Notebookcheck

Kort testrapport Gigaset GS270 Smartphone

Mike Wobker (vertaald door Siemon Boes), 04-06-2018

Betaalbare langeafstandsloper. Voor een prijs van 200 euro ($234) biedt Gigaset een instapsmartphone die uitgerust is met een batterij van 5000 mAh. Het zal geen verrassing zijn dat de GS270 hiermee een lange batterijduur haalt. We evalueren in onze test wat de koper daarnaast nog kan verwachten.

goed (79%) Gigaset GS270 Mediatek MT6750ARM Mali-T860 MP2 Smartphone - 27-05-2018 - v6
Testtoestel voorzien door Gigaset Deutschland
Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG
Gigaset GS270 (GS Serie)
Processor
Mediatek MT6750
Grafische kaart
ARM Mali-T860 MP2
Geheugen
2048 MB 
Beeldscherm
5.2 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 424 PPI, Capacitief, IPS, Krasbestendig en stofafwerend, glimmend: ja
Opslag
16 GB eMMC Flash, 16 GB 
, 12 GB beschikbaar
Verbindingen
1 USB 2.0, Audio Verbindingen: 3.5mm, Card Reader: microSD-sleuf (gedeeld, max. 128GB), 1 Vingerafdruklezer, Sensoren: Positiesensor, afstandssensor, helderheidssensor, microUSB
Netwerkmogelijkheden
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n), Bluetooth 4.0, GSM (850/​900/​1800/​1900), UMTS (900/​2100), LTE (B1/​B3/​B7/​B20), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Afmetingen
hoogte x breedte x diepte (in mm): 8.95 x 149.5 x 74
Batterij
5000 mAh Lithium-Polymer, Gesprekstijd 2G (volgens fabrikant): 47 h, Gesprekstijd 3G (volgens fabrikant): 26 h, Standby 2G (volgens fabrikant): 850 h, Standby 3G (volgens fabrikant): 700 h
Besturingssysteem
Android 7.0 Nougat
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix f/​2.2, contrast-AF, LED-flash, video's @1080p/​30fps
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix
Bijkomende functionaliteiten
Luidsprekers: 1, Toetsenbord: Virtueel, Toetsenbordverlichting: ja, Koptelefoon, USB-lader, USB Type-A-naar-MicroUSB-kabel, 24 Maanden Garantie, SAR-body: 1.356 W/kg, SAR-head: 0.562, fanless
Gewicht
160 g, Voeding: 65 g
Prijs
200 Euro

 

Formaat Vergelijking

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 939, n=259)
186 MBit/s ∼100% +69%
Oukitel U18
Mali-T860 MP2, MT6750, 64 GB eMMC Flash
111 MBit/s ∼60% +1%
Gigaset GS270
Mali-T860 MP2, MT6750, 16 GB eMMC Flash
110 MBit/s ∼59%
HTC Desire 12
PowerVR GE8100, MT6739, 32 GB eMMC Flash
61.06 MBit/s ∼33% -44%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
Adreno 506, 625, 64 GB eMMC Flash
53.9 MBit/s ∼29% -51%
Huawei Y6 2018
Adreno 308, 425, 16 GB eMMC Flash
50.5 MBit/s ∼27% -54%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 703, n=259)
182 MBit/s ∼100% +64%
Gigaset GS270
Mali-T860 MP2, MT6750, 16 GB eMMC Flash
111 MBit/s ∼61%
Oukitel U18
Mali-T860 MP2, MT6750, 64 GB eMMC Flash
102 MBit/s ∼56% -8%
HTC Desire 12
PowerVR GE8100, MT6739, 32 GB eMMC Flash
81.83 MBit/s ∼45% -26%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
Adreno 506, 625, 64 GB eMMC Flash
55.7 MBit/s ∼31% -50%
Huawei Y6 2018
Adreno 308, 425, 16 GB eMMC Flash
52.2 MBit/s ∼29% -53%
GPS Garmin Egde 520
GPS Garmin Egde 520
GPS Garmin Egde 520
GPS Garmin Egde 520
GPS Garmin Egde 520
GPS Garmin Egde 520
GPS Gigaset GS270
GPS Gigaset GS270
GPS Gigaset GS270
GPS Gigaset GS270
GPS Gigaset GS270
GPS Gigaset GS270

Beeldvergelijking

Bekijk een scène en navigeer binnen het eerste beeld. Eén klik wijzigt het zoomniveau. Eén klik op het ingezoomde beeld opent het origineel in een nieuw venster. Het eerste beeld toont de verschaalde foto van het testtoestel.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
klik om beelden te laden
410
cd/m²
412
cd/m²
405
cd/m²
412
cd/m²
427
cd/m²
431
cd/m²
413
cd/m²
418
cd/m²
435
cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 435 cd/m² Gemiddelde: 418.1 cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling: 93 %
Helderheid in Batterij-modus: 421 cd/m²
Contrast: 1581:1 (Zwart: 0.27 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.4 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.3
ΔE Greyscale 8.6 | 0.64-98 Ø6.5
89.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 1.9
Gigaset GS270
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2
Oukitel U18
LCD IPS, 1512x720, 5.85
Huawei Y6 2018
IPS, 1440x720, 5.7
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
IPS, 2160x1080, 5.99
HTC Desire 12
IPS, 1440x720, 5.5
Screen
-9%
1%
12%
23%
Brightness middle
427
565
32%
483
13%
620
45%
502
18%
Brightness
418
535
28%
460
10%
612
46%
499
19%
Brightness Distribution
93
83
-11%
88
-5%
96
3%
84
-10%
Black Level *
0.27
0.55
-104%
0.4
-48%
0.57
-111%
0.2
26%
Contrast
1581
1027
-35%
1208
-24%
1088
-31%
2510
59%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
6.4
7.1
-11%
5.8
9%
3.46
46%
5.4
16%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
14.24
13.7
4%
12.6
12%
7.88
45%
10.8
24%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
8.6
6.2
28%
5
42%
3.9
55%
6.2
28%
Gamma
1.9 126%
2.85 84%
2.6 92%
2.073 116%
2.07 116%
CCT
7366 88%
7153 91%
7709 84%
7230 90%
7660 85%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
4.42

* ... kleiner is beter

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Om de schermhelderheid te verlagen schakelen sommige laptops het backlight erg snel aan en uit. Dit gebeurt aan een dergelijk hoge frequentie dat het niet zichtbaar is voor het menselijk oog. Als de frequentie te laag is kunnen personen met gevoelige ogen geïrriteerd geraken, hoofdpijn krijgen en zelfs flickering waarnemen.
Screen flickering / PWM niet waargenomen

Ter vergelijking: 53 % van alle geteste toestellen maakten geen gebruik van PWM om de schermhelderheid te verlagen. Als het wel werd gebruikt, werd een gemiddelde van 8813 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz waargenomen.

Responstijd Scherm

De responstijden van het scherm tonen hoe snel het scherm in staat is om van één kleur naar de andere te veranderen. Trage responstijden kunnen aanleiding geven tot 'nabeelden' rond bewegende objecten of het scherm wazig maken (blur). Vooral spelers van snelle 3D-games hebben baat bij een scherm met snelle responstijden.
       Responstijd Zwart naar Wit
30 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd↗ ms stijging
↘ ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde trage responstijden in onze tests en is misschien te traag voor games.
Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.8 (minimum) tot 240 (maximum) ms. » 73 % van alle toestellen zijn beter.
Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd slechter is dan het gemiddelde (25.8 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.
       Responstijd 50% Grijs naar 80% Grijs
56 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd↗ ms stijging
↘ ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde trage responstijden in onze tests en is misschien te traag voor games.
Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.9 (minimum) tot 636 (maximum) ms. » 91 % van alle toestellen zijn beter.
Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd slechter is dan het gemiddelde (41.3 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sorteer op waarde)
Gigaset GS270
42649 Points ∼60%
Huawei Y6 2018
39089 Points ∼55% -8%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
60490 Points ∼85% +42%
HTC Desire 12
36253 Points ∼51% -15%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (38547 - 44842, n=15)
41877 Points ∼59% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (23275 - 230642, n=350)
70775 Points ∼100% +66%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sorteer op waarde)
Gigaset GS270
Points ∼0%
Oukitel U18
54989 Points ∼55%
Huawei Y6 2018
46710 Points ∼46%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
76178 Points ∼76%
HTC Desire 12
46366 Points ∼46%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (52278 - 56639, n=10)
43747 Points ∼43%
Average of class Smartphone (17073 - 290397, n=127)
100740 Points ∼100%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sorteer op waarde)
Gigaset GS270
3230 Points ∼66%
Oukitel U18
3358 Points ∼68% +4%
Huawei Y6 2018
3629 Points ∼74% +12%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
4905 Points ∼100% +52%
HTC Desire 12
3320 Points ∼68% +3%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (3257 - 3394, n=17)
2829 Points ∼58% -12%
Average of class Smartphone (2814 - 8601, n=214)
4398 Points ∼90% +36%
Work performance score (sorteer op waarde)
Gigaset GS270
4287 Points ∼74%
Oukitel U18
4532 Points ∼78% +6%
Huawei Y6 2018
4756 Points ∼82% +11%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
5801 Points ∼100% +35%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (4190 - 4532, n=13)
3614 Points ∼62% -16%
Average of class Smartphone (5960 - 10264, n=378)
4665 Points ∼80% +9%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sorteer op waarde)
Gigaset GS270
10 Points ∼1%
Oukitel U18
698 Points ∼97% +6880%
Huawei Y6 2018
616 Points ∼85% +6060%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
722 Points ∼100% +7120%
HTC Desire 12
591 Points ∼82% +5810%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (9 - 1137, n=17)
457 Points ∼63% +4470%
Average of class Smartphone (7 - 1682, n=453)
666 Points ∼92% +6560%
Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Gigaset GS270
639 Points ∼42%
Oukitel U18
640 Points ∼42% 0%
Huawei Y6 2018
443 Points ∼29% -31%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
1017 Points ∼67% +59%
HTC Desire 12
18 Points ∼1% -97%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (471 - 649, n=17)
587 Points ∼39% -8%
Average of class Smartphone (18 - 9248, n=453)
1510 Points ∼100% +136%
Memory (sorteer op waarde)
Gigaset GS270
834 Points ∼74%
Oukitel U18
798 Points ∼71% -4%
Huawei Y6 2018
1069 Points ∼95% +28%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
961 Points ∼85% +15%
HTC Desire 12
984 Points ∼88% +18%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (623 - 1288, n=17)
849 Points ∼76% +2%
Average of class Smartphone (21 - 4798, n=453)
1124 Points ∼100% +35%
System (sorteer op waarde)
Gigaset GS270
1837 Points ∼57%
Oukitel U18
1838 Points ∼57% 0%
Huawei Y6 2018
1043 Points ∼32% -43%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
3236 Points ∼100% +76%
HTC Desire 12
1526 Points ∼47% -17%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (1259 - 2003, n=17)
1811 Points ∼56% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (369 - 10281, n=453)
2257 Points ∼70% +23%
Overall (sorteer op waarde)
Gigaset GS270
312 Points ∼25%
Oukitel U18
899 Points ∼73% +188%
Huawei Y6 2018
743 Points ∼60% +138%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
1229 Points ∼100% +294%
HTC Desire 12
637 Points ∼52% +104%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (298 - 965, n=17)
676 Points ∼55% +117%
Average of class Smartphone (150 - 4308, n=457)
1131 Points ∼92% +263%
Geekbench 4.1/4.2
Compute RenderScript Score (sorteer op waarde)
Gigaset GS270
1718 Points ∼45%
Huawei Y6 2018
1419 Points ∼37% -17%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
3316 Points ∼86% +93%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (1393 - 1935, n=14)
1702 Points ∼44% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (836 - 14417, n=153)
3853 Points ∼100% +124%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sorteer op waarde)
Gigaset GS270
2623 Points ∼61%
Oukitel U18
2617 Points ∼61% 0%
Huawei Y6 2018
1939 Points ∼45% -26%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
4292 Points ∼100% +64%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (1790 - 2765, n=16)
2504 Points ∼58% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (1099 - 10558, n=200)
3952 Points ∼92% +51%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sorteer op waarde)
Gigaset GS270
615 Points ∼53%
Oukitel U18
608 Points ∼52% -1%
Huawei Y6 2018
692 Points ∼60% +13%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
870 Points ∼75% +41%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (590 - 682, n=16)
616 Points ∼53% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (394 - 4265, n=201)
1159 Points ∼100% +88%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Gigaset GS270
1111 Points ∼55%
Oukitel U18
1195 Points ∼59% +8%
Huawei Y6 2018
Points ∼0% -100%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
2038 Points ∼100% +83%
HTC Desire 12
589 Points ∼29% -47%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (710 - 1233, n=17)
1104 Points ∼54% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (500 - 3669, n=303)
1544 Points ∼76% +39%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Gigaset GS270
324 Points ∼31%
Oukitel U18
329 Points ∼31% +2%
Huawei Y6 2018
Points ∼0% -100%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
379 Points ∼36% +17%
HTC Desire 12
92 Points ∼9% -72%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (90 - 329, n=17)
280 Points ∼27% -14%
Average of class Smartphone (70 - 5220, n=303)
1049 Points ∼100% +224%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sorteer op waarde)
Gigaset GS270
385 Points ∼38%
Oukitel U18
393 Points ∼39% +2%
Huawei Y6 2018
Points ∼0% -100%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
463 Points ∼46% +20%
HTC Desire 12
113 Points ∼11% -71%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (113 - 393, n=17)
334 Points ∼33% -13%
Average of class Smartphone (87 - 4734, n=311)
1006 Points ∼100% +161%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Gigaset GS270
1122 Points ∼55%
Oukitel U18
1219 Points ∼59% +9%
Huawei Y6 2018
907 Points ∼44% -19%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
2058 Points ∼100% +83%
HTC Desire 12
593 Points ∼29% -47%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (718 - 1219, n=17)
1080 Points ∼52% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (474 - 3642, n=334)
1449 Points ∼70% +29%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Gigaset GS270
478 Points ∼34%
Oukitel U18
484 Points ∼34% +1%
Huawei Y6 2018
55 Points ∼4% -88%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
732 Points ∼51% +53%
HTC Desire 12
148 Points ∼10% -69%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (109 - 484, n=17)
407 Points ∼29% -15%
Average of class Smartphone (107 - 8312, n=334)
1423 Points ∼100% +198%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sorteer op waarde)
Gigaset GS270
548 Points ∼45%
Oukitel U18
559 Points ∼46% +2%
Huawei Y6 2018
70 Points ∼6% -87%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
854 Points ∼70% +56%
HTC Desire 12
178 Points ∼15% -68%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (136 - 559, n=17)
468 Points ∼38% -15%
Average of class Smartphone (120 - 6378, n=342)
1223 Points ∼100% +123%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Gigaset GS270
8329 Points ∼53%
Oukitel U18
10143 Points ∼65% +22%
Huawei Y6 2018
10344 Points ∼66% +24%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
15593 Points ∼100% +87%
HTC Desire 12
9856 Points ∼63% +18%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (9934 - 10553, n=17)
8835 Points ∼57% +6%
Average of class Smartphone (8065 - 36762, n=489)
12157 Points ∼78% +46%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sorteer op waarde)
Gigaset GS270
10010 Points ∼64%
Oukitel U18
10100 Points ∼65% +1%
Huawei Y6 2018
5426 Points ∼35% -46%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
13219 Points ∼85% +32%
HTC Desire 12
3597 Points ∼23% -64%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (9476 - 10361, n=17)
8617 Points ∼55% -14%
Average of class Smartphone (2465 - 113380, n=489)
15596 Points ∼100% +56%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sorteer op waarde)
Gigaset GS270
9580 Points ∼70%
Oukitel U18
10117 Points ∼74% +6%
Huawei Y6 2018
6067 Points ∼44% -37%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
13682 Points ∼100% +43%
HTC Desire 12
4188 Points ∼31% -56%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (9574 - 10269, n=17)
8677 Points ∼63% -9%
Average of class Smartphone (2915 - 64405, n=490)
13491 Points ∼99% +41%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sorteer op waarde)
Oukitel U18
17 fps ∼62%
Huawei Y6 2018
7.7 fps ∼28%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
23 fps ∼84%
HTC Desire 12
5.9 fps ∼22%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (12 - 17, n=14)
15.1 fps ∼55%
Average of class Smartphone (4.1 - 177, n=517)
27.4 fps ∼100%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sorteer op waarde)
Oukitel U18
25 fps ∼100%
Huawei Y6 2018
14 fps ∼56%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
17 fps ∼68%
HTC Desire 12
9.7 fps ∼39%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (12 - 25, n=14)
20.2 fps ∼81%
Average of class Smartphone (6.9 - 120, n=520)
23.6 fps ∼94%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sorteer op waarde)
Gigaset GS270
6.8 fps ∼47%
Oukitel U18
6.8 fps ∼47% 0%
Huawei Y6 2018
2.8 fps ∼19% -59%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
9.9 fps ∼68% +46%
HTC Desire 12
2.7 fps ∼19% -60%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (5.3 - 7.1, n=15)
6.28 fps ∼43% -8%
Average of class Smartphone (2.2 - 88.2, n=440)
14.5 fps ∼100% +113%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sorteer op waarde)
Gigaset GS270
6.8 fps ∼47%
Oukitel U18
13 fps ∼89% +91%
Huawei Y6 2018
5.9 fps ∼40% -13%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
9.4 fps ∼64% +38%
HTC Desire 12
5.4 fps ∼37% -21%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (5.6 - 13, n=15)
9.73 fps ∼67% +43%
Average of class Smartphone (4.4 - 115, n=442)
14.6 fps ∼100% +115%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Gigaset GS270
4.6 fps ∼37%
Oukitel U18
4.6 fps ∼37% 0%
Huawei Y6 2018
fps ∼0% -100%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
6.5 fps ∼52% +41%
HTC Desire 12
1.6 fps ∼13% -65%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (3.5 - 4.7, n=15)
4.19 fps ∼34% -9%
Average of class Smartphone (1.3 - 60, n=304)
12.5 fps ∼100% +172%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Gigaset GS270
4.5 fps ∼36%
Oukitel U18
10 fps ∼79% +122%
Huawei Y6 2018
fps ∼0% -100%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
6.2 fps ∼49% +38%
HTC Desire 12
3.5 fps ∼28% -22%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (3.8 - 10, n=15)
7.23 fps ∼57% +61%
Average of class Smartphone (2.6 - 110, n=306)
12.6 fps ∼100% +180%
GFXBench
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Gigaset GS270
2.4 fps ∼28%
Oukitel U18
2.4 fps ∼28% 0%
Huawei Y6 2018
fps ∼0% -100%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
3.5 fps ∼41% +46%
HTC Desire 12
0.91 fps ∼11% -62%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (1.9 - 2.5, n=16)
2.25 fps ∼26% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (0.72 - 35, n=236)
8.57 fps ∼100% +257%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Gigaset GS270
2.4 fps ∼31%
Oukitel U18
2.4 fps ∼31% 0%
Huawei Y6 2018
fps ∼0% -100%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
3.4 fps ∼43% +42%
HTC Desire 12
1.5 fps ∼19% -37%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (2.3 - 4.9, n=16)
3.44 fps ∼44% +43%
Average of class Smartphone (1.1 - 50, n=239)
7.84 fps ∼100% +227%

Legende

 
Gigaset GS270 Mediatek MT6750, ARM Mali-T860 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Oukitel U18 Mediatek MT6750, ARM Mali-T860 MP2, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei Y6 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Qualcomm Adreno 308, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 625, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
HTC Desire 12 Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 32 GB eMMC Flash
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (10.8 - 224, n=372)
33.4 Points ∼100% +81%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus (Chrome 66)
23.097 Points ∼69% +25%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (16.6 - 20.8, n=17)
18.8 Points ∼56% +2%
Huawei Y6 2018 (Chrome 66)
18.55 Points ∼56% 0%
Gigaset GS270
18.475 Points ∼55%
Oukitel U18 (Chrome 65)
18.33 Points ∼55% -1%
HTC Desire 12 (Chrome 66.0.3359.158)
15.791 Points ∼47% -15%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (1506 - 35255, n=508)
4996 Points ∼100% +57%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus (Chrome 66)
4424 Points ∼89% +39%
Oukitel U18 (Chrome 65)
3377 Points ∼68% +6%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (2712 - 3506, n=17)
3197 Points ∼64% +1%
Gigaset GS270
3175 Points ∼64%
HTC Desire 12 (Chrome 66.0.3359.158)
2930 Points ∼59% -8%
Huawei Y6 2018 (Chrome 66)
2582 Points ∼52% -19%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
HTC Desire 12 (Chrome 66.0.3359.158)
17134 ms * ∼100% -21%
Huawei Y6 2018 (Chrome 66)
16192.4 ms * ∼95% -15%
Oukitel U18 (Chrome 65)
14565.8 ms * ∼85% -3%
Gigaset GS270
14103.2 ms * ∼82%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (11708 - 22627, n=17)
13987 ms * ∼82% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (718 - 59466, n=527)
11914 ms * ∼70% +16%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus (Chrome 66)
10895 ms * ∼64% +23%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus (Chrome 66)
112 Points ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone (27 - 362, n=249)
99.9 Points ∼89%
Huawei Y6 2018 (Chrome 66)
71 Points ∼63%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (34 - 78, n=5)
61 Points ∼54%

* ... kleiner is beter

Gigaset GS270Oukitel U18Huawei Y6 2018Xiaomi Redmi 5 PlusHTC Desire 12Average 16 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
20%
9%
74%
7%
-32%
4%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
58.9
47.02 (Tosh-iba Exceria Pro M401)
-20%
64 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
9%
59.46
1%
61.06 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
4%
37.1 (6.38 - 65.4, n=106)
-37%
43.9 (3.4 - 87.1, n=284)
-25%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
75.8
71.52 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-6%
84.9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
12%
84.38
11%
81.83 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
8%
55.4 (10.8 - 87.7, n=106)
-27%
62.3 (8.2 - 96.5, n=284)
-18%
Random Write 4KB
10.95
12.96
18%
9
-18%
7.1
-35%
7.54
-31%
7.3 (0.49 - 37.9, n=221)
-33%
13.6 (0.14 - 164, n=566)
24%
Random Read 4KB
34.64
28.7
-17%
38.8
12%
79.5
130%
16.69
-52%
19.8 (2.49 - 61.7, n=221)
-43%
34.9 (1.59 - 173, n=566)
1%
Sequential Write 256KB
44.86
109.2
143%
65.6
46%
194.5
334%
103.77
131%
41.1 (8.74 - 97.6, n=221)
-8%
73.2 (2.99 - 228, n=566)
63%
Sequential Read 256KB
269.01
273.1
2%
254.3
-5%
270
0%
211.38
-21%
157 (9.66 - 294, n=221)
-42%
214 (12.1 - 832, n=566)
-20%
Max. Belasting
 38.3 °C24.5 °C38.3 °C 
 38.4 °C34.9 °C40.1 °C 
 38.1 °C34.8 °C38.1 °C 
Maximum: 40.1 °C
Gemiddelde: 36.2 °C
33.2 °C35.5 °C38.4 °C
33.1 °C35.5 °C38.5 °C
34 °C35.1 °C37.1 °C
Maximum: 38.5 °C
Gemiddelde: 35.6 °C
Stroomadapter (max.)  42.1 °C | Kamertemperatuur 21.8 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.736.52533.939.43138.8374044.740.55048.137.26327.134.88025.531.410024.128.812520.828.116020.130.320020.633.825018.936.631518.240.940017.647.150016.749.86301655.980015.560.9100015.165125015.263.8160014.962.3200014.762250014.862315014.762.4400014.761.3500014.861.2630014.961.9800014.865.81000014.966.21250014.860.31600014.854SPL58.527.974.4N12132.8median 15.1Gigaset GS270median 60.9Delta2.29.335.243.332.945.137.234.331.74039.640.328.331.827.333.826.929.226.731.92427.920.928.220.939.819.534.418.54817.56117.563.815.769.415.87316.672.515.871.615.47115.567.21668.615.874.41680.316.38216.376.116.269.716.464.416.451.328.6871.163.6median 16.4HTC Desire 12median 67.22.113.5hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Gigaset GS270 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (74.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.8% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 20% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 69% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 52% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 40% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

HTC Desire 12 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 35.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (28.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 68% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 22% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 82% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 13% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Stroomgebruik
Uit / Standbydarklight 0.3 / 0.5 Watt
Inactiefdarkmidlight 0.8 / 1.6 / 2 Watt
Belasting midlight 3.7 / 5.7 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Gigaset GS270
5000 mAh
Oukitel U18
4000 mAh
Huawei Y6 2018
3000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
4000 mAh
HTC Desire 12
2730 mAh
Average Mediatek MT6750
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-83%
-58%
-35%
-10%
-30%
-4%
Idle Minimum *
0.8
1.12
-40%
1.7
-113%
0.7
12%
1.13
-41%
1.163 (0.57 - 2.3, n=17)
-45%
0.872 (0.2 - 3.4, n=587)
-9%
Idle Average *
1.6
2.27
-42%
2.5
-56%
2.8
-75%
2.03
-27%
2.05 (1.42 - 3.5, n=17)
-28%
1.703 (0.6 - 6.2, n=586)
-6%
Idle Maximum *
2
2.49
-25%
3.2
-60%
3.4
-70%
2.05
-3%
2.46 (1.47 - 5.9, n=17)
-23%
1.968 (0.74 - 6.6, n=587)
2%
Load Average *
3.7
10.75
-191%
5.2
-41%
4.2
-14%
3.68
1%
5.18 (3.24 - 10.8, n=17)
-40%
3.99 (0.8 - 10.8, n=581)
-8%
Load Maximum *
5.7
12.39
-117%
6.8
-19%
7.2
-26%
4.52
21%
6.45 (3.3 - 12.4, n=17)
-13%
5.63 (1.2 - 14.2, n=581)
1%

* ... kleiner is beter

Batterijduur
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
12h 15min
Gigaset GS270
5000 mAh
Oukitel U18
4000 mAh
Huawei Y6 2018
3000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
4000 mAh
HTC Desire 12
2730 mAh
Batterijduur
WiFi v1.3
735
639
-13%
643
-13%
497
-32%
440
-40%

Pro

+ lange batterijduur
+ goed contrast
+ degelijke bouwkwaliteit

Contra

- matige camera
- lage schermhelderheid
- slechte luidspreker
Gigaset GS270 onder de loep. Testtoestel voorzien door Gigaset Germany.
Gigaset GS270 onder de loep. Testtoestel voorzien door Gigaset Germany.

Dit is de verkorte versie van het originele artikel. Het volledige, Engelse testrapport vind je hier.

In onze test toont de Gigaset GS270 zich als een mid-range smartphone die weinig ernstige zwaktes vertoont. De prestaties voldoen aan de verwachtingen gezien de ingebouwde hardware en afgezien van de ietwat verouderde versie van Android hebben we nauwelijks een reden tot klagen. Hoewel veel concurrerende toestellen op sommige vlakken beter scoren, hebben zij dan weer andere problemen.

Kopers van de GS270 krijgen precies wat Gigaset belooft: een Android-smartphone voor 200 euro (~$234) met een lange batterijduur en een vlotte werking voor alledaags gebruik.

Voor een prijs van ongeveer 200 euro (~$234) doen geïnteresseerde kopers er goed aan om echt na te denken over de features die ze belangrijk vinden in een smartphone. Al wie slechts af en toe een foto maakt en weinig veeleisende applicaties gebruik, zal in de Gigaset GS270 een degelijk toestel vinden dat geschikt is voor telefoongesprekken en alle gebruikelijke applicaties aankan. Daarnaast overtreft de smartphone de meeste van zijn concurrenten met zijn lange batterijduur.

Gigaset GS270 - 27-05-2018 v6
Mike Wobker

Behuizing
80%
Toetsenbord
65 / 75 → 87%
Aanwijsapparaat
83%
Aansluitmogelijkheden
37 / 60 → 62%
Gewicht
91%
Batterij
95%
Beeldscherm
83%
Gaming-performance
20 / 63 → 32%
Applicatie-performance
36 / 70 → 51%
Temperatuur
89%
Luidheid
100%
Audio
51 / 91 → 56%
Camera
65%
Gemiddelde
66%
79%
Smartphone - Gewogen Gemiddelde

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Overzichten en testrapporten over laptops en mobieltjes > Testrapporten > Kort testrapport Gigaset GS270 Smartphone
Mike Wobker, 2018-06- 4 (Update: 2018-06- 4)