Notebookcheck

Kort testrapport Asus ROG Zephyrus S15 GX502L laptop: Gaming-laptop geüpdatet naar Comet Lake

Het wordt nu Super. De nieuwe editie van de slanke Zephyrus S15 van Asus wordt niet alleen geleverd met verbeterde hardware, maar heeft nu ook een 300 Hz-paneel. In ons testrapport zullen we duidelijk maken hoe goed dit werkt in combinatie met de ingebouwde Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 Super.
Mike Wobker, 👁 Florian Glaser,
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L
Processor
Intel Core i7-10875H 8 x 2.3 - 5.1 GHz, Comet Lake-H
Grafische kaart
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile - 8192 MB, Core: 1140 MHz, Geheugen: 1750 MHz, NVIDIA 451.67, Intel UHD Graphics
Geheugen
32768 MB 
, dual-channel DDR4 3200
Beeldscherm
15.6 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, B156HAN12.0 (AUOBC8C), IPS, glimmend: nee, 300 Hz
Moederbord
Intel HM470
Opslag
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00, 1024 GB 
, 870 GB beschikbaar
Geluidskaart
Intel Comet Lake PCH-H - cAVS
Verbindingen
2 USB 3.0, 2 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Verbindingen: 1x 3.5-mm audio-input, 1x 3.5-mm audio-output
Netwerkmogelijkheden
Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000/2500/5000MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5.1
Afmetingen
hoogte x breedte x diepte (in mm): 19 x 360 x 252
Batterij
76 Wh Lithium-Ion
Besturingssysteem
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
Bijkomende functionaliteiten
Luidsprekers: stereo, Toetsenbord: chiclet, Toetsenbordverlichting: ja, 240-Watt-voeding, 65-watt USB Type-C-voeding, 24 Maanden Garantie
Gewicht
2.089 kg, Voeding: 608 g
Prijs
2,600 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Evaluatie
Datum
Model
Gewicht
Hoogte
Formaat
Resolutie
Best Price
83 %
09-2020
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L
i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
2.1 kg19 mm15.6"1920x1080
81 %
05-2019
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
2.1 kg19 mm15.6"1920x1080
85 %
07-2020
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS
i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
2.4 kg23 mm15.6"1920x1080
87 %
08-2020
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
2.1 kg17.8 mm15.6"1920x1080
87 %
08-2020
Aorus 15G XB
i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
2.3 kg25 mm15.6"1920x1080
Asus ROG Zephyrus S15 GX502L
Asus ROG Zephyrus S15 GX502L
Asus ROG Zephyrus S15 GX502L
Asus ROG Zephyrus S15 GX502L
Asus ROG Zephyrus S15 GX502L
Asus ROG Zephyrus S15 GX502L
Asus ROG Zephyrus S15 GX502L
Links: Voeding, Gigabit LAN, HDMI, 1x USB 3.1 Gen 2, 1x 3.5-mm-microfoon, 1x 3.5-mm-koptelefoon
Links: Voeding, Gigabit LAN, HDMI, 1x USB 3.1 Gen 2, 1x 3.5-mm-microfoon, 1x 3.5-mm-koptelefoon
Rechts: 1x Thunderbolt 3 (DP inbegrepen), 2x USB 3.1 Gen 1, Kensington lock
Rechts: 1x Thunderbolt 3 (DP inbegrepen), 2x USB 3.1 Gen 1, Kensington lock
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter (201NGW)
1670 MBit/s ∼100% +18%
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1420 MBit/s ∼85%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1394 (843min - 1528max) MBit/s ∼83% -2%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
  (289 - 1722, n=104)
1217 MBit/s ∼73% -14%
Aorus 15G XB
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)
1120 MBit/s ∼67% -21%
Average of class Gaming
  (141 - 1670, n=357)
746 MBit/s ∼45% -47%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
680 MBit/s ∼41% -52%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Aorus 15G XB
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)
1370 MBit/s ∼100% +5%
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1310 MBit/s ∼96%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1240 (619min - 1284max) MBit/s ∼91% -5%
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter (201NGW)
1150 MBit/s ∼84% -12%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
  (49.8 - 1775, n=104)
1086 MBit/s ∼79% -17%
Average of class Gaming
  (144 - 1645, n=357)
687 MBit/s ∼50% -48%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
683 MBit/s ∼50% -48%
278
cd/m²
287
cd/m²
274
cd/m²
287
cd/m²
283
cd/m²
286
cd/m²
298
cd/m²
306
cd/m²
298
cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling
B156HAN12.0 (AUOBC8C)
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 306 cd/m² Gemiddelde: 288.6 cd/m² Minimum: 14 cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling: 90 %
Helderheid in Batterij-modus: 283 cd/m²
Contrast: 1179:1 (Zwart: 0.24 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.26 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.8, calibrated: 1.11
ΔE Greyscale 3.4 | 0.64-98 Ø6
93% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 71% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.228
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L
B156HAN12.0 (AUOBC8C), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
AU Optronics B156HAN08.2 (AUO82ED), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS
Sharp LQ156M1JW03 (SHP14C5), IPS-Level, 1920x1080, 15.6
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
AU Optronics B156HAN12.0, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Aorus 15G XB
Sharp LQ156M1JW03, IGZO, 1920x1080, 15.6
Response Times
29%
-13%
47%
-16%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
14 (6.8, 7.2)
7.2 (3.8, 3.4)
49%
16.4 (6.8, 7.6)
-17%
3.2 (1.4, 1.8)
77%
16 (8.4, 7.6)
-14%
Response Time Black / White *
9.6 (5.2, 4.4)
8.8 (4.4, 4.4)
8%
10.4 (6, 4.4)
-8%
8 (4, 4)
17%
11.2 (6.8, 4.4)
-17%
PWM Frequency
23580 (19)
23580 (24)
Screen
-14%
13%
-13%
8%
Brightness middle
283
286
1%
291
3%
345.4
22%
264
-7%
Brightness
289
275
-5%
278
-4%
342
18%
248
-14%
Brightness Distribution
90
90
0%
91
1%
90
0%
89
-1%
Black Level *
0.24
0.37
-54%
0.25
-4%
0.34
-42%
0.3
-25%
Contrast
1179
773
-34%
1164
-1%
1016
-14%
880
-25%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
2.26
2.19
3%
1.19
47%
3.18
-41%
1.21
46%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
5.64
4.4
22%
3.04
46%
6.57
-16%
3.07
46%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
1.11
2.27
-105%
1.77
-59%
0.92
17%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
3.4
2.2
35%
1.9
44%
3.8
-12%
1.6
53%
Gamma
2.228 99%
2.41 91%
2.216 99%
2.15 102%
2.192 100%
CCT
7249 90%
6405 101%
7018 93%
7109 91%
6340 103%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
71
59
-17%
70
-1%
64.3
-9%
68
-4%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
93
91
-2%
92
-1%
99
6%
90
-3%
Totaal Gemiddelde (Programma / Instellingen)
8% / -8%
0% / 9%
17% / -4%
-4% / 4%

* ... kleiner is beter

Responstijd Scherm

De responstijden van het scherm tonen hoe snel het scherm in staat is om van één kleur naar de andere te veranderen. Trage responstijden kunnen aanleiding geven tot 'nabeelden' rond bewegende objecten of het scherm wazig maken (blur). Vooral spelers van snelle 3D-games hebben baat bij een scherm met snelle responstijden.
       Responstijd Zwart naar Wit
9.6 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd↗ 5.2 ms stijging
↘ 4.4 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde snelle responstijden in onze tests en zou geschikt moeten zijn voor games.
Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.8 (minimum) tot 240 (maximum) ms. » 10 % van alle toestellen zijn beter.
Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd beter is dan het gemiddelde (24.4 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.
       Responstijd 50% Grijs naar 80% Grijs
14 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd↗ 6.8 ms stijging
↘ 7.2 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde prima responstijden in onze tests maar is misschien wat te traag voor competitieve games.
Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.8 (minimum) tot 636 (maximum) ms. » 11 % van alle toestellen zijn beter.
Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd beter is dan het gemiddelde (38.7 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Om de schermhelderheid te verlagen schakelen sommige laptops het backlight erg snel aan en uit. Dit gebeurt aan een dergelijk hoge frequentie dat het niet zichtbaar is voor het menselijk oog. Als de frequentie te laag is kunnen personen met gevoelige ogen geïrriteerd geraken, hoofdpijn krijgen en zelfs flickering waarnemen.
Screen flickering / PWM niet waargenomen

Ter vergelijking: 51 % van alle geteste toestellen maakten geen gebruik van PWM om de schermhelderheid te verlagen. Als het wel werd gebruikt, werd een gemiddelde van 17553 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 2500000) Hz waargenomen.

CPUz - CPU
CPUz - Caches
CPUz - Mainboard
CPUz - Memory
HWiNFO
GPUz
0100200300400500600700800900100011001200130014001500160017001800Tooltip
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L Intel Core i7-10875H, Intel Core i7-10875H: Ø1627 (1603.72-1663.62)
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1040 (1017.76-1182)
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS Intel Core i9-10980HK, Intel Core i9-10980HK: Ø1610 (1581.15-1708.45)
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q Intel Core i7-10875H, Intel Core i7-10875H: Ø1366 (1323.8-1373.01)
Aorus 15G XB Intel Core i7-10875H, Intel Core i7-10875H: Ø1613 (1597.32-1826.4)
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
206 Points ∼100% +7%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H
  (190 - 214, n=26)
203 Points ∼99% +6%
Aorus 15G XB
Intel Core i7-10875H
202 Points ∼98% +5%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
Intel Core i7-10875H
202 Points ∼98% +5%
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L
Intel Core i7-10875H
192 Points ∼93%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
Intel Core i7-9750H
177 Points ∼86% -8%
Average of class Gaming
  (77 - 219, n=622)
162 Points ∼79% -16%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Aorus 15G XB
Intel Core i7-10875H
1826 Points ∼100% +10%
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
1708 (1581.15min - 1708.45max) Points ∼94% +3%
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L
Intel Core i7-10875H
1664 (1603.72min - 1663.62max) Points ∼91%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H
  (1111 - 1833, n=26)
1580 Points ∼87% -5%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
Intel Core i7-10875H
1373 (1323.8min - 1373.01max) Points ∼75% -17%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
Intel Core i7-9750H
1182 Points ∼65% -29%
Average of class Gaming
  (196 - 2804, n=627)
925 Points ∼51% -44%
Blender 2.79 - BMW27 CPU
Average of class Gaming
  (179 - 901, n=87)
386 Seconds * ∼100% -48%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
Intel Core i7-10875H
333 Seconds * ∼86% -28%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H
  (261 - 386, n=19)
323 Seconds * ∼84% -24%
Aorus 15G XB
Intel Core i7-10875H
284 Seconds * ∼74% -9%
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
278 Seconds * ∼72% -7%
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L
Intel Core i7-10875H
261 Seconds * ∼68%
7-Zip 18.03
7z b 4
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L
Intel Core i7-10875H
47941 MIPS ∼100%
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
46976 MIPS ∼98% -2%
Aorus 15G XB
Intel Core i7-10875H
46426 MIPS ∼97% -3%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H
  (33674 - 48397, n=20)
42504 MIPS ∼89% -11%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
Intel Core i7-10875H
38667 MIPS ∼81% -19%
Average of class Gaming
  (3034 - 75612, n=88)
37036 MIPS ∼77% -23%
7z b 4 -mmt1
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
5463 MIPS ∼100% +7%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H
  (5114 - 5605, n=20)
5332 MIPS ∼98% +4%
Aorus 15G XB
Intel Core i7-10875H
5319 MIPS ∼97% +4%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
Intel Core i7-10875H
5285 MIPS ∼97% +3%
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L
Intel Core i7-10875H
5114 MIPS ∼94%
Average of class Gaming
  (2480 - 5811, n=88)
4886 MIPS ∼89% -4%
Cinebench R20
CPU (Single Core)
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
Intel Core i7-10875H
488 Points ∼100% +4%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H
  (456 - 511, n=21)
486 Points ∼100% +4%
Aorus 15G XB
Intel Core i7-10875H
482 Points ∼99% +3%
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
476 Points ∼98% +2%
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L
Intel Core i7-10875H
467 Points ∼96%
Average of class Gaming
  (312 - 524, n=133)
450 Points ∼92% -4%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
Intel Core i7-9750H
430 Points ∼88% -8%
CPU (Multi Core)
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L
Intel Core i7-10875H
3907 Points ∼100%
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
3843 Points ∼98% -2%
Aorus 15G XB
Intel Core i7-10875H
3723 Points ∼95% -5%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H
  (2800 - 4133, n=21)
3469 Points ∼89% -11%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
Intel Core i7-10875H
3256 Points ∼83% -17%
Average of class Gaming
  (1397 - 6321, n=134)
2994 Points ∼77% -23%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
Intel Core i7-9750H
2507 Points ∼64% -36%
Geekbench 5.1 / 5.2
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Aorus 15G XB
Intel Core i7-10875H
8190 Points ∼100% +8%
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
8104 Points ∼99% +7%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H
  (6988 - 8620, n=18)
7751 Points ∼95% +2%
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L
Intel Core i7-10875H
7583 Points ∼93%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
Intel Core i7-10875H
7345 Points ∼90% -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (2783 - 11393, n=71)
6574 Points ∼80% -13%
64 Bit Single-Core Score
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
1352 Points ∼100% +9%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H
  (1233 - 1371, n=18)
1298 Points ∼96% +5%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
Intel Core i7-10875H
1287 Points ∼95% +4%
Aorus 15G XB
Intel Core i7-10875H
1281 Points ∼95% +3%
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L
Intel Core i7-10875H
1242 Points ∼92%
Average of class Gaming
  (703 - 1428, n=71)
1217 Points ∼90% -2%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L
Intel Core i7-10875H
13.5 fps ∼100%
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
13 fps ∼96% -4%
Aorus 15G XB
Intel Core i7-10875H
12.8 fps ∼95% -5%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H
  (10.1 - 13.5, n=16)
11.6 fps ∼86% -14%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
Intel Core i7-10875H
11 fps ∼81% -19%
Average of class Gaming
  (1.7 - 19.8, n=87)
10.2 fps ∼76% -24%
LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF
Average of class Gaming
  (23.9 - 95.8, n=64)
56.8 s ∼100% +21%
Aorus 15G XB
Intel Core i7-10875H
55.78 s ∼98% +18%
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
53.4 s ∼94% +13%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H
  (30.2 - 84.3, n=19)
50.8 s ∼89% +8%
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L
Intel Core i7-10875H
47.1 s ∼83%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
Intel Core i7-10875H
46.3 s ∼82% -2%
R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean
Average of class Gaming
  (0.531 - 1.088, n=68)
0.619 sec * ∼100% -4%
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L
Intel Core i7-10875H
0.597 sec * ∼96%
Aorus 15G XB
Intel Core i7-10875H
0.586 sec * ∼95% +2%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H
  (0.547 - 0.662, n=18)
0.584 sec * ∼94% +2%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
Intel Core i7-10875H
0.583 sec * ∼94% +2%
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
0.564 sec * ∼91% +6%

* ... kleiner is beter

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1664 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
130 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
192 Points
Help
PCMark 10 - Score
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
6739 Points ∼100% +24%
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, i9-10980HK, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
6053 Points ∼90% +11%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9750H, 2x Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 (RAID 0)
5654 Points ∼84% +4%
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, i7-10875H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
5447 Points ∼81%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
 
5447 Points ∼81% 0%
Aorus 15G XB
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
5393 Points ∼80% -1%
Average of class Gaming
  (2603 - 7511, n=305)
5329 Points ∼79% -2%
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, i7-10875H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
7107.2 μs * ∼100%
Aorus 15G XB
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
2364.3 μs * ∼33% +67%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
1768.4 μs * ∼25% +75%
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, i9-10980HK, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
935.4 μs * ∼13% +87%

* ... kleiner is beter

Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
2x Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 (RAID 0)
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
Aorus 15G XB
Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
Average WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
 
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
-11%
15%
12%
7%
4%
Write 4K
127.4
97.04
-24%
158.2
24%
139.8
10%
121.6
-5%
143 (108 - 186, n=5)
12%
Read 4K
46.38
49.58
7%
50.66
9%
48.62
5%
44.37
-4%
44.1 (36.5 - 50.7, n=5)
-5%
Write Seq
2034
1838
-10%
1790
-12%
2260
11%
2617
29%
2126 (1790 - 2874, n=5)
5%
Read Seq
2172
2421
11%
2469
14%
2135
-2%
1297
-40%
2056 (1786 - 2469, n=5)
-5%
Write 4K Q32T1
413.7
326.9
-21%
503.2
22%
499.3
21%
499
21%
454 (318 - 570, n=5)
10%
Read 4K Q32T1
354
372.9
5%
578.7
63%
551.8
56%
557.2
57%
439 (299 - 579, n=5)
24%
Write Seq Q32T1
3063
1894
-38%
3102
1%
2960
-3%
2978
-3%
2990 (2602 - 3102, n=5)
-2%
Read Seq Q32T1
3396
2828
-17%
3413
1%
3269
-4%
3360
-1%
3244 (2872 - 3413, n=5)
-4%
AS SSD
-18%
33%
-9%
13%
9%
Score Total
4881
2896
-41%
5673
16%
5103
5%
4685
-4%
4729 (3274 - 5673, n=5)
-3%
Score Write
3011
1528
-49%
2586
-14%
2310
-23%
2344
-22%
2475 (1650 - 3011, n=5)
-18%
Score Read
1292
923
-29%
2055
59%
1840
42%
1513
17%
1514 (1107 - 2055, n=5)
17%
Access Time Write *
0.032
0.04
-25%
0.026
19%
0.112
-250%
0.034
-6%
0.0364 (0.026 - 0.068, n=5)
-14%
Access Time Read *
0.057
0.08
-40%
0.05
12%
0.057
-0%
0.063
-11%
0.0564 (0.05 - 0.068, n=5)
1%
4K-64 Write
2797.35
1253
-55%
2188.39
-22%
2004.71
-28%
1961.92
-30%
2154 (1345 - 2797, n=5)
-23%
4K-64 Read
978.12
623.93
-36%
1710.1
75%
1594.37
63%
1284.1
31%
1208 (789 - 1712, n=5)
24%
4K Write
120.47
103.6
-14%
140
16%
96.51
-20%
109.27
-9%
142 (120 - 165, n=5)
18%
4K Read
42.83
48.32
13%
47.33
11%
50.19
17%
49.67
16%
45.3 (42.6 - 48.6, n=5)
6%
Seq Write
927.83
1711.53
84%
2580.63
178%
2092.37
126%
2724.02
194%
1800 (928 - 2620, n=5)
94%
Seq Read
2713.77
2505.83
-8%
2978.71
10%
1956.71
-28%
1794.68
-34%
2606 (2291 - 2979, n=5)
-4%
Totaal Gemiddelde (Programma / Instellingen)
-15% / -15%
24% / 25%
2% / -0%
10% / 10%
7% / 7%

* ... kleiner is beter

WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3396 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 3063 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 354 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 413.7 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 2172 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 2034 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 46.38 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 127.4 MB/s

Continuous load read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

01020304050607080901001101201301401501601701801902002102202302402502602702802903003103203303403503603703803904004104204304404504604704804905005105205305405505605705805906006106206306406506606706806907007107207307407507607707807908008108208308408508608708808909009109209309409509609709809901000101010201030104010501060107010801090110011101120113011401150116011701180119012001210122012301240125012601270128012901300131013201330134013501360137013801390140014101420143014401450146014701480149015001510152015301540155015601570158015901600161016201630164016501660167016801690170017101720173017401750176017701780179018001810182018301840185018601870188018901900191019201930194019501960197019801990200020102020203020402050206020702080209021002110212021302140215021602170218021902200221022202230224022502260227022802290230023102320233023402350236023702380239024002410242024302440245024602470248024902500251025202530254025502560257025802590260026102620263026402650266026702680269027002710272027302740275027602770278027902800281028202830284028502860287028802890290029102920293029402950296029702980299030003010302030303040305030603070308030903100311031203130314031503160317031803190320032103220323032403250326032703280329033003310332033303340335033603370338033903400341034203430Tooltip
: Ø3421 (3225.63-3428.42)
3DMark
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
  (8134 - 8657, n=7)
8347 Points ∼100% +3%
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
8328 Points ∼100% +2%
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
8134 Points ∼97%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
7891 Points ∼95% -3%
Aorus 15G XB
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
7343 Points ∼88% -10%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
7277 Points ∼87% -11%
Average of class Gaming
  (368 - 13013, n=257)
6035 Points ∼72% -26%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
22836 Points ∼100% +4%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
  (21532 - 23042, n=7)
22290 Points ∼98% +2%
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
21896 Points ∼96%
Aorus 15G XB
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
21150 Points ∼93% -3%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
20831 Points ∼91% -5%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
19123 Points ∼84% -13%
Average of class Gaming
  (385 - 40636, n=642)
12289 Points ∼54% -44%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
141778 Points ∼100% +12%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
133326 Points ∼94% +6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
  (123700 - 141778, n=5)
129261 Points ∼91% +2%
Aorus 15G XB
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
126747 Points ∼89% 0%
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
126287 Points ∼89%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
109473 Points ∼77% -13%
Average of class Gaming
  (5761 - 184578, n=616)
72001 Points ∼51% -43%
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
30309 Points ∼100% +4%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
  (29011 - 31050, n=5)
30022 Points ∼99% +3%
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
29174 Points ∼96%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
28678 Points ∼95% -2%
Aorus 15G XB
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
27715 Points ∼91% -5%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
24267 Points ∼80% -17%
Average of class Gaming
  (513 - 50983, n=721)
14824 Points ∼49% -49%
3DMark 11 Performance
23795 punten
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
48072 punten
3DMark Fire Strike Score
19416 punten
3DMark Time Spy Score
8293 punten
Help
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, i9-10980HK
85.1 (71min) fps ∼100% +12%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
  (76.3 - 93.6, n=8)
84.5 fps ∼99% +11%
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, i7-10875H
76.3 (64min) fps ∼90%
Aorus 15G XB
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H
75.5 (63min) fps ∼89% -1%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H
74 (70min - 78max) fps ∼87% -3%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9750H
70.2 (58min) fps ∼82% -8%
Average of class Gaming
  (12.6 - 115, n=415)
54 fps ∼63% -29%
Far Cry 5 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, i7-10875H
98 fps ∼100%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
 
98 fps ∼100% 0%
Average of class Gaming
  (10 - 113, n=58)
73 fps ∼74% -26%
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, i9-10980HK
91.1 (59min) fps ∼100% +14%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
  (79.7 - 91.1, n=2)
85.4 fps ∼94% +7%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H
83.7 fps ∼92% +5%
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, i7-10875H
79.7 fps ∼87%
Average of class Gaming
  (11.8 - 108, n=59)
57.1 fps ∼63% -28%
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 high (2/3)
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, i9-10980HK
133 (116.7min) fps ∼100% +20%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H
127 (110.6min) fps ∼95% +14%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
  (111 - 135, n=3)
126 fps ∼95% +14%
Average of class Gaming
  (15.3 - 167, n=81)
112 fps ∼84% +1%
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, i7-10875H
111 (95.8min) fps ∼83%
X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H
90 fps ∼100% +15%
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, i9-10980HK
87 fps ∼97% +11%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
  (78.5 - 87, n=3)
84 fps ∼93% +7%
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, i7-10875H
78.5 fps ∼87%
Average of class Gaming
  (17.2 - 103, n=87)
70.4 fps ∼78% -10%
051015202530354045505560657075808590Tooltip
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, i7-10875H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00: Ø75.5 (19-81)
lage gem. hoge ultra
The Witcher 3 (2015) 76.3 fps
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 156 136 111 104 fps
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 79.7 fps
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 107 89.4 78.5 fps
Far Cry 5 (2018) 98 fps
Doom Eternal (2020) 190.4 fps

Geluidsniveau

Onbelast
28 / 31 / 36 dB (A)
Belasting
56 / 57 dB (A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
stil
40 dB(A)
hoorbaar
50 dB(A)
luid
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm afstand)   environment noise: 25 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2041.140.638.337.939.62538.537.133.738.337.9314751.640.145.4454031.934.925.829.433.5503031.728.541.9316328.52623.127.630.18027.322.617.816.629.710035.819.51816.535.712530.520.518.516.331.116030.920.619.218.431.120031.722.923.122.632.825032.821.821.516.934.631535.622.619.813.537.940035.922.117.811.937.550037.923.818.311.439.263039.824.319.310.841.180040.323.219.410.441.2100043.125.62211.143.4125044.526.32111.24516004626.621.611.647.220004726.721.611.347.7250046.124.61912.147.5315044.722.517.312.545.1400044.321.115.912.644.7500044.420.115.113.344.7630041.817.614.213.441.6800039.314.313.313.339.11000038.613.614.212.837.11250034.413.113.912.533.81600028.712.513.811.827.5SPL55.935.731.124.956.6N10.32.21.40.610.8median 39.3median 22.1median 18.5median 12.5median 39.2Delta5.32.82.91.45.2hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseAsus Zephyrus S15 GX502L
Max. Belasting
 49 °C51 °C50 °C 
 47 °C50 °C46 °C 
 34 °C36 °C37 °C 
Maximum: 51 °C
Gemiddelde: 44.4 °C
44 °C44 °C42 °C
44 °C44 °C43 °C
41 °C35 °C32 °C
Maximum: 44 °C
Gemiddelde: 41 °C
Stroomadapter (max.)  53 °C | Kamertemperatuur 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 44.4 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 33.4 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 51 °C / 124 F, compared to the average of 39.9 °C / 104 F, ranging from 21.6 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 42.7 °C / 109 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.3 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 33.4 °C / 92 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 44.1 °C / 111 F, compared to the device average of 33.4 °C / 92 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 37 °C / 98.6 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-8.2 °C / -14.8 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2037.944.62538.341.23145.453.24029.435.85041.9356327.634.78016.63710016.544.812516.352.616018.456.820022.657.925016.962.531513.561.740011.961.250011.46863010.870.280010.470.8100011.171.3125011.269.7160011.670.9200011.372.4250012.167.8315012.568.1400012.673.8500013.372.2630013.468.1800013.367.71000012.874.51250012.574.21600011.870.3SPL24.982.9N0.658.3median 12.5median 68.1Delta1.44.843.644.939.640.430.933.83542.828.335.92635.828.642.128.757.423.854.622.957.423.958.52560.92064.219.16417.965.117.372.516.97517.177.818.576.717.874.917.474.117.467.717.676.817.583.317.484.217.279.817.271.617.266.51769.216.863.43090.21.481.4median 17.5median 69.21.86hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseAsus Zephyrus S15 GX502LAsus Zephyrus S GX502GW
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 4% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.7% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (11.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 28% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 65% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 12% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Stroomgebruik
Uit / Standbydarklight 1.2 / 1.4 Watt
Inactiefdarkmidlight 7 / 13 / 25 Watt
Belasting midlight 148 / 232 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L
i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS
i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
Aorus 15G XB
i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
Average of class Gaming
 
Power Consumption
-61%
0%
-31%
-29%
-44%
Idle Minimum *
7
24
-243%
6
14%
14.3
-104%
16
-129%
18.8 (1.9 - 113, n=793)
-169%
Idle Average *
13
27
-108%
14
-8%
22.3
-72%
20
-54%
24.2 (6 - 119, n=793)
-86%
Idle Maximum *
25
33
-32%
25
-0%
36.9
-48%
30
-20%
29.8 (8.3 - 122, n=793)
-19%
Load Average *
148
129
13%
108
27%
118.4
20%
102
31%
104 (14.1 - 319, n=785)
30%
Witcher 3 ultra *
175
176
-1%
195
-11%
153.7
12%
156
11%
Load Maximum *
232
216
7%
280
-21%
220.8
5%
256
-10%
177 (21.9 - 590, n=784)
24%

* ... kleiner is beter

Batterijduur
Inactief (zonder WLAN, minimale helderheid)
8h 40min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
3h 01min
Belast (maximale helderheid)
1h 30min
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L
i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, 76 Wh
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, 76 Wh
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS
i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, 99.99 Wh
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, 80 Wh
Aorus 15G XB
i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, 94 Wh
Average of class Gaming
 
Batterijduur
-14%
35%
110%
68%
2%
Reader / Idle
520
353
-32%
454
-13%
579
11%
364 (39 - 1399, n=736)
-30%
WiFi v1.3
181
220
22%
364
101%
380
110%
418
131%
268 (62 - 683, n=455)
48%
Load
90
62
-31%
106
18%
147
63%
79.8 (18 - 243, n=704)
-11%

Pro

+ goede gaming-prestaties
+ uitstekende luidsprekers
+ slanke behuizing

Contra

- ventilatoren kunnen erg luid worden
- geen geheugenkaartlezer

Conclusie - Kortere batterijduur met een "Super" GPU

Getest: Asus ROG Zephyrus S15 GX502L. Testtoestel voorzien door: Asus Germany
Getest: Asus ROG Zephyrus S15 GX502L. Testtoestel voorzien door: Asus Germany

Dit is de verkorte versie van het originele artikel. Het volledige, Engelse testrapport vind je hier.

De Asus ROG Zephyrus S15 GX502L is zonder twijfel een krachtige gaming-laptop. Het slanke ontwerp maakt het ook een vrij mobiel toestel als je bereid bent om regelmatig op zoek te gaan naar een stopcontact voor de kleinste van de twee voedingsadapters. In gaming-modus zorgt het ventilatiesysteem voor goede frame-rates, ook zonder dat de ventilatoren meteen volle kracht moeten geven.

Met de Asus ROG Zephyrus S15 kunnen moderne games zonder problemen met maximale details worden gespeeld.

Maar dit roept bij potentiële kopers de vraag op waarom ze voor dit model zouden moeten kiezen. Het vorige model is verkrijgbaar voor een vergelijkbare prijs, biedt vergelijkbare gaming-prestaties en gaat wat langer mee in batterijmodus. De prestaties liggen niet veel hoger, ondanks de modernere CPU en de integratie van de RTX 2070 Super in plaats van "slechts" de RTX 2070. Als je maximale prestaties echter belangrijker vindt dan batterijduur, zal je zeer tevreden zijn met de Zephyrus S15.

Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L - 27-09-2020 v7
Mike Wobker

Behuizing
81 / 98 → 82%
Toetsenbord
79%
Aanwijsapparaat
75%
Aansluitmogelijkheden
65 / 80 → 81%
Gewicht
62 / 10-66 → 94%
Batterij
52 / 95 → 55%
Beeldscherm
86%
Gaming-performance
95%
Applicatie-performance
92%
Temperatuur
82 / 95 → 86%
Luidheid
57 / 90 → 63%
Audio
90%
Gemiddelde
70%
83%
Gaming - Gewogen Gemiddelde

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Overzichten en testrapporten over laptops en mobieltjes > Testrapporten > Kort testrapport Asus ROG Zephyrus S15 GX502L laptop: Gaming-laptop geüpdatet naar Comet Lake
Mike Wobker, 2020-09-30 (Update: 2020-10- 1)