Notebookcheck

Kort testrapport Nokia 5.1 Smartphone

Florian Schaar, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (vertaald door Siemon Boes), 21-11-2018

Instaptoestel van korte adem. Met de Nokia 5 richt de Finse fabrikant zich vooral op minder veeleisende smartphonegebruikers. Zoals gewoonlijk is het design van Nokia subtiel en elegant. De specificaties zijn eerder bescheiden, waardoor de winkelprijs van 200 euro niet bepaald goedkoop is.

Nokia 5.1 (5 Serie)
Processor
Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755
Grafische kaart
ARM Mali-T860 MP2
Geheugen
2048 MB 
, 16
Beeldscherm
5.5 inch 2:1, 2160 x 1080 pixel 439 PPI, capacitief, IPS, Corning Gorilla Glass, glimmend: ja
Opslag
16 GB eMMC Flash, 16 GB 
, 9 GB beschikbaar
Verbindingen
1 USB 2.0, Audio Verbindingen: 3.5 mm, Card Reader: microSD 256GB, 1 Vingerafdruklezer, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensoren: Accelerometer, gyroscoop, afstandssensor, kompas, vingerafdruklezer, microUSB
Netwerkmogelijkheden
802.11a/b/g/n (a/b/g/n), Bluetooth 4.2, GSM, HSPA, LTE, B1, B2, B3,B4, B5, B7, B8, B12, B13, B20, B28, B38, B40, B66; 3G: B1, B2, B4, B5, B8; G2: B2, B3, B5, B8, Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Afmetingen
hoogte x breedte x diepte (in mm): 8.2 x 151.1 x 70.7
Batterij
2970 mAh Lithium-Ion
Besturingssysteem
Android 8.0 Oreo
Camera
Primary Camera: 16 MPix
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix
Bijkomende functionaliteiten
Luidsprekers: Mono-luidspreker, Toetsenbord: Virtueel, Toetsenbordverlichting: ja, Android One, 24 Maanden Garantie, SAR-waarde hoofd (EU): 0,29 W/kg SAR-waarde lichaam (EU): 1,8 W/kg, fanless
Gewicht
151 g, Voeding: 59 g
Prijs
189 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Formaat Vergelijking

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 939, n=302)
210 MBit/s ∼100% +89%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus
Adreno 506, 625, 32 GB eMMC Flash
121 MBit/s ∼58% +9%
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
Adreno 506, 625, 64 GB eMMC Flash
117 MBit/s ∼56% +5%
Nokia 5.1
Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755, 16 GB eMMC Flash
111 (min: 98, max: 119) MBit/s ∼53%
Huawei Y7 2018
Adreno 505, 430, 16 GB eMMC Flash
55 MBit/s ∼26% -50%
Samsung Galaxy J6 2018
Mali-T830 MP1, 7870 Octa, 32 GB eMMC Flash
43.8 MBit/s ∼21% -61%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 703, n=302)
205 MBit/s ∼100% +85%
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
Adreno 506, 625, 64 GB eMMC Flash
119 MBit/s ∼58% +7%
Nokia 5.1
Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755, 16 GB eMMC Flash
111 (min: 87, max: 129) MBit/s ∼54%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus
Adreno 506, 625, 32 GB eMMC Flash
108 MBit/s ∼53% -3%
Huawei Y7 2018
Adreno 505, 430, 16 GB eMMC Flash
56.9 MBit/s ∼28% -49%
Samsung Galaxy J6 2018
Mali-T830 MP1, 7870 Octa, 32 GB eMMC Flash
44.3 MBit/s ∼22% -60%
0102030405060708090100110120130Tooltip
Nokia 5.1 Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755, ARM Mali-T860 MP2; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø110 (98-119)
Nokia 5.1 Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755, ARM Mali-T860 MP2; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø111 (87-129)
Testroute Nokia 5.1
Testroute Nokia 5.1
Testroute Nokia 5.1
Testroute Nokia 5.1
Testroute Nokia 5.1
Testroute Nokia 5.1
Testroute Garmin Edge 500
Testroute Garmin Edge 500
Testroute Garmin Edge 500
Testroute Garmin Edge 500
Testroute Garmin Edge 500
Testroute Garmin Edge 500
Hoofdcamera
Hoofdcamera
Hoofdcamera
Hoofdcamera
Frontcamera
Frontcamera

Beeldvergelijking

Bekijk een scène en navigeer binnen het eerste beeld. Eén klik wijzigt het zoomniveau. Eén klik op het ingezoomde beeld opent het origineel in een nieuw venster. Het eerste beeld toont de verschaalde foto van het testtoestel.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
klik om beelden te laden
Testbeeld
Testbeeld
Vergroting
Kleurvergelijking
Smart Lock menu
Smart Lock menu
10-punt-touchscreen
10-punt-touchscreen
469
cd/m²
437
cd/m²
419
cd/m²
471
cd/m²
447
cd/m²
433
cd/m²
478
cd/m²
451
cd/m²
452
cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 478 cd/m² Gemiddelde: 450.8 cd/m² Minimum: 15.62 cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling: 88 %
Helderheid in Batterij-modus: 447 cd/m²
Contrast: 2794:1 (Zwart: 0.16 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.5 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.2
ΔE Greyscale 4.5 | 0.64-98 Ø6.5
97.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.31
Nokia 5.1
IPS, 2160x1080, 5.5
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
LCD IPS, 2280x1080, 5.84
Motorola Moto G5s Plus
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5
Huawei Y7 2018
IPS, 1440x720, 5.99
Samsung Galaxy J6 2018
Super AMOLED, 1480x720, 5.6
Screen
-42%
-15%
-24%
2%
Brightness middle
447
554
24%
512
15%
393
-12%
296
-34%
Brightness
451
538
19%
500
11%
365
-19%
294
-35%
Brightness Distribution
88
91
3%
90
2%
85
-3%
93
6%
Black Level *
0.16
0.61
-281%
0.35
-119%
0.29
-81%
Contrast
2794
908
-68%
1463
-48%
1355
-52%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.5
4.86
-8%
4.6
-2%
5.28
-17%
2.8
38%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
7.9
8.46
-7%
7.6
4%
9
-14%
9.8
-24%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
4.5
5.3
-18%
3.8
16%
4.2
7%
1.9
58%
Gamma
2.31 95%
2.281 96%
2.11 104%
2.6 85%
2.09 105%
CCT
7517 86%
7770 84%
6952 93%
7086 92%
6398 102%

* ... kleiner is beter

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Om de schermhelderheid te verlagen schakelen sommige laptops het backlight erg snel aan en uit. Dit gebeurt aan een dergelijk hoge frequentie dat het niet zichtbaar is voor het menselijk oog. Als de frequentie te laag is kunnen personen met gevoelige ogen geïrriteerd geraken, hoofdpijn krijgen en zelfs flickering waarnemen.
Screen flickering / PWM waargenomen 64.94 Hz ≤ 10 % helderheid instelling

Het backlight van het scherm flikkert aan 64.94 Hz (hoogstwaarschijnlijk met PWM - Pulse-Width Modulation) aan een helderheid van 10 % en lager. Boven deze helderheid zou er geen flickering / PWM mogen optreden.

De frequentie van 64.94 Hz is erg laag en kan dus aanleiding geven tot geïrriteerde ogen en hoofdpijn bij langer gebruik.

Ter vergelijking: 52 % van alle geteste toestellen maakten geen gebruik van PWM om de schermhelderheid te verlagen. Als het wel werd gebruikt, werd een gemiddelde van 8964 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz waargenomen.

Responstijd Scherm

De responstijden van het scherm tonen hoe snel het scherm in staat is om van één kleur naar de andere te veranderen. Trage responstijden kunnen aanleiding geven tot 'nabeelden' rond bewegende objecten of het scherm wazig maken (blur). Vooral spelers van snelle 3D-games hebben baat bij een scherm met snelle responstijden.
       Responstijd Zwart naar Wit
38.8 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd↗ 19.6 ms stijging
↘ 19.2 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde trage responstijden in onze tests en is misschien te traag voor games.
Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.8 (minimum) tot 240 (maximum) ms. » 95 % van alle toestellen zijn beter.
Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd slechter is dan het gemiddelde (25.6 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.
       Responstijd 50% Grijs naar 80% Grijs
57.6 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd↗ 28.4 ms stijging
↘ 29.2 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde trage responstijden in onze tests en is misschien te traag voor games.
Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.9 (minimum) tot 636 (maximum) ms. » 94 % van alle toestellen zijn beter.
Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd slechter is dan het gemiddelde (41 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.
Geekbench 4.1/4.2
Compute RenderScript Score (sorteer op waarde)
Nokia 5.1
2396 Points ∼53%
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
3644 Points ∼81% +52%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus
2628 Points ∼58% +10%
Huawei Y7 2018
2133 Points ∼47% -11%
Average Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755 (1758 - 2396, n=2)
2077 Points ∼46% -13%
Average of class Smartphone (836 - 21070, n=196)
4525 Points ∼100% +89%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sorteer op waarde)
Nokia 5.1
3225 Points ∼74%
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
4369 Points ∼100% +35%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus
4308 Points ∼99% +34%
Huawei Y7 2018
2889 Points ∼66% -10%
Samsung Galaxy J6 2018
3709 Points ∼85% +15%
Average Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755 (2628 - 3225, n=2)
2927 Points ∼67% -9%
Average of class Smartphone (883 - 11598, n=246)
4306 Points ∼99% +34%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sorteer op waarde)
Nokia 5.1
825 Points ∼65%
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
880 Points ∼69% +7%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus
841 Points ∼66% +2%
Huawei Y7 2018
676 Points ∼53% -18%
Samsung Galaxy J6 2018
732 Points ∼58% -11%
Average Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755 (616 - 825, n=2)
721 Points ∼57% -13%
Average of class Smartphone (394 - 4824, n=247)
1269 Points ∼100% +54%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sorteer op waarde)
Nokia 5.1
3350 Points ∼67%
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
4828 Points ∼96% +44%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus
5035 Points ∼100% +50%
Huawei Y7 2018
3874 Points ∼77% +16%
Samsung Galaxy J6 2018
3833 Points ∼76% +14%
Average Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755 (3278 - 3405, n=3)
3344 Points ∼66% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (3146 - 9868, n=254)
4550 Points ∼90% +36%
Work performance score (sorteer op waarde)
Nokia 5.1
4234 Points ∼74%
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
5716 Points ∼100% +35%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus
5656 Points ∼99% +34%
Huawei Y7 2018
4918 Points ∼86% +16%
Samsung Galaxy J6 2018
4731 Points ∼83% +12%
Average Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755 (3069 - 4685, n=12)
4043 Points ∼71% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (6412 - 13531, n=422)
4954 Points ∼87% +17%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Nokia 5.1
1278 Points ∼64%
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
1999 Points ∼100% +56%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus
1976 Points ∼99% +55%
Huawei Y7 2018
1331 Points ∼67% +4%
Samsung Galaxy J6 2018
1595 Points ∼80% +25%
Average Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755 (1131 - 1558, n=11)
1258 Points ∼63% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (2386 - 4439, n=276)
1707 Points ∼85% +34%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Nokia 5.1
406 Points ∼28%
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
442 Points ∼30% +9%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus
420 Points ∼29% +3%
Huawei Y7 2018
306 Points ∼21% -25%
Samsung Galaxy J6 2018
236 Points ∼16% -42%
Average Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755 (272 - 406, n=11)
350 Points ∼24% -14%
Average of class Smartphone (869 - 8206, n=276)
1467 Points ∼100% +261%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sorteer op waarde)
Nokia 5.1
479 Points ∼35%
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
535 Points ∼39% +12%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus
509 Points ∼37% +6%
Huawei Y7 2018
369 Points ∼27% -23%
Samsung Galaxy J6 2018
291 Points ∼21% -39%
Average Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755 (328 - 479, n=11)
417 Points ∼31% -13%
Average of class Smartphone (1012 - 5189, n=279)
1361 Points ∼100% +184%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Nokia 5.1
1248 Points ∼62%
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
2023 Points ∼100% +62%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus
1987 Points ∼98% +59%
Huawei Y7 2018
1306 Points ∼65% +5%
Samsung Galaxy J6 2018
1631 Points ∼81% +31%
Average Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755 (1119 - 1530, n=8)
1247 Points ∼62% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (375 - 4493, n=291)
1687 Points ∼83% +35%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Nokia 5.1
572 Points ∼28%
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
784 Points ∼38% +37%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus
734 Points ∼35% +28%
Huawei Y7 2018
531 Points ∼26% -7%
Samsung Galaxy J6 2018
385 Points ∼19% -33%
Average Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755 (477 - 579, n=8)
528 Points ∼25% -8%
Average of class Smartphone (131 - 14951, n=291)
2071 Points ∼100% +262%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sorteer op waarde)
Nokia 5.1
650 Points ∼37%
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
885 Points ∼51% +36%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus
854 Points ∼49% +31%
Huawei Y7 2018
612 Points ∼35% -6%
Samsung Galaxy J6 2018
464 Points ∼27% -29%
Average Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755 (550 - 672, n=8)
606 Points ∼35% -7%
Average of class Smartphone (159 - 7856, n=292)
1734 Points ∼100% +167%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Nokia 5.1
1379 Points ∼66%
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
2104 Points ∼100% +53%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus
2021 Points ∼96% +47%
Huawei Y7 2018
1258 Points ∼60% -9%
Samsung Galaxy J6 2018
1735 Points ∼82% +26%
Average Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755 (1100 - 1498, n=13)
1244 Points ∼59% -10%
Average of class Smartphone (2281 - 4216, n=351)
1640 Points ∼78% +19%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Nokia 5.1
225 Points ∼19%
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
392 Points ∼33% +74%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus
379 Points ∼32% +68%
Huawei Y7 2018
255 Points ∼21% +13%
Samsung Galaxy J6 2018
202 Points ∼17% -10%
Average Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755 (225 - 359, n=13)
331 Points ∼28% +47%
Average of class Smartphone (815 - 5241, n=351)
1187 Points ∼100% +428%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sorteer op waarde)
Nokia 5.1
276 Points ∼24%
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
479 Points ∼42% +74%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus
463 Points ∼41% +68%
Huawei Y7 2018
310 Points ∼27% +12%
Samsung Galaxy J6 2018
251 Points ∼22% -9%
Average Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755 (276 - 425, n=13)
399 Points ∼35% +45%
Average of class Smartphone (951 - 4734, n=359)
1134 Points ∼100% +311%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Nokia 5.1
1348 Points ∼64%
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
2098 Points ∼100% +56%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus
2016 Points ∼96% +50%
Huawei Y7 2018
1280 Points ∼61% -5%
Samsung Galaxy J6 2018
1694 Points ∼81% +26%
Average Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755 (1100 - 1516, n=11)
1238 Points ∼59% -8%
Average of class Smartphone (532 - 4215, n=383)
1538 Points ∼73% +14%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Nokia 5.1
131 Points ∼8%
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
743 Points ∼46% +467%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus
723 Points ∼44% +452%
Huawei Y7 2018
524 Points ∼32% +300%
Samsung Galaxy J6 2018
244 Points ∼15% +86%
Average Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755 (131 - 565, n=11)
477 Points ∼29% +264%
Average of class Smartphone (46 - 8312, n=383)
1632 Points ∼100% +1146%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sorteer op waarde)
Nokia 5.1
164 Points ∼12%
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
867 Points ∼63% +429%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus
843 Points ∼61% +414%
Huawei Y7 2018
603 Points ∼43% +268%
Samsung Galaxy J6 2018
301 Points ∼22% +84%
Average Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755 (164 - 657, n=11)
550 Points ∼40% +235%
Average of class Smartphone (58 - 6454, n=391)
1387 Points ∼100% +746%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Nokia 5.1
12452 Points ∼78%
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
15870 Points ∼100% +27%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus
15860 Points ∼100% +27%
Huawei Y7 2018
9153 Points ∼58% -26%
Samsung Galaxy J6 2018
12566 Points ∼79% +1%
Average Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755 (9970 - 12585, n=13)
11699 Points ∼74% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (3958 - 37475, n=538)
12873 Points ∼81% +3%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sorteer op waarde)
Nokia 5.1
11324 Points ∼63%
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
13369 Points ∼74% +18%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus
13225 Points ∼74% +17%
Huawei Y7 2018
9713 Points ∼54% -14%
Samsung Galaxy J6 2018
7007 Points ∼39% -38%
Average Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755 (8718 - 11713, n=13)
10526 Points ∼59% -7%
Average of class Smartphone (2465 - 162695, n=538)
17989 Points ∼100% +59%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sorteer op waarde)
Nokia 5.1
11557 Points ∼77%
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
13847 Points ∼92% +20%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus
13732 Points ∼91% +19%
Huawei Y7 2018
9583 Points ∼63% -17%
Samsung Galaxy J6 2018
7771 Points ∼51% -33%
Average Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755 (9279 - 11557, n=13)
10753 Points ∼71% -7%
Average of class Smartphone (2915 - 77599, n=539)
15106 Points ∼100% +31%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sorteer op waarde)
Nokia 5.1
19 fps ∼61%
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
23 fps ∼73% +21%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus
23 fps ∼73% +21%
Huawei Y7 2018
16 fps ∼51% -16%
Samsung Galaxy J6 2018
12 fps ∼38% -37%
Average Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755 (14 - 19, n=11)
17.2 fps ∼55% -9%
Average of class Smartphone (4.1 - 251, n=563)
31.3 fps ∼100% +65%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sorteer op waarde)
Nokia 5.1
17 fps ∼63%
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
21 fps ∼78% +24%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus
19 fps ∼70% +12%
Huawei Y7 2018
27 fps ∼100% +59%
Samsung Galaxy J6 2018
19 fps ∼70% +12%
Average Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755 (14 - 28, n=11)
18.8 fps ∼70% +11%
Average of class Smartphone (6.9 - 120, n=566)
24.9 fps ∼92% +46%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sorteer op waarde)
Nokia 5.1
8.22 fps ∼49%
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
9.9 fps ∼59% +20%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus
9.8 fps ∼58% +19%
Huawei Y7 2018
7.1 fps ∼42% -14%
Samsung Galaxy J6 2018
5.4 fps ∼32% -34%
Average Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755 (4.7 - 8.22, n=11)
6.83 fps ∼41% -17%
Average of class Smartphone (2.2 - 132, n=485)
16.8 fps ∼100% +104%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sorteer op waarde)
Nokia 5.1
7.7 fps ∼48%
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
9.4 fps ∼59% +22%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus
10 fps ∼63% +30%
Huawei Y7 2018
14 fps ∼88% +82%
Samsung Galaxy J6 2018
10 fps ∼63% +30%
Average Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755 (4.7 - 15, n=11)
8.18 fps ∼51% +6%
Average of class Smartphone (4.1 - 115, n=488)
16 fps ∼100% +108%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Nokia 5.1
2.8 fps ∼19%
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
6.5 fps ∼45% +132%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus
6.4 fps ∼44% +129%
Huawei Y7 2018
4.6 fps ∼32% +64%
Samsung Galaxy J6 2018
3.2 fps ∼22% +14%
Average Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755 (2.5 - 4.8, n=11)
3.85 fps ∼27% +38%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 88, n=348)
14.4 fps ∼100% +414%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Nokia 5.1
5.2 fps ∼37%
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
6.1 fps ∼44% +17%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus
6.9 fps ∼50% +33%
Huawei Y7 2018
10 fps ∼72% +92%
Samsung Galaxy J6 2018
6.9 fps ∼50% +33%
Average Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755 (2.5 - 11, n=11)
5.66 fps ∼41% +9%
Average of class Smartphone (9.8 - 110, n=351)
13.9 fps ∼100% +167%
GFXBench
High Tier Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Nokia 5.1
fps ∼0%
Samsung Galaxy J6 2018
fps ∼0%
Average Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755
0 fps ∼0%
Average of class Smartphone (3.6 - 59, n=61)
10.3 fps ∼100%
2560x1440 High Tier Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Nokia 5.1
fps ∼0%
Samsung Galaxy J6 2018
fps ∼0%
Average Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755
0 fps ∼0%
Average of class Smartphone (2.2 - 31, n=61)
6.56 fps ∼100%
Normal Tier Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Nokia 5.1
2.3 fps ∼16%
Samsung Galaxy J6 2018
fps ∼0% -100%
Average Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755
2.3 fps ∼16% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (5.7 - 59, n=61)
14.5 fps ∼100% +530%
1920x1080 Normal Tier Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Nokia 5.1
2.7 fps ∼17%
Samsung Galaxy J6 2018
fps ∼0% -100%
Average Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755
2.7 fps ∼17% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (6 - 63, n=60)
15.9 fps ∼100% +489%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Nokia 5.1
2.7 fps ∼27%
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
3.5 fps ∼35% +30%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus
3.5 fps ∼35% +30%
Huawei Y7 2018
2.6 fps ∼26% -4%
Samsung Galaxy J6 2018
2 fps ∼20% -26%
Average Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755 (1.9 - 2.7, n=11)
2.45 fps ∼25% -9%
Average of class Smartphone (6.3 - 54, n=279)
9.88 fps ∼100% +266%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Nokia 5.1
2.8 fps ∼31%
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
3.6 fps ∼40% +29%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus
3.8 fps ∼43% +36%
Huawei Y7 2018
5.4 fps ∼61% +93%
Samsung Galaxy J6 2018
4 fps ∼45% +43%
Average Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755 (1.9 - 5.4, n=11)
2.99 fps ∼34% +7%
Average of class Smartphone (6 - 58, n=282)
8.89 fps ∼100% +218%
Basemark GPU
Vulkan Medium Native (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy J6 2018
2.79 (min: 0.93, max: 7.5) fps ∼10%
Average of class Smartphone (0 - 606, n=34)
28.8 fps ∼100%
1920x1080 Vulkan Medium Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy J6 2018
2.03 (min: 0.9, max: 5.03) fps ∼6%
Average of class Smartphone (0 - 739, n=32)
36.1 fps ∼100%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
79099 Points ∼67%
Huawei Y7 2018
59421 Points ∼50%
Samsung Galaxy J6 2018
62758 Points ∼53%
Average Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755
54819 Points ∼46%
Average of class Smartphone (17073 - 348178, n=169)
118333 Points ∼100%
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sorteer op waarde)
Nokia 5.1
56750 Points ∼75%
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
68348 Points ∼90% +20%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus
63746 Points ∼84% +12%
Huawei Y7 2018
45687 Points ∼60% -19%
Samsung Galaxy J6 2018
47274 Points ∼62% -17%
Average Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755 (44326 - 56750, n=12)
50016 Points ∼66% -12%
Average of class Smartphone (23275 - 254229, n=386)
76035 Points ∼100% +34%
VRMark - Amber Room (sorteer op waarde)
Nokia 5.1
437 Score ∼25%
Samsung Galaxy J6 2018
Score ∼0% -100%
Average Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755
437 Score ∼25% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (0 - 5025, n=39)
1773 Score ∼100% +306%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sorteer op waarde)
Nokia 5.1
10 Points ∼1%
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
753 Points ∼95% +7430%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus
679 Points ∼85% +6690%
Huawei Y7 2018
673 Points ∼85% +6630%
Samsung Galaxy J6 2018
795 Points ∼100% +7850%
Average Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755 (10 - 771, n=11)
199 Points ∼25% +1890%
Average of class Smartphone (7 - 1731, n=498)
698 Points ∼88% +6880%
Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Nokia 5.1
762 Points ∼44%
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
999 Points ∼57% +31%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus
986 Points ∼57% +29%
Huawei Y7 2018
739 Points ∼43% -3%
Samsung Galaxy J6 2018
534 Points ∼31% -30%
Average Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755 (507 - 762, n=11)
658 Points ∼38% -14%
Average of class Smartphone (18 - 15969, n=498)
1738 Points ∼100% +128%
Memory (sorteer op waarde)
Nokia 5.1
144 Points ∼12%
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
996 Points ∼80% +592%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus
584 Points ∼47% +306%
Huawei Y7 2018
1144 Points ∼92% +694%
Samsung Galaxy J6 2018
1086 Points ∼87% +654%
Average Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755 (144 - 1076, n=11)
908 Points ∼73% +531%
Average of class Smartphone (21 - 6283, n=498)
1244 Points ∼100% +764%
System (sorteer op waarde)
Nokia 5.1
2589 Points ∼82%
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
3154 Points ∼100% +22%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus
2914 Points ∼92% +13%
Huawei Y7 2018
1906 Points ∼60% -26%
Samsung Galaxy J6 2018
2208 Points ∼70% -15%
Average Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755 (1868 - 2589, n=11)
2179 Points ∼69% -16%
Average of class Smartphone (369 - 12202, n=498)
2508 Points ∼80% -3%
Overall (sorteer op waarde)
Nokia 5.1
230 Points ∼18%
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
1170 Points ∼93% +409%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus
1033 Points ∼82% +349%
Huawei Y7 2018
1020 Points ∼81% +343%
Samsung Galaxy J6 2018
1004 Points ∼80% +337%
Average Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755 (230 - 1043, n=12)
468 Points ∼37% +103%
Average of class Smartphone (150 - 6097, n=502)
1254 Points ∼100% +445%

Legende

 
Nokia 5.1 Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755, ARM Mali-T860 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 625, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Motorola Moto G5s Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 625, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei Y7 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Qualcomm Adreno 505, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy J6 2018 Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa, ARM Mali-T830 MP1, 32 GB eMMC Flash
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (10.8 - 273, n=421)
36.7 Points ∼100% +63%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus (Chroem Version 62)
26.407 Points ∼72% +17%
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro (Chrome 68)
25.787 Points ∼70% +14%
Average Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755 (18.9 - 27.5, n=12)
24.8 Points ∼68% +10%
Nokia 5.1 (Chrome 70)
22.522 Points ∼61%
Samsung Galaxy J6 2018 (Chrome 67.0.3396.87)
20.745 Points ∼57% -8%
Huawei Y7 2018 (Chrome 66)
17.86 Points ∼49% -21%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (1506 - 43280, n=556)
5550 Points ∼100% +37%
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro (Chrome 68)
4808 Points ∼87% +19%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus (Chroem Version 62)
4456 Points ∼80% +10%
Nokia 5.1 (Chrome 70)
4042 Points ∼73%
Average Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755 (3163 - 4395, n=12)
3867 Points ∼70% -4%
Samsung Galaxy J6 2018 (Chrome 67.0.3396.87)
3721 Points ∼67% -8%
Huawei Y7 2018 (Chrome 66)
3363 Points ∼61% -17%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Huawei Y7 2018 (Chrome 66)
13541 ms * ∼100% -23%
Samsung Galaxy J6 2018 (Chrome 67.0.3396.87)
11916.4 ms * ∼88% -8%
Average of class Smartphone (603 - 59466, n=577)
11486 ms * ∼85% -4%
Average Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755 (9346 - 23914, n=12)
11346 ms * ∼84% -3%
Nokia 5.1 (Chrome 70)
11043 ms * ∼82%
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro (Chrome 68)
9879.9 ms * ∼73% +11%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus (Chroem Version 62)
9360.9 ms * ∼69% +15%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Average of class Smartphone (25 - 161, n=62)
63.6 Points ∼100% +105%
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro (Chrome 68)
38 Points ∼60% +23%
Samsung Galaxy J6 2018 (Chrome 67.0.3396.87)
32 Points ∼50% +3%
Nokia 5.1 (Chrome 70)
31 Points ∼49%
Average Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755
31 Points ∼49% 0%
Huawei Y7 2018 (Chrome 66)
29 Points ∼46% -6%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
Average of class Smartphone (91 - 362, n=283)
111 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro (Chrome 68)
109 Points ∼98%
Samsung Galaxy J6 2018 (Chrome 67.0.3396.87)
91 Points ∼82%
Huawei Y7 2018 (Chrome 66)
82 Points ∼74%
Average Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755 (66 - 72, n=3)
69 Points ∼62%

* ... kleiner is beter

Nokia 5.1Xiaomi Redmi 6 ProMotorola Moto G5s PlusHuawei Y7 2018Samsung Galaxy J6 2018Average 16 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
363%
166%
47%
68%
-7%
63%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
55.53 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
62.2 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
12%
58.85 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
6%
61.5
11%
65.84 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
19%
37 (6.38 - 65.4, n=110)
-33%
45.4 (3.4 - 87.1, n=316)
-18%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
72.58 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
83.5 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
15%
79.58 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
10%
85
17%
81.76 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
13%
55.6 (10.8 - 87.7, n=110)
-23%
63.7 (8.2 - 96.5, n=316)
-12%
Random Write 4KB
4.93
72.6
1373%
44.89
811%
9.5
93%
12.37
151%
7.33 (0.49 - 37.9, n=225)
49%
16.1 (0.14 - 164, n=606)
227%
Random Read 4KB
44.24
66.87
51%
37.94
-14%
38.8
-12%
27.05
-39%
19.9 (2.49 - 61.7, n=225)
-55%
38.3 (1.59 - 173, n=606)
-13%
Sequential Write 256KB
25.96
212.87
720%
75.7
192%
71.5
175%
100.54
287%
41.5 (8.74 - 97.6, n=225)
60%
79.7 (2.99 - 246, n=606)
207%
Sequential Read 256KB
264.47
278.66
5%
237.44
-10%
256
-3%
206.49
-22%
157 (9.66 - 294, n=225)
-41%
230 (12.1 - 895, n=606)
-13%
World of Tanks Blitz
0102030405060Tooltip
; low AA:0x AF:0x: Ø54.8 (44-57)
; high AA:0x AF:0x: Ø24 (5-50)
Asphalt 9
0102030Tooltip
; High Quality: Ø22.6 (14-28)
; Standard / low: Ø25.2 (16-29)
Max. Belasting
 37.6 °C37.7 °C36.9 °C 
 37.7 °C35.8 °C35.9 °C 
 36.6 °C31.6 °C36.8 °C 
Maximum: 37.7 °C
Gemiddelde: 36.3 °C
35.7 °C35.7 °C35.4 °C
35.9 °C35.3 °C35.4 °C
35.7 °C35.1 °C34.6 °C
Maximum: 35.9 °C
Gemiddelde: 35.4 °C
Stroomadapter (max.)  36.6 °C | Kamertemperatuur 21.1 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 36.3 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37.7 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 35.7 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 35.9 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 34.2 °C / 94 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.7 °C / 87 F, compared to the device average of 33.2 °C / 92 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2030.738.42525253126.820.64026.326.45029.833.36327.425.4802124.910019.524.112518.821.916019.220.420017.625.825016.936.131515.844.14001550.75001558.763014.76480014.868.9100014.671.7125014.372.1160013.471.8200014.473.6250014.473.1315014.872.140001574.4500014.878.1630014.773.980001569.41000014.967.21250015.267.91600015.757.6SPL26.884.8N0.957.3median 15median 67.9Delta1.214.135.24032.943.237.238.531.737.239.636.628.338.227.334.726.934.826.734.72440.120.949.320.95219.556.418.558.617.566.617.568.415.775.715.875.416.673.115.868.515.468.715.568.81669.815.877.41682.916.375.516.378.716.283.316.483.516.467.428.688.91.172.8median 16.4median 68.72.19.6hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseNokia 5.1Motorola Moto G5s Plus
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Nokia 5.1 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 39.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (27% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 66% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 79% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 16% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Motorola Moto G5s Plus audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.1% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.9% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 13% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 77% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 44% of all tested devices were better, 9% similar, 47% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Stroomgebruik
Uit / Standbydarklight 0.02 / 0.38 Watt
Inactiefdarkmidlight 1.38 / 2.14 / 2.2 Watt
Belasting midlight 4.21 / 6.81 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Nokia 5.1
2970 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
4000 mAh
Motorola Moto G5s Plus
3000 mAh
Huawei Y7 2018
3000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy J6 2018
3000 mAh
Average Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-11%
23%
9%
22%
4%
17%
Idle Minimum *
1.38
1.3
6%
0.83
40%
0.9
35%
0.85
38%
1.2 (0.72 - 2.6, n=12)
13%
0.881 (0.2 - 3.4, n=634)
36%
Idle Average *
2.14
2.1
2%
1.67
22%
1.9
11%
1.51
29%
2.08 (1.41 - 3.21, n=12)
3%
1.721 (0.6 - 6.2, n=633)
20%
Idle Maximum *
2.2
3.7
-68%
1.85
16%
2.3
-5%
1.57
29%
2.29 (1.57 - 3.45, n=12)
-4%
1.998 (0.74 - 6.6, n=634)
9%
Load Average *
4.21
4.5
-7%
3.47
18%
4.7
-12%
4.21
-0%
4.51 (2.91 - 7.7, n=12)
-7%
4.03 (0.8 - 10.8, n=628)
4%
Load Maximum *
6.81
6
12%
5.41
21%
5.7
16%
5.88
14%
5.91 (2.93 - 9.16, n=12)
13%
5.75 (1.2 - 14.2, n=628)
16%

* ... kleiner is beter

Batterijduur
Inactief (zonder WLAN, minimale helderheid)
17h 01min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
8h 43min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
10h 31min
Belast (maximale helderheid)
2h 55min
Nokia 5.1
2970 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
4000 mAh
Motorola Moto G5s Plus
3000 mAh
Huawei Y7 2018
3000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy J6 2018
3000 mAh
Batterijduur
75%
91%
24%
47%
Reader / Idle
1021
1765
73%
1496
47%
1305
28%
1495
46%
H.264
631
1214
92%
687
9%
869
38%
WiFi v1.3
523
868
66%
974
86%
624
19%
708
35%
Load
175
293
67%
419
139%
245
40%
297
70%

Pro

+ aantrekkelijk design
+ feilloze bouwkwaliteit
+ vingerafdruklezer
+ scherm met hoge resolutie
+ Android One
+ geen bloatware
+ ondersteunt talrijke LTE-banden
+ stevig
+ responsief touchscreen
+ beperkte warmteontwikkeling
+ dual-SIM
+ aparte microSD-sleuf

Contra

- ergonomie van inbegrepen headset zou beter mogen
- ongebruikte, zwarte schermrand aan de onderzijde
- verouderde SoC
- beperkte interne opslag
- weinig RAM
- slechte batterijduur
Onder de loep: Nokia 5.1: Testtoestel voorzien door HMD Global Germany en
Onder de loep: Nokia 5.1: Testtoestel voorzien door HMD Global Germany en

Dit is de verkorte versie van het originele artikel. Het volledige, Engelse testrapport vind je hier.

De Nokia 5.1 is ontworpen als een instap-smartphone voor gebruikers met duidelijke kwaliteitsstandaarden. Daar lijkt het tenminste op en op dat vlak slaagt de telefoon ook in zijn doel. Gebruikers krijgen een goedkope telefoon waar op het eerste zicht weinig op is aan te merken. Het design is tijdloos en elegant en de materialen zien er erg hoogwaardig uit. Het scherm is groot, helder genoeg en heeft een hoge resolutie. Het toestel voelt ook prima aan in de hand. Hoewel de interne specificaties wat minder indrukwekkend zijn, liggen ze in lijn van de verwachte prijs/prestaties-verhouding en kunnen we ze dus beschouwen als verstandige besparingen. De kwaliteit van de camera is bovengemiddeld en sluit aan bij de doelgroep. Kort gezegd is dit de ideale instap-smartphone voor wie een oerdegelijke telefoon met een premium van 50 euro verkiest boven een mid-range, geïmporteerd toestel met betere specificaties, maar ook een moeilijkere garantiesituatie.

Het perfecte instaptoestel in de wereld van smartphones.

Onze grootste klacht heeft betrekking op de krappe interne opslag. Hier zou 32 GB wat meer ruimte hebben gelaten aan gebruikers. Daarnaast is er nog de batterijduur, die veel te kort is.

Toch is de smartphone een uitstekende keuze voor wie zijn smartphone vooral gebruikt voor telefoongesprekken, het sturen van SMS'en en e-mails, surfen op het web of het occasioneel spelen van een minder veeleisende game. We raden echter aan om ook ineens een geheugenkaart en powerbank mee aan te schaffen.

Nokia 5.1 - 16-11-2018 v6
Florian Schaar

Behuizing
92%
Toetsenbord
62 / 75 → 83%
Aanwijsapparaat
92%
Aansluitmogelijkheden
44 / 60 → 74%
Gewicht
92%
Batterij
91%
Beeldscherm
86%
Gaming-performance
17 / 63 → 26%
Applicatie-performance
31 / 70 → 44%
Temperatuur
91%
Luidheid
100%
Audio
54 / 91 → 59%
Camera
66%
Gemiddelde
71%
82%
Smartphone - Gewogen Gemiddelde

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Overzichten en testrapporten over laptops en mobieltjes > Testrapporten > Kort testrapport Nokia 5.1 Smartphone
Florian Schaar, 2018-11-21 (Update: 2018-11-21)