Notebookcheck

Kort testrapport Samsung Galaxy M30s Smartphone: Een enorme batterij voor een betaalbare prijs

Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt, 01-12-2019

Een normaal monster. De Galaxy M-serie wordt gekenmerkt door bescheiden middenklasse smartphones met moderne ontwerpen en enorme batterijen. De Galaxy M30s is niet anders, met het een 6000 mAh batterij ondanks zijn relatief compacte afmetingen. Lees verder om erachter te komen of het nieuwste model in de Galaxy M-serie meer te bieden heeft dan alleen maar een geweldige batterij.

Samsung Galaxy M30s (Galaxy M Serie)
Processor
Samsung Exynos 9611
Grafische kaart
ARM Mali-G72 MP3
Geheugen
4096 MB 
Beeldscherm
6.4 inch 19.5:9, 2340 x 1080 pixel 403 PPI, capacitief touchscreen, Super AMOLED, glimmend: ja
Opslag
64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 64 GB 
, , 50.5 GB beschikbaar
Verbindingen
1 USB 2.0, Audio Verbindingen: 3.5 mm poort, Card Reader: tot 512 GB microSD kaarten. aparte microSD kaartslot, 1 Vingerafdruklezer, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensoren: Accelerometer, kompas, gyroscoop, nabijheidssensor, USB Type-C
Netwerkmogelijkheden
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.0, 2G: 850, 900, 1,800, 1,900 MHz. 3G: B1, B2, B5, B8. 4G: B1, B3, B5, B7, B8, B20, B38, B40, B41., Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Afmetingen
hoogte x breedte x diepte (in mm): 8.9 x 159 x 75.1
Batterij
6000 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Besturingssysteem
Android 9.0 Pie
Camera
Primary Camera: 48 MPix , f/2.0, fase-detectie autofocus (PDAF), LED flits, video's tot 2160p/30 FPS. 8.0 MPix ultra-groothoeklens, f/2.2,. 5.0 MPix depth of field camera, f/2.2.
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix , f/2.0
Bijkomende functionaliteiten
Luidsprekers: Mono luidspreker aan de onderkant van het apparaat, Toetsenbord: virtueel toetsenbord, Snellader, USB kabel, SIM tool, 24 Maanden Garantie, LTE snelheid: 600 Mbps downloads en 150 Mbps uploads. SAR waardes: Body - 1,130 W/kg, Head - 0.492 W/kg. FM radio, fanless
Gewicht
188 g, Voeding: 64 g
Prijs
249 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Device comparison

EvaluatieDatumModelGewichtDriveFormaatResolutieBest Price
80%12-2019Samsung Galaxy M30s
Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3
188 g64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.4"2340x1080
79%11-2019Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
665, Adreno 610
190 g128 GB eMMC Flash6.3"2340x1080
78%11-2019Motorola Moto G8 Plus
665, Adreno 610
188 g64 GB eMMC Flash6.3"2280x1080
78%09-2019Xiaomi Mi A3
665, Adreno 610
173.8 g64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.09"1560x720
80%04-2019Samsung Galaxy M20
7904, Mali-G71 MP2
186 g64 GB eMMC Flash6.3"2340x1080
Samsung Galaxy M30s
Samsung Galaxy M30s
Samsung Galaxy M30s
Samsung Galaxy M30s
Samsung Galaxy M30s
Samsung Galaxy M30s
Samsung Galaxy M30s

Size Comparison

159 mm 75.1 mm 8.9 mm 188 g158.4 mm 75.8 mm 9.1 mm 188 g158.3 mm 75.3 mm 8.3 mm 190 g156.4 mm 74.5 mm 8.8 mm 186 g153.5 mm 71.9 mm 8.5 mm 173.8 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Adreno 610, 665, 128 GB eMMC Flash
339 (min: 320, max: 349) MBit/s ∼100% +3%
Samsung Galaxy M30s
Mali-G72 MP3, Exynos 9611, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
328 (min: 270, max: 341) MBit/s ∼97%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 939, n=456)
230 MBit/s ∼68% -30%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Adreno 610, 665, 64 GB eMMC Flash
182 (min: 11, max: 259) MBit/s ∼54% -45%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Adreno 610, 665, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
158 (min: 18, max: 227) MBit/s ∼47% -52%
Samsung Galaxy M20
Mali-G71 MP2, 7904, 64 GB eMMC Flash
64 (min: 52, max: 69) MBit/s ∼19% -80%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Samsung Galaxy M30s
Mali-G72 MP3, Exynos 9611, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
323 (min: 257, max: 351) MBit/s ∼100%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Adreno 610, 665, 128 GB eMMC Flash
303 (min: 242, max: 355) MBit/s ∼94% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 703, n=456)
218 MBit/s ∼67% -33%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Adreno 610, 665, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
172 (min: 2, max: 282) MBit/s ∼53% -47%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Adreno 610, 665, 64 GB eMMC Flash
152 (min: 1, max: 254) MBit/s ∼47% -53%
Samsung Galaxy M20
Mali-G71 MP2, 7904, 64 GB eMMC Flash
41 (min: 2, max: 93) MBit/s ∼13% -87%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø328 (270-341)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø323 (257-351)
GPS test: Samsung Galaxy M30s - Overzicht
GPS test: Samsung Galaxy M30s - Overzicht
GPS test: Samsung Galaxy M30s - Lus
GPS test: Samsung Galaxy M30s - Lus
GPS test: Samsung Galaxy M30s - Brug
GPS test: Samsung Galaxy M30s - Brug
GPS test: Garmin Edge 520 - Overzicht
GPS test: Garmin Edge 520 - Overzicht
GPS test: Garmin Edge 520 - Lus
GPS test: Garmin Edge 520 - Lus
GPS test: Garmin Edge 520 - Brug
GPS test: Garmin Edge 520 - Brug

Beeldvergelijking

Bekijk een scène en navigeer binnen het eerste beeld. Eén klik wijzigt het zoomniveau. Eén klik op het ingezoomde beeld opent het origineel in een nieuw venster. Het eerste beeld toont de verschaalde foto van het testtoestel.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
ColorChecker Photo
27.6 ∆E
46 ∆E
36.1 ∆E
31.7 ∆E
40.8 ∆E
55.5 ∆E
44.2 ∆E
31.1 ∆E
33.4 ∆E
27.6 ∆E
54.4 ∆E
52.9 ∆E
27.3 ∆E
43.1 ∆E
29.5 ∆E
57.6 ∆E
36.2 ∆E
38.3 ∆E
64.3 ∆E
64.3 ∆E
47.1 ∆E
34.3 ∆E
23.3 ∆E
13.4 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy M30s: 39.99 ∆E min: 13.38 - max: 64.29 ∆E
ColorChecker Photo
19.9 ∆E
12.1 ∆E
19.3 ∆E
27.7 ∆E
16.3 ∆E
9.5 ∆E
11 ∆E
16.6 ∆E
15.9 ∆E
11.7 ∆E
11.9 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
8.3 ∆E
14.8 ∆E
16.4 ∆E
4 ∆E
11.3 ∆E
16.9 ∆E
3 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
11.5 ∆E
18.9 ∆E
18.3 ∆E
2.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy M30s: 12.96 ∆E min: 2.88 - max: 27.75 ∆E
Een foto van onze testkaart in gecontroleerde condities
Een foto van onze testkaart in gecontroleerde condities
Een foto van onze testkaart bij 1 lux
581
cd/m²
601
cd/m²
606
cd/m²
592
cd/m²
600
cd/m²
609
cd/m²
587
cd/m²
597
cd/m²
603
cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 609 cd/m² Gemiddelde: 597.3 cd/m² Minimum: 3.74 cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling: 95 %
Helderheid in Batterij-modus: 600 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Zwart: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.5 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6
ΔE Greyscale 2 | 0.64-98 Ø6.2
98.4% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.013
Samsung Galaxy M30s
Super AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.4
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
IPS, 2340x1080, 6.3
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
IPS, 2280x1080, 6.3
Xiaomi Mi A3
AMOLED, 1560x720, 6.09
Samsung Galaxy M20
PLS TFT, 2340x1080, 6.3
Screen
22%
-56%
-70%
-73%
Brightness middle
600
656
9%
597
0%
348
-42%
452
-25%
Brightness
597
643
8%
596
0%
355
-41%
445
-25%
Brightness Distribution
95
95
0%
93
-2%
91
-4%
92
-3%
Black Level *
0.54
0.52
0.41
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
2.5
1.1
56%
5.93
-137%
5.86
-134%
5.3
-112%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
7.17
2.4
67%
9.42
-31%
15.6
-118%
9.5
-32%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
2
2.2
-10%
5.3
-165%
3.6
-80%
6.8
-240%
Gamma
2.013 109%
2.2 100%
2.232 99%
2.232 99%
2.23 99%
CCT
6399 102%
6263 104%
7632 85%
7051 92%
8355 78%
Contrast
1215
1148
1102

* ... kleiner is beter

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Om de schermhelderheid te verlagen schakelen sommige laptops het backlight erg snel aan en uit. Dit gebeurt aan een dergelijk hoge frequentie dat het niet zichtbaar is voor het menselijk oog. Als de frequentie te laag is kunnen personen met gevoelige ogen geïrriteerd geraken, hoofdpijn krijgen en zelfs flickering waarnemen.
Screen flickering / PWM waargenomen 118 Hz

Het backlight van het scherm flikkert aan 118 Hz (hoogstwaarschijnlijk met PWM - Pulse-Width Modulation) .

De frequentie van 118 Hz is erg laag en kan dus aanleiding geven tot geïrriteerde ogen en hoofdpijn bij langer gebruik.

Ter vergelijking: 51 % van alle geteste toestellen maakten geen gebruik van PWM om de schermhelderheid te verlagen. Als het wel werd gebruikt, werd een gemiddelde van 9355 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz waargenomen.

Responstijd Scherm

De responstijden van het scherm tonen hoe snel het scherm in staat is om van één kleur naar de andere te veranderen. Trage responstijden kunnen aanleiding geven tot 'nabeelden' rond bewegende objecten of het scherm wazig maken (blur). Vooral spelers van snelle 3D-games hebben baat bij een scherm met snelle responstijden.
       Responstijd Zwart naar Wit
8 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd↗ 5 ms stijging
↘ 3 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde snelle responstijden in onze tests en zou geschikt moeten zijn voor games.
Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.8 (minimum) tot 240 (maximum) ms. » 7 % van alle toestellen zijn beter.
Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd beter is dan het gemiddelde (24.8 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.
       Responstijd 50% Grijs naar 80% Grijs
10 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd↗ 5 ms stijging
↘ 5 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde prima responstijden in onze tests maar is misschien wat te traag voor competitieve games.
Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.9 (minimum) tot 636 (maximum) ms. » 8 % van alle toestellen zijn beter.
Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd beter is dan het gemiddelde (39.4 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.
Geekbench 5
Vulkan Score (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy M30s
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
663 Points ∼44%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
422 Points ∼28% -36%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
422 Points ∼28% -36%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
 
663 Points ∼44% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (183 - 3222, n=29)
1518 Points ∼100% +129%
OpenCL Score (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy M30s
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1393 Points ∼70%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
363 Points ∼18% -74%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
370 Points ∼18% -73%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
 
1393 Points ∼70% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (183 - 4593, n=35)
2004 Points ∼100% +44%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy M30s
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1299 Points ∼66%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
1327 Points ∼67% +2%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1379 Points ∼70% +6%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
 
1299 Points ∼66% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (807 - 3575, n=46)
1979 Points ∼100% +52%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy M30s
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
349 Points ∼61%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
314 Points ∼55% -10%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
315 Points ∼55% -10%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
 
349 Points ∼61% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (155 - 1344, n=46)
572 Points ∼100% +64%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy M30s
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
5925 Points ∼91%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
6498 Points ∼99% +10%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
6534 Points ∼100% +10%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
6396 Points ∼98% +8%
Samsung Galaxy M20
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
5269 Points ∼81% -11%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
 
5925 Points ∼91% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2630 - 11690, n=396)
5356 Points ∼82% -10%
Work performance score (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy M30s
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
6697 Points ∼82%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
7446 Points ∼91% +11%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
8186 Points ∼100% +22%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
7984 Points ∼98% +19%
Samsung Galaxy M20
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
5802 Points ∼71% -13%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
 
6697 Points ∼82% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1077 - 15193, n=563)
5817 Points ∼71% -13%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy M30s
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2134 Points ∼80%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
2250 Points ∼84% +5%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2268 Points ∼85% +6%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2300 Points ∼86% +8%
Samsung Galaxy M20
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
2028 Points ∼76% -5%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
 
2134 Points ∼80% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1740 - 15735, n=73)
2674 Points ∼100% +25%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy M30s
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1320 Points ∼48%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
898 Points ∼33% -32%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
901 Points ∼33% -32%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
908 Points ∼33% -31%
Samsung Galaxy M20
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
964 Points ∼35% -27%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
 
1320 Points ∼48% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (203 - 14536, n=73)
2752 Points ∼100% +108%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy M30s
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1442 Points ∼58%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
1036 Points ∼41% -28%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1040 Points ∼42% -28%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1049 Points ∼42% -27%
Samsung Galaxy M20
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
1091 Points ∼44% -24%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
 
1442 Points ∼58% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (253 - 14786, n=73)
2504 Points ∼100% +74%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy M30s
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2103 Points ∼88%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
2298 Points ∼96% +9%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2341 Points ∼98% +11%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2387 Points ∼100% +14%
Samsung Galaxy M20
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
1657 Points ∼69% -21%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
 
2103 Points ∼88% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 4737, n=403)
1988 Points ∼83% -5%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy M30s
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1267 Points ∼70%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
980 Points ∼54% -23%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
981 Points ∼54% -23%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
987 Points ∼55% -22%
Samsung Galaxy M20
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
488 Points ∼27% -61%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
 
1267 Points ∼70% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (75 - 8374, n=403)
1803 Points ∼100% +42%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy M30s
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1390 Points ∼83%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
1134 Points ∼68% -18%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1126 Points ∼67% -19%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1135 Points ∼68% -18%
Samsung Galaxy M20
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
579 Points ∼35% -58%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
 
1390 Points ∼83% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (93 - 6916, n=404)
1673 Points ∼100% +20%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy M30s
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2275 Points ∼95%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
2348 Points ∼98% +3%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2393 Points ∼100% +5%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2343 Points ∼98% +3%
Samsung Galaxy M20
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
1677 Points ∼70% -26%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
 
2275 Points ∼95% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 4725, n=432)
1898 Points ∼79% -17%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy M30s
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1634 Points ∼68%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
1668 Points ∼69% +2%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1670 Points ∼69% +2%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1674 Points ∼70% +2%
Samsung Galaxy M20
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
650 Points ∼27% -60%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
 
1634 Points ∼68% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (70 - 20154, n=432)
2406 Points ∼100% +47%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy M30s
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1743 Points ∼86%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
1778 Points ∼88% +2%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1790 Points ∼89% +3%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1787 Points ∼89% +3%
Samsung Galaxy M20
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
752 Points ∼37% -57%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
 
1743 Points ∼86% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (88 - 10427, n=432)
2018 Points ∼100% +16%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy M30s
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2255 Points ∼91%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
2408 Points ∼97% +7%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2424 Points ∼98% +7%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2477 Points ∼100% +10%
Samsung Galaxy M20
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
1657 Points ∼67% -27%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
 
2255 Points ∼91% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (486 - 4519, n=483)
1896 Points ∼77% -16%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy M30s
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1203 Points ∼81%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
967 Points ∼65% -20%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
979 Points ∼66% -19%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
931 Points ∼62% -23%
Samsung Galaxy M20
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
488 Points ∼33% -59%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
 
1203 Points ∼81% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53 - 7150, n=483)
1493 Points ∼100% +24%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy M30s
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1342 Points ∼93%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
1114 Points ∼78% -17%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1128 Points ∼79% -16%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1081 Points ∼75% -19%
Samsung Galaxy M20
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
582 Points ∼41% -57%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
 
1342 Points ∼93% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 6319, n=484)
1436 Points ∼100% +7%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy M30s
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2286 Points ∼93%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
2378 Points ∼96% +4%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2452 Points ∼99% +7%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2471 Points ∼100% +8%
Samsung Galaxy M20
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
1677 Points ∼68% -27%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
 
2286 Points ∼93% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (293 - 4540, n=524)
1759 Points ∼71% -23%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy M30s
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1468 Points ∼75%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
1607 Points ∼82% +9%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1634 Points ∼83% +11%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1651 Points ∼84% +12%
Samsung Galaxy M20
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
650 Points ∼33% -56%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
 
1468 Points ∼75% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 11302, n=523)
1959 Points ∼100% +33%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy M30s
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1595 Points ∼90%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
1728 Points ∼97% +8%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1765 Points ∼99% +11%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1782 Points ∼100% +12%
Samsung Galaxy M20
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
752 Points ∼42% -53%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
 
1595 Points ∼90% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 8338, n=526)
1689 Points ∼95% +6%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy M30s
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
20118 Points ∼99%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
20354 Points ∼100% +1%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
18698 Points ∼92% -7%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
19552 Points ∼96% -3%
Samsung Galaxy M20
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
12500 Points ∼61% -38%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
 
20118 Points ∼99% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (735 - 45072, n=684)
14281 Points ∼70% -29%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy M30s
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
15971 Points ∼63%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
24654 Points ∼98% +54%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
24992 Points ∼99% +56%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
25219 Points ∼100% +58%
Samsung Galaxy M20
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
13392 Points ∼53% -16%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
 
15971 Points ∼63% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (536 - 209204, n=682)
22374 Points ∼89% +40%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy M30s
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
16738 Points ∼71%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
23534 Points ∼99% +41%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
23253 Points ∼98% +39%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
23693 Points ∼100% +42%
Samsung Galaxy M20
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
13183 Points ∼56% -21%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
 
16738 Points ∼71% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (662 - 97276, n=682)
18053 Points ∼76% +8%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy M30s
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
41 fps ∼100%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
36 fps ∼88% -12%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
36 fps ∼88% -12%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
36 fps ∼88% -12%
Samsung Galaxy M20
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
14 fps ∼34% -66%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
 
41 fps ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.5 - 322, n=702)
38.3 fps ∼93% -7%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy M30s
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
37 fps ∼71%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
33 fps ∼63% -11%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
34 fps ∼65% -8%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
52 fps ∼100% +41%
Samsung Galaxy M20
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
12 fps ∼23% -68%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
 
37 fps ∼71% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 120, n=711)
28.2 fps ∼54% -24%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy M30s
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
20 fps ∼90%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
19 fps ∼86% -5%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
20 fps ∼90% 0%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
20 fps ∼90% 0%
Samsung Galaxy M20
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
7 fps ∼32% -65%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
 
20 fps ∼90% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.8 - 175, n=607)
22.1 fps ∼100% +11%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy M30s
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
17 fps ∼50%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
17 fps ∼50% 0%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
18 fps ∼53% +6%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
34 fps ∼100% +100%
Samsung Galaxy M20
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
6.2 fps ∼18% -64%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
 
17 fps ∼50% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 115, n=616)
19.5 fps ∼57% +15%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy M30s
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
14 fps ∼78%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
13 fps ∼72% -7%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
13 fps ∼72% -7%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
13 fps ∼72% -7%
Samsung Galaxy M20
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
4.3 fps ∼24% -69%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
 
14 fps ∼78% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.87 - 117, n=472)
18 fps ∼100% +29%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy M30s
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
14 fps ∼54%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
12 fps ∼46% -14%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
12 fps ∼46% -14%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
26 fps ∼100% +86%
Samsung Galaxy M20
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
3.8 fps ∼15% -73%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
 
14 fps ∼54% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 110, n=474)
16.8 fps ∼65% +20%
GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy M30s
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
8.3 fps ∼82%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
2.8 fps ∼28% -66%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
4.5 fps ∼45% -46%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
9.1 fps ∼90% +10%
Samsung Galaxy M20
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
2.7 fps ∼27% -67%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
 
8.3 fps ∼82% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.61 - 60, n=195)
10.1 fps ∼100% +22%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy M30s
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
3.6 fps ∼51%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
4.4 fps ∼63% +22%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2.8 fps ∼40% -22%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2.8 fps ∼40% -22%
Samsung Galaxy M20
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
1.7 fps ∼24% -53%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
 
3.6 fps ∼51% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.21 - 33, n=194)
7 fps ∼100% +94%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy M30s
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
8.8 fps ∼59%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
7.2 fps ∼48% -18%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
7.6 fps ∼51% -14%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
15 fps ∼100% +70%
Samsung Galaxy M20
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
4.3 fps ∼29% -51%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
 
8.8 fps ∼59% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 60, n=199)
14.8 fps ∼99% +68%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy M30s
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
9.8 fps ∼59%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
8.1 fps ∼49% -17%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
8.2 fps ∼49% -16%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
8.4 fps ∼51% -14%
Samsung Galaxy M20
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
4.7 fps ∼28% -52%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
 
9.8 fps ∼59% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 87, n=199)
16.6 fps ∼100% +69%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy M30s
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
9.6 fps ∼78%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
6.9 fps ∼56% -28%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
7.2 fps ∼59% -25%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
7.1 fps ∼58% -26%
Samsung Galaxy M20
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
2.6 fps ∼21% -73%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
 
9.6 fps ∼78% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 73, n=397)
12.3 fps ∼100% +28%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy M30s
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
8.8 fps ∼68%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
6.1 fps ∼47% -31%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
6.6 fps ∼51% -25%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
13 fps ∼100% +48%
Samsung Galaxy M20
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
2.7 fps ∼21% -69%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
 
8.8 fps ∼68% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.1 - 60, n=401)
11 fps ∼85% +25%
Basemark GPU
1920x1080 OpenGL Medium Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy M30s
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
13.8 fps ∼16%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
8.24 (min: 5.77, max: 20.65) fps ∼10% -40%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
11.99 fps ∼14% -13%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
 
13.8 fps ∼16% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (8.24 - 4528, n=65)
86.3 fps ∼100% +525%
Vulkan Medium Native (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy M30s
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
10.82 fps ∼17%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
6.65 (min: 3.4, max: 18.65) fps ∼10% -39%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
10.74 fps ∼17% -1%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
 
10.8 fps ∼17% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.57 - 2850, n=57)
63.9 fps ∼100% +491%
1920x1080 Vulkan Medium Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy M30s
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
12.34 fps ∼13%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
7.44 (min: 3.6, max: 21.99) fps ∼8% -40%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
 
12.3 fps ∼12% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.88 - 4462, n=55)
98.5 fps ∼100% +698%
VRMark - Amber Room (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy M30s
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1755 Score ∼79%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
1134 Score ∼51% -35%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1092 Score ∼49% -38%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
 
1755 Score ∼79% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (119 - 5025, n=62)
2227 Score ∼100% +27%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy M30s
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1025 Points ∼73%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
937 Points ∼67% -9%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
926 Points ∼66% -10%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1400 Points ∼100% +37%
Samsung Galaxy M20
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
984 Points ∼70% -4%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
 
1025 Points ∼73% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7 - 1745, n=640)
763 Points ∼55% -26%
Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy M30s
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2127 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
1881 Points ∼88% -12%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1916 Points ∼90% -10%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1886 Points ∼89% -11%
Samsung Galaxy M20
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
1038 Points ∼49% -51%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
 
2127 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (18 - 16996, n=640)
2094 Points ∼98% -2%
Memory (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy M30s
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2122 Points ∼67%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
2808 Points ∼88% +32%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2835 Points ∼89% +34%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
3174 Points ∼100% +50%
Samsung Galaxy M20
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
2973 Points ∼94% +40%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
 
2122 Points ∼67% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (21 - 7500, n=640)
1546 Points ∼49% -27%
System (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy M30s
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
4978 Points ∼98%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
5006 Points ∼98% +1%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
5000 Points ∼98% 0%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
5089 Points ∼100% +2%
Samsung Galaxy M20
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
3957 Points ∼78% -21%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
 
4978 Points ∼98% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (369 - 14189, n=640)
3022 Points ∼59% -39%
Overall (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy M30s
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2191 Points ∼86%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
2254 Points ∼88% +3%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2240 Points ∼88% +2%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2556 Points ∼100% +17%
Samsung Galaxy M20
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
1862 Points ∼73% -15%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
 
2191 Points ∼86% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 6097, n=640)
1515 Points ∼59% -31%
AnTuTu v8
UX (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy M30s
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
33717 Points ∼92%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
27535 Points ∼75% -18%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
27535 Points ∼75% -18%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
27705 Points ∼76% -18%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
 
33717 Points ∼92% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7553 - 78191, n=14)
36536 Points ∼100% +8%
MEM (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy M30s
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
44128 Points ∼96%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
38271 Points ∼83% -13%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
38271 Points ∼83% -13%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
37857 Points ∼83% -14%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
 
44128 Points ∼96% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (24176 - 92659, n=14)
45871 Points ∼100% +4%
GPU (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy M30s
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
34020 Points ∼46%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
33000 Points ∼44% -3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
33000 Points ∼44% -3%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
33527 Points ∼45% -1%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
 
34020 Points ∼46% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5938 - 199051, n=14)
74515 Points ∼100% +119%
CPU (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy M30s
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
63005 Points ∼74%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
70889 Points ∼84% +13%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
70889 Points ∼84% +13%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
70133 Points ∼83% +11%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
 
63005 Points ∼74% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (40810 - 145684, n=14)
84660 Points ∼100% +34%
Total Score (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy M30s
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
174870 Points ∼72%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
169695 Points ∼70% -3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
169695 Points ∼70% -3%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
169222 Points ∼70% -3%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
 
174870 Points ∼72% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (95354 - 501784, n=14)
241583 Points ∼100% +38%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (9.13 - 133, n=112)
36.1 Points ∼100% +26%
Xiaomi Mi A3 (Chrome 76)
30.692 Points ∼85% +7%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 (Chrome 78)
30.65 Points ∼85% +7%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus (Chrome 78)
30.531 Points ∼85% +6%
Samsung Galaxy M30s (Chrome 78)
28.73 Points ∼80%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
28.7 Points ∼80% 0%
Samsung Galaxy M20 (Samsung Brwoser 9.2)
22.57 Points ∼63% -21%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy M30s (Chrome 78)
51.922 Points ∼100%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
51.9 Points ∼100% 0%
Xiaomi Mi A3 (Chrome 76)
51.046 Points ∼98% -2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 (Chrome 78)
50.33 Points ∼97% -3%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus (Chrome 78)
49.754 Points ∼96% -4%
Samsung Galaxy M20 (Samsung Browser 9.2)
45.142 Points ∼87% -13%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 302, n=537)
42.2 Points ∼81% -19%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (6.42 - 157, n=100)
39.8 runs/min ∼100% +30%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 (Chrome 78)
30.8 runs/min ∼77% +1%
Samsung Galaxy M30s (Chrome 78)
30.5 runs/min ∼77%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus (Chrome 78)
30.5 runs/min ∼77% 0%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
30.5 runs/min ∼77% 0%
Xiaomi Mi A3 (Chome 76)
29.5 runs/min ∼74% -3%
Samsung Galaxy M20
19.3 runs/min ∼48% -37%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 184, n=170)
67.1 Points ∼100% +34%
Xiaomi Mi A3 (Chrome 76)
58 Points ∼86% +16%
Samsung Galaxy M20
52 Points ∼77% +4%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 (Chrome 78)
52 Points ∼77% +4%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus (Chrome 78)
51 Points ∼76% +2%
Samsung Galaxy M30s (Chrome 78)
50 Points ∼75%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
50 Points ∼75% 0%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy M30s (Chrome 78)
9684 Points ∼100%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
9684 Points ∼100% 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 (Chrome 78)
9405 Points ∼97% -3%
Xiaomi Mi A3 (Chrome 76)
9260 Points ∼96% -4%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus (Chrome 78)
9107 Points ∼94% -6%
Samsung Galaxy M20
9087 Points ∼94% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (894 - 49388, n=698)
6865 Points ∼71% -29%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (571 - 59466, n=723)
10475 ms * ∼100% -142%
Xiaomi Mi A3 (Chrome 76)
4583.8 ms * ∼44% -6%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 (Chrome 78)
4561.76 ms * ∼44% -5%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus (Chrome 78)
4504 ms * ∼43% -4%
Samsung Galaxy M30s (Chrome 78)
4332.2 ms * ∼41%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
4332 ms * ∼41% -0%
Samsung Galaxy M20
3703 ms * ∼35% +15%

* ... kleiner is beter

Samsung Galaxy M30sXiaomi Redmi Note 8Motorola Moto G8 PlusXiaomi Mi A3Samsung Galaxy M20Average 64 GB UFS 2.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-24%
-17%
-8%
-28%
-5%
-45%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
61.1 (Tohsiba Exceria Pro M501)
52.83 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-14%
52.2 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-15%
50.1 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-18%
65.29 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
7%
51.1 (17.1 - 71.9, n=28)
-16%
49.4 (1.7 - 87.1, n=435)
-19%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
74.19 (Tohsiba Exceria Pro M501)
71.63 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-3%
72.6 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-2%
67.8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-9%
81.48 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
10%
67.4 (18 - 86.6, n=28)
-9%
67.7 (8.1 - 96.5, n=435)
-9%
Random Write 4KB
137.1
91.23
-33%
124.9
-9%
117.4
-14%
44
-68%
60.1 (8.77 - 165, n=38)
-56%
22.6 (0.14 - 250, n=759)
-84%
Random Read 4KB
133.8
84.76
-37%
59.9
-55%
126.9
-5%
64
-52%
134 (78.2 - 173, n=38)
0%
48.1 (1.59 - 196, n=759)
-64%
Sequential Write 256KB
190.7
160.53
-16%
217.4
14%
184
-4%
137
-28%
199 (133 - 388, n=38)
4%
98.6 (2.99 - 590, n=759)
-48%
Sequential Read 256KB
483.6
297.65
-38%
302.5
-37%
502.2
4%
300
-38%
711 (484 - 895, n=38)
47%
277 (12.1 - 1504, n=759)
-43%
0102030405060Tooltip
; Arena of Valor; min; 1.31.1.5: Ø59.9 (58-60)
; Arena of Valor; high HD; 1.31.1.5: Ø59.8 (54-60)
; Asphalt 9: Legends; High Quality; 1.8.1a: Ø27.8 (22-31)
; Asphalt 9: Legends; Standard / low; 1.8.1a: Ø28 (18-30)
; Shadow Fight 3; high; 1.19.4: Ø57.3 (1-60)
; Shadow Fight 3; minimal; 1.19.4: Ø59.8 (59-60)
Max. Belasting
 36 °C29.9 °C28.6 °C 
 35 °C30.1 °C29.2 °C 
 32.5 °C29.1 °C28.5 °C 
Maximum: 36 °C
Gemiddelde: 31 °C
27.4 °C29.1 °C33.3 °C
27.8 °C29.2 °C33.9 °C
28.2 °C29.7 °C32.3 °C
Maximum: 33.9 °C
Gemiddelde: 30.1 °C
Stroomadapter (max.)  36.5 °C | Kamertemperatuur 21.4 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 31 °C / 88 F, compared to the average of 33.1 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 36 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 35.5 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 33.9 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.1 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 33.1 °C / 92 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs204346.42536.842.93132.833.74033.735.75040.1386331.333.58024.725.410025.624.912522.123.216019.927.420019.337.125017.244.331517.451.240017.156.850017.360.56301562.58001563.6100018.672.1125014.574.8160015.774.4200014.472.3250014.470.9315014.166.9400014.259.7500014.358.1630014.562.4800014.570.81000014.577.31250014.565.71600014.752.6SPL64.460.727.582.8N1612.9149.8median 15median 62.4Delta1.512.832.233.527.824.824.125.824.924.833.333.223.824.426.23326.227.117.429.617.239.717.339.816.444.216.250.815.755.314.661.316.364.113.468.613.870.714.371.313.869.714.370.514.671.513.775.514.57214.470.314.37014.672.514.673.314.569.714.859.826.783.30.855median 14.6median 69.71.410.2hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSamsung Galaxy M30sSamsung Galaxy M20
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Samsung Galaxy M30s audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.6% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 57% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 74% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 21% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Samsung Galaxy M20 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 31.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 12% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 81% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 39% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Stroomgebruik
Uit / Standbydarklight 0 / 0.2 Watt
Inactiefdarkmidlight 1 / 1.9 / 2.4 Watt
Belasting midlight 5 / 6.3 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Samsung Galaxy M30s
6000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
4000 mAh
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
4000 mAh
Xiaomi Mi A3
4030 mAh
Samsung Galaxy M20
5000 mAh
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
21%
-30%
-5%
5%
0%
12%
Idle Minimum *
1
0.62
38%
1.7
-70%
0.8
20%
0.94
6%
1
-0%
0.883 (0.2 - 3.4, n=787)
12%
Idle Average *
1.9
1.77
7%
2.3
-21%
2
-5%
2.37
-25%
1.9
-0%
1.74 (0.6 - 6.2, n=786)
8%
Idle Maximum *
2.4
1.8
25%
3.5
-46%
3.3
-38%
2.42
-1%
2.4
-0%
2.03 (0.74 - 6.6, n=787)
15%
Load Average *
5
3.42
32%
4.7
6%
4.1
18%
3.83
23%
5
-0%
4.07 (0.8 - 10.8, n=781)
19%
Load Maximum *
6.3
6.14
3%
7.5
-19%
7.7
-22%
5.07
20%
6.3
-0%
5.93 (1.2 - 14.2, n=781)
6%

* ... kleiner is beter

Batterijduur
Inactief (zonder WLAN, minimale helderheid)
36h 46min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
19h 14min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
21h 9min
Belast (maximale helderheid)
5h 36min
Samsung Galaxy M30s
6000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
4000 mAh
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
4000 mAh
Xiaomi Mi A3
4030 mAh
Samsung Galaxy M20
5000 mAh
Batterijduur
-25%
-14%
-17%
-15%
Reader / Idle
2206
2139
-3%
2002
-9%
1724
-22%
1904
-14%
H.264
1269
859
-32%
996
-22%
1023
-19%
1121
-12%
WiFi v1.3
1154
824
-29%
980
-15%
985
-15%
927.5
-20%
Load
336
217
-35%
302
-10%
297
-12%
288
-14%

Pro

+ toonaangevende batterijduur
+ stijlvol ontwerp
+ goed gebouwd
+ lage oppervlaktetemperaturen, zelfs onder belasting
+ snelle interne opslag
+ helder beeldscherm
+ precieze vingerafdruksensor
+ nauwkeurige GPS-module
+ snelle Wi-Fi

Contra

- verouderde updates van beveiligingspatches
- vooraf geïnstalleerde advertentie-apps
- teleurstellende mono luidspreker
- prestatiebeperking bij hoge belasting

Samenvatting - Degelijk en aan te bevelen

Getest: de Samsung Galaxy M30s smartphone.
Getest: de Samsung Galaxy M30s smartphone.

Voor het volledige, Engelse testrapport, klik hier.

De Samsung Galaxy M30s is een betaalbaar toestel met weinig compromissen. Ons testmodel heeft een uitstekende batterijlevensduur, snelle opslag, veel RAM en is robuust gebouwd ondanks de kunststof achterkant.

Het apparaat heeft ook relatief snelle Wi-Fi module en daarnaast maakt de nauwkeurigheid van de GPS-module indruk op ons. Evenzo is het 6,4-inch AMOLED-beeldscherm helder genoeg voor de meeste mensen, en weinigen zouden klachten moeten hebben over de nauwkeurigheid van het touchscreen of de vingerafdrukscanner.

De Galaxy M30s heeft echter enkele tekortkomingen. Ten eerste is Samsung de laatste tijd laks geweest bij het uitgeven van beveiligingspatchupdates. Op het moment van schrijven zit onze beoordeling vast op patches die drie maanden oud zijn, wat naar onze mening onaanvaardbaar is. Bovendien installeert Samsung reclame-apps van derden, wat een andere ergernis is. Ten tweede kan ons testmodel zijn prestatieniveau niet langdurig vasthouden, wat teleurstellend is. We hebben ook onze klachten over de audiokwaliteit van de mono luidspreker, de gesprekskwaliteit en de kracht van de stroomadapter, maar dit zijn minder belangrijke punten dan de SoC en software.

De Samsung Galaxy M30s heeft een fantastische batterijduur, goede camera's en een helder AMOLED-beeldscherm. Hoewel we enkele problemen met het apparaat hebben, verdient het nog steeds onze aanbeveling als je een budget hebt van ongeveer €250.

Over het algemeen biedt de Galaxy M30s veel waar voor je geld. Ons testmodel maakte op veel vlakken indruk op ons, terwijl onze problemen met het model een beperkte impact zouden moeten hebben in het dagelijks gebruik.

Samsung Galaxy M30s - 25-11-2019 v7
Florian Schmitt

Behuizing
77%
Toetsenbord
65 / 75 → 87%
Aanwijsapparaat
96%
Aansluitmogelijkheden
46 / 70 → 66%
Gewicht
89%
Batterij
92%
Beeldscherm
88%
Gaming-performance
15 / 64 → 23%
Applicatie-performance
59 / 86 → 69%
Temperatuur
94%
Luidheid
100%
Audio
69 / 90 → 76%
Camera
62%
Gemiddelde
73%
80%
Smartphone - Gewogen Gemiddelde

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Overzichten en testrapporten over laptops en mobieltjes > Testrapporten > Kort testrapport Samsung Galaxy M30s Smartphone: Een enorme batterij voor een betaalbare prijs
Florian Schmitt, 2019-12- 1 (Update: 2019-12- 1)