Notebookcheck

Kort testrapport Sharp Aquos C10 Smartphone

Florian Wimmer, 29-08-2018

Sharp Comeback. Met de Sharp Aquos C10 middenklasse smartphone heeft de fabrikant behoorlijk wat succes in Japan en probeert nu ook in het Westen een voet tussen de deur te krijgen. Door de goede prestaties en overvloedige scherm, kan deze smartphone aantrekkelijk zijn. In ons testrapport lees je of deze comeback succesvol is.

Sharp Aquos C10 (Aquos Serie)
Grafische kaart
Qualcomm Adreno 508
Geheugen
4096 MB 
Beeldscherm
5.5 inch 17:9, 2040 x 1080 pixel 420 PPI, capacitief touchscherm, IPS, glimmend: ja
Opslag
64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 GB 
, 50 GB beschikbaar
Verbindingen
1 USB 2.0, Audio Verbindingen: Audio output via USB-C, Card Reader: microSD max. 128 GB, 1 Vingerafdruklezer, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensoren: versnellingssensor, gyroscoop, nabijheidssensor, kompas, USB-C
Netwerkmogelijkheden
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 5.0, GSM (850/​900/​1800/​1900), UMTS (850/​900/​1900/​2100), LTE (B1/​B3/​B7/​B8/​B20), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Afmetingen
hoogte x breedte x diepte (in mm): 7.9 x 141.8 x 72
Batterij
10.26 Wh, 2700 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Besturingssysteem
Android 8.0 Oreo
Camera
Primary Camera: 12 MPix Dual camera systeem: 12 MP, f/​1.75, phase comparison AF (dual-pixel), dual LED flits, videos @1080p/​30fps (hoofdcamera), 8 MP, f/​2.0, depth sharpness (secundaire camera)
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix f/2.0
Bijkomende functionaliteiten
Luidsprekers: mono luidspreker aan de onderzijde, Toetsenbord: virtueel toetsenbord, snellader, USB-kabel, beschermende hoes, SIM-tool, USB-C naar 3.5 mm adapter, 24 Maanden Garantie, LTE Cat.4 (download: 150 Mbit/s / upload: 50 Mbit/s); SAR 0,353 W/kg (hoofd), 1,73 (lichaam), fanless
Gewicht
140 g, Voeding: 61 g
Prijs
399 Euro

 

Sharp Aquos C10
Sharp Aquos C10
Sharp Aquos C10
Sharp Aquos C10
Sharp Aquos C10
Sharp Aquos C10

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Sharp Aquos C10
Adreno 508, 630, 64 GB eMMC Flash
308 MBit/s ∼100%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
Adreno 512, 660, 64 GB eMMC Flash
281 MBit/s ∼91% -9%
JVC J20
Adreno 508, 630, 64 GB eMMC Flash
221 MBit/s ∼72% -28%
Honor View 10
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
200 MBit/s ∼65% -35%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 939, n=259)
186 MBit/s ∼60% -40%
LG Q7 Plus
Mali-T860 MP2, MT6750S, 64 GB eMMC Flash
42.7 MBit/s ∼14% -86%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
Adreno 512, 660, 64 GB eMMC Flash
346 MBit/s ∼100% +11%
Sharp Aquos C10
Adreno 508, 630, 64 GB eMMC Flash
313 MBit/s ∼90%
JVC J20
Adreno 508, 630, 64 GB eMMC Flash
226 MBit/s ∼65% -28%
Honor View 10
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
223 MBit/s ∼64% -29%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 703, n=259)
182 MBit/s ∼53% -42%
LG Q7 Plus
Mali-T860 MP2, MT6750S, 64 GB eMMC Flash
54.5 MBit/s ∼16% -83%
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – overview
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – overview
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – forest
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – forest
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – bridge
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – bridge
GPS Sharp Aquos C10 – overview
GPS Sharp Aquos C10 – overview
GPS Sharp Aquos C10 – forest
GPS Sharp Aquos C10 – forest
GPS Sharp Aquos C10 – bridge
GPS Sharp Aquos C10 – bridge

Beeldvergelijking

Bekijk een scène en navigeer binnen het eerste beeld. Eén klik wijzigt het zoomniveau. Eén klik op het ingezoomde beeld opent het origineel in een nieuw venster. Het eerste beeld toont de verschaalde foto van het testtoestel.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
klik om beelden te laden
548
cd/m²
551
cd/m²
509
cd/m²
544
cd/m²
548
cd/m²
518
cd/m²
533
cd/m²
533
cd/m²
532
cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 551 cd/m² Gemiddelde: 535.1 cd/m² Minimum: 2.44 cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling: 92 %
Helderheid in Batterij-modus: 548 cd/m²
Contrast: 1118:1 (Zwart: 0.49 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.21 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.3
ΔE Greyscale 6.1 | 0.64-98 Ø6.5
95.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.228
Sharp Aquos C10
IPS, 2040x1080, 5.5
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
LTPS, 2160x1080, 5.65
JVC J20
IPS, 2160x1080, 5.65
LG Q7 Plus
IPS, 2160x1080, 5.5
Honor View 10
IPS, 2160x1080, 5.99
Screen
11%
-32%
-12%
29%
Brightness middle
548
675
23%
411
-25%
431
-21%
530
-3%
Brightness
535
650
21%
426
-20%
419
-22%
523
-2%
Brightness Distribution
92
92
0%
82
-11%
89
-3%
88
-4%
Black Level *
0.49
0.46
6%
0.53
-8%
0.58
-18%
0.35
29%
Contrast
1118
1467
31%
775
-31%
743
-34%
1514
35%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
5.21
5.9
-13%
8.84
-70%
6.2
-19%
2.4
54%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
13.47
9.5
29%
15.08
-12%
10.1
25%
5.5
59%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
6.1
6.6
-8%
10.7
-75%
6.2
-2%
2.2
64%
Gamma
2.228 108%
2.36 102%
2.433 99%
2.26 106%
2.25 107%
CCT
7538 86%
7846 83%
10717 61%
8064 81%
6598 99%

* ... kleiner is beter

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Om de schermhelderheid te verlagen schakelen sommige laptops het backlight erg snel aan en uit. Dit gebeurt aan een dergelijk hoge frequentie dat het niet zichtbaar is voor het menselijk oog. Als de frequentie te laag is kunnen personen met gevoelige ogen geïrriteerd geraken, hoofdpijn krijgen en zelfs flickering waarnemen.
Screen flickering / PWM waargenomen 250 Hz ≤ 10 % helderheid instelling

Het backlight van het scherm flikkert aan 250 Hz (hoogstwaarschijnlijk met PWM - Pulse-Width Modulation) aan een helderheid van 10 % en lager. Boven deze helderheid zou er geen flickering / PWM mogen optreden.

De frequentie van 250 Hz is redelijk laag en de meeste mensen die gevoelig zijn aan flickering kunnen dit dus waarnemen of geïrriteerde ogen krijgen (gebruikmakend van de vermelde helderheid en lager).

Ter vergelijking: 53 % van alle geteste toestellen maakten geen gebruik van PWM om de schermhelderheid te verlagen. Als het wel werd gebruikt, werd een gemiddelde van 8813 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz waargenomen.

Responstijd Scherm

De responstijden van het scherm tonen hoe snel het scherm in staat is om van één kleur naar de andere te veranderen. Trage responstijden kunnen aanleiding geven tot 'nabeelden' rond bewegende objecten of het scherm wazig maken (blur). Vooral spelers van snelle 3D-games hebben baat bij een scherm met snelle responstijden.
       Responstijd Zwart naar Wit
20 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd↗ 7 ms stijging
↘ 13 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde prima responstijden in onze tests maar is misschien wat te traag voor competitieve games.
Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.8 (minimum) tot 240 (maximum) ms. » 18 % van alle toestellen zijn beter.
Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd beter is dan het gemiddelde (25.8 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.
       Responstijd 50% Grijs naar 80% Grijs
40 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd↗ 19 ms stijging
↘ 21 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde trage responstijden in onze tests en is misschien te traag voor games.
Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.9 (minimum) tot 636 (maximum) ms. » 44 % van alle toestellen zijn beter.
Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd vergelijkbaar is met het gemiddelde (41.3 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sorteer op waarde)
Sharp Aquos C10
71531 Points ∼41%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
115834 Points ∼67% +62%
JVC J20
67408 Points ∼39% -6%
LG Q7 Plus
44064 Points ∼25% -38%
Honor View 10
173653 Points ∼100% +143%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (67408 - 73617, n=9)
70799 Points ∼41% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (23275 - 230642, n=350)
70775 Points ∼41% -1%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sorteer op waarde)
Sharp Aquos C10
89351 Points ∼63%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
140875 Points ∼100% +58%
JVC J20
89279 Points ∼63% 0%
LG Q7 Plus
52855 Points ∼38% -41%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (87300 - 90435, n=7)
89327 Points ∼63% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (17073 - 290397, n=127)
100740 Points ∼72% +13%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sorteer op waarde)
Sharp Aquos C10
4636 Points ∼69%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
5965 Points ∼89% +29%
JVC J20
4836 Points ∼72% +4%
LG Q7 Plus
3080 Points ∼46% -34%
Honor View 10
6724 Points ∼100% +45%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (4636 - 5085, n=9)
4881 Points ∼73% +5%
Average of class Smartphone (2814 - 8601, n=214)
4398 Points ∼65% -5%
Work performance score (sorteer op waarde)
Sharp Aquos C10
5377 Points ∼65%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
6332 Points ∼76% +18%
JVC J20
5762 Points ∼69% +7%
LG Q7 Plus
3969 Points ∼48% -26%
Honor View 10
8306 Points ∼100% +54%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (5083 - 6264, n=9)
5696 Points ∼69% +6%
Average of class Smartphone (5960 - 10264, n=378)
4665 Points ∼56% -13%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sorteer op waarde)
Sharp Aquos C10
666 Points ∼56%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
1146 Points ∼97% +72%
JVC J20
862 Points ∼73% +29%
LG Q7 Plus
751 Points ∼63% +13%
Honor View 10
1184 Points ∼100% +78%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (666 - 925, n=9)
844 Points ∼71% +27%
Average of class Smartphone (7 - 1682, n=453)
666 Points ∼56% 0%
Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Sharp Aquos C10
1502 Points ∼39%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
2279 Points ∼59% +52%
JVC J20
1470 Points ∼38% -2%
LG Q7 Plus
631 Points ∼16% -58%
Honor View 10
3892 Points ∼100% +159%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (1470 - 1523, n=9)
1504 Points ∼39% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (18 - 9248, n=453)
1510 Points ∼39% +1%
Memory (sorteer op waarde)
Sharp Aquos C10
998 Points ∼23%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
2494 Points ∼58% +150%
JVC J20
1159 Points ∼27% +16%
LG Q7 Plus
800 Points ∼19% -20%
Honor View 10
4276 Points ∼100% +328%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (838 - 1405, n=9)
1201 Points ∼28% +20%
Average of class Smartphone (21 - 4798, n=453)
1124 Points ∼26% +13%
System (sorteer op waarde)
Sharp Aquos C10
1763 Points ∼34%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
5048 Points ∼97% +186%
JVC J20
3288 Points ∼63% +87%
LG Q7 Plus
1407 Points ∼27% -20%
Honor View 10
5195 Points ∼100% +195%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (1763 - 3319, n=9)
3099 Points ∼60% +76%
Average of class Smartphone (369 - 10281, n=453)
2257 Points ∼43% +28%
Overall (sorteer op waarde)
Sharp Aquos C10
1152 Points ∼36%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
2394 Points ∼75% +108%
JVC J20
1483 Points ∼47% +29%
LG Q7 Plus
855 Points ∼27% -26%
Honor View 10
3181 Points ∼100% +176%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (1152 - 1563, n=9)
1468 Points ∼46% +27%
Average of class Smartphone (150 - 4308, n=457)
1131 Points ∼36% -2%
Geekbench 4.1/4.2
Compute RenderScript Score (sorteer op waarde)
Sharp Aquos C10
2910 Points ∼32%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
5688 Points ∼63% +95%
JVC J20
3681 Points ∼41% +26%
LG Q7 Plus
2084 Points ∼23% -28%
Honor View 10
9015 Points ∼100% +210%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (2910 - 3956, n=8)
3697 Points ∼41% +27%
Average of class Smartphone (836 - 14417, n=153)
3853 Points ∼43% +32%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sorteer op waarde)
Sharp Aquos C10
2246 Points ∼33%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
5856 Points ∼86% +161%
JVC J20
4220 Points ∼62% +88%
LG Q7 Plus
2135 Points ∼31% -5%
Honor View 10
6785 Points ∼100% +202%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (883 - 4234, n=9)
3583 Points ∼53% +60%
Average of class Smartphone (1099 - 10558, n=200)
3952 Points ∼58% +76%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sorteer op waarde)
Sharp Aquos C10
710 Points ∼37%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
1579 Points ∼82% +122%
JVC J20
879 Points ∼46% +24%
LG Q7 Plus
639 Points ∼33% -10%
Honor View 10
1918 Points ∼100% +170%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (710 - 4210, n=9)
1218 Points ∼64% +72%
Average of class Smartphone (394 - 4265, n=201)
1159 Points ∼60% +63%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Sharp Aquos C10
1719 Points ∼59%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
2628 Points ∼90% +53%
JVC J20
1765 Points ∼60% +3%
LG Q7 Plus
1031 Points ∼35% -40%
Honor View 10
2931 Points ∼100% +71%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (1631 - 1822, n=9)
1747 Points ∼60% +2%
Average of class Smartphone (500 - 3669, n=303)
1544 Points ∼53% -10%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Sharp Aquos C10
712 Points ∼24%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
1196 Points ∼40% +68%
JVC J20
721 Points ∼24% +1%
LG Q7 Plus
80 Points ∼3% -89%
Honor View 10
2994 Points ∼100% +321%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (707 - 729, n=9)
720 Points ∼24% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (70 - 5220, n=303)
1049 Points ∼35% +47%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sorteer op waarde)
Sharp Aquos C10
819 Points ∼27%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
1361 Points ∼46% +66%
JVC J20
830 Points ∼28% +1%
LG Q7 Plus
101 Points ∼3% -88%
Honor View 10
2980 Points ∼100% +264%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (811 - 839, n=9)
828 Points ∼28% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (87 - 4734, n=311)
1006 Points ∼34% +23%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Sharp Aquos C10
1725 Points ∼65%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
2638 Points ∼100% +53%
JVC J20
1770 Points ∼67% +3%
LG Q7 Plus
1029 Points ∼39% -40%
Honor View 10
1906 Points ∼72% +10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (1698 - 1816, n=9)
1753 Points ∼66% +2%
Average of class Smartphone (474 - 3642, n=334)
1449 Points ∼55% -16%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Sharp Aquos C10
1286 Points ∼66%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
1938 Points ∼99% +51%
JVC J20
1257 Points ∼64% -2%
LG Q7 Plus
96 Points ∼5% -93%
Honor View 10
1954 Points ∼100% +52%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (1249 - 1289, n=9)
1262 Points ∼65% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (107 - 8312, n=334)
1423 Points ∼73% +11%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sorteer op waarde)
Sharp Aquos C10
1363 Points ∼66%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
2059 Points ∼100% +51%
JVC J20
1344 Points ∼65% -1%
LG Q7 Plus
120 Points ∼6% -91%
Honor View 10
1943 Points ∼94% +43%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (1332 - 1374, n=9)
1346 Points ∼65% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (120 - 6378, n=342)
1223 Points ∼59% -10%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Sharp Aquos C10
12667 Points ∼66%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
19050 Points ∼100% +50%
JVC J20
13153 Points ∼69% +4%
LG Q7 Plus
9903 Points ∼52% -22%
Honor View 10
14556 Points ∼76% +15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (12667 - 13196, n=9)
12981 Points ∼68% +2%
Average of class Smartphone (8065 - 36762, n=489)
12157 Points ∼64% -4%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sorteer op waarde)
Sharp Aquos C10
16508 Points ∼56%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
29306 Points ∼100% +78%
JVC J20
18471 Points ∼63% +12%
LG Q7 Plus
9656 Points ∼33% -42%
Honor View 10
22429 Points ∼77% +36%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (16508 - 18572, n=9)
18252 Points ∼62% +11%
Average of class Smartphone (2465 - 113380, n=489)
15596 Points ∼53% -6%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sorteer op waarde)
Sharp Aquos C10
15466 Points ∼59%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
26175 Points ∼100% +69%
JVC J20
16948 Points ∼65% +10%
LG Q7 Plus
9710 Points ∼37% -37%
Honor View 10
20022 Points ∼76% +29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (15466 - 17030, n=9)
16739 Points ∼64% +8%
Average of class Smartphone (2915 - 64405, n=490)
13491 Points ∼52% -13%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sorteer op waarde)
Sharp Aquos C10
30 fps ∼24%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
46 fps ∼37% +53%
JVC J20
29 fps ∼23% -3%
LG Q7 Plus
17 fps ∼14% -43%
Honor View 10
125 fps ∼100% +317%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (29 - 30, n=9)
29.8 fps ∼24% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (4.1 - 177, n=517)
27.4 fps ∼22% -9%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sorteer op waarde)
Sharp Aquos C10
30 fps ∼51%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
51 fps ∼86% +70%
JVC J20
28 fps ∼47% -7%
LG Q7 Plus
16 fps ∼27% -47%
Honor View 10
59 fps ∼100% +97%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (28 - 31, n=9)
29.8 fps ∼51% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (6.9 - 120, n=520)
23.6 fps ∼40% -21%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sorteer op waarde)
Sharp Aquos C10
14 fps ∼21%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
23 fps ∼35% +64%
JVC J20
14 fps ∼21% 0%
LG Q7 Plus
7.1 fps ∼11% -49%
Honor View 10
66 fps ∼100% +371%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (14 - 14, n=9)
14 fps ∼21% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (2.2 - 88.2, n=440)
14.5 fps ∼22% +4%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sorteer op waarde)
Sharp Aquos C10
14 fps ∼25%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
22 fps ∼40% +57%
JVC J20
13 fps ∼24% -7%
LG Q7 Plus
6.8 fps ∼12% -51%
Honor View 10
55 fps ∼100% +293%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (13 - 15, n=9)
14.2 fps ∼26% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (4.4 - 115, n=442)
14.6 fps ∼27% +4%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Sharp Aquos C10
10 fps ∼48%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
15 fps ∼71% +50%
JVC J20
9.7 fps ∼46% -3%
LG Q7 Plus
4.7 fps ∼22% -53%
Honor View 10
21 fps ∼100% +110%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (5.2 - 10, n=9)
9.24 fps ∼44% -8%
Average of class Smartphone (1.3 - 60, n=304)
12.5 fps ∼60% +25%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Sharp Aquos C10
9.8 fps ∼27%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
14 fps ∼39% +43%
JVC J20
9.2 fps ∼26% -6%
LG Q7 Plus
4.5 fps ∼13% -54%
Honor View 10
36 fps ∼100% +267%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (9.2 - 11, n=9)
9.97 fps ∼28% +2%
Average of class Smartphone (2.6 - 110, n=306)
12.6 fps ∼35% +29%
GFXBench
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Sharp Aquos C10
5.6 fps ∼27%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
9.1 fps ∼43% +63%
JVC J20
5.5 fps ∼26% -2%
LG Q7 Plus
2.5 fps ∼12% -55%
Honor View 10
21 fps ∼100% +275%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (5.3 - 5.6, n=9)
5.49 fps ∼26% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (0.72 - 35, n=236)
8.57 fps ∼41% +53%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Sharp Aquos C10
6 fps ∼29%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
8.6 fps ∼41% +43%
JVC J20
5.2 fps ∼25% -13%
LG Q7 Plus
2.4 fps ∼11% -60%
Honor View 10
21 fps ∼100% +250%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (5.2 - 6, n=9)
5.64 fps ∼27% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (1.1 - 50, n=239)
7.84 fps ∼37% +31%

Legende

 
Sharp Aquos C10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Qualcomm Adreno 508, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Qualcomm Adreno 512, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
JVC J20 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Qualcomm Adreno 508, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
LG Q7 Plus Mediatek MT6750S, ARM Mali-T860 MP2, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Honor View 10 HiSilicon Kirin 970, ARM Mali-G72 MP12, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro (Chrome 67)
49.396 Points ∼100% +75%
Honor View 10 (Chrome 63)
34.871 Points ∼71% +23%
Average of class Smartphone (10.8 - 224, n=372)
33.4 Points ∼68% +18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (27.4 - 30.8, n=9)
28.4 Points ∼57% 0%
Sharp Aquos C10 (Chrome 68)
28.27 Points ∼57%
JVC J20 (Chrome 68)
28.25 Points ∼57% 0%
LG Q7 Plus (Chrome 67)
18.694 Points ∼38% -34%
Octane V2 - Total Score
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro (Chrome 67)
9582 Points ∼100% +84%
Honor View 10 (Chrome 63)
6729 Points ∼70% +29%
Sharp Aquos C10 (Chrome 68)
5202 Points ∼54%
JVC J20 (Chrome 68)
5117 Points ∼53% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (1506 - 35255, n=508)
4996 Points ∼52% -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (4398 - 5202, n=9)
4943 Points ∼52% -5%
LG Q7 Plus (Chrome 67)
3422 Points ∼36% -34%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
LG Q7 Plus (Chrome 67)
13670.9 ms * ∼100% -43%
Average of class Smartphone (718 - 59466, n=527)
11914 ms * ∼87% -25%
JVC J20 (Chrome 68)
9660 ms * ∼71% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (8396 - 10236, n=9)
9587 ms * ∼70% -1%
Sharp Aquos C10 (Chrome 68)
9532.6 ms * ∼70%
Honor View 10 (Chrome 63)
6013 ms * ∼44% +37%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro (Chrome 67)
4093.5 ms * ∼30% +57%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro (Chrome 67)
159 Points ∼100% +37%
Honor View 10 (Chrome 63)
157 Points ∼99% +35%
Sharp Aquos C10 (Chrome 68)
116 Points ∼73%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (86 - 117, n=8)
105 Points ∼66% -9%
Average of class Smartphone (27 - 362, n=249)
99.9 Points ∼63% -14%
LG Q7 Plus (Chrome 67)
70 Points ∼44% -40%

* ... kleiner is beter

Sharp Aquos C10BQ Aquaris X2 ProJVC J20LG Q7 PlusHonor View 10Average 64 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-1%
-8%
-14%
205%
-11%
-32%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
60.7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
61.13 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
1%
63 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
4%
62.2 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
2%
65.06 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
7%
52.3 (14.1 - 74.7, n=55)
-14%
43.9 (3.4 - 87.1, n=284)
-28%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
83 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
83.35 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
0%
82.8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
0%
81.45 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-2%
81 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-2%
71.3 (21.1 - 86.9, n=55)
-14%
62.3 (8.2 - 96.5, n=284)
-25%
Random Write 4KB
16.9
15.43
-9%
6.3
-63%
11.91
-30%
160
847%
16.1 (3.4 - 72.6, n=64)
-5%
13.6 (0.14 - 164, n=566)
-20%
Random Read 4KB
48.2
51.25
6%
58.3
21%
35.8
-26%
144.3
199%
47.4 (11.4 - 149, n=64)
-2%
34.9 (1.59 - 173, n=566)
-28%
Sequential Write 256KB
213.4
204.83
-4%
199.7
-6%
186.55
-13%
194.3
-9%
159 (40 - 216, n=64)
-25%
73.2 (2.99 - 228, n=566)
-66%
Sequential Read 256KB
283.8
280.78
-1%
270.6
-5%
235.9
-17%
810.3
186%
267 (115 - 704, n=64)
-6%
214 (12.1 - 832, n=566)
-25%
Arena of Valor
 InstellingenWaarde
 min31 fps
 high HD30 fps
  Your browser does not support the canvas element!
Shadow Fight 3
 InstellingenWaarde
 high56 fps
 minimal55 fps
  Your browser does not support the canvas element!
Max. Belasting
 40.1 °C38.9 °C38.7 °C 
 40.4 °C39.1 °C39.9 °C 
 39.2 °C39.1 °C38.2 °C 
Maximum: 40.4 °C
Gemiddelde: 39.3 °C
37.4 °C38.5 °C40.9 °C
37.2 °C38.2 °C42.8 °C
37.4 °C38.1 °C42.2 °C
Maximum: 42.8 °C
Gemiddelde: 39.2 °C
Stroomadapter (max.)  42.1 °C | Kamertemperatuur 22.2 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2032332531.931.23131.7314031.128.15036.235.46326.326.58022.224.710022.522.912525.425.216018.931.420017.140.125016.944.23151448.540013.55650013.857.363012.559.380012.157.4100011.462.6125011.265.616001168.6200010.870250010.569.3315010.868400010.367.3500010.368.6630010.468.6800010.564.31000010.461.51250010.357.51600010.441.4SPL64.65370.765.523.879N16.87.52718.20.541.3median 11.2Sharp Aquos C10median 59.3Delta2.512.338.138.637.637.235.936.428.130.828.627.627.824.129.824.230.425.422.227.223.9342041.319.445.517.247.816.454.816.556.915.159.615.161.114.662.514.467.313.772.712.373.812.173.411.871.411.767.811.76111.657.811.652.111.556.311.55311.642.966.356.725.98116.810.40.840.9median 14.4JVC J20median 56.93.39.5hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Sharp Aquos C10 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 29% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 59% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 58% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

JVC J20 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 50% of all tested devices in this class were better, 13% similar, 37% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 72% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 21% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Stroomgebruik
Uit / Standbydarklight 0.05 / 0.2 Watt
Inactiefdarkmidlight 0.9 / 2.2 / 3.8 Watt
Belasting midlight 6.2 / 8 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Sharp Aquos C10
2700 mAh
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
3100 mAh
JVC J20
3400 mAh
LG Q7 Plus
3000 mAh
Honor View 10
3750 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
21%
21%
27%
4%
28%
28%
Idle Minimum *
0.9
0.63
30%
1
-11%
1
-11%
1.05
-17%
0.706 (0.39 - 1, n=9)
22%
0.872 (0.2 - 3.4, n=587)
3%
Idle Average *
2.2
2.16
2%
1.6
27%
1.57
29%
2.36
-7%
1.888 (1.51 - 2.31, n=9)
14%
1.703 (0.6 - 6.2, n=586)
23%
Idle Maximum *
3.8
2.18
43%
2.8
26%
1.64
57%
2.41
37%
2.23 (1.57 - 3.8, n=9)
41%
1.968 (0.74 - 6.6, n=587)
48%
Load Average *
6.2
4.48
28%
4
35%
4.1
34%
4.93
20%
3.97 (2.82 - 6.2, n=9)
36%
3.99 (0.8 - 10.8, n=581)
36%
Load Maximum *
8
7.87
2%
5.9
26%
6.02
25%
9.04
-13%
5.77 (4.56 - 8, n=9)
28%
5.63 (1.2 - 14.2, n=581)
30%

* ... kleiner is beter

Batterijduur
Inactief (zonder WLAN, minimale helderheid)
23h 45min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
11h 12min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
12h 15min
Belast (maximale helderheid)
4h 27min
Sharp Aquos C10
2700 mAh
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
3100 mAh
JVC J20
3400 mAh
LG Q7 Plus
3000 mAh
Honor View 10
3750 mAh
Batterijduur
-18%
8%
-23%
11%
Reader / Idle
1425
1374
-4%
980
-31%
1671
17%
H.264
735
658
-10%
455
-38%
819
11%
WiFi v1.3
672
605
-10%
726
8%
620
-8%
679
1%
Load
267
145
-46%
230
-14%
305
14%

Pro

+ helder beeldscherm
+ scherpe camera beelden
+ goede batterijduur
+ geen bloatware
+ snelle werking
+ snel WLAN

Contra

- matige kwaliteit stemgeluid
- geen 3.5-mm audio poort
- weinig LTE-banden
- throttling bij langduriger belasting
In review: Sharp Aquos C10. Test unit provided by notebooksbilliger.de
In review: Sharp Aquos C10. Test unit provided by notebooksbilliger.de

Dit is de verkorte versie van het originele artikel. Het volledige, Engelse testrapport vind je hier.

Sharp's terugkeer op de westerse smartphone markt is een lastige taak, en met de Sharp Aquos C10 slaagt de fabrikant er met de eerste poging in om een solide middenklasse smartphone op de markt te zetten. De smartphone kan overtuigen met zijn heldere beeldscherm, goede camera's, fatsoenlijke batterijduur en snelle WLAN. De prestaties zijn allemaal voldoende en de Sharp smartphone voelt over het algemeen snel aan. Er zijn echter enkele smartphones in deze prijsklasse die aanzienlijk krachtiger zijn. Daarnaast is er merkbaar sprake van throttling in de Sharp Aquos C10 bij langduriger belasting.

Met de Aquos C10 maakt Sharp een goede rentre op de westerse markt. Met name de camera's, WLAN-snelheid en de batterijduur zijn overtuigend.

Aan de andere kant kunnen potentiële klanten zich ergeren aan het ontbreken van een 3.5-mm poort, matige stemkwaliteit en natuurlijk kan de inkeping in het beeldscherm een dealbreker zijn voor sommigen. Diegenen die de ongebruikelijke vormgeving kunnen waarderen en niet de krachtigste hardware nodig hebben, zullen een goede smartphone in handen krijgen die niet een dertien in een dozijn is.

Sharp Aquos C10 - 20-08-2018 v6
Florian Wimmer

Behuizing
77%
Toetsenbord
67 / 75 → 89%
Aanwijsapparaat
90%
Aansluitmogelijkheden
46 / 60 → 76%
Gewicht
93%
Batterij
94%
Beeldscherm
84%
Gaming-performance
34 / 63 → 53%
Applicatie-performance
46 / 70 → 66%
Temperatuur
88%
Luidheid
100%
Audio
54 / 91 → 59%
Camera
76%
Gemiddelde
73%
84%
Smartphone - Gewogen Gemiddelde

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Overzichten en testrapporten over laptops en mobieltjes > Testrapporten > Kort testrapport Sharp Aquos C10 Smartphone
Florian Wimmer, 2018-08-29 (Update: 2018-08-29)