Notebookcheck

Kort testrapport Asus ZenBook 15 (i7-8565U, GTX1050 Max-Q) Laptop

Mike Wobker, 👁 Sebastian Jentsch, T. Hinum, 14-02-2019

Compact en krachtig. Dankzij Intel's Core i7-8565U en Nvidia's GTX 1050 Max-Q biedt de Asus ZenBook 15 veel prestaties in een zeer slanke behuizing. Met een snelle SSD en 16 GB RAM laat de Asus-notebook weinig te wensen over. Lees onze testrapport om erachter te komen of dit echt zo is.

Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD
Processor
Intel Core i7-8565U
Grafische kaart
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q - 2048 MB, Core: 1000 MHz, Geheugen: 1752 MHz, Boost: 1139 MHz, 398.75, Intel UHD Graphics 620
Geheugen
16384 MB 
, Dual-Channel
Beeldscherm
15.6 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, BOE07D8, IPS, glimmend: ja
Moederbord
Intel Cannon Lake-U PCH-LP Premium
Opslag
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G, 512 GB 
, 430 GB beschikbaar
Geluidskaart
Intel Cannon Lake-LP - cAVS
Verbindingen
1 USB 3.0, 2 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 HDMI, Audio Verbindingen: 3.5-mm gecombineerde audiopoort, Card Reader: SD
Netwerkmogelijkheden
Intel Wireless-AC 9560 (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 5.0
Afmetingen
hoogte x breedte x diepte (in mm): 18 x 354 x 220
Batterij
73 Wh, 4800 mAh Lithium-Polymer, Batterijduur: 16 h
Besturingssysteem
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: 0.9 MP, 16:9, 1.280 x 720
Bijkomende functionaliteiten
Luidsprekers: Stereo, Harman Kardon, Toetsenbord: Chiclet-style, Toetsenbordverlichting: ja, stroomadapter, cleaning cloth, 24 Maanden Garantie
Gewicht
1.6 kg, Voeding: 383 g
Prijs
1600 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD

Size Comparison

365.8 mm 252.8 mm 20.2 mm 2 kg365 mm 251 mm 18.9 mm 1.9 kg360 mm 254 mm 18.9 mm 2.1 kg355 mm 235 mm 19.9 mm 2 kg354 mm 220 mm 18 mm 1.6 kg
Linkerkant: ventilatoropening, een USB 3.1 Gen1 port, gecombineerde audiopoort
Linkerkant: ventilatoropening, een USB 3.1 Gen1 port, gecombineerde audiopoort
Rechterkant: SD kaartlezer, een USB 3.1 Gen1 port, een USB 3.1 Gen2 Type-C port, HDMI-uit, stroomaansluiting
Rechterkant: SD kaartlezer, een USB 3.1 Gen1 port, een USB 3.1 Gen2 Type-C port, HDMI-uit, stroomaansluiting
SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
HP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EA
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
152.1 MB/s ∼100% +132%
Lenovo ThinkPad T580-20L9001AUS
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
75.1 MB/s ∼49% +14%
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
65.6 MB/s ∼43%
Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX580GE
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 UHS-II)
64.2 MB/s ∼42% -2%
Average of class Multimedia
  (11.2 - 190, n=160)
57.2 MB/s ∼38% -13%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
HP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EA
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
210 MB/s ∼100% +169%
Lenovo ThinkPad T580-20L9001AUS
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
84.5 MB/s ∼40% +8%
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
78 MB/s ∼37%
Average of class Multimedia
  (10.2 - 253, n=157)
74.2 MB/s ∼35% -5%
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Razer Blade 15 Base Model
Intel Wireless-AC 9260
666 MBit/s ∼100% +2%
Lenovo ThinkPad T580-20L9001AUS
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
664 MBit/s ∼100% +2%
Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX580GE
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
662 MBit/s ∼99% +2%
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
651 (min: 547, max: 681) MBit/s ∼98%
Average of class Multimedia
  (44 - 949, n=119)
498 MBit/s ∼75% -24%
HP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EA
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
362 MBit/s ∼54% -44%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Razer Blade 15 Base Model
Intel Wireless-AC 9260
653 MBit/s ∼100% +1%
HP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EA
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
649 MBit/s ∼99% +1%
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
644 (min: 499, max: 661) MBit/s ∼99%
Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX580GE
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
584 MBit/s ∼89% -9%
Average of class Multimedia
  (46.1 - 949, n=118)
472 MBit/s ∼72% -27%
Lenovo ThinkPad T580-20L9001AUS
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
124 MBit/s ∼19% -81%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø650 (547-681)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø643 (499-661)
323
cd/m²
334
cd/m²
332
cd/m²
294
cd/m²
311
cd/m²
291
cd/m²
281
cd/m²
291
cd/m²
272
cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 334 cd/m² Gemiddelde: 303.2 cd/m² Minimum: 17.1 cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling: 81 %
Helderheid in Batterij-modus: 311 cd/m²
Contrast: 1296:1 (Zwart: 0.24 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.1 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.2, calibrated: 2.48
ΔE Greyscale 4.93 | 0.64-98 Ø6.4
88% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 58% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.44
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD
BOE07D8, , 1920x1080, 15.6
Razer Blade 15 Base Model
BOE NV156FHM-N61, , 1920x1080, 15.6
Lenovo ThinkPad T580-20L9001AUS
B156HAK02.0, , 1920x1080, 15.6
HP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EA
AUO30EB, , 3840x2160, 15.6
Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX580GE
AU Optronics B156ZAN03.1, , 3840x2160, 15.6
Response Times
9%
26%
-1%
20%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
45 (21, 24)
39.2 (19.6, 19.6)
13%
33.2 (15.6, 17.6)
26%
56 (26, 30)
-24%
44 (22, 22)
2%
Response Time Black / White *
37 (23, 14)
35.2 (20.4, 14.8)
5%
27.6 (14.8, 12.8)
25%
29 (14, 15)
22%
22.8 (12, 10.8)
38%
PWM Frequency
21190 (99)
Screen
-2%
-26%
7%
3%
Brightness middle
311
273.6
-12%
254.5
-18%
440
41%
357.6
15%
Brightness
303
262
-14%
238
-21%
389
28%
350
16%
Brightness Distribution
81
86
6%
87
7%
83
2%
85
5%
Black Level *
0.24
0.3
-25%
0.27
-13%
0.34
-42%
0.35
-46%
Contrast
1296
912
-30%
943
-27%
1294
0%
1022
-21%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
5.1
3.22
37%
4.58
10%
5.04
1%
4.12
19%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
8.91
7.61
15%
17.99
-102%
6.99
22%
9.91
-11%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
2.48
4.1
-65%
4.34
-75%
2.04
18%
4.23
-71%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
4.93
1.4
72%
3.3
33%
4.98
-1%
1.8
63%
Gamma
2.44 90%
2.24 98%
2.403 92%
2.48 89%
2.17 101%
CCT
7641 85%
6636 98%
6355 102%
7777 84%
6613 98%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
58
56.4
-3%
35
-40%
61
5%
87.5
51%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
88
86.2
-2%
55
-37%
94
7%
100
14%
Totaal Gemiddelde (Programma / Instellingen)
4% / -0%
0% / -18%
3% / 6%
12% / 6%

* ... kleiner is beter

Responstijd Scherm

De responstijden van het scherm tonen hoe snel het scherm in staat is om van één kleur naar de andere te veranderen. Trage responstijden kunnen aanleiding geven tot 'nabeelden' rond bewegende objecten of het scherm wazig maken (blur). Vooral spelers van snelle 3D-games hebben baat bij een scherm met snelle responstijden.
       Responstijd Zwart naar Wit
37 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd↗ 23 ms stijging
↘ 14 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde trage responstijden in onze tests en is misschien te traag voor games.
Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.8 (minimum) tot 240 (maximum) ms. » 93 % van alle toestellen zijn beter.
Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd slechter is dan het gemiddelde (25.5 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.
       Responstijd 50% Grijs naar 80% Grijs
45 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd↗ 21 ms stijging
↘ 24 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde trage responstijden in onze tests en is misschien te traag voor games.
Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.9 (minimum) tot 636 (maximum) ms. » 69 % van alle toestellen zijn beter.
Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd slechter is dan het gemiddelde (40.7 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Om de schermhelderheid te verlagen schakelen sommige laptops het backlight erg snel aan en uit. Dit gebeurt aan een dergelijk hoge frequentie dat het niet zichtbaar is voor het menselijk oog. Als de frequentie te laag is kunnen personen met gevoelige ogen geïrriteerd geraken, hoofdpijn krijgen en zelfs flickering waarnemen.
Screen flickering / PWM niet waargenomen

Ter vergelijking: 52 % van alle geteste toestellen maakten geen gebruik van PWM om de schermhelderheid te verlagen. Als het wel werd gebruikt, werd een gemiddelde van 9813 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz waargenomen.

 
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700710720730740750760770780790800810820830840850860870880890900910920930Tooltip
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD Intel Core i7-8565U, Intel Core i7-8565U: Ø704 (683.27-815.1)
Razer Blade 15 Base Model Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø864 (856.88-926.63)
Lenovo ThinkPad T580-20L9001AUS Intel Core i7-8650U, Intel Core i7-8650U: Ø482 (448.21-590.42)
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX580GE
Intel Core i9-8950HK
191 Points ∼100% 0%
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD
Intel Core i7-8565U
191 Points ∼100%
HP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EA
Intel Core i7-8750H
177 Points ∼93% -7%
Razer Blade 15 Base Model
Intel Core i7-8750H
175 Points ∼92% -8%
Average Intel Core i7-8565U
  (138 - 191, n=17)
173 Points ∼91% -9%
Lenovo ThinkPad T580-20L9001AUS
Intel Core i7-8650U
166 Points ∼87% -13%
Average of class Multimedia
  (36 - 191, n=344)
125 Points ∼65% -35%
CPU Multi 64Bit
HP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EA
Intel Core i7-8750H
1131 Points ∼100% +39%
Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX580GE
Intel Core i9-8950HK
1074 Points ∼95% +32%
Razer Blade 15 Base Model
Intel Core i7-8750H
923 Points ∼82% +13%
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD
Intel Core i7-8565U
815 Points ∼72%
Average Intel Core i7-8565U
  (543 - 815, n=18)
619 Points ∼55% -24%
Lenovo ThinkPad T580-20L9001AUS
Intel Core i7-8650U
605 Points ∼53% -26%
Average of class Multimedia
  (73 - 1550, n=357)
467 Points ∼41% -43%
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
23118
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
1803
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
2682
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
7.4 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
0.65 Points
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
20.54 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
119.91 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
815 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
191 Points
Help
PCMark 10
Digital Content Creation
Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX580GE
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 8950HK, Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0)
5802 Points ∼100% +38%
Razer Blade 15 Base Model
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
5417 Points ∼93% +29%
HP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EA
GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, 8750H, Toshiba XG5-P KXG50PNV2T04
4920 Points ∼85% +17%
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD
GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, 8565U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
4204 Points ∼72%
Average Intel Core i7-8565U, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
  (3905 - 4204, n=2)
4055 Points ∼70% -4%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1511 - 5823, n=76)
3675 Points ∼63% -13%
Lenovo ThinkPad T580-20L9001AUS
UHD Graphics 620, 8650U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
3050 Points ∼53% -27%
Productivity
Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX580GE
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 8950HK, Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0)
8020 Points ∼100% +17%
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD
GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, 8565U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
6879 Points ∼86%
Razer Blade 15 Base Model
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
6855 Points ∼85% 0%
Lenovo ThinkPad T580-20L9001AUS
UHD Graphics 620, 8650U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
6809 Points ∼85% -1%
HP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EA
GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, 8750H, Toshiba XG5-P KXG50PNV2T04
6770 Points ∼84% -2%
Average Intel Core i7-8565U, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
  (6120 - 6879, n=2)
6500 Points ∼81% -6%
Average of class Multimedia
  (3113 - 8020, n=77)
6034 Points ∼75% -12%
Essentials
Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX580GE
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 8950HK, Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0)
8971 Points ∼100% +9%
Razer Blade 15 Base Model
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
8577 Points ∼96% +4%
HP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EA
GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, 8750H, Toshiba XG5-P KXG50PNV2T04
8281 Points ∼92% +1%
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD
GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, 8565U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
8233 Points ∼92%
Lenovo ThinkPad T580-20L9001AUS
UHD Graphics 620, 8650U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
7951 Points ∼89% -3%
Average Intel Core i7-8565U, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
  (7378 - 8233, n=2)
7806 Points ∼87% -5%
Average of class Multimedia
  (3733 - 9360, n=77)
7259 Points ∼81% -12%
Score
Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX580GE
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 8950HK, Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0)
5358 Points ∼100% +21%
Razer Blade 15 Base Model
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
4896 Points ∼91% +10%
HP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EA
GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, 8750H, Toshiba XG5-P KXG50PNV2T04
4666 Points ∼87% +5%
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD
GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, 8565U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
4443 Points ∼83%
Average Intel Core i7-8565U, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
  (4020 - 4443, n=2)
4232 Points ∼79% -5%
Lenovo ThinkPad T580-20L9001AUS
UHD Graphics 620, 8650U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
3933 Points ∼73% -11%
Average of class Multimedia
  (2046 - 5358, n=77)
3861 Points ∼72% -13%
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Razer Blade 15 Base Model
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
5395 Points ∼100% 0%
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD
GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, 8565U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
5381 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i7-8565U, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
  (4905 - 5381, n=2)
5143 Points ∼95% -4%
Lenovo ThinkPad T580-20L9001AUS
UHD Graphics 620, 8650U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
5038 Points ∼93% -6%
HP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EA
GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, 8750H, Toshiba XG5-P KXG50PNV2T04
4643 Points ∼86% -14%
Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX580GE
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 8950HK, Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0)
4456 Points ∼83% -17%
Average of class Multimedia
  (2213 - 5651, n=262)
4258 Points ∼79% -21%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Razer Blade 15 Base Model
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
4425 Points ∼100% +9%
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD
GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, 8565U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
4052 Points ∼92%
Average Intel Core i7-8565U, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
  (3801 - 4052, n=2)
3927 Points ∼89% -3%
Lenovo ThinkPad T580-20L9001AUS
UHD Graphics 620, 8650U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
3728 Points ∼84% -8%
Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX580GE
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 8950HK, Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0)
3661 Points ∼83% -10%
HP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EA
GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, 8750H, Toshiba XG5-P KXG50PNV2T04
3433 Points ∼78% -15%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1740 - 4693, n=282)
3366 Points ∼76% -17%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
4052 punten
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
5381 punten
Help
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
Razer Blade 15 Base Model
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
Lenovo ThinkPad T580-20L9001AUS
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
HP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EA
Toshiba XG5-P KXG50PNV2T04
Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX580GE
Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0)
Average WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
 
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
22%
-4%
-1%
17%
1%
Write 4K
126.2
112.5
-11%
122.1
-3%
94.81
-25%
125
-1%
117 (98.2 - 126, n=4)
-7%
Read 4K
41.2
43.09
5%
44.61
8%
26.45
-36%
44.68
8%
42 (39.4 - 44.1, n=4)
2%
Write Seq
1055
1450
37%
825.7
-22%
1037
-2%
1059
0%
1092 (753 - 1386, n=4)
4%
Read Seq
883.8
1392
58%
810.6
-8%
1280
45%
771.7
-13%
1115 (884 - 1336, n=4)
26%
Write 4K Q32T1
445.5
356.1
-20%
293.9
-34%
277.6
-38%
506.6
14%
371 (258 - 510, n=4)
-17%
Read 4K Q32T1
338.8
406.9
20%
374.8
11%
333.9
-1%
614
81%
336 (326 - 340, n=4)
-1%
Write Seq Q32T1
1453
1451
0%
1714
18%
1037
-29%
1763
21%
1454 (1453 - 1455, n=4)
0%
Read Seq Q32T1
1734
3272
89%
1772
2%
3135
81%
2171
25%
1721 (1681 - 1741, n=4)
-1%
Write 4K Q8T8
1043.5
Read 4K Q8T8
913.6
AS SSD
31%
46%
26%
69%
20%
Copy Game MB/s
1069.77
1129.32
728.25
930
Copy Program MB/s
495.54
395.41
430.94
415
Copy ISO MB/s
1891.98
2507.07
1045.16
1153
Score Total
2845
2952
4%
3587
26%
2768
-3%
4065
43%
3021 (2696 - 3294, n=4)
6%
Score Write
1220
1499
23%
1564
28%
1153
-5%
1547
27%
1302 (1075 - 1515, n=4)
7%
Score Read
1075
970
-10%
1336
24%
1120
4%
1679
56%
1134 (1075 - 1224, n=4)
5%
Access Time Write *
0.027
0.04
-48%
0.035
-30%
0.056
-107%
0.036
-33%
0.0298 (0.024 - 0.036, n=4)
-10%
Access Time Read *
0.08
0.113
-41%
0.047
41%
0.051
36%
0.04
50%
0.0793 (0.05 - 0.129, n=4)
1%
4K-64 Write
1047.43
1269.69
21%
1325.22
27%
953.17
-9%
1272.75
22%
1079 (871 - 1285, n=4)
3%
4K-64 Read
974.82
748.68
-23%
1139.74
17%
855.74
-12%
1431.02
47%
991 (916 - 1044, n=4)
2%
4K Write
131.57
92.98
-29%
106.22
-19%
105.36
-20%
100.89
-23%
127 (104 - 162, n=4)
-3%
4K Read
41.81
40.75
-3%
50.78
21%
19.07
-54%
37.78
-10%
41.4 (40 - 43.3, n=4)
-1%
Seq Write
411.81
1366.97
232%
1324.07
222%
948.36
130%
1728.67
320%
962 (412 - 1261, n=4)
134%
Seq Read
578.98
1802.55
211%
1453.55
151%
2454.1
324%
2098.63
262%
1014 (579 - 1372, n=4)
75%
Totaal Gemiddelde (Programma / Instellingen)
27% / 27%
21% / 25%
13% / 15%
43% / 47%
11% / 12%

* ... kleiner is beter

WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
Sequential Read: 899.7 MB/s
Sequential Write: 1050 MB/s
512K Read: 451.7 MB/s
512K Write: 791.4 MB/s
4K Read: 39.15 MB/s
4K Write: 115.1 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 300.5 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 412.3 MB/s
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Razer Blade 15 Base Model
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H
14351 Points ∼100% +105%
Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX580GE
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), Intel Core i9-8950HK
8854 Points ∼62% +26%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
  (6874 - 7385, n=3)
7092 Points ∼49% +1%
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8565U
7016 Points ∼49%
HP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EA
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H
6874 Points ∼48% -2%
Average of class Multimedia
  (352 - 18234, n=612)
2834 Points ∼20% -60%
Lenovo ThinkPad T580-20L9001AUS
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-8650U
1802 Points ∼13% -74%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Razer Blade 15 Base Model
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H
11366 Points ∼100% +102%
Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX580GE
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), Intel Core i9-8950HK
7291 Points ∼64% +30%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
  (5622 - 5792, n=3)
5697 Points ∼50% +1%
HP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EA
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H
5677 Points ∼50% +1%
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8565U
5622 Points ∼49%
Average of class Multimedia
  (337 - 14463, n=389)
2753 Points ∼24% -51%
Lenovo ThinkPad T580-20L9001AUS
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-8650U
1118 Points ∼10% -80%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Razer Blade 15 Base Model
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H
81720 Points ∼100% +128%
Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX580GE
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), Intel Core i9-8950HK
43721 Points ∼54% +22%
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8565U
35858 Points ∼44%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
  (34926 - 36630, n=3)
35805 Points ∼44% 0%
HP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EA
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H
34926 Points ∼43% -3%
Average of class Multimedia
  (2468 - 77755, n=391)
16346 Points ∼20% -54%
Lenovo ThinkPad T580-20L9001AUS
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-8650U
8948 Points ∼11% -75%
3DMark 06 Standard
9694 punten
3DMark 11 Performance
7116 punten
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
17993 punten
3DMark Fire Strike Score
5209 punten
Help
The Witcher 3
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Razer Blade 15 Base Model
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q
38.5 fps ∼100% +28%
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD
Intel Core i7-8565U, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
30 fps ∼78%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
  (18.5 - 30, n=2)
24.3 fps ∼63% -19%
Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX580GE
Intel Core i9-8950HK, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop)
24.2 fps ∼63% -19%
HP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EA
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
18.5 fps ∼48% -38%
Average of class Multimedia
  (2.9 - 51.5, n=82)
18.5 fps ∼48% -38%
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Razer Blade 15 Base Model
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q
71.4 fps ∼100% +74%
Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX580GE
Intel Core i9-8950HK, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop)
44.6 fps ∼62% +9%
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD
Intel Core i7-8565U, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
41 fps ∼57%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
  (34 - 41, n=2)
37.5 fps ∼53% -9%
HP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EA
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
34 fps ∼48% -17%
Average of class Multimedia
  (3.8 - 93.2, n=92)
27.6 fps ∼39% -33%
1366x768 Medium Graphics & Postprocessing
Razer Blade 15 Base Model
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q
134.7 fps ∼100% +125%
Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX580GE
Intel Core i9-8950HK, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop)
88.3 fps ∼66% +47%
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD
Intel Core i7-8565U, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
60 fps ∼45%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
  (59.3 - 60, n=2)
59.7 fps ∼44% 0%
HP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EA
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
59.3 fps ∼44% -1%
Average of class Multimedia
  (5.2 - 157, n=94)
41 fps ∼30% -32%
1024x768 Low Graphics & Postprocessing
Razer Blade 15 Base Model
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q
204.9 fps ∼100% +220%
HP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EA
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
103.2 fps ∼50% +61%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
  (64 - 103, n=2)
83.6 fps ∼41% +31%
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD
Intel Core i7-8565U, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
64 fps ∼31%
Average of class Multimedia
  (8.9 - 219, n=96)
58.8 fps ∼29% -8%
05101520253035Tooltip
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, 8565U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G; The Witcher 3: Ø27.5 (26-30)
lage gem. hoge ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 26625215059fps
Thief (2014) 106766638fps
The Witcher 3 (2015) 64604130fps
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 98623629fps

Geluidsniveau

Onbelast
30.5 / 30.5 / 30.5 dB (A)
Belasting
40.8 / 41.8 dB (A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
stil
40 dB(A)
hoorbaar
50 dB(A)
luid
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm afstand)   environment noise: 30.5 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2033.133.332.833.12532.332.729.432.33131.932.230.631.94030.329.93030.35028.232.128.828.26327.827.126.127.88027.427.127.627.410026.12825.626.112525.924.924.825.916024.824.323.924.820024.323.722.424.325023.422.421.723.431522.522.921.222.540023.123.220.223.150023.723.519.423.763024.124.718.924.180025.926.217.725.9100029.830.217.729.8125027.929.617.727.9160029.329.417.629.3200030.13117.730.1250030.731.517.530.7315031.433.418.131.440003031.518.230500030.331.618.330.3630027.927.918.627.9800023.423.918.923.41000020.521.21920.51250019.719.91919.71600020.219.619.420.2SPL40.841.930.540.8N3.33.51.33.3median 25.9median 24.9median 18.9median 25.9Delta2.93.41.82.9hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseAsus ZenBook 15 UX533FD
Max. Belasting
 42.8 °C47.2 °C43.9 °C 
 37.9 °C44.5 °C31.7 °C 
 30.6 °C27.7 °C29.7 °C 
Maximum: 47.2 °C
Gemiddelde: 37.3 °C
38.6 °C40.2 °C43.2 °C
32.6 °C38.6 °C37.9 °C
28.7 °C31.1 °C32.4 °C
Maximum: 43.2 °C
Gemiddelde: 35.9 °C
Stroomadapter (max.)  46.3 °C | Kamertemperatuur 22.7 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 37.3 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 30.9 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Multimedia.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 47.2 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 36.5 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43.2 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 38.8 °C / 102 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.5 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 30.9 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30.6 °C / 87.1 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 29.1 °C / 84.4 F (-1.5 °C / -2.7 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2036.932.836.92535.429.435.43142.230.642.24036.53036.55033.828.833.86328.426.128.48027.327.627.310025.825.625.812526.424.826.416028.823.928.820038.822.438.825055.721.755.731564.321.264.340067.620.267.650065.719.465.763066.518.966.580070.517.770.5100070.517.770.5125071.517.771.5160072.917.672.9200073.617.773.6250071.817.571.8315067.518.167.5400070.118.270.1500076.918.376.9630080.318.680.3800078.618.978.61000072.81972.81250076.51976.51600071.719.471.7SPL86.230.586.2N60.91.360.9median 70.5median 18.9median 70.5Delta8.31.88.335.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6median 17.84.62.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseAsus ZenBook 15 UX533FDApple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.33 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 62% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 28% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 18%, worst was 41%
Compared to all devices tested
» 43% of all tested devices were better, 9% similar, 48% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 8%, average was 20%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Stroomgebruik
Uit / Standbydarklight 0.48 / 0.8 Watt
Inactiefdarkmidlight 2.7 / 8 / 10.6 Watt
Belasting midlight 74 / 89 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD
8565U, GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Razer Blade 15 Base Model
8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Lenovo ThinkPad T580-20L9001AUS
8650U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
HP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EA
8750H, GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, Toshiba XG5-P KXG50PNV2T04, IPS LED, 3840x2160, 15.6
Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX580GE
8950HK, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0), IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
 
Average of class Multimedia
 
Power Consumption
-99%
0%
-46%
-127%
-28%
-98%
Idle Minimum *
2.7
10.2
-278%
4.7
-74%
6.1
-126%
11.7
-333%
5.2 (2.7 - 6.8, n=3)
-93%
11.7 (2.1 - 101, n=913)
-333%
Idle Average *
8
13.2
-65%
7.9
1%
10.2
-28%
18.5
-131%
9.33 (8 - 10.2, n=3)
-17%
16.2 (4.2 - 122, n=913)
-103%
Idle Maximum *
10.6
17.6
-66%
11.4
-8%
13.4
-26%
22.8
-115%
11.8 (10.6 - 13.4, n=3)
-11%
19.8 (4.7 - 181, n=913)
-87%
Load Average *
74
99.5
-34%
47.2
36%
82
-11%
97.5
-32%
77.3 (74 - 82, n=3)
-4%
59.9 (18.5 - 164, n=892)
19%
Load Maximum *
89
133.3
-50%
48.1
46%
122
-37%
111.1
-25%
101 (89 - 122, n=3)
-13%
78 (20.1 - 329, n=897)
12%
Witcher 3 ultra *
113.6
102.9

* ... kleiner is beter

Batterijduur
Inactief (zonder WLAN, minimale helderheid)
26h 27min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
8h 39min
Belast (maximale helderheid)
2h 51min
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD
8565U, GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, 73 Wh
Razer Blade 15 Base Model
8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 65 Wh
Lenovo ThinkPad T580-20L9001AUS
8650U, UHD Graphics 620, 56 Wh
HP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EA
8750H, GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, 96 Wh
Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX580GE
8950HK, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 71 Wh
Average of class Multimedia
 
Batterijduur
-47%
-51%
-20%
-44%
-52%
Reader / Idle
1587
690
-57%
1027
-35%
842
-47%
398 (73 - 1810, n=874)
-75%
WiFi v1.3
519
330
-36%
252
-51%
523
1%
375
-28%
354 (96 - 942, n=229)
-32%
Load
171
87
-49%
128
-25%
76
-56%
85.1 (32 - 238, n=874)
-50%

Pro

+ lange batterijlevensduur
+ goed geluidsbeheer en thermisch beheer
+ goede systeemprestaties
+ ook geschikt voor gamen
+ onderhoudsmogelijkheden

Contra

- zeer weerspiegelend beeldscherm
Getest: Asus ZenBook 15. Testmodel geleverd door Asus Germany
Getest: Asus ZenBook 15. Testmodel geleverd door Asus Germany

Voor het volledige, Engelse testrapport, klik hier.

In ons testrapport heeft de Asus ZenBook 15 zichzelf bewezen als een zeer krachtige, zeer mobiele notebook die huidige videogames kan draaien. Door de slanke behuizing, de lange batterijlevensduur en het lage gewicht is de Asus-notebook des te meer geschikt voor gebruik onderweg. Wie echter de ZenBook 15 voor gaming wil gebruiken, moet een stopcontact bij de hand houden.

De Asus ZenBook 15 is een compacte gaming-notebook die alle nieuwste games aankan. Bovendien blinkt het apparaat ook uit als het gaat om de batterijlevensduur.

Met de ZenBook 15 levert Asus een apparaat met zeer goede hardware dat aan de behoeften van de meeste gebruikers kan voldoen. De ontbrekende poorten kunnen worden gerepliceerd met behulp van de USB 3.1 Gen2 Type-C-poort en de SSD kan indien nodig worden vervangen. Er zijn geen andere upgrade-opties. Gezien het feit dat ons beoordelingsapparaat wordt geleverd met 16 GB RAM, wordt dit een beetje een betwistbaar punt. Dankzij de Max-Q-technologie van Nvidia kan Asus de temperaturen onder controle houden. Er zijn geen prestatiedalingen tijdens het gamen.

Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD - 14-02-2019 v6
Mike Wobker

Behuizing
82 / 98 → 83%
Toetsenbord
82%
Aanwijsapparaat
82%
Aansluitmogelijkheden
48 / 81 → 60%
Gewicht
68 / 20-67 → 100%
Batterij
91%
Beeldscherm
82%
Gaming-performance
88 / 85 → 100%
Applicatie-performance
92 / 92 → 100%
Temperatuur
90%
Luidheid
87 / 95 → 92%
Audio
60%
Camera
45 / 85 → 53%
Gemiddelde
77%
86%
Multimedia - Gewogen Gemiddelde

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Overzichten en testrapporten over laptops en mobieltjes > Testrapporten > Kort testrapport Asus ZenBook 15 (i7-8565U, GTX1050 Max-Q) Laptop
Mike Wobker, 2019-02-14 (Update: 2019-02-14)