Notebookcheck

Kort testrapport Acer Aspire E5-774G-78NA (GeForce 940MX GDDR5) Notebook

Sascha Mölck, 24-09-2016

Succesvolle desktopvervanger. Acer levert met de Aspire E5-774g een goed uitgeruste 17.3-inch all-rounder voor thuis. De GeForce 940MX in combinatie met GDDR5 geheugen geeft vele games vloeiend weer op het matte Full HD beeldscherm. De koper zal echter wel bijna 1000 EUR (~$1122) moeten ophoesten voor dit model.

Acer Aspire E5-774G-78NA (Aspire E5 Serie)
Processor
Intel Core i7-6500U 2.5 GHz
Grafische kaart
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX - 2048 MB, Core: 795-861 MHz, Geheugen: 1253 MHz, GDDR5, 64-bit, ForceWare 372.70, Optimus
Geheugen
8192 MB 
, DDR4-2132, dual-channel, twee geheugensloten (beide gevuld)
Beeldscherm
17.3 inch 16:9, 1920x1080 pixel 127 PPI, AU Optronics B173HTN01.1, TN LED, glimmend: nee
Moederbord
Intel Skylake-U Premium PCH
Opslag
Lite-On CV1-8B256, 256 GB 
, + WDC WD10JPVX (1TB, 5400 rpm), 1131 GB beschikbaar
Geluidskaart
Realtek ALC255 @ Intel Sunrise Point PCH - High Definition Audio Controller
Verbindingen
2 USB 2.0, 3 USB 3.0, 1 VGA, 1 HDMI, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Verbindingen: combo audio, Card Reader: SD, TPM 2.0
Netwerkmogelijkheden
Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000MBit), Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.0
Optische drive
HL-DT-ST DVDRAM GUE1N
Afmetingen
hoogte x breedte x diepte (in mm): 33.1 x 423.32 x 281.9
Batterij
41 Wh Lithium-Ion
Besturingssysteem
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: HD webcam
Bijkomende functionaliteiten
Luidsprekers: stereo, Toetsenbord: chiclet, Toetsenbordverlichting: nee, McAfee LiveSafe-Internet Security (trial), MS Office (trial), 24 Maanden Garantie
Gewicht
3 kg, Voeding: 340 g
Prijs
999 Euro

 

Size Comparison

Left: cable lock slot, Type-C-USB (USB 3.1 gen 1), Gigabit-Ethernet, VGA, HDMI, 2x USB 3.0
Left: cable lock slot, Type-C-USB (USB 3.1 gen 1), Gigabit-Ethernet, VGA, HDMI, 2x USB 3.0
Right: combo audio, 2x USB 2.0, DVD burner, power-in
Right: combo audio, 2x USB 2.0, DVD burner, power-in
SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Acer Aspire E5-774G-78NA
40.3 MB/s ∼100%
Toshiba Satellite C70-C-1FT
35.1 MB/s ∼87% -13%
Asus F756UX-T7013T
27.2 MB/s ∼67% -33%
Lenovo IdeaPad 300-17ISK 80QH001EGE
14.3 MB/s ∼35% -65%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Toshiba Satellite C70-C-1FT
84.3 MB/s ∼100% +5%
Acer Aspire E5-774G-78NA
80.5 MB/s ∼95%
Asus F756UX-T7013T
38.6 MB/s ∼46% -52%
Lenovo IdeaPad 300-17ISK 80QH001EGE
26.7 MB/s ∼32% -67%
Networking
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m
Acer Aspire E5-774G-78NA
Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter
331 MBit/s ∼100%
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m
Acer Aspire E5-774G-78NA
Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter
327 MBit/s ∼100%
295
cd/m²
312
cd/m²
310
cd/m²
282
cd/m²
320
cd/m²
290
cd/m²
294
cd/m²
327
cd/m²
287
cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 327 cd/m² Gemiddelde: 301.9 cd/m² Minimum: 23 cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling: 86 %
Helderheid in Batterij-modus: 320 cd/m²
Contrast: 800:1 (Zwart: 0.4 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 7.78 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 8.87 | - Ø
95% sRGB (Argyll) 62% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll)
Gamma: 2.27
Acer Aspire E5-774G-78NA
TN LED, 1920x1080
Acer Aspire E5-772G-70VP
TN LED, 1920x1080
HP Pavilion 17-g120ng
IPS, 1920x1080
Asus F756UX-T7013T
TN LED, 1920x1080
Toshiba Satellite C70-C-1FT
TN LED, 1600x900
Lenovo IdeaPad 300-17ISK 80QH001EGE
TN LED, 1600x900
Response Times
-84%
2%
7%
-4%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
43
70
-63%
42
2%
17
60%
42
2%
Response Time Black / White *
22
46
-109%
21
5%
10
55%
24
-9%
PWM Frequency
1000
200
-80%
1000
0%
50
-95%
Screen
-21%
19%
18%
-54%
-25%
Brightness
302
284
-6%
292
-3%
255
-16%
257
-15%
182
-40%
Brightness Distribution
86
79
-8%
86
0%
83
-3%
86
0%
77
-10%
Black Level *
0.4
0.45
-13%
0.27
32%
0.17
57%
1
-150%
0.43
-8%
Contrast
800
540
-32%
1144
43%
1576
97%
263
-67%
477
-40%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
7.78
12.04
-55%
4.53
42%
7.18
8%
13.6
-75%
9.75
-25%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
8.87
13.25
-49%
5.66
36%
7.97
10%
15.27
-72%
12.09
-36%
Gamma
2.27 106%
2.6 92%
2.62 92%
2.34 103%
1.94 124%
2.62 92%
CCT
8979 72%
14950 43%
7893 82%
8541 76%
16460 39%
12875 50%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
62
60
-3%
62
0%
59
-5%
46
-26%
49
-21%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
95
92
-3%
98
3%
94
-1%
71
-25%
76
-20%
Totaal Gemiddelde (Programma / Instellingen)
-21% / -21%
-33% / -9%
10% / 14%
-24% / -37%
-15% / -21%

* ... kleiner is beter

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Om de schermhelderheid te verlagen schakelen sommige laptops het backlight erg snel aan en uit. Dit gebeurt aan een dergelijk hoge frequentie dat het niet zichtbaar is voor het menselijk oog. Als de frequentie te laag is kunnen personen met gevoelige ogen geïrriteerd geraken, hoofdpijn krijgen en zelfs flickering waarnemen.
Screen flickering / PWM waargenomen 1000 Hz90 % helderheid instelling

Het backlight van het scherm flikkert aan 1000 Hz (hoogstwaarschijnlijk met PWM - Pulse-Width Modulation) aan een helderheid van 90 % en lager. Boven deze helderheid zou er geen flickering / PWM mogen optreden.

De frequentie van 1000 Hz is redelijk hoog en de meeste mensen die gevoelig zijn aan flickering zouden dit dus niet mogen waarnemen of geïrriteerde ogen krijgen.

Ter vergelijking: 59 % van alle geteste toestellen maakten geen gebruik van PWM om de schermhelderheid te verlagen. Als het wel werd gebruikt, werd een gemiddelde van 4352 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz waargenomen.

CalMAN - ColorChecker
CalMAN - ColorChecker
CalMAN - Grayscale
CalMAN - Grayscale
CalMAN - Saturation Sweeps
CalMAN - Saturation Sweeps

Responstijd Scherm

De responstijden van het scherm tonen hoe snel het scherm in staat is om van één kleur naar de andere te veranderen. Trage responstijden kunnen aanleiding geven tot 'nabeelden' rond bewegende objecten of het scherm wazig maken (blur). Vooral spelers van snelle 3D-games hebben baat bij een scherm met snelle responstijden.
       Responstijd Zwart naar Wit
22 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd↗ 5 ms stijging
↘ 17 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde prima responstijden in onze tests maar is misschien wat te traag voor competitieve games.
Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.8 (minimum) tot 240 (maximum) ms. » 15 % van alle toestellen zijn beter.
Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd beter is dan het gemiddelde (27.1 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.
       Responstijd 50% Grijs naar 80% Grijs
43 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd↗ 23 ms stijging
↘ 20 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde trage responstijden in onze tests en is misschien te traag voor games.
Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.9 (minimum) tot 636 (maximum) ms. » 55 % van alle toestellen zijn beter.
Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd vergelijkbaar is met het gemiddelde (43.7 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
HWInfo
LatencyMon
 
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
6305
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
11143
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
4944
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
44.48 fps
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
3.64 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
1.49 Points
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
56.35 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
330 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
131 Points
Help
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
MSI CX72-7QL
Intel Core i7-7500U
145 Points ∼65% +11%
Acer Aspire E5-774G-78NA
Intel Core i7-6500U
131 Points ∼59%
HP Pavilion 17-g120ng
Intel Core i7-6500U
123 Points ∼55% -6%
Acer Aspire E5-772G-70VP
Intel Core i7-5500U
121 Points ∼54% -8%
Lenovo IdeaPad 300-17ISK 80QH001EGE
Intel Core i5-6200U
118 Points ∼53% -10%
Toshiba Satellite C70-C-1FT
Intel Core i5-6200U
116 Points ∼52% -11%
Asus F756UX-T7013T
Intel Core i5-6200U
116 Points ∼52% -11%
CPU Multi 64Bit
MSI CX72-7QL
Intel Core i7-7500U
363 Points ∼20% +10%
Acer Aspire E5-774G-78NA
Intel Core i7-6500U
330 Points ∼18%
HP Pavilion 17-g120ng
Intel Core i7-6500U
316 Points ∼17% -4%
Acer Aspire E5-772G-70VP
Intel Core i7-5500U
293 Points ∼16% -11%
Lenovo IdeaPad 300-17ISK 80QH001EGE
Intel Core i5-6200U
292 Points ∼16% -12%
Asus F756UX-T7013T
Intel Core i5-6200U
289 Points ∼16% -12%
Toshiba Satellite C70-C-1FT
Intel Core i5-6200U
288 Points ∼15% -13%
Cinebench R10
Rendering Single 32Bit
MSI CX72-7QL
Intel Core i7-7500U
5666 Points ∼64% +15%
Acer Aspire E5-774G-78NA
Intel Core i7-6500U
4944 Points ∼56%
Acer Aspire E5-772G-70VP
Intel Core i7-5500U
4589 Points ∼52% -7%
Lenovo IdeaPad 300-17ISK 80QH001EGE
Intel Core i5-6200U
4412 Points ∼50% -11%
Asus F756UX-T7013T
Intel Core i5-6200U
4357 Points ∼49% -12%
HP Pavilion 17-g120ng
Intel Core i7-6500U
3295 Points ∼37% -33%
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
MSI CX72-7QL
Intel Core i7-7500U
12824 Points ∼32% +15%
Acer Aspire E5-774G-78NA
Intel Core i7-6500U
11143 Points ∼28%
Lenovo IdeaPad 300-17ISK 80QH001EGE
Intel Core i5-6200U
9971 Points ∼25% -11%
Acer Aspire E5-772G-70VP
Intel Core i7-5500U
9942 Points ∼25% -11%
Asus F756UX-T7013T
Intel Core i5-6200U
9881 Points ∼24% -11%
HP Pavilion 17-g120ng
Intel Core i7-6500U
8454 Points ∼21% -24%
Geekbench 3
32 Bit Multi-Core Score
MSI CX72-7QL
Intel Core i7-7500U
7835 Points ∼25% +14%
Acer Aspire E5-774G-78NA
Intel Core i7-6500U
6847 Points ∼22%
Lenovo IdeaPad 300-17ISK 80QH001EGE
Intel Core i5-6200U
5569 Points ∼18% -19%
32 Bit Single-Core Score
MSI CX72-7QL
Intel Core i7-7500U
3706 Points ∼80% +13%
Acer Aspire E5-774G-78NA
Intel Core i7-6500U
3266 Points ∼70%
Lenovo IdeaPad 300-17ISK 80QH001EGE
Intel Core i5-6200U
2396 Points ∼51% -27%
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
MSI CX72-7QL
Intel Core i7-7500U (Edge 25)
248.16 Points ∼1% +14%
Acer Aspire E5-774G-78NA
Intel Core i7-6500U (Edge 38.14393.0.0)
216.79 Points ∼1%
Lenovo IdeaPad 300-17ISK 80QH001EGE
Intel Core i5-6200U (Edge 25.10586.0.0)
192.58 Points ∼1% -11%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Acer Aspire E5-772G-70VP
Intel Core i7-5500U
2899.5 ms * ∼5% -153%
Lenovo IdeaPad 300-17ISK 80QH001EGE
Intel Core i5-6200U (Edge 25.10586.0.0)
1280.4 ms * ∼2% -12%
Acer Aspire E5-774G-78NA
Intel Core i7-6500U (Edge 38.14393.0.0)
1148.1 ms * ∼2%
MSI CX72-7QL
Intel Core i7-7500U (Edge 25)
961.9 ms * ∼2% +16%
Octane V2 - Total Score
MSI CX72-7QL
Intel Core i7-7500U (Edge 25)
37473 Points ∼76% +17%
Acer Aspire E5-774G-78NA
Intel Core i7-6500U (Edge 38.14393.0.0)
32108 Points ∼65%
Lenovo IdeaPad 300-17ISK 80QH001EGE
Intel Core i5-6200U (Edge 25.10586.0.0)
28189 Points ∼57% -12%
Acer Aspire E5-772G-70VP
Intel Core i7-5500U
10846 Points ∼22% -66%

* ... kleiner is beter

PCMark 7 Score
5479 punten
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
3734 punten
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
4350 punten
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
4545 punten
Help
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Acer Aspire E5-774G-78NA
GeForce 940MX, 6500U, Lite-On CV1-8B256
4545 Points ∼70%
Acer Aspire E5-772G-70VP
GeForce 940M, 5500U, Kingston RBU-SNS8100S3128GD
4444 Points ∼68% -2%
Lenovo IdeaPad 300-17ISK 80QH001EGE
Radeon R5 M330, 6200U, Toshiba MQ01ABD100
4206 Points ∼65% -7%
Asus F756UX-T7013T
GeForce GTX 950M, 6200U, HGST Travelstar 5K1000 HTS541010A9E680
3969 Points ∼61% -13%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Acer Aspire E5-774G-78NA
GeForce 940MX, 6500U, Lite-On CV1-8B256
3734 Points ∼62%
Acer Aspire E5-772G-70VP
GeForce 940M, 5500U, Kingston RBU-SNS8100S3128GD
3429 Points ∼57% -8%
Lenovo IdeaPad 300-17ISK 80QH001EGE
Radeon R5 M330, 6200U, Toshiba MQ01ABD100
3184 Points ∼53% -15%
Asus F756UX-T7013T
GeForce GTX 950M, 6200U, HGST Travelstar 5K1000 HTS541010A9E680
3162 Points ∼53% -15%
Toshiba Satellite C70-C-1FT
GeForce 930M, 6200U, Toshiba MQ01ABD100
2906 Points ∼49% -22%
Lite-On CV1-8B256
Sequential Read: 520.3 MB/s
Sequential Write: 332.8 MB/s
512K Read: 382.8 MB/s
512K Write: 357.7 MB/s
4K Read: 32.31 MB/s
4K Write: 85.09 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 277.7 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 269.8 MB/s
Acer Aspire E5-774G-78NA
Lite-On CV1-8B256
Acer Aspire E5-772G-70VP
Kingston RBU-SNS8100S3128GD
HP Pavilion 17-g120ng
Toshiba MQ01ABD100
Asus F756UX-T7013T
HGST Travelstar 5K1000 HTS541010A9E680
Toshiba Satellite C70-C-1FT
Toshiba MQ01ABD100
Lenovo IdeaPad 300-17ISK 80QH001EGE
Toshiba MQ01ABD100
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
-8%
-91%
-91%
-91%
-91%
Write 4k QD32
269.8
242.4
-10%
0.79
-100%
0.968
-100%
0.807
-100%
0.764
-100%
Read 4k QD32
277.7
178.5
-36%
0.679
-100%
0.812
-100%
0.773
-100%
0.708
-100%
Write 4k
85.09
86.57
2%
0.815
-99%
0.947
-99%
0.809
-99%
0.792
-99%
Read 4k
32.31
31.24
-3%
0.358
-99%
0.413
-99%
0.386
-99%
0.312
-99%
Write 512
357.7
337.2
-6%
36.95
-90%
39.12
-89%
24.93
-93%
43.34
-88%
Read 512
382.8
341.1
-11%
30.33
-92%
33.33
-91%
30.73
-92%
28.15
-93%
Write Seq
332.8
343.2
3%
96.3
-71%
105
-68%
106.7
-68%
96.3
-71%
Read Seq
520.3
514.9
-1%
104.6
-80%
105.8
-80%
107.4
-79%
100.6
-81%
Version 1 (Aspire E5-774G)
Version 1 (Aspire E5-774G)
Version 2 (Dell Inspiron 17 7778)
Version 2 (Dell Inspiron 17 7778)
3DMark 05 Standard
21714 punten
3DMark 06 Standard
15623 punten
3DMark Vantage P Result
9862 punten
3DMark 11 Performance
3008 punten
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
43456 punten
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
7667 punten
3DMark Fire Strike Score
2049 punten
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score
979 punten
3DMark Time Spy Score
710 punten
Help
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Asus F756UX-T7013T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, Intel Core i5-6200U
4083 Points ∼8% +45%
Acer Aspire E5-774G-78NA
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i7-6500U
2813 Points ∼6%
Dell Inspiron 17 7778
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i7-6500U
2734 Points ∼5% -3%
Acer Aspire E5-772G-70VP
NVIDIA GeForce 940M, Intel Core i7-5500U
2427 Points ∼5% -14%
HP Pavilion 17-g120ng
NVIDIA GeForce 940M, Intel Core i7-6500U
2389 Points ∼5% -15%
Lenovo Ideapad 510-15ISK
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i5-6200U
2343 Points ∼5% -17%
Asus VivoBook X556UQ-XO076T
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i5-6200U
2273 Points ∼4% -19%
Toshiba Satellite C70-C-1FT
NVIDIA GeForce 930M, Intel Core i5-6200U
2161 Points ∼4% -23%
Lenovo IdeaPad 300-17ISK 80QH001EGE
AMD Radeon R5 M330, Intel Core i5-6200U
1518 Points ∼3% -46%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Asus F756UX-T7013T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, Intel Core i5-6200U
2943 Points ∼7% +32%
Acer Aspire E5-774G-78NA
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i7-6500U
2231 Points ∼5%
Dell Inspiron 17 7778
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i7-6500U
1889 Points ∼5% -15%
Acer Aspire E5-772G-70VP
NVIDIA GeForce 940M, Intel Core i7-5500U
1633 Points ∼4% -27%
HP Pavilion 17-g120ng
NVIDIA GeForce 940M, Intel Core i7-6500U
1583 Points ∼4% -29%
Lenovo Ideapad 510-15ISK
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i5-6200U
1580 Points ∼4% -29%
Asus VivoBook X556UQ-XO076T
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i5-6200U
1561 Points ∼4% -30%
Lenovo IdeaPad 300-17ISK 80QH001EGE
AMD Radeon R5 M330, Intel Core i5-6200U
874 Points ∼2% -61%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Asus F756UX-T7013T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, Intel Core i5-6200U
18547 Points ∼11% +43%
Acer Aspire E5-774G-78NA
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i7-6500U
12934 Points ∼8%
Dell Inspiron 17 7778
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i7-6500U
11713 Points ∼7% -9%
Acer Aspire E5-772G-70VP
NVIDIA GeForce 940M, Intel Core i7-5500U
8854 Points ∼5% -32%
Lenovo Ideapad 510-15ISK
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i5-6200U
8541 Points ∼5% -34%
HP Pavilion 17-g120ng
NVIDIA GeForce 940M, Intel Core i7-6500U
8516 Points ∼5% -34%
Asus VivoBook X556UQ-XO076T
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i5-6200U
8310 Points ∼5% -36%
Lenovo IdeaPad 300-17ISK 80QH001EGE
AMD Radeon R5 M330, Intel Core i5-6200U
4897 Points ∼3% -62%
lage gem. hoge ultra
Tomb Raider (2013) 181.496.462.329.2fps
BioShock Infinite (2013) 116.471.462.122fps
Battlefield 4 (2013) 88.661.344.418fps
Dragon Age: Inquisition (2014) 77.249.117.811.7fps
GTA V (2015) 9180.222.39.8fps
Dirt Rally (2015) 187.269.43716.8fps
The Witcher 3 (2015) 37.923.8137.1fps
Batman: Arkham Knight (2015) 3732138fps
Mad Max (2015) 5427.224.7fps
Anno 2205 (2015) 643616.76.6fps
Call of Duty: Black Ops 3 (2015) 64.83920.119.1fps
Fallout 4 (2015) 43.328.715.812.6fps
Star Wars Battlefront (2015) 70.84520.417.3fps
Assassin's Creed Syndicate (2015) 34.426.415.35.8fps
Rainbow Six Siege (2015) 96.161.731.926.4fps
Just Cause 3 (2015) 4837.518.217fps
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 34.72414.712.7fps
XCOM 2 (2016) 45.716.210.34.1fps
Far Cry Primal (2016) 41191712fps
The Division (2016) 49.230.713.710.4fps
Hitman 2016 (2016) 26.727.915.214.7fps
Need for Speed 2016 (2016) 52.143.523.218fps
Ashes of the Singularity (2016) 22.61412.1fps
Doom (2016) 49.738.915.812.7fps
Mirror's Edge Catalyst (2016) 54.133.815.812.8fps
No Man's Sky (2016) 30.524.314.36.2fps
Deus Ex Mankind Divided (2016) 24.718.410.44.9fps
BioShock Infinite - 1366x768 High Preset
HP Pavilion 17 FHD V3A33AV
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G
117.9 fps ∼100% +90%
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1
GeForce GTX 950M, 6200U, WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPVX-22JC3T0
85.3 (min: 14.66) fps ∼72% +37%
Acer Aspire V Nitro VN7-792G-55SF
GeForce 945M, 6300HQ, Toshiba MQ02ABD100H
78.7 fps ∼67% +27%
Asus F756UX-T7013T
GeForce GTX 950M, 6200U, HGST Travelstar 5K1000 HTS541010A9E680
69.7 fps ∼59% +12%
Medion Erazer P6661 MD 99873
GeForce GTX 950M, 6500U, Phison 128GB PS3109-S9
69.5 (min: 11.6) fps ∼59% +12%
Acer Aspire E5-774G-78NA
GeForce 940MX, 6500U, Lite-On CV1-8B256
62.1 fps ∼53%
Dell Inspiron 17 7778
GeForce 940MX, 6500U, Liteonit CV3-CE512
53.1 fps ∼45% -14%
Acer Aspire E5-772G-70VP
GeForce 940M, 5500U, Kingston RBU-SNS8100S3128GD
39.9 fps ∼34% -36%
Lenovo Ideapad 510-15ISK
GeForce 940MX, 6200U, Seagate Momentus SpinPoint M8 ST1000LM024 HN-M101MBB
39.3 fps ∼33% -37%
Asus VivoBook X556UQ-XO076T
GeForce 940MX, 6200U, SK hynix SSD Canvas SC300 HFS256G32MND
39 fps ∼33% -37%
Toshiba Satellite C70-C-1FT
GeForce 930M, 6200U, Toshiba MQ01ABD100
38.78 fps ∼33% -38%
HP ProBook 470 G3 W4P78EA
Radeon R7 M340, 6200U, Samsung SSD 850 EVO 500GB
33.5 fps ∼28% -46%
Lenovo IdeaPad 300-17ISK 80QH001EGE
Radeon R5 M330, 6200U, Toshiba MQ01ABD100
20.5 fps ∼17% -67%
Acer Aspire E17 E5-752G-T7WY
Radeon R8 M365DX, A10-8700P, WDC WD10JPVX-08JC3T5
0 fps ∼0% -100%
Tomb Raider - 1366x768 High Preset AA:FX AF:8x
Acer Aspire V Nitro VN7-792G-55SF
GeForce 945M, 6300HQ, Toshiba MQ02ABD100H
68 fps ∼100% +9%
Acer Aspire E5-774G-78NA
GeForce 940MX, 6500U, Lite-On CV1-8B256
62.3 fps ∼92%
Asus VivoBook X556UQ-XO076T
GeForce 940MX, 6200U, SK hynix SSD Canvas SC300 HFS256G32MND
34.5 fps ∼51% -45%
Toshiba Satellite C70-C-1FT
GeForce 930M, 6200U, Toshiba MQ01ABD100
33 fps ∼49% -47%
Battlefield 4 - 1366x768 High Preset
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1
GeForce GTX 950M, 6200U, WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPVX-22JC3T0
63.1 fps ∼100% +42%
Acer Aspire V Nitro VN7-792G-55SF
GeForce 945M, 6300HQ, Toshiba MQ02ABD100H
54.4 fps ∼86% +23%
Medion Erazer P6661 MD 99873
GeForce GTX 950M, 6500U, Phison 128GB PS3109-S9
46.2 fps ∼73% +4%
Acer Aspire E5-774G-78NA
GeForce 940MX, 6500U, Lite-On CV1-8B256
44.4 fps ∼70%
Dell Inspiron 17 7778
GeForce 940MX, 6500U, Liteonit CV3-CE512
32.4 fps ∼51% -27%
Asus VivoBook X556UQ-XO076T
GeForce 940MX, 6200U, SK hynix SSD Canvas SC300 HFS256G32MND
29.3 fps ∼46% -34%
Acer Aspire E5-772G-70VP
GeForce 940M, 5500U, Kingston RBU-SNS8100S3128GD
28.5 fps ∼45% -36%
Star Wars Battlefront - 1024x768 Low Preset
Acer Aspire E5-774G-78NA
GeForce 940MX, 6500U, Lite-On CV1-8B256
70.8 fps ∼100%
Asus VivoBook X556UQ-XO076T
GeForce 940MX, 6200U, SK hynix SSD Canvas SC300 HFS256G32MND
50.5 fps ∼71% -29%
Dell Inspiron 17 7778
GeForce 940MX, 6500U, Liteonit CV3-CE512
40.1 fps ∼57% -43%
Mirror's Edge Catalyst - 1280x720 Low Preset AF:2x
Acer Aspire E5-774G-78NA
GeForce 940MX, 6500U, Lite-On CV1-8B256
54.1 fps ∼100%
Asus VivoBook X556UQ-XO076T
GeForce 940MX, 6200U, SK hynix SSD Canvas SC300 HFS256G32MND
47.8 fps ∼88% -12%
Dell Inspiron 17 7778
GeForce 940MX, 6500U, Liteonit CV3-CE512
44 fps ∼81% -19%
Dirt Rally - 1366x768 Medium Preset
Acer Aspire V Nitro VN7-792G-55SF
GeForce 945M, 6300HQ, Toshiba MQ02ABD100H
98.5 fps ∼100% +42%
Acer Aspire E5-774G-78NA
GeForce 940MX, 6500U, Lite-On CV1-8B256
69.4 fps ∼70%
Medion Erazer P6661 MD 99873
GeForce GTX 950M, 6500U, Phison 128GB PS3109-S9
66.2 (min: 45.7) fps ∼67% -5%
Dell Inspiron 17 7778
GeForce 940MX, 6500U, Liteonit CV3-CE512
52.4 fps ∼53% -24%

Geluidsniveau

Onbelast
33.2 / 33.2 / 33.7 dB (A)
HDD
33 dB (A)
DVD
36.6 / dB (A)
Belasting
36 / 40 dB (A)
 
 
 
30 dB
stil
40 dB(A)
hoorbaar
50 dB(A)
luid
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm afstand)   environment noise: 31.2 dB(A)
Acer Aspire E5-774G-78NA
6500U, GeForce 940MX
Acer Aspire E5-772G-70VP
5500U, GeForce 940M
HP Pavilion 17-g120ng
6500U, GeForce 940M
Asus F756UX-T7013T
6200U, GeForce GTX 950M
Toshiba Satellite C70-C-1FT
6200U, GeForce 930M
Lenovo IdeaPad 300-17ISK 80QH001EGE
6200U, Radeon R5 M330
Noise
-2%
-9%
-4%
2%
1%
off / environment *
31.2
31.2
-0%
31.2
-0%
31.2
-0%
Idle Minimum *
33.2
32
4%
33.5
-1%
32.4
2%
32.3
3%
32.5
2%
Idle Average *
33.2
32.3
3%
33.5
-1%
32.6
2%
32.3
3%
33.4
-1%
Idle Maximum *
33.7
32.6
3%
33.5
1%
32.6
3%
33.2
1%
33.4
1%
Load Average *
36
41.2
-14%
45
-25%
42
-17%
34.9
3%
36.1
-0%
Load Maximum *
40
41.6
-4%
47
-18%
45.2
-13%
40.3
-1%
38.8
3%

* ... kleiner is beter

Max. Belasting
 33.4 °C28.7 °C25.6 °C 
 34.2 °C37.1 °C26 °C 
 32.9 °C36.1 °C28.9 °C 
Maximum: 37.1 °C
Gemiddelde: 31.4 °C
23.6 °C25.5 °C34 °C
23.9 °C27.5 °C48 °C
28.1 °C34.3 °C32 °C
Maximum: 48 °C
Gemiddelde: 30.8 °C
Stroomadapter (max.)  39 °C | Kamertemperatuur 22.6 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket
Acer Aspire E5-774G-78NA
6500U, GeForce 940MX
Acer Aspire E5-772G-70VP
5500U, GeForce 940M
HP Pavilion 17-g120ng
6500U, GeForce 940M
Asus F756UX-T7013T
6200U, GeForce GTX 950M
Toshiba Satellite C70-C-1FT
6200U, GeForce 930M
Lenovo IdeaPad 300-17ISK 80QH001EGE
6200U, Radeon R5 M330
Heat
-20%
-10%
-5%
7%
4%
Maximum Upper Side *
37.1
46.9
-26%
46
-24%
42
-13%
37.4
-1%
36.6
1%
Maximum Bottom *
48
54.7
-14%
47
2%
50.5
-5%
37.6
22%
41.4
14%
Idle Upper Side *
26.1
32.6
-25%
29.7
-14%
27.2
-4%
26.7
-2%
26.2
-0%
Idle Bottom *
27.6
31.3
-13%
29.1
-5%
27
2%
25.6
7%
28
-1%

* ... kleiner is beter

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2029.533.429.52533.644.933.63134.334.434.34030.630.930.65032.432.332.46328.92828.98028.429.428.410026.429.426.412526.527.426.516024.53424.520024.43924.425023.147.823.131522.650.922.640021.255.321.250020.455.720.463019.665.119.680019.468.219.410001964.919125018.555.718.5160018.252.718.2200018.658.118.6250018.561.818.5315018.667.618.6400018.871.118.8500018.869.118.8630018.868.618.8800018.968.918.91000018.871.718.81250018.772.918.71600018.677.718.6SPL31.279.531.2N1.641.91.6median 18.9Acer Aspire E5-774G-78NAmedian 61.8median 18.9Delta1.410.21.435.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHzmedian 17.84.62.4hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Acer Aspire E5-774G-78NA audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (11.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (26.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 83% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 12% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 18%, worst was 35%
Compared to all devices tested
» 74% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 21% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 9%, average was 18%, worst was 41%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Stroomgebruik
Uit / Standbydarklight 0.22 / 2.66 Watt
Inactiefdarkmidlight 8.2 / 12.6 / 13 Watt
Belasting midlight 51 / 54.6 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Acer Aspire E5-774G-78NA
6500U, GeForce 940MX
Acer Aspire E5-772G-70VP
5500U, GeForce 940M
HP Pavilion 17-g120ng
6500U, GeForce 940M
Asus F756UX-T7013T
6200U, GeForce GTX 950M
Toshiba Satellite C70-C-1FT
6200U, GeForce 930M
Lenovo IdeaPad 300-17ISK 80QH001EGE
6200U, Radeon R5 M330
Power Consumption
-5%
15%
-2%
-5%
36%
Idle Minimum *
8.2
6
27%
4.8
41%
5.8
29%
10.6
-29%
4.5
45%
Idle Average *
12.6
12.2
3%
10.1
20%
11.2
11%
13.5
-7%
8.1
36%
Idle Maximum *
13
14.5
-12%
10.4
20%
11.9
8%
14
-8%
8.7
33%
Load Average *
51
54
-6%
45.4
11%
54
-6%
44
14%
29.8
42%
Load Maximum *
54.6
73.7
-35%
63
-15%
84
-54%
52
5%
42
23%

* ... kleiner is beter

Batterijduur
Inactief (zonder WLAN, minimale helderheid)
11h 42min
Surfen met WLAN v1.3 (Edge 38.14393.0.0)
5h 22min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
4h 59min
Belast (maximale helderheid)
1h 00min
Acer Aspire E5-774G-78NA
41 Wh
Acer Aspire E5-772G-70VP
37 Wh
HP Pavilion 17-g120ng
41 Wh
Asus F756UX-T7013T
38 Wh
Toshiba Satellite C70-C-1FT
44 Wh
Lenovo IdeaPad 300-17ISK 80QH001EGE
41 Wh
Batterijduur
-12%
-20%
-13%
-22%
26%
Reader / Idle
702
454
-35%
491
-30%
Load
60
72
20%
75
25%
WiFi v1.3
322
259
-20%
256
-20%
217
-33%
252
-22%
406
26%
H.264
299

Pro

+ mat beeldscherm
+ Full HD resolutie
+ voldoende rekenkracht
+ SSD + HDD
+ onderhoudsdeksel
+ ac Wi-Fi

Contra

- plaatsing aansluitingen
In review: Acer Aspire E5-774G-78NA. Test model courtesy of Notebooksbilliger.de
In review: Acer Aspire E5-774G-78NA. Test model courtesy of Notebooksbilliger.de

Dit is de verkorte versie van het originele artikel. Het volledige, Engelse testrapport vind je hier.

De Acer 17.3-inch laptop biedt een fatsoenlijke hoeveelheid applicatie prestaties. Verder kan de laptop vele nieuwe en de meeste oudere games vloeiend weergeven zonder extreem luide systeemkoeling. De geluidsontwikkeling blijft bij alle soorten belasting binnen de perken. Hetzelfde geld voor de temperaturen. Een snelle solid state drive verzekerd een vloeiend-draaiend systeem, en een 2.5-inch harde schijf biedt voldoende opslagruimte. Beide opslagapparaten kunnen makkelijk vervangen worden omdat Acer de notebook uitgerust heeft met een onderhoudsdeksel. Het toetsenbord is niet een topmodel, maar kan ons voldoende bekoren. De batterijlevensduur is ook goed voor een 17.3-inch notebook.

Acer levert met zijn Aspire E5-774g een succesvolle all-rounder voor thuis af.

Het beeldscherm van de laptop geeft geen grote redenen tot klagen. Het is helder, met hoog contrast en het kleurbereik is goed. Het enige nadeel: Acer gebruikt een kijkhoek beperkend TN-paneel. Hoewel het een erg goed paneel is, had een IPS-paneel de laptop beter gecomplementeerd. In een laptop die bedoelt is als desktopvervanger is dit echter te vergeven.

Acer Aspire E5-774G-78NA - 16-09-2016 v5.1
Sascha Mölck

Behuizing
79 / 98 → 80%
Toetsenbord
74%
Aanwijsapparaat
84%
Aansluitmogelijkheden
48 / 81 → 60%
Gewicht
57 / 67 → 79%
Batterij
82%
Beeldscherm
82%
Gaming-performance
67 / 85 → 79%
Applicatie-performance
87 / 92 → 94%
Temperatuur
92%
Luidheid
84 / 95 → 88%
Audio
54%
Camera
25 / 85 → 29%
Gemiddelde
70%
78%
Multimedia - Gewogen Gemiddelde

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Overzichten en testrapporten over laptops en mobieltjes > Testrapporten > Kort testrapport Acer Aspire E5-774G-78NA (GeForce 940MX GDDR5) Notebook
Sascha Mölck, 2016-09-24 (Update: 2016-09-27)