Kort testrapport Toshiba Portégé A30-D (7100U, 128 GB) Subnotebook
Top 10 Testrapporten
» Top 10 Multimedia Notebooks
» Top 10 Gaming-Notebooks
» Top 10 Budget Gaming Laptops
» Top 10 Lichtgewicht Gaming-Notebooks
» Top 10 Premium Office/Business-Notebooks
» Top 10 Budget Office/Business-Notebooks
» Top 10 Workstation-Laptops
» Top 10 Subnotebooks
» Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Top 10 Notebooks tot €300
» Top 10 Notebooks tot €500
» Top 10 Notebooks tot € 1.000De beste notebookbeeldschermen zoals getest door Notebookcheck
» De beste notebookbeeldschermen
» Top Windows Alternatieven voor de MacBook Pro 13
» Top Windows Alternatieven voor de MacBook Pro 15
» Top Windows alternatieven voor de MacBook 12 en Air
» Top 10 best verkopende notebooks op Amazon
» Top 10 Convertible Notebooks
» Top 10 Tablets
» Top 10 Tablets tot € 250
» Top 10 Smartphones
» Top 10 Phablets (>90cm²)
» Top 10 Camera Smartphones
» Top 10 Smartphones tot €500
» Top 10 best verkopende smartphones op Amazon
Size Comparison
| SDCardreader Transfer Speed | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Toshiba Portege A30-D-139 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Asus Zenbook UX3410UQ-GV077T (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Toshiba Portege A30-D-139 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Asus Zenbook UX3410UQ-GV077T (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Networking | |
| iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10 | |
| Asus Zenbook UX3410UQ-GV077T | |
| Toshiba Portege A30-D-139 | |
| Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 | |
| Huawei MateBook X | |
| iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10 | |
| Toshiba Portege A30-D-139 | |
| Huawei MateBook X | |
| Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 | |
| Asus Zenbook UX3410UQ-GV077T | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Helderheidsverdeling: 88 %
Helderheid in Batterij-modus: 310 cd/m²
Contrast: 1139:1 (Zwart: 0.28 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.04 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.6
ΔE Greyscale 5.5 | 0.64-98 Ø5.9
98% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 64% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.4
| Toshiba Portege A30-D-139 Toshiba TOS508F, , 1920x1080, 13.30 | Huawei MateBook X Chi Mei CMN8201 / P130ZDZ-EF1, , 2160x1440, 13.30 | Asus Zenbook UX3410UQ-GV077T Chi Mei N140HCE-EN1, , 1920x1080, 14.00 | Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 Sharp SHP1449 LQ133M1, , 1920x1080, 13.30 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Response Times | 19% | -26% | 4% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 40 (20, 20) | 33 (15, 18) 17% | 44 (24, 20) -10% | 32.8 (16, 16.8) 18% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 30 (16, 14) | 24 (12, 12) 20% | 29 (17, 12) 3% | 33.2 (10.8, 22.4) -11% |
| PWM Frequency | 208 (10) | 60 (30) -71% | ||
| Screen | 17% | 10% | -5% | |
| Brightness middle | 319 | 408 28% | 381 19% | 351.2 10% |
| Brightness | 296 | 395 33% | 368 24% | 325 10% |
| Brightness Distribution | 88 | 88 0% | 84 -5% | 89 1% |
| Black Level * | 0.28 | 0.45 -61% | 0.3 -7% | 0.195 30% |
| Contrast | 1139 | 907 -20% | 1270 12% | 1801 58% |
| Colorchecker DeltaE2000 * | 4.04 | 1.55 62% | 2.84 30% | 7.4 -83% |
| Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. * | 8.09 | 2.19 73% | 6.5 20% | 9.08 -12% |
| Greyscale DeltaE2000 * | 5.5 | 1.91 65% | 4.02 27% | 6.71 -22% |
| Gamma | 2.4 92% | 2.34 94% | 2.42 91% | 2.74 80% |
| CCT | 7198 90% | 6491 100% | 7430 87% | 7222 90% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 64 | 61 -5% | 56 -12% | 50.48 -21% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 98 | 96 -2% | 86 -12% | 73.31 -25% |
| Totaal Gemiddelde (Programma / Instellingen) | 18% /
18% | -8% /
1% | -1% /
-4% |
* ... kleiner is beter
Responstijd Scherm
| ↔ Responstijd Zwart naar Wit | ||
|---|---|---|
| 30 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd | ↗ 16 ms stijging |  |
| ↘ 14 ms daling | ||
| Het scherm vertoonde trage responstijden in onze tests en is misschien te traag voor games. Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.8 (minimum) tot 240 (maximum) ms. » 73 % van alle toestellen zijn beter. Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd slechter is dan het gemiddelde (24.2 ms) van alle geteste toestellen. | ||
| ↔ Responstijd 50% Grijs naar 80% Grijs | ||
| 40 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd | ↗ 20 ms stijging |  |
| ↘ 20 ms daling | ||
| Het scherm vertoonde trage responstijden in onze tests en is misschien te traag voor games. Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.8 (minimum) tot 636 (maximum) ms. » 46 % van alle toestellen zijn beter. Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd vergelijkbaar is met het gemiddelde (38.5 ms) van alle geteste toestellen. | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM waargenomen | 208 Hz | ≤ 10 % helderheid instelling |  |
Het backlight van het scherm flikkert aan 208 Hz (hoogstwaarschijnlijk met PWM - Pulse-Width Modulation) aan een helderheid van 10 % en lager. Boven deze helderheid zou er geen flickering / PWM mogen optreden. De frequentie van 208 Hz is redelijk laag en de meeste mensen die gevoelig zijn aan flickering kunnen dit dus waarnemen of geïrriteerde ogen krijgen (gebruikmakend van de vermelde helderheid en lager). Ter vergelijking: 51 % van alle geteste toestellen maakten geen gebruik van PWM om de schermhelderheid te verlagen. Als het wel werd gebruikt, werd een gemiddelde van 9717 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 151500) Hz waargenomen. | |||
| PCMark 8 | |
| Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 | |
| Huawei MateBook X | |
| Toshiba Portege A30-D-139 | |
| Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Asus Zenbook UX3410UQ-GV077T | |
| Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 | |
| Huawei MateBook X | |
| Toshiba Portege A30-D-139 | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3247 punten | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4113 punten | |
Help | ||
| Toshiba Portege A30-D-139 Toshiba SG5 THNSNK128GVN8 | Huawei MateBook X LITEON CB1-SD256 | Asus Zenbook UX3410UQ-GV077T SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002 | Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | 84% | 36% | 152% | |
| Write 4k QD32 | 121.8 | 257.5 111% | 257.2 111% | 218.3 79% |
| Read 4k QD32 | 235 | 498.9 112% | 147 -37% | 479.2 104% |
| Write 4k | 79.37 | 68.14 -14% | 79.5 0% | 116.9 47% |
| Read 4k | 22.95 | 29.48 28% | 22.78 -1% | 29.31 28% |
| Write 512 | 138.7 | 310.3 124% | 288 108% | 439.9 217% |
| Read 512 | 413.5 | 504.2 22% | 289 -30% | 1036 151% |
| Write Seq | 138.5 | 461.2 233% | 323.7 134% | 732.6 429% |
| Read Seq | 471.1 | 740.6 57% | 497 5% | 1233 162% |
| 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| Asus Zenbook UX3410UQ-GV077T | |
| Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 | |
| Huawei MateBook X | |
| Toshiba Portege A30-D-139 | |
| 3DMark | |
| 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
| Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 | |
| Huawei MateBook X | |
| Toshiba Portege A30-D-139 | |
| 1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
| Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 | |
| Huawei MateBook X | |
| Toshiba Portege A30-D-139 | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 1478 punten | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 5188 punten | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 747 punten | |
Help | ||
| lage | gem. | hoge | ultra | ||
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 13.1 | fps | |||
| Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 17.2 | fps | |||
| Farming Simulator 17 (2016) | 44 | 16.9 | fps |
Geluidsniveau
| Onbelast |
| 30 / 30 / 30 dB (A) |
| DVD |
| 37 / dB (A) |
| Belasting |
| 39.3 / 38.3 dB (A) |
 | ||
30 dB stil 40 dB(A) hoorbaar 50 dB(A) luid |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm afstand) environment noise: 30 dB(A) | ||
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.2 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.5 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 36.5 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.8 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 29.4 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 29.9 °C / 85.8 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28 °C / 82.4 F (-1.9 °C / -3.4 F).
Toshiba Portege A30-D-139 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.3% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (2.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 9.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 63% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 28% worse
» The best had a delta of 8%, average was 21%, worst was 51%
Compared to all devices tested
» 61% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 31% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%
Huawei MateBook X audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (66 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 9% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 87% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 19%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 6% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%
Asus Zenbook UX3410UQ-GV077T audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (73 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 27% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 64% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 19%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 17% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 79% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (70.35 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 6.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (10.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 22% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 73% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 19%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 13% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%
| Uit / Standby | 0.14 / 0.38 Watt |
| Inactief | 3.2 / 6.8 / 8 Watt |
| Belasting |
30.4 / 28 Watt |
   
| |
| Toshiba Portege A30-D-139 i3-7100U, HD Graphics 620, Toshiba SG5 THNSNK128GVN8, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.30 | Huawei MateBook X i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, LITEON CB1-SD256, , 2160x1440, 13.30 | Asus Zenbook UX3410UQ-GV077T i7-7500U, GeForce 940MX, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00 | Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.30 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -42% | -25% | 14% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 3.2 | 4.6 -44% | 3.5 -9% | 4.1 -28% |
| Idle Average * | 6.8 | 11 -62% | 6.6 3% | 4.2 38% |
| Idle Maximum * | 8 | 12 -50% | 7.1 11% | 5.1 36% |
| Load Average * | 30.4 | 39.5 -30% | 30 1% | 22.1 27% |
| Load Maximum * | 28 | 34.6 -24% | 65 -132% | 29.4 -5% |
* ... kleiner is beter
| Toshiba Portege A30-D-139 i3-7100U, HD Graphics 620, 45 Wh | Huawei MateBook X i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 40 Wh | Asus Zenbook UX3410UQ-GV077T i7-7500U, GeForce 940MX, 48 Wh | Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 60 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Batterijduur | -30% | -7% | 16% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1008 | 512 -49% | 1295 28% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 548 | 337 -39% | 511 -7% | 677 24% |
| Load | 165 | 162 -2% | 157 -5% |
Pro
Contra
Dit is de verkorte versie van het originele artikel. Het volledige, Engelse testrapport vind je hier.
Toshiba's Portégé A30-D-139 maakt een gemengde indruk, ondanks zijn goede tot erg goede score. Dit is hoofdzakelijk te danken aan de kleinere problemen met de touchpad, evenals het onaanvaardbare geluid en de trage SSD van ons testtoestel.
De doelgroep van mobiele office-gebruikers en surfers wordt perfect bediend. In tegenstelling tot de concurrentie wordt de Portégé vergezeld door een docking-poort en beveiligingsfeatures waar enkel de merkbaar compactere Huawei MateBook X aan kan raken. Het testtoestel is hoe dan ook relatief groot en zwaar ten opzichte van de concurrentie. De tester vond dit echter nooit een belangrijk nadeel. We hebben nauwelijks klachten over de stevige, hetzij imperfect gefabriceerde behuizing.
Het toestel verdient lof omwille van zijn batterij die eenvoudig te verwijderen is van buitenaf, het prima scherm, en bovenal voor het bijna geruisloze systeem. Het feit dat de fabrikant niet voor een i5-processor heeft gekozen, maar voor de nog altijd voldoende snelle i3-7100U heeft dit mede mogelijk gemaakt. Zelfs in onze stress-test werd de chip nauwelijks tot zijn (thermische) limieten gebracht.
We kunnen deze keer slechts een voorwaardelijke aanbeveling maken. Zal het touchpad vaak gebruikt worden? Zijn het gewicht en een erg compacte/slanke behuizing belangrijk? Zal de laptop veel gebruik worden om naar muziek te luisteren? Zijn TB3 en/of DisplayPort een vereiste? Iedereen die 'nee' antwoordt op de meeste van deze vragen, kan zijn zoektocht naar een laptop beter voortzetten. Al de rest zal waarschijnlijk best tevreden zijn met de nieuwe Portégé.
Toshiba Portege A30-D-139 - 12-09-2017 v6(old)
Sven Kloevekorn