Notebookcheck

Kort testrapport Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS: unieke game notebook met veel prestaties onder de motorkap

Beeldend Duo. Met zijn krachtige hardware slaagt de Zephyrus Duo erin de nieuwste games soepel weer te geven op zijn matte 4K-scherm (IPS, Pantone-gevalideerd, 100% AdobeRGB, G-Sync). Er zijn ook andere geweldige functies: 2x NVMe SSD (RAID 0), 32 GB RAM (in dual-channel modus), Thunderbolt 3. Daarnaast wordt de laptop geleverd met vele accessoires.
Sascha Mölck, 👁 Florian Glaser, Andrea Grüblinger,
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS
Processor
Intel Core i9-10980HK 8 x 2.4 - 5.3 GHz, Comet Lake-H
Grafische kaart
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q - 8192 MB, Core: 735-1080 MHz, Geheugen: 1375 MHz, GDDR6, 256-bit interface, 27.21.14.5148 (Nvidia 451.48), Optimus
Geheugen
32768 MB 
, DDR4-3200, dual-channel, een slot (bezet), 16 GB gesoldeerd
Beeldscherm
15.6 inch 16:9, 3840 x 2160 pixel 282 PPI, AU Optronics B156ZAN03.1, IPS, G-Sync, X-Rite Pantone, glimmend: nee, 60 Hz
Moederbord
Intel HM470
Opslag
2x Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR (RAID 0), 2048 GB 
, 1780 GB beschikbaar
Verbindingen
2 USB 3.0, 2 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Audio Verbindingen: microfoon input, headset (gecombineerde audio-aansluiting), TPM 2.0
Netwerkmogelijkheden
Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000/2500/5000MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5
Afmetingen
hoogte x breedte x diepte (in mm): 20 x 360 x 268
Batterij
90 Wh, 5675 mAh Lithium-Ion, 15.4 V
Besturingssysteem
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Bijkomende functionaliteiten
Luidsprekers: Stereo, Toetsenbord: Chiclet, Toetsenbordverlichting: ja, Hoofdtelefoon, gamemuis, externe webcam, palmsteun, tweede oplader (Type-C USB) en laptophoes, McAfee LiveSafe (trial version), MS Office 365, 24 Maanden Garantie
Gewicht
2.512 kg, Voeding: 625 g
Prijs
4500 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Evaluatie
Datum
Model
Gewicht
Hoogte
Formaat
Resolutie
Best Price
85 %
07-2020
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS
i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
2.5 kg20 mm15.6"3840x2160
04-2020
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
2.1 kg18 mm15.6"1920x1080
83 %
05-2020
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
2.2 kg20 mm15.6"1920x1080
85 %
05-2020
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP
i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
2.2 kg20 mm15.6"3840x2160
Left: AC adapter, microphone input, combined audio jack (headset)
Left: AC adapter, microphone input, combined audio jack (headset)
Right: 2x USB 3.2 Gen 1  (Type-A), Thunderbolt 3 (DP 1.4, Power Delivery 3.0)
Right: 2x USB 3.2 Gen 1 (Type-A), Thunderbolt 3 (DP 1.4, Power Delivery 3.0)
Back: Gigabit Ethernet, USB 3.2 Gen 2 (Type-A), HDMI 2.0b
Back: Gigabit Ethernet, USB 3.2 Gen 2 (Type-A), HDMI 2.0b
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter (201NGW)
1390 MBit/s ∼100% +10%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter (201NGW)
1320 MBit/s ∼95% +5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1260 MBit/s ∼91%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)
1170 MBit/s ∼84% -7%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
  (289 - 1722, n=66)
1170 MBit/s ∼84% -7%
Average of class Gaming
  (141 - 1670, n=334)
704 MBit/s ∼51% -44%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter (201NGW)
1340 MBit/s ∼100% +4%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter (201NGW)
1330 MBit/s ∼99% +3%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)
1310 MBit/s ∼98% +2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1290 MBit/s ∼96%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
  (49.8 - 1666, n=66)
1026 MBit/s ∼77% -20%
Average of class Gaming
  (144 - 1645, n=334)
656 MBit/s ∼49% -49%
401
cd/m²
398
cd/m²
361
cd/m²
401
cd/m²
398
cd/m²
360
cd/m²
385
cd/m²
395
cd/m²
368
cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling
AU Optronics B156ZAN03.1
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 401 cd/m² Gemiddelde: 385.2 cd/m² Minimum: 21 cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling: 90 %
Helderheid in Batterij-modus: 398 cd/m²
Contrast: 1421:1 (Zwart: 0.28 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.53 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.8, calibrated: 0.77
ΔE Greyscale 2.4 | 0.64-98 Ø6
100% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 100% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.19
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS
AU Optronics B156ZAN03.1, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
AUO B156HAN12.0 (AUO7A8C), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
AUO B156HAN12.0 (AUO328E), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP
Samsung SDCA029, OLED, 3840x2160, 15.6
Response Times
66%
68%
95%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
56.4 (26.4, 30)
14.4 (7.2, 7.2)
74%
14 (6.8, 7.2)
75%
2.2 (1, 1.2)
96%
Response Time Black / White *
24.4 (10, 14.4)
10.4 (5.2, 5.2)
57%
9.6 (5.2, 4.4)
61%
1.8 (1, 0.8)
93%
PWM Frequency
60 (80)
Screen
-48%
-31%
-30%
Brightness middle
398
320
-20%
316
-21%
385
-3%
Brightness
385
318
-17%
311
-19%
390
1%
Brightness Distribution
90
88
-2%
92
2%
93
3%
Black Level *
0.28
0.24
14%
0.21
25%
Contrast
1421
1333
-6%
1505
6%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
1.53
4.03
-163%
3.03
-98%
2.46
-61%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
3.69
8.43
-128%
7.32
-98%
4.01
-9%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
0.77
0.98
-27%
1.1
-43%
2.6
-238%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
2.4
5.94
-148%
3.9
-63%
1.39
42%
Gamma
2.19 100%
2.42 91%
2.42 91%
2.31 95%
CCT
6996 93%
6751 96%
7439 87%
6395 102%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
100
66
-34%
65
-35%
98
-2%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
100
99
-1%
100
0%
100
0%
Totaal Gemiddelde (Programma / Instellingen)
9% / -31%
19% / -16%
33% / -7%

* ... kleiner is beter

Responstijd Scherm

De responstijden van het scherm tonen hoe snel het scherm in staat is om van één kleur naar de andere te veranderen. Trage responstijden kunnen aanleiding geven tot 'nabeelden' rond bewegende objecten of het scherm wazig maken (blur). Vooral spelers van snelle 3D-games hebben baat bij een scherm met snelle responstijden.
       Responstijd Zwart naar Wit
24.4 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd↗ 10 ms stijging
↘ 14.4 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde prima responstijden in onze tests maar is misschien wat te traag voor competitieve games.
Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.8 (minimum) tot 240 (maximum) ms. » 40 % van alle toestellen zijn beter.
Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd vergelijkbaar is met het gemiddelde (24.5 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.
       Responstijd 50% Grijs naar 80% Grijs
56.4 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd↗ 26.4 ms stijging
↘ 30 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde trage responstijden in onze tests en is misschien te traag voor games.
Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.8 (minimum) tot 636 (maximum) ms. » 92 % van alle toestellen zijn beter.
Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd slechter is dan het gemiddelde (39 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Om de schermhelderheid te verlagen schakelen sommige laptops het backlight erg snel aan en uit. Dit gebeurt aan een dergelijk hoge frequentie dat het niet zichtbaar is voor het menselijk oog. Als de frequentie te laag is kunnen personen met gevoelige ogen geïrriteerd geraken, hoofdpijn krijgen en zelfs flickering waarnemen.
Screen flickering / PWM niet waargenomen

Ter vergelijking: 51 % van alle geteste toestellen maakten geen gebruik van PWM om de schermhelderheid te verlagen. Als het wel werd gebruikt, werd een gemiddelde van 17893 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 2500000) Hz waargenomen.

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
HWInfo
HWInfo
 
01020304050607080901001101201301401501601701801902002102202302402502602702802903003103203303403503603703803904004104204304404504604704804905005105205305405505605705805906006106206306406506606706806907007107207307407507607707807908008108208308408508608708808909009109209309409509609709809901000101010201030104010501060107010801090110011101120113011401150116011701180119012001210122012301240125012601270128012901300131013201330134013501360137013801390140014101420143014401450146014701480149015001510152015301540155015601570158015901600161016201630164016501660167016801690170017101720173017401750176017701780179018001810182018301840185018601870Tooltip
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS Intel Core i9-10980HK, Intel Core i9-10980HK: Ø1560 (1527.18-1799.01)
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 Intel Core i7-10750H, Intel Core i7-10750H: Ø1213 (1201.27-1287.87)
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS Intel Core i9-10980HK, Intel Core i9-10980HK: Ø1541 (1518.31-1635.12)
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP Intel Core i7-10875H, Intel Core i7-10875H: Ø1573 (1544.4-1818.6)
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS Intel Core i9-10980HK, Intel Core i9-10980HK; Turbo: Ø1671 (1636.19-1862.18)
CPU clock rates during the CB15 loop
CPU clock rates during the CB15 loop
CPU clock rates during the CB15 loop (Turbo)
CPU clock rates during the CB15 loop (Turbo)
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
205 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1799 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
147.46 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Help
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS
Intel Core i9-10980HK (Turbo)
219 Points ∼100% +7%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP
Intel Core i7-10875H
213 Points ∼97% +4%
Average Intel Core i9-10980HK
  (201 - 219, n=8)
207 Points ∼95% +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
205 Points ∼94%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
201 Points ∼92% -2%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
Intel Core i7-10750H
190 Points ∼87% -7%
Average of class Gaming
  (77 - 219, n=593)
160 Points ∼73% -22%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS
Intel Core i9-10980HK (Turbo)
1862 Points ∼100% +4%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP
Intel Core i7-10875H
1818 (min: 1544.4, max: 1818.6) Points ∼98% +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
1799 Points ∼97%
Average Intel Core i9-10980HK
  (1614 - 1862, n=8)
1736 Points ∼93% -4%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
1635 (min: 1518.31, max: 1635.12) Points ∼88% -9%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
Intel Core i7-10750H
1288 (min: 1201.27, max: 1287.87) Points ∼69% -28%
Average of class Gaming
  (196 - 2804, n=597)
902 Points ∼48% -50%
Blender 2.79 - BMW27 CPU
Average of class Gaming
  (179 - 901, n=61)
398 Seconds * ∼100% -37%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
Intel Core i7-10750H
368 Seconds * ∼92% -27%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
295 Seconds * ∼74% -2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS
Intel Core i9-10980HK (Turbo)
292.8 Seconds * ∼74% -1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
290.5 Seconds * ∼73%
Average Intel Core i9-10980HK
  (278 - 295, n=6)
287 Seconds * ∼72% +1%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP
Intel Core i7-10875H
285 Seconds * ∼72% +2%
7-Zip 18.03
7z b 4
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
47455 MIPS ∼100%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP
Intel Core i7-10875H
47170 MIPS ∼99% -1%
Average Intel Core i9-10980HK
  (43786 - 47806, n=6)
46153 MIPS ∼97% -3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS
Intel Core i9-10980HK (Turbo)
44959 MIPS ∼95% -5%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
43786 MIPS ∼92% -8%
Average of class Gaming
  (3034 - 75612, n=61)
36332 MIPS ∼77% -23%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
Intel Core i7-10750H
35130 MIPS ∼74% -26%
7z b 4 -mmt1
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP
Intel Core i7-10875H
5457 MIPS ∼100% +2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
5364 MIPS ∼98%
Average Intel Core i9-10980HK
  (5081 - 5525, n=6)
5333 MIPS ∼98% -1%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
5227 MIPS ∼96% -3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS
Intel Core i9-10980HK (Turbo)
5081 MIPS ∼93% -5%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
Intel Core i7-10750H
5015 MIPS ∼92% -7%
Average of class Gaming
  (2480 - 5674, n=61)
4835 MIPS ∼89% -10%
Cinebench R20
CPU (Single Core)
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP
Intel Core i7-10875H
511 Points ∼100% +3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
494 Points ∼97%
Average Intel Core i9-10980HK
  (476 - 494, n=6)
486 Points ∼95% -2%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
477 Points ∼93% -3%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
Intel Core i7-10750H
468 Points ∼92% -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (340 - 511, n=107)
445 Points ∼87% -10%
CPU (Multi Core)
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP
Intel Core i7-10875H
3801 Points ∼100% +1%
Average Intel Core i9-10980HK
  (3539 - 3883, n=6)
3769 Points ∼99% 0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
3762 Points ∼99%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
3713 Points ∼98% -1%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
Intel Core i7-10750H
2932 Points ∼77% -22%
Average of class Gaming
  (1530 - 6321, n=108)
2910 Points ∼77% -23%
Geekbench 5.1 / 5.2
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
8416 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i9-10980HK
  (7634 - 8666, n=5)
8281 Points ∼98% -2%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP
Intel Core i7-10875H
8087 Points ∼96% -4%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
7634 Points ∼91% -9%
Average of class Gaming
  (3448 - 10190, n=42)
6637 Points ∼79% -21%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
Intel Core i7-10750H
6216 Points ∼74% -26%
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
1401 Points ∼100%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP
Intel Core i7-10875H
1347 Points ∼96% -4%
Average Intel Core i9-10980HK
  (1283 - 1401, n=5)
1341 Points ∼96% -4%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
1283 Points ∼92% -8%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
Intel Core i7-10750H
1233 Points ∼88% -12%
Average of class Gaming
  (874 - 1401, n=42)
1203 Points ∼86% -14%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP
Intel Core i7-10875H
13 fps ∼100% +4%
Average Intel Core i9-10980HK
  (12.2 - 13, n=6)
12.6 fps ∼97% +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
12.5 fps ∼96%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS
Intel Core i9-10980HK (Turbo)
12.5 fps ∼96% 0%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
12.2 fps ∼94% -2%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
Intel Core i7-10750H
10.1 fps ∼78% -19%
Average of class Gaming
  (1.7 - 18.9, n=61)
9.9 fps ∼76% -21%
LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF
Average of class Gaming
  (28.6 - 95.8, n=37)
59.1 s ∼100% +8%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
54.8 s ∼93%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
52.4 s ∼89% -4%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP
Intel Core i7-10875H
52.4 s ∼89% -4%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
Intel Core i7-10750H
52.1 s ∼88% -5%
Average Intel Core i9-10980HK
  (48.4 - 54.8, n=6)
51.6 s ∼87% -6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS
Intel Core i9-10980HK (Turbo)
48.89 s ∼83% -11%
R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean
Average of class Gaming
  (0.546 - 0.761, n=42)
0.618 sec * ∼100% -6%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
Intel Core i7-10750H
0.606 sec * ∼98% -4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS
Intel Core i9-10980HK (Turbo)
0.596 sec * ∼96% -2%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
0.592 sec * ∼96% -2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
0.582 sec * ∼94%
Average Intel Core i9-10980HK
  (0.564 - 0.596, n=6)
0.58 sec * ∼94% -0%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP
Intel Core i7-10875H
0.547 sec * ∼89% +6%

* ... kleiner is beter

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
3821 punten
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
4210 punten
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
4762 punten
Help
PCMark 10 - Score
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H)
6580 Points ∼100% +25%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i9-10980HK, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
6490 Points ∼99% +23%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10750H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
5484 Points ∼83% +4%
Average of class Gaming
  (2603 - 7511, n=279)
5312 Points ∼81% +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i9-10980HK, 2x Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR (RAID 0)
5277 Points ∼80%
Average Intel Core i9-10980HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
 
5277 Points ∼80% 0%
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Average of class Gaming
  (2484 - 6593, n=438)
5101 Points ∼100% +7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i9-10980HK, 2x Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR (RAID 0)
4762 Points ∼93%
Average Intel Core i9-10980HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
 
4762 Points ∼93% 0%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Average of class Gaming
  (2554 - 6093, n=455)
4284 Points ∼100% +12%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i9-10980HK, 2x Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR (RAID 0)
3821 Points ∼89%
Average Intel Core i9-10980HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
 
3821 Points ∼89% 0%
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10750H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
6243.8 μs * ∼100% -85%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i9-10980HK, 2x Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR (RAID 0)
3374.7 μs * ∼54%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i9-10980HK, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
1916 μs * ∼31% +43%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H)
1877.3 μs * ∼30% +44%

* ... kleiner is beter

2x Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR (RAID 0)
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3536 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 3431 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 528.7 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 472.7 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 2984 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 2958 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 48.4 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 127.6 MB/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS
2x Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR (RAID 0)
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP
Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H)
Average 2x Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR (RAID 0)
 
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
-8%
-13%
-4%
0%
Write 4K
127.6
131.7
3%
131.3
3%
127.4
0%
128
0%
Read 4K
48.4
47.34
-2%
45.84
-5%
147.5
205%
48.4
0%
Write Seq
2958
2884
-3%
2370
-20%
485.9
-84%
2958
0%
Read Seq
2984
2303
-23%
1509
-49%
1352
-55%
2984
0%
Write 4K Q32T1
472.7
423.9
-10%
481.5
2%
476.5
1%
473
0%
Read 4K Q32T1
528.7
487.7
-8%
559.6
6%
531.2
0%
529
0%
Write Seq Q32T1
3431
2822
-18%
2392
-30%
1061
-69%
3431
0%
Read Seq Q32T1
3536
3478
-2%
3232
-9%
2552
-28%
3536
0%
AS SSD
2%
-1%
-36%
0%
Copy Game MB/s
1404.1
1404
0%
Copy Program MB/s
604.27
604
0%
Copy ISO MB/s
2438.33
2438
0%
Score Total
4492
4677
4%
4950
10%
2594
-42%
4492
0%
Score Write
1688
2367
40%
2176
29%
1117
-34%
1688
0%
Score Read
1861
1529
-18%
1790
-4%
975
-48%
1861
0%
Access Time Write *
0.033
0.038
-15%
0.034
-3%
0.045
-36%
0.033
-0%
Access Time Read *
0.062
0.065
-5%
0.071
-15%
0.103
-66%
0.062
-0%
4K-64 Write
1296.26
2007.16
55%
1829.36
41%
929.38
-28%
1296
0%
4K-64 Read
1518.76
1205.16
-21%
1635.31
8%
789.2
-48%
1519
0%
4K Write
113.87
98.89
-13%
110.7
-3%
103.83
-9%
114
0%
4K Read
43.98
47.55
8%
48.09
9%
65.76
50%
44
0%
Seq Write
2783.45
2612.8
-6%
2359.82
-15%
836.4
-70%
2783
0%
Seq Read
2980.71
2766.61
-7%
1064.87
-64%
1200.02
-60%
2981
0%
Totaal Gemiddelde (Programma / Instellingen)
-3% / -2%
-7% / -6%
-20% / -22%
0% / 0%

* ... kleiner is beter

Continuous read performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

010203040506070809010011012013014015016017018019020021022023024025026027028029030031032033034035036037038039040041042043044045046047048049050051052053054055056057058059060061062063064065066067068069070071072073074075076077078079080081082083084085086087088089090091092093094095096097098099010001010102010301040105010601070108010901100111011201130114011501160117011801190120012101220123012401250126012701280129013001310132013301340135013601370138013901400141014201430144014501460147014801490150015101520153015401550156015701580159016001610162016301640165016601670168016901700171017201730174017501760177017801790180018101820183018401850186018701880189019001910192019301940195019601970198019902000201020202030204020502060207020802090210021102120213021402150216021702180219022002210222022302240225022602270228022902300231023202330234023502360237023802390240024102420243024402450246024702480249025002510252025302540255025602570258025902600261026202630264026502660267026802690270027102720273027402750276027702780279028002810282028302840285028602870288028902900291029202930294029502960297029802990300030103020303030403050306030703080309031003110312031303140315031603170318031903200321032203230324032503260327032803290330033103320333033403350336033703380339034003410342034303440345034603470348034903500351035203530Tooltip
: Ø3513 (3304.27-3524.47)
3DMark 11 Performance
23526 punten
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
44534 punten
3DMark Fire Strike Score
17714 punten
3DMark Time Spy Score
7780 punten
Help
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10980HK (Turbo)
32946 Points ∼100% +21%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10750H
30456 Points ∼92% +12%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10875H
28900 Points ∼88% +6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
  (26292 - 32946, n=6)
28659 Points ∼87% +5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10980HK
27202 Points ∼83%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10980HK
25135 Points ∼76% -8%
Average of class Gaming
  (513 - 50983, n=690)
14446 Points ∼44% -47%
3DMark
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10980HK (Turbo)
8979 Points ∼100% +17%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10750H
8379 Points ∼93% +9%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
  (7372 - 8979, n=7)
7979 Points ∼89% +4%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10875H
7829 Points ∼87% +2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10980HK
7665 Points ∼85%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10980HK
7084 Points ∼79% -8%
Average of class Gaming
  (368 - 13013, n=227)
5974 Points ∼67% -22%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10980HK (Turbo)
22967 Points ∼100% +15%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10750H
22326 Points ∼97% +12%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10875H
21121 Points ∼92% +6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
  (19655 - 22967, n=6)
21076 Points ∼92% +6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10980HK
19914 Points ∼87%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10980HK
18992 Points ∼83% -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (385 - 40636, n=613)
12074 Points ∼53% -39%
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS
Intel Core i9-10980HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q (Turbo)
95.8 fps ∼100% +26%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
83.4 (min: 67) fps ∼87% +10%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
  (74.3 - 95.8, n=8)
82.9 fps ∼87% +9%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP
Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
79.1 (min: 64) fps ∼83% +4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS
Intel Core i9-10980HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
75.8 (min: 63) fps ∼79%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
70.5 (min: 55) fps ∼74% -7%
Average of class Gaming
  (12.6 - 115, n=386)
52.6 fps ∼55% -31%
BioShock Infinite - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF)
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS
Intel Core i9-10980HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q (Turbo)
181.1 fps ∼100% +5%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
  (173 - 181, n=3)
176 fps ∼97% +2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS
Intel Core i9-10980HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
173.1 fps ∼96%
Average of class Gaming
  (9.7 - 266, n=376)
102 fps ∼56% -41%
Doom Eternal - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS
Intel Core i9-10980HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q (Turbo)
165.2 fps ∼100% +9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS
Intel Core i9-10980HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
152.1 fps ∼92%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
  (140 - 165, n=5)
150 fps ∼91% -1%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
147 (min: 94) fps ∼89% -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (93.3 - 191, n=20)
138 fps ∼84% -9%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
137 fps ∼83% -10%
Red Dead Redemption 2 - 1920x1080 Maximum Settings
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS
Intel Core i9-10980HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
44.9 fps ∼100%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
43.7 (min: 28) fps ∼97% -3%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
  (40.6 - 44.9, n=4)
42.6 fps ∼95% -5%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP
Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
42.4 (min: 25) fps ∼94% -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (18.6 - 56.8, n=23)
37.4 fps ∼83% -17%
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2019 - 1920x1080 Maximum Settings AA:T2X Filmic SM
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
107 (min: 72) fps ∼100% +17%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
  (91.2 - 107, n=4)
96 fps ∼90% +5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS
Intel Core i9-10980HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
91.2 fps ∼85%
Average of class Gaming
  (29.8 - 136, n=23)
80.3 fps ∼75% -12%
Far Cry 5 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS
Intel Core i9-10980HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
102 fps ∼100%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
  (91 - 102, n=2)
96.5 fps ∼95% -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (10 - 113, n=50)
71.4 fps ∼70% -30%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 Highest Preset AA:T
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP
Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
100 (min: 77) fps ∼100% +12%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
97 (min: 75) fps ∼97% +9%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
  (89 - 97, n=7)
92.9 fps ∼93% +4%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
91 (min: 72) fps ∼91% +2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS
Intel Core i9-10980HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q (Turbo)
91 fps ∼91% +2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS
Intel Core i9-10980HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
89 fps ∼89%
Average of class Gaming
  (23 - 124, n=96)
75 fps ∼75% -16%
05101520253035404550556065707580859095100Tooltip
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i9-10980HK, 2x Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR (RAID 0): Ø76.3 (71-79)
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10750H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ: Ø84.4 (72-91)
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i9-10980HK, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR: Ø71.1 (67-75)
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H): Ø80.3 (75-84)
GPU readings during our The Witcher 3 test
GPU readings during our The Witcher 3 test
lage gem. hoge ultraQHD4K
BioShock Infinite (2013) 425.1 349.2 324.2 173.1 fps
The Witcher 3 (2015) 330.5 237 143.4 75.8 53.5 fps
Far Cry 5 (2018) 143 115 108 102 77 42 fps
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) 103 95 93 89 67 36 fps
Total War: Three Kingdoms (2019) 245.5 136.4 86.5 62.5 39.9 19.6 fps
Ghost Recon Breakpoint (2019) 128 93 87 65 49 29 fps
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2019 (2019) 172.3 123.6 104.3 91.2 64.7 36.3 fps
Red Dead Redemption 2 (2019) 131.4 99.7 68.3 44.9 36.2 23.5 fps
Doom Eternal (2020) 205 168.3 154 152.1 116.7 64 fps
Gears Tactics (2020) 210.4 161.2 110.6 89.7 57.9 30.3 fps
F1 2020 (2020) 253 167 149 118 89 51 fps

Geluidsniveau

Onbelast
33 / 34 / 35 dB (A)
Belasting
48 / 49 dB (A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
stil
40 dB(A)
hoorbaar
50 dB(A)
luid
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm afstand)   environment noise: 30 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2037.632.638.230.938.52540.235.340.533.239.23132.432.631.329.931.34034.831.532.335.733.75041.835.834.631.742.46333.228.528.329.135.38028.526.727.425.731.810025.62526.224.726.912528.225.525.824.627.81603227.827.725.831.220031.124.424.322.83125031.522.923.522.132.931530.823.423.521.33240034.224.923.119.53550031.922.9221933.46303423.42217.835.480036.925.424.21837.4100039.326.726.317.940.212503924.923.318.939.9160037.822.420.817.939.1200037.522.220.417.739.4250035.920.519.517.637.3315034.521.619.51836.440003519.518.917.936.6500035.119.2191836.6630032.918.518.517.935.7800028.218.818.61830.21000025.819.218.817.926.91250025.119.81917.8241600022.11918.617.920.1SPL47.934.533.530.449.2N6.22.121.46.8median 32.9median 22.9median 22median 18median 35Delta3.82.42.52.13.6hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseAsus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS
i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP
i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
 
Average of class Gaming
 
Noise
0%
-4%
-5%
2%
5%
off / environment *
30
30
-0%
30
-0%
30
-0%
28.9 (25 - 30.1, n=6)
4%
29.2 (25 - 32, n=387)
3%
Idle Minimum *
33
30
9%
32
3%
34
-3%
31.2 (30 - 33, n=6)
5%
31.4 (25 - 42, n=810)
5%
Idle Average *
34
33
3%
34
-0%
36
-6%
32.5 (30 - 35, n=6)
4%
32.6 (26 - 46.6, n=810)
4%
Idle Maximum *
35
36
-3%
39
-11%
41
-17%
35.8 (30.1 - 43, n=6)
-2%
34.7 (28 - 52, n=810)
1%
Load Average *
48
50
-4%
53
-10%
48
-0%
45.9 (39.5 - 50, n=6)
4%
41.1 (28 - 59, n=811)
14%
Witcher 3 ultra *
48
48
-0%
48
-0%
48
-0%
Load Maximum *
49
50
-2%
53
-8%
54
-10%
49.6 (45 - 59.4, n=6)
-1%
48.4 (38.9 - 64.1, n=811)
1%

* ... kleiner is beter

Max. Belasting
 34 °C36 °C35 °C 
 43 °C43 °C41 °C 
 42 °C42 °C40 °C 
Maximum: 43 °C
Gemiddelde: 39.6 °C
52 °C53 °C47 °C
50 °C51 °C44 °C
43 °C44 °C42 °C
Maximum: 53 °C
Gemiddelde: 47.3 °C
Stroomadapter (max.)  47 °C | Kamertemperatuur 23 °C | Voltcraft IR-900
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 39.6 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 33.3 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 39.8 °C / 104 F, ranging from 21.6 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 53 °C / 127 F, compared to the average of 42.5 °C / 109 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.4 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 33.3 °C / 92 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 40.1 °C / 104 F, compared to the device average of 33.3 °C / 92 F.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 44 °C / 111.2 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-15.2 °C / -27.4 F).
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS
i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP
i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
 
Average of class Gaming
 
Heat
3%
-2%
-2%
-3%
0%
Maximum Upper Side *
43
44
-2%
53
-23%
49
-14%
49.3 (43 - 57, n=6)
-15%
46 (28 - 68.8, n=774)
-7%
Maximum Bottom *
53
50
6%
55
-4%
61
-15%
53.4 (50 - 59, n=6)
-1%
49.8 (25.9 - 78, n=772)
6%
Idle Upper Side *
32
29
9%
28
12%
27
16%
30 (27.4 - 34, n=6)
6%
30.7 (21.6 - 46.8, n=726)
4%
Idle Bottom *
31
31
-0%
29
6%
29
6%
30.9 (28 - 33, n=6)
-0%
31.8 (21.1 - 50.3, n=724)
-3%

* ... kleiner is beter

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2030.936.32533.241.83129.933.34035.738.35031.740.56329.133.68025.743.410024.752.212524.654.916025.853.820022.853.425022.156.931521.359.840019.5655001964.263017.865.88001867.8100017.971.4125018.972.4160017.976.5200017.773.1250017.671.631501870.3400017.97850001879.3630017.977.580001878.31000017.976.21250017.871.21600017.959.9SPL30.487.1N1.469.2median 18median 70.3Delta2.17.2hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseAsus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.2% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 29% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 65% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 12% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Stroomgebruik
Uit / Standbydarklight 0.4 / 2.1 Watt
Inactiefdarkmidlight 23 / 30 / 39 Watt
Belasting midlight 156 / 208 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS
i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP
i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
 
Average of class Gaming
 
Power Consumption
31%
23%
10%
24%
22%
Idle Minimum *
23
11
52%
13
43%
18
22%
14.1 (10 - 23, n=6)
39%
18.9 (1.9 - 113, n=770)
18%
Idle Average *
30
15
50%
16
47%
21
30%
18.6 (13.1 - 30, n=6)
38%
24.4 (6 - 119, n=770)
19%
Idle Maximum *
39
25
36%
27
31%
38
3%
30.1 (15.8 - 42, n=6)
23%
29.9 (8.3 - 122, n=770)
23%
Load Average *
156
95
39%
109
30%
113
28%
128 (94.8 - 156, n=6)
18%
104 (14.1 - 319, n=761)
33%
Witcher 3 ultra *
152
140
8%
155
-2%
149
2%
Load Maximum *
208
211
-1%
236
-13%
256
-23%
202 (169 - 211, n=6)
3%
175 (21.9 - 590, n=760)
16%

* ... kleiner is beter

Batterijduur
Inactief (zonder WLAN, minimale helderheid)
8h 00min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3 (Edge 44)
3h 05min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
5h 25min
Belast (maximale helderheid)
1h 12min
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS
i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, 90 Wh
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, 84 Wh
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, 99.99 Wh
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP
i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, 94.2 Wh
Average of class Gaming
 
Batterijduur
38%
48%
79%
3%
Reader / Idle
480
495
3%
505
5%
518
8%
358 (39 - 1174, n=716)
-25%
H.264
325
264 (88 - 554, n=160)
-19%
WiFi v1.3
185
378
104%
364
97%
364
97%
265 (62 - 622, n=429)
43%
Load
72
78
8%
102
42%
166
131%
79.7 (18 - 243, n=684)
11%

Pro

+ heldere, contrastrijke 4K-display
+ Pantonevalidatie
+ goede kleurnauwkeurigheid
+ hoge systeemprestaties
+ overklokbare CPU
+ metalen behuizing
+ redelijk gematigd gewicht
+ gebruikers hebben de keuze tussen G-Sync en Optimus
+ RAID 0 schijven (2 TB)
+ uitstekende Wi-Fi-transfersnelheden
+ accessoires zijn onder andere een headset, gamingmuis, externe webcam, palmsteun, tweede oplader en een laptophoes.
+ Thunderbolt 3

Contra

- middelmatige weergavetijden
- slechts één RAM-slot
- geen kaartlezer
De Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS, met dank aan Asus Germany
De Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS, met dank aan Asus Germany

Voor het volledige, Engelse testrapport, klik hier.

Met dit Zephyrus notebook en zijn Screenpad Plus probeert Asus extra waarde te bieden aan de doelgroep van gamers, streamers en contentmakers. Over het algemeen heeft de Screenpad de neiging om op een of andere manier nuttig te zijn. Dit gaat gepaard met een prijskaartje: Vergeleken met andere gaminglaptops zonder secundair beeldscherm is het gewicht van de Zephyrus hoger en zijn de afmetingen groter.

Dankzij de octa-core Core i9-10980HK CPU en de GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q GPU ontbreekt het de laptop niet aan prestaties. De processorkernen gaan vergezeld met 32 GB RAM (in dual-channel mode), die bestaat uit een 16-GB module en 16 GB gesoldeerd geheugen. Upgrades tot 48 GB zijn mogelijk. De twee NVMe SSD's in RAID 0 bieden hoge overdrachtssnelheden en veel opslagruimte (2 TB).

Alle nieuwste spellen lopen soepel op de Asus Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS.

Het G-Sync-compatibele IPS 4K-display schittert met een hoge helderheid, een goede contrastverhouding, goede kijkhoeken en - dankzij de Pantone-validatie - geweldige kleuren. Bovendien beslaat het de volledige AdobeRGB-kleurruimte. De responstijden zijn middelmatig. Voor betere responstijden is er ook een alternatieve 300-Hz Full HD-displayoptie beschikbaar.

De ruime keuze aan poorten omvat met name een Thunderbolt 3 poort. Deze kan worden gebruikt voor het aansluiten van functie-rijke dokken of externe GPU's. Bovendien kan de poort worden gebruikt om het apparaat op een lager prestatieniveau te voeden, bijvoorbeeld tijdens het reizen, met de bijgeleverde tweede AC-adapter (65 watt).

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS - 22-07-2020 v7
Sascha Mölck

Behuizing
83 / 98 → 84%
Toetsenbord
80%
Aanwijsapparaat
83%
Aansluitmogelijkheden
64 / 80 → 80%
Gewicht
60 / 10-66 → 89%
Batterij
57 / 95 → 60%
Beeldscherm
93%
Gaming-performance
94%
Applicatie-performance
89%
Temperatuur
80 / 95 → 84%
Luidheid
69 / 90 → 77%
Audio
80%
Gemiddelde
72%
85%
Gaming - Gewogen Gemiddelde

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Overzichten en testrapporten over laptops en mobieltjes > Testrapporten > Kort testrapport Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS: unieke game notebook met veel prestaties onder de motorkap
Sascha Mölck, 2020-07-28 (Update: 2020-08- 2)