Notebookcheck

Kort testrapport Huawei MatePad T8 Tablet: Is de tablet van 99 euro zijn prijs waard

Is Huawei vergeten dat het jaar 2020 is? De Huawei MatePad T8 is een tablet van minder dan 100 euro. Daarom moesten er bepaalde toegevingen gedaan worden op het vlak van hardware. Als je alleen de specificaties van de MatePad T8 voor je had liggen, zou je waarschijnlijk denken dat het een tablet was uit 2017, niet uit 2020.
Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Daniel Schmidt, Felicitas Krohn,
Huawei MatePad T8 (MatePad Serie)
Processor
Mediatek MT8768 8 x 1.5 - 2 GHz, Cortex-A53, Mediatek MT8768
Grafische kaart
PowerVR GE8320
Geheugen
2048 MB 
Beeldscherm
8 inch 16:10, 1280 x 800 pixel 189 PPI, capacitief touchscreen, LCD, glimmend: ja, 60 Hz
Opslag
16 GB eMMC Flash, 16 GB 
, 9.7 GB beschikbaar
Verbindingen
1 USB 2.0, Audio Verbindingen: 3.5-mm koptelefoon-aansluiting, Card Reader: Geheugenkaarten (microSD) tot 512 GB, Sensoren: bewegingssensor, OTG, LED-indicator
Netwerkmogelijkheden
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.0, LTE FDD: B1 / B3 / B5 / B7 / B8 / B18 / B19 / B20 / B26 / B28, TD-LTE: B38 / B40 / B41, UMTS: B1 / B2 / B5 / B6 / B8 / B19, GSM: B2 / B3 / B5 / B8, LTE, GPS
Afmetingen
hoogte x breedte x diepte (in mm): 8.55 x 199.7 x 121.1
Batterij
5100 mAh Lithium-Ion
Besturingssysteem
Android 10
Camera
Primary Camera: 5 MPix f/2.2 diafragma, Camera2 API: full
Secondary Camera: 2 MPix f/2.4 diafragma
Bijkomende functionaliteiten
Luidsprekers: mono, Toetsenbord: virtueel, oplader, micro-USB-kabel, quick-start-handleiding, garantie-informatie, EMUI 10, 24 Maanden Garantie, Widevine L3, fanless
Gewicht
310 g, Voeding: 43 g
Prijs
119 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Evaluatie
Datum
Model
Gewicht
Hoogte
Formaat
Resolutie
Best Price
81 %
09-2020
Huawei MatePad T8
Helio MT8768, PowerVR GE8320
310 g8.55 mm8"1280x800
81 %
07-2020
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020
MT8168, Mali-G52 MP2
355 g9.7 mm8"1280x800
81 %
08-2020
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
MT8168, Mali-G52 MP2
355 g9.7 mm8"1280x800
81 %
02-2020
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320
305 g8.2 mm8"1280x800
80 %
01-2020
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
SD 429, Adreno 504
345 g8 mm8"1280x800

Formaat Vergelijking

210 mm 124.4 mm 8 mm 345 g202 mm 137 mm 9.7 mm 355 g202 mm 137 mm 9.7 mm 355 g199.7 mm 121.1 mm 8.55 mm 310 g199 mm 129 mm 8.2 mm 305 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Huawei MatePad T8
PowerVR GE8320, Helio MT8768, 16 GB eMMC Flash
347 (311min - 360max) MBit/s ∼100%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
Mali-G52 MP2, MT8168, 32 GB eMMC Flash
330 (313min - 336max) MBit/s ∼95% -5%
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020
Mali-G52 MP2, MT8168, 32 GB eMMC Flash
330 (313min - 336max) MBit/s ∼95% -5%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
PowerVR GE8320, Helio A22 MT6762M, 32 GB eMMC Flash
294 (256min - 307max) MBit/s ∼85% -15%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
Adreno 504, SD 429, 32 GB eMMC Flash
101 (86min - 107max) MBit/s ∼29% -71%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Huawei MatePad T8
PowerVR GE8320, Helio MT8768, 16 GB eMMC Flash
350 (174min - 394max) MBit/s ∼100%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
Mali-G52 MP2, MT8168, 32 GB eMMC Flash
348 (175min - 353max) MBit/s ∼99% -1%
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020
Mali-G52 MP2, MT8168, 32 GB eMMC Flash
348 (175min - 353max) MBit/s ∼99% -1%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
PowerVR GE8320, Helio A22 MT6762M, 32 GB eMMC Flash
271 (183min - 335max) MBit/s ∼77% -23%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
Adreno 504, SD 429, 32 GB eMMC Flash
115 (109min - 121max) MBit/s ∼33% -67%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø345 (311-360)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø344 (174-394)
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Huawei MatePad T8
GPS Huawei MatePad T8
GPS Huawei MatePad T8
GPS Huawei MatePad T8
GPS Huawei MatePad T8
GPS Huawei MatePad T8
5-MP camera
5-MP camera
4X Zoom (max)
4X Zoom (max)

Beeldvergelijking

Bekijk een scène en navigeer binnen het eerste beeld. Eén klik wijzigt het zoomniveau. Eén klik op het ingezoomde beeld opent het origineel in een nieuw venster. Het eerste beeld toont de verschaalde foto van het testtoestel.

Wide-angleLow-light photography4X zoomWide-angle
klik om beelden te laden
ColorChecker
29.1 ∆E
54.1 ∆E
39.6 ∆E
34.8 ∆E
45.1 ∆E
61.9 ∆E
52.9 ∆E
35.7 ∆E
42.2 ∆E
28 ∆E
64.5 ∆E
63.3 ∆E
31.1 ∆E
47.7 ∆E
36.9 ∆E
76.3 ∆E
43.3 ∆E
41.9 ∆E
93 ∆E
71 ∆E
52 ∆E
37 ∆E
23.9 ∆E
13.3 ∆E
ColorChecker Huawei MatePad T8: 46.61 ∆E min: 13.35 - max: 92.97 ∆E
ColorChecker
6.3 ∆E
4.2 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
2.7 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
4.5 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
6 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
3.7 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
4.2 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
0.9 ∆E
4.5 ∆E
1.1 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
4.5 ∆E
4.2 ∆E
7.4 ∆E
11.7 ∆E
10.5 ∆E
ColorChecker Huawei MatePad T8: 5.33 ∆E min: 0.9 - max: 11.74 ∆E
314
cd/m²
322
cd/m²
331
cd/m²
317
cd/m²
331
cd/m²
343
cd/m²
318
cd/m²
318
cd/m²
336
cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 343 cd/m² Gemiddelde: 325.6 cd/m² Minimum: 2.75 cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling: 92 %
Helderheid in Batterij-modus: 331 cd/m²
Contrast: 2069:1 (Zwart: 0.16 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.1 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.8
ΔE Greyscale 3.9 | 0.64-98 Ø6
85.1% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.31
Huawei MatePad T8
LCD, 1280x800, 8
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020
IPS, 1280x800, 8
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
IPS, 1280x800, 8
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
IPS, 1280x800, 8
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
TFT, 1280x800, 8
Screen
10%
12%
-7%
-33%
Brightness middle
331
490
48%
501
51%
379
15%
377
14%
Brightness
326
447
37%
463
42%
346
6%
372
14%
Brightness Distribution
92
88
-4%
85
-8%
88
-4%
87
-5%
Black Level *
0.16
0.23
-44%
0.25
-56%
0.21
-31%
0.29
-81%
Contrast
2069
2130
3%
2004
-3%
1805
-13%
1300
-37%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.1
4
2%
3.6
12%
3.8
7%
6.1
-49%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
7.2
8.3
-15%
8.4
-17%
7.5
-4%
10.9
-51%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
3.9
2
49%
1
74%
5
-28%
6.6
-69%
Gamma
2.31 95%
2.29 96%
2.17 101%
2.23 99%
2.13 103%
CCT
7355 88%
6618 98%
6473 100%
7514 87%
7861 83%

* ... kleiner is beter

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Om de schermhelderheid te verlagen schakelen sommige laptops het backlight erg snel aan en uit. Dit gebeurt aan een dergelijk hoge frequentie dat het niet zichtbaar is voor het menselijk oog. Als de frequentie te laag is kunnen personen met gevoelige ogen geïrriteerd geraken, hoofdpijn krijgen en zelfs flickering waarnemen.
Screen flickering / PWM niet waargenomen

Ter vergelijking: 51 % van alle geteste toestellen maakten geen gebruik van PWM om de schermhelderheid te verlagen. Als het wel werd gebruikt, werd een gemiddelde van 17567 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 2500000) Hz waargenomen.

Responstijd Scherm

De responstijden van het scherm tonen hoe snel het scherm in staat is om van één kleur naar de andere te veranderen. Trage responstijden kunnen aanleiding geven tot 'nabeelden' rond bewegende objecten of het scherm wazig maken (blur). Vooral spelers van snelle 3D-games hebben baat bij een scherm met snelle responstijden.
       Responstijd Zwart naar Wit
31.6 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd↗ 18.8 ms stijging
↘ 12.8 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde trage responstijden in onze tests en is misschien te traag voor games.
Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.8 (minimum) tot 240 (maximum) ms. » 81 % van alle toestellen zijn beter.
Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd slechter is dan het gemiddelde (24.4 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.
       Responstijd 50% Grijs naar 80% Grijs
47.2 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd↗ 21.2 ms stijging
↘ 26 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde trage responstijden in onze tests en is misschien te traag voor games.
Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.8 (minimum) tot 636 (maximum) ms. » 76 % van alle toestellen zijn beter.
Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd slechter is dan het gemiddelde (38.8 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.
Geekbench 5.1 / 5.2
Vulkan Score 5.1
Average of class Tablet (623 - 4654, n=4)
2438 Points ∼2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
Points ∼0%
OpenCL Score 5.1
Average of class Tablet (138 - 5353, n=5)
2292 Points ∼2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
138 Points ∼0%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Average of class Tablet (498 - 4712, n=21)
1979 Points ∼16% +297%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
566 Points ∼5% +14%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
500 Points ∼4% 0%
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020
499 Points ∼4% 0%
Huawei MatePad T8
498 Points ∼4%
Average Mediatek MT8768
498 Points ∼4% 0%
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Average of class Tablet (135 - 1127, n=21)
590 Points ∼36% +337%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
168 Points ∼10% +24%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
144 Points ∼9% +7%
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020
141 Points ∼9% +4%
Huawei MatePad T8
135 Points ∼8%
Average Mediatek MT8768
135 Points ∼8% 0%
Geekbench 4.4
Compute RenderScript Score
Average of class Tablet (840 - 43802, n=45)
5745 Points ∼13% +104%
Huawei MatePad T8
2814 Points ∼6%
Average Mediatek MT8768
2814 Points ∼6% 0%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
1733 Points ∼4% -38%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Average of class Tablet (1106 - 18041, n=62)
4764 Points ∼8% +27%
Huawei MatePad T8
3745 Points ∼6%
Average Mediatek MT8768
3745 Points ∼6% 0%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
2476 Points ∼4% -34%
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Average of class Tablet (429 - 5002, n=62)
1670 Points ∼25% +112%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
833 Points ∼12% +6%
Huawei MatePad T8
789 Points ∼12%
Average Mediatek MT8768
789 Points ∼12% 0%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score
Huawei MatePad T8
4964 Points ∼32%
Average Mediatek MT8768
4964 Points ∼32% 0%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
4946 Points ∼32% 0%
Average of class Tablet (4267 - 12603, n=60)
4914 Points ∼32% -1%
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020
4509 Points ∼29% -9%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
4454 Points ∼29% -10%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
4267 Points ∼28% -14%
Work performance score
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
7019 Points ∼35% +5%
Huawei MatePad T8
6694 Points ∼33%
Average Mediatek MT8768
6694 Points ∼33% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
5986 Points ∼30% -11%
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020
5667 Points ∼28% -15%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
5620 Points ∼28% -16%
Average of class Tablet (1873 - 14982, n=96)
5329 Points ∼27% -20%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics
Average of class Tablet (1152 - 3658, n=20)
2346 Points ∼58% +104%
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020
1833 Points ∼45% +59%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
1823 Points ∼45% +58%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
1786 Points ∼44% +55%
Huawei MatePad T8
1152 Points ∼28%
Average Mediatek MT8768
1152 Points ∼28% 0%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
Points ∼0% -100%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics
Average of class Tablet (400 - 8768, n=20)
2120 Points ∼24% +427%
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020
607 Points ∼7% +51%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
606 Points ∼7% +51%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
460 Points ∼5% +14%
Huawei MatePad T8
402 Points ∼5%
Average Mediatek MT8768
402 Points ∼5% 0%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
Points ∼0% -100%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited
Average of class Tablet (469 - 6292, n=20)
1904 Points ∼28% +306%
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020
713 Points ∼11% +52%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
712 Points ∼11% +52%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
550 Points ∼8% +17%
Huawei MatePad T8
469 Points ∼7%
Average Mediatek MT8768
469 Points ∼7% 0%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
Points ∼0% -100%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Huawei MatePad T8
2101 Points ∼26%
Average Mediatek MT8768
2101 Points ∼26% 0%
Average of class Tablet (650 - 4756, n=61)
1950 Points ∼24% -7%
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020
1277 Points ∼16% -39%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
1265 Points ∼16% -40%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
1155 Points ∼14% -45%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
939 Points ∼12% -55%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Average of class Tablet (99 - 9893, n=61)
2021 Points ∼20% +315%
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020
563 Points ∼6% +16%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
562 Points ∼6% +15%
Huawei MatePad T8
487 Points ∼5%
Average Mediatek MT8768
487 Points ∼5% 0%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
253 Points ∼3% -48%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
210 Points ∼2% -57%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Average of class Tablet (129 - 7701, n=61)
1787 Points ∼22% +208%
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020
643 Points ∼8% +11%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
641 Points ∼8% +10%
Huawei MatePad T8
581 Points ∼7%
Average Mediatek MT8768
581 Points ∼7% 0%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
302 Points ∼4% -48%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
257 Points ∼3% -56%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics
Average of class Tablet (739 - 4702, n=67)
1823 Points ∼32% +60%
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020
1280 Points ∼22% +13%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
1268 Points ∼22% +12%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
1145 Points ∼20% +1%
Huawei MatePad T8
1136 Points ∼20%
Average Mediatek MT8768
1136 Points ∼20% 0%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
943 Points ∼16% -17%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics
Average of class Tablet (165 - 28751, n=67)
3186 Points ∼11% +316%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
893 Points ∼3% +17%
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020
892 Points ∼3% +17%
Huawei MatePad T8
765 Points ∼3%
Average Mediatek MT8768
765 Points ∼3% 0%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
458 Points ∼2% -40%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
336 Points ∼1% -56%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited
Average of class Tablet (207 - 13454, n=67)
2237 Points ∼17% +177%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
956 Points ∼7% +18%
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020
956 Points ∼7% +18%
Huawei MatePad T8
809 Points ∼6%
Average Mediatek MT8768
809 Points ∼6% 0%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
517 Points ∼4% -36%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
428 Points ∼3% -47%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics
Average of class Tablet (729 - 4201, n=77)
1832 Points ∼35% +63%
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020
1243 Points ∼24% +10%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
1233 Points ∼24% +10%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
1188 Points ∼23% +6%
Huawei MatePad T8
1126 Points ∼22%
Average Mediatek MT8768
1126 Points ∼22% 0%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
903 Points ∼17% -20%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
Average of class Tablet (55 - 8894, n=77)
1603 Points ∼18% +298%
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020
573 Points ∼6% +42%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
570 Points ∼6% +41%
Huawei MatePad T8
403 Points ∼4%
Average Mediatek MT8768
403 Points ∼4% 0%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
233 Points ∼3% -42%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
153 Points ∼2% -62%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
Average of class Tablet (70 - 7098, n=79)
1481 Points ∼7% +214%
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020
651 Points ∼3% +38%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
647 Points ∼3% +37%
Huawei MatePad T8
471 Points ∼2%
Average Mediatek MT8768
471 Points ∼2% 0%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
279 Points ∼1% -41%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
190 Points ∼1% -60%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics
Average of class Tablet (56 - 4482, n=80)
1716 Points ∼33% +56%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
1228 Points ∼23% +11%
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020
1228 Points ∼23% +11%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
1178 Points ∼22% +7%
Huawei MatePad T8
1102 Points ∼21%
Average Mediatek MT8768
1102 Points ∼21% 0%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
903 Points ∼17% -18%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics
Average of class Tablet (42 - 14283, n=80)
2291 Points ∼16% +281%
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020
901 Points ∼6% +50%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
898 Points ∼6% +49%
Huawei MatePad T8
602 Points ∼4%
Average Mediatek MT8768
602 Points ∼4% 0%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
427 Points ∼3% -29%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
364 Points ∼3% -40%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0
Average of class Tablet (53 - 9238, n=81)
1838 Points ∼19% +168%
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020
958 Points ∼10% +39%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
955 Points ∼10% +39%
Huawei MatePad T8
687 Points ∼7%
Average Mediatek MT8768
687 Points ∼7% 0%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
484 Points ∼5% -30%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
428 Points ∼4% -38%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
15709 Points ∼18% +21%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
15151 Points ∼18% +17%
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020
14979 Points ∼17% +15%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
14822 Points ∼17% +14%
Average of class Tablet (3675 - 51436, n=174)
14462 Points ∼17% +12%
Huawei MatePad T8
12969 Points ∼15%
Average Mediatek MT8768
12969 Points ∼15% 0%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score
Average of class Tablet (2109 - 221941, n=174)
25191 Points ∼5% +106%
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020
13426 Points ∼2% +10%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
13333 Points ∼2% +9%
Huawei MatePad T8
12210 Points ∼2%
Average Mediatek MT8768
12210 Points ∼2% 0%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
7658 Points ∼1% -37%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
6897 Points ∼1% -44%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score
Average of class Tablet (2411 - 110846, n=175)
18873 Points ∼8% +54%
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020
13743 Points ∼6% +12%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
13698 Points ∼6% +12%
Huawei MatePad T8
12265 Points ∼5%
Average Mediatek MT8768
12265 Points ∼5% 0%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
8580 Points ∼3% -30%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
7879 Points ∼3% -36%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
Average of class Tablet (1 - 451, n=196)
37.1 fps ∼0% +86%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
21 fps ∼0% +5%
Huawei MatePad T8
20 fps ∼0%
Average Mediatek MT8768
20 fps ∼0% 0%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
14 fps ∼0% -30%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
11 fps ∼0% -45%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
33 fps ∼1% +10%
Huawei MatePad T8
30 fps ∼1%
Average Mediatek MT8768
30 fps ∼1% 0%
Average of class Tablet (1.1 - 120, n=200)
23.9 fps ∼1% -20%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
21 fps ∼1% -30%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
17 fps ∼1% -43%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL
Average of class Tablet (1.6 - 220, n=130)
25.3 fps ∼4% +153%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
12 fps ∼2% +20%
Huawei MatePad T8
10 fps ∼2%
Average Mediatek MT8768
10 fps ∼2% 0%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
6.6 fps ∼1% -34%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
4.8 fps ∼1% -52%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
24 fps ∼7% +26%
Huawei MatePad T8
19 fps ∼5%
Average Mediatek MT8768
19 fps ∼5% 0%
Average of class Tablet (1.9 - 110, n=136)
17.5 fps ∼5% -8%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
12 fps ∼3% -37%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
9.5 fps ∼3% -50%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Average of class Tablet (1.7 - 173, n=82)
22.7 fps ∼0% +220%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
7.6 fps ∼0% +7%
Huawei MatePad T8
7.1 fps ∼0%
Average Mediatek MT8768
7.1 fps ∼0% 0%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
4.3 fps ∼0% -39%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
3.2 fps ∼0% -55%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
17 fps ∼0% +31%
Average of class Tablet (2.7 - 95, n=82)
15.1 fps ∼0% +16%
Huawei MatePad T8
13 fps ∼0%
Average Mediatek MT8768
13 fps ∼0% 0%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
8.5 fps ∼0% -35%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
6.9 fps ∼0% -47%
GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Average of class Tablet (1.7 - 49, n=32)
10.3 fps ∼7% +124%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
5.5 fps ∼4% +20%
Huawei MatePad T8
4.6 fps ∼3%
Average Mediatek MT8768
4.6 fps ∼3% 0%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
2.9 fps ∼2% -37%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
2 fps ∼1% -57%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Average of class Tablet (0.8 - 51.1, n=32)
9.95 fps ∼4% +563%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
1.8 fps ∼1% +20%
Huawei MatePad T8
1.5 fps ∼1%
Average Mediatek MT8768
1.5 fps ∼1% 0%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
0.85 fps ∼0% -43%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
0.8 fps ∼0% -47%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Average of class Tablet (2.7 - 58, n=32)
15.5 fps ∼8% +104%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
9.7 fps ∼5% +28%
Huawei MatePad T8
7.6 fps ∼4%
Average Mediatek MT8768
7.6 fps ∼4% 0%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
4.6 fps ∼2% -39%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
3.1 fps ∼2% -59%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Average of class Tablet (1.7 - 134, n=32)
26.6 fps ∼5% +582%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
5.1 fps ∼1% +31%
Huawei MatePad T8
3.9 fps ∼1%
Average Mediatek MT8768
3.9 fps ∼1% 0%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
2.3 fps ∼0% -41%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
1.7 fps ∼0% -56%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen
Average of class Tablet (1.8 - 107, n=58)
16.3 fps ∼4% +167%
Huawei MatePad T8
6.1 fps ∼1%
Average Mediatek MT8768
6.1 fps ∼1% 0%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
4.8 fps ∼1% -21%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
1.9 fps ∼0% -69%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
1.8 fps ∼0% -70%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen
Average of class Tablet (1.7 - 47, n=58)
10.2 fps ∼4% +92%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
9.2 fps ∼3% +74%
Huawei MatePad T8
5.3 fps ∼2%
Average Mediatek MT8768
5.3 fps ∼2% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
3.8 fps ∼1% -28%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
3.6 fps ∼1% -32%
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet (78450 - 751846, n=16)
324526 Points ∼43% +255%
Huawei MatePad T8
91467 Points ∼12%
Average Mediatek MT8768
91467 Points ∼12% 0%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
90442 Points ∼12% -1%
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020
90422 Points ∼12% -1%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
79125 Points ∼11% -13%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
78450 Points ∼10% -14%
BaseMark OS II
Web
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
809 Points ∼40% +6%
Average of class Tablet (9 - 2034, n=123)
772 Points ∼38% +1%
Huawei MatePad T8
762 Points ∼37%
Average Mediatek MT8768
762 Points ∼37% 0%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
756 Points ∼37% -1%
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020
731 Points ∼36% -4%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
730 Points ∼36% -4%
Graphics
Average of class Tablet (98 - 28853, n=124)
2440 Points ∼8% +172%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
947 Points ∼3% +5%
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020
946 Points ∼3% +5%
Huawei MatePad T8
898 Points ∼3%
Average Mediatek MT8768
898 Points ∼3% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
487 Points ∼2% -46%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
472 Points ∼2% -47%
Memory
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020
1416 Points ∼16% +4%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
1406 Points ∼16% +3%
Huawei MatePad T8
1365 Points ∼15%
Average Mediatek MT8768
1365 Points ∼15% 0%
Average of class Tablet (56 - 6751, n=124)
1304 Points ∼15% -4%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
1258 Points ∼14% -8%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
1151 Points ∼13% -16%
System
Average of class Tablet (482 - 16467, n=124)
2712 Points ∼16% +4%
Huawei MatePad T8
2598 Points ∼16%
Average Mediatek MT8768
2598 Points ∼16% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
1945 Points ∼12% -25%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
1802 Points ∼11% -31%
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020
1788 Points ∼11% -31%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
1539 Points ∼9% -41%
Overall
Average of class Tablet (150 - 8450, n=123)
1426 Points ∼17% +12%
Huawei MatePad T8
1269 Points ∼15%
Average Mediatek MT8768
1269 Points ∼15% 0%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
1150 Points ∼14% -9%
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020
1150 Points ∼14% -9%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
987 Points ∼12% -22%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
891 Points ∼11% -30%

Legende

 
Huawei MatePad T8 Mediatek MT8768, PowerVR GE8320, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020 MediaTek MT8168, ARM Mali-G52 MP1, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020 MediaTek MT8168, ARM Mali-G52 MP1, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Lenovo Tab M8 HD Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290 Qualcomm Snapdragon 429, Qualcomm Adreno 504, 32 GB eMMC Flash
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet (14 - 126, n=19)
61.7 Points ∼100% +342%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290 (Chrome 79)
16.087 Points ∼26% +15%
Average Mediatek MT8768
14 Points ∼23% 0%
Huawei MatePad T8 (Huawei Browser 10.1.4 )
13.964 Points ∼23%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
Points ∼0% -100%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet (10.9 - 279, n=107)
61.3 Points ∼100% +167%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD (Chrome 79)
25.645 Points ∼42% +12%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290 (Chrome 79)
25.067 Points ∼41% +9%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020 (Silk Browser)
23.989 Points ∼39% +4%
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020 (Silk Browser)
23.559 Points ∼38% +3%
Average Mediatek MT8768
23 Points ∼38% 0%
Huawei MatePad T8 (Huawei Browser 10.1.4 )
22.969 Points ∼37%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Average of class Tablet (13 - 182, n=42)
75.9 Points ∼100% +145%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD (Chrome 79)
34 Points ∼45% +10%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290 (Chrome 79)
32 Points ∼42% +3%
Huawei MatePad T8 (Huawei Browser 10.1.4 )
31 Points ∼41%
Average Mediatek MT8768
31 Points ∼41% 0%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020 (Silk Browser)
30 Points ∼40% -3%
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020 (Silk Browser)
30 Points ∼40% -3%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Tablet (5.68 - 139, n=28)
55 runs/min ∼100% +312%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD (Chrome 79)
15.49 runs/min ∼28% +16%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290 (Chrome 79)
13.5 runs/min ∼25% +1%
Huawei MatePad T8 (Huawei Browser 10.1.4 )
13.34 runs/min ∼24%
Average Mediatek MT8768
13.3 runs/min ∼24% 0%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020 (Silk Browser)
12.2 runs/min ∼22% -9%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet (1238 - 45734, n=192)
7827 Points ∼100% +86%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD (Chrome 79)
4378 Points ∼56% +4%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290 (Chrome 79)
4297 Points ∼55% +2%
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020 (Silk Browser)
4222 Points ∼54% 0%
Huawei MatePad T8 (Huawei Browser 10.1.4 )
4215 Points ∼54%
Average Mediatek MT8768
4215 Points ∼54% 0%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020 (Silk Browser)
4115 Points ∼53% -2%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Huawei MatePad T8 (Huawei Browser 10.1.4 )
11258.2 ms * ∼100%
Average Mediatek MT8768
11258 ms * ∼100% -0%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020 (Silk Browser)
11253.8 ms * ∼100% -0%
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020 (Silk Browser)
11102.9 ms * ∼99% +1%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD (Chrome 79)
10893.8 ms * ∼97% +3%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290 (Chrome 79)
10654.6 ms * ∼95% +5%
Average of class Tablet (603 - 43092, n=204)
8807 ms * ∼78% +22%

* ... kleiner is beter

Huawei MatePad T8Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020Amazon Fire HD 8 2020Lenovo Tab M8 HDSamsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290Average 16 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Tablet
AndroBench 3-5
15%
16%
12%
17%
-41%
-29%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
62.43 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
61.54 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-1%
62.04 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-1%
64.25 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
3%
69.95 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
12%
40 (6.38 - 65.8, n=136)
-36%
50 (14 - 73.8, n=71)
-20%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
82.91 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
84.91 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
2%
84.13 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
1%
83.83 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
1%
87.13 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
5%
59.2 (8.1 - 87.7, n=136)
-29%
67.9 (17.6 - 87.7, n=71)
-18%
Random Write 4KB
14.63
15.62
7%
15.72
7%
15.84
8%
16.89
15%
8.08 (0.49 - 44.9, n=254)
-45%
11.5 (0.13 - 262, n=223)
-21%
Random Read 4KB
57.46
69.06
20%
67.61
18%
77.44
35%
57.77
1%
21.7 (2.49 - 62.1, n=254)
-62%
25.9 (1.04 - 230, n=223)
-55%
Sequential Write 256KB
67.43
100.19
49%
103.95
54%
79.55
18%
108.54
61%
43.1 (8.74 - 106, n=254)
-36%
56.5 (2.04 - 732, n=223)
-16%
Sequential Read 256KB
274.1
314.2
15%
315.01
15%
297.09
8%
291.87
6%
165 (9.66 - 294, n=254)
-40%
149 (6.75 - 1789, n=223)
-46%
PUBG Mobile
0102030Tooltip
; Smooth: Ø24.5 (19-27)
; Smooth: Ø24.5 (17-26)
Real Racing 3
010203040Tooltip
: Ø23.7 (17-32)
Max. Belasting
 26.6 °C26.1 °C27.2 °C 
 26.6 °C25.9 °C27.8 °C 
 26.2 °C25.8 °C27.3 °C 
Maximum: 27.8 °C
Gemiddelde: 26.6 °C
26.2 °C26.3 °C26.6 °C
25.7 °C26.5 °C26.6 °C
25.5 °C26 °C26.7 °C
Maximum: 26.7 °C
Gemiddelde: 26.2 °C
Stroomadapter (max.)  26.9 °C | Kamertemperatuur 21.8 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 26.6 °C / 80 F, compared to the average of 30.6 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 27.8 °C / 82 F, compared to the average of 34.6 °C / 94 F, ranging from 22.2 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 26.7 °C / 80 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.9 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 30.6 °C / 87 F.
Getest: de Huawei MatePad T8
Getest: de Huawei MatePad T8
Getest: de Huawei MatePad T8
Getest: de Huawei MatePad T8
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2036.947.6252945.53121.941.34022475029.948.4632249.48019.349.110016.352.91251452.316016.954.220014.955.825014.156.33151057.3400115950011.763.963010.968.280011.972.610001173.9125010.277.9160011.477.1200012.879.4250012.984.5315012.587.240001388500013.184.7630013.481.6800015.777.11000013.574125001469.41600013.765.1SPL24.894.6N0.695.3median 13median 72.6Delta1.11129.83325.226.621.626.924.717.929.625.522.523.925.126.320.125.819.926.920.836.917.641.117.647.417.450.316.153.613.95514.559.216.161.314.56714.471.513.672.113.973.514.576.114.477.814.877.614.776.814.873.614.971.915.170.91562.615.147.426.9860.959.1median 14.9median 62.61.512.6hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseHuawei MatePad T8Lenovo Tab M8 HD
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Huawei MatePad T8 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (94.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.8% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (2.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.6% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 9.8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 29% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 23% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 70% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Lenovo Tab M8 HD audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.9% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 12.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (27.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 79% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 15% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 83% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 12% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Stroomgebruik
Uit / Standbydarklight 0.01 / 0.17 Watt
Inactiefdarkmidlight 0.68 / 2.24 / 2.27 Watt
Belasting midlight 3.06 / 4.45 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Huawei MatePad T8
5100 mAh
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020
4850 mAh
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
4850 mAh
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
5100 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
5100 mAh
Power Consumption
-19%
-23%
10%
-8%
Idle Minimum *
0.68
0.74
-9%
0.72
-6%
0.66
3%
0.62
9%
Idle Average *
2.24
2.81
-25%
2.97
-33%
2.15
4%
2.68
-20%
Idle Maximum *
2.27
2.83
-25%
2.99
-32%
2.18
4%
2.7
-19%
Load Average *
3.06
3.73
-22%
4.02
-31%
2.48
19%
3.61
-18%
Load Maximum *
4.45
4.97
-12%
5.1
-15%
3.49
22%
4
10%

* ... kleiner is beter

Batterijduur
Inactief (zonder WLAN, minimale helderheid)
39h 53min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
15h 49min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
18h 57min
Belast (maximale helderheid)
5h 59min
Huawei MatePad T8
5100 mAh
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020
4850 mAh
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
4850 mAh
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
5100 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
5100 mAh
Batterijduur
-8%
-8%
30%
-1%
Reader / Idle
2393
2661
11%
3581
50%
3132
31%
H.264
1137
949
-17%
1696
49%
934
-18%
WiFi v1.3
949
869
-8%
902
-5%
1124
18%
831
-12%
Load
359
286
-20%
374
4%
342
-5%

Pro

+ scherm met hoog contrast
+ snelle Wi-Fi
+ GPS-module
+ geweldige batterijduur

Contra

- lage helderheid
- geen omgevingslichtsensor
- lage resolutie
- slechts 16/32 GB
- 2 GB RAM
- microUSB-poort
- lange oplaadtijden
- geen GMS

Conclusie voor de MatePad T8 - Huawei’s compenseert niet voor het verlies van Google Play services

Getest: de Huawei MatePad T8 tablet. Testtoestel voorzien door: notebooksbilliger.de
Getest: de Huawei MatePad T8 tablet. Testtoestel voorzien door: notebooksbilliger.de

Dit is de verkorte versie van het originele artikel. Het volledige, Engelse testrapport vind je hier.

Als het gaat om prestaties, bouwkwaliteit en batterijduur, is de T8 erg competitief. De Wi-Fi-module van de Huawei-tablet behaalt de beste resultaten in onze Wi-Fi-test. Voor een kleine meerprijs van 20 euro kunnen kopers een versie met een LTE-modem krijgen.

Het IPS-paneel heeft relatief stabiele kijkhoeken en de kleurweergave is op een goed niveau voor een tablet van 100 euro. Het scherm is op zonnige dagen echter niet helder genoeg voor gebruik buitenshuis. Of een toestel in 2020 al dan niet met 2 GB RAM en 16 GB eMMC-geheugen moet worden geleverd, staat ter discussie. Maar naar onze mening is het feit dat geen enkel toestel met een microUSB-poort en een oplader van 5 Watt zou mogen komen, niet langer discutabel.

Vanwege de situatie met Google is het erg moeilijk om een conclusie te trekken over de laaggeprijsde MatePad T8. Je kan probleemloos YouTube-video's bekijken, op het internet surfen of PDF-bestanden lezen met de T8. Applicaties waarvoor het gebruik van Google Play-services niet nodig is, werken goed. Als je favoriete applicaties echter afhankelijk zijn van Google Play-services, heb je pech. Bovendien biedt Huawei's AppGallery een niet erg brede selectie aan applicaties. 

Huawei compenseert het verlies dat veel gebruikers zullen ervaren niet: namelijk het feit dat de instap-tablet geen ondersteuning biedt voor Google Play-services. De T8 heeft geen begeerlijke features die hem onderscheiden van de massa.

Huawei MatePad T8 - 18-09-2020 v7
Marcus Herbrich

Behuizing
78 / 98 → 79%
Toetsenbord
67 / 80 → 84%
Aanwijsapparaat
84%
Aansluitmogelijkheden
38 / 70 → 54%
Gewicht
86 / 40-88 → 96%
Batterij
91%
Beeldscherm
82%
Gaming-performance
8 / 78 → 11%
Applicatie-performance
43 / 92 → 47%
Temperatuur
96%
Luidheid
100%
Audio
75 / 91 → 83%
Camera
40 / 85 → 47%
Gemiddelde
68%
81%
Tablet - Gewogen Gemiddelde

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Overzichten en testrapporten over laptops en mobieltjes > Testrapporten > Kort testrapport Huawei MatePad T8 Tablet: Is de tablet van 99 euro zijn prijs waard
Marcus Herbrich, 2020-09-24 (Update: 2020-09-24)