Notebookcheck

Kort testrapport Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet 2018 (i5, 3K-IPS) Convertible

Andreas Osthoff, 👁 Andreas Osthoff, 20-01-2019

De beste zakelijke convertible? Lenovo heeft de ThinkPad X1-tablet volledig opnieuw ontworpen en bevat nu een groter aanraakscherm, twee Thunderbolt 3-poorten en een veel snellere CPU. Dit vraagt echter actieve koeling van de chips. Is de derde generatie van de ThinkPad X1-tablet een solide en compleet pakket of heeft het een aantal belangrijke zwakke punten?

Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE (ThinkPad Tablet Serie)
Grafische kaart
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Core: 1100 MHz, Geheugen: 933 MHz
Geheugen
8192 MB 
, LPDDR3 2133MHz, gesoldeerd
Beeldscherm
13 inch 3:2, 3000 x 2000 pixel 271 PPI, capacitief, native pen support, LP130QP1-SPA1, IPS LED, glimmend: ja, detachable screen
Moederbord
Intel Kaby Lake-U iHDCP 2.2 Premium PCH
Opslag
Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, 256 GB 
, M.2 2280, PCIe NVMe, 210 GB beschikbaar
Geluidskaart
Intel Kaby Lake-U/Y PCH - High Definition Audio
Verbindingen
2 USB 3.1 Gen2, 2 Thunderbolt, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Verbindingen: 3.5 mm gecombineerde audiopoort, Card Reader: microSD, 1 Vingerafdruklezer, Brightness Sensor, Sensoren: gyroscoop, versnellingsmeter, pogo-pin aansluiting voor het toetsenbord
Netwerkmogelijkheden
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 4.2, LTE (Qualcomm Snapdgragon X7), LTE
Afmetingen
hoogte x breedte x diepte (in mm): 8.9 x 304 x 225.6
Batterij
42 Wh Lithium-Ion, 4 cellen, Batterijduur: 9.5 h
Besturingssysteem
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
Camera
Primary Camera: 8 MPix autofocus, flits
Secondary Camera: 2 MPix
Bijkomende functionaliteiten
Luidsprekers: Stereo, Toetsenbord: Virtueel toetsenbord plus fysieke 6-rijen Chiclet toetsenbord, Toetsenbordverlichting: ja, 65 Watt lader (USB-C), ThinkPad Pen Pro, Lenovo Vantage, 36 Maanden Garantie
Gewicht
1.279 kg, Voeding: 356 g
Prijs
1750 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Size & weight comparison

323.5 mm 217.1 mm 15.95 mm 1.1 kg316 mm 207 mm 9.1 mm 1.4 kg304 mm 225.6 mm 8.9 mm 1.3 kg300 mm 231.5 mm 7.9 mm 1.2 kg293 mm 210 mm 9 mm 1.1 kg292 mm 210 mm 9.75 mm 1.3 kg292 mm 201 mm 8.5 mm 1.1 kg
Linkerkant: MicroSD kaartlezer & NanoSIM, 2x Thunderbolt 3, Kensington lock, gecombineerde audiopoort
Linkerkant: MicroSD kaartlezer & NanoSIM, 2x Thunderbolt 3, Kensington lock, gecombineerde audiopoort
Rechterkant: Aansluiting voor optionele penhouder, volumeknop, aan/uitknop (verlicht)
Rechterkant: Aansluiting voor optionele penhouder, volumeknop, aan/uitknop (verlicht)
Onderkant: Pogo-pin aansluiting
Onderkant: Pogo-pin aansluiting
SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Dell Latitude 5290 2-in-1
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 UHS-II)
142.2 MB/s ∼100% +80%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 UHS-II)
78.9 MB/s ∼55%
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB)
78.5 MB/s ∼55% -1%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
72.62 MB/s ∼51% -8%
Average of class Convertible
  (7.5 - 197, n=135)
62.7 MB/s ∼44% -21%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Dell Latitude 5290 2-in-1
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 UHS-II)
211.8 MB/s ∼100% +152%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
93.77 MB/s ∼44% +11%
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB)
86.4 MB/s ∼41% +3%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 UHS-II)
84.2 MB/s ∼40%
Average of class Convertible
  (19.2 - 246, n=131)
78 MB/s ∼37% -7%
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Dell Latitude 5290 2-in-1
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
653 MBit/s ∼100% +3%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
633 MBit/s ∼97%
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB
Marvell AVASTAR Wireless-AC Network Controller
593 (min: 560, max: 611) MBit/s ∼91% -6%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
586 MBit/s ∼90% -7%
Average of class Convertible
  (28.7 - 1420, n=149)
495 MBit/s ∼76% -22%
Toshiba Portege X30T-E-109
Intel 8265 Tri-Band WiFi (Oak Peak) Network Adapter
461 (min: 329, max: 528) MBit/s ∼71% -27%
HP Elite x2 1013 G3-2TT14EA
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
314 MBit/s ∼48% -50%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
HP Elite x2 1013 G3-2TT14EA
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
598 MBit/s ∼100% +16%
Toshiba Portege X30T-E-109
Intel 8265 Tri-Band WiFi (Oak Peak) Network Adapter
598 (min: 549, max: 624) MBit/s ∼100% +16%
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB
Marvell AVASTAR Wireless-AC Network Controller
559 (min: 519, max: 577) MBit/s ∼93% +9%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
514 MBit/s ∼86%
Average of class Convertible
  (36.4 - 1380, n=149)
500 MBit/s ∼84% -3%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
440 MBit/s ∼74% -14%
Dell Latitude 5290 2-in-1
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
305 MBit/s ∼51% -41%
419
cd/m²
403
cd/m²
368
cd/m²
445
cd/m²
474
cd/m²
370
cd/m²
442
cd/m²
475
cd/m²
363
cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling
LP130QP1-SPA1
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 475 cd/m² Gemiddelde: 417.7 cd/m² Minimum: 5 cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling: 76 %
Helderheid in Batterij-modus: 470 cd/m²
Contrast: 1436:1 (Zwart: 0.33 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.2 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6, calibrated: 0.9
ΔE Greyscale 4.5 | 0.64-98 Ø6.2
99.4% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 64% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.07
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
LP130QP1-SPA1, , 3000x2000, 13
HP Elite x2 1013 G3-2TT14EA
AU Optronics AUO101A, , 3000x2000, 13
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB
LGPhilips LP123WQ112604, , 2736x1824, 12.3
Dell Latitude 5290 2-in-1
SHP1479, , 1920x1280, 12.3
Toshiba Portege X30T-E-109
Toshiba TOS508F, , 1920x1080, 13.3
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2
LSN120QL01L01, , 2160x1440, 12
Response Times
20%
25%
-3%
12%
43%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
47.2 (21.2, 26)
47 (23, 24)
-0%
43 (21, 22)
9%
56.8 (26.8, 30)
-20%
42 (22, 20)
11%
28.4 (15.2, 13.2)
40%
Response Time Black / White *
42.4 (19.6, 22.8)
26 (14, 12)
39%
25 (13, 12)
41%
36 (19.6, 16.4)
15%
37 (17, 20)
13%
22.8 (13.6, 9.2)
46%
PWM Frequency
22000 (50)
1852 (98)
17000 (100)
221.2 (49)
Screen
-18%
-5%
-16%
-39%
-23%
Brightness middle
474
452
-5%
484
2%
548
16%
350
-26%
388.1
-18%
Brightness
418
412
-1%
473
13%
545
30%
343
-18%
344
-18%
Brightness Distribution
76
85
12%
91
20%
86
13%
73
-4%
78
3%
Black Level *
0.33
0.48
-45%
0.33
-0%
0.51
-55%
0.29
12%
0.39
-18%
Contrast
1436
942
-34%
1467
2%
1075
-25%
1207
-16%
995
-31%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
3.2
4.05
-27%
4.29
-34%
3.65
-14%
6.36
-99%
4.6
-44%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
6.1
6.64
-9%
6.46
-6%
7.15
-17%
11.63
-91%
9.1
-49%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
0.9
1.56
-73%
1.34
-49%
1.81
-101%
1.7
-89%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
4.5
4.87
-8%
4.3
4%
5.5
-22%
8.04
-79%
6.1
-36%
Gamma
2.07 106%
2.71 81%
2.51 88%
2.154 102%
2.47 89%
2.07 106%
CCT
5881 111%
7160 91%
7315 89%
7052 92%
7716 84%
7104 91%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
64
62
-3%
62
-3%
65.2
2%
59
-8%
59
-8%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
99.4
97
-2%
95
-4%
99.1
0%
91
-8%
91
-8%
Totaal Gemiddelde (Programma / Instellingen)
1% / -12%
10% / -0%
-10% / -14%
-14% / -31%
10% / -12%

* ... kleiner is beter

Responstijd Scherm

De responstijden van het scherm tonen hoe snel het scherm in staat is om van één kleur naar de andere te veranderen. Trage responstijden kunnen aanleiding geven tot 'nabeelden' rond bewegende objecten of het scherm wazig maken (blur). Vooral spelers van snelle 3D-games hebben baat bij een scherm met snelle responstijden.
       Responstijd Zwart naar Wit
42.4 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd↗ 19.6 ms stijging
↘ 22.8 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde trage responstijden in onze tests en is misschien te traag voor games.
Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.8 (minimum) tot 240 (maximum) ms. » 98 % van alle toestellen zijn beter.
Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd slechter is dan het gemiddelde (24.9 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.
       Responstijd 50% Grijs naar 80% Grijs
47.2 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd↗ 21.2 ms stijging
↘ 26 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde trage responstijden in onze tests en is misschien te traag voor games.
Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.9 (minimum) tot 636 (maximum) ms. » 76 % van alle toestellen zijn beter.
Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd slechter is dan het gemiddelde (39.5 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Om de schermhelderheid te verlagen schakelen sommige laptops het backlight erg snel aan en uit. Dit gebeurt aan een dergelijk hoge frequentie dat het niet zichtbaar is voor het menselijk oog. Als de frequentie te laag is kunnen personen met gevoelige ogen geïrriteerd geraken, hoofdpijn krijgen en zelfs flickering waarnemen.
Screen flickering / PWM niet waargenomen

Ter vergelijking: 51 % van alle geteste toestellen maakten geen gebruik van PWM om de schermhelderheid te verlagen. Als het wel werd gebruikt, werd een gemiddelde van 13560 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 2500000) Hz waargenomen.

 
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB
Intel Core i7-8650U
163 Points ∼100% +16%
Dell Latitude 5290 2-in-1
Intel Core i5-8350U
151 Points ∼93% +7%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3 LTE i7
Intel Core i7-8550U
148 Points ∼91% +5%
HP Elite x2 1013 G3-2TT14EA
Intel Core i5-8350U
147 Points ∼90% +4%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
Intel Core i5-8250U
141 Points ∼87%
Toshiba Portege X30T-E-109
Intel Core i7-8550U
141 Points ∼87% 0%
Average Intel Core i5-8250U
  (81 - 147, n=94)
141 Points ∼87% 0%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2
Intel Core i5-7Y54
115 Points ∼71% -18%
Average of class Convertible
  (19 - 195, n=309)
107 Points ∼66% -24%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
Intel Core i5-8250U (Undervolting)
695 Points ∼100%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
Intel Core i5-8250U
661 Points ∼95% -5%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3 LTE i7
Intel Core i7-8550U
681 Points ∼98% -2%
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB
Intel Core i7-8650U
639 Points ∼92% -8%
Average Intel Core i5-8250U
  (320 - 730, n=98)
568 Points ∼82% -18%
HP Elite x2 1013 G3-2TT14EA
Intel Core i5-8350U
517 Points ∼74% -26%
Dell Latitude 5290 2-in-1
Intel Core i5-8350U
514 Points ∼74% -26%
Toshiba Portege X30T-E-109
Intel Core i7-8550U
432 Points ∼62% -38%
Average of class Convertible
  (33 - 830, n=318)
307 Points ∼44% -56%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2
Intel Core i5-7Y54
234 Points ∼34% -66%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700Tooltip
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel Core i5-8250U; Undervolting: Ø640 (589.9-694.88)
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel Core i5-8250U: Ø550 (498.05-645.36)
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3 LTE i7 Intel Core i7-8550U, Intel Core i7-8550U: Ø440 (400.14-681.55)
Dell Latitude 5290 2-in-1 Intel Core i5-8350U, Intel Core i5-8350U: Ø488 (465.07-568.99)
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i5, 128 GB Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel Core i5-8250U: Ø452 (434.07-584.91)
HP Elite x2 1013 G3-2TT14EA Intel Core i5-8350U, Intel Core i5-8350U: Ø486 (481.08-516.94)
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB Intel Core i7-8650U, Intel Core i7-8650U: Ø571 (559.56-638.59)
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
141 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
695 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
97.8 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
50.33 %
Help
PCMark 10 - Score
Dell Latitude 5290 2-in-1
UHD Graphics 620, 8350U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G
3737 Points ∼100% +5%
HP Elite x2 1013 G3-2TT14EA
UHD Graphics 620, 8350U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
3559 Points ∼95% 0%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
3544 Points ∼95%
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB
UHD Graphics 620, 8650U, Toshiba KBG30ZPZ512G
3448 Points ∼92% -3%
Toshiba Portege X30T-E-109
UHD Graphics 620, 8550U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
3335 Points ∼89% -6%
Average Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (3407 - 4081, n=65)
3292 Points ∼88% -7%
Average of class Convertible
  (872 - 4677, n=110)
3217 Points ∼86% -9%
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Dell Latitude 5290 2-in-1
UHD Graphics 620, 8350U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G
4764 Points ∼100% +15%
Average Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (2699 - 5106, n=57)
4649 Points ∼98% +12%
Toshiba Portege X30T-E-109
UHD Graphics 620, 8550U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
4348 Points ∼91% +5%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2
HD Graphics 615, 7Y54, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
4288 Points ∼90% +4%
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB
UHD Graphics 620, 8650U, Toshiba KBG30ZPZ512G
4262 Points ∼89% +3%
HP Elite x2 1013 G3-2TT14EA
UHD Graphics 620, 8350U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
4200 Points ∼88% +2%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
4136 Points ∼87%
Average of class Convertible
  (1007 - 5366, n=236)
3765 Points ∼79% -9%
Creative Score Accelerated v2
Dell Latitude 5290 2-in-1
UHD Graphics 620, 8350U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G
4961 Points ∼100% +4%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
4767 Points ∼96%
HP Elite x2 1013 G3-2TT14EA
UHD Graphics 620, 8350U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
4669 Points ∼94% -2%
Average Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (3308 - 5090, n=35)
4594 Points ∼93% -4%
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB
UHD Graphics 620, 8650U, Toshiba KBG30ZPZ512G
4454 Points ∼90% -7%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2
HD Graphics 615, 7Y54, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
3924 Points ∼79% -18%
Average of class Convertible
  (766 - 6165, n=172)
3383 Points ∼68% -29%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Dell Latitude 5290 2-in-1
UHD Graphics 620, 8350U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G
3776 Points ∼100% +9%
Average Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (2986 - 4458, n=68)
3592 Points ∼95% +3%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
3479 Points ∼92%
HP Elite x2 1013 G3-2TT14EA
UHD Graphics 620, 8350U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
3413 Points ∼90% -2%
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB
UHD Graphics 620, 8650U, Toshiba KBG30ZPZ512G
3281 Points ∼87% -6%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2
HD Graphics 615, 7Y54, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
3092 Points ∼82% -11%
Toshiba Portege X30T-E-109
UHD Graphics 620, 8550U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
3024 Points ∼80% -13%
Average of class Convertible
  (741 - 4741, n=285)
2813 Points ∼74% -19%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
3479 punten
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
4767 punten
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
4136 punten
Help
Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
Sequential Read: 1604.3 MB/s
Sequential Write: 1220.5 MB/s
512K Read: 590.38 MB/s
512K Write: 691.96 MB/s
4K Read: 48.26 MB/s
4K Write: 96.99 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 257.15 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 392.64 MB/s
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-8650U
1977 Points ∼100% +9%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8250U
1812 Points ∼92%
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (1235 - 2006, n=175)
1718 Points ∼87% -5%
Dell Latitude 5290 2-in-1
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8350U
1660 Points ∼84% -8%
HP Elite x2 1013 G3-2TT14EA
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8350U
1660 Points ∼84% -8%
Toshiba Portege X30T-E-109
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-8550U
1494 Points ∼76% -18%
Average of class Convertible
  (173 - 7483, n=334)
1307 Points ∼66% -28%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2
Intel HD Graphics 615, Intel Core i5-7Y54
1161 Points ∼59% -36%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8250U
1189 Points ∼100%
Dell Latitude 5290 2-in-1
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8350U
1185 Points ∼100% 0%
HP Elite x2 1013 G3-2TT14EA
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8350U
1131 Points ∼95% -5%
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (557 - 1401, n=146)
1128 Points ∼95% -5%
Average of class Convertible
  (132 - 5965, n=244)
1037 Points ∼87% -13%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2
Intel HD Graphics 615, Intel Core i5-7Y54
728 Points ∼61% -39%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-8650U
10213 Points ∼100% +12%
Dell Latitude 5290 2-in-1
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8350U
9307 Points ∼91% +2%
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (6910 - 11436, n=164)
9144 Points ∼90% 0%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8250U
9133 Points ∼89%
HP Elite x2 1013 G3-2TT14EA
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8350U
8330 Points ∼82% -9%
Average of class Convertible
  (1023 - 37388, n=295)
6858 Points ∼67% -25%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2
Intel HD Graphics 615, Intel Core i5-7Y54
6164 Points ∼60% -33%
3DMark 11 Performance
2041 punten
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
8625 punten
3DMark Fire Strike Score
1103 punten
Help
lage gem. hoge ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 59.2 34.8 30.2 10.1 fps
The Witcher 3 (2015) 12.1 fps
Rocket League (2017) 59.2 35.1 23.1 fps
3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance Physics
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
8250U, GeForce GTX 1050 (Laptop)
7984 Points ∼100% +4%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
8250U, UHD Graphics 620
7687 Points ∼96%
1280x720 Performance GPU
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
8250U, GeForce GTX 1050 (Laptop)
6759 Points ∼100% +273%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
8250U, UHD Graphics 620
1812 Points ∼27%
1280x720 Performance
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
8250U, GeForce GTX 1050 (Laptop)
6824 Points ∼100% +234%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
8250U, UHD Graphics 620
2041 Points ∼30%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Physics
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
8250U, GeForce GTX 1050 (Laptop)
10115 Points ∼100% +5%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
8250U, UHD Graphics 620
9670 Points ∼96%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
8250U, GeForce GTX 1050 (Laptop)
4935 Points ∼100% +315%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
8250U, UHD Graphics 620
1189 Points ∼24%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Score
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
8250U, GeForce GTX 1050 (Laptop)
4658 Points ∼100% +322%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
8250U, UHD Graphics 620
1103 Points ∼24%
BioShock Infinite
1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF)
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
8250U, GeForce GTX 1050 (Laptop)
49.9 fps ∼100% +394%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
8250U, UHD Graphics 620
10.1 fps ∼20%
1366x768 High Preset
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
8250U, GeForce GTX 1050 (Laptop)
113 fps ∼100% +274%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
8250U, UHD Graphics 620
30.2 fps ∼27%
1366x768 Medium Preset
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
8250U, GeForce GTX 1050 (Laptop)
126.6 fps ∼100% +264%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
8250U, UHD Graphics 620
34.8 fps ∼27%
1280x720 Very Low Preset
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
8250U, GeForce GTX 1050 (Laptop)
178.5 fps ∼100% +202%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
8250U, UHD Graphics 620
59.2 fps ∼33%
Rocket League
1920x1080 High Quality AA:High FX
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
8250U, GeForce GTX 1050 (Laptop)
64 fps ∼100% +177%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
8250U, UHD Graphics 620
23.1 fps ∼36%
1920x1080 Quality AA:Medium FX
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
8250U, GeForce GTX 1050 (Laptop)
88 fps ∼100% +151%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
8250U, UHD Graphics 620
35.1 fps ∼40%
1280x720 Performance
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
8250U, GeForce GTX 1050 (Laptop)
149 fps ∼100% +152%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
8250U, UHD Graphics 620
59.2 fps ∼40%
The Witcher 3
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
8250U, GeForce GTX 1050 (Laptop)
15.7 fps ∼100%
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
8250U, GeForce GTX 1050 (Laptop)
29.6 fps ∼100%
1366x768 Medium Graphics & Postprocessing
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
8250U, GeForce GTX 1050 (Laptop)
47.2 fps ∼100%
1024x768 Low Graphics & Postprocessing
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
8250U, GeForce GTX 1050 (Laptop)
56.8 fps ∼100% +369%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
8250U, UHD Graphics 620
12.1 fps ∼21%
0102030Tooltip
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE GeForce GTX 1050 (Laptop), 8250U: Ø27.6 (26-29)

Geluidsniveau

Onbelast
29.8 / 29.8 / 31.3 dB (A)
Belasting
35.9 / 38.6 dB (A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
stil
40 dB(A)
hoorbaar
50 dB(A)
luid
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm afstand)   environment noise: 29.8 dB(A)
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
HP Elite x2 1013 G3-2TT14EA
UHD Graphics 620, 8350U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB
UHD Graphics 620, 8650U, Toshiba KBG30ZPZ512G
Dell Latitude 5290 2-in-1
UHD Graphics 620, 8350U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G
Toshiba Portege X30T-E-109
UHD Graphics 620, 8550U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
Noise
3%
3%
6%
2%
off / environment *
29.8
30.3
-2%
30.3
-2%
28.5
4%
30.3
-2%
Idle Minimum *
29.8
30.3
-2%
30.3
-2%
28.5
4%
30.9
-4%
Idle Average *
29.8
30.3
-2%
30.3
-2%
28.5
4%
30.9
-4%
Idle Maximum *
31.3
31.2
-0%
30.3
3%
28.5
9%
32.3
-3%
Load Average *
35.9
32.8
9%
33.5
7%
28.5
21%
32.7
9%
Load Maximum *
38.6
32.9
15%
33.5
13%
41.6
-8%
32.7
15%

* ... kleiner is beter

Max. Belasting
 35.1 °C42.4 °C44.3 °C 
 35.2 °C37.8 °C38 °C 
 36.5 °C37.6 °C34.3 °C 
Maximum: 44.3 °C
Gemiddelde: 37.9 °C
47.3 °C48.9 °C43.2 °C
41.5 °C42.4 °C39.9 °C
33 °C33.1 °C32.6 °C
Maximum: 48.9 °C
Gemiddelde: 40.2 °C
Stroomadapter (max.)  39.1 °C | Kamertemperatuur 22 °C | Voltcraft IR-900
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 37.9 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 30.3 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Convertible.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.3 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 21.8 to 55.7 °C for the class Convertible.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 48.9 °C / 120 F, compared to the average of 36.5 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.7 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 37.6 °C / 99.7 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-8.7 °C / -15.7 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2033.933.12529.431.83133.731.84032.529.65027.929.26328.325.58026.425.810025.626.512525.62516023.729.820022.935.125022.440.431520.744.140019.450.250019.154.363018.356.580018.660.3100018.161125017.659.5160016.661.4200016.464.4250016.664.3315016.865.2400017.361.9500017.359630017.563.2800017.855.21000017.937.71250017.834.6160001832.8SPL29.873.6N1.330.4median 18median 55.2Delta1.711.930.831.930.832.33432.333.233.533.229.732.729.728.53328.528.328.828.326.627.326.630.125.730.141.124.641.150.223.750.253.322.453.353.521.753.555.420.955.457.920.957.951.419.351.462.118.562.171.318.471.374.118.474.171.117.671.173.117.573.169.917.669.973.317.773.374.417.674.466.51866.568.218.168.264.718.164.762.318.162.361.118.361.160.518.160.565.318.165.382.630.482.649.21.349.2median 62.3median 18.3median 62.37.71.97.733.331.433.330.530.930.533.830.433.832.728.632.73130.83128.927.128.928.52828.534.82634.84225.44249.523.649.551.922.451.951.321.551.352.720.652.758.620.558.658.419.358.461.818.961.869.418.369.46618.16659.717.759.761.517.461.566.317.366.368.917.668.969.117.869.163.71863.764.618.164.658.218.458.253.518.353.556.118.356.147.618.247.637.618.237.67730.47736.71.336.7median 58.4median 18.3median 58.46.71.96.7hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseLenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGEHP Elite x2 1013 G3-2TT14EAMicrosoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (73.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (31.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 87% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 11% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 90% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 6% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

HP Elite x2 1013 G3-2TT14EA audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (74.36 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.9% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (11.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 39% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 50% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 38% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 55% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (69.06 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 36% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 52% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 35% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 58% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Stroomgebruik
Uit / Standbydarklight 0.16 / 0.8 Watt
Inactiefdarkmidlight 4.8 / 9 / 10.5 Watt
Belasting midlight 42.8 / 57.8 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
8250U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 3000x2000, 13
HP Elite x2 1013 G3-2TT14EA
8350U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 3000x2000, 13
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB
8650U, UHD Graphics 620, Toshiba KBG30ZPZ512G, IPS, 2736x1824, 12.3
Dell Latitude 5290 2-in-1
8350U, UHD Graphics 620, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G, IPS, 1920x1280, 12.3
Toshiba Portege X30T-E-109
8550U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2
7Y54, HD Graphics 615, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 2160x1440, 12
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620
 
Average of class Convertible
 
Power Consumption
11%
20%
22%
5%
34%
20%
22%
Idle Minimum *
4.8
4.9
-2%
3.2
33%
3
37%
4.7
2%
5
-4%
3.84 (1 - 12.4, n=185)
20%
4.65 (1 - 23, n=385)
3%
Idle Average *
9
8.9
1%
8.7
3%
7.2
20%
9.4
-4%
6.3
30%
7.04 (3.7 - 15.5, n=185)
22%
7.8 (1.3 - 32.3, n=385)
13%
Idle Maximum *
10.5
11
-5%
10.4
1%
10
5%
16
-52%
7.8
26%
8.82 (3.8 - 16.6, n=185)
16%
9.31 (1.8 - 61, n=385)
11%
Load Average *
42.8
32
25%
29.2
32%
37.1
13%
26.4
38%
19.5
54%
35.2 (8.1 - 51.6, n=185)
18%
26.6 (1.4 - 94, n=383)
38%
Load Maximum *
57.8
36
38%
40.8
29%
38.2
34%
34
41%
19.6
66%
44.9 (22 - 79, n=185)
22%
32.1 (6.8 - 117, n=384)
44%

* ... kleiner is beter

Batterijduur
Inactief (zonder WLAN, minimale helderheid)
13h 10min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3 (Edge 42.17134.1.0)
6h 35min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
8h 43min
Belast (maximale helderheid)
1h 23min
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 42 Wh
HP Elite x2 1013 G3-2TT14EA
8350U, UHD Graphics 620, 50 Wh
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB
8650U, UHD Graphics 620, 45 Wh
Dell Latitude 5290 2-in-1
8350U, UHD Graphics 620, 42 Wh
Toshiba Portege X30T-E-109
8550U, UHD Graphics 620,  Wh
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2
7Y54, HD Graphics 615, 37 Wh
Average of class Convertible
 
Batterijduur
14%
41%
-12%
39%
19%
19%
Reader / Idle
790
781
-1%
1083
37%
662
-16%
776 (117 - 2223, n=291)
-2%
H.264
523
389
-26%
455 (206 - 1070, n=116)
-13%
WiFi v1.3
395
459
16%
509
29%
300
-24%
551
39%
441
12%
457 (153 - 1010, n=261)
16%
Load
83
137
65%
131
58%
84
1%
134
61%
145 (49 - 677, n=288)
75%

Pro

+ stabiele, hoogwaardige behuizing
+ goede CPU prestaties
+ zeer goede invoerapparaten
+ meegeleverde toetsenbord & pen
+ geïntegreerde LTE
+ 2x Thunderbolt 3
+ zeer goed beeldscherm
+ 3 jaar garatnei
+ helderheidssensor voor toetsenbordverlichting

Contra

- glanzend beeldscherm
- geen USB a poorten
- ventilatoren zijn duidelijk hoorbaar
- hoge temperaturen onder belasting
- middelmatige batterijlevensduur
- slechte luidsprekers
- vuil is goed zichtbaar op de behuizing
Getest: Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3. Testmodel geleverd door Campuspoint.
Getest: Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3. Testmodel geleverd door Campuspoint.

Voor het volledige, Engelse testrapport, klik hier.

Laten we beginnen met onze introductievraag - is de nieuwe Lenovo ThinkPad X1-tablet de beste zakelijke convertible? Deze vraag kan in het algemeen niet worden beantwoord, omdat de concurrerende apparaten gewoon te verschillend zijn in de details. Dit is afhankelijk van hoe de gebruiker van plan is het apparaat te gebruiken. Als een lange batterijlevensduur nodig is en als het apparaat vaak buitenshuis wordt gebruikt, zijn er betere alternatieven. Andere apparaten bieden ook meer en verschillende poorten. Als een mat beeldscherm vereist is, zal de gebruiker ook niet blij zijn met de X1-tablet.

Desalniettemin hebben we in de beoordeling gezien dat de derde generatie van de X1-tablet over het algemeen een zeer goed apparaat is. Ja, er zijn zwakke punten, maar die hebben niet op elke gebruiker dezelfde invloed. Als het apparaat voornamelijk wordt gebruikt met een dockingstation en de tablet voornamelijk wordt gebruikt voor het maken van aantekeningen tijdens een vergadering, zou de gemiddelde batterijlevensduur en ontbrekende USB A-poort geen probleem moeten zijn.

Laten we het hebben over de positieve aspecten: een stabiele behuizing, zeer goede invoerapparaten met een uitstekend toetsenbord, een zeer goed beeldscherm (vooral wanneer gekalibreerd) en USB C met Thunderbolt 3. Met de overschakeling naar moderne quad-core CPU's, levert de convertible een vergelijkbaar niveau van CPU-prestaties als normale zakelijke Ultrabooks, hoewel dit betekent dat de ventilator hoorbaar is en dat de temperaturen behoorlijk hoog zijn onder zware belasting. Dat gezegd hebbende, is de optionele i7 CPU-optie voor de X1-tablet zijn geld niet waard en veel langzamer dan de i5 onder continue belasting.

Met de volledig opnieuw ontworpen ThinkPad X1 Tablet biedt Lenovo een zeer goede zakelijke convertible, die de grens tussen tablet en een typisch zakelijk subnotebook verder verwatert. De X1-tablet biedt echter geen nieuwe records qua batterijlevensduur en de optionele i7 CPU is zijn geld niet waard.

Dat de grenzen tussen de bekende apparatenklassen steeds meer vervagen, wordt duidelijk wanneer we naar onze beoordeling kijken. Als een convertible scoort de X1-tablet 89%. Als dit apparaat wordt beoordeeld als een kantoorlaptop of subnotebook, scoort het 90%, omdat beide categorieën een grotere nadruk leggen op invoerapparaten en connectiviteit - twee categorieën waarin de ThinkPad X1-tablet uitblinkt (in het geval van connectiviteit, dankzij moderne poorten en vele beveiligingsfuncties).

Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE - 17-10-2019 v7
Andreas Osthoff

Behuizing
86 / 98 → 88%
Toetsenbord
95%
Aanwijsapparaat
93%
Aansluitmogelijkheden
73 / 75 → 98%
Gewicht
72 / 20-75 → 94%
Batterij
75%
Beeldscherm
86%
Gaming-performance
47 / 78 → 60%
Applicatie-performance
78 / 85 → 91%
Temperatuur
88%
Luidheid
94%
Audio
30 / 91 → 33%
Camera
56 / 85 → 66%
Gemiddelde
75%
88%
Convertible - Gewogen Gemiddelde

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Overzichten en testrapporten over laptops en mobieltjes > Testrapporten > Kort testrapport Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet 2018 (i5, 3K-IPS) Convertible
Andreas Osthoff, 2019-01-20 (Update: 2019-01-20)