Notebookcheck

Kort testrapport Honor 8A Smartphone

Stefan Schomberg, 👁 Daniel Schmidt, Stefanie Voigt, 30-05-2019

Een nieuw instapmodel smartphone. Een groot scherm met een inkeping in de vorm van een waterdruppel, een strak ontwerp, een efficiënte processor en een lichtgevoelige camera zijn de pluspunten van de Honor 8A volgens de fabrikant. Gezien de lage prijs van het apparaat klinkt dit bijna te mooi om waar te zijn, toch?

Honor 8A (8 Serie)
Processor
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
Grafische kaart
PowerVR GE8320
Geheugen
2048 MB 
Beeldscherm
6.09 inch 19.5:9, 1520 x 720 pixel 276 PPI, capacitief, IPS, glimmend: ja
Opslag
32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB 
, 17 GB beschikbaar
Verbindingen
1 USB 2.0, Audio Verbindingen: 3.5-mm audiopoort, Card Reader: microSD (tot 512 GB, FAT, FAT32, exFAT), 1 Vingerafdruklezer, Brightness Sensor, Sensoren: versnellingsmeter, nabijheidssensor
Netwerkmogelijkheden
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4), Bluetooth 4.2, GSM (850, 900, 1,800, 1,900), UMTS (850, 900, 1,900, 2,100), LTE, 3 (1,800 MHz), 20 (800 MHz), 1 (2,100 MHz), 5 (850 MHz), 8 (900 MHz), 38 (2,600 MHz), 40 (2,300 MHz), 41 (2,600 MHz), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Afmetingen
hoogte x breedte x diepte (in mm): 8 x 156.28 x 73.5
Batterij
3020 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Besturingssysteem
Android 9.0 Pie
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix f/1.8
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix f/2.0
Bijkomende functionaliteiten
Luidsprekers: 1, Toetsenbord: virtueel, Toetsenbordverlichting: ja, SIM tool, USB kabel, stroomadapter, 24 Maanden Garantie, head SAR: 0.43 W/kg, body SAR: 1.01 W/kg, fanless
Gewicht
150 g, Voeding: 25 g
Prijs
159 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Honor 8A
Honor 8A

Size Comparison

158.7 mm 75.6 mm 8.5 mm 180 g157.2 mm 76 mm 7.98 mm 167 g156.28 mm 73.5 mm 8 mm 150 g156.28 mm 73.5 mm 8 mm 150 g153.6 mm 73.1 mm 8.5 mm 160 g152.4 mm 73 mm 7.8 mm 150 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 939, n=417)
223 MBit/s ∼100% +238%
Huawei Y6 2019
PowerVR GE8300, Helio A22 MT6761, 32 GB eMMC Flash
69 (min: 61, max: 66) MBit/s ∼31% +5%
Honor 8A
PowerVR GE8320, Helio P35 MT6765, 32 GB eMMC Flash
66 (min: 58, max: 65) MBit/s ∼30%
Wiko View 2 Go
Adreno 505, 430, 32 GB eMMC Flash
54.7 (min: 53, max: 57) MBit/s ∼25% -17%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Adreno 506, 632, 32 GB eMMC Flash
51.4 (min: 49, max: 54) MBit/s ∼23% -22%
Honor 7A
Adreno 505, 430, 16 GB eMMC Flash
45 MBit/s ∼20% -32%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 703, n=417)
213 MBit/s ∼100% +477%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Adreno 506, 632, 32 GB eMMC Flash
55.4 (min: 52, max: 61) MBit/s ∼26% +50%
Wiko View 2 Go
Adreno 505, 430, 32 GB eMMC Flash
53 (min: 36, max: 58) MBit/s ∼25% +44%
Honor 7A
Adreno 505, 430, 16 GB eMMC Flash
46.7 MBit/s ∼22% +27%
Huawei Y6 2019
PowerVR GE8300, Helio A22 MT6761, 32 GB eMMC Flash
37.8 (min: 29, max: 46) MBit/s ∼18% +2%
Honor 8A
PowerVR GE8320, Helio P35 MT6765, 32 GB eMMC Flash
36.9 (min: 22, max: 52) MBit/s ∼17%
010203040506070Tooltip
Honor 8A Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø61.8 (58-65)
Xiaomi Redmi 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Qualcomm Adreno 506; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø51.1 (49-54)
Huawei Y6 2019 Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø64 (61-66)
Wiko View 2 Go Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Qualcomm Adreno 505; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø54.6 (53-57)
Honor 8A Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø37.1 (22-52)
Xiaomi Redmi 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Qualcomm Adreno 506; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø55.5 (52-61)
Huawei Y6 2019 Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø38 (29-46)
Wiko View 2 Go Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Qualcomm Adreno 505; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø53.2 (36-58)
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – overzicht
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – overzicht
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – stad
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – stad
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – stad
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – stad
Honor 8A - overzicht
Honor 8A - overzicht
Honor 8A - stad
Honor 8A - stad
Honor 8A - stad
Honor 8A - stad

Beeldvergelijking

Bekijk een scène en navigeer binnen het eerste beeld. Eén klik wijzigt het zoomniveau. Eén klik op het ingezoomde beeld opent het origineel in een nieuw venster. Het eerste beeld toont de verschaalde foto van het testtoestel.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
klik om beelden te laden
Honor 8A
Honor 8A
Testkaart
Testkaart
ColorChecker kleuren. Referentiekleur in de onderste helft van elk vlak
Detail van de testkaart
546
cd/m²
533
cd/m²
551
cd/m²
550
cd/m²
522
cd/m²
554
cd/m²
558
cd/m²
530
cd/m²
535
cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 558 cd/m² Gemiddelde: 542.1 cd/m² Minimum: 3.19 cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling: 94 %
Helderheid in Batterij-modus: 522 cd/m²
Contrast: 1111:1 (Zwart: 0.47 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6.1
ΔE Greyscale 6.6 | 0.64-98 Ø6.3
98.1% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.28
Honor 8A
IPS, 1520x720, 6.09
Honor 7A
IPS, 1440x720, 5.7
Xiaomi Redmi 7
IPS, 1520x720, 6.26
Huawei Y6 2019
IPS LCD, 1560x720, 6.09
Wiko View 2 Go
IPS, 1512x720, 5.93
Screen
7%
2%
7%
7%
Brightness middle
522
417
-20%
444
-15%
487
-7%
465
-11%
Brightness
542
395
-27%
441
-19%
485
-11%
462
-15%
Brightness Distribution
94
88
-6%
90
-4%
89
-5%
84
-11%
Black Level *
0.47
0.18
62%
0.45
4%
0.35
26%
0.32
32%
Contrast
1111
2317
109%
987
-11%
1391
25%
1453
31%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4
6.46
-62%
3.94
1%
4.3
-8%
4.76
-19%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
9.5
10.72
-13%
6.72
29%
10.1
-6%
7.71
19%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
6.6
5.8
12%
4.8
27%
4.1
38%
4.6
30%
Gamma
2.28 96%
2.423 91%
2.294 96%
2.09 105%
2.674 82%
CCT
7258 90%
7839 83%
7445 87%
7312 89%
6806 96%

* ... kleiner is beter

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Om de schermhelderheid te verlagen schakelen sommige laptops het backlight erg snel aan en uit. Dit gebeurt aan een dergelijk hoge frequentie dat het niet zichtbaar is voor het menselijk oog. Als de frequentie te laag is kunnen personen met gevoelige ogen geïrriteerd geraken, hoofdpijn krijgen en zelfs flickering waarnemen.
Screen flickering / PWM niet waargenomen

Ter vergelijking: 51 % van alle geteste toestellen maakten geen gebruik van PWM om de schermhelderheid te verlagen. Als het wel werd gebruikt, werd een gemiddelde van 9448 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz waargenomen.

Responstijd Scherm

De responstijden van het scherm tonen hoe snel het scherm in staat is om van één kleur naar de andere te veranderen. Trage responstijden kunnen aanleiding geven tot 'nabeelden' rond bewegende objecten of het scherm wazig maken (blur). Vooral spelers van snelle 3D-games hebben baat bij een scherm met snelle responstijden.
       Responstijd Zwart naar Wit
24.8 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd↗ 9.2 ms stijging
↘ 15.6 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde prima responstijden in onze tests maar is misschien wat te traag voor competitieve games.
Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.8 (minimum) tot 240 (maximum) ms. » 39 % van alle toestellen zijn beter.
Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd vergelijkbaar is met het gemiddelde (25.1 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.
       Responstijd 50% Grijs naar 80% Grijs
48 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd↗ 20.4 ms stijging
↘ 27.6 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde trage responstijden in onze tests en is misschien te traag voor games.
Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.9 (minimum) tot 636 (maximum) ms. » 78 % van alle toestellen zijn beter.
Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd slechter is dan het gemiddelde (40 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.
Geekbench 4.3
Compute RenderScript Score (sorteer op waarde)
Honor 8A
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
2893 Points ∼63%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
2127 Points ∼47% -26%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
3850 Points ∼84% +33%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
1607 Points ∼35% -44%
Wiko View 2 Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
2461 Points ∼54% -15%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
  (2893 - 3319, n=2)
3106 Points ∼68% +7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (663 - 21070, n=316)
4562 Points ∼100% +58%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sorteer op waarde)
Honor 8A
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
3834 Points ∼84%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
2820 Points ∼61% -26%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
4301 Points ∼94% +12%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
2354 Points ∼51% -39%
Wiko View 2 Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
2542 Points ∼55% -34%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
  (3834 - 3973, n=2)
3904 Points ∼85% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1174 - 11598, n=374)
4587 Points ∼100% +20%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sorteer op waarde)
Honor 8A
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
855 Points ∼62%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
675 Points ∼49% -21%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
1227 Points ∼90% +44%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
832 Points ∼61% -3%
Wiko View 2 Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
674 Points ∼49% -21%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
  (855 - 921, n=2)
888 Points ∼65% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (691 - 4824, n=376)
1369 Points ∼100% +60%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sorteer op waarde)
Honor 8A
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
4886 Points ∼83%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
3892 Points ∼66% -20%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
5912 Points ∼100% +21%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
5511 Points ∼93% +13%
Wiko View 2 Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
3596 Points ∼61% -26%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
  (4886 - 5346, n=2)
5116 Points ∼87% +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3227 - 11440, n=370)
5030 Points ∼85% +3%
Work performance score (sorteer op waarde)
Honor 8A
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
4045 Points ∼57%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
5109 Points ∼72% +26%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
7117 Points ∼100% +76%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
4229 Points ∼59% +5%
Wiko View 2 Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
4323 Points ∼61% +7%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
  (4045 - 7518, n=2)
5782 Points ∼81% +43%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4096 - 14439, n=538)
5516 Points ∼78% +36%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Honor 8A
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
2079 Points ∼13%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
15735 Points ∼100% +657%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
1740 Points ∼11% -16%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
  (0 - 2079, n=2)
1040 Points ∼7% -50%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2051 - 15735, n=54)
2374 Points ∼15% +14%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Honor 8A
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
355 Points ∼2%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
14536 Points ∼100% +3995%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
203 Points ∼1% -43%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
  (0 - 355, n=2)
178 Points ∼1% -50%
Average of class Smartphone
  (341 - 14536, n=54)
2359 Points ∼16% +565%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sorteer op waarde)
Honor 8A
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
435 Points ∼3%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
14786 Points ∼100% +3299%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
253 Points ∼2% -42%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
  (0 - 435, n=2)
218 Points ∼1% -50%
Average of class Smartphone
  (419 - 14786, n=57)
2051 Points ∼14% +371%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Honor 8A
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
1021 Points ∼48%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
1301 Points ∼61% +27%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
2133 Points ∼100% +109%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
876 Points ∼41% -14%
Wiko View 2 Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
1167 Points ∼55% +14%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
  (1021 - 1188, n=2)
1105 Points ∼52% +8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 4535, n=384)
1832 Points ∼86% +79%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Honor 8A
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
432 Points ∼27%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
304 Points ∼19% -30%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
469 Points ∼29% +9%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
197 Points ∼12% -54%
Wiko View 2 Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
305 Points ∼19% -29%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
  (432 - 464, n=2)
448 Points ∼28% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (76 - 8206, n=384)
1603 Points ∼100% +271%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sorteer op waarde)
Honor 8A
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
496 Points ∼33%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
366 Points ∼25% -26%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
567 Points ∼38% +14%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
238 Points ∼16% -52%
Wiko View 2 Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
365 Points ∼25% -26%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
  (496 - 537, n=2)
517 Points ∼35% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (94 - 6312, n=387)
1489 Points ∼100% +200%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Honor 8A
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
961 Points ∼45%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
1285 Points ∼60% +34%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
2147 Points ∼100% +123%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
889 Points ∼41% -7%
Wiko View 2 Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
1184 Points ∼55% +23%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
  (961 - 1190, n=2)
1076 Points ∼50% +12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 4703, n=399)
1809 Points ∼84% +88%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Honor 8A
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
695 Points ∼32%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
530 Points ∼24% -24%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
813 Points ∼37% +17%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
450 Points ∼21% -35%
Wiko View 2 Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
529 Points ∼24% -24%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
  (695 - 761, n=2)
728 Points ∼33% +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (131 - 14951, n=399)
2187 Points ∼100% +215%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sorteer op waarde)
Honor 8A
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
741 Points ∼40%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
610 Points ∼33% -18%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
943 Points ∼51% +27%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
505 Points ∼27% -32%
Wiko View 2 Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
603 Points ∼32% -19%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
  (741 - 827, n=2)
784 Points ∼42% +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (159 - 8141, n=400)
1860 Points ∼100% +151%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Honor 8A
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
998 Points ∼47%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
1232 Points ∼58% +23%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
2119 Points ∼100% +112%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
898 Points ∼42% -10%
Wiko View 2 Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
1103 Points ∼52% +11%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
  (998 - 1128, n=2)
1063 Points ∼50% +7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (486 - 4320, n=460)
1768 Points ∼83% +77%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Honor 8A
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
223 Points ∼17%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
254 Points ∼19% +14%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
424 Points ∼32% +90%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
250 Points ∼19% +12%
Wiko View 2 Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
257 Points ∼19% +15%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
  (223 - 412, n=2)
318 Points ∼24% +43%
Average of class Smartphone
  (65 - 6362, n=462)
1331 Points ∼100% +497%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sorteer op waarde)
Honor 8A
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
270 Points ∼21%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
308 Points ∼24% +14%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
516 Points ∼41% +91%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
298 Points ∼23% +10%
Wiko View 2 Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
310 Points ∼24% +15%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
  (270 - 480, n=2)
375 Points ∼30% +39%
Average of class Smartphone
  (80 - 5734, n=470)
1269 Points ∼100% +370%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Honor 8A
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
997 Points ∼47%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
1259 Points ∼59% +26%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
2132 Points ∼100% +114%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
869 Points ∼41% -13%
Wiko View 2 Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
1136 Points ∼53% +14%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
  (997 - 1121, n=2)
1059 Points ∼50% +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (512 - 4454, n=493)
1677 Points ∼79% +68%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Honor 8A
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
429 Points ∼24%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
535 Points ∼30% +25%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
807 Points ∼45% +88%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
357 Points ∼20% -17%
Wiko View 2 Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
523 Points ∼29% +22%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
  (429 - 655, n=2)
542 Points ∼30% +26%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 10008, n=493)
1804 Points ∼100% +321%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sorteer op waarde)
Honor 8A
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
491 Points ∼32%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
613 Points ∼40% +25%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
936 Points ∼60% +91%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
411 Points ∼27% -16%
Wiko View 2 Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
594 Points ∼38% +21%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
  (491 - 722, n=2)
607 Points ∼39% +24%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 7820, n=501)
1548 Points ∼100% +215%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Honor 8A
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
10689 Points ∼68%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
9249 Points ∼59% -13%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
15735 Points ∼100% +47%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
14037 Points ∼89% +31%
Wiko View 2 Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
8971 Points ∼57% -16%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
  (10689 - 16462, n=2)
13576 Points ∼86% +27%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4811 - 45072, n=652)
13700 Points ∼87% +28%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sorteer op waarde)
Honor 8A
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
7061 Points ∼35%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
9684 Points ∼48% +37%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
14536 Points ∼72% +106%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
7567 Points ∼38% +7%
Wiko View 2 Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
9686 Points ∼48% +37%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
  (7061 - 11358, n=2)
9210 Points ∼46% +30%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7573 - 162695, n=652)
20162 Points ∼100% +186%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sorteer op waarde)
Honor 8A
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
7637 Points ∼46%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
9584 Points ∼57% +25%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
14786 Points ∼89% +94%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
8431 Points ∼50% +10%
Wiko View 2 Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
9517 Points ∼57% +25%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
  (7637 - 12198, n=2)
9918 Points ∼59% +30%
Average of class Smartphone
  (8513 - 83518, n=653)
16700 Points ∼100% +119%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sorteer op waarde)
Honor 8A
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
19 fps ∼54%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
16 fps ∼45% -16%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
25 fps ∼71% +32%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
14 fps ∼40% -26%
Wiko View 2 Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
16 fps ∼45% -16%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
  (19 - 20, n=2)
19.5 fps ∼55% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (6 - 251, n=681)
35.2 fps ∼100% +85%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sorteer op waarde)
Honor 8A
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
26 fps ∼70%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
27 fps ∼73% +4%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
37 fps ∼100% +42%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
20 fps ∼54% -23%
Wiko View 2 Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
25 fps ∼68% -4%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
  (19 - 26, n=2)
22.5 fps ∼61% -13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.8 - 120, n=684)
27.1 fps ∼73% +4%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sorteer op waarde)
Honor 8A
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
9.8 fps ∼51%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
7.1 fps ∼37% -28%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
11 fps ∼57% +12%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
6.5 fps ∼34% -34%
Wiko View 2 Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
7.1 fps ∼37% -28%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
  (9.8 - 10, n=2)
9.9 fps ∼51% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.7 - 132, n=600)
19.4 fps ∼100% +98%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sorteer op waarde)
Honor 8A
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
16 fps ∼84%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
14 fps ∼74% -12%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
19 fps ∼100% +19%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
11 fps ∼58% -31%
Wiko View 2 Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
13 fps ∼68% -19%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
  (9.5 - 16, n=2)
12.8 fps ∼67% -20%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.4 - 115, n=605)
17.9 fps ∼94% +12%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Honor 8A
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
5.8 fps ∼36%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
4.6 fps ∼29% -21%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
7 fps ∼44% +21%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
4.2 fps ∼26% -28%
Wiko View 2 Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
2.5 fps ∼16% -57%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
  (5.8 - 6.2, n=2)
6 fps ∼38% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.6 - 88, n=461)
15.9 fps ∼100% +174%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Honor 8A
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
9.6 fps ∼63%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
10 fps ∼65% +4%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
14 fps ∼92% +46%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
7.6 fps ∼50% -21%
Wiko View 2 Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
9.7 fps ∼63% +1%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
  (6.3 - 9.6, n=2)
7.95 fps ∼52% -17%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.4 - 110, n=464)
15.3 fps ∼100% +59%
GFXBench
High Tier Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Honor 8A
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
0 fps ∼0%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
4.2 fps ∼47%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
2.7 fps ∼30%
Wiko View 2 Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
2.8 fps ∼32%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
  (2.3 - 2.3, n=2)
1.15 fps ∼13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.86 - 59, n=164)
8.87 fps ∼100%
2560x1440 High Tier Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Honor 8A
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
0 fps ∼0%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
1.3 fps ∼21%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
0.8 fps ∼13%
Wiko View 2 Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
0.88 fps ∼14%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
  (1.4 - 1.4, n=2)
0.7 fps ∼11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.26 - 31, n=164)
6.16 fps ∼100%
Normal Tier Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Honor 8A
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
6.8 fps ∼51%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
7 fps ∼52% +3%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
2.3 fps ∼17% -66%
Wiko View 2 Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
4.7 fps ∼35% -31%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
  (3.6 - 6.8, n=2)
5.2 fps ∼39% -24%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.8 - 59, n=165)
13.4 fps ∼100% +97%
1920x1080 Normal Tier Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Honor 8A
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
3.8 fps ∼26%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
3.9 fps ∼27% +3%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
4.2 fps ∼29% +11%
Wiko View 2 Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
2.6 fps ∼18% -32%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
  (3.8 - 3.8, n=2)
3.8 fps ∼26% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.94 - 63, n=165)
14.7 fps ∼100% +287%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Honor 8A
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
2.6 fps ∼24%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
2.6 fps ∼24% 0%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
3.9 fps ∼36% +50%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
2 fps ∼19% -23%
Wiko View 2 Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
2.6 fps ∼24% 0%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
  (2.6 - 2.9, n=2)
2.75 fps ∼26% +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.89 - 54, n=390)
10.7 fps ∼100% +312%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Honor 8A
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
3.8 fps ∼39%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
5.4 fps ∼56% +42%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
7.8 fps ∼80% +105%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
3.1 fps ∼32% -18%
Wiko View 2 Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
5 fps ∼52% +32%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
  (3 - 3.8, n=2)
3.4 fps ∼35% -11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.6 - 58, n=394)
9.7 fps ∼100% +155%
Basemark GPU
1920x1080 OpenGL Medium Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Honor 8A
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
fps ∼0%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
fps ∼0%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
 
0 fps ∼0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.53 - 37.4, n=61)
15.1 fps ∼100%
Vulkan Medium Native (sorteer op waarde)
Honor 8A
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
fps ∼0%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
fps ∼0%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
 
0 fps ∼0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.91 - 36.2, n=56)
12.1 fps ∼100%
1920x1080 Vulkan Medium Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Honor 8A
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
fps ∼0%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
fps ∼0%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
 
0 fps ∼0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.2 - 38.6, n=56)
14.3 fps ∼100%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sorteer op waarde)
Honor 8A
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
Points ∼0%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
59990 Points ∼46%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
102781 Points ∼78%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
64157 Points ∼49%
Wiko View 2 Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
56793 Points ∼43%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
  (85742 - 85742, n=2)
42871 Points ∼33%
Average of class Smartphone
  (52607 - 398720, n=282)
131480 Points ∼100%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sorteer op waarde)
Honor 8A
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
816 Points ∼76%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
705 Points ∼66% -14%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
1071 Points ∼100% +31%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
785 Points ∼73% -4%
Wiko View 2 Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
673 Points ∼63% -18%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
  (680 - 816, n=2)
748 Points ∼70% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7 - 1731, n=613)
744 Points ∼69% -9%
Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Honor 8A
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
792 Points ∼40%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
739 Points ∼38% -7%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
1072 Points ∼55% +35%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
470 Points ∼24% -41%
Wiko View 2 Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
741 Points ∼38% -6%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
  (792 - 793, n=2)
793 Points ∼40% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (18 - 15969, n=613)
1960 Points ∼100% +147%
Memory (sorteer op waarde)
Honor 8A
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
1366 Points ∼78%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
1209 Points ∼69% -11%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
1758 Points ∼100% +29%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
1458 Points ∼83% +7%
Wiko View 2 Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
884 Points ∼50% -35%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
  (1219 - 1366, n=2)
1293 Points ∼74% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (21 - 7500, n=613)
1465 Points ∼83% +7%
System (sorteer op waarde)
Honor 8A
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
2533 Points ∼62%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
1962 Points ∼48% -23%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
4090 Points ∼100% +61%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
1755 Points ∼43% -31%
Wiko View 2 Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
1808 Points ∼44% -29%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
  (2487 - 2533, n=2)
2510 Points ∼61% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (369 - 12202, n=613)
2881 Points ∼70% +14%
Overall (sorteer op waarde)
Honor 8A
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
1223 Points ∼72%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
1055 Points ∼62% -14%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
1695 Points ∼100% +39%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
986 Points ∼58% -19%
Wiko View 2 Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
945 Points ∼56% -23%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
  (1131 - 1223, n=2)
1177 Points ∼69% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (150 - 6097, n=617)
1432 Points ∼84% +17%
Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sorteer op waarde)
Honor 8A
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
133 Points ∼19%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
 
133 Points ∼19% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (35 - 2754, n=103)
703 Points ∼100% +429%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (12.9 - 108, n=89)
30.7 Points ∼100% +126%
Xiaomi Redmi 7 (Chrome 73)
26.9 Points ∼88% +98%
Huawei Y6 2019
15.326 Points ∼50% +13%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 (13.6 - 14.5, n=2)
14 Points ∼46% +3%
Honor 8A
13.6 Points ∼44%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (6.42 - 123, n=80)
34.5 runs/min ∼100% +133%
Xiaomi Redmi 7 (Chome 73)
27.44 runs/min ∼80% +85%
Huawei Y6 2019 (Chrome)
15.69 runs/min ∼45% +6%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 (14.8 - 16, n=2)
15.4 runs/min ∼45% +4%
Honor 8A (Chrome)
14.8 runs/min ∼43%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 161, n=144)
63.1 Points ∼100% +118%
Xiaomi Redmi 7 (Chrome 73)
58 Points ∼92% +100%
Huawei Y6 2019
35 Points ∼55% +21%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 (29 - 31, n=2)
30 Points ∼48% +3%
Honor 8A (Chrome)
29 Points ∼46%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Redmi 7 (Chrome 73)
8258 Points ∼100% +90%
Average of class Smartphone (1994 - 43280, n=674)
6335 Points ∼77% +46%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 (4347 - 4707, n=2)
4527 Points ∼55% +4%
Huawei Y6 2019 (Chrome)
4437 Points ∼54% +2%
Honor 8A (Chrome)
4347 Points ∼53%
Honor 7A (Chrome 67)
3389 Points ∼41% -22%
Wiko View 2 Go (Chrome 71)
3089 Points ∼37% -29%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Honor 7A (Chrome 67)
14709 ms * ∼100% -30%
Wiko View 2 Go (Chrome 71)
13373 ms * ∼91% -18%
Honor 8A (Chrome)
11323 ms * ∼77%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 (10236 - 11323, n=2)
10779 ms * ∼73% +5%
Average of class Smartphone (603 - 59466, n=694)
10740 ms * ∼73% +5%
Huawei Y6 2019
10198 ms * ∼69% +10%
Xiaomi Redmi 7 (Chrome 73)
4856.4 ms * ∼33% +57%

* ... kleiner is beter

Honor 8AHonor 7A Xiaomi Redmi 7Huawei Y6 2019Average 32 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-16%
3%
5%
-12%
-7%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
61.83
65.4 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
6%
63.3 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
2%
64.45 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
4%
49.8 (3.4 - 87.1, n=136)
-19%
48.7 (9.5 - 87.1, n=407)
-21%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
81.92
84.9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
4%
85.9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
5%
83.16 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
2%
68.5 (8.2 - 96.5, n=136)
-16%
66.8 (8.1 - 96.5, n=407)
-18%
Random Write 4KB
15
9.4
-37%
14.4
-4%
15
0%
18.4 (0.75 - 77.3, n=179)
23%
20.4 (0.14 - 250, n=722)
36%
Random Read 4KB
61
39.2
-36%
73.6
21%
69
13%
38.6 (3.59 - 117, n=179)
-37%
45.3 (1.59 - 175, n=722)
-26%
Sequential Write 256KB
104
72.5
-30%
84.7
-19%
107.78
4%
94.7 (14.8 - 189, n=179)
-9%
92.9 (2.99 - 503, n=722)
-11%
Sequential Read 256KB
265
254.8
-4%
298
12%
279.26
5%
235 (25.8 - 452, n=179)
-11%
261 (12.1 - 1468, n=722)
-2%
GameBench PUBG (niedrige Grafikeinstellungen)
010203040Tooltip
; 0.12.0: Ø20.6 (1-33)
GameBench Asphalt 9 (niedrige Grafikeinstellungen)
01020Tooltip
; 1.5.4a: Ø10 (5-17)
Gamebench Shadow Fight 3 (niedrige Grafikeinstellungen)
010203040506070Tooltip
; 1.18.3: Ø43 (1-61)
Max. Belasting
 32.4 °C32 °C34.6 °C 
 31.8 °C31.7 °C32.7 °C 
 30.8 °C30.6 °C33 °C 
Maximum: 34.6 °C
Gemiddelde: 32.2 °C
28.8 °C29.4 °C30.2 °C
29 °C29.5 °C31.7 °C
29.6 °C29.5 °C31 °C
Maximum: 31.7 °C
Gemiddelde: 29.9 °C
Stroomadapter (max.)  31.4 °C | Kamertemperatuur 22 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 32.2 °C / 90 F, compared to the average of 33.1 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 34.6 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 35.5 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 31.7 °C / 89 F, compared to the average of 34.1 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.6 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 33.1 °C / 92 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2032.536.42531.932.33122.325.44021.723.65029.237.56326.723.98020.323.910020.525.7125233816015.653.820017.852.925016.357.831515.462.640015.964.150015.864.363013.368.580014.168.6100014.172.812501477160013.577.2200013.480.3250013.979.6315014.279.8400013.979.3500014.679.1630014.276.2800014.776.5100001572.31250014.961.21600015.347.3SPL26.489.4N0.877.4median 14.7median 68.6Delta0.91142.646.338.438.734.231.337.326.53031.826.62823.222.421.221.12121.616.326.416.636.715.841.213.546.312.251.61252.611.75510.558.79.661.69.563.6965.38.567.48.569.28.371.38.269.38.167.68.165.18.162.38.264.48.353.38.235.265.451.721.959.978.619.17.10.31239median 9.5median 58.72.812.1hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseHonor 8AHonor 7A
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Honor 8A audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.9% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 16% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 75% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 44% of all tested devices were better, 9% similar, 47% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Honor 7A audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.4% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 56% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 73% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 21% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Stroomgebruik
Uit / Standbydarklight 0.01 / 0.14 Watt
Inactiefdarkmidlight 0.73 / 2.07 / 2.14 Watt
Belasting midlight 4.3 / 5.96 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Honor 8A
3020 mAh
Honor 7A
3000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi 7
4000 mAh
Huawei Y6 2019
3020 mAh
Wiko View 2 Go
4000 mAh
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-17%
2%
21%
2%
2%
2%
Idle Minimum *
0.73
1.3
-78%
1
-37%
0.59
19%
0.8
-10%
0.835 (0.73 - 0.94, n=2)
-14%
0.879 (0.2 - 3.4, n=750)
-20%
Idle Average *
2.07
1.6
23%
1.7
18%
1.94
6%
2
3%
2.09 (2.07 - 2.1, n=2)
-1%
1.733 (0.6 - 6.2, n=749)
16%
Idle Maximum *
2.14
2.9
-36%
2.1
2%
1.96
8%
2.3
-7%
2.14 (2.13 - 2.14, n=2)
-0%
2.02 (0.74 - 6.6, n=750)
6%
Load Average *
4.3
3.7
14%
3.3
23%
2.82
34%
3.6
16%
3.6 (2.9 - 4.3, n=2)
16%
4.06 (0.8 - 10.8, n=744)
6%
Load Maximum *
5.96
6.4
-7%
5.6
6%
3.57
40%
5.4
9%
5.34 (4.71 - 5.96, n=2)
10%
5.88 (1.2 - 14.2, n=744)
1%

* ... kleiner is beter

Batterijduur
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
13h 48.8min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
15h 17min
Belast (maximale helderheid)
5h 01min
Honor 8A
3020 mAh
Honor 7A
3000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi 7
4000 mAh
Huawei Y6 2019
3020 mAh
Wiko View 2 Go
4000 mAh
Batterijduur
-21%
-4%
-14%
-11%
Reader / Idle
1489
H.264
917
902
-2%
805
-12%
WiFi v1.3
828.8
657
-21%
848
2%
732.1
-12%
734
-11%
Load
301
268
-11%
249
-17%

Pro

+ compact
+ degelijke systeemprestaties
+ goede batterij
+ moderne software
+ vingerafdruksensor

Contra

- Micro-USB
- niet geschikt voor gamers
Getest: Honor 8A.
Getest: Honor 8A.

Voor het volledige, Engelse testrapport, klik hier.

De Honor 7A was al best goed, en de Honor 8A is zelfs nog beter. Het ontwerp is absoluut een kwestie van smaak, en we hadden liever een hoogwaardigere touch en feel gehad. Maar gezien de prijs van de Honor 8A hebben we er geen problemen mee. Het beeldscherm is goed en veel helderder dan vorig jaar, het interne opslaggeheugen is verdubbeld in capaciteit en ook de algemene prestaties zijn verbeterd.

De Honor 8A is een smartphone op instapniveau zonder echte gebreken. Gezien de bijna identieke prijs biedt het meer dan zijn meest prominente interne concurrent, de Huawei Y6 (2019).

De camera zal naar alle waarschijnlijkheid voldoende zijn voor de meeste gebruikers - als je meer wilt, moet je meer betalen, zo simpel is het. Over het algemeen is de Honor 8A een geweldige smartphone voor minder dan $200. Huawei's bruine Y6 biedt misschien een slanker ontwerp, maar mist dan wel weer een vingerafdruklezer.

Honor 8A - 23-05-2019 v6
Stefan Schomberg

Behuizing
76%
Toetsenbord
65 / 75 → 87%
Aanwijsapparaat
78%
Aansluitmogelijkheden
40 / 60 → 67%
Gewicht
92%
Batterij
96%
Beeldscherm
83%
Gaming-performance
21 / 63 → 33%
Applicatie-performance
49 / 70 → 70%
Temperatuur
94%
Luidheid
100%
Audio
61 / 91 → 67%
Camera
47%
Gemiddelde
69%
79%
Smartphone - Gewogen Gemiddelde

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Overzichten en testrapporten over laptops en mobieltjes > Testrapporten > Kort testrapport Honor 8A Smartphone
Stefan Schomberg, 2019-05-30 (Update: 2019-05-30)