Notebookcheck

Kort testrapport Amazon Fire HD 8 (2020): Geüpdatete Fire Tablet biedt aanzienlijk hogere prestaties

Met 32GB opslagruimte in het basismodel. Na twee jaar geeft Amazon de Fire HD 8 een update die niet alleen de hardware vernieuwt, maar ook het ontwerp lichtjes aanpast. Het resultaat is dat gebruikers kunnen profiteren van een iets slanker ontwerp en een soepelere systeembediening. Ons testrapport laat zien wat de nieuwe Amazon Fire HD 8 (2020) nog meer te bieden heeft.
Mike Wobker, 👁 Daniel Schmidt, Andrea Grüblinger,
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020 (Fire Serie)
Processor
MediaTek MT8168 4 x 2 GHz, Cortex-A53
Grafische kaart
ARM Mali-G52 MP1
Geheugen
2048 MB 
Beeldscherm
8 inch 16:10, 1280 x 800 pixel 189 PPI, kapazitiv, IPS, glimmend: ja, 60 Hz
Opslag
32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB 
, 26 GB beschikbaar
Verbindingen
1 USB 2.0, Audio Verbindingen: 3.5-mm audio-poort, Card Reader: microSD (FAT, FAT32, tot 1 TB), Brightness Sensor, Sensoren: Accelerometer
Netwerkmogelijkheden
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.0
Afmetingen
hoogte x breedte x diepte (in mm): 9.7 x 202 x 137
Batterij
4850 mAh Lithium-Ion, Batterijduur: 12 h
Besturingssysteem
Android 9.0 Pie
Camera
Primary Camera: 2 MPix 1600x1200 Resolution, Videos up to [email protected]
Secondary Camera: 2 MPix 1600x1200 resolutie, video's tot [email protected]
Bijkomende functionaliteiten
Luidsprekers: 2 Speakers, Toetsenbord: onscreen, Toetsenbordverlichting: ja, USB plug-in laadkabel, USB Type-C-naar-Type-A-kabel, Fire OS 7.3.1, 12 Maanden Garantie, fanless
Gewicht
355 g, Voeding: 63 g
Prijs
100 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Evaluatie
Datum
Model
Gewicht
Hoogte
Formaat
Resolutie
Best Price
81 %
08-2020
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
MT8168, Mali-G52 MP2
355 g9.7 mm8"1280x800
77 %
11-2018
Amazon Fire HD 8 2018
MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz, Mali-T720
363 g9.7 mm8"1280x800
81 %
02-2020
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320
305 g8.2 mm8"1280x800
80 %
01-2020
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
SD 429, Adreno 504
345 g8 mm8"1280x800
79 %
03-2019
Alldocube M8 T801
MT6797X, Mali-T880 MP4
345 g8.48 mm8"1920x1200

Formaat Vergelijking

215 mm 128 mm 9.7 mm 363 g215 mm 122.9 mm 8.48 mm 345 g210 mm 124.4 mm 8 mm 345 g202 mm 137 mm 9.7 mm 355 g199 mm 129 mm 8.2 mm 305 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
Mali-G52 MP2, MT8168, 32 GB eMMC Flash
330 (313min - 336max) MBit/s ∼100%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
PowerVR GE8320, Helio A22 MT6762M, 32 GB eMMC Flash
294 (256min - 307max) MBit/s ∼89% -11%
Alldocube M8 T801
Mali-T880 MP4, MT6797X, 32 GB eMMC Flash
235 MBit/s ∼71% -29%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
Adreno 504, SD 429, 32 GB eMMC Flash
101 (86min - 107max) MBit/s ∼31% -69%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2018
Mali-T720, MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz, 16 GB eMMC Flash
99.9 (90min - 106max) MBit/s ∼30% -70%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
Mali-G52 MP2, MT8168, 32 GB eMMC Flash
348 (175min - 353max) MBit/s ∼100%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
PowerVR GE8320, Helio A22 MT6762M, 32 GB eMMC Flash
271 (183min - 335max) MBit/s ∼78% -22%
Alldocube M8 T801
Mali-T880 MP4, MT6797X, 32 GB eMMC Flash
195 MBit/s ∼56% -44%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
Adreno 504, SD 429, 32 GB eMMC Flash
115 (109min - 121max) MBit/s ∼33% -67%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2018
Mali-T720, MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz, 16 GB eMMC Flash
98.4 (82min - 110max) MBit/s ∼28% -72%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø330 (313-336)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø342 (175-353)

Beeldvergelijking

Bekijk een scène en navigeer binnen het eerste beeld. Eén klik wijzigt het zoomniveau. Eén klik op het ingezoomde beeld opent het origineel in een nieuw venster. Het eerste beeld toont de verschaalde foto van het testtoestel.

HauptkameraPanoramaZoom (Fire HD 8: 2-fach, Rest: 5-fach)LowLight
ColorChecker
29.1 ∆E
54.1 ∆E
39.9 ∆E
37.3 ∆E
44.5 ∆E
65.1 ∆E
53.8 ∆E
35.6 ∆E
42.9 ∆E
27.4 ∆E
66.3 ∆E
64.7 ∆E
30.8 ∆E
49.8 ∆E
36.8 ∆E
77.1 ∆E
42.7 ∆E
45.9 ∆E
92.2 ∆E
70.7 ∆E
52.2 ∆E
37.1 ∆E
24 ∆E
13.7 ∆E
ColorChecker Amazon Fire HD 8 2020: 47.23 ∆E min: 13.67 - max: 92.16 ∆E
ColorChecker
6.1 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
3.5 ∆E
4 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
2.8 ∆E
4.2 ∆E
4.1 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
0.8 ∆E
3.3 ∆E
2.9 ∆E
4.2 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
8 ∆E
10.2 ∆E
ColorChecker Amazon Fire HD 8 2020: 5.32 ∆E min: 0.85 - max: 10.21 ∆E
445
cd/m²
482
cd/m²
455
cd/m²
427
cd/m²
501
cd/m²
459
cd/m²
454
cd/m²
484
cd/m²
456
cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 501 cd/m² Gemiddelde: 462.6 cd/m² Minimum: 4.48 cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling: 85 %
Helderheid in Batterij-modus: 501 cd/m²
Contrast: 2004:1 (Zwart: 0.25 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.6 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.8
ΔE Greyscale 1 | 0.64-98 Ø6
79.4% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.17
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
IPS, 1280x800, 8
Amazon Fire HD 8 2018
IPS, 1280x800, 8
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
IPS, 1280x800, 8
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
TFT, 1280x800, 8
Alldocube M8 T801
IPS, 1920x1200, 8
Screen
-153%
-54%
-94%
-105%
Brightness middle
501
359
-28%
379
-24%
377
-25%
317.5
-37%
Brightness
463
358
-23%
346
-25%
372
-20%
320
-31%
Brightness Distribution
85
89
5%
88
4%
87
2%
94
11%
Black Level *
0.25
0.85
-240%
0.21
16%
0.29
-16%
0.5
-100%
Contrast
2004
422
-79%
1805
-10%
1300
-35%
635
-68%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
3.6
6.8
-89%
3.8
-6%
6.1
-69%
6.12
-70%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
8.4
17.3
-106%
7.5
11%
10.9
-30%
13.72
-63%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
1
7.6
-660%
5
-400%
6.6
-560%
5.8
-480%
Gamma
2.17 101%
2.19 100%
2.23 99%
2.13 103%
2.12 104%
CCT
6473 100%
7160 91%
7514 87%
7861 83%
7633 85%

* ... kleiner is beter

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Om de schermhelderheid te verlagen schakelen sommige laptops het backlight erg snel aan en uit. Dit gebeurt aan een dergelijk hoge frequentie dat het niet zichtbaar is voor het menselijk oog. Als de frequentie te laag is kunnen personen met gevoelige ogen geïrriteerd geraken, hoofdpijn krijgen en zelfs flickering waarnemen.
Screen flickering / PWM waargenomen 65790 Hz ≤ 6 % helderheid instelling

Het backlight van het scherm flikkert aan 65790 Hz (hoogstwaarschijnlijk met PWM - Pulse-Width Modulation) aan een helderheid van 6 % en lager. Boven deze helderheid zou er geen flickering / PWM mogen optreden.

De frequentie van 65790 Hz is redelijk hoog en de meeste mensen die gevoelig zijn aan flickering zouden dit dus niet mogen waarnemen of geïrriteerde ogen krijgen.

Ter vergelijking: 51 % van alle geteste toestellen maakten geen gebruik van PWM om de schermhelderheid te verlagen. Als het wel werd gebruikt, werd een gemiddelde van 17612 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 2500000) Hz waargenomen.

Responstijd Scherm

De responstijden van het scherm tonen hoe snel het scherm in staat is om van één kleur naar de andere te veranderen. Trage responstijden kunnen aanleiding geven tot 'nabeelden' rond bewegende objecten of het scherm wazig maken (blur). Vooral spelers van snelle 3D-games hebben baat bij een scherm met snelle responstijden.
       Responstijd Zwart naar Wit
27.2 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd↗ 14 ms stijging
↘ 13.2 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde relatief trage responstijden in onze tests en is misschien te traag voor games.
Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.8 (minimum) tot 240 (maximum) ms. » 57 % van alle toestellen zijn beter.
Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd slechter is dan het gemiddelde (24.4 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.
       Responstijd 50% Grijs naar 80% Grijs
47.6 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd↗ 23.6 ms stijging
↘ 24 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde trage responstijden in onze tests en is misschien te traag voor games.
Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.8 (minimum) tot 636 (maximum) ms. » 76 % van alle toestellen zijn beter.
Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd slechter is dan het gemiddelde (38.8 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.
Geekbench 5.1 / 5.2
Vulkan Score 5.1
Average of class Tablet (623 - 4654, n=4)
2438 Points ∼2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
Points ∼0%
OpenCL Score 5.1
Average of class Tablet (138 - 5353, n=5)
2292 Points ∼2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
138 Points ∼0%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Average of class Tablet (498 - 4712, n=18)
1930 Points ∼16% +286%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
566 Points ∼5% +13%
Average MediaTek MT8168 (499 - 504, n=3)
501 Points ∼4% 0%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
500 Points ∼4%
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Average of class Tablet (135 - 1127, n=18)
564 Points ∼35% +292%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
168 Points ∼10% +17%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
144 Points ∼9%
Average MediaTek MT8168 (141 - 144, n=3)
143 Points ∼9% -1%
Geekbench 4.4
Compute RenderScript Score
Average of class Tablet (840 - 43802, n=44)
5664 Points ∼13% +227%
Alldocube M8 T801
2843 Points ∼6% +64%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
1733 Points ∼4%
Average MediaTek MT8168 (1726 - 1733, n=2)
1730 Points ∼4% 0%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Average of class Tablet (1106 - 18041, n=61)
4628 Points ∼8% +87%
Alldocube M8 T801
3590 Points ∼6% +45%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
2476 Points ∼4%
Average MediaTek MT8168 (2463 - 2476, n=2)
2470 Points ∼4% 0%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2018
1751 Points ∼3% -29%
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Average of class Tablet (429 - 5002, n=61)
1624 Points ∼24% +95%
Alldocube M8 T801
1352 Points ∼20% +62%
Average MediaTek MT8168 (833 - 837, n=2)
835 Points ∼12% 0%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
833 Points ∼12%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2018
636 Points ∼9% -24%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
4946 Points ∼32% +11%
Average of class Tablet (4267 - 12466, n=58)
4786 Points ∼31% +7%
Alldocube M8 T801
4695 Points ∼31% +5%
Average MediaTek MT8168 (4454 - 4753, n=3)
4572 Points ∼30% +3%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
4454 Points ∼29%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
4267 Points ∼28% -4%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2018
3130 Points ∼20% -30%
Work performance score
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
7019 Points ∼35% +25%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
5986 Points ∼30% +7%
Alldocube M8 T801
5984 Points ∼30% +6%
Average MediaTek MT8168 (5620 - 6311, n=3)
5866 Points ∼29% +4%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
5620 Points ∼28%
Average of class Tablet (1873 - 13629, n=94)
5212 Points ∼26% -7%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2018
4165 Points ∼21% -26%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics
Average of class Tablet (1152 - 3658, n=18)
2308 Points ∼57% +27%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
1823 Points ∼45%
Average MediaTek MT8168 (1811 - 1833, n=3)
1822 Points ∼45% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
1786 Points ∼44% -2%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
Points ∼0% -100%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics
Average of class Tablet (402 - 8745, n=18)
1846 Points ∼21% +205%
Average MediaTek MT8168 (606 - 613, n=3)
609 Points ∼7% 0%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
606 Points ∼7%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
460 Points ∼5% -24%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
Points ∼0% -100%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited
Average of class Tablet (469 - 6226, n=18)
1739 Points ∼26% +144%
Average MediaTek MT8168 (712 - 719, n=3)
715 Points ∼11% 0%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
712 Points ∼11%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
550 Points ∼8% -23%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
Points ∼0% -100%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Average of class Tablet (650 - 4756, n=58)
1900 Points ∼24% +50%
Alldocube M8 T801
1372 Points ∼17% +8%
Average MediaTek MT8168 (1263 - 1277, n=3)
1268 Points ∼16% 0%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
1265 Points ∼16%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
1155 Points ∼14% -9%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
939 Points ∼12% -26%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2018
716 Points ∼9% -43%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Average of class Tablet (99 - 9453, n=58)
1842 Points ∼19% +228%
Alldocube M8 T801
1108 Points ∼12% +97%
Average MediaTek MT8168 (562 - 564, n=3)
563 Points ∼6% 0%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
562 Points ∼6%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
253 Points ∼3% -55%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
210 Points ∼2% -63%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2018
120 Points ∼1% -79%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Average of class Tablet (129 - 7369, n=58)
1651 Points ∼20% +158%
Alldocube M8 T801
1157 Points ∼14% +80%
Average MediaTek MT8168 (641 - 643, n=3)
642 Points ∼8% 0%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
641 Points ∼8%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
302 Points ∼4% -53%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
257 Points ∼3% -60%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2018
147 Points ∼2% -77%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics
Average of class Tablet (739 - 4702, n=65)
1791 Points ∼31% +41%
Average MediaTek MT8168 (1268 - 1280, n=3)
1273 Points ∼22% 0%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
1268 Points ∼22%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
1145 Points ∼20% -10%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
943 Points ∼16% -26%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2018
739 Points ∼13% -42%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics
Average of class Tablet (165 - 28751, n=65)
3061 Points ∼11% +243%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
893 Points ∼3%
Average MediaTek MT8168 (892 - 893, n=3)
892 Points ∼3% 0%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
458 Points ∼2% -49%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
336 Points ∼1% -62%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2018
202 Points ∼1% -77%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited
Average of class Tablet (207 - 13454, n=65)
2151 Points ∼16% +125%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
956 Points ∼7%
Average MediaTek MT8168 (955 - 956, n=3)
956 Points ∼7% 0%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
517 Points ∼4% -46%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
428 Points ∼3% -55%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2018
241 Points ∼2% -75%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics
Average of class Tablet (729 - 4096, n=74)
1789 Points ∼34% +45%
Alldocube M8 T801
1654 Points ∼32% +34%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
1233 Points ∼24%
Average MediaTek MT8168 (1222 - 1243, n=3)
1233 Points ∼24% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
1188 Points ∼23% -4%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
903 Points ∼17% -27%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2018
855 Points ∼16% -31%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
Average of class Tablet (55 - 8548, n=74)
1476 Points ∼17% +159%
Alldocube M8 T801
995 Points ∼12% +75%
Average MediaTek MT8168 (570 - 574, n=3)
572 Points ∼7% 0%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
570 Points ∼7%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
233 Points ∼3% -59%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
153 Points ∼2% -73%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2018
126 Points ∼1% -78%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
Average of class Tablet (70 - 6850, n=76)
1382 Points ∼7% +114%
Alldocube M8 T801
1092 Points ∼5% +69%
Average MediaTek MT8168 (647 - 651, n=3)
650 Points ∼3% 0%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
647 Points ∼3%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
279 Points ∼1% -57%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
190 Points ∼1% -71%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2018
155 Points ∼1% -76%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics
Average of class Tablet (56 - 4104, n=77)
1668 Points ∼32% +36%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
1228 Points ∼23%
Average MediaTek MT8168 (1225 - 1228, n=3)
1227 Points ∼23% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
1178 Points ∼22% -4%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
903 Points ∼17% -26%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2018
815 Points ∼15% -34%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics
Average of class Tablet (42 - 12725, n=77)
2057 Points ∼16% +129%
Average MediaTek MT8168 (898 - 901, n=3)
900 Points ∼7% 0%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
898 Points ∼7%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
427 Points ∼3% -52%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
364 Points ∼3% -59%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2018
212 Points ∼2% -76%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0
Average of class Tablet (53 - 8675, n=78)
1697 Points ∼18% +78%
Average MediaTek MT8168 (955 - 958, n=3)
956 Points ∼10% 0%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
955 Points ∼10%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
484 Points ∼5% -49%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
428 Points ∼4% -55%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2018
254 Points ∼3% -73%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
15709 Points ∼18% +4%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
15151 Points ∼18%
Average MediaTek MT8168 (14979 - 15151, n=3)
15059 Points ∼17% -1%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
14822 Points ∼17% -2%
Average of class Tablet (3675 - 51436, n=173)
14298 Points ∼17% -6%
Alldocube M8 T801
9771 Points ∼11% -36%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2018
8724 Points ∼10% -42%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score
Average of class Tablet (2109 - 221941, n=173)
24384 Points ∼4% +83%
Alldocube M8 T801
14192 Points ∼3% +6%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
13333 Points ∼2%
Average MediaTek MT8168 (13089 - 13426, n=3)
13283 Points ∼2% 0%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
7658 Points ∼1% -43%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
6897 Points ∼1% -48%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2018
5446 Points ∼1% -59%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score
Average of class Tablet (2411 - 110846, n=174)
18399 Points ∼7% +34%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
13698 Points ∼6%
Average MediaTek MT8168 (13479 - 13743, n=3)
13640 Points ∼6% 0%
Alldocube M8 T801
12895 Points ∼5% -6%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
8580 Points ∼3% -37%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
7879 Points ∼3% -42%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2018
5942 Points ∼2% -57%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
Alldocube M8 T801
39 fps ∼0% +86%
Average of class Tablet (1 - 451, n=193)
35.2 fps ∼0% +68%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
21 fps ∼0%
Average MediaTek MT8168
21 fps ∼0% 0%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
14 fps ∼0% -33%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
11 fps ∼0% -48%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2018
10 fps ∼0% -52%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16
Alldocube M8 T801
35 fps ∼1% +6%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
33 fps ∼1%
Average MediaTek MT8168
33 fps ∼1% 0%
Average of class Tablet (1.1 - 120, n=197)
23.2 fps ∼1% -30%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
21 fps ∼1% -36%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
17 fps ∼1% -48%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2018
16 fps ∼0% -52%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL
Average of class Tablet (1.6 - 220, n=127)
23.8 fps ∼4% +98%
Alldocube M8 T801
19 fps ∼3% +58%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
12 fps ∼2%
Average MediaTek MT8168
12 fps ∼2% 0%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
6.6 fps ∼1% -45%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
4.8 fps ∼1% -60%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2018
3.6 fps ∼1% -70%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
24 fps ∼7%
Average MediaTek MT8168
24 fps ∼7% 0%
Alldocube M8 T801
19 fps ∼5% -21%
Average of class Tablet (1.9 - 110, n=133)
16.8 fps ∼5% -30%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
12 fps ∼3% -50%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
9.5 fps ∼3% -60%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2018
7.3 fps ∼2% -70%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Average of class Tablet (1.7 - 173, n=79)
21.2 fps ∼0% +179%
Alldocube M8 T801
13 fps ∼0% +71%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
7.6 fps ∼0%
Average MediaTek MT8168
7.6 fps ∼0% 0%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
4.3 fps ∼0% -43%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
3.2 fps ∼0% -58%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2018
2.3 fps ∼0% -70%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
17 fps ∼0%
Average MediaTek MT8168
17 fps ∼0% 0%
Average of class Tablet (2.7 - 95, n=79)
14.3 fps ∼0% -16%
Alldocube M8 T801
12 fps ∼0% -29%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
8.5 fps ∼0% -50%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
6.9 fps ∼0% -59%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2018
5.1 fps ∼0% -70%
GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Average of class Tablet (1.7 - 49, n=29)
9.69 fps ∼6% +76%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
5.5 fps ∼4%
Average MediaTek MT8168 (5.5 - 5.5, n=2)
5.5 fps ∼4% 0%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
2.9 fps ∼2% -47%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
2 fps ∼1% -64%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Average of class Tablet (0.8 - 51.1, n=29)
9.38 fps ∼4% +421%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
1.8 fps ∼1%
Average MediaTek MT8168 (1.8 - 1.8, n=2)
1.8 fps ∼1% 0%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
0.85 fps ∼0% -53%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
0.8 fps ∼0% -56%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Average of class Tablet (2.7 - 58, n=29)
14.6 fps ∼7% +51%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
9.7 fps ∼5%
Average MediaTek MT8168 (9.7 - 9.7, n=2)
9.7 fps ∼5% 0%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
4.6 fps ∼2% -53%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
3.1 fps ∼2% -68%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Average of class Tablet (1.7 - 134, n=29)
25.1 fps ∼4% +392%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
5.1 fps ∼1%
Average MediaTek MT8168 (5.1 - 5.1, n=2)
5.1 fps ∼1% 0%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
2.3 fps ∼0% -55%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
1.7 fps ∼0% -67%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen
Average of class Tablet (1.8 - 107, n=55)
15.2 fps ∼3% +217%
Alldocube M8 T801
7.3 fps ∼2% +52%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
4.8 fps ∼1%
Average MediaTek MT8168
4.8 fps ∼1% 0%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
1.9 fps ∼0% -60%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
1.8 fps ∼0% -62%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2018
fps ∼0% -100%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen
Average of class Tablet (1.7 - 47, n=55)
9.59 fps ∼4% +4%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
9.2 fps ∼3%
Average MediaTek MT8168
9.2 fps ∼3% 0%
Alldocube M8 T801
7.3 fps ∼3% -21%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
3.8 fps ∼1% -59%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
3.6 fps ∼1% -61%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2018
fps ∼0% -100%
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet (78450 - 751846, n=14)
299758 Points ∼40% +231%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
90442 Points ∼12%
Average MediaTek MT8168 (90422 - 90442, n=2)
90432 Points ∼12% 0%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
79125 Points ∼11% -13%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
78450 Points ∼10% -13%
VRMark - Amber Room
Average of class Tablet (669 - 3130, n=5)
1455 Score ∼19% +95%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
747 Score ∼10%
Average MediaTek MT8168
747 Score ∼10% 0%
BaseMark OS II
Web
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
809 Points ∼40% +11%
Average of class Tablet (9 - 2034, n=122)
767 Points ∼38% +5%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
756 Points ∼37% +4%
Average MediaTek MT8168 (730 - 731, n=2)
731 Points ∼36% 0%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
730 Points ∼36%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2018
597 Points ∼29% -18%
Graphics
Average of class Tablet (98 - 28853, n=123)
2362 Points ∼8% +149%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
947 Points ∼3%
Average MediaTek MT8168 (946 - 947, n=2)
947 Points ∼3% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
487 Points ∼2% -49%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
472 Points ∼2% -50%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2018
333 Points ∼1% -65%
Memory
Average MediaTek MT8168 (1406 - 1416, n=2)
1411 Points ∼16% 0%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
1406 Points ∼16%
Average of class Tablet (56 - 6751, n=123)
1262 Points ∼14% -10%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
1258 Points ∼14% -11%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
1151 Points ∼13% -18%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2018
663 Points ∼7% -53%
System
Average of class Tablet (482 - 16467, n=123)
2661 Points ∼16% +48%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
1945 Points ∼12% +8%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
1802 Points ∼11%
Average MediaTek MT8168 (1788 - 1802, n=2)
1795 Points ∼11% 0%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
1539 Points ∼9% -15%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2018
1200 Points ∼7% -33%
Overall
Average of class Tablet (150 - 8450, n=122)
1392 Points ∼16% +21%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
1150 Points ∼14%
Average MediaTek MT8168 (1150 - 1150, n=2)
1150 Points ∼14% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
987 Points ∼12% -14%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
891 Points ∼11% -23%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2018
631 Points ∼7% -45%

Legende

 
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020 MediaTek MT8168, ARM Mali-G52 MP1, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Amazon Fire HD 8 2018 MediaTek MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz, ARM Mali-T720, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Lenovo Tab M8 HD Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290 Qualcomm Snapdragon 429, Qualcomm Adreno 504, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Alldocube M8 T801 MediaTek Helio X27 MT6797X, ARM Mali-T880 MP4, 32 GB eMMC Flash
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet (10.9 - 279, n=105)
58.7 Points ∼100% +145%
Alldocube M8 T801 (Chrome 72.0.3626.105)
30.352 Points ∼52% +27%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD (Chrome 79)
25.645 Points ∼44% +7%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290 (Chrome 79)
25.067 Points ∼43% +4%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020 (Silk Browser)
23.989 Points ∼41%
Average MediaTek MT8168 (23.6 - 24, n=2)
23.8 Points ∼41% -1%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2018 (Silk Browser 66.2.10.3359.126.10)
16.717 Points ∼28% -30%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Average of class Tablet (13 - 182, n=40)
72.6 Points ∼100% +142%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD (Chrome 79)
34 Points ∼47% +13%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290 (Chrome 79)
32 Points ∼44% +7%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020 (Silk Browser)
30 Points ∼41%
Average MediaTek MT8168 (30 - 30, n=2)
30 Points ∼41% 0%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2018 (Silk Browser 66.2.10.3359.126.10)
25 Points ∼34% -17%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Tablet (5.68 - 135, n=26)
51.2 runs/min ∼100% +320%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD (Chrome 79)
15.49 runs/min ∼30% +27%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290 (Chrome 79)
13.5 runs/min ∼26% +11%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020 (Silk Browser)
12.2 runs/min ∼24%
Average MediaTek MT8168
12.2 runs/min ∼24% 0%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet (1238 - 45734, n=190)
7552 Points ∼100% +84%
Alldocube M8 T801 (Chrome 72.0.3626.105)
5909 Points ∼78% +44%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD (Chrome 79)
4378 Points ∼58% +6%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290 (Chrome 79)
4297 Points ∼57% +4%
Average MediaTek MT8168 (4115 - 4222, n=2)
4169 Points ∼55% +1%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020 (Silk Browser)
4115 Points ∼54%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2018 (Silk Browser 66.2.10.3359.126.10)
2902 Points ∼38% -29%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Amazon Fire HD 8 2018 (Silk Browser 66.2.10.3359.126.10)
14320.9 ms * ∼100% -27%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020 (Silk Browser)
11253.8 ms * ∼79%
Average MediaTek MT8168 (11103 - 11254, n=2)
11178 ms * ∼78% +1%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD (Chrome 79)
10893.8 ms * ∼76% +3%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290 (Chrome 79)
10654.6 ms * ∼74% +5%
Average of class Tablet (603 - 43092, n=202)
8881 ms * ∼62% +21%
Alldocube M8 T801 (Chrome 72.0.3626.105)
7429.3 ms * ∼52% +34%

* ... kleiner is beter

Amazon Fire HD 8 2020Amazon Fire HD 8 2018Lenovo Tab M8 HDSamsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290Alldocube M8 T801Average 32 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Tablet
AndroBench 3-5
-46%
-2%
1%
-41%
-13%
-40%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
62.04 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
34.03 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-45%
64.25 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
4%
69.95 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
13%
52.2 (3.4 - 87.1, n=167)
-16%
49.7 (14 - 73.8, n=70)
-20%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
84.13 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
51.36 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-39%
83.83 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
0%
87.13 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
4%
71.1 (8.2 - 96.5, n=167)
-15%
67.7 (17.6 - 87.7, n=70)
-20%
Random Write 4KB
15.72
12.25
-22%
15.84
1%
16.89
7%
10.01
-36%
19.2 (0.75 - 89.5, n=210)
22%
10.6 (0.13 - 262, n=222)
-33%
Random Read 4KB
67.61
26.98
-60%
77.44
15%
57.77
-15%
19.5
-71%
41.1 (3.59 - 117, n=210)
-39%
25 (1.04 - 230, n=222)
-63%
Sequential Write 256KB
103.95
41.89
-60%
79.55
-23%
108.54
4%
103.02
-1%
96.7 (14.8 - 189, n=210)
-7%
53.7 (2.04 - 732, n=222)
-48%
Sequential Read 256KB
315.01
158.46
-50%
297.09
-6%
291.87
-7%
142.8
-55%
239 (25.8 - 452, n=210)
-24%
143 (6.75 - 1789, n=222)
-55%
PUBG Compare
010203040Tooltip
; PUBG Mobile: Ø19 (10-22)
; Arena of Valor: Ø30.2 (27-31)
; Asphalt 8: Airborne: Ø26.7 (19-29)
Max. Belasting
 28.4 °C27.7 °C30.4 °C 
 29.5 °C27.9 °C30 °C 
 28.4 °C27.8 °C28.5 °C 
Maximum: 30.4 °C
Gemiddelde: 28.7 °C
29.2 °C28.8 °C26.8 °C
30.5 °C27 °C27.2 °C
27 °C27.5 °C27.3 °C
Maximum: 30.5 °C
Gemiddelde: 27.9 °C
Stroomadapter (max.)  28.8 °C | Kamertemperatuur 20.8 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 28.7 °C / 84 F, compared to the average of 30.6 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 30.4 °C / 87 F, compared to the average of 34.6 °C / 94 F, ranging from 22.2 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 30.5 °C / 87 F, compared to the average of 34.1 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.3 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 30.6 °C / 87 F.
Thermisch beeld - bovenzijde
Thermisch beeld - bovenzijde
Thermisch beeld - onderzijde
Thermisch beeld - onderzijde
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2034.832.92519.624.83123.9264024.326.15030.530.76318.725.58020.421.610018.629.212517.537.916019.548.320019.248.625016.454.531515.25640014.25850014.761.563013.863.280014.664.9100014.166.9125013.569.1160014.468.3200013.968.2250013.868.4315013.866.6400014.767.2500014.270.4630014.471800014.972.21000015721250015.168.61600015.359.8SPL26.580.6N0.849.1median 14.7median 66.6Delta0.87.329.83325.226.621.626.924.717.929.625.522.523.925.126.320.125.819.926.920.836.917.641.117.647.417.450.316.153.613.95514.559.216.161.314.56714.471.513.672.113.973.514.576.114.477.814.877.614.776.814.873.614.971.915.170.91562.615.147.426.9860.959.1median 14.9median 62.61.512.6hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseAmazon Fire HD 8 2020Lenovo Tab M8 HD
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 18% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 15% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 81% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Lenovo Tab M8 HD audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.9% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 12.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (27.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 78% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 15% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 83% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 12% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Stroomgebruik
Uit / Standbydarklight 0.01 / 0.18 Watt
Inactiefdarkmidlight 0.72 / 2.97 / 2.99 Watt
Belasting midlight 4.02 / 5.1 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
4850 mAh
Amazon Fire HD 8 2018
4750 mAh
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
5100 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
5100 mAh
Alldocube M8 T801
5500 mAh
Power Consumption
-24%
27%
13%
-139%
Idle Minimum *
0.72
0.97
-35%
0.66
8%
0.62
14%
3.4
-372%
Idle Average *
2.97
3.26
-10%
2.15
28%
2.68
10%
5.1
-72%
Idle Maximum *
2.99
3.37
-13%
2.18
27%
2.7
10%
5.3
-77%
Load Average *
4.02
5.68
-41%
2.48
38%
3.61
10%
6
-49%
Load Maximum *
5.1
6.21
-22%
3.49
32%
4
22%
11.5
-125%

* ... kleiner is beter

Batterijduur
Inactief (zonder WLAN, minimale helderheid)
44h 21min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
15h 02min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
15h 49min
Belast (maximale helderheid)
4h 46min
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
4850 mAh
Amazon Fire HD 8 2018
4750 mAh
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
5100 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
5100 mAh
Alldocube M8 T801
5500 mAh
Batterijduur
-35%
43%
7%
-53%
Reader / Idle
2661
1168
-56%
3581
35%
3132
18%
H.264
949
498
-48%
1696
79%
934
-2%
WiFi v1.3
902
490
-46%
1124
25%
831
-8%
420
-53%
Load
286
316
10%
374
31%
342
20%

Pro

+ aantrekkelijk geprijsd
+ lange batterijduur
+ goede WiFi-prestaties
+ helder scherm

Contra

- besturingssysteem is sterk gebouwd rond Amazon
- Amazon App Store bevat niet alle apps
- er is een toeslag nodig om van advertenties af te komen

Conclusie - Verbeteringen over de hele lijn

Getest: Amazon Fire HD 8 (2020). Testtoestel voorzien door: Amazon Germany
Getest: Amazon Fire HD 8 (2020). Testtoestel voorzien door: Amazon Germany

Dit is de verkorte versie van het originele artikel. Het volledige, Engelse testrapport vind je hier.

De 2020-versie van de Fire HD 8 biedt aanzienlijke prestatieverbeteringen en een iets moderner ontwerp dan zijn voorganger, de Fire HD 8 (2018). Voor de vermelde prijs is het toestel niet alleen vergelijkbaar met de concurrentie, maar kan het deze ook overtreffen op sommige gebieden, zoals WLAN-snelheid. Bovendien heeft het nieuwe model een aanzienlijk betere batterijduur die meer dan 15 uur runtime mogelijk maakt, wat het vorige model totaal overtreft.

Amazon verbetert de Fire HD8 in alle opzichten, maar behoudt nog steeds zijn lage prijs.

Of de gebruiker er nu voor kiest om de "speciale aanbiedingen" te behouden of te schrappen, dankzij het sterk aangepaste FireOS is de Fire HD 8 (2020) vooral de moeite waard voor Amazon-klanten die ook veel gebruik maken van de diensten van het bedrijf. Omdat er in deze prijsklasse inmiddels prima alternatieven gestaan zoals de Lenovo Tab M8 HD, hoeven gebruikers die een goedkope en krachtige tablet willen niet per se een Fire-toestel aan te schaffen. Maar als u een Fire HD 8 (2018) bezit en deze graag gebruikt, is het de moeite waard om over te schakelen naar het 2020-model, aangezien de prestaties over de gehele lijn zijn verbeterd.

Amazon Fire HD 8 2020 - 04-08-2020 v7
Mike Wobker

Behuizing
75 / 98 → 77%
Toetsenbord
69 / 80 → 86%
Aanwijsapparaat
87%
Aansluitmogelijkheden
37 / 70 → 53%
Gewicht
86 / 40-88 → 95%
Batterij
90%
Beeldscherm
85%
Gaming-performance
8 / 78 → 10%
Applicatie-performance
41 / 92 → 44%
Temperatuur
95%
Luidheid
100%
Audio
81 / 91 → 89%
Camera
34 / 85 → 40%
Gemiddelde
68%
81%
Tablet - Gewogen Gemiddelde

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Overzichten en testrapporten over laptops en mobieltjes > Testrapporten > Kort testrapport Amazon Fire HD 8 (2020): Geüpdatete Fire Tablet biedt aanzienlijk hogere prestaties
Mike Wobker, 2020-08-22 (Update: 2020-08-22)