested devices were better, 9% similar, 50% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Huawei P Smart 2019 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 10% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (26.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 67% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 25% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 79% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 16% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Stroomgebruik
Uit / Standbydarklight 0.01 / 0.11 Watt
Inactiefdarkmidlight 0.56 / 1.99 / 2.05 Watt
Belasting midlight 4.62 / 8.94 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
3350 mAh
Huawei P Smart 2019
3400 mAh
Umidigi Z2 Pro
3550 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
3300 mAh
HTC U12 Life
3600 mAh
Nokia 5.1 Plus
3060 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-10%
3%
7%
-1%
21%
-6%
1%
Idle Minimum *
0.56
0.84
-50%
0.71
-27%
0.71
-27%
0.7
-25%
0.56
-0%
0.738 (0.56 - 1.2, n=10)
-32%
0.878 (0.2 - 3.4, n=752)
-57%
Idle Average *
1.99
2.21
-11%
2.01
-1%
1.36
32%
1.5
25%
1.72
14%
1.903 (1.4 - 2.2, n=10)
4%
1.732 (0.6 - 6.2, n=751)
13%
Idle Maximum *
2.05
2.23
-9%
2.03
1%
1.47
28%
2.5
-22%
1.76
14%
2.21 (1.54 - 4.1, n=10)
-8%
2.02 (0.74 - 6.6, n=752)
1%
Load Average *
4.62
4.2
9%
3.61
22%
5.13
-11%
4.7
-2%
3.11
33%
4.61 (3.47 - 8.2, n=10)
-0%
4.06 (0.8 - 10.8, n=746)
12%
Load Maximum *
8.94
7.86
12%
7.34
18%
7.89
12%
7.4
17%
5.2
42%
8.22 (5.93 - 12.2, n=10)
8%
5.88 (1.2 - 14.2, n=746)
34%

* ... kleiner is beter

Batterijduur
Inactief (zonder WLAN, minimale helderheid)
27h 58min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
9h 07min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
11h 02min
Belast (maximale helderheid)
2h 30min
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
3350 mAh
Huawei P Smart 2019
3400 mAh
Umidigi Z2 Pro
3550 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
3300 mAh
HTC U12 Life
3600 mAh
Nokia 5.1 Plus
3060 mAh
Batterijduur
3%
31%
27%
10%
30%
Reader / Idle
1678
1293
-23%
1269
-24%
1467
-13%
1953
16%
H.264
662
464
-30%
836
26%
WiFi v1.3
547
506
-7%
669
22%
605
11%
603
10%
779
42%
Load
150
257
71%
294
96%
273
82%
198
32%

Pro

+ goede systeemprestaties
+ zeer goede camera's
+ Bluetooth 5.0
+ veel opslagruimte

Contra

- matige batterijlevensduur
- geen 3.5 mm audiopoort
- instellingen zijn beperkt via een always-online vereiste en Mi account
- geen NFC
- ondersteunt slechts L3 DRM
Getest: Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite. Testmodel geleverd door: notebooksbilliger.de
Getest: Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite. Testmodel geleverd door: notebooksbilliger.de

Voor het volledige, Engelse testrapport, klik hier.

Xiaomi onthulde de Mi 8 Lite met de ambitie zichzelf te profileren als een belangrijke speler op de Europese markt en zich te onderscheiden van de geïmporteerde Chinese smartphones. De wereldwijde versie van Xiaomi's eigen MIUI 10.0 leent zich niet voor kritiek, behalve dat je een Mi-account moet maken. Bovendien zijn de occasionele pop-ups die ons vragen om apps te beoordelen niet iets waar we enthousiast over zijn.

De systeemprestaties van de Mi 8 Lite zijn uitstekend en op hetzelfde niveau als de rest van de concurrentie. Bovendien verhoogt de Chinese fabrikant de lat van wat verwacht wordt van een middenklasse smarthphone door de Mi 8 Lite uit te rusten met 6 GB RAM en 128 GB interne opslag. De camera's leveren ook een zeer goede beeldkwaliteit. Helaas is er geen NFC-chip. Daarom kan de smartphone geen diensten zoals Google Play gebruiken. Degenen die geen 3.5-mm koptelefoonaansluiting nodig hebben en tevreden zijn met USB 2.0-snelheden, zullen niet in staat zijn om een ​​betere smartphone te krijgen voor €270.

De Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite zet de concurrentie op de Europese markt onder druk en biedt een zeer goede prijs-prestatieverhouding.

Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite - 26-01-2019 v6
Mike Wobker

Behuizing
84%
Toetsenbord
65 / 75 → 87%
Aanwijsapparaat
87%
Aansluitmogelijkheden
44 / 60 → 73%
Gewicht
91%
Batterij
92%
Beeldscherm
87%
Gaming-performance
54 / 63 → 86%
Applicatie-performance
60 / 70 → 86%
Temperatuur
93%
Luidheid
100%
Audio
62 / 91 → 68%
Camera
67%
Gemiddelde
76%
85%
Smartphone - Gewogen Gemiddelde

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Overzichten en testrapporten over laptops en mobieltjes > Testrapporten > Kort testrapport Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite Smartphone
Mike Wobker, 2019-01-27 (Update: 2019-01-27)