Notebookcheck

Kort testrapport Lenovo ThinkPad P53: klassiek werkstation met veel GPU prestaties

Andreas Osthoff, 👁 Andreas Osthoff, 13-11-2019

Is een Quadro RTX 5000 te veel? Lenovo biedt de nieuwe ThinkPad P53 nu aan met de high-end NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 GPU, die normaliter enkel te vinden is in grotere notebooks. Het koelsysteem van het werkstation bereikt hiermee zijn grenzen, wat een negatieve impact heeft op de CPU prestaties.

Lenovo ThinkPad P53-20QN000YGE (ThinkPad P53 Serie)
Processor
Intel Core i7-9850H
Grafische kaart
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop) - 16384 MB, Core: 1645 MHz, Geheugen: 1500 MHz, GDDR5, 431.13
Geheugen
32768 MB 
, DDR4-2666, 2/4 sloten vrij, max. 128 GB
Beeldscherm
15.6 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, N156HCE-GN1, IPS, glimmend: nee
Moederbord
Intel CM246
Opslag
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR, 1024 GB 
, , 903 GB beschikbaar
Geluidskaart
Intel Cannon Lake-H/S - cAVS (Audio, Voice, Speech)
Verbindingen
3 USB 3.0, 2 USB 3.1 Gen2, 2 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 3 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, 1 Docking Station Port, Audio Verbindingen: 3.5 mm stereo, Card Reader: 4-in-1 SD UHS-II, 1 SmartCard, 1 Vingerafdruklezer
Netwerkmogelijkheden
Intel Ethernet Connection I219-LM (10/100/1000/2500/5000MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5.0
Afmetingen
hoogte x breedte x diepte (in mm): 29.4 x 377.4 x 252.3
Batterij
90 Wh, 8000 mAh Lithium-Ion
Besturingssysteem
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: 720p
Bijkomende functionaliteiten
Luidsprekers: Stereo 2x 2 Watt, Toetsenbord: Chiclet, Toetsenbordverlichting: ja, 230-watt stroomadapter, 36 Maanden Garantie
Gewicht
2.688 kg, Voeding: 900 g
Prijs
4100 Euro
Links
Lenovo startpagina
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

EvaluatieDatumModelGewichtHoogteFormaatResolutieBest Price
90%11-2019Lenovo ThinkPad P53-20QN000YGE
9850H, Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop)		2.7 kg29.4 mm15.6"1920x1080
88%08-2019Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE
9850H, Quadro T1000 (Laptop)		1.7 kg18.4 mm15.6"1920x1080
87%11-2018Dell Precision 7530
8950HK, Quadro P3200		2.6 kg29.95 mm15.6"3840x2160
86%Fujitsu Celsius H780
8850H, Quadro P2000		2.8 kg31.9 mm15.6"1920x1080
85%06-2019MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657
9880H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q		1.9 kg18 mm15.6"3840x2160
Left: HDMI 2.0, 2x USB type-A 3.1 Gen 1, 4-in-1 SD card reader, SmartCard reader
Left: HDMI 2.0, 2x USB type-A 3.1 Gen 1, 4-in-1 SD card reader, SmartCard reader
Right: 3.5 mm audio, USB type-C 3.1 Gen 1 (Power Delivery & DisplayPort), nano-SIM tray, Kensington lock port
Right: 3.5 mm audio, USB type-C 3.1 Gen 1 (Power Delivery & DisplayPort), nano-SIM tray, Kensington lock port
Back: RJ45-LAN, 2x Thunderbolt 3 (USB type-C 3.1 Gen 2 with power delivery & DisplayPort), SlimTip AC adapter
Back: RJ45-LAN, 2x Thunderbolt 3 (USB type-C 3.1 Gen 2 with power delivery & DisplayPort), SlimTip AC adapter
SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Dell Precision 7530
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
193.2 MB/s ∼100% +4%
Lenovo ThinkPad P53-20QN000YGE
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
185 MB/s ∼96%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
181 MB/s ∼94% -2%
Lenovo ThinkPad P52 20MAS03N00
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
169 MB/s ∼87% -9%
Fujitsu Celsius H780
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
146 MB/s ∼76% -21%
Average of class Workstation
  (17.2 - 213, n=65)
137 MB/s ∼71% -26%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Lenovo ThinkPad P53-20QN000YGE
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
202.4 MB/s ∼100%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
198.2 MB/s ∼98% -2%
Dell Precision 7530
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
194.64 MB/s ∼96% -4%
Lenovo ThinkPad P52 20MAS03N00
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
189.2 MB/s ∼93% -7%
Fujitsu Celsius H780
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
174.4 MB/s ∼86% -14%
Average of class Workstation
  (18.4 - 255, n=64)
171 MB/s ∼84% -16%
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Lenovo ThinkPad P53-20QN000YGE
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1485 (min: 1319, max: 1589) MBit/s ∼100%
Lenovo ThinkPad P53-20QN000YGE
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
622 MBit/s ∼42% -58%
Average of class Workstation
  (292 - 1557, n=53)
659 MBit/s ∼44% -56%
Dell Precision 7530
Intel Wireless-AC 9260
636 MBit/s ∼43% -57%
Fujitsu Celsius H780
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
636 (min: 613, max: 655) MBit/s ∼43% -57%
Lenovo ThinkPad P52 20MAS03N00
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
629 MBit/s ∼42% -58%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
625 MBit/s ∼42% -58%
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657
Intel Cannon Lake-H/S CNVi: WiFi
490 (min: 376, max: 596) MBit/s ∼33% -67%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Lenovo ThinkPad P53-20QN000YGE
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1470 (min: 1418, max: 1509) MBit/s ∼100%
Lenovo ThinkPad P53-20QN000YGE
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
675 MBit/s ∼46% -54%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
706 MBit/s ∼48% -52%
Dell Precision 7530
Intel Wireless-AC 9260
681 MBit/s ∼46% -54%
Lenovo ThinkPad P52 20MAS03N00
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
662 MBit/s ∼45% -55%
Fujitsu Celsius H780
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
659 (min: 649, max: 666) MBit/s ∼45% -55%
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657
Intel Cannon Lake-H/S CNVi: WiFi
650 (min: 629, max: 713) MBit/s ∼44% -56%
Average of class Workstation
  (83 - 1642, n=53)
600 MBit/s ∼41% -59%
460
cd/m²		456
cd/m²		457
cd/m²
466
cd/m²		510
cd/m²		477
cd/m²
457
cd/m²		469
cd/m²		464
cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling
N156HCE-GN1
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 510 cd/m² Gemiddelde: 468.4 cd/m² Minimum: 7.8 cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling: 89 %
Helderheid in Batterij-modus: 490 cd/m²
Contrast: 1417:1 (Zwart: 0.36 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.3 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6, calibrated: 1.2
ΔE Greyscale 3.2 | 0.64-98 Ø6.2
93.1% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 59.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.34
Lenovo ThinkPad P53-20QN000YGE
N156HCE-GN1, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6		Lenovo ThinkPad P52 20MAS03N00
N156HCE-EN1, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 15.6		Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE
N156HCE-GN1, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 15.6		Dell Precision 7530
Sharp LQ156D1, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6		Fujitsu Celsius H780
LP156WF6-SPP1, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 15.6		MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657
AU Optronics AUO41EB, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6
Response Times
-3%
18%
-32%
-8%
-28%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
38.4 (18.8, 19.6)
39.2 (21.2, 18)
-2%
34.4 (17.2, 17.2)
10%
35.2 (17.2, 18)
8%
38 (18.8, 19.2)
1%
51 (24, 27)
-33%
Response Time Black / White *
25.2 (15.2, 10)
26 (14.4, 11.6)
-3%
14 (4.4, 9.6)
44%
26.4 (14, 12.4)
-5%
26.8 (16.4, 10.4)
-6%
31 (18, 13)
-23%
PWM Frequency
26040 (77)
25250 (50)
-3%
26040 (70)
0%
198.4 (25)
-99%
20830 (60)
-20%
Screen
-34%
-15%
-31%
-36%
-23%
Brightness middle
510
304
-40%
542
6%
292.8
-43%
271
-47%
445
-13%
Brightness
468
293
-37%
528
13%
295
-37%
260
-44%
462
-1%
Brightness Distribution
89
88
-1%
84
-6%
85
-4%
86
-3%
83
-7%
Black Level *
0.36
0.26
28%
0.41
-14%
0.36
-0%
0.29
19%
0.5
-39%
Contrast
1417
1169
-18%
1322
-7%
813
-43%
934
-34%
890
-37%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
2.3
4.5
-96%
3.5
-52%
3.48
-51%
3.9
-70%
4.75
-107%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
5.5
7.7
-40%
7.8
-42%
6.81
-24%
10.2
-85%
7.79
-42%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
1.2
2.4
-100%
1.3
-8%
3.13
-161%
2.9
-142%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
3.2
5.2
-63%
4.8
-50%
4.1
-28%
2.6
19%
4.49
-40%
Gamma
2.34 94%
2.26 97%
2.33 94%
2.2 100%
2.29 96%
2.49 88%
CCT
7036 92%
6789 96%
7690 85%
6740 96%
6517 100%
7374 88%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
59.4
53.8
-9%
58.8
-1%
84.4
42%
56.1
-6%
87
46%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
93.1
90.1
-3%
91.1
-2%
99.6
7%
85.8
-8%
100
7%
Totaal Gemiddelde (Programma / Instellingen)
-19% / -28%
2% / -8%
-32% / -31%
-22% / -30%
-26% / -24%

* ... kleiner is beter

Responstijd Scherm

ℹ
De responstijden van het scherm tonen hoe snel het scherm in staat is om van één kleur naar de andere te veranderen. Trage responstijden kunnen aanleiding geven tot 'nabeelden' rond bewegende objecten of het scherm wazig maken (blur). Vooral spelers van snelle 3D-games hebben baat bij een scherm met snelle responstijden.
   ↔    Responstijd Zwart naar Wit
25.2 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd↗ 15.2 ms stijging
↘ 10 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde relatief trage responstijden in onze tests en is misschien te traag voor games.
Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.8 (minimum) tot 240 (maximum) ms. » 44 % van alle toestellen zijn beter.
Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd vergelijkbaar is met het gemiddelde (24.9 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.
   ↔    Responstijd 50% Grijs naar 80% Grijs
38.4 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd↗ 18.8 ms stijging
↘ 19.6 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde trage responstijden in onze tests en is misschien te traag voor games.
Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.9 (minimum) tot 636 (maximum) ms. » 40 % van alle toestellen zijn beter.
Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd vergelijkbaar is met het gemiddelde (39.5 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
Om de schermhelderheid te verlagen schakelen sommige laptops het backlight erg snel aan en uit. Dit gebeurt aan een dergelijk hoge frequentie dat het niet zichtbaar is voor het menselijk oog. Als de frequentie te laag is kunnen personen met gevoelige ogen geïrriteerd geraken, hoofdpijn krijgen en zelfs flickering waarnemen.
Screen flickering / PWM waargenomen 26040 Hz ≤ 77 % helderheid instelling

Het backlight van het scherm flikkert aan 26040 Hz (hoogstwaarschijnlijk met PWM - Pulse-Width Modulation) aan een helderheid van 77 % en lager. Boven deze helderheid zou er geen flickering / PWM mogen optreden.

De frequentie van 26040 Hz is redelijk hoog en de meeste mensen die gevoelig zijn aan flickering zouden dit dus niet mogen waarnemen of geïrriteerde ogen krijgen.

Ter vergelijking: 51 % van alle geteste toestellen maakten geen gebruik van PWM om de schermhelderheid te verlagen. Als het wel werd gebruikt, werd een gemiddelde van 13573 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 2500000) Hz waargenomen.

 
01020304050607080901001101201301401501601701801902002102202302402502602702802903003103203303403503603703803904004104204304404504604704804905005105205305405505605705805906006106206306406506606706806907007107207307407507607707807908008108208308408508608708808909009109209309409509609709809901000101010201030104010501060107010801090110011101120113011401150116011701180119012001210122012301240Tooltip
Lenovo ThinkPad P53-20QN000YGE Intel Core i7-9850H, Intel Core i7-9850H: Ø1114 (1097.03-1230.35)
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE Intel Core i7-9850H, Intel Core i7-9850H: Ø961 (896-1114)
Lenovo ThinkPad P52 20MAS03N00 Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø1034 (1019-1128)
Dell Precision 7530 Intel Core i9-8950HK, Intel Core i9-8950HK: Ø1123 (1110.46-1192.57)
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Lenovo ThinkPad P53-20QN000YGE
Intel Core i7-9850H
196.53 Points ∼100%
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657
Intel Core i9-9880H
196 Points ∼100% 0%
Average Intel Core i7-9850H
  (192 - 197, n=3)
194 Points ∼99% -1%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE
Intel Core i7-9850H
193 Points ∼98% -2%
Dell Precision 7530
Intel Core i9-8950HK
187 Points ∼95% -5%
Fujitsu Celsius H780
Intel Core i7-8850H
185 Points ∼94% -6%
Lenovo ThinkPad P52 20MAS03N00
Intel Core i7-8750H
175 Points ∼89% -11%
Average of class Workstation
  (117 - 214, n=101)
160 Points ∼81% -19%
CPU Multi 64Bit
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657
Intel Core i9-9880H
1545 Points ∼100% +39%
Lenovo ThinkPad P52 20MAS03N00
Intel Core i7-8750H
1217 Points ∼79% +10%
Dell Precision 7530
Intel Core i9-8950HK
1166 Points ∼75% +5%
Fujitsu Celsius H780
Intel Core i7-8850H
1116 Points ∼72% +1%
Average Intel Core i7-9850H
  (961 - 1272, n=3)
1114 Points ∼72% 0%
Lenovo ThinkPad P53-20QN000YGE
Intel Core i7-9850H
1108.8 (min: 1097.03, max: 1230.35) Points ∼72%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE
Intel Core i7-9850H
961 (min: 896, max: 1114) Points ∼62% -13%
Average of class Workstation
  (260 - 1623, n=104)
774 Points ∼50% -30%
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
6830
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
130.9 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
196.53 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1108.8 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
198.56 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.62 %
Help
PCMark 10
Digital Content Creation
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9880H, 2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ (RAID 0)
7161 Points ∼100% +2%
Lenovo ThinkPad P53-20QN000YGE
Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop), 9850H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
7033 Points ∼98%
Dell Precision 7530
Quadro P3200, 8950HK, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
6907 Points ∼96% -2%
Fujitsu Celsius H780
Quadro P2000, 8850H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
5880 Points ∼82% -16%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE
Quadro T1000 (Laptop), 9850H, WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G
5033 Points ∼70% -28%
Lenovo ThinkPad P52 20MAS03N00
Quadro P1000, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
4348 Points ∼61% -38%
Productivity
Dell Precision 7530
Quadro P3200, 8950HK, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
7994 Points ∼100% +4%
Lenovo ThinkPad P53-20QN000YGE
Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop), 9850H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
7657 Points ∼96%
Fujitsu Celsius H780
Quadro P2000, 8850H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
7377 Points ∼92% -4%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE
Quadro T1000 (Laptop), 9850H, WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G
7243 Points ∼91% -5%
Lenovo ThinkPad P52 20MAS03N00
Quadro P1000, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
6649 Points ∼83% -13%
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9880H, 2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ (RAID 0)
5986 Points ∼75% -22%
Essentials
Lenovo ThinkPad P53-20QN000YGE
Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop), 9850H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
9603 Points ∼100%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE
Quadro T1000 (Laptop), 9850H, WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G
9566 Points ∼100% 0%
Dell Precision 7530
Quadro P3200, 8950HK, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
9288 Points ∼97% -3%
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9880H, 2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ (RAID 0)
8961 Points ∼93% -7%
Fujitsu Celsius H780
Quadro P2000, 8850H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
8632 Points ∼90% -10%
Lenovo ThinkPad P52 20MAS03N00
Quadro P1000, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
8298 Points ∼86% -14%
Score
Lenovo ThinkPad P53-20QN000YGE
Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop), 9850H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
5754 Points ∼100%
Dell Precision 7530
Quadro P3200, 8950HK, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
5738 Points ∼100% 0%
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9880H, 2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ (RAID 0)
5211 Points ∼91% -9%
Fujitsu Celsius H780
Quadro P2000, 8850H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
5167 Points ∼90% -10%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE
Quadro T1000 (Laptop), 9850H, WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G
5046 Points ∼88% -12%
Lenovo ThinkPad P52 20MAS03N00
Quadro P1000, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
4428 Points ∼77% -23%
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
AS SSD
hddimg
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3538.8 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 2935.6 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 580.78 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 475.17 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 1503.44 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 1402.1 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 48.3 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 146.96 MB/s
3DMark 11 | 3DMark | SPECviewperf 13 | LuxMark v2.0 64Bit
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop)
  (24156 - 24620, n=3)
24383 Points ∼100% +1%
Lenovo ThinkPad P53-20QN000YGE
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H
24156 Points ∼99%
MSI WS75 9TL-636
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H
23739 Points ∼97% -2%
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-9880H
20837 Points ∼85% -14%
Dell Precision 7530
NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i9-8950HK
14673 Points ∼60% -39%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H
10407 Points ∼43% -57%
Fujitsu Celsius H780
NVIDIA Quadro P2000, Intel Core i7-8850H
8573 Points ∼35% -65%
Average of class Workstation
  (841 - 26465, n=114)
6818 Points ∼28% -72%
Lenovo ThinkPad P52 20MAS03N00
NVIDIA Quadro P1000, Intel Core i7-8750H
6115 Points ∼25% -75%
3DMark
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Lenovo ThinkPad P53-20QN000YGE
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H
6999 Points ∼100%
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop)
 
6999 Points ∼100% 0%
MSI WS75 9TL-636
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H
6851 Points ∼98% -2%
Dell Precision 7530
NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i9-8950HK
3732 Points ∼53% -47%
Average of class Workstation
  (566 - 7734, n=34)
3317 Points ∼47% -53%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H
2834 Points ∼40% -60%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Lenovo ThinkPad P53-20QN000YGE
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H
18247 Points ∼100%
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop)
 
18247 Points ∼100% 0%
MSI WS75 9TL-636
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H
17619 Points ∼97% -3%
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-9880H
16100 Points ∼88% -12%
Dell Precision 7530
NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i9-8950HK
11316 Points ∼62% -38%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H
7558 Points ∼41% -59%
Fujitsu Celsius H780
NVIDIA Quadro P2000, Intel Core i7-8850H
6953 Points ∼38% -62%
Average of class Workstation
  (752 - 20913, n=106)
5585 Points ∼31% -69%
Lenovo ThinkPad P52 20MAS03N00
NVIDIA Quadro P1000, Intel Core i7-8750H
4843 Points ∼27% -73%
SPECviewperf 13
Solidworks (sw-04)
Lenovo ThinkPad P53-20QN000YGE
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H
129.58 fps ∼100%
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop)
  (122 - 132, n=3)
128 fps ∼99% -1%
MSI WS75 9TL-636
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H
125.44 fps ∼97% -3%
Average of class Workstation
  (37.3 - 189, n=25)
99.6 fps ∼77% -23%
Fujitsu Celsius H780
NVIDIA Quadro P2000, Intel Core i7-8850H
96.07 fps ∼74% -26%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H
89.18 fps ∼69% -31%
Lenovo ThinkPad P52 20MAS03N00
NVIDIA Quadro P1000, Intel Core i7-8750H
84.24 fps ∼65% -35%
Siemens NX (snx-03)
Lenovo ThinkPad P53-20QN000YGE
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H
286.67 fps ∼100%
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop)
  (268 - 287, n=3)
275 fps ∼96% -4%
MSI WS75 9TL-636
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H
271.14 fps ∼95% -5%
Average of class Workstation
  (36.4 - 396, n=25)
174 fps ∼61% -39%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H
127.83 fps ∼45% -55%
Fujitsu Celsius H780
NVIDIA Quadro P2000, Intel Core i7-8850H
121.86 fps ∼43% -57%
Lenovo ThinkPad P52 20MAS03N00
NVIDIA Quadro P1000, Intel Core i7-8750H
103.7 fps ∼36% -64%
Showcase (showcase-02)
MSI WS75 9TL-636
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H
94.04 fps ∼100% +1%
Lenovo ThinkPad P53-20QN000YGE
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H
93.44 fps ∼99%
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop)
  (92.4 - 94, n=3)
93.3 fps ∼99% 0%
Average of class Workstation
  (12.6 - 97.3, n=25)
49.3 fps ∼52% -47%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H
35.27 fps ∼38% -62%
Fujitsu Celsius H780
NVIDIA Quadro P2000, Intel Core i7-8850H
30.26 fps ∼32% -68%
Lenovo ThinkPad P52 20MAS03N00
NVIDIA Quadro P1000, Intel Core i7-8750H
27.56 fps ∼29% -71%
Medical (medical-02)
Lenovo ThinkPad P53-20QN000YGE
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H
79.03 fps ∼100%
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop)
 
79 fps ∼100% 0%
MSI WS75 9TL-636
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H
73.2 fps ∼93% -7%
Average of class Workstation
  (6.8 - 81.3, n=25)
35.7 fps ∼45% -55%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H
33.45 fps ∼42% -58%
Fujitsu Celsius H780
NVIDIA Quadro P2000, Intel Core i7-8850H
18.47 fps ∼23% -77%
Lenovo ThinkPad P52 20MAS03N00
NVIDIA Quadro P1000, Intel Core i7-8750H
11.93 fps ∼15% -85%
Maya (maya-05)
MSI WS75 9TL-636
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H
207.89 fps ∼100% +2%
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop)
  (205 - 210, n=3)
207 fps ∼100% +1%
Lenovo ThinkPad P53-20QN000YGE
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H
204.8 fps ∼99%
Average of class Workstation
  (29.4 - 255, n=25)
126 fps ∼61% -38%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H
101.04 fps ∼49% -51%
Fujitsu Celsius H780
NVIDIA Quadro P2000, Intel Core i7-8850H
89.31 fps ∼43% -56%
Lenovo ThinkPad P52 20MAS03N00
NVIDIA Quadro P1000, Intel Core i7-8750H
72.28 fps ∼35% -65%
Energy (energy-02)
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop)
 
36.2 fps ∼100% 0%
Lenovo ThinkPad P53-20QN000YGE
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H
36.15 fps ∼100%
MSI WS75 9TL-636
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H
36.03 fps ∼100% 0%
Average of class Workstation
  (0.72 - 38, n=25)
14.1 fps ∼39% -61%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H
12 fps ∼33% -67%
Fujitsu Celsius H780
NVIDIA Quadro P2000, Intel Core i7-8850H
5.28 fps ∼15% -85%
Lenovo ThinkPad P52 20MAS03N00
NVIDIA Quadro P1000, Intel Core i7-8750H
3.15 fps ∼9% -91%
Creo (creo-02)
Lenovo ThinkPad P53-20QN000YGE
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H
212.28 fps ∼100%
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop)
  (210 - 212, n=3)
211 fps ∼99% -1%
MSI WS75 9TL-636
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H
207.97 fps ∼98% -2%
Average of class Workstation
  (27.8 - 248, n=25)
126 fps ∼59% -41%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H
99.93 fps ∼47% -53%
Fujitsu Celsius H780
NVIDIA Quadro P2000, Intel Core i7-8850H
82.1 fps ∼39% -61%
Lenovo ThinkPad P52 20MAS03N00
NVIDIA Quadro P1000, Intel Core i7-8750H
68.84 fps ∼32% -68%
Catia (catia-05)
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop)
  (215 - 218, n=3)
216 fps ∼100% 0%
Lenovo ThinkPad P53-20QN000YGE
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H
215.72 fps ∼100%
MSI WS75 9TL-636
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H
212.62 fps ∼98% -1%
Average of class Workstation
  (27.7 - 302, n=25)
141 fps ∼65% -35%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H
121.33 fps ∼56% -44%
Fujitsu Celsius H780
NVIDIA Quadro P2000, Intel Core i7-8850H
104.04 fps ∼48% -52%
Lenovo ThinkPad P52 20MAS03N00
NVIDIA Quadro P1000, Intel Core i7-8750H
79.44 fps ∼37% -63%
3ds Max (3dsmax-06)
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop)
  (173 - 175, n=3)
174 fps ∼100% +1%
MSI WS75 9TL-636
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H
173.01 fps ∼99% 0%
Lenovo ThinkPad P53-20QN000YGE
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H
172.74 fps ∼99%
Average of class Workstation
  (20 - 182, n=25)
96.1 fps ∼55% -44%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H
83.89 fps ∼48% -51%
Fujitsu Celsius H780
NVIDIA Quadro P2000, Intel Core i7-8850H
71.66 fps ∼41% -59%
Lenovo ThinkPad P52 20MAS03N00
NVIDIA Quadro P1000, Intel Core i7-8750H
53.08 fps ∼31% -69%
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit
Room GPUs-only
MSI WS75 9TL-636
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H
2840 Samples/s ∼100% +44%
Dell Precision 7530
NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i9-8950HK
2170 Samples/s ∼76% +10%
Lenovo ThinkPad P53-20QN000YGE
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H
1972 Samples/s ∼69%
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop)
 
1972 Samples/s ∼69% 0%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H
1444 Samples/s ∼51% -27%
Fujitsu Celsius H780
NVIDIA Quadro P2000, Intel Core i7-8850H
1280 Samples/s ∼45% -35%
Average of class Workstation
  (49 - 2840, n=88)
897 Samples/s ∼32% -55%
Lenovo ThinkPad P52 20MAS03N00
NVIDIA Quadro P1000, Intel Core i7-8750H
713 Samples/s ∼25% -64%
Sala GPUs-only
MSI WS75 9TL-636
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H
5927 Samples/s ∼100% +21%
Lenovo ThinkPad P53-20QN000YGE
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H
4913 Samples/s ∼83%
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop)
 
4913 Samples/s ∼83% 0%
Dell Precision 7530
NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i9-8950HK
4192 Samples/s ∼71% -15%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H
2969 Samples/s ∼50% -40%
Fujitsu Celsius H780
NVIDIA Quadro P2000, Intel Core i7-8850H
2636 Samples/s ∼44% -46%
Average of class Workstation
  (48 - 5927, n=89)
1688 Samples/s ∼28% -66%
Lenovo ThinkPad P52 20MAS03N00
NVIDIA Quadro P1000, Intel Core i7-8750H
1260 Samples/s ∼21% -74%
3DMark 06 Standard
38739 punten
3DMark Vantage P Result
54153 punten
3DMark 11 Performance
19250 punten
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
98630 punten
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
38066 punten
3DMark Fire Strike Score
16547 punten
3DMark Time Spy Score
6879 punten
Help
05101520253035404550556065707580Tooltip
Lenovo ThinkPad P53-20QN000YGE Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop), 9850H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR; The Witcher 3: Ø70.6 (67-74)
lage gem. hoge ultraQHD4K
GTA V (2015) 177 170 150.4 77.6 68.4 fps
The Witcher 3 (2015) 320 235 141 71 46.4 fps
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 148 137 132 126 102 fps
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 281.4 198.6 134.5 110.1 45.4 fps
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 117 99 85 fps
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) 127 102 98 87 59 29 fps
Hitman 2 (2018) 87.7 85.3 78.4 75.3 73.3 46.6 fps
Battlefield V (2018) 153.6 105.4 88.2 81.2 68.3 42.5 fps
Far Cry New Dawn (2019) 107 98 90 86 72 43 fps
Dirt Rally 2.0 (2019) 275 188.9 160.3 89.3 66.8 fps
Anno 1800 (2019) 94.5 97.8 73.9 38.9 31.5 fps
F1 2019 (2019) 113 101 93 88 83 52 fps
Ghost Recon Breakpoint (2019) 127 105 93 65 47 26 fps
GRID 2019 (2019) 178.8 155.6 118.5 79.2 61.4 36.8 fps

Geluidsniveau

Onbelast
28.3 / 28.3 / 28.3 dB (A)
Belasting
29.8 / 38.3 dB (A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
stil
40 dB(A)
hoorbaar
50 dB(A)
luid
  
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm afstand)   environment noise: 28.3 dB(A)
Lenovo ThinkPad P53-20QN000YGE
Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop), 9850H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR		Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE
Quadro T1000 (Laptop), 9850H, WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G		Dell Precision 7530
Quadro P3200, 8950HK, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP		Fujitsu Celsius H780
Quadro P2000, 8850H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ		MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9880H, 2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ (RAID 0)		Lenovo ThinkPad P52 20MAS03N00
Quadro P1000, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
Noise
-4%
-12%
-20%
-18%
-3%
off / environment *
28.3
28.8
-2%
28.3
-0%
29.6
-5%
30.2
-7%
29.5
-4%
Idle Minimum *
28.3
28.8
-2%
28.3
-0%
29.6
-5%
32.8
-16%
29.5
-4%
Idle Average *
28.3
28.8
-2%
28.3
-0%
32.2
-14%
32.8
-16%
29.5
-4%
Idle Maximum *
28.3
28.8
-2%
30.5
-8%
37
-31%
33.6
-19%
29.5
-4%
Load Average *
29.8
36.1
-21%
34.5
-16%
40.3
-35%
40.9
-37%
34.7
-16%
Witcher 3 ultra *
38.3
49.5
-29%
33.1
14%
Load Maximum *
38.3
36.7
4%
49.5
-29%
49.4
-29%
42.7
-11%
39.4
-3%

* ... kleiner is beter

Max. Belasting
 41.8 °C41.6 °C41.3 °C 
 40.9 °C39.8 °C37.9 °C 
 36.3 °C37 °C34.1 °C 
Maximum: 41.8 °C
Gemiddelde: 39 °C
45.7 °C46.1 °C42.7 °C
41.7 °C43.7 °C45.6 °C
38.9 °C41.8 °C41.3 °C
Maximum: 46.1 °C
Gemiddelde: 43.1 °C
Stroomadapter (max.)  38.4 °C | Kamertemperatuur 18.9 °C | Voltcraft IR-900
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 39 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 31.3 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Workstation.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.8 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 37.2 °C / 99 F, ranging from 22.2 to 69.8 °C for the class Workstation.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 46.1 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 21.9 °C / 71 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 38 °C / 100 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 37.1 °C / 98.8 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.8 °C / 82 F (-9.3 °C / -16.8 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2030.426.62526.925.83126.629.34025.7255024.425.3632425.28021.725.510022.228.31252230.516022.640.520021.451.725020.254.93152056.64001961.250018.459.163017.758.780017.263.510001766.1125016.366.9160015.763.4200015.459.1250015.457.1315015.254.4400015.154500015.251.5630015.453.2800015.352.71000015.249.71250015.142.11600014.936SPL28.372.8N1.129.1median 16.3median 54.4Delta1.86.137.538.435.735.433.333.733.832.731.233.132.33431.737.23145.828.353.428.362.527.664.725.767.126.469.925.767.125.167.424.373.924.471.524.166.423.771.323.774.523.671.823.57123.56923.266.423.269.623.16823.171.22373.22365.62356.635.982.92.660.4median 23.7median 681.54hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseLenovo ThinkPad P53-20QN000YGEDell Precision 7530
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Lenovo ThinkPad P53-20QN000YGE audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (72.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 58% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 10%, average was 19%, worst was 31%
Compared to all devices tested
» 42% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 49% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Dell Precision 7530 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (74.45 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 10%, average was 19%, worst was 31%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Stroomgebruik
Uit / Standbydarklight 0.13 / 0.26 Watt
Inactiefdarkmidlight 7.9 / 11.8 / 14.9 Watt
Belasting midlight 96 / 207.8 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Lenovo ThinkPad P53-20QN000YGE
9850H, Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop), Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6		Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE
9850H, Quadro T1000 (Laptop), WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 15.6		Dell Precision 7530
8950HK, Quadro P3200, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6		Fujitsu Celsius H780
8850H, Quadro P2000, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 15.6		MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657
9880H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ (RAID 0), IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6		Lenovo ThinkPad P52 20MAS03N00
8750H, Quadro P1000, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 15.6
Power Consumption
-20%
-40%
3%
-22%
35%
Idle Minimum *
7.9
13.7
-73%
15.7
-99%
9.1
-15%
9.4
-19%
4.02
49%
Idle Average *
11.8
17.5
-48%
20.3
-72%
13.2
-12%
17.4
-47%
7.2
39%
Idle Maximum *
14.9
20.9
-40%
25.7
-72%
14.04
6%
19.6
-32%
11.46
23%
Load Average *
96
77.2
20%
118.9
-24%
78.8
18%
103
-7%
76.3
21%
Load Maximum *
207.8
123.7
40%
174
16%
172.5
17%
216
-4%
154
26%
Witcher 3 ultra *
149
131.2
12%
74
50%

* ... kleiner is beter

Batterijduur
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3 (Edge 44.18362.387.0)
11h 04min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3 max Brightness (Edge 44.18362.387.0)
8h 38min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
9h 50min
Belast (maximale helderheid)
1h 57min
Lenovo ThinkPad P53-20QN000YGE
9850H, Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop), 90 Wh		Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE
9850H, Quadro T1000 (Laptop), 80 Wh		Dell Precision 7530
8950HK, Quadro P3200, 97 Wh		Fujitsu Celsius H780
8850H, Quadro P2000, 96 Wh		MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657
9880H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 82 Wh		Lenovo ThinkPad P52 20MAS03N00
8750H, Quadro P1000, 96 Wh		Average of class Workstation
 
Batterijduur
-19%
-39%
-32%
-45%
-4%
-29%
Reader / Idle
382
577
1519
620 (63 - 2360, n=124)
H.264
590
560
-5%
733
24%
418 (123 - 1131, n=65)
-29%
WiFi v1.3
664
532
-20%
278
-58%
450
-32%
357
-46%
637
-4%
417 (106 - 974, n=76)
-37%
Load
117
79
-32%
95
-19%
65
-44%
79
-32%
91.4 (22 - 323, n=123)
-22%

Pro

+ stevige, goede gebouwde behuizing
+ erg goede GPU prestaties
+ uitstekend toetsenbord
+ excellent keyboard
+ conservatieve ventilatoren
+ helder, mat 1080p beeldscherm
+ goede aansluitingen
+ fatsoenlijke onderhoudbaarheid
+ zeer veel configuratie opties
+ uitgebreide garantie

Contra

- CPU prestaties gereduceerd bij volle belasting
- zwakkere 80 watt versie van de Quadro RTX 5000 (zonder vermelding hiervan)
- slechte webcam
- matige luidsprekers
- WWAN niet gereed (geen antennes)
In review: Lenovo ThinkPad P53. Test device courtesy of Lenovo Germany
In review: Lenovo ThinkPad P53. Test device courtesy of Lenovo Germany

Dit is de verkorte versie van het originele artikel. Het volledige, Engelse testrapport vind je hier.

De ThinkPad P53 is een traditioneel notebook die niet veel aandacht besteed aan de huidige trends van slanke behuizingen en dunne beeldschermranden. Hierdoor is de behuizing erg robuust. Er zijn veel poorten, componenten upgraden is makkelijk en de hardware is erg krachtig, vooral op het grafische vlak.

Aan het uiterlijk is er weinig veranderd ten opzichte van de ThinkPad P52 van vorig jaar. Echter zijn er wel wat aanpassingen geweest onder de motorkap. De belangrijkste pluspunten zijn de krachtige videokaarten (Quadro RTX 4000 en 5000). Deze kaarten worden normaal gesproken gereserveerd voor de grotere 17-inch laptops. Echter is dit ook een punt van kritiek aangezien consumenten niet weten welke versie videokaarten ze kunnen verwachten. NVIDIA nog Lenovo willen bevestigen of het om de langzamere 80-watt versie in het systeem is gebouwd. Lenovo gebruikt waarschijnlijk de tragere variant van de RTX-kaarten. Al met al zijn de grafische prestaties nog steeds erg indrukwekkend.

Een scherp 1080p paneel, uitstekende invoerapparaten en indrukwekkende prestaties: de ThinkPad P53 is een goed gebalanceerd product zonder echte nadelen. Het enige waar we kritiek op hadden was het koelsysteem dat beter geoptimaliseerd kon zijn voor gecombineerde CPU & GPU ladingen.

Het koelsysteem is ook verre van perfect. We waarderen het conservatieve ventilatorbeheer. Deze verhindert het ronddraaien van de ventilatoren na korte periodes van belasting. Echter is het koelsysteem niet in staat om bij een gecombineerde CPU & GPU belasting voldoende te koelen. Dit resulteert in lagere processor prestaties. Hoewel stille ventilatoren goed zijn, kiezen gebruikers in deze prijsklasse waarschijnlijk voor high-end componenten omdat ze zoveel mogelijk prestaties nodig hebben. We kunnen alleen maar raden naar de prestaties van andere configuraties van de P53. We gaan ervanuit dat de uitvoeringen met de minder krachtige GPU’s (zoals de RTX 3000 of T-serie) beter gebruik maken van de CPU.

Net als veel andere moderne ThinkPads heeft de Lenovo P53 significante upgrades voor zijn beeldschermopties gekregen. Terwijl de basisconfiguratie nog steeds een IPS paneel heeft met 300cd/m² is er nu een betere en bovenal helderder 1080p model beschikbaar. Verder biedt Lenovo twee hoge resolutie schermen (een 4K-IPS en een 4K-OLED paneel). Dit garandeert dat alle gebruikers het model vinden wat ze zoeken.

De minpunten zijn ietwat muggenzifterij, omdat de ThinkPad P53 niet echt grote nadelen heeft en zijn goede score zonder meer verdient.

Lenovo ThinkPad P53-20QN000YGE - 14-11-2019 v7
Andreas Osthoff

Behuizing
83 / 98 → 84%
Toetsenbord
94%
Aanwijsapparaat
89%
Aansluitmogelijkheden
78 / 80 → 97%
Gewicht
59 / 10-66 → 87%
Batterij
86 / 95 → 90%
Beeldscherm
89%
Gaming-performance
92%
Applicatie-performance
92%
Temperatuur
86 / 95 → 91%
Luidheid
97 / 90 → 100%
Audio
65%
Camera
38 / 85 → 44%
Gemiddelde
81%
90%
Workstation - Gewogen Gemiddelde

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Overzichten en testrapporten over laptops en mobieltjes > Testrapporten > Kort testrapport Lenovo ThinkPad P53: klassiek werkstation met veel GPU prestaties
Andreas Osthoff, 2019-11-13 (Update: 2019-11-24)