Sony Xperia X Compact
Laptopspecificaties

Secundaire Camera: 5 MPix (f/2.4, Exmor-R-sensor 1/5", 25-mm-breedbeeld)
Price comparison
Gemiddelde van 53 score (van 102 beoordelingen)
Testrapporten voor de Sony Xperia X Compact
Compact mét uithoudingsvermogen, maar niet meer high-end. Sony biedt dit jaar opnieuw een compacte versie van zijn vlaggenschip-smartphone aan. Het kleinere model moet het vanaf nu echter stellen met tragere hardware. Ons testrapport wijst uit dat dit niet noodzakelijk een probleem is.
Bron: Computer Totaal
 Archive.org version
 Archive.org versionDe Xperia X Compact is een prettige smartphone in gebruik door zijn formaat, accuduur en vlotte werking. Ben je op zoek naar een bescheiden formaat, dan valt er geen buil te vallen aan het toestel. Voor het prijskaartje van 450 euro had Sony echter wel wat meer mogen leveren, het blijft immers een plastic toestel met een matig scherm en tegenvallende processor.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 21-01-2017
Beoordeling: Totale score: 60%
Bron: All About Phones
 Archive.org version
 Archive.org versionWie een kleine smartphone met goede specificaties wil moet al jaren bij Sony zijn. Sony’s Compact-toestellen zijn – in ieder geval op Androidgebied – al jaren het beste wat je wat dat betreft kunt krijgen. Die lijn zet Sony met de Xperia X Compact door en in simpele woorden kan ik deze Sony Xperia X Compact review concluderen met het feit dat de telefoon nog altijd dé optie is voor iedereen die een compacte en geavanceerde telefoon wil.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 15-01-2017
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80%
Bron: GadgetGear.nl
 Archive.org version
 Archive.org versionDe Sony Xperia X Compact is een lastig toestel. Zoek je een klein toestel, dan is het toestel een aanrader omdat dit één van de krachtigste toestellen van dit moment is. Op dit beeldformaat. Is het formaat minder belangrijk, dan prijst het toestel zichzelf simpelweg uit de markt. Bovendien doet het vele plastic ook niet veel voor de ‘premium’ beleving. Er zit wel een goed geluid in. Heel goed.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 09-11-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80%
Bron: AndroidWorld.nl
 Archive.org version
 Archive.org versionMet de Xperia X Compact laat Sony opnieuw zien een uitstekend compact toestel neer te kunnen zetten. Nee, op papier is het toestel geen gekrompen Xperia XZ, maar staat prima zelf zijn mannetje. De specificaties zijn niet die van de absolute top, maar dat merk je in het dagelijks gebruik niet. Het toestel laat wel zien dat er nog ruimte voor concurrentie en verbeteringen is op de markt voor compacte smartphones.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 02-11-2016
Bron: Bright.nl
 Archive.org version
 Archive.org versionAls je een high-end-smartphone in een klein formaat zoekt, dan is de Xperia X Compact een logische keuze. De hardware, accuduur en camera zijn dik in orde en de plastic Lumia-achtige behuizing heeft iets schattigs. Niet iedereen zal het plastic design even mooi vinden, maar de telefoon is daardoor wel lekker licht en stevig.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 23-10-2016
Bron: GadgetGear.nl
 Archive.org version
 Archive.org versionSony heeft zojuist twee nieuwe toestellen gelanceerd. Het gaat om de Xperia ZX en de Xperia Compact X. Beiden zijn op hun eigen formaat nieuwe vlaggenschip toestellen uit de Xperia serie.
Vergelijking, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 02-09-2016
Anderstalige testrapporten
Bron: Techradar
 EN→NL Archive.org version
 EN→NL Archive.org versionSony's X Compact is the best-looking yet in the small range. However, the quest to attract more eyes brought about a few too many sacrifices. Compared to the Z5 Compact, it's a slightly underpowered and fragile offering.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 07-08-2017
Beoordeling: Totale score: 60%
Bron: Techradar
 EN→NL Archive.org version
 EN→NL Archive.org versionSony's X Compact is the best-looking yet in the small range. However, the quest to attract more eyes brought about a few too many sacrifices. Compared to the Z5 Compact, it's a slightly underpowered and fragile offering.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 15-05-2017
Beoordeling: Totale score: 60%
Bron: Techradar
 EN→NL Archive.org version
 EN→NL Archive.org versionSony's X Compact is the best-looking yet in the small range. However, the quest to attract more eyes brought about a few too many sacrifices. Compared to the Z5 Compact, it's a slightly underpowered and fragile offering.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 08-04-2017
Beoordeling: Totale score: 60%
Bron: Gadgetspeak
 EN→NL Archive.org version
 EN→NL Archive.org versionHaving recently told you about the larger Xperia XZ here a chance to put the smaller sibling through its paces, like the larger offering both were supplied by Vodafone and with this I got the chance to check their coverage not only in England but also Scotland.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer kort, Datum: 01-03-2017
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80% prijs: 60% prestatie: 80% afwerking: 80%
Bron: Laptop Media
 EN→NL Archive.org version
 EN→NL Archive.org versionWhen we are talking about Android smartphones, it is difficult to find models with screen size less than 5 inches as the 5.5-inch diagonal is growing ever more popular. We believe that there certainly is a group of users who still prefer more compact devices. These who provide not only comfortable grip with one hand but also the ability to easily operate with this very hand. Usually, when we are discussing a compact smartphone it’s most likely a budget offer. Xperia X Compact, however, is something different.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 21-01-2017
Bron: Tech Smart
 EN→NL Archive.org version
 EN→NL Archive.org versionDespite proving solid in all departments, the X compact has arrived a little late on the scene. It's no fault of the phone, however, but simply a fact that it was released alongside the XZ flagship and is not specced in a similar fashion, as has been the trend for previous versions of Xperia compact devices, like the Z1 and Z1 Compact. As such, instead of users hoping for a smaller version of the XZ top of the range offering, what they actually have is a smaller version of the mid-range X with an improved camera.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 06-12-2016
Bron: GSM Arena
 EN→NL Archive.org version
 EN→NL Archive.org versionTo wrap things up, the Sony Xperia X Compact is a great small smartphone. If you look beyond the specs sheet, this is one of the best small phones you can buy. It has a capable camera that, in good light, would capture photos with unrivaled detail. It's got a top build quality, an excellent screen, a snappy, well-placed fingerprint reader, stereo speakers and a solid processor.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 22-11-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 70% prestatie: 100% beeldscherm: 80% mobiliteit: 80% afwerking: 50%
Bron: Soycincau
 EN→NL Archive.org version
 EN→NL Archive.org versionThere’s simply no meaningful competition for Sony or the Xperia X Compact right now. They’re king. If you want a “flagship” compact Android phone, your hands are tied because this is really your only real option right now. So either you get something that has a larger screen or prepare to pony up for the X Compact.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 09-11-2016
Bron: Brighthand
 EN→NL Archive.org version
 EN→NL Archive.org versionThe hardware keeps the Sony Xperia X Compact out of the flagship space, but it’s still one of the best devices smaller than five inches on the market. Its long-lasting battery deserves the most praise, and we also like its modern design, attractive display, and decent performance.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 08-11-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 70%
Bron: CNet
 EN→NL Archive.org version
 EN→NL Archive.org versionSony's Xperia X Compact is a small phone with an excellent camera, but it lacks some creature comforts, like waterproofing and, in the US, a fingerprint sensor.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 26-10-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 75% prestatie: 70% mobiliteit: 70% afwerking: 80%
Bron: T Break
 EN→NL Archive.org version
 EN→NL Archive.org versionWhether the Sony Xperia X Compact is truly a successor to the previous Xperia Z5 Compact is a very tricky question. The new device does bring in a new appealing design that feels more comfortable to hold, faster fingerprint scanning, better cameras that produce cleaner images, and amazing predictive autofocusing with 5-axis stabilization for videos. Despite having a less powerful processor, the performance of the device is also good.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 12-10-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 90% prijs: 85% prestatie: 85% functionaliteiten: 85% afwerking: 90%
Bron: Trusted Reviews
 EN→NL Archive.org version
 EN→NL Archive.org versionThe Sony Xperia X Compact is far from the worst Android phone I've used this year, even if it is one of the ugliest. If you want an Android phone with a display size smaller than 5 inches then it’s probably your only choice. Widen your horizons, however, and there are better choices out there.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 11-10-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 60% prijs: 60% prestatie: 70% beeldscherm: 80% mobiliteit: 80% afwerking: 50%
Bron: Tech Advisor
 EN→NL Archive.org version
 EN→NL Archive.org versionThe Sony Xperia X Compact is an odd little smartphone. On the one hand its build quality, lack of waterproofing and lack of a standout feature make it harder to recommend compared to the older Xperia Z5 Compact. However, if you want a sub-5in Android smartphone with excellent battery life it’s the best current option out there. For all its flaws, we also kept coming back to the phone largely due to its sheer portability. Just don’t buy the blue one.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 06-10-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 70% prijs: 70% prestatie: 70% functionaliteiten: 80% afwerking: 70%
Bron: Tom's Guide
 EN→NL Archive.org version
 EN→NL Archive.org versionStill, $500 is a lot to pay for a phone whose camera doesn't perform as well in low light as Sony promises. It's also not as speedy as phones that are cheaper. Overall, we prefer the Honor 8 and OnePlus 3, both of which cost $100 less than the compact Xperia. But if you value battery life in a compact design, Sony's latest phone may fit the bill.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 29-09-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 70%
Bron: PC Mag
 EN→NL Archive.org version
 EN→NL Archive.org versionThe Sony Xperia X Compact is a capable midrange phone with a good camera, but at $500, it's priced higher than most of its competition, including our Editors' Choice for compact phones, the Apple iPhone SE. For $100 less the SE gets you a more powerful processor, a fingerprint scanner, and Apple's superior app ecosystem. If Apple is out the question, the $400 ZTE Axon 7 also gets you a faster processor and a fingerprint sensor, as well as a much sharper display. But it's significantly larger than the X Compact, and not ideal for one-handed use. That makes the X Compact one of the best compact Android phones you can buy, though you'll get a lot more bang for your buck by going larger.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer kort, Datum: 28-09-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 70%
Bron: Expert Reviews
 EN→NL Archive.org version
 EN→NL Archive.org versionEqually, though, the X Compact is a disappointment in other areas. It’s nowhere near as nice a thing as the Z5 Compact, it’s not as quick and it isn’t water-resistant, either. All things told, I still prefer the Z5 Compact, even more so now that the two phones are now on sale for around the same price.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 27-09-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80%
Bron: Recombu
 EN→NL Archive.org version
 EN→NL Archive.org versionSony’s Xperia X Compact isn’t much of an evolution over last year’s Xperia Z5 Compact, offering up pretty much the same performance and battery life while also stripping away water resistance and 4K video recording. Considering it’s about the same price, that means existing owners have no need to upgrade.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 26-09-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 90%
Bron: Android Authority
 EN→NL Archive.org version
 EN→NL Archive.org versionThe Xperia X Compact is a great phone, and if you choose to buy one, you certainly won’t be disappointed. However, without a fingerprint sensor (with the US version), or features like dust and water resistance, the $500 price tag is hard to accept, just for the convenience that its size offers. If you are looking for the best value for money, this phone isn’t the one to get, but if you just want a compact phone that doesn’t compromise a whole lot, that’s when you might find this device to be worth every penny.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 26-09-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 84% prestatie: 90% beeldscherm: 80% mobiliteit: 80% afwerking: 80%
Bron: Techradar
 EN→NL Archive.org version
 EN→NL Archive.org versionSony's X Compact is the best-looking yet in the small range. However, the quest to attract more eyes brought about a few too many sacrifices. Compared to the Z5 Compact, it's a slightly underpowered and fragile offering.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 22-09-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 60%
Bron: Android Central
 EN→NL Archive.org version
 EN→NL Archive.org versionThe Xperia X Compact gives you everything you need in terms of screen, performance, battery life — plus a few nice additions like stereo speakers, a slick software experience and Sony's latest camera technology. But this isn't simply a flagship-level phone in a smaller size: you're getting a plastic phone that's also missing a fingerprint sensor and waterproofing. So for as great as the X Compact is, it sits in an odd area — offering you less than other phones, but still commanding a $499 price. You really have to want a small phone to spend that much on the X Compact.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 22-09-2016
Bron: Phone Arena
 EN→NL Archive.org version
 EN→NL Archive.org versionAs far as the competition goes, the X Compact is really in a niche of its own right now. There's the cheaper but similarly sized Samsung Galaxy A3 (2016), which has a 4.7” display, a fancier styling, decent camera, and fine battery life, though considerably less-potent hardware. Looking away from Android, the 4.7” iPhone 6 can be found at a similar price point today, and can actually get you much more phone for the money. In the X Compact's $450-$500 range, however, there is little in Android's small-and-strong category but its predecessor, the Z5 Compact, which happens to be a more powerful handset, at a lower price right now.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 21-09-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 68%
Bron: GSM Arena
 EN→NL Archive.org version
 EN→NL Archive.org versionIf you want the compact version of the Xperia X Compact review, here it goes. Sony hasn't given up on the concept of high-powered minis, just toned it down a notch. A few signature features have gone missing, yes, but then again so have the rivals in this admittedly niche category. Price has been adjusted accordingly too, and for those who still find it steep a few months of patience could well be worth it.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 17-09-2016
Bron: PC Mag
 EN→NL Archive.org version
 EN→NL Archive.org versionThe Xperia X Compact will be available in the US starting September 25. Pricing has not yet been announced, but the lesser specs in play here will be a lot easier to swallow if they come at a significantly reduced price. Check back soon for more info, as well as a full review when the phone is available.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer kort, Datum: 01-09-2016
Bron: Pocket Lint
 EN→NL Archive.org version
 EN→NL Archive.org versionThe Sony Xperia X Compact is over-shadowed by the devices that have come before it carrying the same name. The Compact was once the de facto choice for those wanting a smaller device that doesn't compromise on the power it offers, for flagship performance.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 01-09-2016
Bron: Stuff TV
 EN→NL Archive.org version
 EN→NL Archive.org versionFrom what we've seen so far, the Xperia X Compact looks set to be the best miniature handset around. It's no surprise really, given Sony's past commitment to cramming in respectable specs into a small-screened device.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer kort, Datum: 01-09-2016
Bron: Trusted Reviews
 EN→NL Archive.org version
 EN→NL Archive.org versionBeing someone who's used each iteration of the Xperia Compact over the years, I’m a little disappointed by the latest version. By ditching the theme of presenting high-end specs in a small body, Sony has simply ended up with a small mid-range phone that doesn’t really do anything differently. It isn't water-resistant, it doesn’t have the same specs as the Xperia flagships, and it's truly ugly to boot.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer kort, Datum: 01-09-2016
Bron: Expert Reviews
 EN→NL Archive.org version
 EN→NL Archive.org versionIf you don’t fancy shelling out for a full-priced flagship, your options are a mid-range device from one of the big manufacturers, or grabbing a bargain device from OnePlus or the Nexus ranges. Come October, though, and you’ll also be able to choose the Xperia X Compact. If prices are reasonable, and that camera is as good as Sony claims, this little smartphone could be a shoo-in for one of the best compact phones of 2016.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 01-09-2016
Bron: International Business Times
 EN→NL Archive.org version
 EN→NL Archive.org versionUnlike the metal-backed XZ, the Compact has a glass back which is the same colour as its glass front and metal sides. Despite its smaller size and expected lower cost, the X Compact is still clearly a flagship phone with the looks, performance and camera to match. It has the same 23-megapixel rear camera and the same smart charging technology as the XZ. The processor if the X Compact is the Snapdragon 650, whereas the XZ uses the higher-spec 820.
Vergelijking, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 01-09-2016
Bron: Android Mag
 DE→NL Archive.org version
 DE→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 28-01-2017
Beoordeling: prestatie: 100% functionaliteiten: 100% beeldscherm: 80% mobiliteit: 60% afwerking: 60%
Bron: Cyberbloc
 DE→NL Archive.org version
 DE→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 26-01-2017
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80%
Bron: Area DVD
 DE→NL Archive.org version
 DE→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 08-12-2016
Bron: Billiger-telefonieren.de
 DE→NL Archive.org version
 DE→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 15-11-2016
Bron: Verivox
 DE→NL Archive.org version
 DE→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 11-11-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 67% functionaliteiten: 63% ergonomie: 74%
Bron: WinFuture
 DE→NL Archive.org version
 DE→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 02-11-2016
Bron: Inside Handy
 DE→NL Archive.org version
 DE→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 02-11-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80%
Bron: Connect - Heft 12/2016

Enkel testrapport, , Lengte onbekend, Datum: 01-11-2016
Bron: Smartphone Magazin - Heft 1/2017

Enkel testrapport, , Lengte onbekend, Datum: 01-11-2016
Bron: Teltarif
 DE→NL Archive.org version
 DE→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 17-10-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 87% functionaliteiten: 85% afwerking: 92% ergonomie: 87%
Bron: Computerbase
 DE→NL Archive.org version
 DE→NL Archive.org versionVergelijking, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 11-10-2016
Bron: PCtipp.ch
 DE→NL Archive.org version
 DE→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 10-10-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80%
Bron: Futurezone.at
 DE→NL Archive.org version
 DE→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 08-10-2016
Bron: n-tv
 DE→NL Archive.org version
 DE→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 05-10-2016
Bron: Android Pit
 DE→NL Archive.org version
 DE→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 01-10-2016
Bron: e-media - Heft 11/2016

Enkel testrapport, , Lengte onbekend, Datum: 01-10-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80%
Bron: Curved
 DE→NL Archive.org version
 DE→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 29-09-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 82% prestatie: 84% beeldscherm: 75% mobiliteit: 84%
Bron: Blick
 DE→NL Archive.org version
 DE→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 27-09-2016
Bron: Chip.de
 DE→NL Archive.org version
 DE→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 23-09-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 89% prijs: 86% prestatie: 94% functionaliteiten: 86% beeldscherm: 88% mobiliteit: 87%
Bron: A1 Blog
 DE→NL Archive.org version
 DE→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 08-09-2016
Bron: Android Pit
 DE→NL Archive.org version
 DE→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 01-09-2016
Bron: Curved
 DE→NL Archive.org version
 DE→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 01-09-2016
Bron: Computerbild - Heft 19/2016

Enkel testrapport, , Lengte onbekend, Datum: 15-08-2016
Bron: Zona Movilidad
 ES→NL Archive.org version
 ES→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 18-02-2017
Bron: Movil Zona
 ES→NL Archive.org version
 ES→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 04-11-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 75%
Bron: Tuexperto
 ES→NL Archive.org version
 ES→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 01-11-2016
Bron: El Androide Libre
 ES→NL Archive.org version
 ES→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 31-10-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 82%
Bron: Computerhoy
 ES→NL Archive.org version
 ES→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 22-10-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 81% prijs: 70% functionaliteiten: 80% beeldscherm: 80% mobiliteit: 80% afwerking: 60%
Bron: Andro 4 All
 ES→NL Archive.org version
 ES→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 19-10-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 84%
Bron: Techstation.it
 IT→NL Archive.org version
 IT→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 12-06-2017
Bron: Ridble
 IT→NL Archive.org version
 IT→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 19-01-2017
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80%
Bron: Batista70Phone
 IT→NL Archive.org version
 IT→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 24-11-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 76% prijs: 50% beeldscherm: 80% mobiliteit: 90% ergonomie: 100%
Bron: AndroidPit.it
 IT→NL Archive.org version
 IT→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 17-10-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 85% prijs: 75% functionaliteiten: 80% beeldscherm: 90% mobiliteit: 80% ergonomie: 80%
Bron: HDblog.it
 IT→NL Archive.org version
 IT→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 10-10-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 82%
Bron: Smartphone e tablet android
 IT→NL Archive.org version
 IT→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 10-10-2016
Beoordeling: prestatie: 80% beeldscherm: 80% mobiliteit: 70% afwerking: 70%
Bron: Andrea Galeazzi
 IT→NL Archive.org version
 IT→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 26-09-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 85% prijs: 79% beeldscherm: 82% mobiliteit: 82% afwerking: 86%
Bron: AndroidPit.it
 IT→NL Archive.org version
 IT→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 07-09-2016
Bron: Les Mobiles
 FR→NL Archive.org version
 FR→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 12-03-2017
Beoordeling: Totale score: 76%
Bron: Top for Phone
 FR→NL Archive.org version
 FR→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 02-01-2017
Bron: CNet France
 FR→NL Archive.org version
 FR→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 16-11-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 70%
Bron: AndroidPit.fr
 FR→NL Archive.org version
 FR→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 24-09-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 70%
Bron: Phonandroid
 FR→NL Archive.org version
 FR→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 16-09-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80%
Bron: Frandroid
 FR→NL Archive.org version
 FR→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 16-09-2016
Bron: AndroidPit.fr
 FR→NL Archive.org version
 FR→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer kort, Datum: 02-09-2016
Bron: One Tech
 PL→NL Archive.org version
 PL→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 24-11-2016
Bron: Gry.wm.pl
 PL→NL Archive.org version
 PL→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 19-11-2016
Bron: Komorkomania
 PL→NL Archive.org version
 PL→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 08-11-2016
Bron: Spiders Web
 PL→NL Archive.org version
 PL→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 20-10-2016
Bron: 90 Sekund
 PL→NL Archive.org version
 PL→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 19-10-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 70% prestatie: 90% functionaliteiten: 60% mobiliteit: 90% afwerking: 50%
Bron: Android.com.pl
 PL→NL Archive.org version
 PL→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 28-09-2016
Bron: Spiders Web
 PL→NL Archive.org version
 PL→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 24-09-2016
Bron: Tabletowo
 PL→NL Archive.org version
 PL→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 19-09-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 84% prestatie: 90% beeldscherm: 90% mobiliteit: 90% afwerking: 75%
Bron: Antyweb
 PL→NL Archive.org version
 PL→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 19-09-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 90%
Bron: Hi-Tech Mail
 RU→NL Archive.org version
 RU→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 01-12-2016
Bron: Ferra.ru
 RU→NL Archive.org version
 RU→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 20-10-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80%
Bron: Product Test
 RU→NL Archive.org version
 RU→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 01-09-2016
Bron: Svet Androida
 CZ→NL Archive.org version
 CZ→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 19-03-2017
Bron: CNews.cz
 CZ→NL Archive.org version
 CZ→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 31-01-2017
Bron: CZC
 CZ→NL Archive.org version
 CZ→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 19-11-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 75%
Bron: The Gioididong
 VN→NL Archive.org version
 VN→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 09-09-2016
Bron: Tek.no
 NO→NL Archive.org version
 NO→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 28-09-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 70%
Bron: Mere Mobil.dk
 DA→NL Archive.org version
 DA→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 30-09-2016
Bron: Mere Mobil.dk
 DA→NL Archive.org version
 DA→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 30-09-2016
Bron: Mobilsiden.dk
 DA→NL Archive.org version
 DA→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer kort, Datum: 20-09-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 67%
Bron: Mobil DK
 DA→NL Archive.org version
 DA→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 19-09-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 84% beeldscherm: 80% mobiliteit: 90% afwerking: 80%
Bron: M3 PC för alla
 SV→NL Archive.org version
 SV→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 23-09-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 90%
Bron: Mobil.se
 SV→NL Archive.org version
 SV→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 20-09-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 76% prestatie: 70%
Bron: Techbox
 SK→NL Archive.org version
 SK→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 04-10-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 94%
Commentaar
Qualcomm Adreno 510:
Geïntegreerde grafische kaart gebaseerd op de Adreno 500-architectuur, net als de Adreno 520 in de Snapdragon 820. Prestaties zouden gelijkaardig moeten zijn als die van de oude Adreno 330 in de Snapdragon 801. Biedt ondersteuning voor DirectX 12, OpenCL 2.0, OpenGL ES 3.1 + AE.
Alleen oudere games kunnen vloeiend draaien met deze grafische chips (als ze niet veeleisend zijn). Gedeeld geheugen grafische cores in deze categorie hebben het voordeel van minder warmte-ontwikkeling en langere batterijlooptijd. Voor kantoor, internet, beeldcorrectie- en videomonteringswerk zijn deze grafische chips nog steeds bruikbaar zonder enige beperkingen.
>> Meer informatie kan gevonden worden in ons Vergelijk van Mobiele Grafische Kaarten en de passende Benchmark Tabel.
650 MSM8956: 
>> Meer informatie kan gevonden worden in ons Vergelijk van Mobiele Processors.
