Notebookcheck

Kort testrapport Acer ConceptD 7 Laptop: Eersteklas Intel-CPU met throttling

Christian Hintze, 👁 Sebastian Jentsch, ✓ Stefanie Voigt (vertaald door Siemon Boes), 10-11-2019

Throttling-concept voor in de bibliotheek. Acer adverteert zijn splinternieuwe ConceptD-serie als een hoogwaardig multimedia-systeem voor creatievelingen. Een lange lijst features en een elegant design (evenals een hoge prijs) trachten de aandacht van de koper te trekken. In dit testrapport achterhalen we of de ConceptD hier ook in slaagt.

Acer ConceptD 7 CN715-71-743N (ConceptD 7 Serie)
Processor
Intel Core i7-9750H
Grafische kaart
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop) - 6144 MB, GDDR6, 25.21.14.1972 (Geforce 419.72), Intel UHD Graphics 630
Geheugen
16384 MB 
, 2x 8 GB DDR4-2666
Beeldscherm
15.6 inch 16:9, 3840 x 2160 pixel 282 PPI, AU Optronics AUO31EB, IPS, glimmend: nee
Moederbord
Intel Cannon Lake HM370
Opslag
WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G, 512 GB 
, , 480 GB beschikbaar
Geluidskaart
Intel Cannon Lake-H/S - cAVS (Audio, Voice, Speech)
Verbindingen
3 USB 3.0, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Verbindingen: 3.5mm, 1x USB-C 3.1 met DisplayPort 1.4
Netwerkmogelijkheden
Killer E3000 2.5 Gigabit Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000/2500/5000MBit/s), Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.0
Afmetingen
hoogte x breedte x diepte (in mm): 17.9 x 359 x 255
Batterij
84 Wh, 5550 mAh Lithium-Ion, 4-cellen
Besturingssysteem
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: HD 720p
Primary Camera: 1 MPix
Bijkomende functionaliteiten
Luidsprekers: Stereo, Toetsenbord: Chiclet, Toetsenbordverlichting: ja, 24 Maanden Garantie
Gewicht
2.2 kg, Voeding: 593 g
Prijs
2069 Euro
Links
Acer startpagina
Acer laptopsectie
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

EvaluatieDatumModelGewichtHoogteFormaatResolutieBest Price
86%11-2019Acer ConceptD 7 CN715-71-743N
9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop)		2.2 kg17.9 mm15.6"3840x2160
86%08-2019Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH
9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop)		2.3 kg26 mm15.6"1920x1080
81%10-2019MSI GL65 9SEK
9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop)		2.3 kg27.5 mm15.6"1920x1080
86%08-2019Asus Strix GL531GV-PB74
9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop)		2.4 kg25.9 mm15.6"1920x1080
89%08-2019Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2060
9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop)		2.8 kg19.9 mm17.3"1920x1080
84%09-2019Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti
9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)		2.1 kg19.9 mm15.6"1920x1080

Formaat Vergelijking

395 mm 260 mm 19.9 mm 2.8 kg365 mm 260 mm 26 mm 2.2 kg360 mm 274 mm 25.9 mm 2.4 kg357.7 mm 248 mm 27.5 mm 2.3 kg359 mm 255 mm 17.9 mm 2.2 kg355 mm 235 mm 19.9 mm 2.1 kg

Top 10 Testrapporten

» Top 10 Multimedia Notebooks 
» Top 10 Gaming-Notebooks
» Top 10 Budget Office/Business-Notebooks
» Top 10 Premium Office/Business-Notebooks
» Top 10 Workstation-Laptops
» Top 10 Lichtgewicht Gaming-Notebooks
» Top 10 Subnotebooks
» Top 10 Smartphones tot €120
» Top 10 Smartphones tot €300
» Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Top 10 Convertibles
» Top 10 Tablets
» Top 10 Windows-Tablets
» Top 10 Phablets (>5.5-inch)
» Top 10 Smartphones
» Top 10 Smartphones (≤5-inch)
» Best Geteste Notebook Beeldschermen
» Top 10 Notebooks tot € 1.000De beste notebookbeeldschermen zoals getest door Notebookcheck
» Top 10 Notebooks tot €500
» Top 10 Notebooks tot €300

Links: AC-voeding, LAN, USB type-A 3.0, HDMI, microfoon, koptelefoon
Links: AC-voeding, LAN, USB type-A 3.0, HDMI, microfoon, koptelefoon
Rechts: USB type-C (3.1, Thunderbolt 3), Mini DisplayPort, 2x USB type-A 3.0
Rechts: USB type-C (3.1, Thunderbolt 3), Mini DisplayPort, 2x USB type-A 3.0
Voor: geen poorten
Voor: geen poorten
Achter: uitlaat van de ventilatoren
Achter: uitlaat van de ventilatoren
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH
GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 9750H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
677 MBit/s ∼100% +18%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop), 9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
649 MBit/s ∼96% +13%
MSI GL65 9SEK
GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 9750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
637 MBit/s ∼94% +11%
Acer ConceptD 7 CN715-71-743N
GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 9750H, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G
572 (min: 477, max: 621) MBit/s ∼84%
Average of class Multimedia
  (44 - 1291, n=143)
506 MBit/s ∼75% -12%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH
GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 9750H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
684 MBit/s ∼100% +20%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop), 9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
659 MBit/s ∼96% +15%
Acer ConceptD 7 CN715-71-743N
GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 9750H, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G
571 (min: 351, max: 662) MBit/s ∼83%
Average of class Multimedia
  (46.1 - 1374, n=142)
488 MBit/s ∼71% -15%
MSI GL65 9SEK
GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 9750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
355 MBit/s ∼52% -38%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø571 (477-621)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø571 (351-662)
Power button
Power button
Good key height
Good key height
Keyboard backlight
Keyboard backlight
360
cd/m²		388
cd/m²		378
cd/m²
345
cd/m²		365
cd/m²		364
cd/m²
325
cd/m²		332
cd/m²		352
cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling
AU Optronics AUO31EB
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 388 cd/m² Gemiddelde: 356.6 cd/m² Minimum: 21 cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling: 84 %
Helderheid in Batterij-modus: 370 cd/m²
Contrast: 1327:1 (Zwart: 0.275 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.4 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6, calibrated: 4.3
ΔE Greyscale 2.3 | 0.64-98 Ø6.2
100% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 88% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.08
Acer ConceptD 7 CN715-71-743N
AU Optronics AUO31EB, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6		Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH
BOE NV156FHM-N4G (BOE084D), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6		MSI GL65 9SEK
AU Optronics B156HAN13.0, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6		Asus Strix GL531GV-PB74
Panda LM156LF-GL02, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6		Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2060
AU Optronics B173HAN04.0, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3		Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti
BOE NV156FHM-N4K, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Response Times
75%
23%
31%
79%
70%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
49 (24, 25)
8.8 (4.4, 4.4)
82%
26.4 (13.2, 13.2)
46%
26 (13.6, 12.4)
47%
6.8 (3.6, 3.2)
86%
13.6 (7.2, 6.4)
72%
Response Time Black / White *
30 (17, 13)
10 (5.6, 4.4)
67%
30 (17.6, 12.4)
-0%
25.6 (14.8, 10.8)
15%
8.8 (4.4, 4.4)
71%
10 (6, 4)
67%
PWM Frequency
200 (99)
Screen
-5%
-26%
-44%
5%
-9%
Brightness middle
365
284
-22%
277.3
-24%
290.1
-21%
300.4
-18%
312.7
-14%
Brightness
357
277
-22%
256
-28%
274
-23%
289
-19%
305
-15%
Brightness Distribution
84
87
4%
86
2%
86
2%
93
11%
90
7%
Black Level *
0.275
0.3
-9%
0.2
27%
0.54
-96%
0.32
-16%
0.27
2%
Contrast
1327
947
-29%
1387
5%
537
-60%
939
-29%
1158
-13%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.4
3.53
20%
5.25
-19%
5.16
-17%
2.32
47%
4.57
-4%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
10.2
6.11
40%
19.43
-90%
18.09
-77%
3.81
63%
6.81
33%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
4.3
1.81
58%
4.39
-2%
4.35
-1%
2.95
31%
2.91
32%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
2.3
3.56
-55%
3.5
-52%
4.4
-91%
1.5
35%
4.3
-87%
Gamma
2.08 106%
2.47 89%
2.1 105%
2.1 105%
2.3 96%
2.29 96%
CCT
6336 103%
7257 90%
6895 94%
7362 88%
6764 96%
7098 92%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
88
59
-33%
35
-60%
38.1
-57%
57.4
-35%
59.4
-32%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
100
91
-9%
55
-45%
60
-40%
89
-11%
91.3
-9%
Totaal Gemiddelde (Programma / Instellingen)
35% / 7%
-2% / -18%
-7% / -32%
42% / 17%
31% / 3%

* ... kleiner is beter

Responstijd Scherm

ℹ
De responstijden van het scherm tonen hoe snel het scherm in staat is om van één kleur naar de andere te veranderen. Trage responstijden kunnen aanleiding geven tot 'nabeelden' rond bewegende objecten of het scherm wazig maken (blur). Vooral spelers van snelle 3D-games hebben baat bij een scherm met snelle responstijden.
   ↔    Responstijd Zwart naar Wit
30 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd↗ 17 ms stijging
↘ 13 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde trage responstijden in onze tests en is misschien te traag voor games.
Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.8 (minimum) tot 240 (maximum) ms. » 73 % van alle toestellen zijn beter.
Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd slechter is dan het gemiddelde (24.8 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.
   ↔    Responstijd 50% Grijs naar 80% Grijs
49 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd↗ 24 ms stijging
↘ 25 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde trage responstijden in onze tests en is misschien te traag voor games.
Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.9 (minimum) tot 636 (maximum) ms. » 82 % van alle toestellen zijn beter.
Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd slechter is dan het gemiddelde (39.5 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
Om de schermhelderheid te verlagen schakelen sommige laptops het backlight erg snel aan en uit. Dit gebeurt aan een dergelijk hoge frequentie dat het niet zichtbaar is voor het menselijk oog. Als de frequentie te laag is kunnen personen met gevoelige ogen geïrriteerd geraken, hoofdpijn krijgen en zelfs flickering waarnemen.
Screen flickering / PWM niet waargenomen

Ter vergelijking: 51 % van alle geteste toestellen maakten geen gebruik van PWM om de schermhelderheid te verlagen. Als het wel werd gebruikt, werd een gemiddelde van 9259 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz waargenomen.

010203040506070809010011012013014015016017018019020021022023024025026027028029030031032033034035036037038039040041042043044045046047048049050051052053054055056057058059060061062063064065066067068069070071072073074075076077078079080081082083084085086087088089090091092093094095096097098099010001010102010301040105010601070108010901100111011201130114011501160117011801190120012101220123012401250126012701280Tooltip
Acer ConceptD 7 CN715-71-743N Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø957 (950.3-1045.94)
Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1208 (1186.17-1271.21)
MSI GL65 9SEK Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1185 (1166.86-1278.16)
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2060 Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1066 (1058.57-1172.68)
Cinebench R15 | Cinebench R11.5 | Cinebench R10
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH
Intel Core i7-9750H
188 Points ∼100% 0%
Acer ConceptD 7 CN715-71-743N
Intel Core i7-9750H
188 Points ∼100%
MSI GL65 9SEK
Intel Core i7-9750H
188 Points ∼100% 0%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H
  (170 - 194, n=59)
183 Points ∼97% -3%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2060
Intel Core i7-9750H
181 Points ∼96% -4%
Asus Strix GL531GV-PB74
Intel Core i7-9750H
179 Points ∼95% -5%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti
Intel Core i7-9750H
170 Points ∼90% -10%
Average of class Multimedia
  (36 - 201, n=371)
128 Points ∼68% -32%
CPU Multi 64Bit
MSI GL65 9SEK
Intel Core i7-9750H
1281 Points ∼100% +22%
Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH
Intel Core i7-9750H
1271 Points ∼99% +22%
Asus Strix GL531GV-PB74
Intel Core i7-9750H
1226 Points ∼96% +17%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H
  (964 - 1306, n=61)
1187 Points ∼93% +13%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2060
Intel Core i7-9750H
1159 Points ∼90% +11%
Acer ConceptD 7 CN715-71-743N
Intel Core i7-9750H
1046 Points ∼82%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti
Intel Core i7-9750H
964 Points ∼75% -8%
Average of class Multimedia
  (73 - 1550, n=387)
489 Points ∼38% -53%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Acer ConceptD 7 CN715-71-743N
Intel Core i7-9750H
2.17 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H
  (1.96 - 2.19, n=7)
2.09 Points ∼96% -4%
Asus Strix GL531GV-PB74
Intel Core i7-9750H
2.04 Points ∼94% -6%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2060
Intel Core i7-9750H
2.02 Points ∼93% -7%
Average of class Multimedia
  (0.39 - 2.28, n=419)
1.297 Points ∼60% -40%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Asus Strix GL531GV-PB74
Intel Core i7-9750H
13.57 Points ∼100% +21%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H
  (11.3 - 14.1, n=7)
12.8 Points ∼94% +14%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2060
Intel Core i7-9750H
12.74 Points ∼94% +13%
Acer ConceptD 7 CN715-71-743N
Intel Core i7-9750H
11.26 Points ∼83%
Average of class Multimedia
  (0.59 - 17.6, n=685)
3.77 Points ∼28% -67%
Cinebench R10
Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit
Acer ConceptD 7 CN715-71-743N
Intel Core i7-9750H
9081 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H
  (9069 - 9081, n=2)
9075 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1011 - 9435, n=513)
4459 Points ∼49% -51%
Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit
Acer ConceptD 7 CN715-71-743N
Intel Core i7-9750H
38960 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H
  (37188 - 38960, n=2)
38074 Points ∼98% -2%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1968 - 45795, n=513)
12050 Points ∼31% -69%
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit
9081 Points
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit
38960 Points
Cinebench R10 Shading 64Bit
6820 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
11.26 Points
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
78.51 fps
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
2.17 Points
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
115.28 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1046 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
188 Points
Help
PCMark 10 | PCMark 8
PCMark 10
Digital Content Creation
Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH
GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 9750H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
8069 Points ∼100% +21%
MSI GL65 9SEK
GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 9750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
7104 Points ∼88% +7%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop)
  (6641 - 8069, n=12)
7038 Points ∼87% +6%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2060
GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
6860 Points ∼85% +3%
Asus Strix GL531GV-PB74
GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 9750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
6673 Points ∼83% 0%
Acer ConceptD 7 CN715-71-743N
GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 9750H, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G
6670 Points ∼83%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop), 9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
5898 Points ∼73% -12%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1001 - 7161, n=102)
3761 Points ∼47% -44%
Productivity
MSI GL65 9SEK
GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 9750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
7748 Points ∼100% +3%
Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH
GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 9750H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
7631 Points ∼98% +1%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2060
GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
7585 Points ∼98% +1%
Acer ConceptD 7 CN715-71-743N
GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 9750H, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G
7544 Points ∼97%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop)
  (6948 - 8106, n=12)
7491 Points ∼97% -1%
Asus Strix GL531GV-PB74
GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 9750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
7431 Points ∼96% -1%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop), 9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
7290 Points ∼94% -3%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1407 - 8020, n=103)
6191 Points ∼80% -18%
Essentials
Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH
GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 9750H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
9509 Points ∼100% +9%
MSI GL65 9SEK
GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 9750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
9431 Points ∼99% +8%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop), 9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
9405 Points ∼99% +8%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2060
GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
9364 Points ∼98% +7%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop)
  (8729 - 10056, n=12)
9357 Points ∼98% +7%
Asus Strix GL531GV-PB74
GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 9750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
9245 Points ∼97% +6%
Acer ConceptD 7 CN715-71-743N
GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 9750H, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G
8729 Points ∼92%
Average of class Multimedia
  (2891 - 9829, n=103)
7549 Points ∼79% -14%
Score
Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH
GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 9750H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
5997 Points ∼100% +10%
MSI GL65 9SEK
GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 9750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
5761 Points ∼96% +6%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop)
  (5368 - 5997, n=12)
5661 Points ∼94% +4%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2060
GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
5641 Points ∼94% +4%
Asus Strix GL531GV-PB74
GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 9750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
5528 Points ∼92% +1%
Acer ConceptD 7 CN715-71-743N
GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 9750H, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G
5449 Points ∼91%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop), 9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
5301 Points ∼88% -3%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1144 - 5469, n=103)
3977 Points ∼66% -27%
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH
GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 9750H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
5901 Points ∼100% +33%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2060
GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
5676 Points ∼96% +28%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop)
  (4450 - 5931, n=10)
5511 Points ∼93% +24%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop), 9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
5480 Points ∼93% +23%
Asus Strix GL531GV-PB74
GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 9750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
5419 Points ∼92% +22%
MSI GL65 9SEK
GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 9750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
5287 Points ∼90% +19%
Acer ConceptD 7 CN715-71-743N
GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 9750H, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G
4450 Points ∼75%
Average of class Multimedia
  (2213 - 5651, n=285)
4307 Points ∼73% -3%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH
GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 9750H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
5185 Points ∼100% +47%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2060
GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
4401 Points ∼85% +25%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop)
  (3533 - 5185, n=10)
4391 Points ∼85% +24%
Asus Strix GL531GV-PB74
GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 9750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
4251 Points ∼82% +20%
MSI GL65 9SEK
GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 9750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
4136 Points ∼80% +17%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop), 9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
4074 Points ∼79% +15%
Acer ConceptD 7 CN715-71-743N
GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 9750H, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G
3533 Points ∼68%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1371 - 4693, n=306)
3384 Points ∼65% -4%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
3533 punten
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
4450 punten
Help
Acer ConceptD 7 CN715-71-743N
WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G		Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR		MSI GL65 9SEK
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G		Asus Strix GL531GV-PB74
Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8		Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2060
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ		Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ		Average WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G
 
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
3%
-12%
-21%
-6%
-6%
3%
Write 4K
108.98
131.7
21%
150.2
38%
121.9
12%
124.1
14%
135
24%
136 (109 - 194, n=5)
25%
Read 4K
41.33
48.06
16%
43.46
5%
53.62
30%
44.75
8%
41.1
-1%
41.4 (29.1 - 51.2, n=5)
0%
Write Seq
2534.91
1234
-51%
1412
-44%
966.9
-62%
1292
-49%
1427
-44%
2161 (1584 - 2535, n=5)
-15%
Read Seq
1537.92
972.5
-37%
1340
-13%
1461
-5%
1272
-17%
1494
-3%
1855 (1538 - 2512, n=5)
21%
Write 4K Q32T1
396.65
576.3
45%
482.2
22%
431.4
9%
514.1
30%
494.9
25%
421 (357 - 536, n=5)
6%
Read 4K Q32T1
603.14
655.1
9%
534.6
-11%
337.3
-44%
595.7
-1%
578.2
-4%
497 (364 - 603, n=5)
-18%
Write Seq Q32T1
2542.4
3012
18%
1454
-43%
971.5
-62%
1892
-26%
1417
-44%
2540 (2536 - 2542, n=5)
0%
Read Seq Q32T1
3324.1
3481
5%
1744
-48%
1727
-48%
3209
-3%
3251
-2%
3362 (3218 - 3489, n=5)
1%
AS SSD
19%
-31%
-24%
2%
-23%
3%
Copy Game MB/s
1025.86
1217.53
19%
943.02
-8%
835.38
-19%
1149.77
12%
972 (921 - 1026, n=3)
-5%
Copy Program MB/s
433.68
889.12
105%
749.45
73%
588.06
36%
513.29
18%
468 (434 - 498, n=3)
8%
Copy ISO MB/s
1592.23
1278.63
-20%
1518.69
-5%
1983.99
25%
1539.06
-3%
1616 (1446 - 1810, n=3)
1%
Score Total
4181
5087
22%
2485
-41%
1711
-59%
4135
-1%
3177
-24%
4228 (4175 - 4329, n=5)
1%
Score Write
1811
2256
25%
976
-46%
958
-47%
2033
12%
1450
-20%
1838 (1794 - 1927, n=5)
1%
Score Read
1579
1851
17%
996
-37%
498
-68%
1385
-12%
1152
-27%
1599 (1579 - 1621, n=5)
1%
Access Time Write *
0.036
0.03
17%
0.091
-153%
0.046
-28%
0.035
3%
0.104
-189%
0.0303 (0.023 - 0.036, n=4)
16%
Access Time Read *
0.073
0.039
47%
0.116
-59%
0.058
21%
0.057
22%
0.063
14%
0.078 (0.065 - 0.088, n=4)
-7%
4K-64 Write
1472.81
1883.05
28%
720.16
-51%
760.81
-48%
1747.69
19%
1212.2
-18%
1481 (1432 - 1546, n=5)
1%
4K-64 Read
1257.25
1599.04
27%
838.68
-33%
321.15
-74%
1155.86
-8%
917.46
-27%
1270 (1257 - 1286, n=5)
1%
4K Write
101.82
124.26
22%
118.19
16%
107.03
5%
106.01
4%
105.96
4%
132 (102 - 162, n=5)
30%
4K Read
43.39
56.71
31%
25.31
-42%
48.73
12%
48.43
12%
51.32
18%
42.8 (39.3 - 45.7, n=5)
-1%
Seq Write
2364
2483.66
5%
1378.16
-42%
904.89
-62%
1796.5
-24%
1315.15
-44%
2255 (2009 - 2381, n=5)
-5%
Seq Read
2785
1954.25
-30%
1315.25
-53%
1280.44
-54%
1809.65
-35%
1828.99
-34%
2866 (2785 - 2927, n=5)
3%
Totaal Gemiddelde (Programma / Instellingen)
11% / 12%
-22% / -24%
-23% / -23%
-2% / -0%
-15% / -17%
3% / 3%

* ... kleiner is beter

CrystalDiskMark 3.0
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
AS SSD
hddimg
WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G
Sequential Read: 1582.5 MB/s
Sequential Write: 2389.7 MB/s
512K Read: 1244.61 MB/s
512K Write: 1177.7 MB/s
4K Read: 35.43 MB/s
4K Write: 92.98 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 398.68 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 257.69 MB/s
3DMark 11 | 3DMark
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2060
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H
22299 Points ∼100% +12%
MSI GL65 9SEK
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H
21075 Points ∼95% +6%
Asus Strix GL531GV-PB74
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H
20723 Points ∼93% +4%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop)
  (19513 - 22299, n=18)
20627 Points ∼93% +4%
Acer ConceptD 7 CN715-71-743N
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H
19882 Points ∼89%
Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H
19537 Points ∼88% -2%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H
19329 Points ∼87% -3%
Average of class Multimedia
  (352 - 20837, n=639)
3006 Points ∼13% -85%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2060
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H
16647 Points ∼100% +7%
MSI GL65 9SEK
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H
16331 Points ∼98% +5%
Asus Strix GL531GV-PB74
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H
15913 Points ∼96% +2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop)
  (14768 - 17119, n=17)
15825 Points ∼95% +2%
Acer ConceptD 7 CN715-71-743N
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H
15552 Points ∼93%
Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H
14970 Points ∼90% -4%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H
14753 Points ∼89% -5%
Average of class Multimedia
  (337 - 16100, n=413)
2895 Points ∼17% -81%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2060
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H
112676 Points ∼100% +104%
MSI GL65 9SEK
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H
107016 Points ∼95% +93%
Asus Strix GL531GV-PB74
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H
100726 Points ∼89% +82%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H
98452 Points ∼87% +78%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop)
  (55324 - 112768, n=17)
97759 Points ∼87% +77%
Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H
95562 Points ∼85% +73%
Acer ConceptD 7 CN715-71-743N
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H
55324 Points ∼49%
Average of class Multimedia
  (2468 - 77755, n=418)
16980 Points ∼15% -69%
3DMark 11 Performance
16394 punten
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
25480 punten
3DMark Fire Strike Score
13724 punten
Help
The Witcher 3 | Rise of the Tomb Raider | Doom
The Witcher 3
3840x2160 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Acer ConceptD 7 CN715-71-743N
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop)
26 fps ∼100%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop)
 
26 fps ∼100% 0%
Average of class Multimedia
  (15.5 - 26, n=2)
20.8 fps ∼80% -20%
3840x2160 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop)
  (38 - 41.3, n=3)
40 fps ∼100% +5%
Acer ConceptD 7 CN715-71-743N
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop)
38 fps ∼95%
Average of class Multimedia
  (12 - 42.3, n=12)
22.3 fps ∼56% -41%
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2060
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop)
65 fps ∼100% +14%
Asus Strix GL531GV-PB74
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop)
63.3 fps ∼97% +11%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop)
  (55.1 - 66, n=18)
59.3 fps ∼91% +4%
MSI GL65 9SEK
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop)
58.7 fps ∼90% +3%
Acer ConceptD 7 CN715-71-743N
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop)
57 fps ∼88%
Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop)
56.7 fps ∼87% -1%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
51.6 fps ∼79% -9%
Average of class Multimedia
  (2.9 - 80.8, n=99)
19.8 fps ∼30% -65%
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2060
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop)
118.5 fps ∼100% +11%
MSI GL65 9SEK
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop)
117.5 fps ∼99% +10%
Asus Strix GL531GV-PB74
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop)
117.4 fps ∼99% +10%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop)
  (104 - 119, n=16)
111 fps ∼94% +4%
Acer ConceptD 7 CN715-71-743N
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop)
107 fps ∼90%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
97.5 fps ∼82% -9%
Average of class Multimedia
  (3.8 - 117, n=110)
29.8 fps ∼25% -72%
Rise of the Tomb Raider
3840x2160 High Preset AA:FX AF:4x
Acer ConceptD 7 CN715-71-743N
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop)
39 fps ∼100%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop)
 
39 fps ∼100% 0%
Average of class Multimedia
  (12 - 39, n=12)
18.5 fps ∼47% -53%
1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:FX AF:16x
Acer ConceptD 7 CN715-71-743N
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop)
88 fps ∼100%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop)
  (83.9 - 88, n=2)
86 fps ∼98% -2%
Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop)
83.9 fps ∼95% -5%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1.8 - 88, n=82)
25 fps ∼28% -72%
1920x1080 High Preset AA:FX AF:4x
Acer ConceptD 7 CN715-71-743N
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop)
107 fps ∼100%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop)
 
107 fps ∼100% 0%
Average of class Multimedia
  (2.5 - 107, n=101)
27 fps ∼25% -75%
1366x768 Medium Preset AF:2x
Acer ConceptD 7 CN715-71-743N
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop)
160 fps ∼100%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop)
 
160 fps ∼100% 0%
Average of class Multimedia
  (5.3 - 160, n=109)
37.6 fps ∼24% -76%
Doom
3840x2160 High Preset AA:FX
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop)
  (50 - 55.7, n=2)
52.9 fps ∼100% +6%
Acer ConceptD 7 CN715-71-743N
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop)
50 fps ∼95%
Average of class Multimedia
  (15 - 50, n=5)
24.9 fps ∼47% -50%
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:SM
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop)
  (117 - 151, n=2)
134 fps ∼100% +15%
Acer ConceptD 7 CN715-71-743N
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop)
117 fps ∼87%
Average of class Multimedia
  (12 - 117, n=16)
39.2 fps ∼29% -66%
1920x1080 High Preset AA:FX
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop)
  (125 - 159, n=2)
142 fps ∼100% +14%
Acer ConceptD 7 CN715-71-743N
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop)
125 fps ∼88%
Average of class Multimedia
  (7.9 - 125, n=25)
30.3 fps ∼21% -76%
1920x1080 Medium Preset
Acer ConceptD 7 CN715-71-743N
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop)
127 fps ∼100%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop)
 
127 fps ∼100% 0%
Average of class Multimedia
  (27.1 - 127, n=4)
70.1 fps ∼55% -45%
0510152025303540455055606570Tooltip
Acer ConceptD 7 CN715-71-743N GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 9750H, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G: Ø55.5 (48-63)
lage gem. hoge ultra4K
The Witcher 3 (2015) 251 182 107 57 38 fps
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 202 160 107 88 39 fps
Doom (2016) 138 134 125 117 50 fps
Acer ConceptD 7 CN715-71-743N
GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 9750H, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G		Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH
GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 9750H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR		MSI GL65 9SEK
GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 9750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G		Asus Strix GL531GV-PB74
GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 9750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8		Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2060
GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ		Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop), 9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
Noise
-6%
-10%
-5%
0%
-2%
off / environment *
30.4
30
1%
28.1
8%
28.2
7%
28.2
7%
28.5
6%
Idle Minimum *
30.6
30
2%
31.4
-3%
28.8
6%
28.2
8%
30.3
1%
Idle Average *
30.6
32
-5%
31.5
-3%
31.4
-3%
28.2
8%
30.5
-0%
Idle Maximum *
30.6
34
-11%
33.5
-9%
33.3
-9%
28.2
8%
30.5
-0%
Load Average *
44
44
-0%
49.3
-12%
46.2
-5%
43
2%
41
7%
Witcher 3 ultra *
43.9
48
-9%
51.3
-17%
50.5
-15%
48.4
-10%
48
-9%
Load Maximum *
44.2
52
-18%
58
-31%
51.3
-16%
53.4
-21%
51.9
-17%

* ... kleiner is beter

Geluidsniveau

Onbelast
30.6 / 30.6 / 30.6 dB (A)
Belasting
44 / 44.2 dB (A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
stil
40 dB(A)
hoorbaar
50 dB(A)
luid
  
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm afstand)   environment noise: 30.4 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2038.834.834.734.438.82544.734.537.637.444.7314435.642.940.1444040.13234.532.340.1503529.629.731.3356334.928.929.428.434.9803128.527.926.83110029.8262727.329.812531.127.125.925.831.116026.927.124.423.726.920026.626.523.322.626.625027.526.922.222.227.531529.929.921.320.929.940027.528.221.120.227.550028.928.819.919.528.96302727.119.519.22780028.228.218.418.228.2100031.531.418.21831.5125031.231.417.91831.2160033.633.51817.533.6200034.434.717.817.534.4250036.936.91817.736.9315033.734.418.217.833.7400031.83218.21831.8500029.829.6181829.8630026.626.818.318.226.6800024.424.618.418.424.41000022.121.718.318.422.11250020.720.318.218.120.7160002119.718.418.221SPL4444.230.730.444N4.44.41.51.44.4median 28.9median 28.2median 18.4median 18.2median 28.9Delta2.421.822.4hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseAcer ConceptD 7 CN715-71-743N
Max. Belasting
 35.4 °C44.6 °C42.9 °C 
 35.1 °C43.5 °C43 °C 
 30.5 °C32 °C33 °C 
Maximum: 44.6 °C
Gemiddelde: 37.8 °C
51.6 °C57.2 °C37 °C
44.7 °C55.5 °C37.5 °C
37 °C38.1 °C34.6 °C
Maximum: 57.2 °C
Gemiddelde: 43.7 °C
Stroomadapter (max.)  56.3 °C | Kamertemperatuur 23.1 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 37.8 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 31 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Multimedia.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.6 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 36.5 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 57.2 °C / 135 F, compared to the average of 38.9 °C / 102 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.5 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 31 °C / 88 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 38.5 °C / 101 F, compared to the device average of 31 °C / 88 F.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 41 °C / 105.8 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 29.1 °C / 84.4 F (-11.9 °C / -21.4 F).
Acer ConceptD 7 CN715-71-743N
GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 9750H, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G		Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH
GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 9750H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR		MSI GL65 9SEK
GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 9750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G		Asus Strix GL531GV-PB74
GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 9750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8		Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2060
GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ		Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop), 9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
Heat
-24%
-24%
-5%
2%
-23%
Maximum Upper Side *
44.6
47
-5%
49
-10%
43.4
3%
40.6
9%
52
-17%
Maximum Bottom *
57.2
60
-5%
54.2
5%
49.2
14%
45.4
21%
52.2
9%
Idle Upper Side *
27.4
37
-35%
40.4
-47%
30.8
-12%
30
-9%
38
-39%
Idle Bottom *
27.6
41
-49%
40
-45%
34
-23%
31
-12%
40.4
-46%

* ... kleiner is beter

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2035.934.435.9253637.4363142.140.142.14035.732.335.75032.731.332.76331.728.431.78028.226.828.210037.327.337.312544.425.844.416045.523.745.520040.122.640.125052.922.252.93156020.96040062.420.262.45005819.55863060.919.260.980065.618.265.6100063.91863.9125062.81862.8160065.117.565.1200068.517.568.5250066.417.766.4315063.417.863.4400059.71859.7500056.91856.9630059.818.259.8800065.218.465.21000064.218.464.21250058.618.158.61600052.818.252.8SPL7630.476N37.71.437.7median 60median 18.2median 60Delta5.425.435.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6median 17.84.62.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseAcer ConceptD 7 CN715-71-743NApple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Acer ConceptD 7 CN715-71-743N audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (68.51 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.3% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (17% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.2% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 20% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 75% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 19%, worst was 41%
Compared to all devices tested
» 14% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 8%, average was 20%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Stroomgebruik
Uit / Standbydarklight 0.03 / 0.26 Watt
Inactiefdarkmidlight 7.6 / 13.6 / 18.2 Watt
Belasting midlight 102 / 183 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Acer ConceptD 7 CN715-71-743N
9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6		MSI GL65 9SEK
9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6		Asus Strix GL531GV-PB74
9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6		Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2060
9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3		Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti
9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop), Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6		Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH
9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6		Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop)
 		Average of class Multimedia
 
Power Consumption
-141%
-27%
-42%
-61%
-36%
-37%
4%
Idle Minimum *
7.6
41
-439%
10.9
-43%
16
-111%
18.7
-146%
15
-97%
14.6 (3.5 - 41, n=16)
-92%
11.5 (2.1 - 101, n=937)
-51%
Idle Average *
13.6
45.3
-233%
14.7
-8%
21.7
-60%
30.7
-126%
20
-47%
19.1 (6.9 - 45.3, n=16)
-40%
16 (4.2 - 122, n=937)
-18%
Idle Maximum *
18.2
47.1
-159%
32.4
-78%
26.1
-43%
33.9
-86%
33
-81%
26 (8.5 - 47.1, n=16)
-43%
19.6 (4.7 - 181, n=937)
-8%
Load Average *
102
94.9
7%
121.9
-20%
105.6
-4%
93.4
8%
88
14%
104 (86.1 - 128, n=16)
-2%
59.9 (18.5 - 164, n=916)
41%
Load Maximum *
183
214.2
-17%
209.6
-15%
225.3
-23%
195.3
-7%
213
-16%
197 (168 - 225, n=16)
-8%
78 (20.1 - 329, n=921)
57%
Witcher 3 ultra *
144
149.4
-4%
143.5
-0%
161.8
-12%
158.9
-10%
128
11%

* ... kleiner is beter

Batterijduur
Inactief (zonder WLAN, minimale helderheid)
13h 42min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
8h 38min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
6h 28min
Belast (maximale helderheid)
1h 36min
Acer ConceptD 7 CN715-71-743N
9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 84 Wh		MSI GL65 9SEK
9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 51 Wh		Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH
9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 57 Wh		Asus Strix GL531GV-PB74
9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 66 Wh		Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2060
9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 70 Wh		Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti
9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop), 65 Wh		Average of class Multimedia
 
Batterijduur
-54%
-55%
-78%
-47%
-36%
-24%
Reader / Idle
822
262
-68%
233
-72%
409 (73 - 2085, n=892)
-50%
H.264
388
363 (114 - 1053, n=107)
-6%
WiFi v1.3
518
230
-56%
192
-63%
112
-78%
272
-47%
330
-36%
362 (96 - 942, n=253)
-30%
Load
96
60
-37%
67
-30%
85.6 (32 - 238, n=894)
-11%

Pro

+ slank design
+ aluminium behuizing
+ relatief compact en licht
+ Thunderbolt 3
+ visueel aantrekkelijke backlight
+ helder scherm met hoog contrast
+ prime kleurweergave
+ goede SSD
+ relatief stil, koel en zuinig
+ grote batterij, goede batterijduur

Contra

- geen kaartlezer
- weinig afstand tussen de poorten
- luide touchpad-knoppen
- scherm met trage responstijden
- ernstige CPU-throttling
- grote prestatie-terugval in batterij-modus
- teleurstellende systeemprestaties.

Conclusie - Uitstekend scherm, zwakke prestaties

Getest: de Acer ConceptD 7, testtoestel voorzien door
Getest: de Acer ConceptD 7, testtoestel voorzien door

Dit is de verkorte versie van het originele artikel. Het volledige, Engelse testrapport vind je hier.

Acer's ConceptD wordt geadverteerd als performant multimedia-systeem voor creatievelingen. De resultaten van onze testen kunnen deze claim maar in zekere mate bevestigen. Voor meer dan 2000 euro krijgen minder prijsgevoelige kopers een elegante multimedia-laptop met een hoogwaardig uiterlijk die - gezien zijn uitstekende features - redelijk compact en licht is. Daarnaast blijft het toestel meestal koel en stil en blijft ook het energieverbruik binnen de perken.

Dit laatste heeft echter ook te maken met de relatief lage performantie van sommige componenten. De CPU in het bijzonder heeft last van ernstige throttling, de warmteontwikkeling verlaagt de prestaties nog meer omwille van de compacte behuizing en de rekenkracht krijgt in batterij-modus nog extra klappen.

Wie zijn multimedia-systeem zuiver kiest op basis van de performantie van de hardware kan zijn blik beter richten naar goedkopere concurrenten. De ConceptD heeft echter zeker nog een troef achter de hand met zijn helder 4K-scherm, dat prima kleuren en contrast weergeeft, iets wat de meeste andere multimedia-laptops niet kunnen bieden. Kiezen is dus verliezen.

De ConceptD7 is dun, stil, koel, ergonomisch, ziet er hoogwaardig uit en voelt ook zo aan. Het 4K-scherm met uitstekende kleurweergave kan een beslissende factor zijn bij de aankoopbeslissing van een grafische professional. De prestaties van de Acer (zeker de CPU) laten echter te wensen over en lopen een stuk achter ten opzichte van die van de concurrentie.

Acer ConceptD 7 CN715-71-743N - 05-11-2019 v7
Christian Hintze

Behuizing
85 / 98 → 87%
Toetsenbord
91%
Aanwijsapparaat
88%
Aansluitmogelijkheden
64 / 80 → 80%
Gewicht
62 / 20-72 → 80%
Batterij
75 / 95 → 79%
Beeldscherm
89%
Gaming-performance
90 / 90 → 100%
Applicatie-performance
85 / 90 → 95%
Temperatuur
85%
Luidheid
83 / 95 → 87%
Audio
62%
Camera
35 / 85 → 41%
Gemiddelde
76%
86%
Multimedia - Gewogen Gemiddelde

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!