Notebookcheck

Kort testrapport Sharp Aquos D10 Smartphone

Mike Wobker, 16-11-2018

Sharp photos. De Sharp Aquos D10 probeert klanten te lokken met een camera met optische zoom en zijn bijna randvrije ontwerp. De D10 heeft een Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 SoC en dubbele 12 & 13 MP PDAF-camera's. Lees verder om erachter te komen of de D10 net zo goed presteert als hij eruit ziet.

Sharp D10
Grafische kaart
Qualcomm Adreno 508
Geheugen
4096 MB 
Beeldscherm
5.9 inch 18:9, 2160 x 1080 pixel 403 PPI, Capacitief touchscreen, IPS, glimmend: ja
Opslag
64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 GB 
, 55 GB beschikbaar
Verbindingen
1 USB 2.0, Card Reader: Tot 128 GB microSD kaarten, 1 Vingerafdruklezer, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensoren: Versnellingsmeter, Kompas, Gyroscoop, Nabijheidssensor
Netwerkmogelijkheden
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.0, GSM: 850, 900, 1,800, 1,900. 3G/UMTS: 850, 900, 1,900, 2,100. 4G LTE Cat.4/FDD: B1, B3, B5, B7, B8, B20., Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Afmetingen
hoogte x breedte x diepte (in mm): 8 x 148.2 x 74.2
Batterij
2900 mAh Lithium-Ion, Gesprekstijd 2G (volgens fabrikant): 20 h, Standby 2G (volgens fabrikant): 555 h
Besturingssysteem
Android 8.0 Oreo
Camera
Primary Camera: 12 MPix
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix
Bijkomende functionaliteiten
Luidsprekers: Enkele luidspreker, Toetsenbord: Virtueel toetsenbord, Toetsenbordverlichting: ja, USB lader, USB Type-A naar Type-C kabel, Hoes, USB Type-C naar 3.5mm poort adapter, Sharp UI, 24 Maanden Garantie, SAR waardes: Body - 0.944 W/kg, Head - 0.308 W/kg, fanless
Gewicht
165 g, Voeding: 61 g
Prijs
390 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Sharp D10
Sharp D10
Sharp D10

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Sharp D10
Adreno 508, 630, 64 GB eMMC Flash
336 (min: 287, max: 344) MBit/s ∼100%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
Adreno 508, 630, 32 GB eMMC Flash
309 MBit/s ∼92% -8%
Sharp Aquos C10
Adreno 508, 630, 64 GB eMMC Flash
308 MBit/s ∼92% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 939, n=311)
212 MBit/s ∼63% -37%
LG Q7 Plus
Mali-T860 MP2, MT6750S, 64 GB eMMC Flash
42.7 MBit/s ∼13% -87%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
Adreno 508, 630, 32 GB eMMC Flash
347 MBit/s ∼100% +113%
Sharp Aquos C10
Adreno 508, 630, 64 GB eMMC Flash
313 MBit/s ∼90% +92%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 703, n=311)
206 MBit/s ∼59% +26%
Sharp D10
Adreno 508, 630, 64 GB eMMC Flash
163 (min: 79, max: 172) MBit/s ∼47%
LG Q7 Plus
Mali-T860 MP2, MT6750S, 64 GB eMMC Flash
54.5 MBit/s ∼16% -67%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø336 (287-344)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø161 (79-172)
GPS test: Sharp D10 - Overzicht
GPS test: Sharp D10 - Overzicht
GPS test: Sharp D10 - Lus
GPS test: Sharp D10 - Lus
GPS test: Sharp D10 – Bos
GPS test: Sharp D10 – Bos
GPS test: Garmin Edge 520 - Overzicht
GPS test: Garmin Edge 520 - Overzicht
GPS test: Garmin Edge 520 - Lus
GPS test: Garmin Edge 520 - Lus
GPS test: Garmin Edge 520 - Bos
GPS test: Garmin Edge 520 - Bos

Beeldvergelijking

Bekijk een scène en navigeer binnen het eerste beeld. Eén klik wijzigt het zoomniveau. Eén klik op het ingezoomde beeld opent het origineel in een nieuw venster. Het eerste beeld toont de verschaalde foto van het testtoestel.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
klik om beelden te laden
Een foto van onze testkaart
Een foto van onze testkaart
Onze testkaart in detail
684
cd/m²
723
cd/m²
750
cd/m²
676
cd/m²
745
cd/m²
757
cd/m²
708
cd/m²
722
cd/m²
738
cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 757 cd/m² Gemiddelde: 722.6 cd/m² Minimum: 3.27 cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling: 89 %
Helderheid in Batterij-modus: 745 cd/m²
Contrast: 1242:1 (Zwart: 0.6 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.52 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.2
ΔE Greyscale 5.8 | 0.64-98 Ø6.5
99.4% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.262
Sharp D10
IPS, 2160x1080, 5.9
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
IPS, 2160x1080, 6
LG Q7 Plus
IPS, 2160x1080, 5.5
Sharp Aquos C10
IPS, 2040x1080, 5.5
Screen
24%
-22%
-14%
Brightness middle
745
597
-20%
431
-42%
548
-26%
Brightness
723
592
-18%
419
-42%
535
-26%
Brightness Distribution
89
92
3%
89
0%
92
3%
Black Level *
0.6
0.32
47%
0.58
3%
0.49
18%
Contrast
1242
1866
50%
743
-40%
1118
-10%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.52
2.4
47%
6.2
-37%
5.21
-15%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
9.14
5.3
42%
10.1
-11%
13.47
-47%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
5.8
3.4
41%
6.2
-7%
6.1
-5%
Gamma
2.262 97%
2.2 100%
2.26 97%
2.228 99%
CCT
7660 85%
7172 91%
8064 81%
7538 86%

* ... kleiner is beter

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Om de schermhelderheid te verlagen schakelen sommige laptops het backlight erg snel aan en uit. Dit gebeurt aan een dergelijk hoge frequentie dat het niet zichtbaar is voor het menselijk oog. Als de frequentie te laag is kunnen personen met gevoelige ogen geïrriteerd geraken, hoofdpijn krijgen en zelfs flickering waarnemen.
Screen flickering / PWM waargenomen 2358 Hz ≤ 20 % helderheid instelling

Het backlight van het scherm flikkert aan 2358 Hz (hoogstwaarschijnlijk met PWM - Pulse-Width Modulation) aan een helderheid van 20 % en lager. Boven deze helderheid zou er geen flickering / PWM mogen optreden.

De frequentie van 2358 Hz is redelijk hoog en de meeste mensen die gevoelig zijn aan flickering zouden dit dus niet mogen waarnemen of geïrriteerde ogen krijgen.

Ter vergelijking: 53 % van alle geteste toestellen maakten geen gebruik van PWM om de schermhelderheid te verlagen. Als het wel werd gebruikt, werd een gemiddelde van 8929 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz waargenomen.

Responstijd Scherm

De responstijden van het scherm tonen hoe snel het scherm in staat is om van één kleur naar de andere te veranderen. Trage responstijden kunnen aanleiding geven tot 'nabeelden' rond bewegende objecten of het scherm wazig maken (blur). Vooral spelers van snelle 3D-games hebben baat bij een scherm met snelle responstijden.
       Responstijd Zwart naar Wit
20 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd↗ 5 ms stijging
↘ 15 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde prima responstijden in onze tests maar is misschien wat te traag voor competitieve games.
Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.8 (minimum) tot 240 (maximum) ms. » 19 % van alle toestellen zijn beter.
Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd beter is dan het gemiddelde (25.6 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.
       Responstijd 50% Grijs naar 80% Grijs
42 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd↗ 11 ms stijging
↘ 31 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde trage responstijden in onze tests en is misschien te traag voor games.
Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.9 (minimum) tot 636 (maximum) ms. » 53 % van alle toestellen zijn beter.
Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd vergelijkbaar is met het gemiddelde (41 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.
Geekbench 4.1/4.2
Compute RenderScript Score (sorteer op waarde)
Sharp D10
3728 Points ∼26%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
3621 Points ∼26% -3%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
14160 Points ∼100% +280%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
13496 Points ∼95% +262%
LG Q7 Plus
2084 Points ∼15% -44%
Sharp Aquos C10
2910 Points ∼21% -22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (2910 - 3956, n=11)
3714 Points ∼26% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (836 - 21070, n=198)
4508 Points ∼32% +21%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sorteer op waarde)
Sharp D10
4203 Points ∼47%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
4152 Points ∼46% -1%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
9014 Points ∼100% +114%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
8849 Points ∼98% +111%
LG Q7 Plus
2135 Points ∼24% -49%
Sharp Aquos C10
2246 Points ∼25% -47%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (883 - 4234, n=12)
3733 Points ∼41% -11%
Average of class Smartphone (883 - 11598, n=248)
4298 Points ∼48% +2%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sorteer op waarde)
Sharp D10
875 Points ∼36%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
858 Points ∼35% -2%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
2457 Points ∼100% +181%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
2425 Points ∼99% +177%
LG Q7 Plus
639 Points ∼26% -27%
Sharp Aquos C10
710 Points ∼29% -19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (710 - 4210, n=12)
1132 Points ∼46% +29%
Average of class Smartphone (394 - 4824, n=249)
1267 Points ∼52% +45%
PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sorteer op waarde)
Sharp D10
5796 Points ∼55%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
5659 Points ∼54% -2%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
10571 Points ∼100% +82%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
9971 Points ∼94% +72%
LG Q7 Plus
3969 Points ∼38% -32%
Sharp Aquos C10
5377 Points ∼51% -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (5083 - 6264, n=12)
5689 Points ∼54% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (4058 - 13531, n=424)
4956 Points ∼47% -14%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Sharp D10
1697 Points ∼48%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
1756 Points ∼50% +3%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
3515 Points ∼100% +107%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
3512 Points ∼100% +107%
LG Q7 Plus
999 Points ∼28% -41%
Sharp Aquos C10
1674 Points ∼48% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (1664 - 1778, n=12)
1714 Points ∼49% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (2293 - 4439, n=277)
1709 Points ∼49% +1%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Sharp D10
806 Points ∼14%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
793 Points ∼14% -2%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
5747 Points ∼100% +613%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
5641 Points ∼98% +600%
LG Q7 Plus
316 Points ∼5% -61%
Sharp Aquos C10
767 Points ∼13% -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (767 - 809, n=12)
798 Points ∼14% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (869 - 8206, n=277)
1465 Points ∼25% +82%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sorteer op waarde)
Sharp D10
912 Points ∼18%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
903 Points ∼18% -1%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
5036 Points ∼100% +452%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
4971 Points ∼99% +445%
LG Q7 Plus
373 Points ∼7% -59%
Sharp Aquos C10
872 Points ∼17% -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (872 - 919, n=12)
905 Points ∼18% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (1010 - 5189, n=280)
1360 Points ∼27% +49%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Sharp D10
1711 Points ∼49%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
1744 Points ∼50% +2%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
3486 Points ∼100% +104%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
3148 Points ∼90% +84%
LG Q7 Plus
976 Points ∼28% -43%
Sharp Aquos C10
1714 Points ∼49% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (1657 - 1819, n=12)
1731 Points ∼50% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (375 - 4493, n=293)
1686 Points ∼48% -1%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Sharp D10
1325 Points ∼16%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
1303 Points ∼16% -2%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
8352 Points ∼100% +530%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
8291 Points ∼99% +526%
LG Q7 Plus
493 Points ∼6% -63%
Sharp Aquos C10
1244 Points ∼15% -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (1204 - 1332, n=12)
1302 Points ∼16% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (131 - 14951, n=293)
2062 Points ∼25% +56%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sorteer op waarde)
Sharp D10
1395 Points ∼22%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
1381 Points ∼22% -1%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
6375 Points ∼100% +357%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
6083 Points ∼95% +336%
LG Q7 Plus
554 Points ∼9% -60%
Sharp Aquos C10
1325 Points ∼21% -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (1299 - 1415, n=12)
1379 Points ∼22% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (159 - 7856, n=294)
1729 Points ∼27% +24%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Sharp D10
1755 Points ∼51%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
1712 Points ∼49% -2%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
3473 Points ∼100% +98%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
3399 Points ∼98% +94%
LG Q7 Plus
1031 Points ∼30% -41%
Sharp Aquos C10
1719 Points ∼49% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (1631 - 1822, n=12)
1742 Points ∼50% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (2281 - 4216, n=352)
1642 Points ∼47% -6%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Sharp D10
723 Points ∼14%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
718 Points ∼14% -1%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
5158 Points ∼100% +613%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
5144 Points ∼100% +611%
LG Q7 Plus
80 Points ∼2% -89%
Sharp Aquos C10
712 Points ∼14% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (707 - 729, n=12)
719 Points ∼14% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (815 - 5241, n=352)
1186 Points ∼23% +64%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sorteer op waarde)
Sharp D10
832 Points ∼18%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
824 Points ∼18% -1%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
4656 Points ∼100% +460%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
4617 Points ∼99% +455%
LG Q7 Plus
101 Points ∼2% -88%
Sharp Aquos C10
819 Points ∼18% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (811 - 839, n=12)
827 Points ∼18% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (951 - 4734, n=360)
1134 Points ∼24% +36%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Sharp D10
1743 Points ∼50%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
1757 Points ∼50% +1%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
3482 Points ∼100% +100%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
3392 Points ∼97% +95%
LG Q7 Plus
1029 Points ∼30% -41%
Sharp Aquos C10
1725 Points ∼50% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (1698 - 1816, n=12)
1751 Points ∼50% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (532 - 4215, n=385)
1538 Points ∼44% -12%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Sharp D10
1269 Points ∼15%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
1248 Points ∼15% -2%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
8236 Points ∼100% +549%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
8179 Points ∼99% +545%
LG Q7 Plus
96 Points ∼1% -92%
Sharp Aquos C10
1286 Points ∼16% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (1234 - 1289, n=12)
1259 Points ∼15% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (46 - 8312, n=385)
1627 Points ∼20% +28%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sorteer op waarde)
Sharp D10
1351 Points ∼21%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
1334 Points ∼21% -1%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
6293 Points ∼100% +366%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
6252 Points ∼99% +363%
LG Q7 Plus
120 Points ∼2% -91%
Sharp Aquos C10
1363 Points ∼22% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (1318 - 1374, n=12)
1343 Points ∼21% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (58 - 6454, n=393)
1384 Points ∼22% +2%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Sharp D10
13090 Points ∼37%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
13217 Points ∼37% +1%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
35290 Points ∼100% +170%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
34665 Points ∼98% +165%
LG Q7 Plus
9903 Points ∼28% -24%
Sharp Aquos C10
12667 Points ∼36% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (12667 - 13217, n=12)
13007 Points ∼37% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (3958 - 37475, n=540)
12875 Points ∼36% -2%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sorteer op waarde)
Sharp D10
18635 Points ∼22%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
18472 Points ∼22% -1%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
84681 Points ∼100% +354%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
80166 Points ∼95% +330%
LG Q7 Plus
9656 Points ∼11% -48%
Sharp Aquos C10
16508 Points ∼19% -11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (16508 - 18635, n=12)
18313 Points ∼22% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (2465 - 162695, n=540)
17971 Points ∼21% -4%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sorteer op waarde)
Sharp D10
17032 Points ∼26%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
16972 Points ∼26% 0%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
64592 Points ∼100% +279%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
62063 Points ∼96% +264%
LG Q7 Plus
9710 Points ∼15% -43%
Sharp Aquos C10
15466 Points ∼24% -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (15466 - 17032, n=12)
16789 Points ∼26% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (2915 - 77599, n=541)
15098 Points ∼23% -11%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sorteer op waarde)
Sharp D10
30 fps ∼20%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
30 fps ∼20% 0%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
150 fps ∼100% +400%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
149 fps ∼99% +397%
LG Q7 Plus
17 fps ∼11% -43%
Sharp Aquos C10
30 fps ∼20% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (29 - 30, n=12)
29.8 fps ∼20% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (4.1 - 251, n=565)
31.3 fps ∼21% +4%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sorteer op waarde)
Sharp D10
29 fps ∼48%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
28 fps ∼47% -3%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
60 fps ∼100% +107%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
60 fps ∼100% +107%
LG Q7 Plus
16 fps ∼27% -45%
Sharp Aquos C10
30 fps ∼50% +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (28 - 31, n=12)
29.5 fps ∼49% +2%
Average of class Smartphone (6.9 - 120, n=568)
24.9 fps ∼42% -14%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sorteer op waarde)
Sharp D10
13 fps ∼16%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
14 fps ∼17% +8%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
82 fps ∼100% +531%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
80 fps ∼98% +515%
LG Q7 Plus
7.1 fps ∼9% -45%
Sharp Aquos C10
14 fps ∼17% +8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (13 - 14, n=12)
13.9 fps ∼17% +7%
Average of class Smartphone (2.2 - 132, n=487)
16.8 fps ∼20% +29%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sorteer op waarde)
Sharp D10
14 fps ∼24%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
13 fps ∼22% -7%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
59 fps ∼100% +321%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
55 fps ∼93% +293%
LG Q7 Plus
6.8 fps ∼12% -51%
Sharp Aquos C10
14 fps ∼24% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (13 - 15, n=12)
14 fps ∼24% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (4.1 - 115, n=490)
16 fps ∼27% +14%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Sharp D10
9.8 fps ∼16%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
9.8 fps ∼16% 0%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
60 fps ∼100% +512%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
59 fps ∼98% +502%
LG Q7 Plus
4.7 fps ∼8% -52%
Sharp Aquos C10
10 fps ∼17% +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (5.2 - 10, n=12)
9.38 fps ∼16% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 88, n=349)
14.3 fps ∼24% +46%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Sharp D10
9.6 fps ∼18%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
9.3 fps ∼18% -3%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
53 fps ∼100% +452%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
51 fps ∼96% +431%
LG Q7 Plus
4.5 fps ∼8% -53%
Sharp Aquos C10
9.8 fps ∼18% +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (5.3 - 11, n=12)
9.49 fps ∼18% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (9.8 - 110, n=352)
13.9 fps ∼26% +45%
GFXBench
High Tier Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Sharp D10
3.2 fps ∼31%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
3.1 fps ∼30% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (3.1 - 3.2, n=3)
3.13 fps ∼31% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (3.6 - 59, n=62)
10.2 fps ∼100% +219%
2560x1440 High Tier Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Sharp D10
1.9 fps ∼29%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
1.9 fps ∼29% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (1.8 - 1.9, n=3)
1.867 fps ∼29% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (2.2 - 31, n=62)
6.49 fps ∼100% +242%
Normal Tier Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Sharp D10
5.4 fps ∼38%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
5.4 fps ∼38% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (5 - 5.4, n=3)
5.27 fps ∼37% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (5.7 - 59, n=62)
14.4 fps ∼100% +167%
1920x1080 Normal Tier Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Sharp D10
5.6 fps ∼36%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
5.6 fps ∼36% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (5 - 5.6, n=3)
5.4 fps ∼34% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (6 - 63, n=61)
15.7 fps ∼100% +180%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Sharp D10
5.5 fps ∼16%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
5.6 fps ∼16% +2%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
35 fps ∼100% +536%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
35 fps ∼100% +536%
LG Q7 Plus
2.5 fps ∼7% -55%
Sharp Aquos C10
5.6 fps ∼16% +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (5.3 - 5.6, n=12)
5.5 fps ∼16% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (6.3 - 54, n=280)
9.86 fps ∼28% +79%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Sharp D10
5.4 fps ∼17%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
5.3 fps ∼17% -2%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
31 fps ∼100% +474%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
31 fps ∼100% +474%
LG Q7 Plus
2.4 fps ∼8% -56%
Sharp Aquos C10
6 fps ∼19% +11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (5.2 - 6, n=12)
5.58 fps ∼18% +3%
Average of class Smartphone (6 - 58, n=283)
8.89 fps ∼29% +65%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sorteer op waarde)
Sharp D10
90099 Points ∼33%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
89006 Points ∼33% -1%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
272546 Points ∼100% +202%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
266374 Points ∼98% +196%
LG Q7 Plus
52855 Points ∼19% -41%
Sharp Aquos C10
89351 Points ∼33% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (87300 - 90674, n=10)
89507 Points ∼33% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (17073 - 348178, n=171)
117893 Points ∼43% +31%
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sorteer op waarde)
Sharp D10
72035 Points ∼94%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
70346 Points ∼92% -2%
LG Q7 Plus
44064 Points ∼58% -39%
Sharp Aquos C10
71531 Points ∼93% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (44128 - 73617, n=12)
68642 Points ∼90% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (23275 - 254229, n=394)
76519 Points ∼100% +6%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sorteer op waarde)
Sharp D10
921 Points ∼57%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
936 Points ∼58% +2%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
1613 Points ∼100% +75%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
1606 Points ∼100% +74%
LG Q7 Plus
751 Points ∼47% -18%
Sharp Aquos C10
666 Points ∼41% -28%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (666 - 936, n=12)
863 Points ∼54% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (7 - 1731, n=500)
697 Points ∼43% -24%
Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Sharp D10
1495 Points ∼19%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
1480 Points ∼19% -1%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
7860 Points ∼100% +426%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
7777 Points ∼99% +420%
LG Q7 Plus
631 Points ∼8% -58%
Sharp Aquos C10
1502 Points ∼19% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (1470 - 1523, n=12)
1501 Points ∼19% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (18 - 15969, n=500)
1735 Points ∼22% +16%
Memory (sorteer op waarde)
Sharp D10
1235 Points ∼31%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
1334 Points ∼34% +8%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
3924 Points ∼100% +218%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
3762 Points ∼96% +205%
LG Q7 Plus
800 Points ∼20% -35%
Sharp Aquos C10
998 Points ∼25% -19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (838 - 1405, n=12)
1217 Points ∼31% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (21 - 6283, n=500)
1243 Points ∼32% +1%
System (sorteer op waarde)
Sharp D10
3298 Points ∼41%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
3284 Points ∼41% 0%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
8081 Points ∼100% +145%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
8023 Points ∼99% +143%
LG Q7 Plus
1407 Points ∼17% -57%
Sharp Aquos C10
1763 Points ∼22% -47%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (1763 - 3319, n=12)
3147 Points ∼39% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (369 - 12202, n=500)
2509 Points ∼31% -24%
Overall (sorteer op waarde)
Sharp D10
1539 Points ∼34%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
1570 Points ∼35% +2%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
4478 Points ∼100% +191%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
4406 Points ∼98% +186%
LG Q7 Plus
855 Points ∼19% -44%
Sharp Aquos C10
1152 Points ∼26% -25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (1152 - 1570, n=12)
1487 Points ∼33% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (150 - 6097, n=504)
1253 Points ∼28% -19%

Legende

 
Sharp D10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Qualcomm Adreno 508, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Qualcomm Adreno 508, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Qualcomm Adreno 630, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
LG Q7 Plus Mediatek MT6750S, ARM Mali-T860 MP2, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Sharp Aquos C10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Qualcomm Adreno 508, 64 GB eMMC Flash
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL (Chrome 68; AI Boost ON)
89.313 Points ∼100% +221%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL (Chrome 68)
88.562 Points ∼99% +218%
Average of class Smartphone (10.8 - 273, n=423)
36.7 Points ∼41% +32%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (27.4 - 30.8, n=12)
28.3 Points ∼32% +2%
Sharp Aquos C10 (Chrome 68)
28.27 Points ∼32% +2%
Sharp D10 (Chrome 70)
27.85 Points ∼31%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus (Chrome 67)
27.615 Points ∼31% -1%
LG Q7 Plus (Chrome 67)
18.694 Points ∼21% -33%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL (Chrome 68, AI Boost ON)
16728 Points ∼100% +234%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL (Chrome 68)
16635 Points ∼99% +232%
Average of class Smartphone (1506 - 43280, n=559)
5558 Points ∼33% +11%
Sharp Aquos C10 (Chrome 68)
5202 Points ∼31% +4%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus (Chrome 67)
5017 Points ∼30% 0%
Sharp D10 (Chrome 70)
5004 Points ∼30%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (4398 - 5202, n=12)
4971 Points ∼30% -1%
LG Q7 Plus (Chrome 67)
3422 Points ∼20% -32%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
LG Q7 Plus (Chrome 67)
13670.9 ms * ∼100% -39%
Average of class Smartphone (603 - 59466, n=579)
11477 ms * ∼84% -17%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus (Chrome 67)
10086 ms * ∼74% -3%
Sharp D10 (Chrome 70)
9807.1 ms * ∼72%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (8396 - 10236, n=12)
9656 ms * ∼71% +2%
Sharp Aquos C10 (Chrome 68)
9532.6 ms * ∼70% +3%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL (Chrome 68, AI Boost ON)
2277 ms * ∼17% +77%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL (Chrome 68)
2264 ms * ∼17% +77%

* ... kleiner is beter

Sharp D10Sony Xperia XA2 PlusLG Q7 PlusSharp Aquos C10Average 64 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
1%
-14%
0%
-5%
-26%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
63.6 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
67.02 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
5%
62.2 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-2%
60.7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-5%
54.3 (14.1 - 74.7, n=71)
-15%
45.8 (3.4 - 87.1, n=323)
-28%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
83.2 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
86.01 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
3%
81.45 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-2%
83 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
0%
72.6 (21.1 - 86.9, n=71)
-13%
64 (8.2 - 96.5, n=323)
-23%
Random Write 4KB
16.79
10.5
-37%
11.91
-29%
16.9
1%
19.8 (3.4 - 87.1, n=78)
18%
16.1 (0.14 - 164, n=608)
-4%
Random Read 4KB
47.2
77.43
64%
35.8
-24%
48.2
2%
50.3 (11.4 - 149, n=78)
7%
38.3 (1.59 - 173, n=608)
-19%
Sequential Write 256KB
211.5
146.16
-31%
186.55
-12%
213.4
1%
164 (40 - 246, n=78)
-22%
79.8 (2.99 - 246, n=608)
-62%
Sequential Read 256KB
280.71
281.06
0%
235.9
-16%
283.8
1%
269 (115 - 704, n=78)
-4%
230 (12.1 - 895, n=608)
-18%
Max. Belasting
 33.4 °C32.5 °C33.4 °C 
 33.7 °C32.3 °C32.9 °C 
 33.5 °C32.3 °C32.9 °C 
Maximum: 33.7 °C
Gemiddelde: 33 °C
30.2 °C31.8 °C33.4 °C
31.2 °C31.7 °C35 °C
31.2 °C31.9 °C34.6 °C
Maximum: 35 °C
Gemiddelde: 32.3 °C
Stroomadapter (max.)  39.9 °C | Kamertemperatuur 21.7 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 33 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 33.7 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 35.7 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 35 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 34.2 °C / 94 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.8 °C / 89 F, compared to the device average of 33.2 °C / 92 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2036.940.32536.538.33137.241.34037.637.35031.736.26323.826.68024.427.110023.624.312519.92816023.330.920018.438.925018.242.931515.847.740014.655.350015.557.26301358.980012.357.2100012.164.7125011.968.4160010.771.7200010.772.7250010.571.3315010.368.9400010.765.7500010.566.4630010.568.8800010.662.71000010.659.81250010.557.61600010.644.6SPL72.461.552.561.424.180.3N25.514.68.214.50.642.9median 11.9median 58.9Delta3.411.5303836.136.83233.529.427.931.536.327.924.722.121.52223.821.224.421.529.720.340.118.446.417.354.316.760.91760.616.162.915.865.615.870.415.372.115.874.514.971.91573.114.775.514.774.91572.515.173.11573.615.473.61567.116.347.727.684.7159.3median 15.8median 67.11.913.1hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSharp D10Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Sharp D10 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.4% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 38% of all tested devices in this class were better, 13% similar, 49% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 64% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 28% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Sony Xperia XA2 Plus audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 46% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 44% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 68% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 25% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Stroomgebruik
Uit / Standbydarklight 0 / 0.1 Watt
Inactiefdarkmidlight 0.7 / 1 / 1.4 Watt
Belasting midlight 3.7 / 5.2 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Sharp D10
2900 mAh
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
3580 mAh
LG Q7 Plus
3000 mAh
Sharp Aquos C10
2700 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-9%
-29%
-88%
-30%
-32%
Idle Minimum *
0.7
0.35
50%
1
-43%
0.9
-29%
0.733 (0.35 - 1.4, n=12)
-5%
0.879 (0.2 - 3.4, n=642)
-26%
Idle Average *
1
1.81
-81%
1.57
-57%
2.2
-120%
1.808 (1 - 2.31, n=12)
-81%
1.721 (0.6 - 6.2, n=641)
-72%
Idle Maximum *
1.4
1.83
-31%
1.64
-17%
3.8
-171%
2.16 (1.4 - 3.8, n=12)
-54%
1.998 (0.74 - 6.6, n=642)
-43%
Load Average *
3.7
3.31
11%
4.1
-11%
6.2
-68%
3.85 (2.82 - 6.2, n=12)
-4%
4.04 (0.8 - 10.8, n=636)
-9%
Load Maximum *
5.2
4.97
4%
6.02
-16%
8
-54%
5.64 (4.56 - 8, n=12)
-8%
5.76 (1.2 - 14.2, n=636)
-11%

* ... kleiner is beter

Batterijduur
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
10h 44min
Sharp D10
2900 mAh
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
3580 mAh
LG Q7 Plus
3000 mAh
Sharp Aquos C10
2700 mAh
Batterijduur
WiFi v1.3
644
837
30%
620
-4%
672
4%

Pro

+ lange looptijden
+ degelijke systeemprestaties
+ robuuste behuizing
+ randvrij ontwerp

Contra

- Bluetooth 4.0
- vale kleuren van de primaire camera
Getest: Sharp D10 Smartphone. Testmodel geleverd door notebooksbilliger.de.
Getest: Sharp D10 Smartphone. Testmodel geleverd door notebooksbilliger.de.

Voor het volledige, Engelse testrapport, klik hier.

De Sharp Aquos D10 is een degelijke middenklasse telefoon die een goed alternatief biedt voor apparaten van meer gevestigde fabrikanten. De D10 heeft indrukwekkende systeemprestaties, die niet worden ingeperkt door bloatware. De Snapdragon 630 SoC en 4 GB RAM maken de D10 krachtig genoeg om zelfs veeleisende moderne apps aan te kunnen. De 64 GB interne opslagruimte moet ook groot genoeg zijn voor de meeste gebruikers.

De Sharp Aquos D10 is een degelijke smartphone die alleen steken laat vallen met zijn relatief teleurstellende camera's.

Sharp adverteert de D10 als een optische zoomlens, maar dit leverde geen voordelen op tijdens onze tests. De twee achterwaarts gerichte camera's zijn goed genoeg voor snelle snapshots, maar ze konden een aparte digitale camera niet vervangen. Over het geheel genomen is de D10 een degelijk apparaat met een modern ontwerp dat wordt geplaagd door een paar kleine nadelen.

Sharp D10 - 12-11-2018 v6
Mike Wobker

Behuizing
80%
Toetsenbord
67 / 75 → 89%
Aanwijsapparaat
90%
Aansluitmogelijkheden
42 / 60 → 70%
Gewicht
91%
Batterij
93%
Beeldscherm
86%
Gaming-performance
41 / 63 → 65%
Applicatie-performance
53 / 70 → 75%
Temperatuur
92%
Luidheid
100%
Audio
54 / 91 → 59%
Camera
80%
Gemiddelde
74%
85%
Smartphone - Gewogen Gemiddelde

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Overzichten en testrapporten over laptops en mobieltjes > Testrapporten > Kort testrapport Sharp Aquos D10 Smartphone
Mike Wobker, 2018-11-16 (Update: 2018-11-16)