Kort testrapport Asus VivoBook Pro 15 (i7-7700HQ, GTX 1050) Laptop

Name: Kort testrapport Asus VivoBook Pro 15 (i7-7700HQ, GTX 1050) Laptop
Item: Asus VivoBook Pro 15 N580VD-DM028T
Rating: 81
Author: Christian Hintze

Christian Hintze, 15-10-2017

Business Geforce Kaby Lake Laptop / Notebook Windows

Stijlvol en elegant, maar nog niet foutloos. De nieuwe VivoBook is een de betaalbare versie van de ZenBook serie. Is het een succes of heeft Asus te veel bezuinigd?

Testtoestel voorzien door notebooksbilliger.de

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Size Comparison

Acer Aspire VX15 VX5-591G-589S HP Pavilion 15t-X7P42AV Gigabyte Sabre 15G Asus VivoBook Pro 15 N580VD-DM028T Asus ZenBook Pro UX550VD Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD)

Linkerkant: stroomaansluiting, LAN, USB-A 3.0, HDMI, USB-C 3.1

Rechterkant: Kensington, 2x USB-A, audiopoort, SD-kaartlezer, status LED's

Top 10 Testrapporten

» Top 10 Multimedia Notebooks
» Top 10 Gaming-Notebooks
» Top 10 Budget Office/Business-Notebooks
» Top 10 Premium Office/Business-Notebooks
» Top 10 Workstation-Laptops
» Top 10 Lichtgewicht Gaming-Notebooks
» Top 10 Subnotebooks
» Top 10 Smartphones tot €120
» Top 10 Smartphones tot €300
» Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Top 10 Convertibles
» Top 10 Tablets
» Top 10 Windows-Tablets
» Top 10 Phablets (>5.5-inch)
» Top 10 Smartphones
» Top 10 Smartphones (≤5-inch)
» Best Geteste Notebook Beeldschermen
» Top 10 Notebooks tot € 1.000 Notebookcheck's Beste Notebook-Beeldschermen
» Top 10 Notebooks tot €500
» Top 10 Notebooks tot €300

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter	674 MBit/s ∼100% +65%
Acer Aspire VX15 VX5-591G-589S Qualcomm/Atheros QCA6174	660 MBit/s ∼98% +61%
HP Pavilion 15t-X7P42AV Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265	635 MBit/s ∼94% +55%
Asus ZenBook Pro UX550VD Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265	594 MBit/s ∼88% +45%
Asus VivoBook Pro 15 N580VD-DM028T Intel 8265 Tri-Band WiFi (Oak Peak) Network Adapter	409 MBit/s ∼61%
Gigabyte Sabre 15G Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3168	240 MBit/s ∼36% -41%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Asus VivoBook Pro 15 N580VD-DM028T Intel 8265 Tri-Band WiFi (Oak Peak) Network Adapter	661 MBit/s ∼100%
Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter	641 MBit/s ∼97% -3%
Acer Aspire VX15 VX5-591G-589S Qualcomm/Atheros QCA6174	632 MBit/s ∼96% -4%
HP Pavilion 15t-X7P42AV Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265	532 MBit/s ∼80% -20%
Asus ZenBook Pro UX550VD Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265	377 MBit/s ∼57% -43%
Gigabyte Sabre 15G Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3168	319 MBit/s ∼48% -52%


220 cd/m²	222 cd/m²	217 cd/m²
233 cd/m²	247 cd/m²	236 cd/m²
209 cd/m²	211 cd/m²	220 cd/m²

Helderheidsverdeling

X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 247 cd/m² Gemiddelde: 223.9 cd/m² Minimum: 13.6 cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling: 85 %
Helderheid in Batterij-modus: 246 cd/m²
Contrast: 515:1 (Zwart: 0.48 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.39 | 0.8-29.43 Ø6.3
ΔE Greyscale 5.25 | 0.64-98 Ø6.6
60% sRGB (Argyll) 38% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll)
Gamma: 2.48

ICC-profiel (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Asus VivoBook Pro 15 N580VD-DM028T INNOLUX N156HGA-EAB, , 1920x1080, 15.6	Asus ZenBook Pro UX550VD CMN15E8 (N156HCE-EN1), , 1920x1080, 15.6	Gigabyte Sabre 15G ID: LGD0533, Name: LG Display LP156WF6-SPK3, , 1920x1080, 15.6	HP Pavilion 15t-X7P42AV AU Optronics AUO41ED, , 1920x1080, 15.6	Acer Aspire VX15 VX5-591G-589S BOE CQ NV156HFM-N42, , 1920x1080, 15.6	Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) Sharp SHP1453 LQ156M1, , 1920x1080, 15.6
Response Times		-31%	-30%	-55%	-62%	-163%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	44 (25, 19)	38.8 (20.4, 18.4) 12%	32 (16.4, 15.6) 27%	44.4 (15.2, 29.2) -1%	46 (25, 21) -5%	54 (33.2, 20) -23%
Response Time Black / White *	13 (10, 3)	27.2 (14.8, 12.4) -109%	25.6 (15.6, 10) -97%	27.2 (6.8, 20.4) -109%	34 (20, 14) -162%	52.4 (33.2, 19.2) -303%
PWM Frequency	25000 (30)	25910 (20) 4%	20000 (99) -20%		20000 (90) -20%
Screen		36%	-18%	-16%	23%	46%
Brightness middle	247	335 36%	248.4 1%	209.7 -15%	277 12%	400 62%
Brightness	224	313 40%	241 8%	193 -14%	268 20%	392 75%
Brightness Distribution	85	83 -2%	84 -1%	75 -12%	91 7%	89 5%
Black Level *	0.48	0.27 44%	0.3 37%	0.19 60%	0.26 46%	0.26 46%
Contrast	515	1241 141%	828 61%	1104 114%	1065 107%	1538 199%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *	5.39	4.7 13%	7.5 -39%	7.8 -45%	5.05 6%	4.9 9%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *	7.98	8.1 -2%	25.2 -216%	24.1 -202%	8.93 -12%	11 -38%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *	5.25	5.8 -10%	6.5 -24%	7.3 -39%	2.97 43%	7.2 -37%
Gamma	2.48 ^97%	2.06 ^117%	2.19 ^110%	2.39 ^100%	2.39 ^100%	2.11 ^114%
CCT	7609 ^85%	6518 ^100%	7852 ^83%	5771 ^113%	6466 ^101%	6911 ^94%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	38	58.7 54%	37 -3%	39.3 3%	38 0%	64.2 69%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	60	90.1 50%	57.9 -3%	56.5 -6%	59 -2%	98.9 65%
Totaal Gemiddelde (Programma / Instellingen)		3% / 21%	-24% / -21%	-36% / -22%	-20% / 3%	-59% / 11%

* ... kleiner is beter

Responstijd Scherm

ℹ

De responstijden van het scherm tonen hoe snel het scherm in staat is om van één kleur naar de andere te veranderen. Trage responstijden kunnen aanleiding geven tot 'nabeelden' rond bewegende objecten of het scherm wazig maken (blur). Vooral spelers van snelle 3D-games hebben baat bij een scherm met snelle responstijden.

↔ Responstijd Zwart naar Wit
13 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd	↗ 10 ms stijging
13 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd	↘ 3 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde prima responstijden in onze tests maar is misschien wat te traag voor competitieve games. Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.8 (minimum) tot 240 (maximum) ms. » 9 % van alle toestellen zijn beter. Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd beter is dan het gemiddelde (26.1 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.
↔ Responstijd 50% Grijs naar 80% Grijs
44 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd	↗ 25 ms stijging
44 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd	↘ 19 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde trage responstijden in onze tests en is misschien te traag voor games. Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.9 (minimum) tot 636 (maximum) ms. » 63 % van alle toestellen zijn beter. Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd vergelijkbaar is met het gemiddelde (41.7 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

Om de schermhelderheid te verlagen schakelen sommige laptops het backlight erg snel aan en uit. Dit gebeurt aan een dergelijk hoge frequentie dat het niet zichtbaar is voor het menselijk oog. Als de frequentie te laag is kunnen personen met gevoelige ogen geïrriteerd geraken, hoofdpijn krijgen en zelfs flickering waarnemen.

Screen flickering / PWM waargenomen

25000 Hz

≤ 30 % helderheid instelling

Het backlight van het scherm flikkert aan 25000 Hz (hoogstwaarschijnlijk met PWM - Pulse-Width Modulation) aan een helderheid van 30 % en lager. Boven deze helderheid zou er geen flickering / PWM mogen optreden.

De frequentie van 25000 Hz is redelijk hoog en de meeste mensen die gevoelig zijn aan flickering zouden dit dus niet mogen waarnemen of geïrriteerde ogen krijgen.

Ter vergelijking: 54 % van alle geteste toestellen maakten geen gebruik van PWM om de schermhelderheid te verlagen. Als het wel werd gebruikt, werd een gemiddelde van 10570 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 588200) Hz waargenomen.

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit

Cinebench R15 | Cinebench R11.5 | Cinebench R10

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
HP Pavilion 15t-X7P42AV Intel Core i7-7700HQ	162 Points ∼100% +9%
Asus ZenBook Pro UX550VD Intel Core i7-7700HQ	162 Points ∼100% +9%
Gigabyte Sabre 15G Intel Core i7-7700HQ	161 Points ∼99% +9%
Acer Aspire VX15 VX5-591G-589S Intel Core i5-7300HQ	148 Points ∼91% 0%
Asus VivoBook Pro 15 N580VD-DM028T Intel Core i7-7700HQ	148 Points ∼91%
Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) Intel Core i5-7300HQ	146 Points ∼90% -1%
CPU Multi 64Bit
HP Pavilion 15t-X7P42AV Intel Core i7-7700HQ	741 Points ∼100% +2%
Asus ZenBook Pro UX550VD Intel Core i7-7700HQ	739 Points ∼100% +2%
Gigabyte Sabre 15G Intel Core i7-7700HQ	736 Points ∼99% +2%
Asus VivoBook Pro 15 N580VD-DM028T Intel Core i7-7700HQ	724 Points ∼98%
Acer Aspire VX15 VX5-591G-589S Intel Core i5-7300HQ	511 Points ∼69% -29%
Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) Intel Core i5-7300HQ	508 Points ∼69% -30%

Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Gigabyte Sabre 15G Intel Core i7-7700HQ	1.84 Points ∼100% +8%
HP Pavilion 15t-X7P42AV Intel Core i7-7700HQ	1.82 Points ∼99% +6%
Asus VivoBook Pro 15 N580VD-DM028T Intel Core i7-7700HQ	1.71 Points ∼93%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Gigabyte Sabre 15G Intel Core i7-7700HQ	8.17 Points ∼100% +1%
Asus VivoBook Pro 15 N580VD-DM028T Intel Core i7-7700HQ	8.1 Points ∼99%
HP Pavilion 15t-X7P42AV Intel Core i7-7700HQ	6.81 Points ∼83% -16%

Cinebench R10
Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit
Asus VivoBook Pro 15 N580VD-DM028T Intel Core i7-7700HQ	7352 Points ∼100%
Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit
Asus VivoBook Pro 15 N580VD-DM028T Intel Core i7-7700HQ	28341 Points ∼100%

Cinebench R10 Shading 64Bit

9003 Points

Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit

28341 Points

Cinebench R10 Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit

7352 Points

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit

8.1 Points

Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit

59.61 fps

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit

1.71 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

148 Points

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.6 %

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

96.94 fps

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

724 Points

Help

... in vergelijking

PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Gigabyte Sabre 15G GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, Liteonit CV3-8D128	5063 Points ∼100% +3%
Asus ZenBook Pro UX550VD GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP	5028 (min: 5001, max: 5045) Points ∼99% +2%
Asus VivoBook Pro 15 N580VD-DM028T GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN	4934 Points ∼97%
Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7300HQ, WDC WD10SPCX-75KHST0 + SanDisk Z400s M.2 2242 32 GB Cache	4884 Points ∼96% -1%
HP Pavilion 15t-X7P42AV GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, Samsung CM871a MZNTY128HDHP	2880 Points ∼57% -42%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Asus ZenBook Pro UX550VD GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP	4207 (min: 4206, max: 4213) Points ∼100% +10%
HP Pavilion 15t-X7P42AV GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, Samsung CM871a MZNTY128HDHP	4182 Points ∼99% +9%
Asus VivoBook Pro 15 N580VD-DM028T GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN	3833 Points ∼91%
Acer Aspire VX15 VX5-591G-589S GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7300HQ, Hynix HFS128G39TND	3661 Points ∼87% -4%
Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7300HQ, WDC WD10SPCX-75KHST0 + SanDisk Z400s M.2 2242 32 GB Cache	3659 Points ∼87% -5%
Gigabyte Sabre 15G GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, Liteonit CV3-8D128	3431 Points ∼82% -10%

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		3833 punten
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		4934 punten
Help

	Asus VivoBook Pro 15 N580VD-DM028T Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN	Asus ZenBook Pro UX550VD Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP	HP Pavilion 15t-X7P42AV Samsung CM871a MZNTY128HDHP	Acer Aspire VX15 VX5-591G-589S Hynix HFS128G39TND	Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) WDC WD10SPCX-75KHST0 + SanDisk Z400s M.2 2242 32 GB Cache
CrystalDiskMark 3.0		142%	9%	-3%	-80%
Write 4k QD32	241.5	524.98 117%	140.2 -42%	138.1 -43%	1.057 -100%
Read 4k QD32	246.1	617.36 151%	400.9 63%	375.8 53%	69.75 -72%
Write 4k	79.38	158.02 99%	89.84 13%	104.8 32%	1.021 -99%
Read 4k	24.77	60.63 145%	33.12 34%	35.18 42%	10.84 -56%
Write 512	346.7	687.68 98%	185.4 -47%	137.2 -60%	42.51 -88%
Read 512	319	613.93 92%	399.7 25%	362.1 14%	101.7 -68%
Write Seq	408.3	1364.7 234%	476.6 17%	137.6 -66%	74.17 -82%
Read Seq	483.9	1434.4 196%	522.1 8%	510 5%	123 -75%

CrystalDiskMark 3.0

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN

Sequential Read: 483.9 MB/s

Sequential Write: 408.3 MB/s

512K Read: 319 MB/s

512K Write: 346.7 MB/s

4K Read: 24.77 MB/s

4K Write: 79.38 MB/s

4K QD32 Read: 246.1 MB/s

4K QD32 Write: 241.5 MB/s

3DMark 11 | 3DMark

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), Intel Core i5-7300HQ	8201 Points ∼100% +6%
Acer Aspire VX15 VX5-591G-589S NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), Intel Core i5-7300HQ	7835 Points ∼96% +2%
Gigabyte Sabre 15G NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), Intel Core i7-7700HQ	7731 Points ∼94% 0%
Asus VivoBook Pro 15 N580VD-DM028T NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), Intel Core i7-7700HQ	7712 Points ∼94%
HP Pavilion 15t-X7P42AV NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), Intel Core i7-7700HQ	7564 Points ∼92% -2%
Asus ZenBook Pro UX550VD NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), Intel Core i7-7700HQ	7461 (min: 7273, max: 7576) Points ∼91% -3%

3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), Intel Core i5-7300HQ	6393 Points ∼100% +7%
Gigabyte Sabre 15G NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), Intel Core i7-7700HQ	6166 Points ∼96% +3%
HP Pavilion 15t-X7P42AV NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), Intel Core i7-7700HQ	6100 Points ∼95% +2%
Asus ZenBook Pro UX550VD NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), Intel Core i7-7700HQ	6032 (min: 6004, max: 6035) Points ∼94% +1%
Asus VivoBook Pro 15 N580VD-DM028T NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), Intel Core i7-7700HQ	5982 Points ∼94%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), Intel Core i5-7300HQ	39864 Points ∼100% +4%
Gigabyte Sabre 15G NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), Intel Core i7-7700HQ	39507 Points ∼99% +3%
HP Pavilion 15t-X7P42AV NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), Intel Core i7-7700HQ	38748 Points ∼97% +1%
Asus VivoBook Pro 15 N580VD-DM028T NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), Intel Core i7-7700HQ	38266 Points ∼96%
Asus ZenBook Pro UX550VD NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), Intel Core i7-7700HQ	37128 (min: 36802, max: 37178) Points ∼93% -3%

3DMark 11 Performance		7558 punten
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		20059 punten
3DMark Fire Strike Score		5452 punten
Help

... in vergelijking

The Witcher 3 ultra

The Witcher 3
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off) (sorteer op waarde)
Asus VivoBook Pro 15 N580VD-DM028T GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN	31.02 fps ∼17%
Asus ZenBook Pro UX550VD GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP	37 fps ∼20%
Gigabyte Sabre 15G GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, Liteonit CV3-8D128	41 fps ∼22%
HP Pavilion 15t-X7P42AV GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, Samsung CM871a MZNTY128HDHP	39.9 fps ∼22%
Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7300HQ, WDC WD10SPCX-75KHST0 + SanDisk Z400s M.2 2242 32 GB Cache	34.6 fps ∼19%
1366x768 Medium Graphics & Postprocessing (sorteer op waarde)
Asus VivoBook Pro 15 N580VD-DM028T GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN	69.75 fps ∼30%
Asus ZenBook Pro UX550VD GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP	68.4 fps ∼30%
HP Pavilion 15t-X7P42AV GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, Samsung CM871a MZNTY128HDHP	70.1 fps ∼31%
Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7300HQ, WDC WD10SPCX-75KHST0 + SanDisk Z400s M.2 2242 32 GB Cache	77.3 fps ∼34%
1024x768 Low Graphics & Postprocessing (sorteer op waarde)
Asus VivoBook Pro 15 N580VD-DM028T GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN	111.45 fps ∼31%
HP Pavilion 15t-X7P42AV GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, Samsung CM871a MZNTY128HDHP	120.4 fps ∼34%
Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7300HQ, WDC WD10SPCX-75KHST0 + SanDisk Z400s M.2 2242 32 GB Cache	125.5 fps ∼35%

	lage	gem.	hoge	ultra
The Witcher 3 (2015)	111.45	69.75	31.02	20	fps
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016)	124.17	69.29	39.12	31.59	fps

	Asus VivoBook Pro 15 N580VD-DM028T GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN	Asus ZenBook Pro UX550VD GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP	Gigabyte Sabre 15G GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, Liteonit CV3-8D128	HP Pavilion 15t-X7P42AV GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, Samsung CM871a MZNTY128HDHP	Acer Aspire VX15 VX5-591G-589S GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7300HQ, Hynix HFS128G39TND	Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7300HQ, WDC WD10SPCX-75KHST0 + SanDisk Z400s M.2 2242 32 GB Cache
Noise		7%	-7%	-5%	7%	-6%
off / environment *	30.5	29.4 4%	28.2 8%	29.3 4%	30 2%	30.3 1%
Idle Minimum *	30.6	29.4 4%	33 -8%	32.3 -6%	30 2%	31.6 -3%
Idle Average *	30.9	29.9 3%	33.3 -8%	32.3 -5%	30 3%	31.6 -2%
Idle Maximum *	31.9	29.9 6%	34.7 -9%	32.4 -2%	31.1 3%	33.4 -5%
Load Average *	38.6	38.3 1%	44.5 -15%	44.4 -15%	31.3 19%	47.8 -24%
Witcher 3 ultra *	47.3	39.8 16%	49.2 -4%
Load Maximum *	45.7	39.6 13%	52.8 -16%	49.2 -8%	38.9 15%	47.8 -5%

* ... kleiner is beter

Geluidsniveau

Onbelast		30.6 / 30.9 / 31.9 dB (A)
HDD		30.9 dB (A)
Belasting		38.6 / 45.7 dB (A)

	30 dB stil 40 dB(A) hoorbaar 50 dB(A) luid
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm afstand) environment noise: 30.5 dB(A)

Max. Belasting

Inactief

Witcher 3


38.1 °C	41.8 °C	38.6 °C
25.5 °C	39.8 °C	29.6 °C
25.7 °C	25.2 °C	25.8 °C

Maximum: 41.8 °C
Gemiddelde: 32.2 °C


32.5 °C	36.8 °C	32.2 °C
28.6 °C	30.9 °C	26.7 °C
25 °C	25.2 °C	25.2 °C

Maximum: 36.8 °C
Gemiddelde: 29.2 °C

Stroomadapter (max.) 50.2 °C | Kamertemperatuur 22.4 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket

Max. Belasting

Inactief

Witcher 3


24.9 °C	25.5 °C	25 °C
24.9 °C	26.2 °C	25 °C
24.9 °C	25.2 °C	24.8 °C

Maximum: 26.2 °C
Gemiddelde: 25.2 °C


25.1 °C	25.5 °C	25.3 °C
25.8 °C	25.5 °C	25.9 °C
24.2 °C	24.3 °C	25.1 °C

Maximum: 25.9 °C
Gemiddelde: 25.2 °C

Stroomadapter (max.) 25.3 °C | Kamertemperatuur 22.8 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket

Max. Belasting

Inactief

Witcher 3


43.1 °C	48 °C	43.6 °C
33.3 °C	46 °C	35.9 °C
32.1 °C	34.8 °C	32.2 °C

Maximum: 48 °C
Gemiddelde: 38.8 °C


38.5 °C	44.5 °C	34.9 °C
35 °C	35 °C	30.8 °C
28.7 °C	29.3 °C	29.4 °C

Maximum: 44.5 °C
Gemiddelde: 34 °C

Stroomadapter (max.) 46 °C | Kamertemperatuur 24 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket

	Asus VivoBook Pro 15 N580VD-DM028T GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN	Asus ZenBook Pro UX550VD GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP	Gigabyte Sabre 15G GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, Liteonit CV3-8D128	HP Pavilion 15t-X7P42AV GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, Samsung CM871a MZNTY128HDHP	Acer Aspire VX15 VX5-591G-589S GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7300HQ, Hynix HFS128G39TND	Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7300HQ, WDC WD10SPCX-75KHST0 + SanDisk Z400s M.2 2242 32 GB Cache
Heat		-9%	-8%	6%	-16%	-14%
Maximum Upper Side *	41.8	43.6 -4%	43.6 -4%	41.8 -0%	47.2 -13%	47.6 -14%
Maximum Bottom *	36.8	44.5 -21%	40.2 -9%	33.4 9%	42.2 -15%	42.1 -14%
Idle Upper Side *	26.2	28 -7%	27.8 -6%	24.4 7%	31.8 -21%	29.9 -14%
Idle Bottom *	25.9	26.7 -3%	29.2 -13%	23.8 8%	29.5 -14%	29.8 -15%

* ... kleiner is beter

Asus VivoBook Pro 15 N580VD-DM028T audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (71.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (7.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 4% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 18%, worst was 41%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 9%, average was 19%, worst was 47%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Stroomgebruik

Uit / Standby	0.3 / 0.5 Watt
Inactief	4.7 / 7.7 / 10.9 Watt
Belasting	82 / 120 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Asus VivoBook Pro 15 N580VD-DM028T 7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN, TN, 1920x1080, 15.6	Asus ZenBook Pro UX550VD 7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6	Gigabyte Sabre 15G 7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), Liteonit CV3-8D128, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6	HP Pavilion 15t-X7P42AV 7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), Samsung CM871a MZNTY128HDHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6	Acer Aspire VX15 VX5-591G-589S 7300HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), Hynix HFS128G39TND, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6	Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) 7300HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), WDC WD10SPCX-75KHST0 + SanDisk Z400s M.2 2242 32 GB Cache, LED IGZO IPS InfinityEdge, 1920x1080, 15.6
Power Consumption		-2%	-14%	-19%	-27%	-12%
Idle Minimum *	4.7	5.05 -7%	8 -70%	8.29 -76%	8.4 -79%	6.6 -40%
Idle Average *	7.7	8.2 -6%	10.9 -42%	8.9 -16%	13.1 -70%	9 -17%
Idle Maximum *	10.9	12.2 -12%	11 -1%	10.2 6%	14.2 -30%	10.7 2%
Load Average *	82	82 -0%	76.7 6%	77.1 6%	50 39%	77.5 5%
Load Maximum *	120	120 -0%	106.4 11%	136.6 -14%	111 7%	130 -8%
Witcher 3 ultra *	109	93.1 15%	94.9 13%

* ... kleiner is beter

Batterijduur

Inactief (zonder WLAN, minimale helderheid)		10h 9min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3		6h 32min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		5h 52min
Belast (maximale helderheid)		1h 22min

	Asus VivoBook Pro 15 N580VD-DM028T 7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 47 Wh	Asus ZenBook Pro UX550VD 7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 73 Wh	Gigabyte Sabre 15G 7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 47 Wh	HP Pavilion 15t-X7P42AV 7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 63.3 Wh	Acer Aspire VX15 VX5-591G-589S 7300HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 52.5 Wh	Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) 7300HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 56 Wh
Batterijduur		32%	-19%	32%	-16%	-7%
Reader / Idle	609	1061 74%	493 -19%	961 58%		565 -7%
H.264	352	465 32%
WiFi v1.3	392	535 36%	261 -33%	389 -1%	330 -16%	334 -15%
Load	82	70 -15%	77 -6%	115 40%		84 2%
Witcher 3 ultra		68

Pro

+ Elegant ontwerp

+ Relatief licht

+ Goede applicatieprestaties

+ Blijft altijd koel

+ Relatief goede luidsprekers

+ Efficiënt

Contra

- Klein aanbod van poorten

- 2x USB 2.0

- Smal nummerblok en pijltoetsen

- Luid touchpad

- Matig TN beeldscherm

- Wachttijden

- Extreme prestatiebeperking op accustroom

- Pulserende ventilatoren zonder duidelijke reden

Getest: Asus VivoBook 15. Testmodel geleverd door Notebooksbilliger.

Voor het volledige, Engelse testrapport, klik hier.

De Asus VivoBook Pro 15 heeft een elegante behuizing en maakt indruk met stille ventilatoren bij lage belasting, een handzaam gewicht, goede luidsprekers en effectief temperatuurbeheer.

We hebben op dit moment moeite de VivoBook een aanbeveling te geven, vanwege extreme prestatiebeperkingen op accustroom, pulserende ventilator en omdat het apparaat soms uitvalt. Al deze problemen kunnen met updates verhopen worden. Echter, ook het beeldscherm en het aanbod van poorten valt tegen. Het blijft een van de duurdere modellen.

Momenteel wordt het totaalbeeld vooral gevormd door de negatieve aspecten. Het is lijkt niet een probleem met de hardware te zijn, maar eerder een firmware probleem. Asus zou dit snel moeten rechtzetten zodat de VivoBook een goede laptop kan zijn. Ook vinden we de prijs aan de hoge kant; sommige concurrenten zijn minder duur.

De Asus VivoBook Pro 15 wordt geplaagd door uitval, wachttijden, extreme prestatiebeperkingen op accustroom en een pulserende ventilator. Ook valt het TN beeldscherm tegen en is de hoge prijs niet gerechtvaardigd.

Asus VivoBook Pro 15 N580VD-DM028T - 2017-10-0909-10-2017 v6
Christian Hintze

Behuizing

79 / 98 → 80%

Toetsenbord

76%

Aanwijsapparaat

76%

Aansluitmogelijkheden

50 / 81 → 61%

Gewicht

63 / 20-67 → 92%

Batterij

87%

Beeldscherm

79%

Gaming-performance

83 / 85 → 98%

Applicatie-performance

87 / 92 → 94%

Temperatuur

90%

Luidheid

80 / 95 → 84%

Audio

73%

Camera

25 / 85 → 29%

Extra punten

-1%

Gemiddelde

68%

81%

Multimedia - Gewogen Gemiddelde

Kort testrapport Asus VivoBook Pro 15 (i7-7700HQ, GTX 1050) Laptop

Size Comparison

Top 10 Testrapporten

Responstijd Scherm

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Asus VivoBook Pro 15 N580VD-DM028T audio analysis

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

Pro

Contra

Pricecompare