Notebookcheck

Kort testrapport Razer Blade Stealth (GTX 1650 Max-Q): 4K beeldscherm, batterduur & CPU prestaties stellen teleur

Benjamin Herzig, 👁 Sebastian Jentsch, Felicitas Krohn, 24-11-2019

Goedkoper beeldscherm, juiste keuze!? Razer probeert de ultieme game machine voor onderweg te maken. Het resultaat is de nieuwe Razer Blade Stealth. Deze heeft vele goede kwaliteiten, zoals een krachtige GPU, maar het 4K beeldscherm kan ons niet tevreden stellen. De CPU prestaties hadden ook beter mogen zijn.

Razer Blade Stealth 13, Core i7-1065G7 (Blade Stealth Serie)
Processor
Intel Core i7-1065G7
Grafische kaart
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q - 4096 MB, Core: 1254 MHz, Geheugen: 1751 MHz, 1F91, 436.15, Optimus (Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7)
Geheugen
16384 MB 
, LPDDR4-3744, gesoldeerd
Beeldscherm
13.3 inch 16:9, 3840 x 2160 pixel 331 PPI, 10-punts multitouch beeldscherm, AUO202B, IPS LED, glimmend: ja, HDR
Moederbord
Intel 495 (Ice Lake-U PCH-LP Premium)
Opslag
Lite-On CA3-8D512,
Geluidskaart
Intel Ice Lake-U/Y PCH-LP cAVS
Verbindingen
3 USB 3.0, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 DisplayPort, Audio Verbindingen: combo audio
Netwerkmogelijkheden
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5.0
Afmetingen
hoogte x breedte x diepte (in mm): 15.3 x 304.6 x 210
Batterij
53.1 Wh Lithium-Ion
Besturingssysteem
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: 720p met infrarood
Bijkomende functionaliteiten
Luidsprekers: quad-luidsprekersysteem, Toetsenbord: 6-rij chiclet met multikleurig backlight, Toetsenbordverlichting: ja
Gewicht
1.471 kg, Voeding: 582 g
Prijs
2199 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

EvaluatieDatumModelGewichtHoogteFormaatResolutieBest Price
84%11-2019Razer Blade Stealth 13, Core i7-1065G7
1065G7, GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
1.5 kg15.3 mm13.3"3840x2160
86%11-2019Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7
1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
1.3 kg13 mm13.4"1920x1200
88%10-2019Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL
1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
1.4 kg14.95 mm14"1920x1080
86%10-2019Razer Blade Stealth i7-1065G7 Iris Plus
1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
1.4 kg15.3 mm13.3"1920x1080

Size and weight comparison

320.3 mm 215.6 mm 14.95 mm 1.4 kg304.6 mm 210 mm 15.3 mm 1.5 kg296 mm 207 mm 13 mm 1.3 kg
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2019 i5 4TB3
Broadcom 802.11ac
730 MBit/s ∼100% +4%
Razer Blade Stealth 13, Core i7-1065G7
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
703 (min: 641, max: 729) MBit/s ∼96%
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)
674 MBit/s ∼92% -4%
Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7
Intel Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650s
640 MBit/s ∼88% -9%
Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
635 MBit/s ∼87% -10%
Apple MacBook Air 2018
Broadcom 802.11ac
570 (min: 566, max: 572) MBit/s ∼78% -19%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (30.9 - 950, n=127)
536 MBit/s ∼73% -24%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
743 MBit/s ∼100% +16%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2019 i5 4TB3
Broadcom 802.11ac
710 MBit/s ∼96% +11%
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)
644 MBit/s ∼87% +1%
Razer Blade Stealth 13, Core i7-1065G7
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
638 (min: 626, max: 644) MBit/s ∼86%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (36 - 949, n=127)
532 MBit/s ∼72% -17%
Apple MacBook Air 2018
Broadcom 802.11ac
461 (min: 216, max: 525) MBit/s ∼62% -28%
Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7
Intel Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650s
356 MBit/s ∼48% -44%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700710720730Tooltip
Razer Blade Stealth 13, Core i7-1065G7 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø703 (641-729)
Apple MacBook Air 2018 Broadcom 802.11ac; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10: Ø478 (462-488)
Razer Blade Stealth 13, Core i7-1065G7 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø638 (626-644)
Apple MacBook Air 2018 Broadcom 802.11ac; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø454 (216-525)
333
cd/m²
332
cd/m²
325
cd/m²
327
cd/m²
353
cd/m²
322
cd/m²
337
cd/m²
359
cd/m²
331
cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling
AUO202B
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 359 cd/m² Gemiddelde: 335.4 cd/m² Minimum: 7.5 cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling: 90 %
Helderheid in Batterij-modus: 353 cd/m²
Contrast: 1412:1 (Zwart: 0.25 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.4 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6, calibrated: 1.1
ΔE Greyscale 5.49 | 0.64-98 Ø6.2
96% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 61% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.26
Razer Blade Stealth 13, Core i7-1065G7
AUO202B, IPS LED, 3840x2160, 13.3
Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7
Sharp LQ134N1, IPS, 1920x1200, 13.4
Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL
LP140WF9-SPE2, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 14
Razer Blade Stealth i7-1065G7 Iris Plus
Sharp LQ133M1JW41, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3
Response Times
24%
22%
21%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
62 (30, 32)
47.6 (23.2, 24.4)
23%
49.6 (23.6, 26)
20%
45.2 (22.4, 22.8)
27%
Response Time Black / White *
39 (24, 15)
29.2 (16, 13.2)
25%
30 (16.4, 13.6)
23%
33.2 (17.6, 15.6)
15%
PWM Frequency
2500 (25)
22730 (24)
Screen
17%
17%
20%
Brightness middle
353
549.8
56%
384
9%
422.6
20%
Brightness
335
520
55%
363
8%
404
21%
Brightness Distribution
90
86
-4%
90
0%
87
-3%
Black Level *
0.25
0.39
-56%
0.17
32%
0.35
-40%
Contrast
1412
1410
0%
2259
60%
1207
-15%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.4
2.12
52%
3.5
20%
1.02
77%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
7.21
3.66
49%
5.5
24%
3.06
58%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
1.1
1.37
-25%
1
9%
0.95
14%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
5.49
2.6
53%
4.6
16%
1
82%
Gamma
2.26 97%
2.3 96%
2.32 95%
2.21 100%
CCT
7689 85%
6884 94%
6884 94%
6502 100%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
61
65.4
7%
62
2%
62.1
2%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
96
99.7
4%
97.7
2%
97.1
1%
Totaal Gemiddelde (Programma / Instellingen)
21% / 18%
20% / 17%
21% / 20%

* ... kleiner is beter

Responstijd Scherm

De responstijden van het scherm tonen hoe snel het scherm in staat is om van één kleur naar de andere te veranderen. Trage responstijden kunnen aanleiding geven tot 'nabeelden' rond bewegende objecten of het scherm wazig maken (blur). Vooral spelers van snelle 3D-games hebben baat bij een scherm met snelle responstijden.
       Responstijd Zwart naar Wit
39 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd↗ 24 ms stijging
↘ 15 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde trage responstijden in onze tests en is misschien te traag voor games.
Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.8 (minimum) tot 240 (maximum) ms. » 96 % van alle toestellen zijn beter.
Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd slechter is dan het gemiddelde (24.8 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.
       Responstijd 50% Grijs naar 80% Grijs
62 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd↗ 30 ms stijging
↘ 32 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde trage responstijden in onze tests en is misschien te traag voor games.
Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.9 (minimum) tot 636 (maximum) ms. » 96 % van alle toestellen zijn beter.
Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd slechter is dan het gemiddelde (39.4 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Om de schermhelderheid te verlagen schakelen sommige laptops het backlight erg snel aan en uit. Dit gebeurt aan een dergelijk hoge frequentie dat het niet zichtbaar is voor het menselijk oog. Als de frequentie te laag is kunnen personen met gevoelige ogen geïrriteerd geraken, hoofdpijn krijgen en zelfs flickering waarnemen.
Screen flickering / PWM niet waargenomen

Ter vergelijking: 51 % van alle geteste toestellen maakten geen gebruik van PWM om de schermhelderheid te verlagen. Als het wel werd gebruikt, werd een gemiddelde van 9364 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz waargenomen.

0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700710720730740750760770780790800810820830840Tooltip
Razer Blade Stealth 13, Core i7-1065G7 Intel Core i7-1065G7, Intel Core i7-1065G7: Ø483 (464-551)
Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7 Intel Core i7-1065G7, Intel Core i7-1065G7: Ø672 (632.81-836.68)
Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL Intel Core i7-1065G7, Intel Core i7-1065G7; Performance Mode: Ø702 (693.71-740.11)
Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL Intel Core i7-1065G7, Intel Core i7-1065G7: Ø672 (659-720)
Razer Blade Stealth i7-1065G7 Iris Plus Intel Core i7-1065G7, Intel Core i7-1065G7: Ø671 (663.4-722.7)
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL
Intel Core i7-1065G7
179 Points ∼100% +5%
Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7
Intel Core i7-1065G7
174 Points ∼97% +2%
Average Intel Core i7-1065G7
  (149 - 183, n=6)
172 Points ∼96% +1%
Razer Blade Stealth 13, Core i7-1065G7
Intel Core i7-1065G7
171 Points ∼96%
Razer Blade Stealth i7-1065G7 Iris Plus
Intel Core i7-1065G7
149 Points ∼83% -13%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (20 - 185, n=280)
117 Points ∼65% -32%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7
Intel Core i7-1065G7
830 Points ∼100% +51%
Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL
Intel Core i7-1065G7
740 (min: 693, max: 740) Points ∼89% +34%
Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL
Intel Core i7-1065G7
720 (min: 659, max: 720) Points ∼87% +31%
Average Intel Core i7-1065G7
  (521 - 830, n=7)
684 Points ∼82% +24%
Razer Blade Stealth i7-1065G7 Iris Plus
Intel Core i7-1065G7
676 Points ∼81% +23%
Razer Blade Stealth 13, Core i7-1065G7
Intel Core i7-1065G7
551 (min: 464, max: 551) Points ∼66%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (32 - 1051, n=290)
345 Points ∼42% -37%
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
551 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
171 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
96.69 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Help
PCMark 10
Digital Content Creation
Razer Blade Stealth 13, Core i7-1065G7
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, 1065G7, Lite-On CA3-8D512
4338 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i7-1065G7, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
 
4338 Points ∼100% 0%
Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), 1065G7, Toshiba BG4 KBG40ZPZ512G
3998 Points ∼92% -8%
Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), 1065G7, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
3900 Points ∼90% -10%
Razer Blade Stealth i7-1065G7 Iris Plus
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), 1065G7, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
3796 Points ∼88% -12%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (534 - 4338, n=95)
2504 Points ∼58% -42%
Productivity
Razer Blade Stealth i7-1065G7 Iris Plus
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), 1065G7, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
7245 Points ∼100% +8%
Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), 1065G7, Toshiba BG4 KBG40ZPZ512G
7179 Points ∼99% +7%
Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), 1065G7, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
6924 Points ∼96% +3%
Razer Blade Stealth 13, Core i7-1065G7
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, 1065G7, Lite-On CA3-8D512
6739 Points ∼93%
Average Intel Core i7-1065G7, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
 
6739 Points ∼93% 0%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (1014 - 7281, n=95)
5268 Points ∼73% -22%
Essentials
Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), 1065G7, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
9678 Points ∼100% +16%
Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), 1065G7, Toshiba BG4 KBG40ZPZ512G
9678 Points ∼100% +16%
Razer Blade Stealth i7-1065G7 Iris Plus
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), 1065G7, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
9664 Points ∼100% +15%
Razer Blade Stealth 13, Core i7-1065G7
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, 1065G7, Lite-On CA3-8D512
8373 Points ∼87%
Average Intel Core i7-1065G7, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
 
8373 Points ∼87% 0%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (2062 - 9664, n=95)
6875 Points ∼71% -18%
Score
Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), 1065G7, Toshiba BG4 KBG40ZPZ512G
4677 Points ∼100% +4%
Razer Blade Stealth i7-1065G7 Iris Plus
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), 1065G7, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
4609 Points ∼99% +3%
Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), 1065G7, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
4583 Points ∼98% +2%
Razer Blade Stealth 13, Core i7-1065G7
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, 1065G7, Lite-On CA3-8D512
4484 Points ∼96%
Average Intel Core i7-1065G7, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
 
4484 Points ∼96% 0%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (743 - 4609, n=98)
3186 Points ∼68% -29%
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Razer Blade Stealth i7-1065G7 Iris Plus
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), 1065G7, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
5173 Points ∼100% +26%
Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), 1065G7, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
5158 Points ∼100% +26%
Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), 1065G7, Toshiba BG4 KBG40ZPZ512G
5086 Points ∼98% +24%
Razer Blade Stealth 13, Core i7-1065G7
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, 1065G7, Lite-On CA3-8D512
4099 Points ∼79%
Average Intel Core i7-1065G7, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
 
4099 Points ∼79% 0%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (1283 - 5363, n=220)
4063 Points ∼79% -1%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Razer Blade Stealth i7-1065G7 Iris Plus
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), 1065G7, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
4030 Points ∼100% +33%
Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), 1065G7, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
4003 Points ∼99% +32%
Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), 1065G7, Toshiba BG4 KBG40ZPZ512G
3982 Points ∼99% +31%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (1027 - 4211, n=248)
3044 Points ∼76% 0%
Razer Blade Stealth 13, Core i7-1065G7
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, 1065G7, Lite-On CA3-8D512
3029 Points ∼75%
Average Intel Core i7-1065G7, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
 
3029 Points ∼75% 0%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
3029 punten
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
4099 punten
Help
Razer Blade Stealth 13, Core i7-1065G7
Lite-On CA3-8D512
Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7
Toshiba BG4 KBG40ZPZ512G
Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
Razer Blade Stealth i7-1065G7 Iris Plus
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
Average Lite-On CA3-8D512
 
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
-22%
1%
-10%
0%
Write 4K
153
106.7
-30%
128.4
-16%
176.8
16%
153
0%
Read 4K
59.52
49.94
-16%
46.37
-22%
48.38
-19%
59.5
0%
Write Seq
1608
1223
-24%
1863
16%
1332
-17%
1608
0%
Read Seq
2293
1801
-21%
2340
2%
1644
-28%
2293
0%
Write 4K Q32T1
497
325.3
-35%
451.1
-9%
440.6
-11%
497
0%
Read 4K Q32T1
543.6
550.5
1%
415.3
-24%
559.2
3%
544
0%
Write Seq Q32T1
1640
1224
-25%
2985
82%
1104
-33%
1640
0%
Read Seq Q32T1
3158
2350
-26%
2565
-19%
3481
10%
3158
0%
Lite-On CA3-8D512
Sequential Read: 2130 MB/s
Sequential Write: 534.5 MB/s
512K Read: 1631 MB/s
512K Write: 1153 MB/s
4K Read: 58.83 MB/s
4K Write: 157.3 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 556 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 486.9 MB/s
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), Intel Core i9-9980HK
12388 Points ∼100% +16%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
  (10422 - 11764, n=7)
11095 Points ∼90% +4%
Razer Blade Stealth 13, Core i7-1065G7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-1065G7
10699 Points ∼86%
Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL
Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), Intel Core i7-1065G7
4613 Points ∼37% -57%
Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7
Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), Intel Core i7-1065G7
4594 Points ∼37% -57%
Razer Blade Stealth i7-1065G7 Iris Plus
Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), Intel Core i7-1065G7
4252 Points ∼34% -60%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (230 - 10699, n=368)
1319 Points ∼11% -88%
3DMark - 2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), Intel Core i9-9980HK
3353 Points ∼100% +18%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
  (2836 - 3060, n=6)
2953 Points ∼88% +4%
Razer Blade Stealth 13, Core i7-1065G7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-1065G7
2840 Points ∼85%
Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL
Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), Intel Core i7-1065G7
835 Points ∼25% -71%
Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7
Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), Intel Core i7-1065G7
833 Points ∼25% -71%
Razer Blade Stealth i7-1065G7 Iris Plus
Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), Intel Core i7-1065G7
792 Points ∼24% -72%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (85 - 2840, n=42)
553 Points ∼16% -81%
3DMark 11 Performance
9381 punten
3DMark Time Spy Score
2859 punten
Help
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650
Intel Core i9-9980HK, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
64.8 fps ∼100% +40%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
  (46.3 - 54.8, n=5)
50.7 fps ∼78% +10%
Razer Blade Stealth 13, Core i7-1065G7
Intel Core i7-1065G7, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
46.3 fps ∼71%
Razer Blade Stealth i7-1065G7 Iris Plus
Intel Core i7-1065G7, Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
19.1 fps ∼29% -59%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (3.8 - 46.3, n=27)
14.2 fps ∼22% -69%
05101520253035Tooltip
Razer Blade Stealth 13, Core i7-1065G7 GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, 1065G7, Lite-On CA3-8D512: Ø28.1 (25-30)
lage gem. hoge ultra4K
BioShock Infinite (2013) 230.7 186.6 169.3 70.3 fps
The Witcher 3 (2015) 137.5 84.9 46.3 27.5 17.5 fps
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 134.6 93 50.9 41.7 18.3 fps

Geluidsniveau

Onbelast
30 / 30 / 30 dB (A)
Belasting
33.9 / 38.1 dB (A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
stil
40 dB(A)
hoorbaar
50 dB(A)
luid
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm afstand)   environment noise: 30 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2035.934.53332.835.92536.635.534.934.836.63138.834.838.138.738.84034.933.931.634.234.95038.135.632.536.738.16332.232.631.830.532.28027.426.726.625.527.410025.526.825.924.925.512524.925.125.523.724.916023.623.823.623.423.620023.223.322.622.523.225024.522.621.421.524.531524.522.22120.724.540023.221.319.819.923.250022.320.719.719.122.363021.92018.919.221.98002320.917.818.123100025.321.417.617.825.3125024.421.617.317.224.4160027.823.817.51727.820002923.817.317.329250030.524.817.517.430.5315029.723.117.317.429.7400023.82017.617.723.850002118.717.717.721630019.918.317.917.919.9800018.718.117.917.918.71000018.218.217.917.918.21250017.91817.817.817.91600017.917.917.817.817.9SPL38.233.930.130.138.2N2.61.91.41.42.6median 23.6median 21.4median 17.9median 17.9median 23.6Delta1.82.31.41.41.8hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseRazer Blade Stealth 13, Core i7-1065G7
Max. Belasting
 44.1 °C46.9 °C38.9 °C 
 39.1 °C42.1 °C37.9 °C 
 35.3 °C32.6 °C34.7 °C 
Maximum: 46.9 °C
Gemiddelde: 39.1 °C
38.7 °C46.3 °C38.7 °C
36.8 °C43.4 °C41.2 °C
34.8 °C38.6 °C37.2 °C
Maximum: 46.3 °C
Gemiddelde: 39.5 °C
Stroomadapter (max.)  51.5 °C | Kamertemperatuur 23.1 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 39.1 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 30.7 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Subnotebook.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46.9 °C / 116 F, compared to the average of 35.8 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22 to 57 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 46.3 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 40 °C / 104 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 32 °C / 90 F, compared to the device average of 30.7 °C / 87 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 35.7 °C / 96 F, compared to the device average of 30.7 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (35.3 °C / 95.5 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.6 °C / 83.5 F (-6.7 °C / -12 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2035.232.835.22535.434.835.43136.538.736.54033.134.233.15031.736.731.76329.130.529.18030.525.530.510036.224.936.212543.323.743.316044.723.444.72004122.54125050.421.550.431557.220.757.240064.719.964.750064.619.164.663068.519.268.580065.718.165.710006717.867125063.517.263.51600671767200065.817.365.825006217.462315063.817.463.8400059.417.759.4500059.617.759.6630060.917.960.980005917.959100005817.9581250057.417.857.41600055.317.855.3SPL7630.176N38.11.438.1median 59.6median 17.9median 59.6Delta6.61.46.64144.438.239.33838.136.238.936.837.338.537.236.336.934.945.933.453.533.359.832.361.331.661.530.665.429.96629.663.229.269.728.873.228.27427.670.227.569.827.670.227.265.72756.72761.32762.526.966.426.867.126.87126.66626.761.439.980.73.851.2median 27.6median 65.723.133.733.526.126.628.831.629.829.924.630.222.440.121.841.82351.12353.52258.822.963.322.767.120.56920.370.919.168.518.869.11868.518.164.817.36616.966.216.663.416.464.916.162.816.162.516561652.315.947.515.746.815.546.815.341.829.376.81.240.5median 17.3median 63.327.1hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseRazer Blade Stealth 13, Core i7-1065G7Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Razer Blade Stealth 13, Core i7-1065G7 audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (68.49 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 28% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 63% worse
» The best had a delta of 8%, average was 20%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 18% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 78% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.74 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 7.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (10.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 7% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 91% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | reduced highs - on average 7.6% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 10% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 15% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 81% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Stroomgebruik
Uit / Standbydarklight 0.6 / 0.7 Watt
Inactiefdarkmidlight 10.7 / 13.6 / 15.7 Watt
Belasting midlight 60 / 71 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Razer Blade Stealth 13, Core i7-1065G7
1065G7, GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, Lite-On CA3-8D512, IPS LED, 3840x2160, 13.3
Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7
1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), Toshiba BG4 KBG40ZPZ512G, IPS, 1920x1200, 13.4
Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL
1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 14
Razer Blade Stealth i7-1065G7 Iris Plus
1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
 
Average of class Subnotebook
 
Power Consumption
47%
39%
34%
1%
35%
Idle Minimum *
10.7
2.6
76%
3.2
70%
5.9
45%
6.4 (4.2 - 10.7, n=5)
40%
6.62 (1 - 36, n=604)
38%
Idle Average *
13.6
5.3
61%
7
49%
8.1
40%
11.2 (7.8 - 13.6, n=5)
18%
9.82 (2.06 - 39, n=604)
28%
Idle Maximum *
15.7
7
55%
8.9
43%
11.2
29%
16.2 (10.2 - 24, n=5)
-3%
12.1 (3.9 - 55, n=604)
23%
Load Average *
60
43.1
28%
47.6
21%
44.3
26%
70.9 (60 - 76, n=5)
-18%
33.5 (6.3 - 75, n=594)
44%
Load Maximum *
71
49
31%
63.1
11%
50.2
29%
93.9 (71 - 114, n=5)
-32%
40.7 (7.6 - 111, n=597)
43%
Witcher 3 ultra *
64
43.1
33%
41.9
35%

* ... kleiner is beter

Batterijduur
Inactief (zonder WLAN, minimale helderheid)
8h 20min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3 (Edge)
5h 29min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3 max Brightness (Edge)
4h 34min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
6h 16min
Belast (maximale helderheid)
1h 54min
Razer Blade Stealth 13, Core i7-1065G7
1065G7, GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, 53.1 Wh
Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7
1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), 51 Wh
Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL
1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), 60 Wh
Razer Blade Stealth i7-1065G7 Iris Plus
1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), 53.1 Wh
Average of class Subnotebook
 
Batterijduur
63%
53%
77%
25%
Reader / Idle
500
622 (87 - 2557, n=552)
24%
H.264
376
793
111%
475 (182 - 1174, n=116)
26%
WiFi v1.3
329
537
63%
636
93%
583
77%
475 (206 - 806, n=222)
44%
Load
114
64
-44%
122 (40 - 347, n=560)
7%

Pro

+ premium aluminum behuizing
+ erg goed touchpad
+ krachtige GPU prestaties met compact design
+ goede luidsprekers
+ ventilatoren blijven meeste tijd stil

Contra

- CPU prestaties beperkt wanneer GPU belast wordt
- algeheel teleurstellend 4K UHD beeldscherm
- slechte batterijduur
- slecht een jaar garantie op een premiun notebook
in review: Razer Blade Stealth. Test sample provided by Razer.
in review: Razer Blade Stealth. Test sample provided by Razer.

Dit is de verkorte versie van het originele artikel. Het volledige, Engelse testrapport vind je hier.

De Razer Blade Stealth slaagt erin om een balans te vinden: de notebook is niet alleen ultra-compact maar ook erg krachtig. Dit geldt echter wel alleen voor GPU prestaties. We zijn namelijk niet tevreden met de CPU prestaties van het model met de NVIDIA GTX 1650 Max-Q.

Natuurlijk was het limiteren van CPU prestaties een bewuste keuze van Razer. Het limiet van 15 W is er om de temperatuur en geluid tot een minimum te houden, waar Razer wel degelijk in slaagt. Toch is het onbegrijpbaar dat de CPU zelfs vergrendeld is tot 15 W terwijl de GPU inactief is.

Nog een groot verschil van dit model vergeleken met de iGPU Razer Blade Stealth is het 4K UHD beeldscherm. Helaas is de kwaliteit van het beeldscherm teleurstellend. Het is geen slecht paneel, maar vergeleken met het FHD paneel van de iGPU Razer Blade biedt hij geen voordelen op de hoge resolutie na. Op sommige vlakken is het FHD scherm zelfs beter: het goedkopere FHD scherm is merkbaar helderder dan het 4K paneel. De hoge resolutie is gelijk ook een nadeel aangezien het 4K model veel meer stroom consumeert. Dit resulteert in een armoedige accuduur, wat vrij slecht is voor een kleine notebook. Tot slot moeten we klagen over de korte garantie van 1 jaar.

Ondanks de premium specificaties is dit specifieke model van de Razer Blade Stealth niet aan te raden. De grootste reden hiervan is het teleurstellende 4K beeldscherm.

Dit is waarom we de 4K variant van de Razer Blade Stealth 13 niet kunnen aanraden. In plaats daarvan zouden geïnteresseerde consumenten het FHD model met de GeForce GTX GPU moeten bekijken. Deze variant is goedkoper en combineert de voordelen van de Razer Blade Stealth met de prestaties van een aparte GPU. Met een lager resolutie zou batterijduur ook beter moeten zijn.

Razer Blade Stealth 13, Core i7-1065G7 - 11-11-2019 v7
Benjamin Herzig

Behuizing
89 / 98 → 90%
Toetsenbord
75%
Aanwijsapparaat
88%
Aansluitmogelijkheden
58 / 75 → 77%
Gewicht
69 / 20-75 → 90%
Batterij
66%
Beeldscherm
83%
Gaming-performance
77 / 78 → 99%
Applicatie-performance
80 / 85 → 95%
Temperatuur
86%
Luidheid
96%
Audio
59 / 91 → 65%
Camera
37 / 85 → 44%
Gemiddelde
74%
84%
Subnotebook - Gewogen Gemiddelde

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Overzichten en testrapporten over laptops en mobieltjes > Testrapporten > Kort testrapport Razer Blade Stealth (GTX 1650 Max-Q): 4K beeldscherm, batterduur & CPU prestaties stellen teleur
Benjamin Herzig, 2019-11-24 (Update: 2019-11-25)