Notebookcheck

Kort testrapport Huawei P10 Plus Smartphone

Manuel Masiero, 10-06-2017

Verbeterde prestaties? De Huawei P10 Plus is de grotere en betere broer van Huawei's P10 topmodel, welke een "Zeer Goed" score wist te behalen in ons testrapport. Zal de 5,5 inch P10 Plus nog overtuigender zijn? Lees het hier.

Huawei P10 Plus (P10 Serie)
Processor
HiSilicon Kirin 960 2.4 GHz
Grafische kaart
ARM Mali-G71 MP8
Geheugen
6144 MB 
, LPDDR4
Beeldscherm
5.5 inch 16:9, 2560x1440 pixel 540 PPI, LTPS, capacitief touchscreen, 10 multi-touch punten, Knuckle Touch, LTPS, Corning Gorilla Glass 5, glimmend: ja
Opslag
128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash, 128 GB 
, 109 GB beschikbaar
Verbindingen
1 USB 2.0, Audio Verbindingen: 3.5-mm, Card Reader: micro-SD cards max. 256 GB, 1 Vingerafdruklezer, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensoren: vingerafdrukscanner, gyroscoop, versnellingsmeter, kompas, nabijheid, Hall magneet, IR, Miracast, DLNA, USB-OTG, Wi-Fi Direct, Galileo, GLONASS, BeiDou
Netwerkmogelijkheden
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.2, GSM (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), UMTS (band 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 8, 19), LTE Cat. 12 (band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 9, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 29, 38, 39, 40), downloads maximaal 600 MBit/s, uploads maximaal 100 MBit/s, head-SAR 0.89 W/kg, body-SAR 0.76 W/kg, LTE, GPS
Afmetingen
hoogte x breedte x diepte (in mm): 7 x 153.5 x 74.2
Batterij
3750 mAh Lithium-Polymer, Huawei SuperCharge
Besturingssysteem
Android 7.0 Nougat
Camera
Primary Camera: 20 MPix 20 MP monochroom + 12 MP RGB Leica dual camera, Summilux-H 1:1.8/27 ASPH, OIS, hybride autofocus (fasedetectie, contrast, laser en diepte autofocus), tweekleurige flits, 4K-Video-opnames
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix F/1.9, AF
Bijkomende functionaliteiten
Luidsprekers: stereo luidsprekers, Toetsenbord: virtueel, Toetsenbordverlichting: ja, modulaire stroomadapter, USB Type-C kabel, SIM gereedschap, headset, hoes, snelstartgids, EMUI 5.1, 36 Maanden Garantie, fanless
Gewicht
165 g, Voeding: 45 g
Prijs
700 Euro

 

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
Mali-G71 MP20, 8895 Octa, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash (Linksys EA8500, 5.0 GHz)
368 MBit/s ∼100% +802%
LG G6
Adreno 530, 821 MSM8996 Pro, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash (Linksys EA8500, 5.0 GHz)
325 MBit/s ∼88% +697%
OnePlus 3T
Adreno 530, 821 MSM8996 Pro, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
257 MBit/s ∼70% +530%
Huawei P10
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash (Linksys EA8500, 5.0 GHz)
48.8 MBit/s ∼13% +20%
Huawei P10 Plus
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash (Linksys EA8500, 5.0 GHz)
40.8 MBit/s ∼11%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
Mali-G71 MP20, 8895 Octa, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash (Linksys EA8500, 5.0 GHz)
656 MBit/s ∼100% +413%
OnePlus 3T
Adreno 530, 821 MSM8996 Pro, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
313 MBit/s ∼48% +145%
LG G6
Adreno 530, 821 MSM8996 Pro, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash (Linksys EA8500, 5.0 GHz)
220 MBit/s ∼34% +72%
Huawei P10
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash (Linksys EA8500, 5.0 GHz)
154 MBit/s ∼23% +20%
Huawei P10 Plus
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash (Linksys EA8500, 5.0 GHz)
128 MBit/s ∼20%
Huawei P10 Plus
Huawei P10 Plus
Huawei P10 Plus
Huawei P10 Plus
Huawei P10 Plus
Huawei P10 Plus
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500

Beeldvergelijking

Bekijk een scène en navigeer binnen het eerste beeld. Eén klik wijzigt het zoomniveau. Eén klik op het ingezoomde beeld opent het origineel in een nieuw venster. Het eerste beeld toont de verschaalde foto van het testtoestel.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
542
cd/m²
550
cd/m²
557
cd/m²
541
cd/m²
568
cd/m²
579
cd/m²
550
cd/m²
582
cd/m²
586
cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 586 cd/m² Gemiddelde: 561.7 cd/m² Minimum: 2.93 cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling: 92 %
Helderheid in Batterij-modus: 568 cd/m²
Contrast: 1321:1 (Zwart: 0.43 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.4 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 2.5 | - Ø
Gamma: 2.37
Huawei P10 Plus
LTPS, 2560x1440, 5.5
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5
Huawei P10
LTPS, 1920x1080, 5.1
OnePlus 3T
Optic-AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
Super AMOLED, 2960x1440, 6.2
LG G6
IPS LCD, 2880x1440, 5.7
Lenovo Moto Z
AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.5
Screen
22%
-32%
-100%
17%
-10%
-1%
Brightness
562
553
-2%
556
-1%
430
-23%
562
0%
611
9%
490
-13%
Brightness Distribution
92
97
5%
86
-7%
84
-9%
93
1%
89
-3%
92
0%
Black Level *
0.43
0.35
19%
0.43
-0%
0.23
47%
Contrast
1321
1591
20%
1272
-4%
2809
113%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
2.4
1.4
42%
4.8
-100%
7.1
-196%
1.7
29%
4.5
-88%
2.1
12%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
2.5
1.3
48%
4.5
-80%
6.8
-172%
1.6
36%
6
-140%
2.6
-4%
Gamma
2.37 101%
2.21 109%
2.39 100%
2.23 108%
2.13 113%
2.27 106%
2.23 108%
CCT
6779 96%
6667 97%
7194 90%
7866 83%
6435 101%
7996 81%
6843 95%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
63.1
81.57
67.74
88.14
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
99.83
99.87
99.05
100

* ... kleiner is beter

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Om de schermhelderheid te verlagen schakelen sommige laptops het backlight erg snel aan en uit. Dit gebeurt aan een dergelijk hoge frequentie dat het niet zichtbaar is voor het menselijk oog. Als de frequentie te laag is kunnen personen met gevoelige ogen geïrriteerd geraken, hoofdpijn krijgen en zelfs flickering waarnemen.
Screen flickering / PWM niet waargenomen

Ter vergelijking: 59 % van alle geteste toestellen maakten geen gebruik van PWM om de schermhelderheid te verlagen. Als het wel werd gebruikt, werd een gemiddelde van 4287 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz waargenomen.

Responstijd Scherm

De responstijden van het scherm tonen hoe snel het scherm in staat is om van één kleur naar de andere te veranderen. Trage responstijden kunnen aanleiding geven tot 'nabeelden' rond bewegende objecten of het scherm wazig maken (blur). Vooral spelers van snelle 3D-games hebben baat bij een scherm met snelle responstijden.
       Responstijd Zwart naar Wit
17.6 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd↗ 5.2 ms stijging
↘ 12.4 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde prima responstijden in onze tests maar is misschien wat te traag voor competitieve games.
Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.8 (minimum) tot 240 (maximum) ms. » 9 % van alle toestellen zijn beter.
Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd beter is dan het gemiddelde (27.1 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.
       Responstijd 50% Grijs naar 80% Grijs
38 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd↗ 17.6 ms stijging
↘ 20.4 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde trage responstijden in onze tests en is misschien te traag voor games.
Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.9 (minimum) tot 636 (maximum) ms. » 32 % van alle toestellen zijn beter.
Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd beter is dan het gemiddelde (43.7 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.
AnTuTu Benchmark v6 - Total Score (sorteer op waarde)
Huawei P10 Plus
138326 Points ∼61%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
165399 Points ∼73% +20%
Huawei P10
140084 Points ∼61% +1%
OnePlus 3T
159866 Points ∼70% +16%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
165382 Points ∼73% +20%
LG G6
151751 Points ∼67% +10%
Lenovo Moto Z
129197 Points ∼57% -7%
Geekbench 4.1
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sorteer op waarde)
Huawei P10 Plus
6267 Points ∼41%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
6695 Points ∼44% +7%
LG G6
4369 Points ∼29% -30%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sorteer op waarde)
Huawei P10 Plus
1852 Points ∼39%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
2015 Points ∼42% +9%
LG G6
1831 Points ∼38% -1%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Huawei P10 Plus
1679 Points ∼56%
Huawei P10
1902 Points ∼63% +13%
OnePlus 3T
1728 Points ∼57% +3%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
2466 Points ∼82% +47%
LG G6
1955 Points ∼65% +16%
Lenovo Moto Z
1797 Points ∼60% +7%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Huawei P10 Plus
1767 Points ∼33%
Huawei P10
2409 Points ∼45% +36%
OnePlus 3T
2418 Points ∼45% +37%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
3479 Points ∼65% +97%
LG G6
2980 Points ∼55% +69%
Lenovo Moto Z
2336 Points ∼43% +32%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sorteer op waarde)
Huawei P10 Plus
1747 Points ∼45%
Huawei P10
2274 Points ∼59% +30%
OnePlus 3T
2221 Points ∼57% +27%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
3188 Points ∼82% +82%
LG G6
2669 Points ∼69% +53%
Lenovo Moto Z
2190 Points ∼56% +25%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Huawei P10 Plus
1662 Points ∼57%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
1522 Points ∼52% -8%
Huawei P10
2193 Points ∼75% +32%
OnePlus 3T
1452 Points ∼50% -13%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
2465 Points ∼84% +48%
LG G6
1961 Points ∼67% +18%
Lenovo Moto Z
1828 Points ∼63% +10%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Huawei P10 Plus
2469 Points ∼32%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
4235 Points ∼55% +72%
Huawei P10
2816 Points ∼36% +14%
OnePlus 3T
3310 Points ∼43% +34%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
4786 Points ∼62% +94%
LG G6
4121 Points ∼53% +67%
Lenovo Moto Z
3718 Points ∼48% +51%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sorteer op waarde)
Huawei P10 Plus
2229 Points ∼45%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
3034 Points ∼61% +36%
Huawei P10
2649 Points ∼53% +19%
OnePlus 3T
2577 Points ∼52% +16%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
3958 Points ∼80% +78%
LG G6
3282 Points ∼66% +47%
Lenovo Moto Z
3023 Points ∼61% +36%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Huawei P10 Plus
14934 Points ∼22%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
15626 Points ∼23% +5%
Huawei P10
15341 Points ∼22% +3%
OnePlus 3T
22426 Points ∼32% +50%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
20892 Points ∼30% +40%
LG G6
22335 Points ∼32% +50%
Lenovo Moto Z
20948 Points ∼30% +40%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sorteer op waarde)
Huawei P10 Plus
33307 Points ∼7%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
63386 Points ∼14% +90%
Huawei P10
35964 Points ∼8% +8%
OnePlus 3T
34494 Points ∼8% +4%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
33077 Points ∼7% -1%
LG G6
32128 Points ∼7% -4%
Lenovo Moto Z
26659 Points ∼6% -20%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sorteer op waarde)
Huawei P10 Plus
26156 Points ∼13%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
37746 Points ∼19% +44%
Huawei P10
27692 Points ∼14% +6%
OnePlus 3T
30810 Points ∼16% +18%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
29282 Points ∼15% +12%
LG G6
29276 Points ∼15% +12%
Lenovo Moto Z
25135 Points ∼13% -4%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sorteer op waarde)
Huawei P10 Plus
56 fps ∼4%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
91.96 fps ∼7% +64%
Huawei P10
69 fps ∼5% +23%
OnePlus 3T
91 fps ∼7% +63%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
104 fps ∼8% +86%
LG G6
75 fps ∼6% +34%
Lenovo Moto Z
77 fps ∼6% +38%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sorteer op waarde)
Huawei P10 Plus
40 fps ∼9%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
57.71 fps ∼13% +44%
Huawei P10
55 fps ∼12% +38%
OnePlus 3T
59 fps ∼13% +48%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
58 fps ∼13% +45%
LG G6
46 fps ∼10% +15%
Lenovo Moto Z
53 fps ∼12% +33%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sorteer op waarde)
Huawei P10 Plus
19 fps ∼3%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
58.71 fps ∼11% +209%
Huawei P10
30 fps ∼6% +58%
OnePlus 3T
46 fps ∼8% +142%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
50 fps ∼9% +163%
LG G6
38 fps ∼7% +100%
Lenovo Moto Z
41 fps ∼8% +116%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sorteer op waarde)
Huawei P10 Plus
29 fps ∼13%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
55.17 fps ∼24% +90%
Huawei P10
32 fps ∼14% +10%
OnePlus 3T
45 fps ∼20% +55%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
38 fps ∼17% +31%
LG G6
27 fps ∼12% -7%
Lenovo Moto Z
26 fps ∼11% -10%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Huawei P10 Plus
22 fps ∼5%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
41.3 fps ∼10% +88%
Huawei P10
24 fps ∼6% +9%
OnePlus 3T
32 fps ∼8% +45%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
42 fps ∼10% +91%
LG G6
29 fps ∼7% +32%
Lenovo Moto Z
27 fps ∼6% +23%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Huawei P10 Plus
12 fps ∼7%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
41.5 fps ∼24% +246%
Huawei P10
25 fps ∼14% +108%
OnePlus 3T
32 fps ∼18% +167%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
23 fps ∼13% +92%
LG G6
16 fps ∼9% +33%
Lenovo Moto Z
15 fps ∼9% +25%
PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sorteer op waarde)
Huawei P10 Plus
7377 Points ∼89%
Huawei P10
7341 Points ∼88% 0%
OnePlus 3T
5664 Points ∼68% -23%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
5830 Points ∼70% -21%
LG G6
5703 Points ∼69% -23%
Lenovo Moto Z
7637 Points ∼92% +4%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sorteer op waarde)
Huawei P10 Plus
1054 Points ∼68%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
1542 Points ∼100% +46%
Huawei P10
1077 Points ∼70% +2%
OnePlus 3T
891 Points ∼58% -15%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
1163 Points ∼75% +10%
LG G6
1073 Points ∼70% +2%
Lenovo Moto Z
959 Points ∼62% -9%
Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Huawei P10 Plus
3438 Points ∼40%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
6875 Points ∼80% +100%
Huawei P10
4115 Points ∼48% +20%
OnePlus 3T
4444 Points ∼52% +29%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
6126 Points ∼71% +78%
LG G6
5138 Points ∼60% +49%
Lenovo Moto Z
4321 Points ∼50% +26%
Memory (sorteer op waarde)
Huawei P10 Plus
3331 Points ∼78%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
1319 Points ∼31% -60%
Huawei P10
2778 Points ∼65% -17%
OnePlus 3T
1954 Points ∼46% -41%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
3135 Points ∼73% -6%
LG G6
1930 Points ∼45% -42%
Lenovo Moto Z
2190 Points ∼51% -34%
System (sorteer op waarde)
Huawei P10 Plus
3572 Points ∼54%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
6582 Points ∼100% +84%
Huawei P10
3830 Points ∼58% +7%
OnePlus 3T
3130 Points ∼48% -12%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
5319 Points ∼81% +49%
LG G6
3646 Points ∼55% +2%
Lenovo Moto Z
3398 Points ∼52% -5%
Overall (sorteer op waarde)
Huawei P10 Plus
2563 Points ∼69%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
3097 Points ∼84% +21%
Huawei P10
2621 Points ∼71% +2%
OnePlus 3T
2218 Points ∼60% -13%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
3301 Points ∼89% +29%
LG G6
2496 Points ∼68% -3%
Lenovo Moto Z
2356 Points ∼64% -8%

Legende

 
Huawei P10 Plus HiSilicon Kirin 960, ARM Mali-G71 MP8, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
 
Apple iPhone 7 Plus Apple A10 Fusion, Apple A10 Fusion GPU / PowerVR, 128 GB NVMe
 
Huawei P10 HiSilicon Kirin 960, ARM Mali-G71 MP8, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
OnePlus 3T Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus Samsung Exynos 8895 Octa, ARM Mali-G71 MP20, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
LG G6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
 
Lenovo Moto Z Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 32 GB eMMC Flash
Octane V2 - Total Score (sorteer op waarde)
Huawei P10 Plus (Chrome 58.0.3029.83)
10213 Points ∼21%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus (Safari Mobile 10.0)
26053 Points ∼53% +155%
Huawei P10 (Chrome 56)
10236 Points ∼21% 0%
OnePlus 3T (Chrome 54.0.2840.85)
9798 Points ∼20% -4%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus (Samsung Browser 5.2)
14050 Points ∼28% +38%
LG G6 (Chrome 57)
9113 Points ∼18% -11%
Lenovo Moto Z (Chrome 53)
7771 Points ∼16% -24%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score (sorteer op waarde)
Huawei P10 Plus (Chrome 58.0.3029.83)
3107 ms * ∼5%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus (Safari Mobile 10.0)
1102.7 ms * ∼2% +65%
Huawei P10 (Chrome 56)
3128.7 ms * ∼5% -1%
OnePlus 3T (Chrome 54.0.2840.85)
2719.3 ms * ∼5% +12%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus (Samsung Browser 5.2)
2236.7 ms * ∼4% +28%
LG G6 (Chrome 57)
2464.2 ms * ∼4% +21%
Lenovo Moto Z (Chrome 53)
3154.7 ms * ∼5% -2%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score (sorteer op waarde)
Huawei P10 Plus
140 Points ∼24%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
204 Points ∼35% +46%
Huawei P10 (Chrome 56)
136 Points ∼23% -3%
OnePlus 3T (Chrome 54.0.2840.85)
135 Points ∼23% -4%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus (Samsung Browser 5.2)
154 Points ∼27% +10%
LG G6 (Chrome 57)
122 Points ∼21% -13%
Lenovo Moto Z (Chrome 53)
112 Points ∼19% -20%
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score (sorteer op waarde)
Huawei P10 Plus
58.427 Points ∼0%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus (Safari Mobile 10.0)
168.08 Points ∼1% +188%
Huawei P10 (Chrome 56)
57.9 Points ∼0% -1%
OnePlus 3T (Chrome 54.0.2840.85)
54.526 Points ∼0% -7%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus (Samsung Browser 5.2)
62.198 Points ∼0% +6%
LG G6 (Chrome 57)
56.628 Points ∼0% -3%
Lenovo Moto Z (Chrome 53)
47.5 Points ∼0% -19%

* ... kleiner is beter

Huawei P10 PlusHuawei P10OnePlus 3TSamsung Galaxy S8 PlusLG G6Lenovo Moto Z
AndroBench 3-5
0%
-32%
-0%
-18%
-8%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
33.61 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
32.19 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-4%
57.24 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
70%
53.33 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
59%
45.64 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
36%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
54.04 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
54.22 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
0%
71.12 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
32%
77.61 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
44%
78.51 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
45%
Random Write 4KB
149.78
152.31
2%
74.39
-50%
15.27
-90%
16.58
-89%
74.93
-50%
Random Read 4KB
173.06
168.42
-3%
123.57
-29%
127.18
-27%
95.19
-45%
117.15
-32%
Sequential Write 256KB
182.64
189.83
4%
165.3
-9%
194.18
6%
122.85
-33%
168.32
-8%
Sequential Read 256KB
732.94
737.65
1%
436.43
-40%
787.6
7%
428.67
-42%
439.66
-40%
Asphalt 8: Airborne
 InstellingenWaarde
 high30 fps
 very low30 fps
in vergelijking
Lenovo Moto E3 (min)
 MT6735P, Mali-T720
11
   ...
Lenovo Phab 2 Pro
 652 MSM8976, Adreno 510
30
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
 8895 Octa, Mali-G71 MP20
30
Huawei P10 Plus
 Kirin 960, Mali-G71 MP8
30
Lenovo Yoga Book Android YB1-X90F
 Z8550, HD Graphics 400 (Braswell)
30
Samsung Galaxy J7 2016
 7870 Octa, Mali-T830 MP2
30
   ...
HTC 10 (max)
 820 MSM8996, Adreno 530
48
Dead Trigger 2
 InstellingenWaarde
 high56 fps
Max. Belasting
 48.2 °C47.3 °C44.9 °C 
 48.3 °C47.3 °C49.1 °C 
 47 °C46.5 °C48.8 °C 
Maximum: 49.1 °C
Gemiddelde: 47.5 °C
40.9 °C43.2 °C44.1 °C
41.2 °C42.4 °C44.2 °C
40.7 °C42.6 °C44.1 °C
Maximum: 44.2 °C
Gemiddelde: 42.6 °C
Stroomadapter (max.)  37.1 °C | Kamertemperatuur 21.5 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.635.22525.433.13125.329.94032.9255033.629.26331.631.28028.426.9100272612520.833.91602243.520021.349.925020.854.831521.257.540019.462.350019.566.463017.767.380017.964100017.863.2125017.364.9160017.462.5200016.756.3250017.260315018.261400017.963.2500017.662.8630017.760.3800017.861.61000017.962.51250018.164.51600018.255.8SPL3075.6N1.336.8median 17.9Huawei P10 Plusmedian 61.6Delta1.34.831.639.925.439.825.339.732.934.733.634.731.632.728.427.82726.420.828.62241.521.350.520.855.921.260.319.46519.568.617.766.817.964.417.866.917.371.517.473.516.774.517.273.718.272.217.970.517.670.717.764.817.860.417.95918.148.418.232.83082.71.352.3median 17.9Huawei P10median 64.81.310.626.428.426.42826.72825.828.725.829.133.229.126.12626.123.925.523.927.724.727.733.426.933.441.53741.540.320.240.343.720.243.745.521.845.547224752.822.252.860.121.860.166.517.266.569.217.869.271.619.871.669.919.169.96815.46869.515.669.56614.96671.514.771.571.214.271.272.21472.271.213.971.26713.86758.913.958.952.413.952.454.713.754.781.529.581.549.91.349.9median 66Apple iPhone 7 Plusmedian 17.2median 6610.93.810.9hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Huawei P10 Plus audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 14% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Huawei P10 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.74 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 26% of all tested devices in this class were better, 13% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 55% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 37% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Apple iPhone 7 Plus audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.45 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 10% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 78% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 46% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 47% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Stroomgebruik
Uit / Standbydarklight 0.07 / 0.33 Watt
Inactiefdarkmidlight 1.03 / 2.61 / 2.83 Watt
Belasting midlight 7.03 / 10.08 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Huawei P10 Plus
3750 mAh
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
2915 mAh
Huawei P10
3200 mAh
OnePlus 3T
3400 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
3500 mAh
LG G6
3300 mAh
Lenovo Moto Z
2600 mAh
Power Consumption
23%
15%
21%
46%
30%
44%
Idle Minimum *
1.03
0.77
25%
0.83
19%
0.61
41%
0.68
34%
0.62
40%
0.66
36%
Idle Average *
2.61
2.04
22%
2.1
20%
1.77
32%
1.13
57%
1.43
45%
1.01
61%
Idle Maximum *
2.83
2.24
21%
2.18
23%
1.81
36%
1.16
59%
1.48
48%
1.09
61%
Load Average *
7.03
4.69
33%
6.57
7%
6.67
5%
4.69
33%
5.52
21%
3.97
44%
Load Maximum *
10.08
8.66
14%
9.32
8%
10.98
-9%
5.24
48%
10.47
-4%
8.34
17%

* ... kleiner is beter

Batterijduur
Inactief (zonder WLAN, minimale helderheid)
27h 35min
Surfen met WLAN v1.3
12h 40min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
12h 36min
Belast (maximale helderheid)
2h 54min
Huawei P10 Plus
3750 mAh
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
2915 mAh
Huawei P10
3200 mAh
OnePlus 3T
3400 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
3500 mAh
LG G6
3300 mAh
Lenovo Moto Z
2600 mAh
Batterijduur
6%
-1%
5%
12%
12%
4%
Reader / Idle
1655
1835
11%
1540
-7%
1423
-14%
1565
-5%
1789
8%
1371
-17%
Load
174
225
29%
176
1%
282
62%
275
58%
252
45%
320
84%
WiFi v1.3
760
587
-23%
966
27%
494
-35%
736
-3%
692
-9%
407
-46%
H.264
756
813
8%
582
-23%
810
7%
742
-2%
779
3%
724
-4%

Pro

+ Elegant ontwerp, hoogwaardige behuizing
+ Zeer snelle SoC
+ 128 GB UFS 2.1 opslag
+ Uitbreidbaar geheugen
+ 6 GB RAM
+ Zeer goede Leica dubbele camera
+ Zeer helder WQHD beeldscherm
+ Lange looptijden
+ Goede stereo luidsprekers
+ Snelladen via SuperCharge
+ Tot 3 jaar garantie

Contra

- Opslag is niet consistent
- Firmware reserveert veel opslag
- Geen App2SD
- Langzaam Wi-Fi
- Matige micro-SD overdrachtssnelheden
- Sub-optimale prestaties onder belasting
Getest: Huawei P10 Plus (VKY-L09). Testmodel geleverd door:
Getest: Huawei P10 Plus (VKY-L09). Testmodel geleverd door:

Voor het volledige, Engelse testrapport, klik hier.

Net zoals de 5,1 inch Huawei's P10 heeft de grotere 5,5 inch Huawei P10 Plus voornamelijk positieve indrukken achtergelaten. De P10 Plus bevat vele hoogwaardige onderdelen, zoals de perfecte behuizing, de UFS 2.1 opslag, LTE Cat.12 en de snelle HiSilicon Kirin 960 SoC.

Zonder twijfel is de Huawei P10 Plus een uitstekende toptelefoon. Echter, het apparaat kan zich ondanks de hoogwaardige componenten niet goed onderscheiden van de goedkopere Huawei P10.

Voor de hogere adviesprijs van €749 in tegenstelling tot €600 voor de P10, wordt de P10 Plus uitgerust met 6 GB RAM, 128 GB opslagruimte, een WQHD resolutie beeldscherm (in plaats van Full HD), een sterkere batterij en een enigszins verbeterde dubbele Leica camera. Deze verbeteringen rechtvaardigen wellicht de hogere prijs op papier, maar in de praktijk zijn er nauwelijks verschillen merkbaar. Afgezien van de grotere afmetingen, zijn de verschillen uiteindelijk insignificant.

Wat over blijft is een zeer goede smartphone, die helaas wordt geteisterd door dezelfde tekortkomingen als de Huawei P10. De zwakke Wi-Fi module, langzame micro-SD kaartslot, suboptimale prestaties onder zware belasting, het grote aandeel van Firmware in de opslagruimte en het onbekende geheugentype zijn gemiste kansen om het apparaat te kunnen onderscheiden van de massa. Het blijft een gok of kopers een model krijgen met snel UFS geheugen of langzaam eMMC geheugen.

Huawei P10 Plus - 06-06-2017 v6
Manuel Masiero

Behuizing
92%
Toetsenbord
71 / 75 → 94%
Aanwijsapparaat
96%
Aansluitmogelijkheden
48 / 60 → 81%
Gewicht
91%
Batterij
95%
Beeldscherm
91%
Gaming-performance
56 / 63 → 88%
Applicatie-performance
58 / 70 → 83%
Temperatuur
78%
Luidheid
100%
Audio
81 / 91 → 89%
Camera
81%
Gemiddelde
80%
89%
Smartphone - Gewogen Gemiddelde

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Overzichten en testrapporten over laptops en mobieltjes > Testrapporten > Kort testrapport Huawei P10 Plus Smartphone
Manuel Masiero, 2017-06-10 (Update: 2017-06-10)