Notebookcheck

Kort testrapport Samsung Galaxy A90 5G Smartphone: Alles voor 5G

Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt (vertaald door Siemon Boes), 12-12-2019

Supersnel internet voor iedereen? De bedoeling van de Samsung Galaxy A90 5G is om 5G-smartphones goedkoper te maken. Met een adviesprijs van 749 euro is het echter geen koopje. In ons testrapport achterhalen we of de prijs gerechtvaardigd is.

Samsung Galaxy A90 5G
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
Grafische kaart
Geheugen
6144 MB 
Beeldscherm
6.7 inch 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixel 393 PPI, capacitief touchscreen, Super AMOLED, druppel-notch, glimmend: ja
Opslag
128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash, 128 GB 
, , 115 GB beschikbaar
Verbindingen
1 USB 3.0, Audio Verbindingen: USB Type-C, Card Reader: microSD tot 512GB, 1 Vingerafdruklezer, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensoren: accelerometer, gyroscoop, afstandssensor, kompas, USB-C
Netwerkmogelijkheden
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.0, 2G (850/​900/​1800/​1900), 3G (B1/​B2/​B4/​B5/​B8), 4G (B1/​B2/​B3/​B4/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B12/​B13/​B17/​B20/​B26/​B28/​B38/​B40/​B41/​B66), 5G (n78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Afmetingen
hoogte x breedte x diepte (in mm): 8.4 x 164.8 x 76.4
Batterij
4500 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Besturingssysteem
Android 9.0 Pie
Camera
Primary Camera: 48 MPix f/​2.0, fasedetectie-AF, LED-flash, Video @2160p/​30FPS, rotable (camera 1); 8.0MP, f/​2.2, groothoeklens (camera 2); 5.0MP, f/​2.2, scherptediepte (camera 3)
Secondary Camera: 32 MPix f/2.0
Bijkomende functionaliteiten
Luidsprekers: monoluidspreker aan de onderzijde, Toetsenbord: virtueel toetsenbord, snellader, USB type-C-kabel, koptelefoon, SIM-tool, 24 Maanden Garantie, SAR-waarde: 0,377W/​kg (hoofd), 1,547W/​kg (lichaam); Download LTE: tot 2 Gbit/s, Upload LTE: tot 316 Mbit/s; Download 5G: tot 5 Gbit/s , fanless
Gewicht
206 g, Voeding: 72 g
Prijs
749 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Concurrerende Toestellen

EvaluatieDatumModelGewichtDriveFormaatResolutieBest Price
84%12-2019Samsung Galaxy A90 5G
855, Adreno 640
206 g128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash6.7"2400x1080
87%09-2019Apple iPhone 11
A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU
194 g64 GB SSD6.1"1792x828
87%07-2019Samsung Galaxy A80
730, Adreno 618
220 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.7"2400x1080
87%11-2019OnePlus 7T Pro
855+, Adreno 640
206 g256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash6.67"3120x1440
86%12-2019Google Pixel 4
855, Adreno 640
162 g64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash5.7"2280x1080
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Apple iPhone 11
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD
563 (min: 490, max: 597) MBit/s ∼100% +10%
Google Pixel 4
Adreno 640, 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
526 (min: 413, max: 655) MBit/s ∼93% +3%
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G
Adreno 640, 855, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
513 (min: 457, max: 532) MBit/s ∼91%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Adreno 640, 855+, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
471 (min: 347, max: 505) MBit/s ∼84% -8%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Adreno 618, 730, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
428 (min: 360, max: 501) MBit/s ∼76% -17%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 1014, n=476)
235 MBit/s ∼42% -54%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Google Pixel 4
Adreno 640, 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
591 (min: 564, max: 609) MBit/s ∼100% +18%
Apple iPhone 11
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD
529 (min: 204, max: 603) MBit/s ∼90% +6%
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G
Adreno 640, 855, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
501 (min: 479, max: 554) MBit/s ∼85%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Adreno 640, 855+, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
352 (min: 311, max: 375) MBit/s ∼60% -30%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Adreno 618, 730, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
282 (min: 249, max: 327) MBit/s ∼48% -44%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 966, n=476)
222 MBit/s ∼38% -56%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø513 (457-532)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø501 (479-554)
GPS Garmin Edge 520 - overzicht
GPS Garmin Edge 520 - overzicht
GPS Garmin Edge 520 - bocht
GPS Garmin Edge 520 - bocht
GPS Garmin Edge 520 - brug
GPS Garmin Edge 520 - brug
GPS Samsung Galaxy A90 - overzicht
GPS Samsung Galaxy A90 - overzicht
GPS Samsung Galaxy A90 - bocht
GPS Samsung Galaxy A90 - bocht
GPS Samsung Galaxy A90 - brug
GPS Samsung Galaxy A90 - brug

Beeldvergelijking

Bekijk een scène en navigeer binnen het eerste beeld. Eén klik wijzigt het zoomniveau. Eén klik op het ingezoomde beeld opent het origineel in een nieuw venster. Het eerste beeld toont de verschaalde foto van het testtoestel.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
ColorChecker Photo
24.7 ∆E
39.8 ∆E
29.8 ∆E
28.7 ∆E
34.3 ∆E
47 ∆E
36.5 ∆E
23.2 ∆E
27.4 ∆E
23.1 ∆E
47.2 ∆E
47.4 ∆E
20 ∆E
34.8 ∆E
23 ∆E
45.4 ∆E
29.5 ∆E
32.9 ∆E
40.2 ∆E
43.2 ∆E
40.5 ∆E
30.7 ∆E
21.1 ∆E
11.8 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy A90 5G: 32.58 ∆E min: 11.76 - max: 47.41 ∆E
ColorChecker Photo
7.4 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
5 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
4.5 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
5.6 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
5.6 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
10 ∆E
2.4 ∆E
3 ∆E
11.8 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
1.9 ∆E
1.9 ∆E
1.4 ∆E
3.6 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy A90 5G: 5.59 ∆E min: 1.37 - max: 11.85 ∆E
Testbeeld - perfecte belichting
Testbeeld - perfecte belichting
Testbeeld - 1 Lux
573
cd/m²
581
cd/m²
601
cd/m²
566
cd/m²
581
cd/m²
595
cd/m²
567
cd/m²
574
cd/m²
590
cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 601 cd/m² Gemiddelde: 580.9 cd/m² Minimum: 1.88 cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling: 94 %
Helderheid in Batterij-modus: 581 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Zwart: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.44 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6
ΔE Greyscale 4 | 0.64-98 Ø6.2
117.1% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.118
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G
Super AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.7
Apple iPhone 11
IPS, 1792x828, 6.1
Samsung Galaxy A80
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.7
OnePlus 7T Pro
AMOLED, 3120x1440, 6.67
Google Pixel 4
OLED, 2280x1080, 5.7
Screen
45%
12%
26%
32%
Brightness middle
581
679
17%
478
-18%
606
4%
447
-23%
Brightness
581
671
15%
486
-16%
611
5%
439
-24%
Brightness Distribution
94
93
-1%
96
2%
95
1%
93
-1%
Black Level *
0.68
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
5.44
0.8
85%
2.97
45%
3.46
36%
0.8
85%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
13.05
2.4
82%
10.18
22%
5.64
57%
1.4
89%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
4
1.1
72%
2.5
37%
2
50%
1.3
67%
Gamma
2.118 104%
2.24 98%
2.031 108%
2.258 97%
2.22 99%
CCT
5882 111%
6610 98%
6533 99%
6779 96%
6213 105%
Contrast
999

* ... kleiner is beter

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Om de schermhelderheid te verlagen schakelen sommige laptops het backlight erg snel aan en uit. Dit gebeurt aan een dergelijk hoge frequentie dat het niet zichtbaar is voor het menselijk oog. Als de frequentie te laag is kunnen personen met gevoelige ogen geïrriteerd geraken, hoofdpijn krijgen en zelfs flickering waarnemen.
Screen flickering / PWM waargenomen 223 Hz

Het backlight van het scherm flikkert aan 223 Hz (hoogstwaarschijnlijk met PWM - Pulse-Width Modulation) .

De frequentie van 223 Hz is redelijk laag en de meeste mensen die gevoelig zijn aan flickering kunnen dit dus waarnemen of geïrriteerde ogen krijgen (gebruikmakend van de vermelde helderheid en lager).

Ter vergelijking: 51 % van alle geteste toestellen maakten geen gebruik van PWM om de schermhelderheid te verlagen. Als het wel werd gebruikt, werd een gemiddelde van 13573 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 2500000) Hz waargenomen.

Responstijd Scherm

De responstijden van het scherm tonen hoe snel het scherm in staat is om van één kleur naar de andere te veranderen. Trage responstijden kunnen aanleiding geven tot 'nabeelden' rond bewegende objecten of het scherm wazig maken (blur). Vooral spelers van snelle 3D-games hebben baat bij een scherm met snelle responstijden.
       Responstijd Zwart naar Wit
6 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd↗ 3 ms stijging
↘ 3 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde erg snelle responstijden in onze tests en zou zeer geschikt moeten zijn voor snelle games.
Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.8 (minimum) tot 240 (maximum) ms. » 4 % van alle toestellen zijn beter.
Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd beter is dan het gemiddelde (24.9 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.
       Responstijd 50% Grijs naar 80% Grijs
10 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd↗ 5 ms stijging
↘ 5 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde prima responstijden in onze tests maar is misschien wat te traag voor competitieve games.
Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.9 (minimum) tot 636 (maximum) ms. » 8 % van alle toestellen zijn beter.
Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd beter is dan het gemiddelde (39.5 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.
Geekbench 5
Vulkan Score (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
2154 Points ∼89%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
2430 Points ∼100% +13%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
2081 Points ∼86% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (1849 - 2154, n=7)
2032 Points ∼84% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (143 - 3222, n=39)
1359 Points ∼56% -37%
OpenCL Score (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
2369 Points ∼87%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
2716 Points ∼100% +15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (2218 - 2395, n=7)
2302 Points ∼85% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (183 - 4593, n=45)
1816 Points ∼67% -23%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
2733 Points ∼79%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
3463 Points ∼100% +27%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
2940 Points ∼85% +8%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
2494 Points ∼72% -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (2441 - 2852, n=8)
2616 Points ∼76% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (807 - 3575, n=57)
1894 Points ∼55% -31%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
740 Points ∼55%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
1343 Points ∼100% +81%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
792 Points ∼59% +7%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
725 Points ∼54% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (725 - 750, n=8)
742 Points ∼55% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (150 - 1344, n=57)
541 Points ∼40% -27%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
10251 Points ∼98%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
7177 Points ∼69% -30%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
10442 Points ∼100% +2%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
10254 Points ∼98% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (8342 - 11440, n=17)
9650 Points ∼92% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2630 - 11690, n=412)
5405 Points ∼52% -47%
Work performance score (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
12747 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
8626 Points ∼68% -32%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
12645 Points ∼99% -1%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
12190 Points ∼96% -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (10330 - 14439, n=17)
12152 Points ∼95% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1077 - 15193, n=576)
5872 Points ∼46% -54%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3308 Points ∼93%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
2708 Points ∼76% -18%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
3564 Points ∼100% +8%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3044 Points ∼85% -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (2104 - 3365, n=17)
3013 Points ∼85% -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1740 - 15735, n=86)
2660 Points ∼75% -20%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5703 Points ∼87%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
2160 Points ∼33% -62%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
6527 Points ∼100% +14%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5228 Points ∼80% -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (4236 - 5884, n=17)
5596 Points ∼86% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (203 - 14536, n=86)
2673 Points ∼41% -53%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4913 Points ∼89%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
2262 Points ∼41% -54%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
5509 Points ∼100% +12%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4509 Points ∼82% -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (3800 - 5012, n=17)
4688 Points ∼85% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (253 - 14786, n=86)
2453 Points ∼45% -50%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4576 Points ∼98%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
3219 Points ∼69% -30%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
3160 Points ∼67% -31%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
4683 Points ∼100% +2%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4112 Points ∼88% -10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (1934 - 4576, n=17)
3845 Points ∼82% -16%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 5576, n=420)
2008 Points ∼43% -56%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
6990 Points ∼86%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
8119 Points ∼100% +16%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
2438 Points ∼30% -65%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
8006 Points ∼99% +15%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
6383 Points ∼79% -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (5184 - 7115, n=17)
6772 Points ∼83% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (75 - 8374, n=420)
1810 Points ∼22% -74%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
6257 Points ∼90%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
6067 Points ∼88% -3%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
2568 Points ∼37% -59%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
6916 Points ∼100% +11%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5685 Points ∼82% -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (3969 - 6312, n=17)
5759 Points ∼83% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (93 - 6916, n=421)
1685 Points ∼24% -73%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4119 Points ∼89%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
3411 Points ∼74% -17%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
3025 Points ∼66% -27%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
4604 Points ∼100% +12%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4072 Points ∼88% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (2345 - 4703, n=16)
3824 Points ∼83% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 5133, n=448)
1915 Points ∼42% -54%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
10024 Points ∼56%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
17853 Points ∼100% +78%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
3635 Points ∼20% -64%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
11448 Points ∼64% +14%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9217 Points ∼52% -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (6358 - 10420, n=16)
9490 Points ∼53% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (70 - 20154, n=448)
2417 Points ∼14% -76%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7602 Points ∼83%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
9199 Points ∼100% +21%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
3479 Points ∼38% -54%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
8605 Points ∼94% +13%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7196 Points ∼78% -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (5268 - 8141, n=16)
7096 Points ∼77% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (88 - 10427, n=448)
2036 Points ∼22% -73%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4374 Points ∼97%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
2429 Points ∼54% -44%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
3215 Points ∼71% -26%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
4519 Points ∼100% +3%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4199 Points ∼93% -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (2705 - 4429, n=17)
3918 Points ∼87% -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (486 - 4909, n=500)
1914 Points ∼42% -56%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
6231 Points ∼88%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
5726 Points ∼81% -8%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
2244 Points ∼32% -64%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
7044 Points ∼100% +13%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
6214 Points ∼88% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (5663 - 6362, n=17)
6242 Points ∼89% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53 - 7150, n=500)
1504 Points ∼21% -76%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5694 Points ∼91%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
4400 Points ∼70% -23%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
2405 Points ∼38% -58%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
6266 Points ∼100% +10%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5615 Points ∼90% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (4556 - 5747, n=17)
5498 Points ∼88% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 6319, n=501)
1450 Points ∼23% -75%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4231 Points ∼93%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
3211 Points ∼71% -24%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
4503 Points ∼99% +6%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4540 Points ∼100% +7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (3001 - 4540, n=16)
3864 Points ∼85% -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (293 - 4900, n=540)
1777 Points ∼39% -58%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9703 Points ∼91%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
3478 Points ∼33% -64%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
10637 Points ∼100% +10%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
8765 Points ∼82% -10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (6122 - 10008, n=16)
9255 Points ∼87% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 11302, n=539)
1978 Points ∼19% -80%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7537 Points ∼92%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
3415 Points ∼42% -55%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
8165 Points ∼100% +8%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7263 Points ∼89% -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (5251 - 7820, n=16)
7039 Points ∼86% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 8338, n=542)
1711 Points ∼21% -77%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
39293 Points ∼100%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
33864 Points ∼86% -14%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
19389 Points ∼49% -51%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
30561 Points ∼78% -22%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
37641 Points ∼96% -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (20636 - 45072, n=16)
31794 Points ∼81% -19%
Average of class Smartphone
  (735 - 45072, n=700)
14390 Points ∼37% -63%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
105631 Points ∼50%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
209204 Points ∼100% +98%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
51091 Points ∼24% -52%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
118129 Points ∼56% +12%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
102168 Points ∼49% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (97354 - 110432, n=15)
105649 Points ∼51% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (536 - 209204, n=698)
22592 Points ∼11% -79%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
76813 Points ∼79%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
97276 Points ∼100% +27%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
37475 Points ∼39% -51%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
72173 Points ∼74% -6%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
73984 Points ∼76% -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (55771 - 83518, n=15)
68785 Points ∼71% -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (662 - 97276, n=698)
18254 Points ∼19% -76%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
118 fps ∼37%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
322 fps ∼100% +173%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
84 fps ∼26% -29%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
185 fps ∼57% +57%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
139 fps ∼43% +18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (85 - 167, n=18)
153 fps ∼48% +30%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.5 - 322, n=713)
38.7 fps ∼12% -67%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
60 fps ∼68%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
60 fps ∼68% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
59 fps ∼67% -2%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
60 fps ∼68% 0%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
88 fps ∼100% +47%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (59 - 91, n=18)
63.8 fps ∼73% +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 120, n=722)
28.5 fps ∼32% -52%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
88 fps ∼50%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
175 fps ∼100% +99%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
42 fps ∼24% -52%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
111 fps ∼63% +26%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
75 fps ∼43% -15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (50 - 102, n=18)
92.5 fps ∼53% +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.8 - 175, n=618)
22.4 fps ∼13% -75%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
60 fps ∼90%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
60 fps ∼90% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
36 fps ∼54% -40%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
57 fps ∼85% -5%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
67 fps ∼100% +12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (51 - 85, n=18)
60.3 fps ∼90% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 115, n=627)
19.7 fps ∼29% -67%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
69 fps ∼59%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
117 fps ∼100% +70%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
30 fps ∼26% -57%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
79 fps ∼68% +14%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
57 fps ∼49% -17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (35 - 71, n=18)
62.1 fps ∼53% -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.87 - 117, n=483)
18.2 fps ∼16% -74%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
57 fps ∼95%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
60 fps ∼100% +5%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
26 fps ∼43% -54%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
40 fps ∼67% -30%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
51 fps ∼85% -11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (36 - 58, n=18)
48.3 fps ∼81% -15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 110, n=485)
17.1 fps ∼29% -70%
GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
24 fps ∼40%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
60 fps ∼100% +150%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
10 fps ∼17% -58%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
17 fps ∼28% -29%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
24 fps ∼40% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (14 - 26, n=17)
21.7 fps ∼36% -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.61 - 60, n=210)
9.98 fps ∼17% -58%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
16 fps ∼48%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
33 fps ∼100% +106%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
6.8 fps ∼21% -57%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
19 fps ∼58% +19%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
13 fps ∼39% -19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (8.5 - 24, n=18)
16.5 fps ∼50% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.21 - 33, n=209)
6.9 fps ∼21% -57%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
37 fps ∼62%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
60 fps ∼100% +62%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
16 fps ∼27% -57%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
26 fps ∼43% -30%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
33 fps ∼55% -11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (22 - 38, n=17)
33.8 fps ∼56% -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 60, n=214)
14.7 fps ∼25% -60%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
41 fps ∼47%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
87 fps ∼100% +112%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
18 fps ∼21% -56%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
47 fps ∼54% +15%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
32 fps ∼37% -22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (22 - 43, n=18)
40.3 fps ∼46% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 87, n=214)
16.4 fps ∼19% -60%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
41 fps ∼56%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
73 fps ∼100% +78%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
17 fps ∼23% -59%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
48 fps ∼66% +17%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
34 fps ∼47% -17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (22 - 42, n=18)
39.4 fps ∼54% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 73, n=408)
12.4 fps ∼17% -70%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
36 fps ∼60%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
60 fps ∼100% +67%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
15 fps ∼25% -58%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
24 fps ∼40% -33%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
30 fps ∼50% -17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (21 - 41, n=18)
32.3 fps ∼54% -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.1 - 60, n=412)
11.1 fps ∼19% -69%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
1454 Points ∼91%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
1117 Points ∼70% -23%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
1236 Points ∼77% -15%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
1601 Points ∼100% +10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (1076 - 1601, n=17)
1344 Points ∼84% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7 - 1745, n=649)
767 Points ∼48% -47%
Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9264 Points ∼87%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
3855 Points ∼36% -58%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
10618 Points ∼100% +15%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9307 Points ∼88% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (8125 - 9510, n=17)
9197 Points ∼87% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (18 - 16996, n=649)
2126 Points ∼20% -77%
Memory (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4996 Points ∼77%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
3435 Points ∼53% -31%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
5091 Points ∼79% +2%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
6458 Points ∼100% +29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (2661 - 7500, n=17)
5010 Points ∼78% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (21 - 7500, n=649)
1570 Points ∼24% -69%
System (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
8670 Points ∼93%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
6484 Points ∼70% -25%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
9294 Points ∼100% +7%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
8058 Points ∼87% -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (5993 - 9143, n=17)
8548 Points ∼92% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (369 - 14189, n=649)
3060 Points ∼33% -65%
Overall (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4915 Points ∼93%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
3129 Points ∼59% -36%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
4992 Points ∼95% +2%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5277 Points ∼100% +7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (3847 - 5397, n=17)
4768 Points ∼90% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 6097, n=649)
1534 Points ∼29% -69%
AnTuTu v8
UX (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
69801 Points ∼89%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
78191 Points ∼100% +12%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
51228 Points ∼66% -27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (51228 - 72343, n=6)
62647 Points ∼80% -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (6969 - 82947, n=34)
43209 Points ∼55% -38%
MEM (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
71045 Points ∼100%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
64026 Points ∼90% -10%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
52596 Points ∼74% -26%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (52596 - 71045, n=6)
59887 Points ∼84% -16%
Average of class Smartphone
  (24176 - 100390, n=34)
49471 Points ∼70% -30%
GPU (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
166593 Points ∼84%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
199051 Points ∼100% +19%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
158097 Points ∼79% -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (158097 - 175532, n=6)
168202 Points ∼85% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5938 - 209164, n=34)
87479 Points ∼44% -47%
CPU (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
131120 Points ∼90%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
145386 Points ∼100% +11%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
114777 Points ∼79% -12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (114777 - 140166, n=6)
134137 Points ∼92% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (40620 - 168185, n=34)
92654 Points ∼64% -29%
Total Score (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
438559 Points ∼90%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
486654 Points ∼100% +11%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
376698 Points ∼77% -14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (376698 - 450074, n=6)
424873 Points ∼87% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (84645 - 534558, n=34)
272813 Points ∼56% -38%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0)
132.886 Points ∼100% +106%
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G (Chrome 78)
64.578 Points ∼49%
OnePlus 7T Pro (Chrome 78)
62.417 Points ∼47% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (45.5 - 67, n=15)
58.4 Points ∼44% -10%
Google Pixel 4 (Chrome 78)
56.678 Points ∼43% -12%
Samsung Galaxy A80 (Chrome 75)
40.021 Points ∼30% -38%
Average of class Smartphone (9.13 - 133, n=118)
36.3 Points ∼27% -44%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0)
293.36 Points ∼100% +158%
OnePlus 7T Pro (Chrome 78)
115.44 Points ∼39% +1%
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G (Chrome 78)
113.78 Points ∼39%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (90.8 - 120, n=15)
110 Points ∼37% -3%
Google Pixel 4 (Chrome 78)
107.51 Points ∼37% -6%
Samsung Galaxy A80 (Chrome 75)
77.376 Points ∼26% -32%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 302, n=546)
42.7 Points ∼15% -62%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0)
157 runs/min ∼100% +137%
OnePlus 7T Pro (Chome 78)
66.4 runs/min ∼42% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G (Chrome 78)
66.2 runs/min ∼42%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (42.5 - 67.9, n=14)
62 runs/min ∼39% -6%
Google Pixel 4 (Chrome 78)
61.8 runs/min ∼39% -7%
Average of class Smartphone (6.42 - 157, n=106)
40 runs/min ∼25% -40%
Samsung Galaxy A80 (Chome 75)
38.9 runs/min ∼25% -41%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0)
184 Points ∼100% +92%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (90 - 129, n=18)
106 Points ∼58% +10%
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G (Chrome 78)
96 Points ∼52%
Google Pixel 4 (Chrome 78)
94 Points ∼51% -2%
OnePlus 7T Pro (Chrome 78)
93 Points ∼51% -3%
Samsung Galaxy A80 (Chrome 75)
77 Points ∼42% -20%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 184, n=178)
67.5 Points ∼37% -30%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0)
48819 Points ∼100% +113%
OnePlus 7T Pro (Chrome 78)
23999 Points ∼49% +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (17011 - 25640, n=18)
23212 Points ∼48% +1%
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G (Chrome 78)
22936 Points ∼47%
Google Pixel 4 (Chrome 78)
22572 Points ∼46% -2%
Samsung Galaxy A80 (Chrome 75)
16358 Points ∼34% -29%
Average of class Smartphone (894 - 49388, n=707)
6952 Points ∼14% -70%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (571 - 59466, n=732)
10406 ms * ∼100% -386%
Samsung Galaxy A80 (Chrome 75)
3027 ms * ∼29% -41%
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G (Chrome 78)
2139.4 ms * ∼21%
OnePlus 7T Pro (Chrome 78)
2133.5 ms * ∼21% -0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (1852 - 2611, n=17)
2133 ms * ∼20% -0%
Google Pixel 4 (Chrome 78)
2072.2 ms * ∼20% +3%
Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0)
572.8 ms * ∼6% +73%

* ... kleiner is beter

Samsung Galaxy A90 5GSamsung Galaxy A80OnePlus 7T ProGoogle Pixel 4Average 128 GB UFS 3.0 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-64%
-28%
-39%
-9%
-58%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
59.4 (Tohsiba Exceria Pro M501)
56.9 (54.5 - 59.4, n=2)
-4%
49.8 (1.7 - 87.1, n=449)
-16%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
75.1 (Tohsiba Exceria Pro M501)
72.8 (70.5 - 75.1, n=2)
-3%
68 (8.1 - 96.5, n=449)
-9%
Random Write 4KB
168.5
21.6
-87%
26
-85%
146.64
-13%
123 (29.9 - 170, n=3)
-27%
24 (0.14 - 259, n=776)
-86%
Random Read 4KB
190.5
117.5
-38%
169
-11%
122.38
-36%
184 (170 - 192, n=3)
-3%
49.3 (1.59 - 226, n=776)
-74%
Sequential Write 256KB
522.3
190.4
-64%
405
-22%
247.73
-53%
421 (218 - 522, n=3)
-19%
101 (2.99 - 590, n=776)
-81%
Sequential Read 256KB
1418.4
501.5
-65%
1489
5%
655.4
-54%
1413 (1406 - 1418, n=3)
0%
283 (12.1 - 1781, n=776)
-80%
0102030405060Tooltip
; Arena of Valor; min; 1.32.1.2: Ø59.7 (49-60)
; Arena of Valor; high HD; 1.32.1.2: Ø59.8 (57-60)
; Shadow Fight 3; high; 1.19.4: Ø59.7 (58-60)
; Shadow Fight 3; minimal; 1.19.4: Ø59.6 (50-60)
Max. Belasting
 44.5 °C40.3 °C37.5 °C 
 44.7 °C40 °C37.3 °C 
 43.6 °C40.1 °C37.3 °C 
Maximum: 44.7 °C
Gemiddelde: 40.6 °C
33 °C37.6 °C39.7 °C
34.2 °C38.2 °C40.5 °C
35.1 °C38.5 °C40.1 °C
Maximum: 40.5 °C
Gemiddelde: 37.4 °C
Stroomadapter (max.)  43.5 °C | Kamertemperatuur 20.7 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 40.6 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 33 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.7 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 35.5 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.5 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.7 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 33 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs204351.22536.842.33132.833.94033.734.85040.136.26331.330.48024.725.810025.624.412522.124.516019.924.520019.333.525017.241.931517.448.240017.150.850017.352.96301556.78001560.4100018.666.3125014.570.2160015.769.9200014.470.1250014.469.6315014.170400014.268.2500014.359.9630014.566.2800014.5681000014.566.61250014.559.21600014.741.9SPL62.464.460.727.579.8N15.51612.9142.9median 15median 59.9Delta1.513.143.948.443.64238.338.638.342.441.245.934.139.82730.128.629.627.929.226.132.225.141.72249.420.557.420.561.820.664.418.666.718.170.718.575.117.972.318.674.817.873.817.573.516.970.616.863.51768.81778.117.273.417.166.817.154.917.360.965.174.766.430.384.719.134.418.71.460.5median 18.1median 66.72.711.3hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSamsung Galaxy A90 5GSamsung Galaxy A80
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.1% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (27.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 71% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 19% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 82% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 13% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Samsung Galaxy A80 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.1% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 36% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 54% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 60% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Stroomgebruik
Uit / Standbydarklight 0 / 0.2 Watt
Inactiefdarkmidlight 0.6 / 0.9 / 1.4 Watt
Belasting midlight 4.5 / 9 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G
4500 mAh
Apple iPhone 11
3110 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A80
3700 mAh
OnePlus 7T Pro
4085 mAh
Google Pixel 4
2800 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-59%
-5%
-129%
-34%
-33%
-28%
Idle Minimum *
0.6
0.56
7%
0.6
-0%
2.1
-250%
1.01
-68%
0.967 (0.6 - 1.96, n=17)
-61%
0.881 (0.2 - 3.4, n=800)
-47%
Idle Average *
0.9
2.99
-232%
1.2
-33%
3
-233%
1.63
-81%
1.519 (0.85 - 2.8, n=17)
-69%
1.741 (0.6 - 6.2, n=799)
-93%
Idle Maximum *
1.4
3.02
-116%
1.4
-0%
3.5
-150%
1.69
-21%
1.841 (1 - 2.9, n=17)
-32%
2.03 (0.74 - 6.6, n=800)
-45%
Load Average *
4.5
4.17
7%
5
-11%
5.3
-18%
4.67
-4%
4.6 (3.64 - 5.8, n=17)
-2%
4.07 (0.8 - 10.8, n=794)
10%
Load Maximum *
9
5.44
40%
7.1
21%
8.3
8%
8.78
2%
9.1 (7.49 - 11.9, n=17)
-1%
5.94 (1.2 - 14.2, n=794)
34%

* ... kleiner is beter

Batterijduur
Inactief (zonder WLAN, minimale helderheid)
35h 56min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
15h 46min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
16h 27min
Belast (maximale helderheid)
4h 58min
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G
4500 mAh
Apple iPhone 11
3110 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A80
3700 mAh
OnePlus 7T Pro
4085 mAh
Google Pixel 4
2800 mAh
Batterijduur
7%
-21%
-5%
-45%
Reader / Idle
2156
2765
28%
1796
-17%
2015
-7%
1007
-53%
H.264
987
1147
16%
902
-9%
957
-3%
617
-37%
WiFi v1.3
946
866
-8%
713
-25%
912
-4%
460
-51%
Load
298
267
-10%
200
-33%
283
-5%
185
-38%

Pro

+ relatief goedkope 5G-smartphone
+ nauwkeurige GPS
+ snelle opslag
+ microSD-kaartlezer
+ helder scherm
+ prima prestaties
+ lange batterijduur

Contra

- geen Wi-Fi 6
- matige luidspreker
- scherm zonder HDR
- aanzienlijke warmteontwikkeling onder belasting en throttling
- matige spraakkwaliteit
- camera zonder OIS of variabele zoom

Conclusie - Goede smartphone voor 5G-fanaten

Getest: Samsung Galaxy A90 5G. Testtoestel voorzien door Samsung Germany
Getest: Samsung Galaxy A90 5G. Testtoestel voorzien door Samsung Germany

Dit is de verkorte versie van het originele artikel. Het volledige, Engelse testrapport vind je hier.

Gebruikers die 5G willen voor een goede prijs, moeten hiervoor een aantal features opgeven. Dit lijkt het belangrijkste inzicht te zijn van ons testrapport van de Samsung Galaxy A90 5G. Aan de andere kant biedt het toestel ook voordelen ten opzichte van andere high-end smartphones, waaronder zijn bijzonder lange batterijduur, al konden we nog niet testen wat de impact van de 5G-module en microSD-kaartlezer hierop is. 

De waarde van de Samsung A90 5G hang dus sterk af van de algemene voorkeuren van een gebruiker: de camera, luidsprekers, geheugenconfiguratie en de prestaties zijn stuk voor stuk redelijk matig voor deze prijsklasse. Daarnaast ontbreken details zoals HDR, IP-certificatie en draadloos opladen, wat sommige gebruikers jammer zullen vinden.

De Samsung Galaxy A90 5G is een degelijke 5G-smartphone met een ietwat ingeperkte feature-set.

De Galaxy A90 5G is een van de goedkoopste manieren om de voordelen van 5G-netwerken te benutten - afgezien van Chinese importproducten. Aangezien de smartphone over het algemeen een prima indruk maakte en zelfs enkele unieke voordelen biedt, kunnen we hem zeker aanbevelen aan prijsbewuste 5G-fanaten.

Samsung Galaxy A90 5G - 09-12-2019 v7
Florian Schmitt

Behuizing
79%
Toetsenbord
65 / 75 → 87%
Aanwijsapparaat
96%
Aansluitmogelijkheden
48 / 70 → 69%
Gewicht
88%
Batterij
91%
Beeldscherm
83%
Gaming-performance
57 / 64 → 89%
Applicatie-performance
79 / 86 → 91%
Temperatuur
87%
Luidheid
100%
Audio
66 / 90 → 73%
Camera
69%
Gemiddelde
77%
84%
Smartphone - Gewogen Gemiddelde

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Overzichten en testrapporten over laptops en mobieltjes > Testrapporten > Kort testrapport Samsung Galaxy A90 5G Smartphone: Alles voor 5G
Florian Schmitt, 2019-12-12 (Update: 2019-12-12)