Kort testrapport Sharp Aquos C10 Smartphone

Name: Kort testrapport Sharp Aquos C10 Smartphone
Item: Sharp Aquos C10
Rating: 76
Author: Florian Wimmer

Florian Wimmer, 👁 Florian Schmitt, ✓ Felicitas Krohn, 29-08-2018

Android ARM Touchscreen Smartphone

Sharp Comeback. Met de Sharp Aquos C10 middenklasse smartphone heeft de fabrikant behoorlijk wat succes in Japan en probeert nu ook in het Westen een voet tussen de deur te krijgen. Door de goede prestaties en overvloedige scherm, kan deze smartphone aantrekkelijk zijn. In ons testrapport lees je of deze comeback succesvol is.

Testtoestel voorzien door notebooksbilliger.de

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Sharp Aquos C10 (Aquos Serie)

Processor

Qualcomm Snapdragon 630

Grafische kaart

Qualcomm Adreno 508

Geheugen

4096 MB

Beeldscherm

5.5 inch 17:9, 2040 x 1080 pixel 420 PPI, capacitief touchscherm, IPS, glimmend: ja

Opslag

64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 GB

, 50 GB beschikbaar

Verbindingen

1 USB 2.0, Audio Verbindingen: Audio output via USB-C, Card Reader: microSD max. 128 GB, 1 Vingerafdruklezer, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensoren: versnellingssensor, gyroscoop, nabijheidssensor, kompas, USB-C

Netwerkmogelijkheden

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.0, GSM (850/900/1800/1900), UMTS (850/900/1900/2100), LTE (B1/B3/B7/B8/B20), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS

Afmetingen

hoogte x breedte x diepte (in mm): 7.9 x 141.8 x 72

Batterij

10.26 Wh, 2700 mAh Lithium-Polymer

Besturingssysteem

Android 8.0 Oreo

Camera

Primary Camera: 12 MPix Dual camera systeem: 12 MP, f/1.75, phase comparison AF (dual-pixel), dual LED flits, videos @1080p/30fps (hoofdcamera), 8 MP, f/2.0, depth sharpness (secundaire camera)
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix f/2.0

Bijkomende functionaliteiten

Luidsprekers: mono luidspreker aan de onderzijde, Toetsenbord: virtueel toetsenbord, snellader, USB-kabel, beschermende hoes, SIM-tool, USB-C naar 3.5 mm adapter, 24 Maanden Garantie, LTE Cat.4 (download: 150 Mbit/s / upload: 50 Mbit/s); SAR 0,353 W/kg (hoofd), 1,73 (lichaam), fanless

Gewicht

140 g, Voeding: 61 g

Prijs

399 Euro

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

zie alle specificaties

Size Comparison

Top 10 Testrapporten

» Top 10 Multimedia Notebooks
» Top 10 Gaming-Notebooks
» Top 10 Budget Office/Business-Notebooks
» Top 10 Premium Office/Business-Notebooks
» Top 10 Workstation-Laptops
» Top 10 Lichtgewicht Gaming-Notebooks
» Top 10 Subnotebooks
» Top 10 Smartphones tot €120
» Top 10 Smartphones tot €300
» Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Top 10 Convertibles
» Top 10 Tablets
» Top 10 Windows-Tablets
» Top 10 Phablets (>5.5-inch)
» Top 10 Smartphones
» Top 10 Smartphones (≤5-inch)
» Best Geteste Notebook Beeldschermen
» Top 10 Notebooks tot € 1.000 De beste notebookbeeldschermen zoals getest door Notebookcheck
» Top 10 Notebooks tot €500
» Top 10 Notebooks tot €300

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Sharp Aquos C10 Adreno 508, 630, 64 GB eMMC Flash	308 MBit/s ∼100%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro Adreno 512, 660, 64 GB eMMC Flash	281 MBit/s ∼91% -9%
Average of class Smartphone (5.9 - 939, n=427)	226 MBit/s ∼73% -27%
JVC J20 Adreno 508, 630, 64 GB eMMC Flash	221 MBit/s ∼72% -28%
Honor View 10 Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	200 MBit/s ∼65% -35%
LG Q7 Plus Mali-T860 MP2, MT6750S, 64 GB eMMC Flash	42.7 MBit/s ∼14% -86%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro Adreno 512, 660, 64 GB eMMC Flash	346 MBit/s ∼100% +11%
Sharp Aquos C10 Adreno 508, 630, 64 GB eMMC Flash	313 MBit/s ∼90%
JVC J20 Adreno 508, 630, 64 GB eMMC Flash	226 MBit/s ∼65% -28%
Honor View 10 Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	223 MBit/s ∼64% -29%
Average of class Smartphone (9.4 - 703, n=427)	216 MBit/s ∼62% -31%
LG Q7 Plus Mali-T860 MP2, MT6750S, 64 GB eMMC Flash	54.5 MBit/s ∼16% -83%

Beeldvergelijking

Bekijk een scène en navigeer binnen het eerste beeld. Eén klik wijzigt het zoomniveau. Eén klik op het ingezoomde beeld opent het origineel in een nieuw venster. Het eerste beeld toont de verschaalde foto van het testtoestel.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

klik om beelden te laden

klik om beelden te laden

klik om beelden te laden


548 cd/m²	551 cd/m²	509 cd/m²
544 cd/m²	548 cd/m²	518 cd/m²
533 cd/m²	533 cd/m²	532 cd/m²

Helderheidsverdeling

X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 551 cd/m² Gemiddelde: 535.1 cd/m² Minimum: 2.44 cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling: 92 %
Helderheid in Batterij-modus: 548 cd/m²
Contrast: 1118:1 (Zwart: 0.49 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.21 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6
ΔE Greyscale 6.1 | 0.64-98 Ø6.2
95.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.228

	Sharp Aquos C10 IPS, 2040x1080, 5.5	BQ Aquaris X2 Pro LTPS, 2160x1080, 5.65	JVC J20 IPS, 2160x1080, 5.65	LG Q7 Plus IPS, 2160x1080, 5.5	Honor View 10 IPS, 2160x1080, 5.99
Screen		11%	-32%	-12%	29%
Brightness middle	548	675 23%	411 -25%	431 -21%	530 -3%
Brightness	535	650 21%	426 -20%	419 -22%	523 -2%
Brightness Distribution	92	92 0%	82 -11%	89 -3%	88 -4%
Black Level *	0.49	0.46 6%	0.53 -8%	0.58 -18%	0.35 29%
Contrast	1118	1467 31%	775 -31%	743 -34%	1514 35%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *	5.21	5.9 -13%	8.84 -70%	6.2 -19%	2.4 54%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *	13.47	9.5 29%	15.08 -12%	10.1 25%	5.5 59%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *	6.1	6.6 -8%	10.7 -75%	6.2 -2%	2.2 64%
Gamma	2.228 ^99%	2.36 ^93%	2.433 ^90%	2.26 ^97%	2.25 ^98%
CCT	7538 ^86%	7846 ^83%	10717 ^61%	8064 ^81%	6598 ^99%

* ... kleiner is beter

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

Om de schermhelderheid te verlagen schakelen sommige laptops het backlight erg snel aan en uit. Dit gebeurt aan een dergelijk hoge frequentie dat het niet zichtbaar is voor het menselijk oog. Als de frequentie te laag is kunnen personen met gevoelige ogen geïrriteerd geraken, hoofdpijn krijgen en zelfs flickering waarnemen.

Screen flickering / PWM waargenomen

250 Hz

≤ 10 % helderheid instelling

Het backlight van het scherm flikkert aan 250 Hz (hoogstwaarschijnlijk met PWM - Pulse-Width Modulation) aan een helderheid van 10 % en lager. Boven deze helderheid zou er geen flickering / PWM mogen optreden.

De frequentie van 250 Hz is redelijk laag en de meeste mensen die gevoelig zijn aan flickering kunnen dit dus waarnemen of geïrriteerde ogen krijgen (gebruikmakend van de vermelde helderheid en lager).

Ter vergelijking: 51 % van alle geteste toestellen maakten geen gebruik van PWM om de schermhelderheid te verlagen. Als het wel werd gebruikt, werd een gemiddelde van 9378 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz waargenomen.

Responstijd Scherm

ℹ

De responstijden van het scherm tonen hoe snel het scherm in staat is om van één kleur naar de andere te veranderen. Trage responstijden kunnen aanleiding geven tot 'nabeelden' rond bewegende objecten of het scherm wazig maken (blur). Vooral spelers van snelle 3D-games hebben baat bij een scherm met snelle responstijden.

↔ Responstijd Zwart naar Wit
20 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd	↗ 7 ms stijging
20 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd	↘ 13 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde prima responstijden in onze tests maar is misschien wat te traag voor competitieve games. Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.8 (minimum) tot 240 (maximum) ms. » 22 % van alle toestellen zijn beter. Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd beter is dan het gemiddelde (25 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.
↔ Responstijd 50% Grijs naar 80% Grijs
40 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd	↗ 19 ms stijging
40 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd	↘ 21 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde trage responstijden in onze tests en is misschien te traag voor games. Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.9 (minimum) tot 636 (maximum) ms. » 45 % van alle toestellen zijn beter. Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd vergelijkbaar is met het gemiddelde (39.7 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.

AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sorteer op waarde)
Sharp Aquos C10	71531 Points ∼41%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro	115834 Points ∼67% +62%
JVC J20	67408 Points ∼39% -6%
LG Q7 Plus	44064 Points ∼25% -38%
Honor View 10	173653 Points ∼100% +143%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (44128 - 73617, n=12)	68642 Points ∼40% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (5600 - 293444, n=489)	87523 Points ∼50% +22%

AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sorteer op waarde)
Sharp Aquos C10	89351 Points ∼63%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro	140875 Points ∼100% +58%
JVC J20	89279 Points ∼63% 0%
LG Q7 Plus	52855 Points ∼38% -41%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (87300 - 90674, n=11)	89396 Points ∼63% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (17073 - 459850, n=285)	139075 Points ∼99% +56%

PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sorteer op waarde)
Sharp Aquos C10	4636 Points ∼69%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro	5965 Points ∼89% +29%
JVC J20	4836 Points ∼72% +4%
LG Q7 Plus	3080 Points ∼46% -34%
Honor View 10	6724 Points ∼100% +45%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (4636 - 5987, n=12)	4968 Points ∼74% +7%
Average of class Smartphone (2630 - 11440, n=367)	5225 Points ∼78% +13%
Work performance score (sorteer op waarde)
Sharp Aquos C10	5377 Points ∼65%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro	6332 Points ∼76% +18%
JVC J20	5762 Points ∼69% +7%
LG Q7 Plus	3969 Points ∼48% -26%
Honor View 10	8306 Points ∼100% +54%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (4948 - 6264, n=13)	5632 Points ∼68% +5%
Average of class Smartphone (1077 - 14439, n=538)	5652 Points ∼68% +5%

BaseMark OS II
Web (sorteer op waarde)
Sharp Aquos C10	666 Points ∼56%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro	1146 Points ∼97% +72%
JVC J20	862 Points ∼73% +29%
LG Q7 Plus	751 Points ∼63% +13%
Honor View 10	1184 Points ∼100% +78%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (666 - 936, n=13)	859 Points ∼73% +29%
Average of class Smartphone (7 - 1731, n=621)	751 Points ∼63% +13%
Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Sharp Aquos C10	1502 Points ∼39%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro	2279 Points ∼59% +52%
JVC J20	1470 Points ∼38% -2%
LG Q7 Plus	631 Points ∼16% -58%
Honor View 10	3892 Points ∼100% +159%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (1409 - 1523, n=13)	1494 Points ∼38% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (18 - 15969, n=621)	1986 Points ∼51% +32%
Memory (sorteer op waarde)
Sharp Aquos C10	998 Points ∼23%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro	2494 Points ∼58% +150%
JVC J20	1159 Points ∼27% +16%
LG Q7 Plus	800 Points ∼19% -20%
Honor View 10	4276 Points ∼100% +328%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (838 - 1405, n=13)	1199 Points ∼28% +20%
Average of class Smartphone (21 - 7500, n=621)	1487 Points ∼35% +49%
System (sorteer op waarde)
Sharp Aquos C10	1763 Points ∼34%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro	5048 Points ∼97% +186%
JVC J20	3288 Points ∼63% +87%
LG Q7 Plus	1407 Points ∼27% -20%
Honor View 10	5195 Points ∼100% +195%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (1763 - 3319, n=13)	3147 Points ∼61% +79%
Average of class Smartphone (369 - 12202, n=621)	2910 Points ∼56% +65%
Overall (sorteer op waarde)
Sharp Aquos C10	1152 Points ∼36%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro	2394 Points ∼75% +108%
JVC J20	1483 Points ∼47% +29%
LG Q7 Plus	855 Points ∼27% -26%
Honor View 10	3181 Points ∼100% +176%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (1152 - 1570, n=13)	1479 Points ∼46% +28%
Average of class Smartphone (1 - 6097, n=621)	1460 Points ∼46% +27%

Geekbench 4.4
Compute RenderScript Score (sorteer op waarde)
Sharp Aquos C10	2910 Points ∼32%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro	5688 Points ∼63% +95%
JVC J20	3681 Points ∼41% +26%
LG Q7 Plus	2084 Points ∼23% -28%
Honor View 10	9015 Points ∼100% +210%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (2910 - 3956, n=12)	3718 Points ∼41% +28%
Average of class Smartphone (663 - 21070, n=317)	4676 Points ∼52% +61%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sorteer op waarde)
Sharp Aquos C10	2246 Points ∼33%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro	5856 Points ∼86% +161%
JVC J20	4220 Points ∼62% +88%
LG Q7 Plus	2135 Points ∼31% -5%
Honor View 10	6785 Points ∼100% +202%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (2246 - 4234, n=13)	4009 Points ∼59% +78%
Average of class Smartphone (883 - 11598, n=376)	4682 Points ∼69% +108%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sorteer op waarde)
Sharp Aquos C10	710 Points ∼37%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro	1579 Points ∼82% +122%
JVC J20	879 Points ∼46% +24%
LG Q7 Plus	639 Points ∼33% -10%
Honor View 10	1918 Points ∼100% +170%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (710 - 885, n=13)	853 Points ∼44% +20%
Average of class Smartphone (390 - 4824, n=376)	1413 Points ∼74% +99%

3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Sharp Aquos C10	1719 Points ∼59%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro	2628 Points ∼90% +53%
JVC J20	1765 Points ∼60% +3%
LG Q7 Plus	1031 Points ∼35% -40%
Honor View 10	2931 Points ∼100% +71%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (1631 - 1822, n=13)	1734 Points ∼59% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (486 - 4320, n=454)	1849 Points ∼63% +8%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Sharp Aquos C10	712 Points ∼24%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro	1196 Points ∼40% +68%
JVC J20	721 Points ∼24% +1%
LG Q7 Plus	80 Points ∼3% -89%
Honor View 10	2994 Points ∼100% +321%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (704 - 729, n=13)	718 Points ∼24% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (53 - 6362, n=454)	1423 Points ∼48% +100%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sorteer op waarde)
Sharp Aquos C10	819 Points ∼27%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro	1361 Points ∼46% +66%
JVC J20	830 Points ∼28% +1%
LG Q7 Plus	101 Points ∼3% -88%
Honor View 10	2980 Points ∼100% +264%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (809 - 839, n=13)	825 Points ∼28% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (68 - 5734, n=455)	1372 Points ∼46% +68%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Sharp Aquos C10	1725 Points ∼65%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro	2638 Points ∼100% +53%
JVC J20	1770 Points ∼67% +3%
LG Q7 Plus	1029 Points ∼39% -40%
Honor View 10	1906 Points ∼72% +10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (1687 - 1816, n=13)	1746 Points ∼66% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (293 - 4454, n=494)	1714 Points ∼65% -1%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Sharp Aquos C10	1286 Points ∼66%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro	1938 Points ∼99% +51%
JVC J20	1257 Points ∼64% -2%
LG Q7 Plus	96 Points ∼5% -93%
Honor View 10	1954 Points ∼100% +52%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (1234 - 1289, n=13)	1258 Points ∼64% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (43 - 10008, n=493)	1844 Points ∼94% +43%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sorteer op waarde)
Sharp Aquos C10	1363 Points ∼66%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro	2059 Points ∼100% +51%
JVC J20	1344 Points ∼65% -1%
LG Q7 Plus	120 Points ∼6% -91%
Honor View 10	1943 Points ∼94% +43%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (1315 - 1374, n=13)	1341 Points ∼65% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (55 - 7820, n=496)	1603 Points ∼78% +18%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Sharp Aquos C10	12667 Points ∼66%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro	19050 Points ∼100% +50%
JVC J20	13153 Points ∼69% +4%
LG Q7 Plus	9903 Points ∼52% -22%
Honor View 10	14556 Points ∼76% +15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (12437 - 13217, n=13)	12963 Points ∼68% +2%
Average of class Smartphone (735 - 45072, n=655)	13978 Points ∼73% +10%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sorteer op waarde)
Sharp Aquos C10	16508 Points ∼56%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro	29306 Points ∼100% +78%
JVC J20	18471 Points ∼63% +12%
LG Q7 Plus	9656 Points ∼33% -42%
Honor View 10	22429 Points ∼77% +36%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (16508 - 18635, n=13)	18279 Points ∼62% +11%
Average of class Smartphone (536 - 209204, n=653)	21146 Points ∼72% +28%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sorteer op waarde)
Sharp Aquos C10	15466 Points ∼59%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro	26175 Points ∼100% +69%
JVC J20	16948 Points ∼65% +10%
LG Q7 Plus	9710 Points ∼37% -37%
Honor View 10	20022 Points ∼76% +29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (15466 - 17032, n=13)	16750 Points ∼64% +8%
Average of class Smartphone (662 - 97276, n=653)	17322 Points ∼66% +12%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sorteer op waarde)
Sharp Aquos C10	30 fps ∼24%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro	46 fps ∼37% +53%
JVC J20	29 fps ∼23% -3%
LG Q7 Plus	17 fps ∼14% -43%
Honor View 10	125 fps ∼100% +317%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (29 - 30, n=13)	29.7 fps ∼24% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (0.5 - 322, n=677)	36.9 fps ∼30% +23%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sorteer op waarde)
Sharp Aquos C10	30 fps ∼51%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro	51 fps ∼86% +70%
JVC J20	28 fps ∼47% -7%
LG Q7 Plus	16 fps ∼27% -47%
Honor View 10	59 fps ∼100% +97%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (25 - 31, n=13)	29.2 fps ∼49% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (1 - 120, n=686)	27.7 fps ∼47% -8%

GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sorteer op waarde)
Sharp Aquos C10	14 fps ∼21%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro	23 fps ∼35% +64%
JVC J20	14 fps ∼21% 0%
LG Q7 Plus	7.1 fps ∼11% -49%
Honor View 10	66 fps ∼100% +371%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (13 - 14, n=13)	13.8 fps ∼21% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (0.8 - 175, n=583)	21.1 fps ∼32% +51%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sorteer op waarde)
Sharp Aquos C10	14 fps ∼25%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro	22 fps ∼40% +57%
JVC J20	13 fps ∼24% -7%
LG Q7 Plus	6.8 fps ∼12% -51%
Honor View 10	55 fps ∼100% +293%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (11 - 15, n=13)	13.8 fps ∼25% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (1.2 - 115, n=592)	19 fps ∼35% +36%

GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Sharp Aquos C10	10 fps ∼48%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro	15 fps ∼71% +50%
JVC J20	9.7 fps ∼46% -3%
LG Q7 Plus	4.7 fps ∼22% -53%
Honor View 10	21 fps ∼100% +110%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (5.2 - 10, n=13)	9.38 fps ∼45% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (0.87 - 117, n=449)	17.3 fps ∼82% +73%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Sharp Aquos C10	9.8 fps ∼27%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro	14 fps ∼39% +43%
JVC J20	9.2 fps ∼26% -6%
LG Q7 Plus	4.5 fps ∼13% -54%
Honor View 10	36 fps ∼100% +267%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (5.3 - 11, n=13)	9.36 fps ∼26% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (1.2 - 110, n=451)	16.4 fps ∼46% +67%

GFXBench
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Sharp Aquos C10	5.6 fps ∼27%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro	9.1 fps ∼43% +63%
JVC J20	5.5 fps ∼26% -2%
LG Q7 Plus	2.5 fps ∼12% -55%
Honor View 10	21 fps ∼100% +275%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (5.3 - 5.6, n=13)	5.48 fps ∼26% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (0.6 - 73, n=374)	11.8 fps ∼56% +111%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Sharp Aquos C10	6 fps ∼29%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro	8.6 fps ∼41% +43%
JVC J20	5.2 fps ∼25% -13%
LG Q7 Plus	2.4 fps ∼11% -60%
Honor View 10	21 fps ∼100% +250%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (4.3 - 6, n=13)	5.48 fps ∼26% -9%
Average of class Smartphone (1.1 - 60, n=378)	10.6 fps ∼50% +77%

Legende

Sharp Aquos C10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Qualcomm Adreno 508, 64 GB eMMC Flash

BQ Aquaris X2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Qualcomm Adreno 512, 64 GB eMMC Flash

JVC J20 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Qualcomm Adreno 508, 64 GB eMMC Flash

LG Q7 Plus Mediatek MT6750S, ARM Mali-T860 MP2, 64 GB eMMC Flash

Honor View 10 HiSilicon Kirin 970, ARM Mali-G72 MP12, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630

Average of class Smartphone

JetStream 1.1 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1 | WebXPRT 2015

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro (Chrome 67)	49.396 Points ∼100% +75%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 300, n=520)	40.5 Points ∼82% +43%
Honor View 10 (Chrome 63)	34.871 Points ∼71% +23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (27.4 - 30.8, n=12)	28.3 Points ∼57% 0%
Sharp Aquos C10 (Chrome 68)	28.27 Points ∼57%
JVC J20 (Chrome 68)	28.25 Points ∼57% 0%
LG Q7 Plus (Chrome 67)	18.694 Points ∼38% -34%

Octane V2 - Total Score
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro (Chrome 67)	9582 Points ∼100% +84%
Honor View 10 (Chrome 63)	6729 Points ∼70% +29%
Average of class Smartphone (894 - 49151, n=679)	6576 Points ∼69% +26%
Sharp Aquos C10 (Chrome 68)	5202 Points ∼54%
JVC J20 (Chrome 68)	5117 Points ∼53% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (4398 - 5202, n=13)	4963 Points ∼52% -5%
LG Q7 Plus (Chrome 67)	3422 Points ∼36% -34%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
LG Q7 Plus (Chrome 67)	13670.9 ms * ∼100% -43%
Average of class Smartphone (572 - 59466, n=704)	10649 ms * ∼78% -12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (8396 - 10257, n=13)	9702 ms * ∼71% -2%
JVC J20 (Chrome 68)	9660 ms * ∼71% -1%
Sharp Aquos C10 (Chrome 68)	9532.6 ms * ∼70%
Honor View 10 (Chrome 63)	6013 ms * ∼44% +37%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro (Chrome 67)	4093.5 ms * ∼30% +57%

WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro (Chrome 67)	159 Points ∼100% +37%
Honor View 10 (Chrome 63)	157 Points ∼99% +35%
Average of class Smartphone (27 - 362, n=328)	122 Points ∼77% +5%
Sharp Aquos C10 (Chrome 68)	116 Points ∼73%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (86 - 117, n=10)	106 Points ∼67% -9%
LG Q7 Plus (Chrome 67)	70 Points ∼44% -40%

* ... kleiner is beter

	Sharp Aquos C10	BQ Aquaris X2 Pro	JVC J20	LG Q7 Plus	Honor View 10	Average 64 GB eMMC Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		-1%	-8%	-14%	205%	3%	-13%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard	60.7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	61.13 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 1%	63 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 4%	62.2 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 2%	65.06 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 7%	57.6 (11.2 - 74.7, n=98) -5%	49 (3.4 - 87.1, n=411) -19%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard	83 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	83.35 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 0%	82.8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 0%	81.45 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -2%	81 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -2%	76.3 (21.1 - 87.2, n=98) -8%	67.2 (8.1 - 96.5, n=411) -19%
Random Write 4KB	16.9	15.43 -9%	6.3 -63%	11.91 -30%	160 847%	24 (3.4 - 88.2, n=112) 42%	21.3 (0.14 - 250, n=730) 26%
Random Read 4KB	48.2	51.25 6%	58.3 21%	35.8 -26%	144.3 199%	54.3 (11.4 - 149, n=112) 13%	46.1 (1.59 - 196, n=730) -4%
Sequential Write 256KB	213.4	204.83 -4%	199.7 -6%	186.55 -13%	194.3 -9%	171 (40 - 246, n=112) -20%	94.6 (2.99 - 590, n=730) -56%
Sequential Read 256KB	283.8	280.78 -1%	270.6 -5%	235.9 -17%	810.3 186%	273 (95.6 - 704, n=112) -4%	266 (12.1 - 1504, n=730) -6%

Arena of Valor
	Instellingen	Waarde
	min	31 fps
	high HD	30 fps

Shadow Fight 3
	Instellingen	Waarde
	high	56 fps
	minimal	55 fps

Max. Belasting

Inactief


40.1 °C	38.9 °C	38.7 °C
40.4 °C	39.1 °C	39.9 °C
39.2 °C	39.1 °C	38.2 °C

Maximum: 40.4 °C
Gemiddelde: 39.3 °C


37.4 °C	38.5 °C	40.9 °C
37.2 °C	38.2 °C	42.8 °C
37.4 °C	38.1 °C	42.2 °C

Maximum: 42.8 °C
Gemiddelde: 39.2 °C

Stroomadapter (max.) 42.1 °C | Kamertemperatuur 22.2 °C | Voltcraft IR-260

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 39.3 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 33.1 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.4 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 35.5 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.8 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 34.1 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.4 °C / 89 F, compared to the device average of 33.1 °C / 92 F.

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Sharp Aquos C10 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 36% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 60% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 32% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

JVC J20 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 58% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 31% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 74% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 20% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Stroomgebruik

Uit / Standby	0.05 / 0.2 Watt
Inactief	0.9 / 2.2 / 3.8 Watt
Belasting	6.2 / 8 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Sharp Aquos C10 2700 mAh	BQ Aquaris X2 Pro 3100 mAh	JVC J20 3400 mAh	LG Q7 Plus 3000 mAh	Honor View 10 3750 mAh
Power Consumption		21%	21%	27%	4%
Idle Minimum *	0.9	0.63 30%	1 -11%	1 -11%	1.05 -17%
Idle Average *	2.2	2.16 2%	1.6 27%	1.57 29%	2.36 -7%
Idle Maximum *	3.8	2.18 43%	2.8 26%	1.64 57%	2.41 37%
Load Average *	6.2	4.48 28%	4 35%	4.1 34%	4.93 20%
Load Maximum *	8	7.87 2%	5.9 26%	6.02 25%	9.04 -13%

* ... kleiner is beter

Batterijduur

Inactief (zonder WLAN, minimale helderheid)		23h 45min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3		11h 12min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		12h 15min
Belast (maximale helderheid)		4h 27min

	Sharp Aquos C10 2700 mAh	BQ Aquaris X2 Pro 3100 mAh	JVC J20 3400 mAh	LG Q7 Plus 3000 mAh	Honor View 10 3750 mAh
Batterijduur		-18%	8%	-23%	11%
Reader / Idle	1425	1374 -4%		980 -31%	1671 17%
H.264	735	658 -10%		455 -38%	819 11%
WiFi v1.3	672	605 -10%	726 8%	620 -8%	679 1%
Load	267	145 -46%		230 -14%	305 14%

Pro

+ helder beeldscherm

+ scherpe camera beelden

+ goede batterijduur

+ geen bloatware

+ snelle werking

+ snel WLAN

Contra

- matige kwaliteit stemgeluid

- geen 3.5-mm audio poort

- weinig LTE-banden

- throttling bij langduriger belasting

In review: Sharp Aquos C10. Test unit provided by notebooksbilliger.de

Dit is de verkorte versie van het originele artikel. Het volledige, Engelse testrapport vind je hier.

Sharp's terugkeer op de westerse smartphone markt is een lastige taak, en met de Sharp Aquos C10 slaagt de fabrikant er met de eerste poging in om een solide middenklasse smartphone op de markt te zetten. De smartphone kan overtuigen met zijn heldere beeldscherm, goede camera's, fatsoenlijke batterijduur en snelle WLAN. De prestaties zijn allemaal voldoende en de Sharp smartphone voelt over het algemeen snel aan. Er zijn echter enkele smartphones in deze prijsklasse die aanzienlijk krachtiger zijn. Daarnaast is er merkbaar sprake van throttling in de Sharp Aquos C10 bij langduriger belasting.

Met de Aquos C10 maakt Sharp een goede rentre op de westerse markt. Met name de camera's, WLAN-snelheid en de batterijduur zijn overtuigend.

Aan de andere kant kunnen potentiële klanten zich ergeren aan het ontbreken van een 3.5-mm poort, matige stemkwaliteit en natuurlijk kan de inkeping in het beeldscherm een dealbreker zijn voor sommigen. Diegenen die de ongebruikelijke vormgeving kunnen waarderen en niet de krachtigste hardware nodig hebben, zullen een goede smartphone in handen krijgen die niet een dertien in een dozijn is.

Sharp Aquos C10 - 2019-09-2727-09-2019 v7
Florian Wimmer

Behuizing

73%

Toetsenbord

67 / 75 → 89%

Aanwijsapparaat

90%

Aansluitmogelijkheden

47 / 70 → 67%

Gewicht

93%

Batterij

89%

Beeldscherm

83%

Gaming-performance

4 / 64 → 7%

Applicatie-performance

38 / 86 → 44%

Temperatuur

88%

Luidheid

100%

Audio

71 / 90 → 79%

Camera

54%

Gemiddelde

69%

76%

Smartphone - Gewogen Gemiddelde

Kort testrapport Sharp Aquos C10 Smartphone

Size Comparison

Top 10 Testrapporten

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Responstijd Scherm

Sharp Aquos C10 audio analysis

JVC J20 audio analysis

Pro

Contra

Pricecompare