Notebookcheck

Kort testrapport Acer Swift 5 SF515-51T (i7-8565U, SSD, FHD) Laptop

Sascha Mölck, 👁 Sebastian Jentsch, 14-02-2019

999 gram. Acer heeft een 15.6-inch notebook ontwikkeld die zo licht is als een veertje en beschikt over de nieuwste technologie: een Whisky Lake-processor, een NVMe SSD en (dual-channel) DDR4 RAM. Natuurlijk zijn deze functies niet goedkoop: het apparaat is beschikbaar voor ongeveer $1400.

Acer Swift 5 SF515-51T-76B6 (Swift 5 Serie)
Processor
Intel Core i7-8565U
Grafische kaart
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Core: 300-1150 MHz, Dual-Channel, 25.20.100.6373
Geheugen
16384 MB 
, DDR4-2400, Dual-Channel, RAM gesoldeerd, geen vrije slots
Beeldscherm
15.6 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, 10-punts capacitief, LG Philips LP156WFA-SPG2, IPS, glimmend: ja
Moederbord
Intel Cannon Lake-U PCH-LP Premium
Opslag
SK Hynix BC501 HFM512GDJTNG, 512 GB 
, SSD gesoldeerd; vrije M.2 2280 slot (één voor NVMe SSD's), 440 GB beschikbaar
Verbindingen
3 USB 3.0, 0 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Verbindingen: gecombineerde audiopoort, 1 Vingerafdruklezer, TPM 2.0
Netwerkmogelijkheden
Intel Wireless-AC 9560 (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 5
Afmetingen
hoogte x breedte x diepte (in mm): 15.9 x 358 x 230
Batterij
53.9 Wh, 4670 mAh Lithium-Ion, 11.55 V
Besturingssysteem
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: HD
Primary Camera: 0.9 MPix
Bijkomende functionaliteiten
Luidsprekers: stereo, Toetsenbord: chiclet, Toetsenbordverlichting: ja, Mozilla Firefox, Norton Security (testversie), 24 Maanden Garantie
Gewicht
999 g, Voeding: 155 g
Prijs
1499 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Size Comparison

358 mm 228 mm 17 mm 1.1 kg358 mm 230 mm 15.9 mm 999 g323 mm 217 mm 15 mm 1.1 kg319 mm 199 mm 15.9 mm 1.2 kg
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Acer Swift 5 SF515-51T-76B6
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
647 (min: 493, max: 679) MBit/s ∼100%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX433FA
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
641 MBit/s ∼99% -1%
LG Gram 15Z980-B.AA78B
Intel 8265 Tri-Band WiFi (Oak Peak) Network Adapter
606 MBit/s ∼94% -6%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G6-20KG0025UK
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
540 MBit/s ∼83% -17%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (71 - 950, n=99)
533 MBit/s ∼82% -18%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Acer Swift 5 SF515-51T-76B6
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
638 (min: 582, max: 695) MBit/s ∼100%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX433FA
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
563 MBit/s ∼88% -12%
LG Gram 15Z980-B.AA78B
Intel 8265 Tri-Band WiFi (Oak Peak) Network Adapter
540 MBit/s ∼85% -15%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (72 - 949, n=99)
522 MBit/s ∼82% -18%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G6-20KG0025UK
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
494 MBit/s ∼77% -23%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700Tooltip
Acer Swift 5 SF515-51T-76B6 Intel Wireless-AC 9560; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø646 (493-679)
Acer Swift 5 SF515-51T-76B6 Intel Wireless-AC 9560; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø638 (582-695)
Invoerapparaten
Invoerapparaten
307
cd/m²
310
cd/m²
327
cd/m²
299
cd/m²
341
cd/m²
323
cd/m²
300
cd/m²
321
cd/m²
345
cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 345 cd/m² Gemiddelde: 319.2 cd/m² Minimum: 20.8 cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling: 87 %
Helderheid in Batterij-modus: 336 cd/m²
Contrast: 1100:1 (Zwart: 0.31 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.01 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.2, calibrated: 1.11
ΔE Greyscale 2.01 | 0.64-98 Ø6.4
98% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 63% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.52
Acer Swift 5 SF515-51T-76B6
IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G6-20KG0025UK
IPS, 1920x1080, 14
Asus ZenBook 14 UX433FA
IPS, 1920x1080, 14
LG Gram 15Z980-B.AA78B
IPS LED, 1920x1080, 15.6
Response Times
-3%
0%
8%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
38 (19, 19)
40 (18, 22)
-5%
39.6 (21.2, 18.4)
-4%
34.3 (16.4, 17.9)
10%
Response Time Black / White *
25 (14, 11)
25 (14, 11)
-0%
24 (14.4, 9.6)
4%
23.7 (13.1, 10.6)
5%
PWM Frequency
Screen
-0%
-80%
-18%
Brightness middle
341
298
-13%
332.8
-2%
349
2%
Brightness
319
287
-10%
310
-3%
331
4%
Brightness Distribution
87
91
5%
87
0%
84
-3%
Black Level *
0.31
0.2
35%
0.29
6%
0.32
-3%
Contrast
1100
1490
35%
1148
4%
1091
-1%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
2.01
2.19
-9%
5.14
-156%
3.1
-54%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
4.74
4.39
7%
11.88
-151%
6.6
-39%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
1.11
1.67
-50%
3.61
-225%
1.5
-35%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
2.01
1.97
2%
8.8
-338%
3.3
-64%
Gamma
2.52 87%
2.43 91%
2.33 94%
2.16 102%
CCT
6704 97%
6571 99%
8227 79%
6973 93%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
63
62
-2%
58.1
-8%
61.46
-2%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
98
95
-3%
89.2
-9%
96.05
-2%
Totaal Gemiddelde (Programma / Instellingen)
-2% / -1%
-40% / -68%
-5% / -14%

* ... kleiner is beter

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Om de schermhelderheid te verlagen schakelen sommige laptops het backlight erg snel aan en uit. Dit gebeurt aan een dergelijk hoge frequentie dat het niet zichtbaar is voor het menselijk oog. Als de frequentie te laag is kunnen personen met gevoelige ogen geïrriteerd geraken, hoofdpijn krijgen en zelfs flickering waarnemen.
Screen flickering / PWM niet waargenomen

Ter vergelijking: 52 % van alle geteste toestellen maakten geen gebruik van PWM om de schermhelderheid te verlagen. Als het wel werd gebruikt, werd een gemiddelde van 9824 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz waargenomen.

CalMAN - ColorChecker
CalMAN - ColorChecker
CalMAN - Grayscales
CalMAN - Grayscales
CalMAN - Saturation Sweeps
CalMAN - Saturation Sweeps
CalMAN - ColorChecker (na kalibratie)
CalMAN - ColorChecker (na kalibratie)
CalMAN - Grayscales (na kalibratie)
CalMAN - Grayscales (na kalibratie)
CalMAN - Saturation Sweeps (na kalibratie)
CalMAN - Saturation Sweeps (na kalibratie)

Responstijd Scherm

De responstijden van het scherm tonen hoe snel het scherm in staat is om van één kleur naar de andere te veranderen. Trage responstijden kunnen aanleiding geven tot 'nabeelden' rond bewegende objecten of het scherm wazig maken (blur). Vooral spelers van snelle 3D-games hebben baat bij een scherm met snelle responstijden.
       Responstijd Zwart naar Wit
25 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd↗ 14 ms stijging
↘ 11 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde relatief trage responstijden in onze tests en is misschien te traag voor games.
Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.8 (minimum) tot 240 (maximum) ms. » 40 % van alle toestellen zijn beter.
Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd vergelijkbaar is met het gemiddelde (25.5 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.
       Responstijd 50% Grijs naar 80% Grijs
38 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd↗ 19 ms stijging
↘ 19 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde trage responstijden in onze tests en is misschien te traag voor games.
Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.9 (minimum) tot 636 (maximum) ms. » 35 % van alle toestellen zijn beter.
Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd vergelijkbaar is met het gemiddelde (40.8 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630Tooltip
Acer Swift 5 SF515-51T-76B6 Intel Core i7-8565U, Intel Core i7-8565U: Ø441 (424.51-542.46)
Asus ZenBook 14 UX433FA Intel Core i7-8565U, Intel Core i7-8565U: Ø591 (579.19-624.27)
LG Gram 15Z980-B.AA78B Intel Core i7-8550U, Intel Core i7-8550U: Ø475 (461.37-506.44)
CPU kloksnelheid tijdens CB15 lus
CPU kloksnelheid tijdens CB15 lus
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
16331
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
8621
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
6466
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
5.96 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
1.87 Points
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
39.8 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
97.8 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
55.07 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
543 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
173 Points
Help
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Acer Swift 5 SF515-51T-76B6
Intel Core i7-8565U
173 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i7-8565U
  (138 - 191, n=17)
173 Points ∼100% 0%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX433FA
Intel Core i7-8565U
169 Points ∼98% -2%
LG Gram 15Z980-B.AA78B
Intel Core i7-8550U
158 Points ∼91% -9%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G6-20KG0025UK
Intel Core i5-8350U
150 Points ∼87% -13%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (20 - 184, n=250)
113 Points ∼65% -35%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G6-20KG0025UK
Intel Core i5-8350U
631 Points ∼100% +16%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX433FA
Intel Core i7-8565U
622 Points ∼99% +15%
Average Intel Core i7-8565U
  (543 - 815, n=18)
619 Points ∼98% +14%
Acer Swift 5 SF515-51T-76B6
Intel Core i7-8565U
543 Points ∼86%
LG Gram 15Z980-B.AA78B
Intel Core i7-8550U
501 Points ∼79% -8%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (32 - 721, n=260)
324 Points ∼51% -40%
Cinebench R10
Rendering Single 32Bit
Asus ZenBook 14 UX433FA
Intel Core i7-8565U
6760 Points ∼100% +5%
Average Intel Core i7-8565U
  (2682 - 8906, n=9)
6564 Points ∼97% +2%
Acer Swift 5 SF515-51T-76B6
Intel Core i7-8565U
6466 Points ∼96%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (322 - 6760, n=454)
3117 Points ∼46% -52%
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
Asus ZenBook 14 UX433FA
Intel Core i7-8565U
19689 Points ∼100% +21%
Average Intel Core i7-8565U
  (14912 - 23118, n=9)
18726 Points ∼95% +15%
Acer Swift 5 SF515-51T-76B6
Intel Core i7-8565U
16331 Points ∼83%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (661 - 20773, n=436)
6939 Points ∼35% -58%
Geekbench 3
32 Bit Multi-Core Score
Average Intel Core i7-8565U
  (10521 - 13703, n=6)
12182 Points ∼100% +10%
Acer Swift 5 SF515-51T-76B6
Intel Core i7-8565U
11122 Points ∼91%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (1018 - 13703, n=70)
5840 Points ∼48% -47%
32 Bit Single-Core Score
Average Intel Core i7-8565U
  (3568 - 4820, n=6)
4144 Points ∼100% +5%
Acer Swift 5 SF515-51T-76B6
Intel Core i7-8565U
3965 Points ∼96%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (592 - 4051, n=70)
2529 Points ∼61% -36%
Geekbench 4.0
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Average Intel Core i7-8565U
  (11576 - 14655, n=3)
13499 Points ∼100% +17%
Acer Swift 5 SF515-51T-76B6
Intel Core i7-8565U
11576 Points ∼86%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (2529 - 14655, n=28)
7653 Points ∼57% -34%
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Acer Swift 5 SF515-51T-76B6
Intel Core i7-8565U
4791 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i7-8565U
  (4701 - 4791, n=2)
4746 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (1179 - 4791, n=28)
3419 Points ∼71% -29%
Geekbench 4.3
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Average Intel Core i7-8565U
  (12218 - 15584, n=11)
13923 Points ∼100% +14%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX433FA
Intel Core i7-8565U
12832 Points ∼92% +5%
Acer Swift 5 SF515-51T-76B6
Intel Core i7-8565U
12218 Points ∼88%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (2593 - 15584, n=20)
9788 Points ∼70% -20%
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Asus ZenBook 14 UX433FA
Intel Core i7-8565U
5210 Points ∼100% +6%
Average Intel Core i7-8565U
  (4708 - 5518, n=11)
5121 Points ∼98% +4%
Acer Swift 5 SF515-51T-76B6
Intel Core i7-8565U
4915 Points ∼94%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (1529 - 5280, n=20)
3823 Points ∼73% -22%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Subnotebook
  (797 - 30250, n=137)
2072 ms * ∼100% -94%
Average Intel Core i7-8565U
  (752 - 2622, n=15)
1137 ms * ∼55% -6%
Acer Swift 5 SF515-51T-76B6
Intel Core i7-8565U (Edge 44)
1068 ms * ∼52%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX433FA
Intel Core i7-8565U (Edge 42.17134.1.0)
1025.7 ms * ∼50% +4%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average Intel Core i7-8565U
  (13935 - 49795, n=15)
35749 Points ∼100% +3%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX433FA
Intel Core i7-8565U (Edge 42.17134.1.0)
35538 Points ∼99% +2%
Acer Swift 5 SF515-51T-76B6
Intel Core i7-8565U (Edge 44)
34708 Points ∼97%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (3963 - 41665, n=129)
24638 Points ∼69% -29%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Acer Swift 5 SF515-51T-76B6
Intel Core i7-8565U (Edge 44)
244.82 Points ∼100%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX433FA
Intel Core i7-8565U (Edge 42.17134.1.0)
241.02 Points ∼98% -2%
Average Intel Core i7-8565U
  (108 - 277, n=16)
234 Points ∼96% -4%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (34.8 - 277, n=119)
187 Points ∼76% -24%

* ... kleiner is beter

PCMark 7 Score
6240 punten
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
4093 punten
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
5013 punten
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
5181 punten
Help
PCMark 10
Digital Content Creation
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G6-20KG0025UK
UHD Graphics 620, 8350U, Lenovo LENSE20256GMSP34MEAT2TA
3024 Points ∼100% +4%
Average Intel Core i7-8565U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (2264 - 3370, n=10)
2946 Points ∼97% +1%
Acer Swift 5 SF515-51T-76B6
UHD Graphics 620, 8565U, SK Hynix BC501 HFM512GDJTNG
2915 Points ∼96%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX433FA
UHD Graphics 620, 8565U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
2781 Points ∼92% -5%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (678 - 3704, n=65)
2341 Points ∼77% -20%
LG Gram 15Z980-B.AA78B
UHD Graphics 620, 8550U, SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39TNF)
1506 Points ∼50% -48%
Productivity
Acer Swift 5 SF515-51T-76B6
UHD Graphics 620, 8565U, SK Hynix BC501 HFM512GDJTNG
7050 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i7-8565U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (3381 - 7588, n=10)
6521 Points ∼92% -8%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX433FA
UHD Graphics 620, 8565U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
6400 Points ∼91% -9%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G6-20KG0025UK
UHD Graphics 620, 8350U, Lenovo LENSE20256GMSP34MEAT2TA
6140 Points ∼87% -13%
LG Gram 15Z980-B.AA78B
UHD Graphics 620, 8550U, SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39TNF)
5553 Points ∼79% -21%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (1690 - 7281, n=65)
5122 Points ∼73% -27%
Essentials
Acer Swift 5 SF515-51T-76B6
UHD Graphics 620, 8565U, SK Hynix BC501 HFM512GDJTNG
8493 Points ∼100%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX433FA
UHD Graphics 620, 8565U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
7952 Points ∼94% -6%
Average Intel Core i7-8565U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (5450 - 8787, n=10)
7940 Points ∼93% -7%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G6-20KG0025UK
UHD Graphics 620, 8350U, Lenovo LENSE20256GMSP34MEAT2TA
7799 Points ∼92% -8%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (3073 - 8549, n=65)
6679 Points ∼79% -21%
LG Gram 15Z980-B.AA78B
UHD Graphics 620, 8550U, SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39TNF)
6628 Points ∼78% -22%
Score
Acer Swift 5 SF515-51T-76B6
UHD Graphics 620, 8565U, SK Hynix BC501 HFM512GDJTNG
4006 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i7-8565U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (2486 - 4172, n=10)
3824 Points ∼95% -5%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G6-20KG0025UK
UHD Graphics 620, 8350U, Lenovo LENSE20256GMSP34MEAT2TA
3764 Points ∼94% -6%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX433FA
UHD Graphics 620, 8565U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
3736 Points ∼93% -7%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (1102 - 4344, n=68)
3051 Points ∼76% -24%
LG Gram 15Z980-B.AA78B
UHD Graphics 620, 8550U, SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39TNF)
2733 Points ∼68% -32%
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Acer Swift 5 SF515-51T-76B6
UHD Graphics 620, 8565U, SK Hynix BC501 HFM512GDJTNG
5181 Points ∼100%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX433FA
UHD Graphics 620, 8565U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
4851 Points ∼94% -6%
Average Intel Core i7-8565U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (3596 - 5181, n=8)
4744 Points ∼92% -8%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G6-20KG0025UK
UHD Graphics 620, 8350U, Lenovo LENSE20256GMSP34MEAT2TA
4600 Points ∼89% -11%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (1283 - 5363, n=193)
3990 Points ∼77% -23%
LG Gram 15Z980-B.AA78B
UHD Graphics 620, 8550U, SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39TNF)
3518 Points ∼68% -32%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Acer Swift 5 SF515-51T-76B6
UHD Graphics 620, 8565U, SK Hynix BC501 HFM512GDJTNG
4093 Points ∼100%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G6-20KG0025UK
UHD Graphics 620, 8350U, Lenovo LENSE20256GMSP34MEAT2TA
3690 Points ∼90% -10%
Average Intel Core i7-8565U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (2577 - 4179, n=9)
3572 Points ∼87% -13%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX433FA
UHD Graphics 620, 8565U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
3285 Points ∼80% -20%
LG Gram 15Z980-B.AA78B
UHD Graphics 620, 8550U, SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39TNF)
3255 Points ∼80% -20%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (1027 - 4182, n=219)
3020 Points ∼74% -26%
SK Hynix BC501 HFM512GDJTNG
Sequential Read: 1089 MB/s
Sequential Write: 762.7 MB/s
512K Read: 875 MB/s
512K Write: 677.9 MB/s
4K Read: 48.68 MB/s
4K Write: 149.1 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 571 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 490.1 MB/s
Acer Swift 5 SF515-51T-76B6
SK Hynix BC501 HFM512GDJTNG
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G6-20KG0025UK
Lenovo LENSE20256GMSP34MEAT2TA
LG Gram 15Z980-B.AA78B
SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39TNF)
Average SK Hynix BC501 HFM512GDJTNG
 
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
-20%
-51%
-16%
Write 4k QD32
490.1
184.7
-62%
224.2
-54%
374 (289 - 490, n=3)
-24%
Read 4k QD32
571
306.1
-46%
251.5
-56%
400 (232 - 571, n=3)
-30%
Write 4k
149.1
94.09
-37%
71.1
-52%
122 (99.2 - 149, n=3)
-18%
Read 4k
48.68
34.87
-28%
23.6
-52%
44.7 (40.8 - 48.7, n=3)
-8%
Write 512
677.9
243.3
-64%
413.8
-39%
562 (411 - 678, n=3)
-17%
Read 512
875
1227
40%
367
-58%
748 (603 - 875, n=3)
-15%
Write Seq
762.7
479
-37%
446.7
-41%
716 (650 - 763, n=3)
-6%
Read Seq
1089
1880
73%
488.2
-55%
950 (756 - 1089, n=3)
-13%
3DMark 06 Standard
12132 punten
3DMark 11 Performance
2087 punten
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
9036 punten
3DMark Fire Strike Score
1199 punten
Help
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Asus ZenBook 14 UX433FA
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-8565U
1979 Points ∼100% +6%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G6-20KG0025UK
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8350U
1868 Points ∼94% 0%
Acer Swift 5 SF515-51T-76B6
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-8565U
1866 Points ∼94%
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (1235 - 1979, n=132)
1696 Points ∼86% -9%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (230 - 4905, n=338)
1212 Points ∼61% -35%
3DMark
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Subnotebook
  (85 - 905, n=26)
434 Points ∼100%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX433FA
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-8565U
402 Points ∼93%
LG Gram 15Z980-B.AA78B
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-8550U
372 Points ∼86%
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (299 - 402, n=21)
347 Points ∼80%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Acer Swift 5 SF515-51T-76B6
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-8565U
1323 Points ∼100%
LG Gram 15Z980-B.AA78B
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-8550U
1284 Points ∼97% -3%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G6-20KG0025UK
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8350U
1283 Points ∼97% -3%
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (557 - 1399, n=103)
1104 Points ∼83% -17%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (222 - 3726, n=220)
983 Points ∼74% -26%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Asus ZenBook 14 UX433FA
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-8565U
11294 Points ∼100% +5%
Acer Swift 5 SF515-51T-76B6
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-8565U
10795 Points ∼96%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G6-20KG0025UK
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8350U
10234 Points ∼91% -5%
LG Gram 15Z980-B.AA78B
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-8550U
10131 Points ∼90% -6%
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (6910 - 11294, n=118)
9024 Points ∼80% -16%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (1484 - 21755, n=248)
7224 Points ∼64% -33%
lage gem. hoge ultra
Tomb Raider (2013) 103.751.834.415.2fps
BioShock Infinite (2013) 76.539.933.59.4fps
The Witcher 3 (2015) 16.910.96.13.1fps

Geluidsniveau

Onbelast
30.5 / 30.5 / 30.9 dB (A)
Belasting
34.9 / 35 dB (A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
stil
40 dB(A)
hoorbaar
50 dB(A)
luid
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm afstand)   environment noise: 30.5 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2030.730.930.632.830.72531.132.630.129.431.1313130.631.930.6314031.730.129.63031.75029.929.427.728.829.96328.12828.526.128.1802625.62727.62610026.426.526.125.626.412525.624.625.324.825.616024.323.623.723.924.320023.32322.622.423.325022.922.722.321.722.931521.621.921.321.221.640021.321.420.720.221.350020.620.719.819.420.663020.119.919.318.920.18002221.818.517.722100023.723.818.217.723.7125023.724.118.117.723.7160023.823.618.117.623.8200025.325.318.317.725.3250024.424.918.217.524.4315024.324.518.418.124.3400021.421.718.418.221.4500022.62318.718.322.6630019.919.91918.619.9800019.419.419.118.919.41000019.319.119.21919.31250019.519.219.31919.51600020.520.619.519.420.5SPL34.935.130.930.534.9N221.31.32median 22.6median 22.7median 19.2median 18.9median 22.6Delta1.81.81.61.81.842.54238.441.737.430.929.932.330.632.430.829.629.829.528.831.331.330.32929.729.630.22928.130.128.829.928.727.528.327.530.62825.727.225.828.52625.226.624.226.52524.324.923.924.224.922.724.323.323.824.22223.422.326.425.321.422.321.82423.720.82120.824.123.420.22020.323.322.419.119.819.621.921.118.51919.222.5221818.819.422.321.917.618.519.823.222.817.318.319.82524.517.418.42025.625.117.117.719.125.725.91717.31824.424.51717.417.320.520.516.917.417.21918.91717.217.31817.817.217.417.417.717.517.217.417.417.517.417.217.517.217.617.217.117.317.317.417.217.217.431.135.134.829.730.31.52.22.11.31.4median 19.6median 23.3median 22.8median 17.4median 18.42.32.52.91.82.6hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseAcer Swift 5 SF515-51T-76B6LG Gram 15Z980-B.AA78B
Acer Swift 5 SF515-51T-76B6
8565U, UHD Graphics 620
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G6-20KG0025UK
8350U, UHD Graphics 620
Asus ZenBook 14 UX433FA
8565U, UHD Graphics 620
LG Gram 15Z980-B.AA78B
8550U, UHD Graphics 620
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620
 
Average of class Subnotebook
 
Noise
4%
1%
1%
2%
-1%
off / environment *
30.5
30.25
1%
28.8
6%
29.7
3%
29.5 (27.8 - 30.6, n=134)
3%
29.9 (27.6 - 31.6, n=118)
2%
Idle Minimum *
30.5
30.25
1%
28.8
6%
30.3
1%
29.6 (27.8 - 32, n=135)
3%
29.6 (27.9 - 37.6, n=585)
3%
Idle Average *
30.5
30.25
1%
28.8
6%
30.3
1%
29.6 (27.8 - 33.8, n=135)
3%
30.4 (27.9 - 48.5, n=585)
-0%
Idle Maximum *
30.9
30.25
2%
29.1
6%
31.1
-1%
30.1 (27.8 - 34.2, n=135)
3%
30.9 (27.9 - 44.2, n=585)
-0%
Load Average *
34.9
31.3
10%
36.1
-3%
34.9
-0%
33.8 (28.5 - 44.8, n=132)
3%
34.1 (28.6 - 49.7, n=583)
2%
Load Maximum *
35
31.3
11%
41.2
-18%
34.9
-0%
36.1 (30.6 - 46.8, n=135)
-3%
39 (30.2 - 53.8, n=585)
-11%

* ... kleiner is beter

Max. Belasting
 44.4 °C43.3 °C41.4 °C 
 39.2 °C38.4 °C28 °C 
 29 °C38.9 °C27.1 °C 
Maximum: 44.4 °C
Gemiddelde: 36.6 °C
29.8 °C45.7 °C38.1 °C
27.1 °C32.2 °C34.4 °C
27.2 °C28.9 °C29.6 °C
Maximum: 45.7 °C
Gemiddelde: 32.6 °C
Stroomadapter (max.)  55.8 °C | Kamertemperatuur 23.2 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 36.6 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 30.7 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Subnotebook.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.4 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 35.8 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22 to 57 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45.7 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 40.2 °C / 104 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.1 °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of 30.7 °C / 87 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 38.9 °C / 102 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.6 °C / 83.5 F (-10.3 °C / -18.5 F).
Acer Swift 5 SF515-51T-76B6
8565U, UHD Graphics 620
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G6-20KG0025UK
8350U, UHD Graphics 620
Asus ZenBook 14 UX433FA
8565U, UHD Graphics 620
LG Gram 15Z980-B.AA78B
8550U, UHD Graphics 620
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620
 
Average of class Subnotebook
 
Heat
0%
-9%
-1%
-1%
-11%
Maximum Upper Side *
44.4
40.7
8%
42.4
5%
43
3%
41.1 (29 - 52.6, n=135)
7%
41 (28.4 - 57, n=590)
8%
Maximum Bottom *
45.7
41.6
9%
45
2%
41
10%
44.3 (31.8 - 57.8, n=135)
3%
43.5 (24.3 - 66.2, n=590)
5%
Idle Upper Side *
25.4
28
-10%
31
-22%
28
-10%
27 (21.4 - 38, n=134)
-6%
29.7 (22 - 42, n=513)
-17%
Idle Bottom *
25.8
27.4
-6%
30.8
-19%
27
-5%
27.9 (21.8 - 40.4, n=134)
-8%
36.3 (21.6 - 2625, n=513)
-41%

* ... kleiner is beter

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2033.332.833.32529.829.429.83131.330.631.34028.93028.95030.228.830.26328.926.128.9802927.62910032.225.632.21253624.83616037.523.937.520032.822.432.825041.421.741.431547.521.247.540053.120.253.150050.119.450.163051.918.951.980057.817.757.8100059.117.759.1125061.717.761.7160062.117.662.1200062.417.762.4250057.217.557.2315054.918.154.9400056.218.256.2500052.918.352.9630053.718.653.7800052.418.952.41000052.31952.31250052.31952.31600047.719.447.7SPL70.130.570.1N23.31.323.3median 52.4median 18.9median 52.4Delta5.21.85.243.840.33230.830.43030.730.429.829.228.228.625.92824.627.127.824.839.62448.323.253.222.358.721.364.221.167.720.472.119.77519.473.118.972.918.474.318.469.317.76617.465.817.563.217.366.417.366.117.467.117.568.717.468.117.362.717.482.230.5531.4median 66.1median 18.46.72.5hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseAcer Swift 5 SF515-51T-76B6LG Gram 15Z980-B.AA78B
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Acer Swift 5 SF515-51T-76B6 audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (62.41 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 57% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 8%, average was 20%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 38% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 55% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

LG Gram 15Z980-B.AA78B audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 50% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 43% worse
» The best had a delta of 8%, average was 20%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 32% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 62% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Stroomgebruik
Uit / Standbydarklight 0.25 / 0.25 Watt
Inactiefdarkmidlight 3 / 7.7 / 11.6 Watt
Belasting midlight 34 / 35 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Acer Swift 5 SF515-51T-76B6
8565U, UHD Graphics 620
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G6-20KG0025UK
8350U, UHD Graphics 620
Asus ZenBook 14 UX433FA
8565U, UHD Graphics 620
LG Gram 15Z980-B.AA78B
8550U, UHD Graphics 620
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620
 
Average of class Subnotebook
 
Power Consumption
1%
-6%
-13%
-6%
-35%
Idle Minimum *
3
4.7
-57%
3.9
-30%
3.7
-23%
3.95 (1.3 - 12.4, n=139)
-32%
6.75 (1 - 36, n=575)
-125%
Idle Average *
7.7
7.3
5%
5.9
23%
8.5
-10%
7.21 (4.3 - 15.5, n=139)
6%
9.96 (2.06 - 39, n=575)
-29%
Idle Maximum *
11.6
9.4
19%
8.8
24%
10
14%
9.09 (5.2 - 16.6, n=139)
22%
12.3 (3.9 - 55, n=575)
-6%
Load Average *
34
28
18%
41.7
-23%
36
-6%
35.2 (12.9 - 51.6, n=139)
-4%
33.4 (6.3 - 75, n=565)
2%
Load Maximum *
35
28.2
19%
44
-26%
48.7
-39%
42.7 (22 - 79, n=139)
-22%
40.4 (7.6 - 111, n=568)
-15%

* ... kleiner is beter

Batterijduur
Inactief (zonder WLAN, minimale helderheid)
16h 10min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3 (Edge 44)
7h 10min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
7h 14min
Belast (maximale helderheid)
2h 25min
Acer Swift 5 SF515-51T-76B6
8565U, UHD Graphics 620, 53.9 Wh
LG Gram 15Z980-B.AA78B
8550U, UHD Graphics 620, 72 Wh
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G6-20KG0025UK
8350U, UHD Graphics 620, 57 Wh
Asus ZenBook 14 UX433FA
8565U, UHD Graphics 620, 50 Wh
Average of class Subnotebook
 
Batterijduur
103%
31%
33%
-10%
Reader / Idle
970
1468
51%
1146
18%
608 (87 - 2557, n=538)
-37%
H.264
434
950
119%
657
51%
461 (182 - 950, n=106)
6%
WiFi v1.3
430
805
87%
621
44%
630
47%
468 (206 - 805, n=192)
9%
Load
145
111
-23%
196
35%
122 (40 - 347, n=543)
-16%

Pro

+ IPS-beeldscherm
+ Full HD-resolutie
+ goede kleurweergave
+ behuizing gemaakt van magnesium
+ laag gewicht
+ goede batterijduur
+ NVMe SSD
+ toetsenbord achtergrondverlichting
+ vrije M.2 2280 slot

Contra

- weerspiegelend beeldscherm
- RAM kan niet uitgebreid worden
- SSD is gesoldeerd
- geen SD kaartlezer
- geen Thunderbolt 3
De Acer Swift 5 SF515-51T-76B6. Testmodel geleverd door Acer Germany.
De Acer Swift 5 SF515-51T-76B6. Testmodel geleverd door Acer Germany.

Voor het volledige, Engelse testrapport, klik hier.

De Swift 5 SF515-51T van Acer is een zeer lichte notebook die is gemaakt voor frequente reizigers die geen afstand willen doen van een groot 15,6-inch beeldscherm.

Met een gewicht van iets minder dan een kilogram is het apparaat nauwelijks merkbaar in je tas - geen overbelaste schouders door deze notebook!

Om dit lage gewicht te bereiken heeft Acer gekozen voor een magnesium behuizing en verschillende compromissen. De RAM-, SSD- en Wi-Fi-modules zijn allemaal op het moederbord gesoldeerd, wat betekent dat geen van deze componenten kan worden uitgewisseld of uitgebreid. Houd daarom rekening met hoeveel opslagruimte je de komende jaren nodig hebt voordat je een Swift 5 koopt. Er is tenminste een gratis M.2 2280-slot, zodat je later NVMe-opslag kunt toevoegen.

Het apparaat wordt aangedreven door een Core i7 Whiskey Lake-processor die voldoende rekenkracht biedt voor kantoor- en internettoepassingen. Helaas kan de Swift 5 niet optimaal gebruikmaken van zijn CPU als hij lange tijd werkt, vooral tijdens multithread-bewerkingen. Als je continue maximale prestaties eist, kan je beter verder kijken.

De Swift 5 biedt een degelijk toetsenbord met achtergrondverlichting op één niveau, plus een relatief lange batterijduur. Het IPS-touchscreen gaf ons ook een goede indruk. Het paneel heeft gebruikelijke contrast- en helderheidswaarden en de kleurenweergave is aangenaam. Houd er echter rekening mee dat dit een reflecterend beeldscherm is. Idealiter zou Acer ook een mat beeldscherm bieden zonder de touchscreen-functie.

De Acer Swift 5 SF515-51T concurreert met de LG Gram 15Z980. De Acer is duidelijk de winnaar wat betreft gewicht, maar de Gram biedt een beduidend langere batterijduur en een beter aanbod van poorten. Deze twee factoren kunnen voor veel potentiële kopers het evenwicht ten gunste van het LG-apparaat teniet doen. Mocht Acer erin slagen om het gewicht in toekomstige versies van de Swift 5 laag te houden en tegelijkertijd batterijduur en poortselectie te verbeteren, dan kan het voor de Gram nog lastig gaan worden.  

Acer Swift 5 SF515-51T-76B6 - 11-02-2019 v6
Sascha Mölck

Behuizing
83 /  98 → 85%
Toetsenbord
79%
Aanwijsapparaat
86%
Aansluitmogelijkheden
54 / 80 → 67%
Gewicht
75 / 35-78 → 93%
Batterij
89%
Beeldscherm
87%
Gaming-performance
59 / 68 → 86%
Applicatie-performance
89 / 87 → 100%
Temperatuur
91 / 91 → 100%
Luidheid
92%
Audio
58 / 91 → 63%
Camera
42 / 85 → 49%
Gemiddelde
76%
87%
Subnotebook - Gewogen Gemiddelde

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Overzichten en testrapporten over laptops en mobieltjes > Testrapporten > Kort testrapport Acer Swift 5 SF515-51T (i7-8565U, SSD, FHD) Laptop
Sascha Mölck, 2019-02-14 (Update: 2019-02-14)