Kort testrapport Dell Latitude 3590: Zakelijke laptop met grote fouten
Zeker geen schot in de roos. Dell heeft de nieuwste versie van zijn kantoor- en businessreeks 3000 op de markt geïntroduceerd en voegt enkele nieuwe problemen toe aan de al bekende zwakke punten van dit assortiment. Niet alleen is het beeldscherm een probleem met deze nieuwste versie, waarmee we al ontevreden zouden zijn bij een €400 budget-laptop, maar spelen er ook andere technische problemen. Afgezien van dit gebrek heeft het apparaat een zeer goede batterijlevensduur. UPDATE 08.07.2019: De nieuwe BIOS-versie 1.9.8 verbetert de problemen met de hitte en geluidsproductie.
Size Comparison
Top 10 Testrapporten
» Top 10 Multimedia Notebooks
» Top 10 Gaming-Notebooks
» Top 10 Budget Office/Business-Notebooks
» Top 10 Premium Office/Business-Notebooks
» Top 10 Workstation-Laptops
» Top 10 Lichtgewicht Gaming-Notebooks
» Top 10 Subnotebooks
» Top 10 Smartphones tot €120
» Top 10 Smartphones tot €300
» Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Top 10 Convertibles
» Top 10 Tablets
» Top 10 Windows-Tablets
» Top 10 Phablets (>5.5-inch)
» Top 10 Smartphones
» Top 10 Smartphones (≤5-inch)
» Best Geteste Notebook Beeldschermen
» Top 10 Notebooks tot € 1.000De beste notebookbeeldschermen zoals getest door Notebookcheck
» Top 10 Notebooks tot €500
» Top 10 Notebooks tot €300
| SDCardreader Transfer Speed | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Dell Latitude 14 5495 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E590-20NB0012GE (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) | |
| Average of class Office (10.2 - 191, n=274) | |
| Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Dell Latitude 3590 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Dell Latitude 14 5495 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E590-20NB0012GE (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) | |
| Average of class Office (9.5 - 255, n=249) | |
| Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Dell Latitude 3590 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Networking | |
| iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E590-20NB0012GE | |
| Average of class Office (5 - 688, n=221) | |
| Dell Latitude 14 5495 | |
| Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110 | |
| Dell Latitude 3590 | |
| iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E590-20NB0012GE | |
| Dell Latitude 3590 | |
| Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110 | |
| Dell Latitude 14 5495 | |
| Average of class Office (34 - 688, n=221) | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Helderheidsverdeling: 91 %
Helderheid in Batterij-modus: 212 cd/m²
Contrast: 558:1 (Zwart: 0.385 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 10.31 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6, calibrated: 3.88
ΔE Greyscale 11.84 | 0.64-98 Ø6.3
61% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 39% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.67
| Dell Latitude 3590 BOE0802 / NT15N41 / Dell: M9P74, , 1920x1080, 15.6 | Lenovo ThinkPad E590-20NB0012GE Lenovo B156HAN02.1, , 1920x1080, 15.6 | Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110 TOS508F, , 1920x1080, 15.6 | Dell Latitude 14 5495 CMN14C9, , 1920x1080, 14 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Response Times | -94% | 2581% | 3250% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 41 (22, 19) | 47.2 (23.6, 23.6) -15% | 44 (23, 21) -7% | 41 (24, 17) -0% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 12 (8, 4) | 32.8 (19.6, 13.2) -173% | 30 (19, 11) -150% | 30 (19, 11) -150% |
| PWM Frequency | 250 (90) | 20000 (90) 7900% | 25000 (30) 9900% | |
| Screen | 33% | 34% | 29% | |
| Brightness middle | 215 | 284 32% | 290 35% | 212 -1% |
| Brightness | 214 | 272 27% | 249 16% | 200 -7% |
| Brightness Distribution | 91 | 92 1% | 78 -14% | 89 -2% |
| Black Level * | 0.385 | 0.21 45% | 0.38 1% | 0.23 40% |
| Contrast | 558 | 1352 142% | 763 37% | 922 65% |
| Colorchecker DeltaE2000 * | 10.31 | 5.3 49% | 4.35 58% | 4.34 58% |
| Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. * | 20.44 | 18.9 8% | 11.06 46% | 9.01 56% |
| Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated * | 3.88 | 4.4 -13% | ||
| Greyscale DeltaE2000 * | 11.84 | 3.2 73% | 3.01 75% | 2.81 76% |
| Gamma | 2.67 82% | 2.41 91% | 2.44 90% | 2.22 99% |
| CCT | 13398 49% | 6736 96% | 7198 90% | 6286 103% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 39 | 37.9 -3% | 56 44% | 39 0% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 61 | 59.7 -2% | 86 41% | 61 0% |
| Totaal Gemiddelde (Programma / Instellingen) | -31% /
13% | 1308% /
622% | 1640% /
772% |
* ... kleiner is beter
Responstijd Scherm
| ↔ Responstijd Zwart naar Wit | ||
|---|---|---|
| 12 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd | ↗ 8 ms stijging |  |
| ↘ 4 ms daling | ||
| Het scherm vertoonde prima responstijden in onze tests maar is misschien wat te traag voor competitieve games. Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.8 (minimum) tot 240 (maximum) ms. » 12 % van alle toestellen zijn beter. Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd beter is dan het gemiddelde (25 ms) van alle geteste toestellen. | ||
| ↔ Responstijd 50% Grijs naar 80% Grijs | ||
| 41 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd | ↗ 22 ms stijging |  |
| ↘ 19 ms daling | ||
| Het scherm vertoonde trage responstijden in onze tests en is misschien te traag voor games. Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.9 (minimum) tot 636 (maximum) ms. » 51 % van alle toestellen zijn beter. Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd vergelijkbaar is met het gemiddelde (39.7 ms) van alle geteste toestellen. | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM waargenomen | 250 Hz | ≤ 90 % helderheid instelling |  |
Het backlight van het scherm flikkert aan 250 Hz (hoogstwaarschijnlijk met PWM - Pulse-Width Modulation) aan een helderheid van 90 % en lager. Boven deze helderheid zou er geen flickering / PWM mogen optreden. De frequentie van 250 Hz is redelijk laag en de meeste mensen die gevoelig zijn aan flickering kunnen dit dus waarnemen of geïrriteerde ogen krijgen (gebruikmakend van de vermelde helderheid en lager). Ter vergelijking: 51 % van alle geteste toestellen maakten geen gebruik van PWM om de schermhelderheid te verlagen. Als het wel werd gebruikt, werd een gemiddelde van 9409 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz waargenomen. | |||
| Cinebench R15 | |
| CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E590-20NB0012GE | |
| Dell Latitude 14 5495 | |
| Dell Latitude 3590 | |
| Average Intel Core i5-8250U (81 - 147, n=94) | |
| Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110 | |
| Average of class Office (20 - 199, n=531) | |
| CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Dell Latitude 14 5495 | |
| Average Intel Core i5-8250U (320 - 730, n=98) | |
| Dell Latitude 3590 | |
| Dell Latitude 3590 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E590-20NB0012GE | |
| Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110 | |
| Average of class Office (36 - 1050, n=538) | |
| PCMark 10 | |
| Digital Content Creation | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E590-20NB0012GE | |
| Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110 | |
| Average Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel UHD Graphics 620 (2688 - 3082, n=64) | |
| Dell Latitude 3590 | |
| Average of class Office (320 - 3884, n=147) | |
| Dell Latitude 14 5495 | |
| Productivity | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E590-20NB0012GE | |
| Average Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel UHD Graphics 620 (3851 - 6653, n=64) | |
| Dell Latitude 3590 | |
| Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110 | |
| Average of class Office (1266 - 7964, n=147) | |
| Dell Latitude 14 5495 | |
| Essentials | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E590-20NB0012GE | |
| Dell Latitude 3590 | |
| Average Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel UHD Graphics 620 (5855 - 9289, n=64) | |
| Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110 | |
| Average of class Office (2683 - 9790, n=147) | |
| Dell Latitude 14 5495 | |
| Score | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E590-20NB0012GE | |
| Dell Latitude 3590 | |
| Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110 | |
| Average Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel UHD Graphics 620 (3407 - 4081, n=64) | |
| Average of class Office (803 - 4597, n=148) | |
| Dell Latitude 14 5495 | |
| PCMark 8 | |
| Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E590-20NB0012GE | |
| Dell Latitude 3590 | |
| Average Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel UHD Graphics 620 (2699 - 5106, n=56) | |
| Average of class Office (1226 - 5428, n=344) | |
| Dell Latitude 14 5495 | |
| Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E590-20NB0012GE | |
| Average Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel UHD Graphics 620 (2986 - 4458, n=67) | |
| Dell Latitude 3590 | |
| Dell Latitude 14 5495 | |
| Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110 | |
| Average of class Office (1169 - 4770, n=403) | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3532 punten | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4727 punten | |
Help | ||
| Dell Latitude 3590 Samsung SSD PM871b MZ7LN256HAJQ | Lenovo ThinkPad E590-20NB0012GE Toshiba KBG30ZMT256G | Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110 Samsung SSD PM871b MZNLN256HAJQ | Dell Latitude 14 5495 Intel SSDSCKKF256G8 | Average Samsung SSD PM871b MZ7LN256HAJQ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | 61% | -4% | -21% | -5% | |
| Write 4K | 79.52 | 111.2 40% | 80.14 1% | 48.45 -39% | 83.6 (77.1 - 94.4, n=3) 5% |
| Read 4K | 32.72 | 49.01 50% | 32.05 -2% | 25.11 -23% | 32.4 (32 - 32.7, n=3) -1% |
| Write Seq | 472.5 | 585.8 24% | 505.4 7% | 341.2 -28% | 481 (473 - 488, n=3) 2% |
| Read Seq | 503.5 | 783.1 56% | 527.9 5% | 520.6 3% | 515 (504 - 524, n=3) 2% |
| Write 4K Q32T1 | 322.6 | 263 -18% | 204.9 -36% | 202 -37% | 229 (132 - 323, n=3) -29% |
| Read 4K Q32T1 | 249.9 | 481.5 93% | 226.6 -9% | 243.5 -3% | 216 (145 - 254, n=3) -14% |
| Write Seq Q32T1 | 530.5 | 784.2 48% | 532.7 0% | 320.8 -40% | 511 (497 - 531, n=3) -4% |
| Read Seq Q32T1 | 544.3 | 1602 194% | 550.7 1% | 555.2 2% | 541 (540 - 544, n=3) -1% |
| Write 4K Q8T8 | 247.5 | ||||
| Read 4K Q8T8 | 253.4 | ||||
| AS SSD | -2% | -15% | -45% | -17% | |
| Copy Game MB/s | 404.95 | 260.04 | 191 (185 - 197, n=2) | ||
| Copy Program MB/s | 165.41 | 152.14 | 106 (84.5 - 128, n=2) | ||
| Copy ISO MB/s | 532.41 | 441.25 | 278 (272 - 283, n=2) | ||
| Score Total | 1060 | 1706 61% | 971 -8% | 751 -29% | 852 (628 - 1060, n=3) -20% |
| Score Write | 364 | 478 31% | 284 -22% | 288 -21% | 324 (264 - 364, n=3) -11% |
| Score Read | 457 | 822 80% | 448 -2% | 309 -32% | 344 (234 - 457, n=3) -25% |
| Access Time Write * | 0.042 | 0.228 -443% | 0.046 -10% | 0.101 -140% | 0.06 (0.042 - 0.077, n=3) -43% |
| Access Time Read * | 0.06 | 0.162 -170% | 0.129 -115% | 0.128 -113% | 0.08 (0.06 - 0.095, n=3) -33% |
| 4K-64 Write | 247.71 | 314.07 27% | 156.1 -37% | 225.18 -9% | 213 (156 - 248, n=3) -14% |
| 4K-64 Read | 372.48 | 642.76 73% | 366.77 -2% | 238.42 -36% | 264 (157 - 372, n=3) -29% |
| 4K Write | 79.85 | 90.27 13% | 78.8 -1% | 34.58 -57% | 67.6 (59.8 - 79.9, n=3) -15% |
| 4K Read | 34.65 | 47.61 37% | 30.36 -12% | 19.76 -43% | 30.6 (28 - 34.7, n=3) -12% |
| Seq Write | 361.68 | 735.36 103% | 493.27 36% | 286.49 -21% | 430 (362 - 472, n=3) 19% |
| Seq Read | 498.72 | 1316 164% | 512.88 3% | 507.15 2% | 494 (490 - 499, n=3) -1% |
| Totaal Gemiddelde (Programma / Instellingen) | 30% /
24% | -10% /
-11% | -33% /
-35% | -11% /
-12% |
* ... kleiner is beter
| 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E590-20NB0012GE | |
| Dell Latitude 14 5495 | |
| Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (1235 - 2006, n=165) | |
| Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110 | |
| Dell Latitude 3590 | |
| Average of class Office (185 - 5332, n=653) | |
| 3DMark | |
| 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E590-20NB0012GE | |
| Dell Latitude 14 5495 | |
| Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (557 - 1401, n=134) | |
| Dell Latitude 3590 | |
| Average of class Office (138 - 4109, n=472) | |
| 1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E590-20NB0012GE | |
| Dell Latitude 14 5495 | |
| Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (6910 - 11436, n=152) | |
| Dell Latitude 3590 | |
| Average of class Office (1208 - 27117, n=518) | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 1778 punten | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 6006 punten | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 968 punten | |
Help | ||
| BioShock Infinite | |
| 1366x768 Medium Preset | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E590-20NB0012GE | |
| Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (11.5 - 45.5, n=151) | |
| Average of class Office (5.6 - 145, n=363) | |
| Dell Latitude 3590 | |
| Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110 | |
| 1280x720 Very Low Preset | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E590-20NB0012GE | |
| Dell Latitude 14 5495 | |
| Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (18.3 - 90.2, n=151) | |
| Average of class Office (12.2 - 208, n=367) | |
| Dell Latitude 3590 | |
| Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110 | |
| Rise of the Tomb Raider - 1024x768 Lowest Preset | |
| Dell Latitude 14 5495 | |
| Average of class Office (6.2 - 111, n=107) | |
| Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (10.4 - 111, n=75) | |
| Dell Latitude 3590 | |
| lage | gem. | hoge | ultra | ||
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 52.4 | 29.5 | fps | ||
| Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 18.7 | fps | |||
| Farming Simulator 19 (2018) | 54.8 | 20.8 | fps |
Geluidsniveau
| Onbelast |
| 30.6 / 31.9 / 31.9 dB (A) |
| Belasting |
| 39 / 39.1 dB (A) |
 | ||
30 dB stil 40 dB(A) hoorbaar 50 dB(A) luid |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm afstand) environment noise: 30.6 dB(A) | ||
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.6 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 37.5 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 36.4 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.8 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 29.4 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 27.7 °C / 81.9 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.1 °C / 82.6 F (+0.4 °C / 0.7 F).
Dell Latitude 3590 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (72.46 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 67% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 24% worse
» The best had a delta of 8%, average was 21%, worst was 51%
Compared to all devices tested
» 60% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 32% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110 audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (71.84 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.1% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.8% higher than median
(-) | mids are not linear (16.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (32.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 95% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 3% worse
» The best had a delta of 8%, average was 21%, worst was 51%
Compared to all devices tested
» 93% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 5% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Dell Latitude 14 5495 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76.07 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 15% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 81% worse
» The best had a delta of 8%, average was 21%, worst was 51%
Compared to all devices tested
» 18% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 79% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
| Uit / Standby | 0.27 / 0.75 Watt |
| Inactief | 4.3 / 7.2 / 9.8 Watt |
| Belasting |
38 / 24 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Dell Latitude 3590 8250U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung SSD PM871b MZ7LN256HAJQ, TN LED, 1920x1080, 15.6 | Lenovo ThinkPad E590-20NB0012GE 8565U, Radeon RX 550X (Laptop), Toshiba KBG30ZMT256G, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6 | Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110 8250U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung SSD PM871b MZNLN256HAJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6 | Dell Latitude 14 5495 2700U, Vega 10, Intel SSDSCKKF256G8, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 14 | Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 | Average of class Office | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -43% | -3% | -4% | |||
| Idle Minimum * | 4.3 | 3.48 19% | 3.8 12% | 4.3 -0% | ||
| Idle Average * | 7.2 | 7.2 -0% | 7.7 -7% | 6.6 8% | ||
| Idle Maximum * | 9.8 | 10.2 -4% | 9.3 5% | 7.7 21% | ||
| Load Average * | 38 | 59.6 -57% | 31 18% | 32 16% | ||
| Load Maximum * | 24 | 65.1 -171% | 34.6 -44% | 40 -67% | ||
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 49 |
* ... kleiner is beter
| Dell Latitude 3590 8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 56 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad E590-20NB0012GE 8565U, Radeon RX 550X (Laptop), 45 Wh | Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110 8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 45 Wh | Dell Latitude 14 5495 2700U, Vega 10, 61 Wh | Average of class Office | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Batterijduur | -15% | -47% | 3% | -24% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1209 | 1133 -6% | 1089 -10% | ||
| H.264 | 618 | 541 -12% | 708 15% | ||
| WiFi v1.3 | 544 | 423 -22% | 291 -47% | 562 3% | 415 (105 - 964, n=350) -24% |
| Load | 129 | 105 -19% | 136 5% |
Pro
Contra
Voor het volledige, Engelse testrapport, klik hier.
De positieve kant van deze mislukte poging op een kantoor notebook met zakelijke ambities zijn de echt zeer goede invoerapparaten, evenals een zeer goede batterijlevensduur. In die zin maakt de Dell Latitude 15 3590 zijn professionele ambities waar. Dit geldt ook voor het meegeleverde beveiligingspakket en de bedrijfsgeoriënteerde connectiviteitsopties. De behuizing maakt ook indruk.
Wat absoluut onaanvaardbaar is voor een €800-kostend apparaat is echter het beeldscherm dat op elk denkbaar aspect verschrikkelijk presteert. Het is een TN-type beeldscherm met vreselijke kijkhoeken, ellendig contrast, een zware blauwe tint en een zeer laag kleurbereik. Daarbij komt nog de slechte kaartlezer, de aanzienlijk slechte WLAN-prestaties en de ventilator, die constant op de achtergrond zoemt, ook wanneer de laptop helemaal niet wordt belast. Dit is ongetwijfeld te danken aan een slechte besturing van de ventilator, wat resulteert in een absoluut chaotisch kloksnelheidgedrag van de processor.
De problemen met de ventilator en bijbehorende prestatieproblemen nemen een prominente plek in. We kunnen alleen maar hopen dat een toekomstige BIOS-update deze problemen zal verbeteren - tot die tijd kunnen we deze laptop niet aanbevelen.
UPDATE 08.07.2019: Na het installeren van de nieuwe BIOS-versie 1.9.8 is het gedrag van de ventilator en kloksnelheid normaler en veel verbeterd, en we hebben onze score voor deze laptop hierdoor verhoogd.
Dell Latitude 3590 - 08-07-2019 v6(old)
Sven Kloevekorn